Minerva cardiology and angiology最新文献

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1-4% of all acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Since the first description in 1931, our understanding of the disease has evolved; however, its pathophysiology and management are still a matter of debate. SCAD typically occurs in a middle-aged woman with no or few traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology depending on the primary event: an intimal tear in the "inside-out" hypothesis and a spontaneous hemorrhage from the vasa vasorum in the "outside-in" hypothesis. Etiology appears to be multifactorial: different predisposing and precipitating factors have been identified. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SCAD. Current recommendations on the treatment of SCAD patients are based on expert opinions: a conservative strategy is preferred in hemodynamically stable SCAD patients, while urgent revascularization should be considered in hemodynamically unstable patients. Eleven cases of SCAD in COVID-19 patients have already been described: although the exact pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear, COVID-19-related SCAD is considered a combination of significant systemic inflammatory response and localized vascular inflammation. We present a literature review of SCAD, and we report an unpublished case of SCAD in a COVID-19 patient.

Introduction: TAVI-related complications, such as conduction disturbances, vascular complications or death may be related to increased inflammatory response. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of the systemic glucocorticoid therapy regarding the adverse events after TAVI deployment.

Evidence acquisition: We conducted a systemic search of PubMed, a reference list of relevant articles, and Medline. The main efficacy outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiac and non-cardiac death, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), new left bundle branch block (LBBB), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI). Safety endpoints were major vascular complications, major bleeding events, and cardiac tamponade.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 7 studies including data from 3439 patients with a median follow-up was 30 days. Systemic glucocorticoid compared to the control group were associated with an increased risk of non-cardiac death (Relative Risk [RR] 5.90 95%CI [2.95; 11.80], P<0.001) major vascular complications (RR 1.78, 95%CI [1.22 - 2.61], P=0.003) and cardiac tamponade (RR 3.42, 95%CI [1.69 - 6.92], P<0.001). However, there were no differences in all-cause death, cardiac death, new LBBB, stroke, MI, or major bleeding events (all P values >0.05).

Conclusions: Glucocorticoid therapy before the TAVI procedure was associated with an increase in non-cardiac death, major vascular events and cardiac tamponade. There were no differences in the risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, PPM or LBBB, stroke, or MI.

Concomitant presence of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention is a frequent occurrence. The choice of optimal antithrombotic therapy, in this context, is still challenging. To offer the best protection both in terms of stroke and stent thrombosis, triple therapy with oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy would be required. Several drug combinations have been tested in recent years, including direct oral anticoagulants, with the aim of balancing ischemic and bleeding risk. Both pharmacokinetic aspects of the molecules and patient's characteristics should be analyzed in choosing oral anticoagulation. Then, as suggested by guidelines, triple therapy should start with a seven-day duration and the aim to prolong to thirty days in high thrombotic risk patients. Dual therapy should follow to reach twelve months after coronary intervention. Even not fully discussed by the guidelines, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk it should also be considered: 1) integrated assessment of coronary artery disease and procedural complexity of coronary intervention; 2) appropriateness to maintain the anticoagulant drug dosage indicated in technical data sheet; the lack of data on the suspension of antiplatelet drugs one year after percutaneous intervention; 3) the possibility of combination therapy with ticagrelor; and 4) the need to treat the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during acute coronary syndrome. With data provided clinician should pursue a therapy as personalized as possible, both in terms of drug choice and treatment duration, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk.

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are integral in treating patients with heart failure, regardless of the existence of diabetes mellitus. In light of their benefits on the heart muscle, the question of their effect on acute coronary syndrome is raised, and a hypothesis as to whether they can be implemented in its treatment is proposed. The aim of the article was to indicate the potential of using SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI).

Evidence acquisition: A PubMed search for articles published between October 2017 and May 2022 was conducted using the following keywords: "SGLT2 inhibitors," "Acute Coronary Syndrome," "Treatment," "Prognosis." Reference lists of identified articles were searched for further articles.

Evidence synthesis: Reports from clinical trials and animal studies thus far investigating mechanistic pathways of SGLT2 inhibitors' effect in relation to acute myocardial infarction were interplayed to extract relevant findings and analyze the safety of this therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitors indicate beneficial effects in acute cardiovascular incident by various mechanisms, and early initiation of therapy may improve outcomes for AMI survivors.

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation is routinely used to obtain rhythm control. Evidence suggest that catheter ablation should be done during uninterrupted oral anticoagulation.

Methods: Italian Registry in the setting of atrial fibrillation ablation with rivaroxaban (IRIS) is an Italian multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study which enrolled 250 consecutive atrial fibrillation patients eligible for catheter ablation on rivaroxaban. The decision for rivaroxaban management was left to the physician: uninterrupted or shortly interrupted prior to Catheter ablation. Patients received a follow-up visit at 1 month and 12 months after the procedure.

Results: The primary outcome, represented by all-cause death and systemic embolism at 1 month and 12 months was characterized by one transient ischemic attack and one myocardial infarction in the first 30 days. Both events happened in patients with shortly interrupted strategy (P=0.147), and both in patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation (P=0.737). In the primary safety outcome represented by major bleeding we did not register any event in the 12-month follow-up. The secondary outcome constituted by minor bleeding registered 1 event, after the first 30 days since CA.

Conclusions: IRIS is the biggest real-life data registry regarding CA ablation on rivaroxaban in Italian setting, proving the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between DII and sarcopenia in individuals with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999-2004. Adults aged ≥50 years diagnosed with IHD, having complete 24-hour dietary recall data, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-measured muscle mass were eligible for inclusion. Association between DII and sarcopenia, defined by reduced appendicular skeletal muscle mass, was determined by the logistic regression analyses.

Results: Data of 1088 individuals were analyzed, with the mean age of 68.1±0.5 years. Significantly higher DII was observed in the sarcopenic group compared to the non-sarcopenic group (0.24 vs. -0.17, P=0.020). After adjusting for relevant confounders in the multivariable analysis, each unit increase in DII was significantly associated with higher odds of sarcopenia (adjusted odd ratio [aOR]=1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.14, P value = 0.040). In stratified analyses, among patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m², both DII tertile 2 and tertile 3 were significantly associated with greater odds of sarcopenia (tertile 2 vs. tertile 1: aOR=2.85, 95% CI: 1.56-5.23, P=0.001; tertile 3 vs. tertile 1: aOR=3.11, 95% CI: 1.53-6.31, P=0.002), whereas no significant associations was observed among patients with a BMI<30 kg/m².

Conclusions: This study has established a significant independent association between a higher DII and an increased risk of sarcopenia in US adults with IHD regardless of type of IHD. BMI appears as a moderating factor in this association.