MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY最新文献

Objective: This retrospective study compares two techniques of fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures: nail fixation versus plate fixation. We compared titanium elastic nail fixation with plate fixation in patients with uncomplicated midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods: In total, 84 patients were included in our study: 35 in the nail fixation group and 49 in the plate fixation group. We compared the 12-month postoperative shoulder function and scar assessment. Primary outcome was measured by the DASH score and POSAS score. Secondary outcome was measured by Constant score, surgery complications, implant removal, hospitalization days, and size and quality of the scar.

Results: Here was no significant difference in DASH and Constant scores between the two groups. However, the nail group leads in the POSAS (12 (12 - 12) 25 (17 - 30) p < 0.001) and in all scar parameters (size, scar influence). There were no significant differences in the complications despite implant removal where more removals were noted in the nail group (16 (44.4%) 4 (8.3%) p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Fixation of uncomplicated midshaft clavicle fractures with nail provides better cosmetic results and scar quality than fixation with plate, and presents no significant differences in functional ability or complications.

Purpose: The close proximity of the radial nerve to the humerus poses a risk during upper arm surgery. Although the general course of the radial nerve is well-known, its exact position in relation to anatomical reference points remains poorly investigated. This study aimed to develop a standardized protocol for the sonographic and clinical identification of the radial nerve in the upper arm. The ultimate goal is to assist surgeons in avoiding iatrogenic radial nerve palsy.

Methods: A total of 76 measurements were performed in 38 volunteers (both sides). Ultrasound measurements were performed using a linear transducer (10 MHz) to identify the radial nerve at two key points: RD (where the radial nerve crosses the dorsal surface of the humerus) and RL (where the radial nerve crosses the lateral aspect of the humerus). Distances from specific reference points (acromion, lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, olecranon fossa) to RD and RL were measured, and the angle between the course of the nerve and the humeral axis was recorded. Humeral length was defined as the distance between the posterodorsal corner of the acromion and the lateral epicondyle.

Results: The distance from the lateral epicondyle to RD was on average 15.5 cm ± 1.3, corresponding to 50% of the humeral length. The distance from the lateral epicondyle to RL was on average 6.7 cm ± 0.8, corresponding to 21% of the humeral length. The course of the nerve between RD and RL showed an average angulation of 37° to the anatomical axis of the humerus. Gender, BMI, dominant hand, and arm thickness did not correlate with the distances to RD or RL. Measurements were consistent between the left and right side.

Conclusion: The radial nerve can typically be identified by employing a 1/2 and 1/5 ratio on the dorsal and lateral aspects of the humerus. Due to slight variations in individual anatomy, the utilization of ultrasound-assisted visualization presents a valuable and straightforward approach to mitigate the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy during upper arm surgery. This study introduces an easy and fast protocol for this purpose.

Purpose: Quality of care in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between implants was assessed using a novel composite outcome measure, early optimal recovery (EOR), to indicate ideal clinical outcomes and minimal healthcare resource utilization.

Methods: Patients that underwent primary TKA in the study group (ATTUNE® Knee System) or control group (LCS® COMPLETE Knee System) were included in this retrospective, single-center study. EOR was defined as no complications, no readmissions, no extra outpatient visits, ≤ 48 h length of hospital stay (LOS), and restored range of motion and pain perception at 3-month follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare EOR between the study and control groups. Results were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics and are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were collected from a specialized clinic for elective surgeries in the Netherlands, between January 2017 and December 2020.

Results: A total of 566 patients (62.4% female, mean age 67 years) were included for analysis; 185 patients (32.7%) underwent TKA in the study group. Compared to the control group, patients in the study group had greater probability of achieving EOR (65.8% [95% CI: 55.1-75.2] vs. 38.9% [95% CI: 32.8-45.3]; p < 0.001), a LOS ≤ 48 h (77.2% [95% CI: 67.7-84.5] vs. 61.4% [95% CI: 54.7-67.7]; p < 0.05), and ideal pain perception at 3-month follow-up (93.3% [95% CI: 85.7-97.0] vs. 78.2% [95% CI: 71.0-83.9]; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study group was associated with a greater probability of achieving EOR versus the control group, suggesting improved quality of care.

Introduction: Elbow fractures, characterized by their complexity, present significant challenges in post-surgical recovery, with rehabilitation playing a critical role in functional outcomes. This study explores the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions in enhancing joint range of motion (ROM) and reducing complications following surgery for both stable and unstable elbow fractures.

Methods: A cohort of 15 patients, divided based on the stability of their elbow fractures and whether they received post-operative rehabilitation, was analyzed retrospectively. Measurements of ROM-including flexion, extension, pronation, and supination-were taken at three follow-ups: 15-, 30-, and 45-day post surgery. The study assessed the impact of rehabilitation on ROM recovery and the resolution of post-surgical complications.

Results: The findings indicated no statistically significant differences in ROM improvements between patients who underwent rehabilitation and those who did not, across all types of movements measured. However, early rehabilitative care was observed to potentially aid in the mitigation of complications such as joint stiffness, especially in patients with stable fractures.

Conclusion: While rehabilitation did not universally improve ROM recovery in elbow fracture patients, it showed potential in addressing post-operative complications. The study underscores the importance of individualized rehabilitation plans and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines for post-surgical care in elbow fractures.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anterior tibial translation (ATT) in the prone position after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: Fifty subjects (50 knees) undergoing bi-cruciate substituting (BCS)-TKA (Journey II: Smith and Nephew) and age-gender matching 50 subjects (50 knees) undergoing posterior stabilizing (PS)-TKA, were included in this study. Approximately, six months after surgery, and when the subjects had recovered their range of knee motion, following the Mae's method, accurate lateral radiographic imaging of the knee was performed with full knee extension in both supine and prone positions. The maximal protrusion length of the femoral posterior component, posterior to the extension line parallel to the tibial shaft from the edge of the posterior tibial plateau, was measured on lateral radiographs. The difference in length between the prone and supine positions was regarded as the prone-ATT. The posterior protrusion length of the femoral component, and the prone-ATT were compared between BCS and PS-TKA.

Results: The posterior protrusion length of the femoral component in the supine position was BCS-TKA 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, and PS-TKA 8.7 ± 2.3 mm. The length in the prone position was BCS-TKA 4.8 ± 2.3 mm, and PS-TKA 10.7 ± 2.2 m. Posterior protrusion length of the femoral component was significantly larger in both positions in PS-TKA when compared with BCS-TKA. In PS-TKA, posterior protrusion length of the femoral condyle was significantly larger in the prone position when compared to the supine position. No significant difference was observed in BCS-TKA. Prone-ATT was significantly larger in PS-TKA (2 ± 1.9 mm) when compared to BCS-TKA (0.7 ± 2 mm).

Conclusion: Even in a position corresponding to daily movement such as the prone position, ATT was significantly larger in PS-TKA, when compared to BCS-TKA.

This systematic review compares Kirschner wires versus a single cannulated screw for the treatment of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. The purpose of this review is to review the current literature on fixation of lateral condyle fractures of the humerus, and to ascertain whether there is a difference in clinical outcomes of these fractures when fixated with K-wires vs screws. This systematic review of the literature comparing surgical management of paediatric (0-17 years of age) lateral condyle fractures with K-wire versus screw fixation was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic searches of three databases from inception to March 2022 yielded 17 studies which satisfied inclusion criteria, comprising 1,272 patients with a median age of 8.5 years. Eight hundred and fifty-five (67.2%) patients underwent K-wire fixation and 417 (32.8%) underwent screw fixation. Results were divided into comparative and single-arm studies. The median follow-up time was 23.3 months (range 3 months-22 years). A lateral prominence was observed in 114 (13.3%) patients with K-wires and 41 (9.8%) patients with a cannulated screw. An infection developed in 52 (6.1%) patients with K-wires, while only five (1.2%) patients with a screw developed an infection. A carrying angle deformity occurred in 61 (7.1%) patients with K-wires and seven (1.7%) patients with a screw. K-wires and cannulated screws are effective and safe methods of fixation for lateral humeral condyle fractures in children. K-wire fixation may have a greater incidence of infection but allows for safe non-operative removal and versatility with fractures of greater comminution, while screw fixation necessitates a second operation for removal following union.Level of Evidence III Systematic review.

Purpose: The Oberlin II double fascicular nerve transfer has been evaluated extensively for objective outcomes for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries (BPI). However, there is limited information available on the recovery pattern of supination and patient-reported activity in the long-term. Our study aimed to assess the functional results with a minimum of five years of follow-up.

Methods: We evaluated patients with a minimum of five years after the Oberlin II procedure for post-traumatic BPI. They were evaluated using MRC grading, range of active movements, QuickDASH score and activity to check elbow flexion and forearm supination independent of finger and wrist flexion.

Results: 18 out of 26 patients responded with a mean follow-up of 79.4 months (range: 61-98). 16 (88.9%) (p < 0.000) patients recovered to achieve active elbow flexion and forearm supination of either MRC grade 3 power or more. The average range of active elbow flexion was 113.9^° (range: 0-140^°) and active supination was 67.8^° (0-90^°). Patients who achieved grade 3 flexion or higher were found to regain supination after a delay. The recovery continues even after two years of surgery. The mean QuickDASH score was 21.8 (range: 2.3-63.6). There's a significant inverse correlation between QuickDASH with both flexion and supination (p < .001 and < 0.05). 15 patients (83.3%) could demonstrate a dissociation of elbow and forearm movements from digital and wrist movements.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated reliable functional results with independent elbow flexion, forearm supination and acceptable patient-reported outcomes for Oberlin II procedure in BPI.

Purpose: To assess whether 5 mL would not be less effective than 10 mL when performing a suprascapular nerve block, regarding shoulder function and quality of life in primary adhesive capsulitis.

Methods: This is a pilot study of a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted at a single center. Patients with AC characterized by constant pain and restricted movements in anterior elevation, 0°/90° external rotation, and internal rotation were selected. Two groups were randomly selected. In group I, a dose of 10 mL of bupivacaine was applied, while in group II, only 5 mL, in four weekly blocks. Sealed and sequentially numbered envelopes were used. The SF-36 and DASH questionnaires were applied in five moments. The t-Student test was used to compare the means, with a probability of rejecting null hypothesis of 5%.

Results: There were 17 participants with primary AC, seven in group I and 10 in group II. The average age was 54.30 and 50.43 years in the 5 mL and 10 mL groups, respectively. There were no differences when the means were compared by DASH: T0 (p = 0.074); T2 (p = 0.285); T4 (p = 0.333); T8 (p = 0.392), and T12 (p = 0.453). As for the SF-36, there were sparse differences in T2 in the domains of vitality (p = 0.006) and social aspects (p = 0.036) in favor of group I, and in the general health status domain in T8, in favor of group II (p = 0.033).

Conclusion: The volume of 5 mL is not less effective than 10 mL when performing SSNB in the treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis.

Purpose SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus responsible for COVID-19 pandemic. Some authors described the set of persistent symptoms COVID-related as "Long-COVID Syndrome." Several cases of post-COVID-19 osteonecrosis (ON) are described. Our primary aim was to study the hypothetical correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ON; our secondary aim was to understand if ON can be considered part of Long-COVID. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviewers and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Because COVID-19 is a recently described disease, we included all levels of evidence studies. We excluded studies lacking specification regarding the use of corticosteroids (CCS) and studies not related to COVID-19. The variables extracted were age, sex, risk factors, affected joints, signs and symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray features, histology, treatment of COVID-19, dose and duration of treatment with CCS, treatment of ON, follow-up, and treatment outcome. Results A total of 13 studies were included, involving 95 patients and 159 joints. Time between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the onset of symptoms related to ON was 16 weeks on average. Time between the onset of symptoms and the MRI was 6 weeks. An average of 926.4 mg of prednisolone equivalent per patient were administered. On average, CCS were administered for 20.6 days. Conclusions Patients with a history of COVID-19 infection developed osteonecrosis prematurely and with a lower dose of CCS than usually reported in the literature. Symptoms of osteonecrosis occur within the interval of the period described as Long-COVID. Surgeons should not underestimate the persistence of arthralgia when a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and use of CCS is reported.