Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-08-10DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000915
Samuel X Tan, Sharene Chong, Casey Rowe, Magdalena Claeson, James Dight, Chenhao Zhou, Mathieu P Rodero, Maryrose Malt, B Mark Smithers, Adele C Green, Kiarash Khosrotehrani
Identifying prognostic biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in stage I and II cutaneous melanomas could guide the clinical application of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (pSTAT5) as a biomarker in early-stage melanoma. This study evaluated all initially staged Ib and II melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy at a tertiary centre in Brisbane, Australia between 1994 and 2007, with survival data collected from the Queensland Cancer Registry. Primary melanoma tissue from 189 patients was analysed for pSTAT5 level through immunohistochemistry. Cox regression modelling, with adjustment for sex, age, ulceration, anatomical location, and Breslow depth, was applied to determine the association between pSTAT5 detection and melanoma-specific survival. Median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years. High pSTAT5 detection was associated with ulceration and increased tumour thickness. However, multivariate analysis indicated that high pSTAT5 detection was associated with improved melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.67) as compared to low pSTAT5 detection. This association persisted when pSTAT5 detection was limited to immune infiltrate or the vasculature, as well as when sentinel node positivity was accounted for. In this cohort, staining for high-pSTAT5 tumours identified a subset of melanoma patients with increased survival outcomes as compared to low-pSTAT5 tumours, despite the former having higher-risk clinicopathological characteristics at diagnosis. pSTAT5 is likely an indicator of local immune activation, and its detection could represent a useful tool to stratify the risk of melanoma progression.
{"title":"pSTAT5 is associated with improved survival in patients with thick or ulcerated primary cutaneous melanoma.","authors":"Samuel X Tan, Sharene Chong, Casey Rowe, Magdalena Claeson, James Dight, Chenhao Zhou, Mathieu P Rodero, Maryrose Malt, B Mark Smithers, Adele C Green, Kiarash Khosrotehrani","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000915","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000915","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying prognostic biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in stage I and II cutaneous melanomas could guide the clinical application of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (pSTAT5) as a biomarker in early-stage melanoma. This study evaluated all initially staged Ib and II melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy at a tertiary centre in Brisbane, Australia between 1994 and 2007, with survival data collected from the Queensland Cancer Registry. Primary melanoma tissue from 189 patients was analysed for pSTAT5 level through immunohistochemistry. Cox regression modelling, with adjustment for sex, age, ulceration, anatomical location, and Breslow depth, was applied to determine the association between pSTAT5 detection and melanoma-specific survival. Median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years. High pSTAT5 detection was associated with ulceration and increased tumour thickness. However, multivariate analysis indicated that high pSTAT5 detection was associated with improved melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.67) as compared to low pSTAT5 detection. This association persisted when pSTAT5 detection was limited to immune infiltrate or the vasculature, as well as when sentinel node positivity was accounted for. In this cohort, staining for high-pSTAT5 tumours identified a subset of melanoma patients with increased survival outcomes as compared to low-pSTAT5 tumours, despite the former having higher-risk clinicopathological characteristics at diagnosis. pSTAT5 is likely an indicator of local immune activation, and its detection could represent a useful tool to stratify the risk of melanoma progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46983586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The normative regimens recommendations for treating metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) are absent in the US. Recently, a phase III randomized clinical trial revealed that tebentafusp yielded a conspicuously longer overall survival than the control group. Based on the prominent efficacy, this study aimed to assess whether tebentafusp is cost-effective compared to the control group in patients with untreated mUM. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the perspective of US payers. Scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the conclusion uncertainty. Compared with control group, tebentafusp therapy yielded an additional 0.47 QALYs (1.19 vs. 0.72 QALYs) and an incremental cost of $444 280 ($633 822 vs. $189 542). The resultant ICER of $953 230/QALY far outweighed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $200 000/QALY. The ICER was always more than $750 000/QALY in all the univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Scenario analyses indicated that reducing the unit price of tebentafusp to $33.768/µg was associated with a favorable result of tebentafusp being cost-effective. For treatment-naive patients with mUM, the cost of tebentafusp therapy was not worth the improvement in survival benefits at the current price compared to the investigator's choice of therapy. The cost-effectiveness of tebentafusp could be promoted using value-based pricing.
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of an orphan drug tebentafusp in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma and a call for value-based pricing.","authors":"Shaohong Luo, Chen Xie, Ningning Lin, Dong Lin, Dian Gu, Shen Lin, Xiaoting Huang, Xiongwei Xu, Xiuhua Weng","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000919","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000919","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The normative regimens recommendations for treating metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) are absent in the US. Recently, a phase III randomized clinical trial revealed that tebentafusp yielded a conspicuously longer overall survival than the control group. Based on the prominent efficacy, this study aimed to assess whether tebentafusp is cost-effective compared to the control group in patients with untreated mUM. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the perspective of US payers. Scenario analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the conclusion uncertainty. Compared with control group, tebentafusp therapy yielded an additional 0.47 QALYs (1.19 vs. 0.72 QALYs) and an incremental cost of $444 280 ($633 822 vs. $189 542). The resultant ICER of $953 230/QALY far outweighed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $200 000/QALY. The ICER was always more than $750 000/QALY in all the univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Scenario analyses indicated that reducing the unit price of tebentafusp to $33.768/µg was associated with a favorable result of tebentafusp being cost-effective. For treatment-naive patients with mUM, the cost of tebentafusp therapy was not worth the improvement in survival benefits at the current price compared to the investigator's choice of therapy. The cost-effectiveness of tebentafusp could be promoted using value-based pricing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10178011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-09-22DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000927
Matthew W Boudreau, Emily J Tonogai, Claire P Schane, Min X Xi, James H Fischer, Jayanthi Vijayakumar, Yan Ji, Theodore M Tarasow, Timothy M Fan, Paul J Hergenrother, Arkadiusz Z Dudek
The treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma remains a major clinical challenge. Procaspase-3, a proapoptotic protein and precursor to the key apoptotic executioner caspase-3, is overexpressed in a wide range of malignancies, and the drug PAC-1 leverages this overexpression to selectively kill cancer cells. Herein, we investigate the efficacy of PAC-1 against uveal melanoma cell lines and report the synergistic combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib. This preclinical activity, tolerability data in mice, and the known clinical effectiveness of these drugs in human cancer patients led to a small Phase 1b study in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. The combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib was tolerated with no treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicities in these patients. The pharmacokinetics of entrectinib were not affected by PAC-1 treatment. In this small and heavily pretreated initial cohort, stable disease was observed in four out of six patients, with a median progression-free survival of 3.38 months (95% CI 1.6-6.5 months). This study is an initial demonstration that the combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib may warrant further clinical investigation. Clinical trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT04589832.
{"title":"The combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.","authors":"Matthew W Boudreau, Emily J Tonogai, Claire P Schane, Min X Xi, James H Fischer, Jayanthi Vijayakumar, Yan Ji, Theodore M Tarasow, Timothy M Fan, Paul J Hergenrother, Arkadiusz Z Dudek","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000927","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma remains a major clinical challenge. Procaspase-3, a proapoptotic protein and precursor to the key apoptotic executioner caspase-3, is overexpressed in a wide range of malignancies, and the drug PAC-1 leverages this overexpression to selectively kill cancer cells. Herein, we investigate the efficacy of PAC-1 against uveal melanoma cell lines and report the synergistic combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib. This preclinical activity, tolerability data in mice, and the known clinical effectiveness of these drugs in human cancer patients led to a small Phase 1b study in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. The combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib was tolerated with no treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicities in these patients. The pharmacokinetics of entrectinib were not affected by PAC-1 treatment. In this small and heavily pretreated initial cohort, stable disease was observed in four out of six patients, with a median progression-free survival of 3.38 months (95% CI 1.6-6.5 months). This study is an initial demonstration that the combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib may warrant further clinical investigation. Clinical trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT04589832.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615773/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41163672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive cancer of the skin arising from pigment-producing cells, known as melanocytes. It is notorious for spreading early to distant locations. Survival of patients with melanoma largely depends on the thickness of the lesion at the primary site thus spotting it early is crucial. Early diagnosis of melanoma, with an improved quality of life and treatment outcomes, is being achieved in some developed nations through screening and health education. On the contrary, as practicing pathologists in a resource-scarce country, we frequently encounter patients with locally advanced melanoma manifesting as ulceration, bleeding, fungation, and bone erosion. Several factors, including low socioeconomic status, medical mistrust, inaccessibility of health facilities, and absent screening and surveillance services can be attributed to the delayed diagnosis. Therefore to alleviate the burden and complications caused by the late presentation of cutaneous melanoma, an urgent massive community mobilization, information campaigning, and the provision of accessible basic primary health care are urgently needed.
{"title":"A glimpse at locally advanced melanomas in the settings of poverty: pathologist's viewpoint.","authors":"Wubshet Assefa, Serkadis Muluye, Andualem Assefa, Yacob Alemu","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000909","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive cancer of the skin arising from pigment-producing cells, known as melanocytes. It is notorious for spreading early to distant locations. Survival of patients with melanoma largely depends on the thickness of the lesion at the primary site thus spotting it early is crucial. Early diagnosis of melanoma, with an improved quality of life and treatment outcomes, is being achieved in some developed nations through screening and health education. On the contrary, as practicing pathologists in a resource-scarce country, we frequently encounter patients with locally advanced melanoma manifesting as ulceration, bleeding, fungation, and bone erosion. Several factors, including low socioeconomic status, medical mistrust, inaccessibility of health facilities, and absent screening and surveillance services can be attributed to the delayed diagnosis. Therefore to alleviate the burden and complications caused by the late presentation of cutaneous melanoma, an urgent massive community mobilization, information campaigning, and the provision of accessible basic primary health care are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10177436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have poor prognosis, albeit advances in locoregional and systemic treatments. The melanoma-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) effectively stratifies survival for patients with MBM. Nevertheless, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a well known prognostic factor for patients with melanoma, is not represented in the GPA scores and might add prognostic information for patients with MBM. In this study, 150 consecutive patients with MBM were retrospectively analyzed with the aim of evaluating independent prognostic factors for MBM patients, including LDH. Furthermore, we implemented a disease-specific prognostic score and estimated survival according to treatment modalities. On the basis of multivariable Cox regression analyses, six prognostic factors (age, BRAF status, number of MBM, number of extracranial metastatic sites, performance status, and LDH level) resulted statistically significant in terms of survival and were combined in a prognostic score to stratify patients in distinct prognostic groups ( P < 0.0001). Among treatment modalities, a multimodal approach with stereotactic radiosurgery or neurosurgery associated with systemic therapy showed the best outcome (median overall survival: 12.32 months, 95% confidence interval, 7.92-25.30). This is the first study to demonstrate that LDH has independent prognostic value for patients with MBM and might be used to improve prognostic stratification, albeit external validation is mandatory. Survival of patients with MBM is affected by both disease-specific risk factors and treatment modalities, with locoregional treatments associated with better outcomes.
{"title":"Estimating survival in patients with melanoma brain metastases: prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase.","authors":"Giacomo Pelizzari, Elisa Bertoli, Silvia Buriolla, Maria Grazia Vitale, Debora Basile, Lorenza Palmero, Diego Zara, Donatella Iacono, Freschi Andrea, Gaetano Pascoletti, Silvia Bolzonello, Mattia Garutti, Gianpiero Fasola, Fabio Puglisi, Alessandro Marco Minisini","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000907","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have poor prognosis, albeit advances in locoregional and systemic treatments. The melanoma-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) effectively stratifies survival for patients with MBM. Nevertheless, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a well known prognostic factor for patients with melanoma, is not represented in the GPA scores and might add prognostic information for patients with MBM. In this study, 150 consecutive patients with MBM were retrospectively analyzed with the aim of evaluating independent prognostic factors for MBM patients, including LDH. Furthermore, we implemented a disease-specific prognostic score and estimated survival according to treatment modalities. On the basis of multivariable Cox regression analyses, six prognostic factors (age, BRAF status, number of MBM, number of extracranial metastatic sites, performance status, and LDH level) resulted statistically significant in terms of survival and were combined in a prognostic score to stratify patients in distinct prognostic groups ( P < 0.0001). Among treatment modalities, a multimodal approach with stereotactic radiosurgery or neurosurgery associated with systemic therapy showed the best outcome (median overall survival: 12.32 months, 95% confidence interval, 7.92-25.30). This is the first study to demonstrate that LDH has independent prognostic value for patients with MBM and might be used to improve prognostic stratification, albeit external validation is mandatory. Survival of patients with MBM is affected by both disease-specific risk factors and treatment modalities, with locoregional treatments associated with better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10176585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-06-12DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000903
Judit Kisistók, Ditte Sigaard Christensen, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Lone Duval, Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen, Adam Andrzej Luczak, Boe Sandahl Sorensen, Martin Roelsgaard Jakobsen, Trine Heide Oellegaard, Nicolai Juul Birkbak
Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma, where nearly half of patients receive clinical benefit. However, immunotherapy is also associated with immune-related adverse events, which may be severe and persistent. It is therefore important to identify patients that do not benefit from therapy early. Currently, regularly scheduled CT scans are used to investigate size changes in target lesions to evaluate progression and therapy response. This study aims to explore if panel-based analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) taken at 3-week intervals may provide a window into the growing cancer, can be used to identify nonresponding patients early, and determine genomic alterations associated with acquired resistance to checkpoint immunotherapy without analysis of tumor tissue biopsies. We designed a gene panel for ctDNA analysis and sequenced 4-6 serial plasma samples from 24 patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors enrolled at the Department of Oncology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. TERT was the most mutated gene found in ctDNA and associated with a poor prognosis. We detected more ctDNA in patients with high metastatic load, which indicates that more aggressive tumors release more ctDNA into the bloodstream. Although we did not find evidence of specific mutations associated with acquired resistance, we did demonstrate in this limited cohort of 24 patients that untargeted, panel-based ctDNA analysis has the potential to be used as a minimally invasive tool in clinical practice to identify patients where the benefits of immunotherapy outweigh the drawbacks.
{"title":"Analysis of circulating tumor DNA during checkpoint inhibition in metastatic melanoma using a tumor-agnostic panel.","authors":"Judit Kisistók, Ditte Sigaard Christensen, Mads Heilskov Rasmussen, Lone Duval, Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen, Adam Andrzej Luczak, Boe Sandahl Sorensen, Martin Roelsgaard Jakobsen, Trine Heide Oellegaard, Nicolai Juul Birkbak","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000903","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma, where nearly half of patients receive clinical benefit. However, immunotherapy is also associated with immune-related adverse events, which may be severe and persistent. It is therefore important to identify patients that do not benefit from therapy early. Currently, regularly scheduled CT scans are used to investigate size changes in target lesions to evaluate progression and therapy response. This study aims to explore if panel-based analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) taken at 3-week intervals may provide a window into the growing cancer, can be used to identify nonresponding patients early, and determine genomic alterations associated with acquired resistance to checkpoint immunotherapy without analysis of tumor tissue biopsies. We designed a gene panel for ctDNA analysis and sequenced 4-6 serial plasma samples from 24 patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma and treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors enrolled at the Department of Oncology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. TERT was the most mutated gene found in ctDNA and associated with a poor prognosis. We detected more ctDNA in patients with high metastatic load, which indicates that more aggressive tumors release more ctDNA into the bloodstream. Although we did not find evidence of specific mutations associated with acquired resistance, we did demonstrate in this limited cohort of 24 patients that untargeted, panel-based ctDNA analysis has the potential to be used as a minimally invasive tool in clinical practice to identify patients where the benefits of immunotherapy outweigh the drawbacks.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470440/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10259753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-07-18DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000911
Kseniya A Glinkina, Amina F A S Teunisse, Maria Chiara Gelmi, Jelle de Vries, Martine J Jager, Aart G Jochemsen
Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular tumor in adults, representing approximately 5% of all melanoma cases. Up to 50% of uveal melanoma patients develop metastases that are resistant to most of the commonly used antineoplastic treatments. Virtually all uveal melanoma tumors harbor activating mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 , encoding Gαq and Gα11, respectively. Constant activity of these proteins causes deregulation of multiple downstream signaling pathways including PKC, MAPK and YAP1/TAZ. While the importance of YAP1 signaling for the proliferation of uveal melanoma has recently been demonstrated, much less is known about the paralog of YAP1 transcriptional coactivator, named TAZ; however, similar to YAP1, TAZ is expected to be a therapeutic target in uveal melanoma. We performed a small-scale drug screen to discover a compound synergistically inhibiting uveal melanoma proliferation/survival in combination with YAP1/TAZ inhibition. We found that the combination of genetic depletion of YAP1/TAZ together with Mcl-1 inhibition demonstrates a synergistic inhibitory effect on the viability of uveal melanoma cell lines. Similarly, indirect attenuation of the YAP1/TAZ signaling pathway with an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, that is, the geranyl-geranyl transferase inhibitor GGTI-298, synergizes with Mcl-1 inhibition. This combination could be potentially used as a treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma.
{"title":"Combined Mcl-1 and YAP1/TAZ inhibition for treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.","authors":"Kseniya A Glinkina, Amina F A S Teunisse, Maria Chiara Gelmi, Jelle de Vries, Martine J Jager, Aart G Jochemsen","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000911","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular tumor in adults, representing approximately 5% of all melanoma cases. Up to 50% of uveal melanoma patients develop metastases that are resistant to most of the commonly used antineoplastic treatments. Virtually all uveal melanoma tumors harbor activating mutations in GNAQ or GNA11 , encoding Gαq and Gα11, respectively. Constant activity of these proteins causes deregulation of multiple downstream signaling pathways including PKC, MAPK and YAP1/TAZ. While the importance of YAP1 signaling for the proliferation of uveal melanoma has recently been demonstrated, much less is known about the paralog of YAP1 transcriptional coactivator, named TAZ; however, similar to YAP1, TAZ is expected to be a therapeutic target in uveal melanoma. We performed a small-scale drug screen to discover a compound synergistically inhibiting uveal melanoma proliferation/survival in combination with YAP1/TAZ inhibition. We found that the combination of genetic depletion of YAP1/TAZ together with Mcl-1 inhibition demonstrates a synergistic inhibitory effect on the viability of uveal melanoma cell lines. Similarly, indirect attenuation of the YAP1/TAZ signaling pathway with an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, that is, the geranyl-geranyl transferase inhibitor GGTI-298, synergizes with Mcl-1 inhibition. This combination could be potentially used as a treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/d2/mr-33-345.PMC10470438.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10530739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-08-03DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000891
Kourtney Augustyn, Jocelyn Joseph, Anisha B Patel, Azadeh Razmandi, Amatul Noor Ali, Hussein A Tawbi
For patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma who have BRAF V600 activating mutations, combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is now the standard of care. The combination of encorafenib, a highly selective adenosine triphosphate-competitive BRAF inhibitor, plus binimetinib, a potent, selective, allosteric, non-adenosine triphosphate-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations based on data from the phase III COLUMBUS study (NCT01909453). Clinical data evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations in advanced melanoma indicate a specific profile of adverse events that includes serious retinopathy, skin disorders, and cardiovascular toxicities. Here we provide an overview of the rationale for combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma, long-term safety results from COLUMBUS, and guidance on managing the most common adverse events associated with this combination based on clinical experience. Proactive and appropriate management of adverse events can allow for longer treatment durations and may result in better treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Treatment experience with encorafenib plus binimetinib for BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma: management insights for clinical practice.","authors":"Kourtney Augustyn, Jocelyn Joseph, Anisha B Patel, Azadeh Razmandi, Amatul Noor Ali, Hussein A Tawbi","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000891","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma who have BRAF V600 activating mutations, combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors is now the standard of care. The combination of encorafenib, a highly selective adenosine triphosphate-competitive BRAF inhibitor, plus binimetinib, a potent, selective, allosteric, non-adenosine triphosphate-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations based on data from the phase III COLUMBUS study (NCT01909453). Clinical data evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibitor combinations in advanced melanoma indicate a specific profile of adverse events that includes serious retinopathy, skin disorders, and cardiovascular toxicities. Here we provide an overview of the rationale for combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma, long-term safety results from COLUMBUS, and guidance on managing the most common adverse events associated with this combination based on clinical experience. Proactive and appropriate management of adverse events can allow for longer treatment durations and may result in better treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/03/mr-33-406.PMC10470431.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10233973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-06-21DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000906
Laura Cristina Gironi, Elia Esposto, Francesca Zottarelli, Roberto Giorgione, Pamela Farinelli, Elisa Zavattaro, Edoardo Cammarata, Nunzia Di Cristo, Paola Ogliara, Lara Camillo, Mara Giordano, Simona Mellone, Barbara Pasini, Alessandro Ambrosi, Paola Savoia
CDKN2A pathogenic variants are well known to be associated with cutaneous melanoma and noncutaneous tumors (NCTs). Herein, we investigated the temporal correlation between the first cutaneous melanoma and NCT both in CDKN2A mutation carriers (MUT) and in wild-type melanoma patients, a poorly explored issue to date. Two hundred forty-five cutaneous melanoma patients were genotyped for the CDKN2A gene and divided into 51 MUT and 189 wild-type; the remaining five variant carriers were excluded from the analyses. MUT developed a significantly higher number of cutaneous melanoma than wild-type, while 13.7% in both genotyped groups received a diagnosis of at least one malignant NCT, without statistically significant differences. The onset of the first cutaneous melanoma preceded that of the first malignant or benign NCT in both MUT and wild-type patients by an average of 4.5 and 3.02 years, respectively. Considering only malignant tumors, the diagnosis of melanoma preceded that of the first NCT on an average of 8 and 4.34 years, in MUT and wild-type patients respectively. We emphasize the relevance to adopt a global vision for the primary and secondary surveillance of patients affected by cutaneous melanoma, not only limited to high-risk for multiple primary skin cancers but also to NCT that may develop several years after the diagnosis of the first cutaneous melanoma.
{"title":"Temporal correlation between the first melanoma and the first noncutaneous tumor in CKDN2A genotyped patients.","authors":"Laura Cristina Gironi, Elia Esposto, Francesca Zottarelli, Roberto Giorgione, Pamela Farinelli, Elisa Zavattaro, Edoardo Cammarata, Nunzia Di Cristo, Paola Ogliara, Lara Camillo, Mara Giordano, Simona Mellone, Barbara Pasini, Alessandro Ambrosi, Paola Savoia","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000906","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CDKN2A pathogenic variants are well known to be associated with cutaneous melanoma and noncutaneous tumors (NCTs). Herein, we investigated the temporal correlation between the first cutaneous melanoma and NCT both in CDKN2A mutation carriers (MUT) and in wild-type melanoma patients, a poorly explored issue to date. Two hundred forty-five cutaneous melanoma patients were genotyped for the CDKN2A gene and divided into 51 MUT and 189 wild-type; the remaining five variant carriers were excluded from the analyses. MUT developed a significantly higher number of cutaneous melanoma than wild-type, while 13.7% in both genotyped groups received a diagnosis of at least one malignant NCT, without statistically significant differences. The onset of the first cutaneous melanoma preceded that of the first malignant or benign NCT in both MUT and wild-type patients by an average of 4.5 and 3.02 years, respectively. Considering only malignant tumors, the diagnosis of melanoma preceded that of the first NCT on an average of 8 and 4.34 years, in MUT and wild-type patients respectively. We emphasize the relevance to adopt a global vision for the primary and secondary surveillance of patients affected by cutaneous melanoma, not only limited to high-risk for multiple primary skin cancers but also to NCT that may develop several years after the diagnosis of the first cutaneous melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10177937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01Epub Date: 2023-03-28DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000888
José L Manzano, Juan Martin-Liberal, Luis A Fernández-Morales, Gretel Benítez, Javier Medina Martínez, María Quindós, Almudena García-Castaño, Ovidio Fernández, Rocío V Simo, Margarita Majem, Lorena Bellido, Pablo Ayala de Miguel, Begoña Campos, Enrique Espinosa, José A Macías Cerrolaza, Irene Gil-Arnaiz, David Lorente, Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure, Victor N Perez, Rafael López Castro, María G Gramaje, Teresa Puértolas, Juan F Rodriguez Moreno, Laia Espasa Font, Guillermo Belaustegui Ferrández, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes
BRAF and MEK inhibitor, dabrafenib plus trametinib, adjuvant therapy is effective for high-risk resected melanoma patients with BRAF - V600 mutations. However, real-world evidence is limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility of this therapy in routine clinical practice. DESCRIBE-AD, a retrospective observational study, collected real-world data from 25 hospitals in Spain. Histologically confirmed and resected BRAF -mutated melanoma patients aged ≥18 years who were previously treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib adjuvant therapy, were included. The primary objectives were treatment discontinuation rate and time to discontinuation. The secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. From October 2020 to March 2021, 65 patients were included. Dabrafenib and trametinib discontinuation rate due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade was 9%. Other reasons for discontinuation included patients' decisions (6%), physician decisions (6%), unrelated adverse events (3%), disease progression (5%), and others (5%). The median time to treatment discontinuation was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-11]. G3-4 TRAEs occurred in 21.5% of patients, the most common being pyrexia (3%), asthenia (3%), and diarrhoea (3%). Unscheduled hospitalisations and clinical tests occurred in 6 and 22% of patients, respectively. After 20-month median follow-up (95% CI, 18-22), 9% of patients had exitus due to disease progression, with a 12-month relapse-free survival and overall survival rates of 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib adjuvant therapy proved effective for melanoma patients in a real-world setting, with a manageable toxicity profile. Toxicity frequencies were low leading to low incidence of unscheduled medical visits, tests, and treatment discontinuations.
{"title":"Adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for patients with resected BRAF -mutated melanoma: DESCRIBE-AD real-world retrospective observational study.","authors":"José L Manzano, Juan Martin-Liberal, Luis A Fernández-Morales, Gretel Benítez, Javier Medina Martínez, María Quindós, Almudena García-Castaño, Ovidio Fernández, Rocío V Simo, Margarita Majem, Lorena Bellido, Pablo Ayala de Miguel, Begoña Campos, Enrique Espinosa, José A Macías Cerrolaza, Irene Gil-Arnaiz, David Lorente, Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure, Victor N Perez, Rafael López Castro, María G Gramaje, Teresa Puértolas, Juan F Rodriguez Moreno, Laia Espasa Font, Guillermo Belaustegui Ferrández, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000888","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000000888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BRAF and MEK inhibitor, dabrafenib plus trametinib, adjuvant therapy is effective for high-risk resected melanoma patients with BRAF - V600 mutations. However, real-world evidence is limited. We aimed to determine the feasibility of this therapy in routine clinical practice. DESCRIBE-AD, a retrospective observational study, collected real-world data from 25 hospitals in Spain. Histologically confirmed and resected BRAF -mutated melanoma patients aged ≥18 years who were previously treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib adjuvant therapy, were included. The primary objectives were treatment discontinuation rate and time to discontinuation. The secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. From October 2020 to March 2021, 65 patients were included. Dabrafenib and trametinib discontinuation rate due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade was 9%. Other reasons for discontinuation included patients' decisions (6%), physician decisions (6%), unrelated adverse events (3%), disease progression (5%), and others (5%). The median time to treatment discontinuation was 9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-11]. G3-4 TRAEs occurred in 21.5% of patients, the most common being pyrexia (3%), asthenia (3%), and diarrhoea (3%). Unscheduled hospitalisations and clinical tests occurred in 6 and 22% of patients, respectively. After 20-month median follow-up (95% CI, 18-22), 9% of patients had exitus due to disease progression, with a 12-month relapse-free survival and overall survival rates of 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Dabrafenib and trametinib adjuvant therapy proved effective for melanoma patients in a real-world setting, with a manageable toxicity profile. Toxicity frequencies were low leading to low incidence of unscheduled medical visits, tests, and treatment discontinuations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/11/mr-33-388.PMC10470432.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10173470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}