Introduction: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is known to be an effective locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few comparative studies in treatment-naïve cases have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of PBT with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with treatment-naïve solitary HCC.
Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients with treatment-naïve HCC, a single nodule measuring ≤5 cm in diameter, and a Child-Pugh score of ≤8 who were treated with PBT at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2001 and 2013 were enrolled in the study. In addition, 836 patients with treatment-naïve HCC treated by RFA at the University of Tokyo Hospital during the same period were analyzed as controls. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in 83 patient pairs after propensity score matching.
Results: The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS rates were 86.6%, 49.5%, and 35.5%, respectively, in the PBT group and 59.5%, 34.0%, and 20.9% in the RFA group (p = 0.058); the respective OS rates were 97.6%, 77.8%, and 57.1% in the PBT group and 95.1%, 81.7%, and 67.7% in the RFA group (p = 0.16). Regarding adverse effects, no grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in the PBT; however, two grade 3 adverse events occurred within 30 days of RFA in the RFA group: one hemoperitoneum and one hemothorax.
Discussion: After propensity score matching, PBT showed no significant difference in RFS and OS compared to RFA. PBT can be an alternative for patients with solitary treatment-naïve HCC.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the stage-specific incidence trend of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among US adults.
Methods: The age-adjusted incidence rate was extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for localized, regional, and distant HCC. Trend analyses were conducted in the overall population and stratified by demographic and sociodemographic variables. The annual percentage change (APC) in 2014-2019 was estimated to determine the stage-specific incidence trend.
Results: Although the incidence of localized HCC significantly declined, the incidence for regional and distant HCC plateaued in 2014-2019 (APCs, 4.4% [95% CI, -0.2% to 9.3%] and -0.7% [95% CI, -1.8% to 0.5%], respectively) with age and race/ethnicity disparities. More pronounced increases for regional and distant HCC were observed among the elderly (APCs, 8.4% [95% CI, 4.8-12.2%] and 2.2% [95% CI, 1.7-2.7%] for regional and distant HCC, respectively), non-Hispanic white individuals (APCs, 4.0% [95% CI, 2.9-5.1%] and 1.5% [95% CI, 0.7-2.4%] for regional and distant HCC, respectively).
Conclusions: Disparities in incidence trends may reflect the inequalities in access to primary health care. More efforts are still in great demand for the vulnerable population.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：