首页 > 最新文献

Liver Cancer最新文献

英文 中文
Radiologic Patterns Determine the Outcomes of Initial and Subsequent Transarterial Chemoembolization in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 放射学模式决定中晚期肝细胞癌首次和后续经动脉化疗栓塞术的疗效
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-15 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530950
Ya-Wen Hung, I-Cheng Lee, Chen-Ta Chi, Rheun-Chuan Lee, Chien-An Liu, Nai-Chi Chiu, Hsuen-En Hwang, Yee Chao, Ming-Chih Hou, Yi-Hsiang Huang

Introduction: Outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diverse because of the heterogeneity of tumor burden. Radiologic pattern is one criterion for determining whether TACE is unsuitable. However, additional evidence is required. This study determined the influence of radiologic morphology on the outcomes of initial and subsequent TACE.

Methods: From January 2007 to September 2021, 633 treatment-naive patients with HCC with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE were retrospectively enrolled. Of these patients, 386 patients received repeated TACE. The radiological features of HCC were evaluated by two radiologists and classified into encapsulated nodular type, simple nodular type with extranodular growth, confluent multinodular type, and infiltrative type. The objective response rate (ORR) and survival rate after initial and subsequent TACE among various radiologic morphologies were compared.

Results: After initial TACE, encapsulated nodular type HCC had the highest ORR (58%), followed by extranodular type (45.8%), confluent multinodular type (29%), and infiltrative type (19.5%). Notably, radiologic pattern was highly associated with tumor burden. Tumor burden and radiologic morphology were significantly associated with ORR and overall survival (OS) in the multivariate analysis. In 386 patients with subsequent TACE, encapsulated nodular type HCC had the highest ORR (48.7%), followed by extranodular type (37.3%), confluent multinodular type (26.2%), and infiltrative type (10%). In the multivariate analysis, radiologic features were significant independent predictors of ORR and OS after receiving subsequent TACE.

Conclusion: Radiologic patterns determine the outcomes of initial and subsequent TACE. Systemic therapy should be considered for patients with intermediate-stage HCC with unfavorable radiologic patterns.

简介:由于肿瘤负荷的异质性,经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗中期肝细胞癌(HCC)的结果多种多样。放射学模式是确定 TACE 是否不适合的标准之一。但是,还需要更多的证据。本研究确定了放射学形态对初次和后续 TACE 结果的影响:2007年1月至2021年9月期间,回顾性纳入了633名接受TACE的中晚期HCC患者。其中,386 名患者接受了重复 TACE。两名放射科医生对HCC的放射学特征进行了评估,并将其分为包裹结节型、伴有结节外生长的单纯结节型、汇合多结节型和浸润型。比较了不同放射学形态初次TACE和后续TACE后的客观反应率(ORR)和生存率:结果:初次TACE后,包裹结节型HCC的ORR最高(58%),其次是结节外型(45.8%)、汇合多结节型(29%)和浸润型(19.5%)。值得注意的是,放射学形态与肿瘤负荷高度相关。在多变量分析中,肿瘤负荷和放射学形态与ORR和总生存率(OS)显著相关。在386名接受TACE治疗的患者中,包裹结节型HCC的ORR最高(48.7%),其次是结节外型(37.3%)、汇合多结节型(26.2%)和浸润型(10%)。在多变量分析中,放射学特征是后续TACE治疗后ORR和OS的重要独立预测因素:结论:放射学模式决定了初次和后续 TACE 的疗效。结论:放射学模式决定了初次和后续 TACE 的疗效,对于放射学模式不佳的中晚期 HCC 患者,应考虑进行系统治疗。
{"title":"Radiologic Patterns Determine the Outcomes of Initial and Subsequent Transarterial Chemoembolization in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Ya-Wen Hung, I-Cheng Lee, Chen-Ta Chi, Rheun-Chuan Lee, Chien-An Liu, Nai-Chi Chiu, Hsuen-En Hwang, Yee Chao, Ming-Chih Hou, Yi-Hsiang Huang","doi":"10.1159/000530950","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diverse because of the heterogeneity of tumor burden. Radiologic pattern is one criterion for determining whether TACE is unsuitable. However, additional evidence is required. This study determined the influence of radiologic morphology on the outcomes of initial and subsequent TACE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2007 to September 2021, 633 treatment-naive patients with HCC with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing TACE were retrospectively enrolled. Of these patients, 386 patients received repeated TACE. The radiological features of HCC were evaluated by two radiologists and classified into encapsulated nodular type, simple nodular type with extranodular growth, confluent multinodular type, and infiltrative type. The objective response rate (ORR) and survival rate after initial and subsequent TACE among various radiologic morphologies were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After initial TACE, encapsulated nodular type HCC had the highest ORR (58%), followed by extranodular type (45.8%), confluent multinodular type (29%), and infiltrative type (19.5%). Notably, radiologic pattern was highly associated with tumor burden. Tumor burden and radiologic morphology were significantly associated with ORR and overall survival (OS) in the multivariate analysis. In 386 patients with subsequent TACE, encapsulated nodular type HCC had the highest ORR (48.7%), followed by extranodular type (37.3%), confluent multinodular type (26.2%), and infiltrative type (10%). In the multivariate analysis, radiologic features were significant independent predictors of ORR and OS after receiving subsequent TACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiologic patterns determine the outcomes of initial and subsequent TACE. Systemic therapy should be considered for patients with intermediate-stage HCC with unfavorable radiologic patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857819/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77255720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence of Hyper Progressive Disease in Combination Immunotherapy and Anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Monotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 联合免疫疗法和抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 单一疗法治疗无法切除的肝细胞癌的超进展性疾病发生率。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-11 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1159/000531024
Tomoko Aoki, Masatoshi Kudo, Kazuomi Ueshima, Masahiro Morita, Hirokazu Chishina, Masahiro Takita, Satoru Hagiwara, Hiroshi Ida, Yasunori Minami, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Naoshi Nishida

Introduction: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling blockade is the most effective strategy for the treatment of immune evading hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While immune checkpoint inhibitor has revolutionized the concept of cancer treatment, it has also led to unexpected tumor growth. Regulatory T cells express PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) receptors, which are proliferated and activated by antibody binding, and their ratio to CD8+ T cells is altered, which is one of the causes for hyper progressive disease (HPD). We examined the frequency of HPD in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and combination therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.

Methods: This was a prospective and retrospective cohort study which enrolled 198 patients with unresectable HCC from January 2015 to December 2021 at the Kindai University Hospital. Fifty-eight patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, 119 patients combination with VEGF antibody, and 21 patients combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. We defined HPD as tumor growth rate (TGR) ratio ≥4, ΔTGR ≥40%, and tumor growth kinetics ratio ≥4.

Results: The HPD rate was 10.3% (6/58) in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, 1.7% (2/119) in combination with VEGF antibody, and 4.8% (1/21) in combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody (p = 0.034). The odds ratio for HPD in the combined anti-CTLA-4 antibody group was 0.433 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-3.83) when compared to the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy group and 2.93 (95% CI: 0.25-33.79) when compared to the combined VEGF antibody group.

Conclusion: The frequency of HPD in unresectable HCC compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was decreased with the combination with anti-VEGF antibody and not increased with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody is now available in real-world and needs to be further validated with accumulated clinical practice.

导言:程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)信号阻断是治疗免疫逃避型肝细胞癌(HCC)的最有效策略。免疫检查点抑制剂在彻底改变癌症治疗理念的同时,也导致了意想不到的肿瘤生长。调节性T细胞表达PD-1和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(CTLA-4)受体,与抗体结合后会增殖和活化,它们与CD8+ T细胞的比例会发生改变,这是导致超进展性疾病(HPD)的原因之一。我们研究了抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗以及与血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抗体和抗CTLA-4抗体联合治疗中HPD的发生频率:这是一项前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,从2015年1月至2021年12月在日本金台大学医院招募了198名无法切除的HCC患者。58名患者接受了抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗,119名患者接受了VEGF抗体联合治疗,21名患者接受了抗CTLA-4抗体联合治疗。我们将肿瘤生长率(TGR)比值≥4、ΔTGR≥40%、肿瘤生长动力学比值≥4定义为HPD:抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗的HPD率为10.3%(6/58),与VEGF抗体联合治疗的HPD率为1.7%(2/119),与抗CTLA-4抗体联合治疗的HPD率为4.8%(1/21)(p = 0.034)。与抗PD-1/PD-L1单药组相比,联合抗CTLA-4抗体组的HPD几率比为0.433(95%置信区间[CI]:0.05-3.83);与联合VEGF抗体组相比,联合抗CTLA-4抗体组的HPD几率比为2.93(95% CI:0.25-33.79):结论:与抗PD-1/PD-L1单药治疗相比,联合抗血管内皮生长因子抗体可降低不可切除HCC的HPD发生率,而联合抗CTLA-4抗体则不会增加HPD发生率。抗PD-1/PD-L1联合抗CTLA-4抗体目前已在现实世界中应用,还需要临床实践的进一步验证。
{"title":"Incidence of Hyper Progressive Disease in Combination Immunotherapy and Anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Monotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Tomoko Aoki, Masatoshi Kudo, Kazuomi Ueshima, Masahiro Morita, Hirokazu Chishina, Masahiro Takita, Satoru Hagiwara, Hiroshi Ida, Yasunori Minami, Masakatsu Tsurusaki, Naoshi Nishida","doi":"10.1159/000531024","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000531024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) signaling blockade is the most effective strategy for the treatment of immune evading hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While immune checkpoint inhibitor has revolutionized the concept of cancer treatment, it has also led to unexpected tumor growth. Regulatory T cells express PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) receptors, which are proliferated and activated by antibody binding, and their ratio to CD8+ T cells is altered, which is one of the causes for hyper progressive disease (HPD). We examined the frequency of HPD in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and combination therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective and retrospective cohort study which enrolled 198 patients with unresectable HCC from January 2015 to December 2021 at the Kindai University Hospital. Fifty-eight patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, 119 patients combination with VEGF antibody, and 21 patients combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. We defined HPD as tumor growth rate (TGR) ratio ≥4, ΔTGR ≥40%, and tumor growth kinetics ratio ≥4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HPD rate was 10.3% (6/58) in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, 1.7% (2/119) in combination with VEGF antibody, and 4.8% (1/21) in combination with anti-CTLA-4 antibody (<i>p</i> = 0.034). The odds ratio for HPD in the combined anti-CTLA-4 antibody group was 0.433 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-3.83) when compared to the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy group and 2.93 (95% CI: 0.25-33.79) when compared to the combined VEGF antibody group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequency of HPD in unresectable HCC compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was decreased with the combination with anti-VEGF antibody and not increased with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody is now available in real-world and needs to be further validated with accumulated clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857830/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78394983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deficient Immune Response following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Hepatobiliary Carcinoma: A Forgotten, Vulnerable Group of Patients. 肝胆癌患者接种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗后免疫反应不足:被遗忘的弱势患者群体。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-05-10 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1159/000529608
Malte B Monin, Leona I Baier, Jens G Gorny, Moritz Berger, Taotao Zhou, Robert Mahn, Farsaneh Sadeghlar, Christian Möhring, Christoph Boesecke, Kathrin van Bremen, Jürgen K Rockstroh, Christian P Strassburg, Anna-Maria Eis-Hübinger, Matthias Schmid, Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona

Introduction: Data on immune response rates following vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma (HBC) are rare. However, impaired immunogenicity must be expected due to the combination of chronic liver diseases (CLDs) with malignancy and anticancer treatment.

Methods: In this prospective, longitudinal study, 101 patients were included, of whom 59 were patients with HBC under anticancer treatment. A cohort of patients with a past medical history of gastrointestinal cancer, of whom 28.6% had HBC without detectable active tumor disease having been off therapy for at least 12 months, served as control. Levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG, surrogate neutralization antibodies (sNABs), and cellular immune responses were compared. In uni- and multivariable subgroup analyses, risk factors for impaired immunogenicity were regarded. Data on rates and clinical courses of SARS-CoV-2 infections were documented.

Results: In patients with HBC under active treatment, levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG were significantly lower (2.55 log10 BAU/mL; 95% CI: 2.33-2.76; p < 0.01) than in patients in follow-up care (3.02 log10 BAU/mL; 95% CI: 2.80-3.25) 4 weeks after two vaccinations. Antibody levels decreased over time, and differences between the groups diminished. However, titers of SARS-CoV-2 sNAB were for a longer time significantly lower in patients with HBC under treatment (64.19%; 95% CI: 55.90-72.48; p < 0.01) than in patients in follow-up care (84.13%; 95% CI: 76.95-91.31). Underlying CLD and/or liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B (less than 8 points) did not seem to further impair immunogenicity. Conversely, chemotherapy and additional immunosuppression were found to significantly reduce antibody levels. After a third booster vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, levels of total and neutralization antibodies were equalized between the groups. Moreover, cellular response rates were balanced. Clinically, infection rates with SARS-CoV-2 were low, and no severe courses were observed.

Conclusion: Patients with active HBC showed significantly impaired immune response rates to basic vaccinations for SARS-CoV-2, especially under chemotherapy, independent of underlying cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CLD. Although booster vaccinations balanced differences, waning immunity was observed over time and should be monitored for further recommendations. Our data help clinicians decide on individual additional booster vaccinations and/or passive immunization or antiviral treatment in patients with HBC getting infected with SARS-CoV-2.

引言:肝胆癌(HBC)患者接种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫苗后的免疫应答率数据很少。然而,由于慢性肝病(CLD)与恶性肿瘤和抗癌治疗的结合,免疫原性必须受损。方法:在这项前瞻性纵向研究中,纳入了101名患者,其中59名是正在接受抗癌治疗的HBC患者。一组既往有胃肠道癌症病史的患者作为对照,其中28.6%的患者患有HBC,但未检测到活动性肿瘤疾病,已停止治疗至少12个月。比较了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗刺突IgG、替代中和抗体(sNABs)和细胞免疫反应的水平。在单因素和多因素亚组分析中,考虑了免疫原性受损的危险因素。记录了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染率和临床病程的数据。结果:在接受积极治疗的HBC患者中,两次接种疫苗4周后,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型抗刺突IgG水平(2.55 log10 BAU/mL;95%可信区间:2.33-2.76;p<0.01)显著低于接受随访的患者(3.02 log10 BAU/mL;95%置信区间:2.80-3.25)。抗体水平随着时间的推移而下降,两组之间的差异也减少了。然而,在更长的时间内,接受治疗的HBC患者的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型sNAB滴度(64.19%;95%可信区间:55.90-72.48;p<0.01)显著低于接受后续护理的患者(84.13%;95%置信区间:76.95-91.31)。潜在的CLD和/或肝硬化Child-Pugh a或B(低于8分)似乎没有进一步损害免疫原性。相反,化疗和额外的免疫抑制被发现可以显著降低抗体水平。在第三次接种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型加强针后,两组之间的总抗体和中和抗体水平持平。此外,细胞反应率是平衡的。临床上,严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的感染率较低,没有观察到严重的病程。结论:活动性HBC患者对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型基础疫苗的免疫应答率显著受损,尤其是在化疗期间,与潜在的肝硬化或非肝硬化CLD无关。尽管加强疫苗接种平衡了差异,但随着时间的推移,免疫力下降,应进行监测,以获得进一步的建议。我们的数据有助于临床医生决定对感染严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的HBC患者进行个人额外的加强针接种和/或被动免疫或抗病毒治疗。
{"title":"Deficient Immune Response following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients with Hepatobiliary Carcinoma: A Forgotten, Vulnerable Group of Patients.","authors":"Malte B Monin,&nbsp;Leona I Baier,&nbsp;Jens G Gorny,&nbsp;Moritz Berger,&nbsp;Taotao Zhou,&nbsp;Robert Mahn,&nbsp;Farsaneh Sadeghlar,&nbsp;Christian Möhring,&nbsp;Christoph Boesecke,&nbsp;Kathrin van Bremen,&nbsp;Jürgen K Rockstroh,&nbsp;Christian P Strassburg,&nbsp;Anna-Maria Eis-Hübinger,&nbsp;Matthias Schmid,&nbsp;Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona","doi":"10.1159/000529608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529608","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on immune response rates following vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with hepatobiliary carcinoma (HBC) are rare. However, impaired immunogenicity must be expected due to the combination of chronic liver diseases (CLDs) with malignancy and anticancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, longitudinal study, 101 patients were included, of whom 59 were patients with HBC under anticancer treatment. A cohort of patients with a past medical history of gastrointestinal cancer, of whom 28.6% had HBC without detectable active tumor disease having been off therapy for at least 12 months, served as control. Levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG, surrogate neutralization antibodies (sNABs), and cellular immune responses were compared. In uni- and multivariable subgroup analyses, risk factors for impaired immunogenicity were regarded. Data on rates and clinical courses of SARS-CoV-2 infections were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with HBC under active treatment, levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG were significantly lower (2.55 log<sub>10</sub> BAU/mL; 95% CI: 2.33-2.76; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in patients in follow-up care (3.02 log<sub>10</sub> BAU/mL; 95% CI: 2.80-3.25) 4 weeks after two vaccinations. Antibody levels decreased over time, and differences between the groups diminished. However, titers of SARS-CoV-2 sNAB were for a longer time significantly lower in patients with HBC under treatment (64.19%; 95% CI: 55.90-72.48; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in patients in follow-up care (84.13%; 95% CI: 76.95-91.31). Underlying CLD and/or liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh A or B (less than 8 points) did not seem to further impair immunogenicity. Conversely, chemotherapy and additional immunosuppression were found to significantly reduce antibody levels. After a third booster vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, levels of total and neutralization antibodies were equalized between the groups. Moreover, cellular response rates were balanced. Clinically, infection rates with SARS-CoV-2 were low, and no severe courses were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with active HBC showed significantly impaired immune response rates to basic vaccinations for SARS-CoV-2, especially under chemotherapy, independent of underlying cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic CLD. Although booster vaccinations balanced differences, waning immunity was observed over time and should be monitored for further recommendations. Our data help clinicians decide on individual additional booster vaccinations and/or passive immunization or antiviral treatment in patients with HBC getting infected with SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601882/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71412861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management. 肝细胞胆管癌合并症:生物学、诊断和管理》(Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management)。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-24 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530700
Liangtao Ye, Julia S Schneider, Najib Ben Khaled, Peter Schirmacher, Carolin Seifert, Lea Frey, Yulong He, Andreas Geier, Enrico N De Toni, Changhua Zhang, Florian P Reiter

Background: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-iCCA) is a rare type of primary liver cancer displaying characteristics of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation.

Summary: Because of its aggressive nature, patients with cHCC-iCCA exhibit a poorer prognosis than those with HCC. Surgical resection and liver transplantation may be considered curative treatment approaches; however, only a minority of patients are eligible at the time of diagnosis, and postoperative recurrence rates are high. For cases that are not eligible for surgery, locoregional and systemic therapy are often administered based on treatment protocols applied for HCC or iCCA. Owing to the rarity of this cancer, there are still no established standard treatment protocols; therefore, the choice of therapy is often personalized and guided by the suspected predominant component. Further, the genomic and molecular heterogeneity of cHCC-iCCA can severely compromise the efficacy of the available therapies.

Key messages: In the present review, we summarize the latest advances in cHCC-iCCA and attempt to clarify its terminology and molecular biology. We provide an overview of the etiology of cHCC-iCCA and present new insights into the molecular pathology of this disease that could contribute to further studies aiming to improve the patient outcomes through new systemic therapies.

背景:摘要:由于具有侵袭性,cHCC-iCCA 患者的预后比 HCC 患者差。手术切除和肝移植可视为根治性治疗方法,但只有少数患者在确诊时符合条件,而且术后复发率很高。对于不符合手术条件的病例,通常会根据 HCC 或 iCCA 的治疗方案进行局部和全身治疗。由于这种癌症的罕见性,目前还没有既定的标准治疗方案;因此,治疗方法的选择往往是个性化的,并以怀疑的主要成分为指导。此外,cHCC-iCCA 的基因组和分子异质性会严重影响现有疗法的疗效:在本综述中,我们总结了 cHCC-iCCA 的最新进展,并试图澄清其术语和分子生物学。我们概述了 cHCC-iCCA 的病因,并提出了对该疾病分子病理学的新见解,这些见解有助于开展进一步研究,从而通过新的系统疗法改善患者的预后。
{"title":"Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Biology, Diagnosis, and Management.","authors":"Liangtao Ye, Julia S Schneider, Najib Ben Khaled, Peter Schirmacher, Carolin Seifert, Lea Frey, Yulong He, Andreas Geier, Enrico N De Toni, Changhua Zhang, Florian P Reiter","doi":"10.1159/000530700","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530700","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-iCCA) is a rare type of primary liver cancer displaying characteristics of both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Because of its aggressive nature, patients with cHCC-iCCA exhibit a poorer prognosis than those with HCC. Surgical resection and liver transplantation may be considered curative treatment approaches; however, only a minority of patients are eligible at the time of diagnosis, and postoperative recurrence rates are high. For cases that are not eligible for surgery, locoregional and systemic therapy are often administered based on treatment protocols applied for HCC or iCCA. Owing to the rarity of this cancer, there are still no established standard treatment protocols; therefore, the choice of therapy is often personalized and guided by the suspected predominant component. Further, the genomic and molecular heterogeneity of cHCC-iCCA can severely compromise the efficacy of the available therapies.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>In the present review, we summarize the latest advances in cHCC-iCCA and attempt to clarify its terminology and molecular biology. We provide an overview of the etiology of cHCC-iCCA and present new insights into the molecular pathology of this disease that could contribute to further studies aiming to improve the patient outcomes through new systemic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857821/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83516306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
HBV DNA Integration into Telomerase or MLL4 Genes and TERT Promoter Point Mutation as Three Independent Signatures in Subgrouping HBV-Related HCC with Distinct Features. HBV DNA整合到端粒酶或MLL4基因以及TERT启动子点突变是对具有不同特征的HBV相关HCC进行分组的三个独立标志。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-17 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530699
Chiao-Ling Li, Chia-Lang Hsu, You-Yu Lin, Ming-Chih Ho, Ray-Heng Hu, Chi-Ling Chen, Tung-Ching Ho, Yung-Feng Lin, Shih-Feng Tsai, Sheng-Tai Tzeng, Chin-Fang Huang, Ya-Chun Wang, Shiou-Hwei Yeh, Pei-Jer Chen

Introduction: A set of genetic mutations to classify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) useful to clinical studies is an unmet need. Hepatitis B virus-related HCC (HBV-HCC) harbors a unique genetic mutation, namely, the HBV integration, among other somatic endogenous gene mutations. We explored a combination of HBV DNA integrations and common somatic mutations to classify HBV-HCC by using a capture-sequencing platform.

Methods: A total of 153 HBV-HCCs after surgical resection were subjected to capture sequencing to identify HBV integrations and three common somatic mutations in genomes. Three mutually exclusive mutations, HBV DNA integration into the TERT promoter, HBV DNA integration into MLL4, or TERT promoter point mutation, were identified in HBV-HCC.

Results: They were used to classify HBV-HCCs into four groups: G1 with HBV-TERT integration (25.5%); G2 with HBV-MLL4 integration (10.5%); G3 with TERT promoter mutation (30.1%); and G4 without these three mutations (34.0%). Clinically, G3 has the highest male-to-female ratio, cirrhosis rate, and associated with higher early recurrence and mortality after resection, but G4 has the best outcome. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a grouping different from the published ones and G2 with an active immune profile related to immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Analysis of integrated HBV DNA provided clues for HBV genotype and variants in carcinogenesis of different HCC subgroup. This new classification was also validated in another independent cohort.

Conclusion: A simple and robust genetic classification was developed to aid in understanding HBV-HCC and in harmonizing clinical studies.

简介:对肝细胞癌(HCC)进行分类的一系列基因突变是一项尚未满足的临床研究需求。与乙型肝炎病毒相关的 HCC(HBV-HCC)存在一种独特的基因突变,即 HBV 整合和其他体细胞内源性基因突变。我们利用捕获测序平台,结合 HBV DNA 整合和常见的体细胞突变对 HBV-HCC 进行了分类:方法:共对 153 例手术切除后的 HBV-HCC 进行了捕获测序,以确定基因组中的 HBV 整合和三种常见的体细胞突变。在HBV-HCC中发现了三种相互排斥的突变,即HBV DNA整合到TERT启动子、HBV DNA整合到MLL4或TERT启动子点突变:结果:这些基因突变被用来将 HBV-HCC 分成四组:G1组有HBV-TERT整合(25.5%);G2组有HBV-MLL4整合(10.5%);G3组有TERT启动子突变(30.1%);G4组没有这三种突变(34.0%)。在临床上,G3 的男女比例和肝硬化率最高,切除后的早期复发率和死亡率也较高,但 G4 的预后最好。转录组学分析表明,G2组与已发表的组别不同,其免疫特征活跃,与免疫检查点抑制剂反应有关。HBV DNA整合分析为不同HCC亚组的癌变提供了HBV基因型和变异的线索。这种新的分类方法也在另一个独立队列中得到了验证:结论:一种简单而可靠的基因分类方法有助于理解 HBV-HCC 并协调临床研究。
{"title":"HBV DNA Integration into Telomerase or MLL4 Genes and TERT Promoter Point Mutation as Three Independent Signatures in Subgrouping HBV-Related HCC with Distinct Features.","authors":"Chiao-Ling Li, Chia-Lang Hsu, You-Yu Lin, Ming-Chih Ho, Ray-Heng Hu, Chi-Ling Chen, Tung-Ching Ho, Yung-Feng Lin, Shih-Feng Tsai, Sheng-Tai Tzeng, Chin-Fang Huang, Ya-Chun Wang, Shiou-Hwei Yeh, Pei-Jer Chen","doi":"10.1159/000530699","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A set of genetic mutations to classify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) useful to clinical studies is an unmet need. Hepatitis B virus-related HCC (HBV-HCC) harbors a unique genetic mutation, namely, the HBV integration, among other somatic endogenous gene mutations. We explored a combination of HBV DNA integrations and common somatic mutations to classify HBV-HCC by using a capture-sequencing platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 153 HBV-HCCs after surgical resection were subjected to capture sequencing to identify HBV integrations and three common somatic mutations in genomes. Three mutually exclusive mutations, HBV DNA integration into the TERT promoter, HBV DNA integration into MLL4, or TERT promoter point mutation, were identified in HBV-HCC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>They were used to classify HBV-HCCs into four groups: G1 with HBV-TERT integration (25.5%); G2 with HBV-MLL4 integration (10.5%); G3 with TERT promoter mutation (30.1%); and G4 without these three mutations (34.0%). Clinically, G3 has the highest male-to-female ratio, cirrhosis rate, and associated with higher early recurrence and mortality after resection, but G4 has the best outcome. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a grouping different from the published ones and G2 with an active immune profile related to immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Analysis of integrated HBV DNA provided clues for HBV genotype and variants in carcinogenesis of different HCC subgroup. This new classification was also validated in another independent cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A simple and robust genetic classification was developed to aid in understanding HBV-HCC and in harmonizing clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73200216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging to Identify Cholangiocarcinoma in the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree Using an Enzyme-Activatable Probe. 利用酶激活探针实时荧光成像识别肝外胆道树胆管癌。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-14 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530645
Ryugen Takahashi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Yoshinori Inagaki, Mariko Tanaka, Akira Ogasawara, Yugo Kuriki, Kyohhei Fujita, Mako Kamiya, Tetsuo Ushiku, Yasuteru Urano, Kiyoshi Hasegawa

Introduction: Complete resection is the only possible treatment for cholangiocarcinoma in the extrahepatic biliary tree (eCCA), although current imaging modalities are limited in their ability to accurately diagnose longitudinal spread. We aimed to develop fluorescence imaging techniques for real-time identification of eCCA using an enzyme-activatable probe, which emits fluorescence immediately after activation by a cancer-specific enzyme.

Methods: Using lysates and small tissue fragments collected from surgically resected specimens, we selected the most specific probe for eCCA from among 800 enzyme-activatable probes. The selected probe was directly sprayed onto resected specimens and fluorescence images were acquired; these images were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy. We also comprehensively searched for enzymes that could activate the probe, then compared their expression levels in cancer and non-cancer tissues.

Results: Analyses of 19 samples (four cancer lysates, seven non-cancer lysates, and eight bile samples) and 54 tissue fragments (13 cancer tissues and 41 non-cancer tissues) revealed that PM-2MeSiR was the most specific fluorophore for eCCA. Fluorescence images of 7 patients were obtained; these images enabled rapid identification of cancerous regions, which closely matched histopathology findings in 4 patients. Puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase was identified as the enzyme that might activate the probe, and its expression was upregulated in eCCA.

Conclusion: Fluorescence imaging with PM-2MeSiR, which may be activated by puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase, yielded generally high accuracy. This technique may be useful for real-time identification of the spread of eCCA during surgery and endoscopic examinations.

虽然目前的成像方式在准确诊断纵向扩散方面受到限制,但完全切除是肝外胆道树(eCCA)胆管癌唯一可能的治疗方法。我们的目标是开发荧光成像技术,使用酶激活探针实时识别eCCA,该探针在被癌症特异性酶激活后立即发出荧光。方法:利用从手术切除标本中收集的裂解物和小组织碎片,我们从800个酶激活探针中选择了最特异性的eCCA探针。选择的探针直接喷射到切除的标本上,获得荧光图像;评估这些图像的诊断准确性。我们还全面搜索了可以激活探针的酶,然后比较了它们在癌组织和非癌组织中的表达水平。结果:对19份样本(4份癌溶物、7份非癌溶物和8份胆汁样本)和54份组织片段(13份癌组织和41份非癌组织)的分析显示,PM-2MeSiR是eCCA特异性最强的荧光团。获得7例患者的荧光图像;这些图像能够快速识别癌变区域,与4例患者的组织病理学结果密切匹配。经鉴定,嘌呤霉素敏感氨基肽酶可能激活探针,其在eCCA中的表达上调。结论:PM-2MeSiR可被嘌呤霉素敏感氨基肽酶激活,荧光成像准确度普遍较高。这项技术可能有助于在手术和内镜检查中实时识别eCCA的扩散。
{"title":"Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging to Identify Cholangiocarcinoma in the Extrahepatic Biliary Tree Using an Enzyme-Activatable Probe.","authors":"Ryugen Takahashi, Takeaki Ishizawa, Yoshinori Inagaki, Mariko Tanaka, Akira Ogasawara, Yugo Kuriki, Kyohhei Fujita, Mako Kamiya, Tetsuo Ushiku, Yasuteru Urano, Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1159/000530645","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Complete resection is the only possible treatment for cholangiocarcinoma in the extrahepatic biliary tree (eCCA), although current imaging modalities are limited in their ability to accurately diagnose longitudinal spread. We aimed to develop fluorescence imaging techniques for real-time identification of eCCA using an enzyme-activatable probe, which emits fluorescence immediately after activation by a cancer-specific enzyme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using lysates and small tissue fragments collected from surgically resected specimens, we selected the most specific probe for eCCA from among 800 enzyme-activatable probes. The selected probe was directly sprayed onto resected specimens and fluorescence images were acquired; these images were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy. We also comprehensively searched for enzymes that could activate the probe, then compared their expression levels in cancer and non-cancer tissues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses of 19 samples (four cancer lysates, seven non-cancer lysates, and eight bile samples) and 54 tissue fragments (13 cancer tissues and 41 non-cancer tissues) revealed that PM-2MeSiR was the most specific fluorophore for eCCA. Fluorescence images of 7 patients were obtained; these images enabled rapid identification of cancerous regions, which closely matched histopathology findings in 4 patients. Puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase was identified as the enzyme that might activate the probe, and its expression was upregulated in eCCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluorescence imaging with PM-2MeSiR, which may be activated by puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase, yielded generally high accuracy. This technique may be useful for real-time identification of the spread of eCCA during surgery and endoscopic examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697719/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81197856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition). 原发性癌症诊断和治疗指南(2022年版)。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-05 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530495
Jian Zhou, Huichuan Sun, Zheng Wang, Wenming Cong, Mengsu Zeng, Weiping Zhou, Ping Bie, Lianxin Liu, Tianfu Wen, Ming Kuang, Guohong Han, Zhiping Yan, Maoqiang Wang, Ruibao Liu, Ligong Lu, Zhenggang Ren, Zhaochong Zeng, Ping Liang, Changhong Liang, Min Chen, Fuhua Yan, Wenping Wang, Jinlin Hou, Yuan Ji, Jingping Yun, Xueli Bai, Dingfang Cai, Weixia Chen, Yongjun Chen, Wenwu Cheng, Shuqun Cheng, Chaoliu Dai, Wengzhi Guo, Yabing Guo, Baojin Hua, Xiaowu Huang, Weidong Jia, Qiu Li, Tao Li, Xun Li, Yaming Li, Yexiong Li, Jun Liang, Changquan Ling, Tianshu Liu, Xiufeng Liu, Shichun Lu, Guoyue Lv, Yilei Mao, Zhiqiang Meng, Tao Peng, Weixin Ren, Hongcheng Shi, Guoming Shi, Ming Shi, Tianqiang Song, Kaishan Tao, Jianhua Wang, Kui Wang, Lu Wang, Wentao Wang, Xiaoying Wang, Zhiming Wang, Bangde Xiang, Baocai Xing, Jianming Xu, Jiamei Yang, Jianyong Yang, Yefa Yang, Yunke Yang, Shenglong Ye, Zhenyu Yin, Yong Zeng, Bixiang Zhang, Boheng Zhang, Leida Zhang, Shuijun Zhang, Ti Zhang, Yanqiao Zhang, Ming Zhao, Yongfu Zhao, Honggang Zheng, Ledu Zhou, Jiye Zhu, Kangshun Zhu, Rong Liu, Yinghong Shi, Yongsheng Xiao, Lan Zhang, Chun Yang, Zhifeng Wu, Zhi Dai, Minshan Chen, Jianqiang Cai, Weilin Wang, Xiujun Cai, Qiang Li, Feng Shen, Shukui Qin, Gaojun Teng, Jiahong Dong, Jia Fan

Background: Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people.

Summary: Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer.

Key messages: The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the "Health China 2030 Blueprint."

背景:原发性癌症是我国第四大恶性肿瘤,也是肿瘤死亡的第二大原因,约占我国原发性肝癌的75-85%,对我国人民的生命健康构成重大威胁。摘要:自2017年6月国家卫生健康委员会于2019年12月更新的《中国原发性癌症诊断和治疗指南》发布以来,世界各地的研究人员在癌症的诊断、分期和治疗方面出现了更多高质量的证据,需要再次更新指南。新版(2022年版)由中国癌症领域的100多位专家撰写,不仅反映了中国的现实情况,也可能重塑癌症的全国诊疗。关键信息:新指南旨在鼓励实施循证实践,提高癌症患者的全国平均5年生存率,正如《健康中国2030蓝图》所提出的那样
{"title":"Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition).","authors":"Jian Zhou,&nbsp;Huichuan Sun,&nbsp;Zheng Wang,&nbsp;Wenming Cong,&nbsp;Mengsu Zeng,&nbsp;Weiping Zhou,&nbsp;Ping Bie,&nbsp;Lianxin Liu,&nbsp;Tianfu Wen,&nbsp;Ming Kuang,&nbsp;Guohong Han,&nbsp;Zhiping Yan,&nbsp;Maoqiang Wang,&nbsp;Ruibao Liu,&nbsp;Ligong Lu,&nbsp;Zhenggang Ren,&nbsp;Zhaochong Zeng,&nbsp;Ping Liang,&nbsp;Changhong Liang,&nbsp;Min Chen,&nbsp;Fuhua Yan,&nbsp;Wenping Wang,&nbsp;Jinlin Hou,&nbsp;Yuan Ji,&nbsp;Jingping Yun,&nbsp;Xueli Bai,&nbsp;Dingfang Cai,&nbsp;Weixia Chen,&nbsp;Yongjun Chen,&nbsp;Wenwu Cheng,&nbsp;Shuqun Cheng,&nbsp;Chaoliu Dai,&nbsp;Wengzhi Guo,&nbsp;Yabing Guo,&nbsp;Baojin Hua,&nbsp;Xiaowu Huang,&nbsp;Weidong Jia,&nbsp;Qiu Li,&nbsp;Tao Li,&nbsp;Xun Li,&nbsp;Yaming Li,&nbsp;Yexiong Li,&nbsp;Jun Liang,&nbsp;Changquan Ling,&nbsp;Tianshu Liu,&nbsp;Xiufeng Liu,&nbsp;Shichun Lu,&nbsp;Guoyue Lv,&nbsp;Yilei Mao,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Meng,&nbsp;Tao Peng,&nbsp;Weixin Ren,&nbsp;Hongcheng Shi,&nbsp;Guoming Shi,&nbsp;Ming Shi,&nbsp;Tianqiang Song,&nbsp;Kaishan Tao,&nbsp;Jianhua Wang,&nbsp;Kui Wang,&nbsp;Lu Wang,&nbsp;Wentao Wang,&nbsp;Xiaoying Wang,&nbsp;Zhiming Wang,&nbsp;Bangde Xiang,&nbsp;Baocai Xing,&nbsp;Jianming Xu,&nbsp;Jiamei Yang,&nbsp;Jianyong Yang,&nbsp;Yefa Yang,&nbsp;Yunke Yang,&nbsp;Shenglong Ye,&nbsp;Zhenyu Yin,&nbsp;Yong Zeng,&nbsp;Bixiang Zhang,&nbsp;Boheng Zhang,&nbsp;Leida Zhang,&nbsp;Shuijun Zhang,&nbsp;Ti Zhang,&nbsp;Yanqiao Zhang,&nbsp;Ming Zhao,&nbsp;Yongfu Zhao,&nbsp;Honggang Zheng,&nbsp;Ledu Zhou,&nbsp;Jiye Zhu,&nbsp;Kangshun Zhu,&nbsp;Rong Liu,&nbsp;Yinghong Shi,&nbsp;Yongsheng Xiao,&nbsp;Lan Zhang,&nbsp;Chun Yang,&nbsp;Zhifeng Wu,&nbsp;Zhi Dai,&nbsp;Minshan Chen,&nbsp;Jianqiang Cai,&nbsp;Weilin Wang,&nbsp;Xiujun Cai,&nbsp;Qiang Li,&nbsp;Feng Shen,&nbsp;Shukui Qin,&nbsp;Gaojun Teng,&nbsp;Jiahong Dong,&nbsp;Jia Fan","doi":"10.1159/000530495","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530495","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the \"Health China 2030 Blueprint.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601883/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71412867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Treatment-Naive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Has Different Treatment Effects Depending on Central or Peripheral Tumor Location. 经导管动脉化疗栓塞治疗原发性肝癌的治疗效果取决于肿瘤的中心或周围位置。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-31 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530441
Kazuo Asano, Ken Kageyama, Akira Yamamoto, Atsushi Jogo, Sawako Uchida-Kobayashi, Etsuji Sohgawa, Kazuki Murai, Norifumi Kawada, Yukio Miki

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treatment-naive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to tumor location and burden.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent TACE as the first treatment were enrolled. Tumors were classified into two categories based on their location, as central or peripheral tumors. Tumors in the central zone, which is within 1 cm of the main trunk or the first branch of the portal vein, were classified as central tumors, while those located in the peripheral zone were classified as peripheral tumors. Patients were grouped according to the HCC location and up-to-7 criteria. Patients with central tumors were classified into the central arm and those with only peripheral tumors were classified into the peripheral arm. Patients within and beyond the up-to-7 criteria were classified into the up-to-7 in and up-to-7 out-groups, respectively. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared per nodule (central tumor vs. peripheral tumor) and per patient (central arm vs. peripheral arm), respectively. The prognostic factors of LRFS and PFS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: A total of 174 treatment-naive patients with 352 HCCs were retrospectively enrolled. Ninety-six patients and 130 lesions were selected by propensity score matching. Median LRFS was longer for peripheral tumors than central tumors (not reached vs. 3.3 months, p < 0.001). Median PFS was 17.1 months (8.3-24.9) in the peripheral arm and up-to-7 in, 7.0 months (3.3-12.7) in the peripheral arm and up-to-7 out, 8.4 months (4.0-12.6) in the central arm and up-to-7 in, and 3.0 months (1.2-4.9) in the central arm and up-to-7 out-groups. The peripheral arm and up-to-7 in-groups had significantly longer PFS than the other three groups (p = 0.013, p = 0.015, p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the central zone and central arm were associated with high adjusted hazard ratios for tumor recurrence or death (2.87, p < 0.001; 2.89, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Treatment-naive HCCs in the peripheral zone had a longer LRFS and PFS following TACE compared to those in the central zone.

摘要:本研究的目的是根据肿瘤部位和负荷,评价经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗初治肝癌(HCC)的疗效。方法:在2010年至2019年期间,连续接受TACE作为首次治疗的患者入组。肿瘤根据其位置分为中枢性和外周性两类。位于门静脉主干或第一分支1cm以内的中心区肿瘤为中心区肿瘤,位于外周区肿瘤为外周区肿瘤。根据HCC的位置和7级标准对患者进行分组。有中枢肿瘤的患者分为中央臂,只有外周肿瘤的患者分为外周臂。达到和超过7级标准的患者分别分为7级以内组和7级以内组。局部无复发生存期(LRFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别比较每个结节(中央肿瘤与外周肿瘤)和每个患者(中央臂与外周臂)。通过单因素和多因素分析分析LRFS和PFS的预后因素。结果:共纳入174例未接受治疗的352例hcc患者。采用倾向评分匹配法选择96例患者和130个病灶。外周肿瘤的中位LRFS长于中枢肿瘤(未达到vs. 3.3个月,p < 0.001)。中位PFS外周组为17.1个月(8.3-24.9),至7 in;外周组为7.0个月(3.3-12.7),至7 in;中心组为8.4个月(4.0-12.6),至7 in;中心组为3.0个月(1.2-4.9),至7 in。外周臂组和7岁以内组的PFS明显长于其他三组(p = 0.013, p = 0.015, p < 0.001)。多因素分析证实,中心区和中心臂与肿瘤复发或死亡的高校正危险比相关(2.87,p < 0.001;2.89, p < 0.001)。结论:与中心区相比,外周区未接受治疗的hcc在TACE后的LRFS和PFS更长。
{"title":"Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Treatment-Naive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Has Different Treatment Effects Depending on Central or Peripheral Tumor Location.","authors":"Kazuo Asano, Ken Kageyama, Akira Yamamoto, Atsushi Jogo, Sawako Uchida-Kobayashi, Etsuji Sohgawa, Kazuki Murai, Norifumi Kawada, Yukio Miki","doi":"10.1159/000530441","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000530441","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treatment-naive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to tumor location and burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2010 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent TACE as the first treatment were enrolled. Tumors were classified into two categories based on their location, as central or peripheral tumors. Tumors in the central zone, which is within 1 cm of the main trunk or the first branch of the portal vein, were classified as central tumors, while those located in the peripheral zone were classified as peripheral tumors. Patients were grouped according to the HCC location and up-to-7 criteria. Patients with central tumors were classified into the central arm and those with only peripheral tumors were classified into the peripheral arm. Patients within and beyond the up-to-7 criteria were classified into the up-to-7 in and up-to-7 out-groups, respectively. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared per nodule (central tumor vs. peripheral tumor) and per patient (central arm vs. peripheral arm), respectively. The prognostic factors of LRFS and PFS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 174 treatment-naive patients with 352 HCCs were retrospectively enrolled. Ninety-six patients and 130 lesions were selected by propensity score matching. Median LRFS was longer for peripheral tumors than central tumors (not reached vs. 3.3 months, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Median PFS was 17.1 months (8.3-24.9) in the peripheral arm and up-to-7 in, 7.0 months (3.3-12.7) in the peripheral arm and up-to-7 out, 8.4 months (4.0-12.6) in the central arm and up-to-7 in, and 3.0 months (1.2-4.9) in the central arm and up-to-7 out-groups. The peripheral arm and up-to-7 in-groups had significantly longer PFS than the other three groups (<i>p</i> = 0.013, <i>p</i> = 0.015, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the central zone and central arm were associated with high adjusted hazard ratios for tumor recurrence or death (2.87, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 2.89, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment-naive HCCs in the peripheral zone had a longer LRFS and PFS following TACE compared to those in the central zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82787617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival Trends in Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. 索拉非尼治疗晚期肝癌的生存趋势:随机试验的重建个体患者数据荟萃分析。
IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-03-28 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1159/000529824
Darren Jun Hao Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Wen Hui Lim, Cheng Han Ng, Benjamin Nah, Clarissa Fu, Jieling Xiao, Benjamin Koh, Phoebe Wen Lin Tay, Eunice X Tan, Margaret Teng, Nicholas Syn, Mark D Muthiah, Nobuharu Tamaki, Sung Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Thomas Yau, Arndt Vogel, Rohit Loomba, Daniel Q Huang

Background: Emerging data suggest that outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib may have improved over time. We aimed to provide robust, time-to-event estimates of survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC.

Summary: In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception till September 2022 for RCTs that provided data for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for sorafenib monotherapy as first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC. We performed a pooled analysis using reconstructed individual participant data from published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain robust estimates for OS and PFS. Of 1,599 articles identified, 29 studies (5,525 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the median OS was 10.4 (95% CI: 9.6-11.4) months. Median OS increased over time, from 9.8 (95% CI: 8.8-10.7) months in studies before 2015 to 13.4 (95% CI: 11.03-15.24) months in studies from 2015 onwards (p < 0.001). OS did not differ by trial phase, geographical region, or study design. The overall median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI: 3.9-4.8) months, but PFS did not improve over time. Sensitivity analysis of studies from 2015 and onwards to account for the introduction of direct-acting antivirals determined that hepatitis C virus was associated with reduced mortality (p < 0.001). There was minimal heterogeneity in the estimates for OS (all I2 ≤ 33).

Key messages: Survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC have improved over time. These data have important implications for clinical trial design.

背景:新出现的数据表明,索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效可能会随着时间的推移而改善。我们旨在为索拉非尼治疗晚期HCC的生存结果提供可靠的、及时的估计。总结:在这项随机对照试验(RCT)的系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析中,我们从开始到2022年9月搜索了MEDLINE和Embase的随机对照试验,这些试验提供了索拉非尼单药治疗作为晚期HCC一线系统治疗的总生存率(OS)和无进展生存率(PFS)数据。我们使用从已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线重建的个体参与者数据进行了汇总分析,以获得OS和PFS的稳健估计。在确定的1599篇文章中,29项研究(5525名患者)符合纳入标准。总体而言,中位OS为10.4个月(95%CI:9.6-11.4)。中位OS随着时间的推移而增加,从2015年之前研究的9.8个月(95%CI:8.8-10.7)增加到2015年以后研究的13.4个月(95%CI:11.03-15.24)(p<0.001)。OS在试验阶段、地理区域或研究设计方面没有差异。总体中位PFS为4.4个月(95%CI:3.9-4.8),但PFS并没有随着时间的推移而改善。考虑到直接作用抗病毒药物的引入,对2015年及以后的研究进行了敏感性分析,确定丙型肝炎病毒与死亡率降低有关(p<0.001)。OS的估计值具有最小的异质性(所有I2≤33)。关键信息:索拉非尼治疗晚期HCC的生存结果随着时间的推移而改善。这些数据对临床试验设计具有重要意义。
{"title":"Survival Trends in Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.","authors":"Darren Jun Hao Tan, Ansel Shao Pin Tang, Wen Hui Lim, Cheng Han Ng, Benjamin Nah, Clarissa Fu, Jieling Xiao, Benjamin Koh, Phoebe Wen Lin Tay, Eunice X Tan, Margaret Teng, Nicholas Syn, Mark D Muthiah, Nobuharu Tamaki, Sung Won Lee, Beom Kyung Kim, Thomas Yau, Arndt Vogel, Rohit Loomba, Daniel Q Huang","doi":"10.1159/000529824","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000529824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging data suggest that outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib may have improved over time. We aimed to provide robust, time-to-event estimates of survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception till September 2022 for RCTs that provided data for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for sorafenib monotherapy as first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC. We performed a pooled analysis using reconstructed individual participant data from published Kaplan-Meier curves to obtain robust estimates for OS and PFS. Of 1,599 articles identified, 29 studies (5,525 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the median OS was 10.4 (95% CI: 9.6-11.4) months. Median OS increased over time, from 9.8 (95% CI: 8.8-10.7) months in studies before 2015 to 13.4 (95% CI: 11.03-15.24) months in studies from 2015 onwards (<i>p</i> < 0.001). OS did not differ by trial phase, geographical region, or study design. The overall median PFS was 4.4 (95% CI: 3.9-4.8) months, but PFS did not improve over time. Sensitivity analysis of studies from 2015 and onwards to account for the introduction of direct-acting antivirals determined that hepatitis C virus was associated with reduced mortality (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There was minimal heterogeneity in the estimates for OS (all <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> ≤ 33).</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Survival outcomes for sorafenib in advanced HCC have improved over time. These data have important implications for clinical trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.6,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601853/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71412870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 小肝癌的外科切除或射频消融。
IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-23 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1159/000530300
Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Ryosuke Tateishi, Norihiro Kokudo, Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Not applicable
{"title":"Surgical Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Yoshikuni Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Ryosuke Tateishi,&nbsp;Norihiro Kokudo,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1159/000530300","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530300","url":null,"abstract":"Not applicable","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601841/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71412869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Liver Cancer
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1