Neurology. Clinical practice最新文献

Purpose of review: Increasing awareness and earlier diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) have led to a greater number of patients being cared for longitudinally by neurologists. Although many neurologists are now familiar with the general approach to diagnosis and acute immunosuppression, this review aims to provide neurologists with guidance related to management beyond the acute phase of disease, including long-term immunosuppression, monitoring, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and symptom management.

Recent findings: Observational studies in AE have demonstrated that early diagnosis and treatment is associated with improved neurologic outcomes, particularly in AE with antibodies targeting neuronal cell surface/synaptic proteins. The literature regarding long-term management is evolving. In addition to traditional immunosuppressive approaches, there is emerging use of novel immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) in case series, and several randomized controlled trials are planned. Novel biomarkers of disease activity and methods to measure outcomes and response to treatment are being explored. Furthermore, it is increasingly recognized that many individuals have chronic symptoms affecting quality of life including seizures, cognitive impairment, fatigue, sleep disorders, and mood disorders, and there are emerging data supporting the use of patient centered outcome measures and multidisciplinary symptom-based care.

Summary: This review aims to summarize recent literature and offer a practical approach to long-term management of adult patients with AE through a multidisciplinary approach. We summarize current knowledge on ISTs, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and long-term sequelae. Further research is needed to answer questions regarding optimal IST, biomarker validity, and sequelae of disease.

Background and objectives: The prevalence of Alzheimer dementia in the US Latino population in 2060 is projected to increase 7-fold, the highest among any other major ethnic/racial group. One vital question is how clinicians can tailor their care for Latinos. Given this rapidly growing prevalence, we sought to characterize the experiences and perspectives of Latino caregivers by analyzing interview data from both caregivers and experienced providers that specifically work with Latino populations. In this study, we present 6 themes that emerged along with tailored solutions and recommendations to implement in clinical practice to improve patient care and outcomes.

Methods: This qualitative analysis uses coded interview transcripts from 2 studies, one in Southern California and another in Washington State. The combined dataset included interview transcripts with 51 caregivers and 20 providers. A thematic analysis was performed on the coded interview transcripts to identify themes related to tailoring care for Latino populations.

Results: Six themes emerged from the analysis: (1) multiple caregivers involved within a family-oriented Latino household; (2) need for encouragement in advocating for loved ones in the clinician's office; (3) challenges in reaching and communicating with the Latino population; (4) increasing use of technology by patients and caregivers despite some challenges; (5) stigma associated with mental health issues within the Latino culture; and (6) limited understating of dementia leading to a delay in care in the Latino population.

Discussion: Many Latino households have a strong sense of familism, thus care coordination with multiple caregivers is essential to high-quality care. Improved shared decision-making strategies tailored to a population that may be culturally deferential to authoritative figures can aid caregiver understanding and engagement with the provider. These interactions can often be more authentic when communicating with a member of the care team in Spanish. A cultural stigma of mental illness was also identified; clinicians can work toward normalizing discussion of mental illness and its treatment by openly discussing mental health during annual visits. Through these themes, we demonstrate some of the strengths and weaknesses of the current care delivery model within a sociocultural context to improve patient care and outcomes for Latino families caring for individuals living with dementia.

Background and objectives: Mortality index is the ratio of observed-to-expected mortality. Accurate and thorough documentation of patient comorbidities and conditions is the key determinant of neuroscience expected mortality. In this study, we focused on reviewing neuroscience documentation, as optimizing mortality index provides accurate assessment of the quality of care provided, improves service-line rankings, and affects reimbursement.

Methods: We assembled an interprofessional team of a neurologist and clinical documentation integrity (CDI) specialists to review clinical documentation of all mortalities from the neuroscience service lines at a tertiary academic medical center over 9 months. We identified common documentation opportunities among high acuity neuroscience patients to improve accuracy of expected mortality. Using the mortality risk adjustment method from Vizient Inc., we compared baseline and postreview expected mortality.

Results: We reviewed 70 mortality charts over a 9-month period. Opportunities to improve documentation were present in 60%. Common underreported comorbidities included aspiration pneumonia, shock, encephalopathy, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhagic disorder due to anticoagulation, and nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The number of diagnoses identified per patient that affected mortality increased between the first and last quarter from 4.3 to 7.8 (p < 0.0001). Physician-identified additional diagnoses per patient decreased from 1.0 to 0.3 (p = 0.0037), as CDI specialists had increased capture of neuroscience specific diagnoses throughout the intervention. The average expected mortality significantly increased from baseline 0.33 to 0.42 (p < 0.0001).

Discussion: Collaboration between physicians and CDI specialists optimizes expected mortality by identification of common gaps in documentation specific to neuroscience patients. Neurologist engagement is beneficial in CDI and lays the framework for clinical documentation education for neurology physicians.

Background and objectives: Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience disease-related cognitive impairment, but even after decades of research, still very little is known about the cognitive issues among older adults with MS (EwMS; individuals aged 60+). To date, few studies have attempted to characterize cognitive impairment in this group or compare EwMS with those with other neurodegenerative diseases. Our goal was to address this knowledge gap by comparing EwMS with individuals experiencing cognitive impairment due to probable Alzheimer disease (AD) with biomarker confirmation.

Methods: We conducted an observational study of individuals seen for routine clinical care at the Cleveland Clinic. After excluding for potential confounding factors, 6 groups were assembled based on the results of their clinical workup and neuropsychological examination: cognitively normal, cognitively normal with MS, mild neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD), and major neurocognitive disorder (due to MS or AD). These groups were compared in terms of cognitive test performance, percentage of the group impaired on specific cognitive skills, and rates of cognitive impairment.

Results: The sample comprised 140 individuals (64 EwMS and 76 demographically matched individuals from a memory clinic). Among those with mild neurocognitive disorder, differences between MS and AD were marked. However, in those with major neurocognitive disorder, these differences largely disappeared, except persistent performance differences on a measure of rote verbal memory. EwMS outperformed those with AD on memory tests at each level of cognitive impairment. EwMS also exhibited both subcortical and cortical deficits, rather than solely subcortical deficits.

Discussion: The overall characterization of the cognitive profile of MS may be different than once described, involving both classically cortical and subcortical functions. Clinically, our results suggest that distinguishing between the cognitive effects of MS and AD at more severe levels of cognitive impairment may be less reliable than once thought. Future work to replicate these findings in other samples and deepen the understanding of cognition in older individuals with MS is needed.

Background and objectives: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in approximately 25% of adult population. The prevalence of PFO is high in patients with cryptogenic stroke suggesting paradoxical embolism. PFO closure in carefully selected patients is an effective secondary preventive strategy in these patients. We report predictors of management recommendations by the multidisciplinary Board and their impact on outcomes.

Methods: Brain-Heart Board comprises vascular and interventional neurology and cardiology subspecialties (structural, electrophysiology, and cardiac imaging). Adult patients referred to the Board for consideration of PFO closure between October 2017 to March 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Demographics, comorbid conditions, risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score, event frequencies (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or stroke, intracranial hemorrhage [ICH], post-PFO closure cardiac arrhythmias), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 1 year were compared between the groups (PFO closure vs medical management). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with management recommendation and chi-square tests to test differences in outcomes for patients according to management.

Results: Two hundred seventy patients (229 stroke; 41 TIA) were discussed by the Board for PFO closure. 119 (44.0%) patients were recommended for PFO closure of which 117 (98.3%) had evidence of ischemic infarct on imaging. In univariate analysis, age was similar (50 ± 11.9 vs 52 ± 12.8, p = 0.17), but RoPE score was higher in closure as compared with the medical management group (6 [IQR 5-7] vs 5 [IQR 4-7], p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, TIA as the index event was an independent predictor of Board recommendation against PFO closure (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.19, p < 0.05). Event frequency was low in both cohorts (5.9% vs 4.8%, p > 0.05) and comprised cardiac arrhythmias (6 cases of atrial fibrillation and 1 ICH in closure group; 1 TIA and 1 recurrent stroke in medical management group). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was similar in both cohorts (66.3% vs 70.7%, p > 0.05) at 1 year.

Discussion: Multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board provides a clinical practice model of collaborative care to ensure proper patient selection for PFO closure. TIA as the index event is associated with recommendation of medical management by the multidisciplinary Brain-Heart Board.

Background and objectives: Without brain biopsy, there are limited diagnostic predictors to differentiate primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We examined the utility of clinical, CSF, and quantitative vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VWMRI) variables in predicting PACNS from ICAD.

Methods: In this cross-sectional design, observational study, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients (18 years and older) who presented to our medical center between January 2015 and December 2021 for ischemic stroke due to intracranial vasculopathy. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS, probable PACNS, or ICAD were included. Patients with secondary CNS vasculitis or no VWMRI data were excluded. On VWMRI, for each patient, a total of 20 vessel wall segments were analyzed for percent concentricity, percent irregularity, and concentricity to eccentricity (C/E) ratios. We also collected several clinical and CSF variables. Using logistic regression models, we assessed the diagnostic value of VWMRI, CSF, and clinical variables in predicting PACNS in patients with biopsy-proven disease. We then performed a sensitivity analysis to assess predictors of biopsy-proven and probable PACNS.

Results: Thirty-two patients with ICAD (54.2%) and 27 patients with PACNS (45.8%) were included. Of the patients with PACNS, 21 (77.8%) were not biopsied and considered probable PACNS. Twenty-four patients with ICAD (75%) and 6 biopsy-proven patients with PACNS (22.2%) showed large vessel involvement and were included in the primary analysis. Encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09) and seizure (OR 23.00; 95% CI 1.77-298.45) were significantly associated with PACNS. All patients were included in the sensitivity analysis, in which headache significantly predicted PACNS (OR 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09). In the primary analysis, for every 1 white blood cell/µL increase in CSF, there was a 47% higher odds of PACNS (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.07). On VWMRI, a C/E ratio >1 (OR 115.00; 95% CI 6.11-2165.95), percent concentricity ≥50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71), and percent irregularity <50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71) indicated significantly higher odds of PACNS compared with ICAD.

Discussion: Our results suggest that quantitative VWMRI metrics, CSF pleocytosis, and clinical features of encephalopathy, seizure, and headache significantly predict a diagnosis of probable PACNS when compared with ICAD.

Background and objectives: Cockayne syndrome (CS) is an ultra-rare, autosomal recessive, premature aging disorder characterized by impaired growth, neurodevelopmental delays, neurodegeneration, polyneuropathy, and other multiorgan system complications. The anatomic aspects of CS neurodegeneration have long been known from postmortem examinations and MRI studies, but the clinical features of this neurodegeneration are not well characterized, especially at later stages of the disease.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study in which individuals with CS who survived beyond 18 years were ascertained at 3 centers in the United States, France, and the United Kingdom. Medical records were examined to determine the frequencies and features of the following neurologic complications: neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric decline (8 symptoms), tremors, neuropathy, seizures, and strokes.

Results: Among 18 individuals who met inclusion criteria, all but one (94.4%) experienced at least one symptom of neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric decline, with most individuals experiencing at least half of those symptoms. Most participants experienced tremors and peripheral neuropathy, with a few experiencing seizures and strokes. For individuals with available data, 100.0% were reported to have gait ataxia and neuroimaging showed that 85.7% had generalized cerebral atrophy on MRI while 78.6% had white matter changes.

Discussion: Symptoms of neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric decline are nearly universal in our cohort of adults with CS, suggesting that these individuals are at risk of developing neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric decline, with symptoms related to but not specific to dementia. Considering the prominent role of DNA repair defects in CS disease mechanisms and emerging evidence for increased DNA damage in neurodegenerative disease, impaired genome maintenance may be a shared pathway underlying multiple forms of neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric decline. Components of the DNA damage response mechanism may bear further study as potential therapeutic targets that could alleviate neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric symptoms in CS and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Background and objectives: With recent trials suggesting that endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) alone may be noninferior to combined intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase and EVT and that tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase in treating acute ischemic stroke, we sought to understand current practices around the world for treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (LVO) depending on the center of practice (IVT-capable vs IVT and EVT-capable stroke center).

Methods: The electronic survey launched by the Practice Current section of Neurology: Clinical Practice included 6 clinical and 8 demographic questions. A single-case scenario was presented of a 65-year-old man presenting with right hemiplegia with aphasia with a duration of 1 hour. Imaging showed left M1-MCA occlusion with no early ischemic changes. The respondents were asked about their treatment approach in 2 settings: the patient presented to (1) the IVT-only capable center and (2) the IVT and EVT-capable center. They were also asked about the thrombolytic agent of choice in current and ideal circumstances for these settings.

Results: A total of 203 physicians (42.9% vascular neurologists) from 44 countries completed the survey. Most participants (55.2%) spent ≥50% of their time delivering stroke care. The survey results showed that in current practice, more than 90% of respondents would offer IVT + EVT to patients with LVO stroke presenting to either an EVT-capable (91.1%) or IVT-only-capable center (93.6%). Although nearly 80% currently use alteplase for thrombolysis, around 60% would ideally like to switch to tenecteplase independent of the practice setting. These results were similar between stroke and non-stroke neurologists.

Discussion: Most physicians prefer IVT before EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to large vessel occlusion independent of the practice setting.

Purpose of the review: Intracranial neurostimulation is a well-established treatment of neurologic conditions such as drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and movement disorders, and there is emerging evidence for using deep brain stimulation to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and depression. Nearly all published reports of intracranial neurostimulation have focused on implanting a single device to treat a single condition. The purpose of this review was to educate neurology clinicians on the background literature informing dual treatment of 2 comorbid neuropsychiatric conditions epilepsy and OCD, discuss ethical and logistical challenges to dual neuropsychiatric treatment with a single device, and demonstrate the promise and pitfalls of this approach through discussion of the first-in-human closed-looped responsive neurostimulator (RNS) implanted to treat both DRE (on-label) and OCD (off-label).

Recent findings: We report the first implantation of an intracranial closed-loop neurostimulation device (the RNS system) with the primary goal of treating DRE and a secondary exploratory goal of managing treatment-refractory OCD. The RNS system detects electrophysiologic activity and delivers electrical stimulation through 1 or 2 electrodes implanted into a patient's seizure-onset zones (SOZs). In this case report, we describe a patient with treatment-refractory epilepsy and OCD where the first lead was implanted in the right superior temporal gyrus to target the most active SOZ based on stereotactic EEG (sEEG) recordings and semiology. The second lead was implanted to target the right anterior peri-insular region (a secondary SOZ on sEEG) with the distal-most contacts in the right nucleus accumbens, a putative target for OCD neurostimulation treatment. The RNS system was programmed to detect and record the unique electrophysiologic signature of both the patient's seizures and compulsions and then deliver tailored electrical pulses to disrupt the pathologic circuitry.

Summary: Dual treatment of refractory focal epilepsy and OCD with an intracranial closed-loop neurostimulation device is feasible, safe, and potentially effective. However, there are logistical challenges and ethical considerations to this novel approach to treatment, which require complex care coordination by a large multidisciplinary team.