Pub Date : 2025-01-21eCollection Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1159/000543666
Jaekyung Cheon, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Hong Jae Chon, Hyung-Don Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Beodeul Kang, Richard S Finn, Stephen Lam Chan, Changhoon Yoo
Introduction: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) has become the standard first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, data on subsequent treatment after Atezo-Bev failure are lacking. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for uHCC progression after first-line Atezo-Bev.
Methods: This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial involved two academic centers in Korea. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of HCC, prior treatment with at least 2 cycles of Atezo-Bev, and Child-Pugh A liver function. Eligible patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle (i.e., 3 weeks on, 1 week off) until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate according to RECIST v1.1, overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events.
Results: Forty patients were enrolled from December 2021 through May 2023. The median follow-up duration was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3-12.0). The median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0-3.9). The median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.1-13.8), and the 6-month OS rate was 65.0%. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 10.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (5.0%). When stratified according to time to progression on prior Atezo-Bev (first quartile [<2.3 months] vs. second to fourth quartiles [≥2.3 months]), patients with longer time to progression on prior Atezo-Bev had better OS (15.0 vs. 3.6 months, p < 0.001), objective response rate (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.009), and a tendency toward better PFS with regorafenib (3.8 vs. 2.5 months; p = 0.054).
Conclusion: Second-line regorafenib was effective for treating uHCC progression after first-line Atezo-Bev. The efficacy and safety outcomes from our study were consistent with those observed in the pivotal phase 3 RESORCE trial, which included sorafenib-tolerant/-progressed patients.
{"title":"Multicenter Phase 2 Trial of Second-Line Regorafenib in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Progression on Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab.","authors":"Jaekyung Cheon, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Hong Jae Chon, Hyung-Don Kim, Min-Hee Ryu, Kyu-Pyo Kim, Beodeul Kang, Richard S Finn, Stephen Lam Chan, Changhoon Yoo","doi":"10.1159/000543666","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000543666","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) has become the standard first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, data on subsequent treatment after Atezo-Bev failure are lacking. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for uHCC progression after first-line Atezo-Bev.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial involved two academic centers in Korea. Eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of HCC, prior treatment with at least 2 cycles of Atezo-Bev, and Child-Pugh A liver function. Eligible patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle (i.e., 3 weeks on, 1 week off) until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate according to RECIST v1.1, overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were enrolled from December 2021 through May 2023. The median follow-up duration was 10.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3-12.0). The median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI: 3.0-3.9). The median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 7.1-13.8), and the 6-month OS rate was 65.0%. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 10.0% and 82.5%, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (5.0%). When stratified according to time to progression on prior Atezo-Bev (first quartile [<2.3 months] vs. second to fourth quartiles [≥2.3 months]), patients with longer time to progression on prior Atezo-Bev had better OS (15.0 vs. 3.6 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001), objective response rate (13.3% vs. 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.009), and a tendency toward better PFS with regorafenib (3.8 vs. 2.5 months; <i>p</i> = 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Second-line regorafenib was effective for treating uHCC progression after first-line Atezo-Bev. The efficacy and safety outcomes from our study were consistent with those observed in the pivotal phase 3 RESORCE trial, which included sorafenib-tolerant/-progressed patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"446-455"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360742/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-28eCollection Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1159/000543217
Athanasios Tyraskis, Yoh Zen, Sandra Strautnieks, Riley Cook, Pierre Foskett, Claudio De Vito, Maesha Deheragoda, Alberto Quaglia, Nigel Heaton, Mark Davenport, Richard J Thompson
Introduction: Patients born with congenital porto-systemic shunts have been shown to have a high risk of benign and malignant liver tumors in otherwise healthy livers. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic landscape of liver tumors in patients with congenital porto-systemic shunts (CPSS) and correlate genotype with histological findings.
Methods: Nodules from patients with CPSS and sporadic pediatric focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) or FNH-like nodules were evaluated histologically and sequenced for a panel of 50 genes using next-generation sequencing.
Results: Thirty-eight nodules from 17 patients with CPSS were histologically classified as hepatoblastomas (n = 2), hepatocellular carcinomas (n = 4), HNF-1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) (n = 2), β-catenin-activated HCAs (n = 5), unclassified HCAs (n = 9), and FNH-like nodules (n = 16). CTNNB1 variants were detected in 26/38 nodules (68%) across different histological categories (2/2 hepatoblastomas, 4/4 HCCs, 10/16 HCAs, 10/16 FNH-like nodules), but not in sporadic FNH or FNH-like nodules (0/10). Less frequent variants were identified in APOB, GNAS, HNF1A, SERPINA1, MAML2, PTCH1, G6PC, KMT2C, DICER1, AXIN1, IL6ST and the promoter region of TERT. Germline variants were identified in AXIN1, HFE, SERPINA1, and ZNF521. CTNNB1 variants affecting amino acid positions 32 and 33 are more common in malignant tumors. Multiple CTNNB1 variants were identified in 6/7 (86%) of patients with multiple nodules, but no intratumoral variation was found.
Discussion: CPSS is strongly associated with nodules containing variants in CTNNB1, irrespective of the histological category. Areas in background liver containing these variants were also identified, and different variants could be identified in individual patients. The high proportion of CTNNB1 variants may explain the higher malignant potential of benign tumors found in CPSS.
{"title":"High Frequency of <i>CTNNB1</i> Variants Associated with Benign and Malignant Liver Tumors in Patients with Congenital Porto-Systemic Shunts.","authors":"Athanasios Tyraskis, Yoh Zen, Sandra Strautnieks, Riley Cook, Pierre Foskett, Claudio De Vito, Maesha Deheragoda, Alberto Quaglia, Nigel Heaton, Mark Davenport, Richard J Thompson","doi":"10.1159/000543217","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000543217","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients born with congenital porto-systemic shunts have been shown to have a high risk of benign and malignant liver tumors in otherwise healthy livers. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic landscape of liver tumors in patients with congenital porto-systemic shunts (CPSS) and correlate genotype with histological findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nodules from patients with CPSS and sporadic pediatric focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) or FNH-like nodules were evaluated histologically and sequenced for a panel of 50 genes using next-generation sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight nodules from 17 patients with CPSS were histologically classified as hepatoblastomas (<i>n</i> = 2), hepatocellular carcinomas (<i>n</i> = 4), HNF-1α-inactivated hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) (<i>n</i> = 2), β-catenin-activated HCAs (<i>n</i> = 5), unclassified HCAs (<i>n</i> = 9), and FNH-like nodules (<i>n</i> = 16). <i>CTNNB1</i> variants were detected in 26/38 nodules (68%) across different histological categories (2/2 hepatoblastomas, 4/4 HCCs, 10/16 HCAs, 10/16 FNH-like nodules), but not in sporadic FNH or FNH-like nodules (0/10). Less frequent variants were identified in <i>APOB</i>, <i>GNAS</i>, <i>HNF1A</i>, <i>SERPINA1</i>, <i>MAML2</i>, <i>PTCH1</i>, <i>G6PC</i>, <i>KMT2C</i>, <i>DICER1</i>, <i>AXIN1</i>, <i>IL6ST</i> and the promoter region of <i>TERT</i>. Germline variants were identified in <i>AXIN1</i>, <i>HFE</i>, <i>SERPINA1</i>, and <i>ZNF521</i>. <i>CTNNB1</i> variants affecting amino acid positions 32 and 33 are more common in malignant tumors. Multiple <i>CTNNB1</i> variants were identified in 6/7 (86%) of patients with multiple nodules, but no intratumoral variation was found.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CPSS is strongly associated with nodules containing variants in <i>CTNNB1</i>, irrespective of the histological category. Areas in background liver containing these variants were also identified, and different variants could be identified in individual patients. The high proportion of <i>CTNNB1</i> variants may explain the higher malignant potential of benign tumors found in CPSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"408-419"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-20eCollection Date: 2025-03-01DOI: 10.1159/000543245
Masatoshi Kudo
{"title":"Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Masatoshi Kudo","doi":"10.1159/000543245","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000543245","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936454/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143719865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18eCollection Date: 2025-08-01DOI: 10.1159/000542285
Yoon Jun Kim, Philippe Merle, Richard S Finn, Masatoshi Kudo, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Ho Yeong Lim, Masafumi Ikeda, Alessandro Granito, Gianluca Masi, René Gerolami, Sung Bum Cho, Chih-Hung Hsu, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Long-Bin Jeng, Do Young Kim, Shi-Ming Lin, Matthias Pinter, Guoliang Shao, Naoya Kato, Masayuki Kurosaki, Kazushi Numata, Kung-Kai Kuo, Yilei Mao, Yih-Jyh Lin, Kangshun Zhu, Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, Javeed Khan, Maria Awan, Kirhan Ozgurdal, Shukui Qin
Introduction: In the phase 3 RESORCE trial, regorafenib prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) whose disease progressed on prior sorafenib. The prospective, observational REFINE study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broader population of patients in real-world clinical practice, including patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, Child-Pugh B liver status, and sorafenib intolerance.
Methods: This international, prospective, multicenter study (NCT03289273) enrolled patients with uHCC for whom the decision to treat with regorafenib was made by their physician before enrollment, according to the local health authority-approved label. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib, including the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dose modifications due to TEAEs.
Results: Of the 1,028 patients enrolled, 1,005 initiated regorafenib and were eligible for analysis. Median age was 66 years (range 21-94); most patients were male (83%), Child-Pugh A (61%), and had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (82%) at study entry. Overall, 47%, 11%, and 40% of patients initiated regorafenib at 160, 120, and 80 mg/day, respectively. Median treatment duration was 3.7 months (range 1 day to 38.9 months). Dose modifications and permanent discontinuation of regorafenib due to TEAEs occurred in 45% and 31% of patients, respectively. The most common drug-related TEAEs were hand-foot skin reaction (31%), diarrhea (26%), and fatigue (15%). Median OS was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval 11.6, 14.8).
Conclusion: The results of the real-world REFINE study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broad population of patients with uHCC. Of patients who received standard regorafenib dosing in REFINE, safety and efficacy findings were consistent with those reported in the RESORCE trial.
{"title":"Regorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Practice (REFINE): A Prospective, Observational Study.","authors":"Yoon Jun Kim, Philippe Merle, Richard S Finn, Masatoshi Kudo, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Ho Yeong Lim, Masafumi Ikeda, Alessandro Granito, Gianluca Masi, René Gerolami, Sung Bum Cho, Chih-Hung Hsu, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Long-Bin Jeng, Do Young Kim, Shi-Ming Lin, Matthias Pinter, Guoliang Shao, Naoya Kato, Masayuki Kurosaki, Kazushi Numata, Kung-Kai Kuo, Yilei Mao, Yih-Jyh Lin, Kangshun Zhu, Philip Twumasi-Ankrah, Javeed Khan, Maria Awan, Kirhan Ozgurdal, Shukui Qin","doi":"10.1159/000542285","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the phase 3 RESORCE trial, regorafenib prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) whose disease progressed on prior sorafenib. The prospective, observational REFINE study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broader population of patients in real-world clinical practice, including patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, Child-Pugh B liver status, and sorafenib intolerance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, prospective, multicenter study (NCT03289273) enrolled patients with uHCC for whom the decision to treat with regorafenib was made by their physician before enrollment, according to the local health authority-approved label. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib, including the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and dose modifications due to TEAEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,028 patients enrolled, 1,005 initiated regorafenib and were eligible for analysis. Median age was 66 years (range 21-94); most patients were male (83%), Child-Pugh A (61%), and had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 (82%) at study entry. Overall, 47%, 11%, and 40% of patients initiated regorafenib at 160, 120, and 80 mg/day, respectively. Median treatment duration was 3.7 months (range 1 day to 38.9 months). Dose modifications and permanent discontinuation of regorafenib due to TEAEs occurred in 45% and 31% of patients, respectively. The most common drug-related TEAEs were hand-foot skin reaction (31%), diarrhea (26%), and fatigue (15%). Median OS was 13.2 months (95% confidence interval 11.6, 14.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the real-world REFINE study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in a broad population of patients with uHCC. Of patients who received standard regorafenib dosing in REFINE, safety and efficacy findings were consistent with those reported in the RESORCE trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"391-407"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the effects of adjuvant ICI treatment duration on RFS and overall survival (OS) among patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence.
Methods: The RFS and OS of patients from three centers who received either adjuvant ICI therapy or active surveillance after curative hepatic resection between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023, were analyzed. Further analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of ICI treatment duration on RFS and OS.
Results: A total of 1,271 patients were included, of whom 1,032 (81.2%) received active surveillance and 239 (18.8%) received adjuvant ICI therapy. The median RFS in the adjuvant therapy cohort was 22.6 months (95% CI 18.3-26.9), significantly higher than the RFS of 19.1 months (95% CI 16.4-21.4) in the active surveillance cohort (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.95; p = 0.019). The median OS was not reached for either group, but OS tended to be better in the adjuvant therapy cohort than in the active surveillance group (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; p = 0.010). Similar results were obtained after propensity score matching. Among patients who received adjuvant ICI therapy, those who received it for longer than 6 months had slightly higher RFS (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.04; p = 0.071) and OS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.17; p = 0.128) than those who received it for up to 6 months.
Conclusions: Adjuvant ICI therapy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence after curative resection. Six months of adjuvant ICI treatment may be insufficient.
佐剂免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)可能改善肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的无复发生存率(RFS)。本研究评估了辅助ICI治疗时间对复发高危HCC患者RFS和总生存期(OS)的影响。方法:分析2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间,来自三个中心的肝切除术后接受辅助ICI治疗或积极监测的患者的RFS和OS。进一步分析ICI治疗时间对RFS和OS的影响。结果:共纳入1271例患者,其中1032例(81.2%)接受了主动监测,239例(18.8%)接受了辅助ICI治疗。辅助治疗组的中位RFS为22.6个月(95% CI 18.3-26.9),显著高于主动监测组的19.1个月(95% CI 16.4-21.4) (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.95; p = 0.019)。两组的中位OS均未达到,但辅助治疗组的OS往往优于主动监测组(HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; p = 0.010)。倾向评分匹配后得到相似的结果。在接受辅助ICI治疗的患者中,接受辅助ICI治疗超过6个月的患者的RFS (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.04; p = 0.071)和OS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.17; p = 0.128)略高于接受辅助ICI治疗6个月的患者。结论:辅助ICI治疗可显著改善高复发风险HCC患者根治切除后的预后。6个月的辅助ICI治疗可能不够。
{"title":"Treatment Duration of Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients at High Risk of Recurrence after Resection: A Prospective, Multicentric Cohort Study.","authors":"Jia-Yong Su, Shao-Ping Liu, Xiao-Ling Xu, Jun-Jie Ou, Po-Hua Ye, Bin-Tong Zhao, Jia-Song Chen, Qiu-Mei Luo, Jin-Rong Liu, Fei-Min Tang, Jian-Rong Li, Da-Long Yang, Zhu-Jian Deng, Li-Xin Pan, Yao-Jie Li, Le Li, Zhen-Ming Qin, Xiu-Mei Liang, Yi-Li Ma, Liang Ma, Jian-Hong Zhong","doi":"10.1159/000542954","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the effects of adjuvant ICI treatment duration on RFS and overall survival (OS) among patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RFS and OS of patients from three centers who received either adjuvant ICI therapy or active surveillance after curative hepatic resection between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023, were analyzed. Further analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of ICI treatment duration on RFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,271 patients were included, of whom 1,032 (81.2%) received active surveillance and 239 (18.8%) received adjuvant ICI therapy. The median RFS in the adjuvant therapy cohort was 22.6 months (95% CI 18.3-26.9), significantly higher than the RFS of 19.1 months (95% CI 16.4-21.4) in the active surveillance cohort (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.019). The median OS was not reached for either group, but OS tended to be better in the adjuvant therapy cohort than in the active surveillance group (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; <i>p</i> = 0.010). Similar results were obtained after propensity score matching. Among patients who received adjuvant ICI therapy, those who received it for longer than 6 months had slightly higher RFS (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.04; <i>p</i> = 0.071) and OS (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.128) than those who received it for up to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjuvant ICI therapy significantly improves the prognosis of patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence after curative resection. Six months of adjuvant ICI treatment may be insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"378-390"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360747/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: CD8+ T cells are critical for the oncogenesis and progression of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor microenvironment, receiving antigen signals from antigen-presenting cells and directly contributing to antitumor responses.
Summary: CD8+ T cells mediate immunogenic cell death, facilitate immune signal transmission, and play a significant role in various treatments, including surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, and immunotherapy. Extensive research on the role of CD8+ T cells within the HCC microenvironment has shown considerable progress. Immunometabolic targets on CD8+ T cells have demonstrated potential in combination with immunotherapies for HCC; however, they have not yet reached the clinical trial stage.
Key messages: This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent research on immune and immunometabolic targets of CD8+ T cells within the HCC microenvironment. By highlighting advances and potential mechanisms, this review aims to support the development of effective clinical strategies in this field.
{"title":"Immunometabolic Targets in CD8<sup>+</sup> T Cells within the Tumor Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Yanze Lin, Rexiati Ruze, Ruiqing Zhang, Talaiti Tuergan, Maolin Wang, Alimu Tulahong, Dalong Zhu, Zhongdian Yuan, Tiemin Jiang, Tuerganaili Aji, Yingmei Shao","doi":"10.1159/000542578","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells are critical for the oncogenesis and progression of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor microenvironment, receiving antigen signals from antigen-presenting cells and directly contributing to antitumor responses.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells mediate immunogenic cell death, facilitate immune signal transmission, and play a significant role in various treatments, including surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, and immunotherapy. Extensive research on the role of CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells within the HCC microenvironment has shown considerable progress. Immunometabolic targets on CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells have demonstrated potential in combination with immunotherapies for HCC; however, they have not yet reached the clinical trial stage.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent research on immune and immunometabolic targets of CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells within the HCC microenvironment. By highlighting advances and potential mechanisms, this review aims to support the development of effective clinical strategies in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"474-496"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The phase 3 LEAP-002 study (NCT03713593) of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggested improved antitumor activity of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib alone with manageable safety, although overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not reach prespecified statistical significance. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety in Japanese patients.
Methods: Patients with advanced HCC without prior systemic treatment were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 8 mg (body weight <60 kg) or 12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) oral lenvatinib once daily plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Dual primary end points were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and time to progression per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety.
Results: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled in Japan (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, n = 39; lenvatinib plus placebo, n = 41). Median time from randomization to database cutoff (June 21, 2022) was 34.1 months (range: 26.9-39.6). Median OS was 31.4 months (95% CI: 21.2- not reached) for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 21.4 months (95% CI: 14.4-25.4) for lenvatinib plus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.31-0.96]). Median PFS for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.2-18.5) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 6.0-8.3) for lenvatinib plus placebo (HR = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.32-0.90]). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26 patients (67%) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 24 patients (59%) in the lenvatinib plus placebo group.
Conclusion: In Japanese patients enrolled in LEAP-002, findings were consistent with the global population where OS and PFS trended toward improvement; a similar safety profile was observed.
{"title":"First-Line Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Post hoc Analysis of Japanese Patients from the Phase 3 LEAP-002 Trial.","authors":"Masatoshi Kudo, Masafumi Ikeda, Hiroshi Aikata, Kazushi Numata, Hiroyuki Marusawa, Tetsuya Hosaka, Naoya Kato, Masayuki Kurosaki, Manabu Morimoto, Tatsuya Yamashita, Hironori Koga, Tsutomu Masaki, Naoyoshi Yatsuzuka, Masato Suzuki, Satoshi Nagao, Shuichi Kaneko, Hiromitsu Kumada","doi":"10.1159/000542572","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The phase 3 LEAP-002 study (NCT03713593) of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suggested improved antitumor activity of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus lenvatinib alone with manageable safety, although overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) did not reach prespecified statistical significance. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety in Japanese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with advanced HCC without prior systemic treatment were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 8 mg (body weight <60 kg) or 12 mg (body weight ≥60 kg) oral lenvatinib once daily plus 200 mg intravenous pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Dual primary end points were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and time to progression per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 80 patients were enrolled in Japan (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, <i>n</i> = 39; lenvatinib plus placebo, <i>n</i> = 41). Median time from randomization to database cutoff (June 21, 2022) was 34.1 months (range: 26.9-39.6). Median OS was 31.4 months (95% CI: 21.2- not reached) for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 21.4 months (95% CI: 14.4-25.4) for lenvatinib plus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.31-0.96]). Median PFS for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.2-18.5) and 6.5 months (95% CI: 6.0-8.3) for lenvatinib plus placebo (HR = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.32-0.90]). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 26 patients (67%) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 24 patients (59%) in the lenvatinib plus placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Japanese patients enrolled in LEAP-002, findings were consistent with the global population where OS and PFS trended toward improvement; a similar safety profile was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 4","pages":"365-377"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360741/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: In the realm of oncology, the pinnacle of therapeutic success is achieving a state where the patient is entirely free of cancer, i.e., "cancer free." This benchmark should not only apply to early-stage malignancies but should also be the standard aim for advanced-stage diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is a glaring gap in the research landscape concerning the understanding of what cancer-free status truly means for advanced-stage HCC. Our study sheds light on the profound implications of reaching a cancer-free by radiologic assessments in patients with advanced-stage HCC.
Methods: We established a database tracking the full clinical course of all patients with HCC (from 2003 to 2022). We identified the initial instances of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. We defined radiologic cancer-free (rCF) as cases in which no recurrence was observed for at least 2 months following curative treatment or complete response to systemic therapies. The frequency of achieving rCF status was investigated, categorized by patients' background.
Results: We identified 795 patients with advanced-stage HCC. The rCF rate was 8.7%. Patients who achieved rCF status had significantly better prognoses compared to those who did not (p < 0.001). In the decision tree analysis, the number of tumors ≥8 was the strongest factor, making it difficult to achieve rCF status. Analysis of stage progression patterns revealed varying background characteristics at the time of advanced-stage diagnosis, with discrepancies in rCF rates.
Conclusions: Despite the low rate of achieving rCF status, the prognostic impact was significant. Patients with certain tumor characteristics had a higher likelihood of achieving rCF status. The distribution of tumor conditions varies based on the pattern of progression, which affects the likelihood of achieving an rCF status.
{"title":"Comprehensive Analysis of Radiologic Cancer-Free Status through Various Treatment Approaches in Advanced-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Keisuke Koroki, Sadahisa Ogasawara, Ryo Izai, Takuya Yonemoto, Teppei Akatsuka, Chihiro Miwa, Sae Yumita, Masanori Inoue, Kazufumi Kobayashi, Soichiro Kiyono, Masato Nakamura, Naoya Kanogawa, Takayuki Kondo, Shingo Nakamoto, Shinichiro Nakada, Nozomu Sakai, Masayuki Yokoyama, Masayuki Ohtsuka, Naoya Kato","doi":"10.1159/000542577","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the realm of oncology, the pinnacle of therapeutic success is achieving a state where the patient is entirely free of cancer, i.e., \"cancer free.\" This benchmark should not only apply to early-stage malignancies but should also be the standard aim for advanced-stage diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is a glaring gap in the research landscape concerning the understanding of what cancer-free status truly means for advanced-stage HCC. Our study sheds light on the profound implications of reaching a cancer-free by radiologic assessments in patients with advanced-stage HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We established a database tracking the full clinical course of all patients with HCC (from 2003 to 2022). We identified the initial instances of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread. We defined radiologic cancer-free (rCF) as cases in which no recurrence was observed for at least 2 months following curative treatment or complete response to systemic therapies. The frequency of achieving rCF status was investigated, categorized by patients' background.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 795 patients with advanced-stage HCC. The rCF rate was 8.7%. Patients who achieved rCF status had significantly better prognoses compared to those who did not (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the decision tree analysis, the number of tumors ≥8 was the strongest factor, making it difficult to achieve rCF status. Analysis of stage progression patterns revealed varying background characteristics at the time of advanced-stage diagnosis, with discrepancies in rCF rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the low rate of achieving rCF status, the prognostic impact was significant. Patients with certain tumor characteristics had a higher likelihood of achieving rCF status. The distribution of tumor conditions varies based on the pattern of progression, which affects the likelihood of achieving an rCF status.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 3","pages":"286-301"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144475839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-13eCollection Date: 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1159/000542576
Yu-Yun Shao, Andrei R Akhmetzhanov
Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are fundamental in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Considering previous reports implied varied responses among patient subgroups, such as patients with different hepatitis etiologies, we planned this meta-analysis to identify specific populations that might derive greater survival benefits from ICIs as a first-line treatment.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library for phase III clinical trials comparing ICIs and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) as first-line therapies for advanced HCC. We extracted and synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival across different patient subgroups mainly using the random-effect model.
Results: Our analysis included nine phase III trials involving ICIs, either alone or in combination with other treatments, compared with MKIs. The synthesized HRs for patients with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and nonviral etiologies were 0.74, 0.77, and 0.86, respectively, showing no significant differences (p = 0.13). Such finding remained when we only analyzed clinical trials with positive results. HRs consistently favored ICIs across various demographics such as age, sex, geographic region, performance status, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and disease stage or extent. Notably, patients with extrahepatic spread showed a trend toward better outcomes (HR 0.73) compared to those without (HR 0.85, p = 0.07).
Conclusion: The efficacy of ICIs as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC was consistent across diverse patient subgroups, regardless of hepatitis etiology or other demographic factors. These findings do not support using these characteristics to determine the use of ICI therapy in advanced HCC.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的基础。考虑到先前的报道暗示不同患者亚组(如不同肝炎病因的患者)的反应不同,我们计划进行这项荟萃分析,以确定可能从ICIs作为一线治疗中获得更大生存益处的特定人群。方法:我们在PubMed和Cochrane文库中进行了全面搜索,比较ICIs和多激酶抑制剂(MKIs)作为晚期HCC一线治疗的III期临床试验。我们主要使用随机效应模型提取并综合了不同患者亚组总生存率的风险比(hr)。结果:我们的分析包括9个涉及ICIs的III期试验,与MKIs相比,无论是单独使用还是与其他治疗联合使用。乙型肝炎病毒、丙型肝炎病毒和非病毒性病因患者的综合hr分别为0.74、0.77和0.86,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.13)。当我们只分析有阳性结果的临床试验时,这一发现仍然存在。在不同的人口统计数据中,如年龄、性别、地理区域、性能状况、甲胎蛋白水平、疾病分期或程度等,hr始终青睐于ICIs。值得注意的是,与没有肝外扩散的患者相比,肝外扩散患者表现出更好的预后趋势(HR 0.73) (HR 0.85, p = 0.07)。结论:在不同的患者亚组中,无论肝炎病因或其他人口统计学因素如何,ICIs作为晚期HCC一线治疗的疗效是一致的。这些发现不支持使用这些特征来确定晚期HCC中ICI治疗的使用。
{"title":"Demographics and Immunotherapy Efficacy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase III Clinical Trials.","authors":"Yu-Yun Shao, Andrei R Akhmetzhanov","doi":"10.1159/000542576","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000542576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are fundamental in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Considering previous reports implied varied responses among patient subgroups, such as patients with different hepatitis etiologies, we planned this meta-analysis to identify specific populations that might derive greater survival benefits from ICIs as a first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library for phase III clinical trials comparing ICIs and multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) as first-line therapies for advanced HCC. We extracted and synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival across different patient subgroups mainly using the random-effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis included nine phase III trials involving ICIs, either alone or in combination with other treatments, compared with MKIs. The synthesized HRs for patients with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and nonviral etiologies were 0.74, 0.77, and 0.86, respectively, showing no significant differences (<i>p</i> = 0.13). Such finding remained when we only analyzed clinical trials with positive results. HRs consistently favored ICIs across various demographics such as age, sex, geographic region, performance status, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and disease stage or extent. Notably, patients with extrahepatic spread showed a trend toward better outcomes (HR 0.73) compared to those without (HR 0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of ICIs as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC was consistent across diverse patient subgroups, regardless of hepatitis etiology or other demographic factors. These findings do not support using these characteristics to determine the use of ICI therapy in advanced HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 3","pages":"302-310"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12180893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144475840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}