Mediterranean Journal of Hematology and Infectious Diseases最新文献

Background: Viral infections can cause direct and indirect damage to hematopoietic stem cells. The objectives of this study were to identify the frequency and severity of aplastic anemia in children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as recognize the response to treatment.

Methodology: 13 children with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia were enrolled in this prospective clinical trial. Blood samples were obtained from all patients to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for reverse-transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction to detect SARS-CoV-2 viruses. According to the laboratory results, patients were classified as having SARS-CoV-2 positive antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 negative antibodies. Both groups received combined cyclosporine (CsA) + Eltrombopag (E-PAG). The hematological response, either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), no response (NR), and overall response (OR) rates of combined E-PAG + CsA treatment after 6 months were evaluated.

Results: Four children were recognized to have aplastic anemia and SARS-CoV-2 positive antibodies. Two patients fulfilled the hematological criteria for CR and no longer required transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) or platelets, and one had PR and was still PRBC transfusion-dependent but no longer required platelet transfusion. The remaining patient showed NR, and he had died before reaching the top of the HSCT waiting list. Moreover, six patients in the SARS-CoV-2 negative antibodies group had CR, while three patients had PR. The difference in ANC, Hg, and platelet counts between both groups was not significant.

Conclusion: The SARS-CoV-2 virus is added to several viral infections known to be implicated in the pathogenesis of aplastic anemia. Studies are needed to establish a definitive association and determine whether the response of bone marrow failure to standard therapy differs from that of idiopathic cases.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cyclophosphamide administered after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from 9/10 HLA-Matched Unrelated Donors (MMUD) increases the rates of bacterial, fungal, viral infections, complications (hemorrhagic cystitis (HC)), and infection-related mortality compared to allogeneic stem cell transplantation from matched related donors (MRD).

Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study. 45 MMUD ASCT patients who received posttransplant cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+calcineurin inhibitor compared with 45 MRD ASCT patients who received methotrexate+calcineurin inhibitor.

Results: Although there was a statistically significant prolongation of neutrophil engraftment time in the PTCy arm, there was no statistically significant difference in bacterial infection frequencies between the groups (PTCy; 9 (20%), control; 8 (17.8%), p=0.778). The distribution of CMV infection in the first 100 days was similar (p=0.827), but the distribution of CMV infection rate between the 100th and 365th days was observed more frequently in the control group (p=0.005). HC rates and their grades were similar in both groups (PTCy; 4 (8.8%), control; 6 (13.3%) p=0.502). The rates of VZV infection and invasive aspergillosis were similar in the PTCy and control groups (13.3% in the PTCy and 17.8% in the control group p=0.561). There is also no statistically significant difference in survival analysis (OS, LFS, GRFS, RI, IRM, NRM) between groups. However, the incidence of cGVHD was significantly higher in the control group (P=0.035).

Conclusions: The addition of PTCy to standard GvHD prophylaxis in MMUD ASCT does not lead to an increase in CMV reactivation, bacterial infections, invasive fungal infection, viral hemorrhagic cystitis, or mortality.

The objective of this two-part review is to present a current and comprehensive understanding of the diagnosis and management of plasmablastic lymphoma. The first part, which was published previously, focused on the study of epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological characteristics, differential diagnosis, prognostic variables, and the impact of plasmablastic lymphoma on specific populations. This second part addresses the difficult topic of the treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma, specifically examining both the conventional, consolidated approach and the novel therapeutic strategy.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, DOACs represent the gold standard for long-term anticoagulation, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit low-intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for clinical usage as secondary VTE prophylaxis, there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety with a long follow-up.

Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with a follow-up ≥ 12 months.

Results: The examined patients were 323. The median low-dose DOAC administration time was 25.40 months (IQR 13.93-45.90). Twelve (3.7%) VTE recurrences were observed; 21 bleeding events were registered (6.5%), including one episode of Major bleeding (MB) (0.3%), 8 Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (2.5%) and 12 minor bleeding (3.7%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between the rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Patients included in the study for multiple episodes of VTE presented a significantly higher risk of a new VTE recurrence during low-intensity DOAC.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence; however, attention might be needed in their choice in such a scenario for patients who experienced multiple episodes of VTE.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell lymphoid neoplasia and, in some instances, improved disease outcomes. Thus, six FDA-approved commercial CAR-T cell products that target antigens preferentially expressed on malignant B-cells or plasma cells have been introduced in the therapy of B-cell lymphomas, B-ALLs, and multiple myeloma. These therapeutic successes have triggered the application of CAR-T cell therapy to other hematologic tumors, including T-cell malignancies. However, the success of CAR-T cell therapies in T-cell neoplasms was considerably more limited due to the existence of some limiting factors, such as: 1) the sharing of mutual antigens between normal T-cells and CAR-T cells and malignant cells, determining fratricide events and severe T-cell aplasia; 2) the contamination of CAR-T cells used for CAR transduction with malignant T-cells. Allogeneic CAR-T products can avoid tumor contamination but raise other problems related to immunological incompatibility. In spite of these limitations, there has been significant progress in CD7- and CD5-targeted CAR-T cell therapy of T-cell malignancies in the last few years.