This article presents an analysis of the rulings issued by the Supreme Court of Justice - Labor Chamber and Labor Congestion Chamber - regarding the operationality of survivor pensions in same-sex couples. To achieve this, a qualitative methodology of jurisprudential review is employed to analyze the rules and sub-rules applied by the judges in resolving these cases, contrasting them with certain foundational ideas of queer legal theories. In this analytical exercise, the text elucidates how, within the dogmatic rules devised by the ordinary labor judge, there are emancipatory opportunities that escape the binary gender paradigm. One of the main conclusions drawn from this analysis is the progressive role played by the Labor Cassation Chamber and the Congestion Chamber within labor law, in formulating norms that acknowledge differentiated cohabitation for the acquisition of survivor pensions for same-sex couples.
{"title":"Coming Out of the Pension Closet: An Analysis From the Queer Theory of the Rulings of the Supreme Court of Justice in Relation to the Operation of the Survivor’s Pension in Same-sex Couples in Colombia","authors":"Juan Felipe Parra Rosas","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.6669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6669","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an analysis of the rulings issued by the Supreme Court of Justice - Labor Chamber and Labor Congestion Chamber - regarding the operationality of survivor pensions in same-sex couples. To achieve this, a qualitative methodology of jurisprudential review is employed to analyze the rules and sub-rules applied by the judges in resolving these cases, contrasting them with certain foundational ideas of queer legal theories. In this analytical exercise, the text elucidates how, within the dogmatic rules devised by the ordinary labor judge, there are emancipatory opportunities that escape the binary gender paradigm. One of the main conclusions drawn from this analysis is the progressive role played by the Labor Cassation Chamber and the Congestion Chamber within labor law, in formulating norms that acknowledge differentiated cohabitation for the acquisition of survivor pensions for same-sex couples.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140720554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Robert Schuett, a former career civil servant (2011-2022), is currently a non-resident professor in international relations at the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, a visiting fellow at the Department of Political Science at the University of Salzburg, as well as an honorary member of the School of Governance and International Affairs at the University of Durham, England. Robert Schuett was awarded a master’s degree by research in 2005 and a PhD in 2009, both in Political Science from the School of Governance and International Affairs at Durham University; the supervisor of his doctoral thesis was John C. Williams (Durham University), and his external evaluators were Chris J. Brown (London School of Economics) and Richard Little (University of Bristol). In 2007, he completed a doctoral research stay at LUISS University in Rome and, in 2010, he was a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, San Diego, USA. He currently lives and works in Vienna. Robert Schuett’s main areas of interest are political philosophy, international relations, and political methodology. He is particularly interested in the classical approach to political and legal theory, economics and society, ethics, and justice. Professor Robert Schuett has authored and edited numerous works, including Hans Kelsen’s Political Realism (2021), The Edinburgh Companion to Political Realism (2018), The Concept of the State in International Relations: Philosophy, Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism (2015), and Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations: The Resurrection of the Realism Man (2010).
罗伯特-舒伊特曾是一名职业公务员（2011-2022 年），现任维也纳外交学院国际关系非驻地教授、萨尔茨堡大学政治学系客座研究员以及英国杜伦大学治理与国际事务学院荣誉成员。Robert Schuett 于 2005 年和 2009 年分别获得杜伦大学治理与国际事务学院政治学研究硕士学位和博士学位；他的博士论文导师是 John C. Williams（杜伦大学），外部评估人是 Chris J. Brown（伦敦经济学院）和 Richard Little（布里斯托尔大学）。2007 年，他在罗马 LUISS 大学完成了博士研究，2010 年，他成为美国加州大学圣地亚哥分校心理学系的博士后研究员。罗伯特-舒伊特的主要研究领域是政治哲学、国际关系和政治方法论。他尤其对政治和法律理论、经济和社会、伦理和正义的古典方法感兴趣。罗伯特-舒伊特教授撰写和编辑了多部著作，包括《汉斯-凯尔森的政治现实主义》（2021 年）、《爱丁堡政治现实主义指南》（2018 年）、《国际关系中的国家概念》（The Concept of the State in International Relations：哲学、主权、世界主义》（2015 年），以及《国际关系中的政治现实主义、弗洛伊德与人性》：现实主义人的复活》（2010 年）。
{"title":"Un especialista en realismo político clásico y en la obra de Hans Kelsen: entrevista a Robert Schuett","authors":"Augusto Fernando Carrillo Salgado","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.5891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.5891","url":null,"abstract":"Robert Schuett, a former career civil servant (2011-2022), is currently a non-resident professor in international relations at the Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, a visiting fellow at the Department of Political Science at the University of Salzburg, as well as an honorary member of the School of Governance and International Affairs at the University of Durham, England. Robert Schuett was awarded a master’s degree by research in 2005 and a PhD in 2009, both in Political Science from the School of Governance and International Affairs at Durham University; the supervisor of his doctoral thesis was John C. Williams (Durham University), and his external evaluators were Chris J. Brown (London School of Economics) and Richard Little (University of Bristol). In 2007, he completed a doctoral research stay at LUISS University in Rome and, in 2010, he was a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Psychology at the University of California, San Diego, USA. He currently lives and works in Vienna.\u0000Robert Schuett’s main areas of interest are political philosophy, international relations, and political methodology. He is particularly interested in the classical approach to political and legal theory, economics and society, ethics, and justice. Professor Robert Schuett has authored and edited numerous works, including Hans Kelsen’s Political Realism (2021), The Edinburgh Companion to Political Realism (2018), The Concept of the State in International Relations: Philosophy, Sovereignty, Cosmopolitanism (2015), and Political Realism, Freud, and Human Nature in International Relations: The Resurrection of the Realism Man (2010).","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140726834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
María Liliana Castillo-Castillo, Stephanie Oliveros Ortiz, Diana Fernández Mejía
Cali, Colombia has been a destination for migrants from Venezuela, either to serve as a transit point or a settlement for those seeking better opportunities. This complex situation, within the context of an intermediate city located in the Global South, has led to unprecedented institutional challenges related to the assurance of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR), and even more, requirements for social coexistence. This paper aims to elucidate tensions that have arisen in the social integration of the migrant population in Cali, Colombia, based on the analysis of their access to health and work rights. The primary reference for this exploration is drawn from oral accounts provided by Venezuelan migrant participants residing in the city.
{"title":"Tensions in Social Integration Based on Access to Health and Decent Work for the Migrant Population in Santiago de Cali","authors":"María Liliana Castillo-Castillo, Stephanie Oliveros Ortiz, Diana Fernández Mejía","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.6512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6512","url":null,"abstract":"Cali, Colombia has been a destination for migrants from Venezuela, either to serve as a transit point or a settlement for those seeking better opportunities. This complex situation, within the context of an intermediate city located in the Global South, has led to unprecedented institutional challenges related to the assurance of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ESCR), and even more, requirements for social coexistence. This paper aims to elucidate tensions that have arisen in the social integration of the migrant population in Cali, Colombia, based on the analysis of their access to health and work rights. The primary reference for this exploration is drawn from oral accounts provided by Venezuelan migrant participants residing in the city.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140230582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
José Ramón Narváez Hernández, Jesús Ángel Cadena Alcalá
The article aims to analyze in perspective how constitutional interpretation influences electoral justice and the protection of fundamental rights of a political-electoral nature. A methodology is proposed for the correct and efficient use of constitutional and conventional interpretation by jurisdictional operators, with special emphasis on the analysis of the obstacles or technical barriers they face when carrying out constitutional-conventional regularity examinations. The conclusion was obtained that in electoral judicial practice there are many problems when maximizing or optimizing rights, so constitutional interpretation must be based on a consistent and credible examination of judicial argumentation and hermeneutics to enhance political-electoral rights and democratic principles in the framework of the democratic rule of law.
{"title":"Metodología para la interpretación constitucional desde el modelo de la justicia electoral mexicana","authors":"José Ramón Narváez Hernández, Jesús Ángel Cadena Alcalá","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.6486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6486","url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to analyze in perspective how constitutional interpretation influences electoral justice and the protection of fundamental rights of a political-electoral nature. A methodology is proposed for the correct and efficient use of constitutional and conventional interpretation by jurisdictional operators, with special emphasis on the analysis of the obstacles or technical barriers they face when carrying out constitutional-conventional regularity examinations. The conclusion was obtained that in electoral judicial practice there are many problems when maximizing or optimizing rights, so constitutional interpretation must be based on a consistent and credible examination of judicial argumentation and hermeneutics to enhance political-electoral rights and democratic principles in the framework of the democratic rule of law.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140239817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the Judgment T-369 of 2021, the Constitutional Court of Colombia reviews a case of human displacement caused by the diversion of the Cauca River for the Pescadero Ituango Hydroelectric Project (Hidroituango). This constitutional decision highlights the various routes established by jurisprudence for managing environmental displacement. However, this research aims to demonstrate that the existing protocols for addressing environmental displacement are not sufficient, especially considering that the incorporation of this special category of human migration into the Colombian legal system is necessary. Giving prominence to these concepts would facilitate the creation of a comprehensive care pathway focused on every stage of the environmental catastrophe generated by human movement.
{"title":"Environmental Displacement in Colombia: Challenges and Progress of Judgment T-369 of 2021 from the Constitutional Court","authors":"Rosa Stephanie Ramírez Cerón","doi":"10.18046/prec.v24.6665","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v24.6665","url":null,"abstract":"In the Judgment T-369 of 2021, the Constitutional Court of Colombia reviews a case of human displacement caused by the diversion of the Cauca River for the Pescadero Ituango Hydroelectric Project (Hidroituango). This constitutional decision highlights the various routes established by jurisprudence for managing environmental displacement. However, this research aims to demonstrate that the existing protocols for addressing environmental displacement are not sufficient, especially considering that the incorporation of this special category of human migration into the Colombian legal system is necessary. Giving prominence to these concepts would facilitate the creation of a comprehensive care pathway focused on every stage of the environmental catastrophe generated by human movement.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140242297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
El objetivo de este estudio es conceptualizar cómo la creación de leyes y su aplicación trabajan juntos en beneficio de la sociedad. Hasta ahora, la ley ha servido únicamente como una herramienta para el control social y es extremadamente inflexible, lo que hace imposible mantener adecuadamente los principios básicos de la implementación y la aplicación de la justicia. La ley debe poder evolucionar para servir como una herramienta que fomente el desarrollo social y que resulte en la satisfacción y el establecimiento del orden legal. Como resultado, el desarrollo legal debe priorizar los deseos y necesidades de la población. Este es un estudio sociolegal en el que los fenómenos sociales se interpretan como la dirección del desarrollo legal. Empleando un enfoque conceptual y analizando datos cualitativos obtenidos de la revisión de la literatura, nuestros hallazgos revelaron que las necesidades de las personas, particularmente en Indonesia, han cambiado en respuesta al establecimiento de la ley. Con el deseo de aportar sus aspiraciones en la creación de la ley y servir como sociedad participativa en el monitoreo de la forma como se lleva a cabo la aplicación de la ley, el desarrollo del pensamiento legal dentro de la sociedad se está moviendo en una dirección positiva. El desarrollo jurídico debe cambiar el paradigma que anteriormente consideraba al derecho meramente como un mecanismo de control social, como resultado de los cambios sociales. Tanto la creación de leyes como la aplicación de estas deben abrazar una sociedad participativa. Por lo tanto, el objetivo es traducir este ideal legal en la práctica mediante el establecimiento de un desarrollo legal que beneficie a la sociedad.
{"title":"Legal Ideals: Lawmaking and Law Enforcement Primarily based on Community Social Life in Indonesia","authors":"Diya Ul Akmal, Fauzziyyah Azhar Ramadhan","doi":"10.18046/prec.v23.6008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v23.6008","url":null,"abstract":"El objetivo de este estudio es conceptualizar cómo la creación de leyes y su aplicación trabajan juntos en beneficio de la sociedad. Hasta ahora, la ley ha servido únicamente como una herramienta para el control social y es extremadamente inflexible, lo que hace imposible mantener adecuadamente los principios básicos de la implementación y la aplicación de la justicia. La ley debe poder evolucionar para servir como una herramienta que fomente el desarrollo social y que resulte en la satisfacción y el establecimiento del orden legal. Como resultado, el desarrollo legal debe priorizar los deseos y necesidades de la población. Este es un estudio sociolegal en el que los fenómenos sociales se interpretan como la dirección del desarrollo legal. Empleando un enfoque conceptual y analizando datos cualitativos obtenidos de la revisión de la literatura, nuestros hallazgos revelaron que las necesidades de las personas, particularmente en Indonesia, han cambiado en respuesta al establecimiento de la ley. Con el deseo de aportar sus aspiraciones en la creación de la ley y servir como sociedad participativa en el monitoreo de la forma como se lleva a cabo la aplicación de la ley, el desarrollo del pensamiento legal dentro de la sociedad se está moviendo en una dirección positiva. El desarrollo jurídico debe cambiar el paradigma que anteriormente consideraba al derecho meramente como un mecanismo de control social, como resultado de los cambios sociales. Tanto la creación de leyes como la aplicación de estas deben abrazar una sociedad participativa. Por lo tanto, el objetivo es traducir este ideal legal en la práctica mediante el establecimiento de un desarrollo legal que beneficie a la sociedad.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"118 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139241455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
El presente artículo establece que la Corte Constitucional colombiana fundamenta una interpretación y definición sustancial del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad a partir de una política pública de estirpe liberal, auspiciada por el paradigma del nuevo constitucionalismo. El marco contextual en el cual se desarrolla esta hipótesis es la República de Colombia, donde se profirió la Sentencia T-479 de 2015. Se concluye que existen mínimamente unos compromisos morales entre el Estado y sus ciudadanos, más allá del simple mantenimiento del orden público que predica la neutralidad liberal. Así, por ejemplo, el impacto de la política pública del consumo de cigarrillos en establecimientos penitenciarios configura compromisos que deberían ser atendidos por el Estado. Para arribar al objetivo de este trabajo, se utiliza un tipo de estudio jurídico descriptivo que permite delimitar el objeto de análisis, utilizando, a través de la deducción como método, una herramienta que permita llegar a concreciones sobre el caso particular de la Sentencia T-479 de 2015. El trabajo intenta responder el problema de investigación sobre si el paradigma neoconstitucionalista es una herramienta que permite la interpretación y definición sustancial del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad en el marco de la política pública del consumo de cigarrillos en establecimientos penitenciarios.
{"title":"Interpretación neoconstitucional del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad: una reflexión sobre la política pública del consumo de cigarrillo en los establecimientos penitenciarios y carcelarios de Colombia","authors":"Luis Alberto Sierra Pajoy, José Luis Osorio Muñoz","doi":"10.18046/prec.v23.6263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18046/prec.v23.6263","url":null,"abstract":"El presente artículo establece que la Corte Constitucional colombiana fundamenta una interpretación y definición sustancial del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad a partir de una política pública de estirpe liberal, auspiciada por el paradigma del nuevo constitucionalismo. El marco contextual en el cual se desarrolla esta hipótesis es la República de Colombia, donde se profirió la Sentencia T-479 de 2015. Se concluye que existen mínimamente unos compromisos morales entre el Estado y sus ciudadanos, más allá del simple mantenimiento del orden público que predica la neutralidad liberal. Así, por ejemplo, el impacto de la política pública del consumo de cigarrillos en establecimientos penitenciarios configura compromisos que deberían ser atendidos por el Estado. Para arribar al objetivo de este trabajo, se utiliza un tipo de estudio jurídico descriptivo que permite delimitar el objeto de análisis, utilizando, a través de la deducción como método, una herramienta que permita llegar a concreciones sobre el caso particular de la Sentencia T-479 de 2015. El trabajo intenta responder el problema de investigación sobre si el paradigma neoconstitucionalista es una herramienta que permite la interpretación y definición sustancial del derecho al libre desarrollo de la personalidad en el marco de la política pública del consumo de cigarrillos en establecimientos penitenciarios.","PeriodicalId":184312,"journal":{"name":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124251764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：