首页 > 最新文献

Minerva anestesiologica最新文献

英文 中文
Diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma in pregnancy. 妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤的诊断与治疗。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19461-3
Silvia Poma, Rossana Lamastra, Chiara Baldi, Federica Broglia, Maria Ciceri, Marinella Fuardo, Federica Morgante, Simona Pellicori, Maria P Delmonte, Alessandro Locatelli
{"title":"Diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma in pregnancy.","authors":"Silvia Poma, Rossana Lamastra, Chiara Baldi, Federica Broglia, Maria Ciceri, Marinella Fuardo, Federica Morgante, Simona Pellicori, Maria P Delmonte, Alessandro Locatelli","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19461-3","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19461-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"116-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145251968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delirium after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an underrecognized target for perioperative standardization. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后谵妄:围手术期标准化的一个未被充分认识的目标。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.26.19818-6
Karuna Rajkumar, Ettore Crimi
{"title":"Delirium after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an underrecognized target for perioperative standardization.","authors":"Karuna Rajkumar, Ettore Crimi","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.26.19818-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.26.19818-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"92 1-2","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of high flow nasal cannula versus procedural oxygen mask for hypoxemia prevention during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized parallel-group trial. 内镜逆行胆管造影术中高流量鼻插管与程序性氧罩预防低氧血症的比较:一项随机平行组试验。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19322-X
Bedirhan Gunel, Ayse Sencan, Tunahan Cevik, Zeki Islamoglu, Mehmet Yilmaz

Background: This study investigated the effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and Procedural Oxygen Mask (POM) on oxygenation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed under sedation in the semi-prone position.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial, 198 patients scheduled for ERCP between March 7th and June 3rd, 2025, were assessed; 150 were randomized to receive oxygen via HFNC or POM (75 each). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2<90% for ≥10 seconds) during ERCP. Secondary outcomes included the duration of hypoxemia, the number of hypoxemic episodes per patient, and the lowest recorded SpO2, along with the incidence of airway interventions, the incidence of procedure-disrupting body motions, hemodynamic changes, and satisfaction scores from both gastroenterologists and patients.

Results: Hypoxemia occurred in five patients (6.7%) in the HFNC group and in one patient (1.3%) in the POM group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.209). No significant differences were found in any secondary outcomes between the groups (P>0.003). In multiple logistic regression analysis, only weight was significantly associated with hypoxemia risk (aOR=1.091; 95% CI: 1.001-1.189; P=0.048), while no significant difference was found between the HFNC and POMTM groups (aOR=9.357; 95% CI: 0.815-107.447; P=0.073).

Conclusions: POM appears to be a practical alternative to HFNC for oxygen supplementation during ERCP under sedation in the semi-prone position, with comparable hypoxemia incidence and airway-related outcomes. These results suggest that POM can be effectively used in this clinical setting.

背景:本研究探讨了高流量鼻插管(HFNC)和程序性氧气面罩(POM™)在镇静半俯卧位下进行内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)时对氧合的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、平行组试验中,对198例计划于2025年3月7日至6月3日接受ERCP的患者进行评估;150人随机接受HFNC或POM™供氧(各75人)。主要结果是低氧血症(SpO22)的发生率,以及气道干预的发生率,手术中断的身体运动的发生率,血流动力学变化以及胃肠病学家和患者的满意度评分。结果:HFNC组5例(6.7%)患者出现低氧血症,POM™组1例(1.3%)患者出现低氧血症;但差异无统计学意义(P=0.209)。两组间的次要结局无显著差异(P < 0.003)。在多元logistic回归分析中,只有体重与低氧血症风险显著相关(aOR=1.091; 95% CI: 1.001 ~ 1.189; P=0.048),而HFNC组与POMTM组之间无显著差异(aOR=9.357; 95% CI: 0.815 ~ 107.447; P=0.073)。结论:POM™似乎是半俯卧位镇静下ERCP期间HFNC补充氧的实用替代方案,低氧血症发生率和气道相关结果相当。这些结果表明POM™可以有效地用于这种临床环境。
{"title":"Comparison of high flow nasal cannula versus procedural oxygen mask for hypoxemia prevention during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized parallel-group trial.","authors":"Bedirhan Gunel, Ayse Sencan, Tunahan Cevik, Zeki Islamoglu, Mehmet Yilmaz","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19322-X","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19322-X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated the effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and Procedural Oxygen Mask<sup>™</sup> (POM<sup>™</sup>) on oxygenation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed under sedation in the semi-prone position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial, 198 patients scheduled for ERCP between March 7<sup>th</sup> and June 3<sup>rd</sup>, 2025, were assessed; 150 were randomized to receive oxygen via HFNC or POM<sup>™</sup> (75 each). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO<inf>2</inf><90% for ≥10 seconds) during ERCP. Secondary outcomes included the duration of hypoxemia, the number of hypoxemic episodes per patient, and the lowest recorded SpO<inf>2</inf>, along with the incidence of airway interventions, the incidence of procedure-disrupting body motions, hemodynamic changes, and satisfaction scores from both gastroenterologists and patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypoxemia occurred in five patients (6.7%) in the HFNC group and in one patient (1.3%) in the POM<sup>™</sup> group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.209). No significant differences were found in any secondary outcomes between the groups (P>0.003). In multiple logistic regression analysis, only weight was significantly associated with hypoxemia risk (aOR=1.091; 95% CI: 1.001-1.189; P=0.048), while no significant difference was found between the HFNC and POM<sup>TM</sup> groups (aOR=9.357; 95% CI: 0.815-107.447; P=0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POM<sup>™</sup> appears to be a practical alternative to HFNC for oxygen supplementation during ERCP under sedation in the semi-prone position, with comparable hypoxemia incidence and airway-related outcomes. These results suggest that POM<sup>™</sup> can be effectively used in this clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"40-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative management after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and postoperative delirium assessment: a nationwide Italian survey. 经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的围手术期管理和术后谵妄评估:一项意大利全国性调查。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19434-0
Filippo M Russo, Chiara Fiorentini, Fabio Sangalli, Sabino Scolletta, Blanca Martinez-Lopez DE Arroyabe, Maria C Conti, Andrea Farinaccio, Valentina Coltelli, Simona Silvetti, Mattia Meattelli, Cecilia Bianchi, Massimo Baiocchi, Maria Benedetto, Fabrizio Monaco, Alessia Artale, Giuseppe Cangiano, Mauro D'Amora, Umberto DI Dedda, Tommaso Aloisio, Marco Ranucci, Cristina Santonocito, Francesco Federici, Cesira Palmeri DI Villalba, Pietro Bertini, Giacomo Grasselli, Michele G Mondino, Gianluca Paternoster, Paolo Meani, Valentina Ajello

Background: Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) are at risk for delirium. In Italy, the perioperative management of TAVR lacks standardization: this survey aims to investigate TAVR management across the country, focusing on delirium.

Methods: A multiple-choice survey was conducted anonymously among 40 high-volume cardiac surgery centers in Italy: questions addressed logistics, surgical procedures, anesthetic management and delirium assessment.

Results: The response rate was 68%. Low-volume centers were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 22 hospitals, including 7 of the top 10 highest-volume TAVR centers in Italy. Only 36% of the participating centers routinely assessed delirium onset after TAVR, and just 18% utilized a validated delirium diagnostic scale. Only one-third of the hospitals systematically assessed patient frailty in the preoperative period. Fast-track protocols for TAVR patients were implemented in 68% of the centers. The transfemoral approach was consistently the first choice, with conscious sedation being the preferred anesthetic strategy (82%). Invasive blood pressure monitoring with a dedicated line was routinely performed in 91% of centers, while urinary catheters were used in half of the hospitals, including 47% of those with fast-track protocols. Postoperatively, 55% of patients were admitted to a Subacute or Coronary Care Unit, while 41% were managed in the Cardiology ward. In most cases, the hospital length of stay was three days or more.

Conclusions: This survey reveals substantial heterogeneity in perioperative management, delirium prevention and assessment after TAVR in Italy. This heterogeneity may contribute to differences in hospital stay and clinical outcomes.

背景:接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的患者存在谵妄的风险。在意大利,TAVR的围手术期管理缺乏规范化:本调查旨在调查全国TAVR的管理情况,重点是谵妄。方法:在意大利40家大容量心脏手术中心进行匿名多项选择调查:问题涉及后勤、手术程序、麻醉管理和谵妄评估。结果:有效率为68%。低容量中心被排除在外,最终样本为22家医院,包括意大利10家容量最高的TAVR中心中的7家。只有36%的参与中心常规评估TAVR后谵妄发作,只有18%的中心使用有效的谵妄诊断量表。只有三分之一的医院在术前系统地评估患者的虚弱程度。68%的中心实施了TAVR患者的快速通道方案。经股入路始终是首选,有意识镇静是首选的麻醉策略(82%)。91%的医疗中心常规使用专用线路进行侵入性血压监测,一半的医院使用导尿管,其中47%采用快速通道方案。术后,55%的患者住进亚急性或冠状动脉监护室,41%的患者住进心脏病病房。在大多数情况下,住院时间为三天或更长。结论:该调查揭示了意大利TAVR术后围手术期管理、谵妄预防和评估的巨大异质性。这种异质性可能导致住院时间和临床结果的差异。
{"title":"Perioperative management after transcatheter aortic valve replacement and postoperative delirium assessment: a nationwide Italian survey.","authors":"Filippo M Russo, Chiara Fiorentini, Fabio Sangalli, Sabino Scolletta, Blanca Martinez-Lopez DE Arroyabe, Maria C Conti, Andrea Farinaccio, Valentina Coltelli, Simona Silvetti, Mattia Meattelli, Cecilia Bianchi, Massimo Baiocchi, Maria Benedetto, Fabrizio Monaco, Alessia Artale, Giuseppe Cangiano, Mauro D'Amora, Umberto DI Dedda, Tommaso Aloisio, Marco Ranucci, Cristina Santonocito, Francesco Federici, Cesira Palmeri DI Villalba, Pietro Bertini, Giacomo Grasselli, Michele G Mondino, Gianluca Paternoster, Paolo Meani, Valentina Ajello","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19434-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19434-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) are at risk for delirium. In Italy, the perioperative management of TAVR lacks standardization: this survey aims to investigate TAVR management across the country, focusing on delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiple-choice survey was conducted anonymously among 40 high-volume cardiac surgery centers in Italy: questions addressed logistics, surgical procedures, anesthetic management and delirium assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 68%. Low-volume centers were excluded, resulting in a final sample of 22 hospitals, including 7 of the top 10 highest-volume TAVR centers in Italy. Only 36% of the participating centers routinely assessed delirium onset after TAVR, and just 18% utilized a validated delirium diagnostic scale. Only one-third of the hospitals systematically assessed patient frailty in the preoperative period. Fast-track protocols for TAVR patients were implemented in 68% of the centers. The transfemoral approach was consistently the first choice, with conscious sedation being the preferred anesthetic strategy (82%). Invasive blood pressure monitoring with a dedicated line was routinely performed in 91% of centers, while urinary catheters were used in half of the hospitals, including 47% of those with fast-track protocols. Postoperatively, 55% of patients were admitted to a Subacute or Coronary Care Unit, while 41% were managed in the Cardiology ward. In most cases, the hospital length of stay was three days or more.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey reveals substantial heterogeneity in perioperative management, delirium prevention and assessment after TAVR in Italy. This heterogeneity may contribute to differences in hospital stay and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"92 1-2","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146226473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erector spinae plane block versus fascia iliaca block for hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 竖脊肌平面阻滞与髂筋膜阻滞用于髋关节置换术:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19244-4
André B DE Donato, Rodrigo Suetsugu, Beatriz Santana, Bernardo R Guimarães, Felipe R V Lima, Eduardo M Pereira, Sara Amaral

Introduction: Hip arthroplasty is a frequently performed surgery that requires effective multimodal analgesia for optimal recovery and adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Traditionally, spinal anesthesia with opioids has been the mainstay for postoperative pain management, but side effects have prompted increased use of peripheral nerve blocks. The fascia iliaca block (FIB) is a well-established technique recommended by PROSPECT guidelines, while the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently emerged as a potential alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of FIB and ESPB in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase identified six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 348 patients, evenly distributed between ESPB and FIB groups. Primary outcomes included incidence of motor block, cumulative opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative pain scores.

Evidence synthesis: The analysis revealed that ESPB significantly reduced the incidence of quadriceps motor block compared to FIB, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.13-0.49; P<0.001). Motor block occurred in 8.7% of ESPB patients versus 38.4% of FIB patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, or pain scores at rest or during movement.

Conclusions: ESPB offers a clear advantage over FIB in preserving motor function without compromising analgesic efficacy. These findings support ESPB as a viable alternative to FIB in hip arthroplasty pain management protocols.

简介:髋关节置换术是一种经常进行的手术,需要有效的多模式镇痛,以获得最佳的恢复,并在手术后遵守增强的恢复协议。传统上,阿片类脊髓麻醉一直是术后疼痛管理的主要方法,但副作用已促使周围神经阻滞的使用增加。髂筋膜阻滞(FIB)是PROSPECT指南推荐的一种成熟的技术,而竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)最近成为一种潜在的替代方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较FIB和ESPB在髋关节置换术患者中的疗效。证据获取:PubMed, Cochrane和Embase的综合检索确定了6项随机对照试验(rct),包括348例患者,均匀分布在ESPB组和FIB组之间。主要结局包括运动阻滞发生率、阿片类药物累积消耗、首次抢救镇痛时间和术后疼痛评分。证据综合:分析显示,与FIB相比,ESPB可显著降低股四头肌运动阻滞的发生率,相对风险(RR)为0.25 (95% CI, 0.13-0.49)。结论:ESPB在保持运动功能而不影响镇痛效果方面明显优于FIB。这些发现支持ESPB作为髋关节置换术疼痛管理方案中FIB的可行替代方案。
{"title":"Erector spinae plane block versus fascia iliaca block for hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"André B DE Donato, Rodrigo Suetsugu, Beatriz Santana, Bernardo R Guimarães, Felipe R V Lima, Eduardo M Pereira, Sara Amaral","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19244-4","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19244-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hip arthroplasty is a frequently performed surgery that requires effective multimodal analgesia for optimal recovery and adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Traditionally, spinal anesthesia with opioids has been the mainstay for postoperative pain management, but side effects have prompted increased use of peripheral nerve blocks. The fascia iliaca block (FIB) is a well-established technique recommended by PROSPECT guidelines, while the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently emerged as a potential alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of FIB and ESPB in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase identified six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 348 patients, evenly distributed between ESPB and FIB groups. Primary outcomes included incidence of motor block, cumulative opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative pain scores.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The analysis revealed that ESPB significantly reduced the incidence of quadriceps motor block compared to FIB, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.13-0.49; P<0.001). Motor block occurred in 8.7% of ESPB patients versus 38.4% of FIB patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, or pain scores at rest or during movement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESPB offers a clear advantage over FIB in preserving motor function without compromising analgesic efficacy. These findings support ESPB as a viable alternative to FIB in hip arthroplasty pain management protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145952425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of andexanet alfa for life-threatening hemorrhagic shock in a DOAC-treated patient due to atraumatic splenic rupture and unexpected diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. 使用anddexanet治疗因非外伤性脾破裂和意外诊断为内脏利什曼病的doac治疗患者的危及生命的失血性休克。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19398-X
Peggy Ruggiano, Silvia Stefanini, Germana Ruggiano, Maddalena Pazzi, Duccio Conti
{"title":"The use of andexanet alfa for life-threatening hemorrhagic shock in a DOAC-treated patient due to atraumatic splenic rupture and unexpected diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis.","authors":"Peggy Ruggiano, Silvia Stefanini, Germana Ruggiano, Maddalena Pazzi, Duccio Conti","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19398-X","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19398-X","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"106-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145251981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral nerve block analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 经皮肾镜取石术后周围神经阻滞镇痛:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19210-9
Fei Deng, Ting Li, Huijuan Chen, Lei Zhu, Jilong Ma, Dongqing Ren

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common surgical procedure for the removal of kidney stones. Adequate postoperative analgesia is crucial for enhancing recovery and minimizing complications. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have emerged as a promising method for managing postoperative pain in PCNL patients. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aim to evaluate the efficacy of various PNBs for analgesia after PCNL.

Evidence acquisition: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different PNBs or PNBs with no block after PCNL were included. The primary outcome was the total morphine consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively. The NMA was performed using Stata 15.1 software.

Evidence synthesis: We included 38 RCTs involving 2,339 patients and assessed seven analgesic techniques. The total morphine consumption was most significantly reduced by intercostal nerve block (ICNB), followed by peritubal infiltration (PI) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). At six hours postoperatively, the resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were lower with ICNB, followed by PI and ESPB. At 12 hours, resting VAS scores decreased with paravertebral block (PVB), followed by ICNB and PI. At 24 hours, resting VAS scores were reduced by PVB, then epidural block (EB), and ICNB. For dynamic-induced pain at six hours, VAS scores were decreased by quadratus lumborum block (QLB), followed by ICNB and PI. At 12 hours, dynamic VAS scores were lower with ESPB, followed by ICNB and PI. At 24 hours, dynamic VAS scores decreased with PVB, followed by EB and ICNB. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were reduced by ICNB, followed by PI and PVB. The time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged with ICNB, followed by QLB and PI. The number of patients requiring additional analgesics were decreased with ICNB, followed by PI and QLB.

Conclusions: The NMA indicated that ICNB was likely the optimal technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PCNL. In contrast, the TAPB appears to be less effective.

导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种常见的肾结石切除手术。术后适当的镇痛对于增强恢复和减少并发症是至关重要的。周围神经阻滞(PNBs)已成为治疗PCNL患者术后疼痛的一种很有前途的方法。本系统综述和网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评价各种pnb对PCNL术后镇痛的疗效。证据获取:截至2025年4月,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library等电子数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。随机对照试验(rct)比较不同的pnb或PCNL后无阻滞的pnb。主要观察指标为术后24小时内吗啡总消耗量。NMA采用Stata 15.1软件进行。证据综合:我们纳入了38项随机对照试验,涉及2339例患者,评估了7种镇痛技术。肋间神经阻滞(ICNB)对吗啡总用量的影响最大,其次是膀胱周围浸润(PI)和直立棘面阻滞(ESPB)。术后6小时,ICNB组的静息视觉模拟评分(VAS)较低,其次是PI和ESPB。12小时时,静息VAS评分随椎旁阻滞(PVB)下降,其次是ICNB和PI。24小时时,PVB、硬膜外阻滞(EB)和ICNB降低静息VAS评分。对于6小时动态疼痛,腰方肌阻滞(QLB)降低VAS评分,其次是ICNB和PI。12小时时,ESPB组的动态VAS评分较低,其次是ICNB和PI。24小时时,动态VAS评分随PVB下降,其次是EB和ICNB。ICNB减少术后恶心呕吐(PONV),其次是PI和PVB。ICNB延长首次抢救镇痛时间,QLB和PI依次延长。ICNB组需要额外镇痛药的患者数量减少,其次是PI和QLB组。结论:NMA显示ICNB可能是PCNL患者术后镇痛的最佳技术。相比之下,TAPB似乎没有那么有效。
{"title":"Peripheral nerve block analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Fei Deng, Ting Li, Huijuan Chen, Lei Zhu, Jilong Ma, Dongqing Ren","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19210-9","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19210-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common surgical procedure for the removal of kidney stones. Adequate postoperative analgesia is crucial for enhancing recovery and minimizing complications. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have emerged as a promising method for managing postoperative pain in PCNL patients. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aim to evaluate the efficacy of various PNBs for analgesia after PCNL.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different PNBs or PNBs with no block after PCNL were included. The primary outcome was the total morphine consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively. The NMA was performed using Stata 15.1 software.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>We included 38 RCTs involving 2,339 patients and assessed seven analgesic techniques. The total morphine consumption was most significantly reduced by intercostal nerve block (ICNB), followed by peritubal infiltration (PI) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). At six hours postoperatively, the resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were lower with ICNB, followed by PI and ESPB. At 12 hours, resting VAS scores decreased with paravertebral block (PVB), followed by ICNB and PI. At 24 hours, resting VAS scores were reduced by PVB, then epidural block (EB), and ICNB. For dynamic-induced pain at six hours, VAS scores were decreased by quadratus lumborum block (QLB), followed by ICNB and PI. At 12 hours, dynamic VAS scores were lower with ESPB, followed by ICNB and PI. At 24 hours, dynamic VAS scores decreased with PVB, followed by EB and ICNB. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were reduced by ICNB, followed by PI and PVB. The time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged with ICNB, followed by QLB and PI. The number of patients requiring additional analgesics were decreased with ICNB, followed by PI and QLB.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NMA indicated that ICNB was likely the optimal technique for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing PCNL. In contrast, the TAPB appears to be less effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"69-80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145251919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perioperative management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a state of the art. 采用腹腔热化疗的细胞减少手术患者的围手术期管理:一项新技术。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19179-7
Mohamed A Daghmouri, Maxime Coutrot, Josefine Baekgaard, Emmanuel Dudoignon, Kevin Hakkakian, Mathilde Ponsin, Delphine Cheron-Leroy, Daniel Pietrasz, Diane Goere, François Depret, Benjamin Deniau

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered the standard of care for the treatment of primary and secondary peritoneal malignancies. Based on the combination of intravenous and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following surgical removal of the macroscopic tumor, CRS with HIPEC is associated with increased survival and reduced five-year mortality. However, CRS with HIPEC induces pathophysiological changes that require rigorous intraoperative management. Thus, CRS with HIPEC remains a challenge for anesthesiologists in the preoperative (e.g. patients selection, prehabilitation), perioperative (e.g. hemodynamic monitoring, ventilation) and postoperative periods. Unfortunately, there are few recent articles discussing intraoperative aspects and guidelines based on a standardized expert consensus process. Based on the most recent studies and expert consensus available on the subject, this review summarizes the challenges faced by anesthesiologists and intensivists regarding the pathophysiology and changes induced by CRS in HIPEC during the perioperative period.

细胞减少手术(CRS)与腹腔内高温化疗(HIPEC)被认为是治疗原发性和继发性腹膜恶性肿瘤的标准护理。基于宏观肿瘤手术切除后静脉和腹腔内热化疗的联合,CRS合并HIPEC与生存率增加和5年死亡率降低相关。然而,伴有HIPEC的CRS会引起病理生理变化,需要严格的术中管理。因此,HIPEC合并CRS在术前(如患者选择、康复前)、围手术期(如血流动力学监测、通气)和术后仍是麻醉师面临的挑战。不幸的是,最近很少有文章讨论基于标准化专家共识过程的术中方面和指南。基于最新的研究和专家共识,本文总结了麻醉医生和强化医生在HIPEC围手术期CRS引起的病理生理和变化方面面临的挑战。
{"title":"Perioperative management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a state of the art.","authors":"Mohamed A Daghmouri, Maxime Coutrot, Josefine Baekgaard, Emmanuel Dudoignon, Kevin Hakkakian, Mathilde Ponsin, Delphine Cheron-Leroy, Daniel Pietrasz, Diane Goere, François Depret, Benjamin Deniau","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19179-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19179-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is considered the standard of care for the treatment of primary and secondary peritoneal malignancies. Based on the combination of intravenous and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following surgical removal of the macroscopic tumor, CRS with HIPEC is associated with increased survival and reduced five-year mortality. However, CRS with HIPEC induces pathophysiological changes that require rigorous intraoperative management. Thus, CRS with HIPEC remains a challenge for anesthesiologists in the preoperative (e.g. patients selection, prehabilitation), perioperative (e.g. hemodynamic monitoring, ventilation) and postoperative periods. Unfortunately, there are few recent articles discussing intraoperative aspects and guidelines based on a standardized expert consensus process. Based on the most recent studies and expert consensus available on the subject, this review summarizes the challenges faced by anesthesiologists and intensivists regarding the pathophysiology and changes induced by CRS in HIPEC during the perioperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"91 12","pages":"1205-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145989859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The analgesic effect of transversalis fascia plane block after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 剖宫产术后筋膜横肌平面阻滞的镇痛效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和meta分析。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19105-0
Mahmut S Tutar, Muhammed H Satici, Munise Yildiz, Betül Kozanhan

Introduction: Cesarean section is commonly linked to significant postoperative pain, which may hinder maternal recovery. Transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) has emerged as a regional anesthesia technique that may enhance pain control and reduce opioid requirements. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of TFPB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Evidence acquisition: Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251000597), a systematic search of five databases was conducted up to March 7, 2025. Included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing TFPB with placebo, no block, or other regional techniques such as transversus abdominis plane block, quadratus lumborum block, or ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks. Outcomes reflecting analgesic efficacy included time to first analgesic request, pain scores (at rest and during movement), 24-hour opioid consumption, and the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia. Opioid-related side effects were also assessed.

Evidence synthesis: Ten randomized controlled trials were included. TFPB significantly prolonged the time to first analgesic request compared to control or alternative techniques (SMD=2.328; 95% CI: 0.487 to 4.169; P=0.003) and reduced the need for rescue analgesia (OR=0.373; 95% CI: 0.172 to 0.81; P=0.013). Although the reduction in 24-hour opioid consumption was not statistically significant overall (SMD=-1.052; 95% CI: -2.549 to 0.445; P=0.169), subgroup analyses indicated benefit in selected settings. At 12 hours postoperatively, TFPB significantly reduced pain scores compared to placebo, both at rest (MD: -1.00; 95% CI: -1.756 to -0.244) and during movement (MD: -1.000; 95% CI: -1.749 to -0.251).

Conclusions: TFPB offers effective postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid use after cesarean section, with a safety profile comparable to other regional techniques.

剖宫产通常与明显的术后疼痛有关,这可能会阻碍产妇的康复。横筋膜平面阻滞(TFPB)已成为一种区域麻醉技术,可以加强疼痛控制和减少阿片类药物的需求。本研究通过随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析来评估TFPB的有效性和安全性。证据获取:遵循PRISMA指南并在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251000597),系统检索了五个数据库,直至2025年3月7日。纳入的研究是比较TFPB与安慰剂、无阻滞或其他局部技术(如腹横面阻滞、腰方肌阻滞或髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞)的随机对照试验。反映镇痛效果的结果包括首次要求镇痛的时间、疼痛评分(休息和运动时)、24小时阿片类药物消耗以及需要急救镇痛的患者比例。阿片类药物相关的副作用也进行了评估。证据综合:纳入10项随机对照试验。与对照组或替代方法相比,TFPB显著延长了首次请求镇痛的时间(SMD=2.328;95% CI: 0.487 ~ 4.169;P=0.003),减少了抢救性镇痛的需要(OR=0.373;95% CI: 0.172 ~ 0.81;P = 0.013)。虽然24小时阿片类药物消费量的减少总体上没有统计学意义(SMD=-1.052;95% CI: -2.549 ~ 0.445;P=0.169),亚组分析表明在选定的环境中获益。术后12小时,与安慰剂相比,TFPB显著降低了休息时的疼痛评分(MD: -1.00;95% CI: -1.756至-0.244)和运动期间(MD: -1.000;95% CI: -1.749至-0.251)。结论:TFPB提供了有效的术后镇痛,减少了剖宫产术后阿片类药物的使用,其安全性与其他区域技术相当。
{"title":"The analgesic effect of transversalis fascia plane block after cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mahmut S Tutar, Muhammed H Satici, Munise Yildiz, Betül Kozanhan","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19105-0","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19105-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cesarean section is commonly linked to significant postoperative pain, which may hinder maternal recovery. Transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) has emerged as a regional anesthesia technique that may enhance pain control and reduce opioid requirements. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of TFPB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251000597), a systematic search of five databases was conducted up to March 7, 2025. Included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing TFPB with placebo, no block, or other regional techniques such as transversus abdominis plane block, quadratus lumborum block, or ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blocks. Outcomes reflecting analgesic efficacy included time to first analgesic request, pain scores (at rest and during movement), 24-hour opioid consumption, and the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia. Opioid-related side effects were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Ten randomized controlled trials were included. TFPB significantly prolonged the time to first analgesic request compared to control or alternative techniques (SMD=2.328; 95% CI: 0.487 to 4.169; P=0.003) and reduced the need for rescue analgesia (OR=0.373; 95% CI: 0.172 to 0.81; P=0.013). Although the reduction in 24-hour opioid consumption was not statistically significant overall (SMD=-1.052; 95% CI: -2.549 to 0.445; P=0.169), subgroup analyses indicated benefit in selected settings. At 12 hours postoperatively, TFPB significantly reduced pain scores compared to placebo, both at rest (MD: -1.00; 95% CI: -1.756 to -0.244) and during movement (MD: -1.000; 95% CI: -1.749 to -0.251).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TFPB offers effective postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid use after cesarean section, with a safety profile comparable to other regional techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1181-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144732175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of esketamine as an adjuvant of ropivacaine on the efficacy of supraclavicular brachial plexus block in radius fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial. 艾氯胺酮辅助罗哌卡因对桡骨骨折锁骨上臂丛阻滞疗效的影响:一项随机对照试验。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19237-7
Ju Liu, Ye Zhang, Rui Zhang, Yuwen Wang, Peng Guo, Hong Chen, Xianwen Hu, Yun Wu

Background: Adding adjuvants to local anesthetics can improve the efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks. However, the literature supporting the advantages of esketamine on peripheral nerve blocks remains limited. This study aims to assess whether adjunctive esketamine enhances the duration of postoperative analgesia when added to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SBPB).

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 117 adult patients scheduled for distal radius fracture surgery received either 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine alone or 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine with 25 mg of esketamine in the SBPB. The primary outcome was the analgesic duration of SBPB, defined as the first time a patient experienced pain postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the SBPB onset time, motor block duration, and pain scores 48 h after surgery. The incidence of adverse events was recorded.

Results: No significant difference in analgesic duration was found between the two groups (11.3 [10.1, 12.4] h vs. 10.8 [9.4, 12.2] h, median difference = 0.3, 95% confidence interval, -0.4-1.0, P=0.344). Meanwhile, no significant differences were found in SBPB onset time, motor block duration, or pain scores between the groups. The incidences of Horner syndrome, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: Adding 25 mg esketamine to 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine did not improve the analgesic efficacy of SBPB in patients undergoing distal radius fracture surgery. These findings suggest that the limited benefits of esketamine in peripheral nerve blocks such as SBPB warrant further investigation to optimize agent design.

背景:局麻药中加入佐剂可提高周围神经阻滞的疗效。然而,支持艾氯胺酮对周围神经阻滞的优势的文献仍然有限。本研究旨在评估在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞(SBPB)中加入罗哌卡因辅助艾氯胺酮是否能延长术后镇痛时间。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,117例计划进行桡骨远端骨折手术的成年患者分别接受30ml 0.4%罗哌卡因单独或30ml 0.4%罗哌卡因加25mg艾氯胺酮的SBPB治疗。主要终点是SBPB的镇痛持续时间,定义为患者术后第一次经历疼痛。次要结局包括手术后48小时SBPB发作时间、运动阻滞持续时间和疼痛评分。记录不良事件的发生率。结果:两组患者镇痛时间差异无统计学意义(11.3 [10.1,12.4]h vs. 10.8 [9.4, 12.2] h,中位数差异=0.3,95%可信区间为-0.4 ~ 1.0,P=0.344)。同时,两组间SBPB发作时间、运动阻滞持续时间和疼痛评分均无显著差异。霍纳综合征、声音嘶哑、术后恶心和呕吐的发生率在两组之间具有可比性。结论:在0.4%罗哌卡因30 mL中加入25 mg艾氯胺酮并不能改善桡骨远端骨折手术患者的SBPB镇痛效果。这些发现表明,艾氯胺酮在SBPB等周围神经阻滞中的有限益处值得进一步研究以优化药物设计。
{"title":"Effect of esketamine as an adjuvant of ropivacaine on the efficacy of supraclavicular brachial plexus block in radius fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ju Liu, Ye Zhang, Rui Zhang, Yuwen Wang, Peng Guo, Hong Chen, Xianwen Hu, Yun Wu","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19237-7","DOIUrl":"10.23736/S0375-9393.25.19237-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adding adjuvants to local anesthetics can improve the efficacy of peripheral nerve blocks. However, the literature supporting the advantages of esketamine on peripheral nerve blocks remains limited. This study aims to assess whether adjunctive esketamine enhances the duration of postoperative analgesia when added to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SBPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 117 adult patients scheduled for distal radius fracture surgery received either 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine alone or 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine with 25 mg of esketamine in the SBPB. The primary outcome was the analgesic duration of SBPB, defined as the first time a patient experienced pain postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the SBPB onset time, motor block duration, and pain scores 48 h after surgery. The incidence of adverse events was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in analgesic duration was found between the two groups (11.3 [10.1, 12.4] h vs. 10.8 [9.4, 12.2] h, median difference = 0.3, 95% confidence interval, -0.4-1.0, P=0.344). Meanwhile, no significant differences were found in SBPB onset time, motor block duration, or pain scores between the groups. The incidences of Horner syndrome, hoarseness, postoperative nausea and vomiting were comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding 25 mg esketamine to 30 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine did not improve the analgesic efficacy of SBPB in patients undergoing distal radius fracture surgery. These findings suggest that the limited benefits of esketamine in peripheral nerve blocks such as SBPB warrant further investigation to optimize agent design.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1135-1145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145391156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1