Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical最新文献

Background: Ofatumumab is approved for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Examining tolerability will enable understanding of its risk-benefit profile.

Objective: Report the tolerability profile of ofatumumab in RMS during treatment of up to 4 years and the effect of pre-medication.

Methods: Cumulative data from the overall safety population included patients taking continuous ofatumumab or being newly switched from teriflunomide. Injection-related reactions (IRRs) by incidence and severity, and post-marketing surveillance data, with an exposure of 18,530 patient-years, were analyzed.

Results: Systemic IRRs affected 24.7% of patients (487/1969) in the overall safety population; most (99.2% [483/487]) were mild (333/487) to moderate (150/487) in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events severity; most systemic IRRs occurred after first injection. Local-site IRRs affected 11.8% (233/1969) and most (99.6% [232/233]) were mild/moderate. Incidence and severity of systemic and localized IRRs were similar between continuous and newly switched patients across repeated injections. Systemic IRR incidence and severity were not substantially affected by steroidal or non-steroidal pre-medication. Post-marketing surveillance identified no new tolerability issues.

Conclusion: Ofatumumab is well tolerated, displays a consistent safety profile during continuous use or after switching from teriflunomide and does not require pre-medication. This enables home management of RMS with a high-efficacy treatment.

Background: Adverse childhood experiences are demonstrated risk factors for depression, a common co-morbidity of multiple sclerosis, but are understudied among people with multiple sclerosis.

Objective: Estimate the association between adverse childhood experiences and depression among 1,990 adults with multiple sclerosis.

Methods: Participants were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California from two studies between 2006 and 2021 and were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis by a neurologist. Adverse childhood experiences were assessed using two instruments, including the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Participants self-reported ever experiencing a major depressive episode. Meta-analysis random effects models and logistic regression were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and a history of depression across study samples. Adverse childhood experiences were expressed as any/none, individual events, and counts. Models adjusted for sex, birth year, race, and ethnicity.

Results: Exposure to any adverse childhood experiences increased the odds of depression in people with multiple sclerosis (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.21-2.42). Several individual adverse childhood experiences were also strongly associated with depression, including "significant abuse or neglect" (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 2.11-3.68).

Conclusion: Findings suggest that adverse childhood experiences are associated with depression among people with multiple sclerosis. Screening for depression should be done regularly, especially among people with multiple sclerosis with a history of adverse childhood experiences.

Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate long-term treatment persistence and safety of natalizumab in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. The secondary objectives were to assess patient characteristics, use of natalizumab-related safety protocol, and treatment persistence in patients with different anti-John Cunningham virus antibody statuses (John Cunningham virus status).

Materials & methods: All adult multiple sclerosis patients in the Finnish multiple sclerosis register who started natalizumab between 1/2006 and 12/2018 were included in this study and followed retrospectively until treatment discontinuation or end of follow-up (12/2019).

Results: In total, 850 patients were included. Median duration of natalizumab treatment was 7.8 years in John Cunningham virus negative (n = 229) and 2.1 years in John Cunningham virus positive patients (n = 115; p < 0.001). The most common cause for treatment discontinuation was John Cunningham virus positivity. After natalizumab discontinuation, patients who had a washout duration of less than 6 weeks had fewer relapses during the first 6 months (p = 0.012) and 12 months (p = 0.005) compared with patients who had a washout duration of over 6 weeks. During the median follow-up of 3.6 years, 76% of patients remained stable or improved on their Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Conclusions: Treatment persistence was very high among John Cunningham virus negative patients. The study supports long-term effectiveness of natalizumab and a washout duration of less than 6 weeks after discontinuation.

Background: Trials of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) often include patients with minimal disability. Patient-reported outcome instruments used in these trials have often not captured physical and psychological treatment effects concomitant with observed clinical benefits.

Objective: To examine whether the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) captures changes in the impact of MS in a sample of patients enrolled in the Phase 3 ASCLEPIOS studies (ofatumumab vs. teriflunomide).

Methods: Measurement properties (i.e. item fit, reliability, and targeting) of the MSIS-29 were analyzed using Rasch measurement theory (RMT) in data from two phase 3 ofatumumab clinical trials including patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS (N = 1882). Targeting of the MSIS-29 items to the patient population was explored within groups categorized by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores.

Results: Under RMT analyses, both the Physical and Psychological Impact scales of the MSIS-29 were not appropriately targeted to the overall sample of patients. In particular, 49% and 30% of patients with an EDSS score ≤ 2.5 had fewer physical and psychological impacts, respectively, than would typically be captured by these MSIS-29 items compared to patients with EDSS scores of ≥ 3.

Conclusion: The MSIS-29 is commonly used to evaluate the patient-reported physical and psychological impact of MS. However, it may be limited in evaluating changes associated with DMTs in patients with minimal disability.

Background: Although upper respiratory infections (URIs) are linked to multiple sclerosis (MS) attacks, SARS-COV2 has not been compared to URIs for attack rates.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the attack rate and the results of neuroimaging in MS patients with URIs caused by COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 infections (NC-URI).

Methods: From May 2020 to April 2021, we followed 362 patients with relapsing-remitting MS in a prospective cohort design. Patients were monitored regularly every 12 weeks; an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed at enrollment and every time a relapse occurred. Poisson analysis was used to determine exacerbation rate ratios (RR) and the MRI parameters were tested using chi-square analysis.

Results: 347 patients with an average age of 38 and a female ratio of 86% were included. A RR of 2.24 (p < 0.001) was observed for exacerbations during the at-risk period (ARP). Attacks related to COVID-19 (RR = 2.13, p = 0.001) and NC-URIs (RR = 2.39, p < 0.001) were comparable regarding the increased risk of exacerbation (p = 0.62). Exacerbations within or outside the ARP did not significantly alter the number of baseline GAD-enhancing lesions (p > 0.05 for both).

Conclusion: COVID-19 has been shown to increase the risk of MS exacerbations, like other viral URIs.

Introduction: Gait impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), but difficult to evaluate in clinical practice. In this proof-of-concept observational study, we compared walking ability recorded by Google Maps Timeline to conventional clinical measures in people with MS.

Methods: We used open-access Google Maps Timeline to record the total number of days with walking activity, walking distance, walking time, and walking speed. Each Google Maps Timeline variable was included in a different stepwise linear regression model including all conventional clinical variables.

Results: We included nine people with MS (age 43.1 ± 6.6 years; females 55.6%; disease duration 12.7 ± 3.1 years; median Expanded Disability Status Scale 3.0 (range 1.0-5.5)). Higher percentage of days with recorded walking was associated with lower Fatigue Severity Scale (p = 0.01), and higher MS Walking Scale (p = 0.04). Longer average daily walking distance was associated with shorter Timed-25 Foot Walking Test (p = 0.02), lower Expanded Disability Status Scale (p = 0.01), and higher Euro-Quality of Life (p = 0.04). Longer average daily walking time was associated with shorter Timed-25 Foot Walking Test (p = 0.03). Higher walking speed was associated with lower Fatigue Severity Scale (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Google Maps Timeline parameters provide actual estimates of daily walking activities in MS.

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) comparative effectiveness research needs to go beyond average treatment effects (ATEs) and post-host subgroup analyses.

Objective: This retrospective study assessed overall and patient-specific effects of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) versus teriflunomide (TERI) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.

Methods: A novel precision medicine (PM) scoring approach leverages advanced machine learning methods and adjusts for imbalances in baseline characteristics between patients receiving different treatments. Using the German NeuroTransData registry, we implemented and internally validated different scoring systems to distinguish patient-specific effects of DMF relative to TERI based on annualized relapse rates, time to first relapse, and time to confirmed disease progression.

Results: Among 2791 patients, there was superior ATE of DMF versus TERI for the two relapse-related endpoints (p = 0.037 and 0.018). Low to moderate signals of treatment effect heterogeneity were detected according to individualized scores. A MS patient subgroup was identified for whom DMF was more effective than TERI (p = 0.013): older (45 versus 38 years), longer MS duration (110 versus 50 months), not newly diagnosed (74% versus 40%), and no prior glatiramer acetate usage (35% versus 5%).

Conclusion: The implemented approach can disentangle prognostic differences from treatment effect heterogeneity and provide unbiased patient-specific profiling of comparative effectiveness based on real-world data.

Background: In high-income countries, four anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used or in the pipeline for relapsing MS: ocrelizumab, ofatumumab (both registered), ublituximab (awaiting registration) and rituximab (off-label). List prices differ significantly between registered and off-label drugs.

Objective: Comparing differences in benefits between anti-CD20 mAbs from a health-economic and societal perspective.

Methods: To reflect lifetime use of DMTs, we used a treatment-sequence model to compare ocrelizumab/ofatumumab and eight other drug classes in terms of health (lifetime relapses, time to Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 6, lifetime quality-adjusted life years) and cost-effectiveness (net health benefit). To become cost-effective compared to ocrelizumab, we modelled the list price of ublituximab and desired effect on EDSS progression of rituximab.

Results: Although drug sequences with ocrelizumab in first- and second-line were more cost-effective than ofatumumab, our probabilistic analysis suggests this outcome was very uncertain. To be more cost-effective than ocrelizumab, ublituximab needs to be about 25% cheaper whilst rituximab needs to equal the effect on disability progression seen with first-line treatments.

Conclusions: Our model showed no clear difference in cost-effectiveness between ocrelizumab and ofatumumab. Hence, prescribing the least costly anti-CD20 mAb can democratise MS care without a loss in health benefits.