Microbial Physiology最新文献

It has long become clear that in spite of generally lacking internal membrane systems, bacteria contain well-structured subcellular structures of usually filamentous proteins, and a preferred 3D arrangement of their chromosome(s). Some of these systems are set up by so-called cytoskeletal elements, or by polar landmark proteins, but the mechanism of specific localization is still unclear in most cases. Intriguingly, apart from such spatially organizing systems, the bacterial cytoplasm has unusual properties in terms of the diffusion of molecules, which varies between different sites within the cell. In many bacteria, chromosomes are compacted into centrally located nucleoids, being orderly folded as opposed to consisting of random coils of DNA. In these bacteria, there is a separation of transcription and translation, such that transcription by RNA polymerase occurs on the nucleoids, and translation takes place mostly at the cell poles and directly underneath the cell membrane, because 70S ribosomes accumulate at sites surrounding the nucleoids. Interestingly, accumulation of ribosomes appears to slow down diffusion of enzymes, noticeable for larger enzyme complexes, while nucleoids provide areas of confined motion for DNA-binding proteins, yet acceleration zones for non-DNA-binding proteins. Crowded regions at the cell poles set up zones of higher concentration of the translation machinery, shortening diffusion distances for rate-limiting translation factor/ribosome interactions, and of metabolic enzymes, possibly speeding up pathways containing low concentrations of metabolites. Thus, heterogeneous diffusion adds another layer of subcellular organization on top of cytoskeletal elements.

Being frequently exposed to foreign nucleic acids, bacteria and archaea have developed an ingenious adaptive defense system, called CRISPR-Cas. The system is composed of the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) array, together with CRISPR (cas)-associated genes. This system consists of a complex machinery that integrates fragments of foreign nucleic acids from viruses and mobile genetic elements (MGEs), into CRISPR arrays. The inserted segments (spacers) are transcribed and then used by cas proteins as guide RNAs for recognition and inactivation of the targets. Different types and families of CRISPR-Cas systems consist of distinct adaptation and effector modules with evolutionary trajectories, partially independent. The origin of the effector modules and the mechanism of spacer integration/deletion is far less clear. A review of the most recent data regarding the structure, ecology, and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems and their role in the modulation of accessory genomes in prokaryotes is proposed in this article. The CRISPR-Cas system's impact on the physiology and ecology of prokaryotes, modulation of horizontal gene transfer events, is also discussed here. This system gained popularity after it was proposed as a tool for plant and animal embryo editing, in cancer therapy, as antimicrobial against pathogenic bacteria, and even for combating the novel coronavirus - SARS-CoV-2; thus, the newest and promising applications are reviewed as well.

The trans-translation process is a ribosomal rescue system for stalled ribosomes processing truncated mRNA. The genes ssrA and smpB fulfil the key functions in most bacteria, but some species have either lost these genes or the function of the ribosomal rescue system is taken over by other genes. To date, the ribosomal rescue system has not been analysed in detail for the Acholeplasmataceae. This family, in the Mollicutes class, comprises the genus Acholeplasma and the provisional taxon "Candidatus Phytoplasma". Despite their monophyletic origin, the two clades can be separated by traits such as not representing primary pathogens for acholeplasmas versus being phytopathogenic for the majority of phytoplasmas. Both taxa share reduced genomes, but only phytoplasma genomes are characterised by a remarkable level of instability and reduction. Despite the general relevance of the ribosomal rescue system, information is lacking on coding, the genomic context and pseudogenisation of smpB and ssrA and their possible application as a phylogenetic marker. Herein, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the ribosomal rescue system in members of Acholeplasmataceae. The examined Acholeplasmataceae genomes encode a ribosomal rescue system, which depends on tmRNA encoded by ssrA acting in combination with its binding protein SmpB. Conserved gene synteny is evident for smpB, while ssrA shows a less conserved genomic context. Analysis of the tmRNA sequences highlights the variability of proteolysis tag sequences and short conserved sites at the 5'- and 3'-ends. Analyses of smpB provided no hints regarding the coding of pseudogenes, but they did suggest its application as a phylogenetic marker of Acholeplasmataceae - in accordance with 16S rDNA topology. Sequence variability of smpB provides sufficient information for species assignment and phylogenetic analysis.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens has two polyphosphate (polyP) kinases, one of which (PPK1AT) is responsible for the formation of polyP granules, while the other (PPK2AT) is used for replenishing the NTP pools by using polyP as a phosphate donor to phosphorylate nucleoside diphosphates. Fusions of eYFP with PPK2AT or of the polyP granule-associated phosin PptA from Ralstonia eutropha always co-localized with polyP granules in A. tumefaciens and allowed the tracking of polyP granules in time-lapse microscopy experiments without the necessity to label the cells with the toxic dye DAPI. Fusions of PPK1AT with mCherry formed fluorescent signals often attached to, but not completely co-localizing with, polyP granules in wild-type cells. Time-lapse microscopy revealed that polyP granules in about one-third of a cell population migrated from the old pole to the new cell pole shortly before or during cell division. Many cells de novo formed a second (nonmigrating) polyP granule at the opposite cell pole before cell division was completed, resulting in two daughter cells each having a polyP granule at the old pole after septum formation. Migration of polyP granules was disordered in mitomycin C-treated or in PopZ-depleted cells, suggesting that polyP granules can associate with DNA or with other molecules that are segregated during the cell cycle.

DNA supercoiling and nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) are two of the factors that govern the architecture of the bacterial genome, influencing the expression of the genetic information that it contains. Alterations to DNA topology, and to the numbers and types of NAPs, have pleiotropic effects on gene expression, suggesting that modifications to the production patterns of DNA topoisomerases and/or NAPs are likely to result in marked impacts on bacterial physiology. Knockout mutations in the genes encoding these proteins (where the mutants remain viable) result in clear physiological effects. However, genetic modifications that involve rewiring, or repositioning, of topoisomerase or NAP genes produce much more subtle outcomes. These findings demonstrate that the high-level regulatory circuitry of bacteria is robust in the face of genomic rearrangements that, a priori, might be expected to produce significant changes in bacterial lifestyle. Examples from genomic rewiring experiments, performed chiefly with the Gram-negative model bacteria Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, will be used to illustrate these features. The results show not only the ability of naturally occurring bacteria to tolerate regulatory rewiring but also indicate the limits within which experiments in synthetic biology may be designed.