首页 > 最新文献

Nicotine and Tobacco Research最新文献

英文 中文
Trends in Awareness, Use of, and Beliefs About Electronic Cigarette and Snus Among a Longitudinal Cohort of US Midwest Young Adults. 美国中西部年轻人对电子烟和鼻烟的认知、使用和信念的趋势
Pub Date : 2018-01-05 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx042
Kelvin Choi, Jessica Bestrashniy, Jean Forster

Introduction: Few longitudinal studies have examined how awareness, use of, and beliefs about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and snus change over time. We assessed these trends in a cohort of young adults from the US Midwest.

Methods: Data were from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) Study, collected annually during 2010-2013 when participants were 21-29 years old (n = 2622). Participants were asked if they had heard of and ever used e-cigarettes and snus, and the number of days they used these products in the past 30 days. Beliefs about whether these products are less harmful than cigarettes, less addictive than cigarettes, and could help people quit smoking were assessed. Repeated measures multiple linear and logistic regression models, adjusting for demographics, peer smoking and smoking status, were used to assess trends.

Results: Compared to 2010-2011, participants in 2012-2013 were five times more likely to be aware of e-cigarettes, report ever used them, and report using them in the past 30-days. Increases in e-cigarette use were observed in all smoking status. Participants were also increasingly likely to believe that e-cigarettes are less harmful than combustible cigarettes and could help people quit smoking. There was only a modest increase in awareness of and ever using snus, as well as believing snus is less harmful than combustible cigarettes. These trends did not differ by smoking status.

Conclusions: The increasingly favorable beliefs about e-cigarettes may explain the increasing prevalence of their use particularly among young adults, both among smokers and nonsmokers.

Implications: Awareness and use of e-cigarettes have increased substantially over the past few years, and positive beliefs of e-cigarettes have also become more prevalent among young adults. Meanwhile, little changes in awareness, use of, and beliefs about snus among young adults. Given the potential of these products to have both positive and negative impact on public health depending on who use them and how they are used, strategically communicating the risks associated with e-cigarettes and snus use may help minimize the burden of tobacco use at the population level.

引言:很少有纵向研究调查了对电子烟和鼻烟的认识、使用和信念是如何随时间变化的。我们在美国中西部的一组年轻人中评估了这些趋势。方法:数据来自明尼苏达州青少年社区队列(MACC)研究,该研究于2010-2013年间每年收集一次,参与者年龄为21-29岁(n = 2622)。参与者被问及他们是否听说过或曾经使用过电子烟和鼻烟,以及他们在过去30天内使用这些产品的天数。人们对这些产品是否比香烟危害更小,是否比香烟更不容易上瘾,是否能帮助人们戒烟的看法进行了评估。使用重复测量多元线性和逻辑回归模型,调整了人口统计学、同伴吸烟和吸烟状况,以评估趋势。结果:与2010-2011年相比,2012-2013年的参与者意识到电子烟的可能性增加了五倍,报告曾经使用过电子烟,并报告在过去30天内使用过电子烟。在所有吸烟状态中都观察到电子烟使用的增加。参与者也越来越相信电子烟的危害比可燃香烟小,可以帮助人们戒烟。人们对鼻烟的认识和使用程度只有适度的提高,而且相信鼻烟的危害比可燃香烟小。这些趋势没有因吸烟状况而异。结论:对电子烟越来越有利的看法可能解释了电子烟越来越流行的原因,尤其是在年轻人中,无论是吸烟者还是非吸烟者。影响:在过去几年中,人们对电子烟的认识和使用大大增加,对电子烟的积极看法在年轻人中也变得更加普遍。与此同时,年轻人对鼻烟的认识、使用和信仰几乎没有变化。鉴于这些产品可能对公众健康产生积极和消极影响,这取决于使用者和使用方式,因此战略性地宣传与电子烟和鼻烟使用相关的风险,可能有助于在人口层面上尽量减少烟草使用的负担。
{"title":"Trends in Awareness, Use of, and Beliefs About Electronic Cigarette and Snus Among a Longitudinal Cohort of US Midwest Young Adults.","authors":"Kelvin Choi, Jessica Bestrashniy, Jean Forster","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntx042","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntx042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few longitudinal studies have examined how awareness, use of, and beliefs about electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and snus change over time. We assessed these trends in a cohort of young adults from the US Midwest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the Minnesota Adolescent Community Cohort (MACC) Study, collected annually during 2010-2013 when participants were 21-29 years old (n = 2622). Participants were asked if they had heard of and ever used e-cigarettes and snus, and the number of days they used these products in the past 30 days. Beliefs about whether these products are less harmful than cigarettes, less addictive than cigarettes, and could help people quit smoking were assessed. Repeated measures multiple linear and logistic regression models, adjusting for demographics, peer smoking and smoking status, were used to assess trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2010-2011, participants in 2012-2013 were five times more likely to be aware of e-cigarettes, report ever used them, and report using them in the past 30-days. Increases in e-cigarette use were observed in all smoking status. Participants were also increasingly likely to believe that e-cigarettes are less harmful than combustible cigarettes and could help people quit smoking. There was only a modest increase in awareness of and ever using snus, as well as believing snus is less harmful than combustible cigarettes. These trends did not differ by smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The increasingly favorable beliefs about e-cigarettes may explain the increasing prevalence of their use particularly among young adults, both among smokers and nonsmokers.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Awareness and use of e-cigarettes have increased substantially over the past few years, and positive beliefs of e-cigarettes have also become more prevalent among young adults. Meanwhile, little changes in awareness, use of, and beliefs about snus among young adults. Given the potential of these products to have both positive and negative impact on public health depending on who use them and how they are used, strategically communicating the risks associated with e-cigarettes and snus use may help minimize the burden of tobacco use at the population level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896496/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91382719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Which Behavior Change Techniques May Help Waterpipe Smokers to Quit? An Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Technique. 哪些行为改变技巧可以帮助水烟吸烟者戒烟?使用改进的德尔菲技术的专家共识。
Pub Date : 2018-01-05 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw297
Nancy O'Neill, Omara Dogar, Mohammed Jawad, Ian Kellar, Mona Kanaan, Kamran Siddiqi

Introduction: Waterpipe smoking is addictive and harmful. The determinants of waterpipe smoking may differ from those of cigarette smoking; therefore, behavioral approaches to support quitting may also differ between these two tobacco products. While some evidence exists on effective behavioral change techniques (BCTs) to facilitate cigarette smoking cessation, there is little research on waterpipe smoking cessation.

Methods: Twenty-four experts were selected from the author lists of peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials on waterpipe smoking cessation. They were invited to two rounds of a consensus development exercise using modified Delphi technique. Experts ranked 55 BCTs categorized further into those that promote; "awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting" (14), "preparation and planning to quit" (29), and "relapse prevention and sustaining an ex-smoker identity" (12) on their potential effectiveness. Kendall's W statistics was used to assess agreement.

Results: Fifteen experts responded in round 1 and 14 completed both rounds. A strong consensus was achieved for BCTs that help in "relapse prevention and sustaining ex-smoker identity" (w = 0.7; p < .001) and a moderate for those that promote "awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting" (w = 0.6; p < .001) and "preparation and planning to quit" (w = 0.6; p < .001). Providing information on the consequences of waterpipe smoking and its cessation, assessing readiness and ability to quit, and making people aware of the withdrawal symptoms, were the three highest-ranking BCTs.

Conclusion: Based on expert consensus, an inventory of BCTs ordered for their potential effectiveness can be useful for health professionals offering cessation support to waterpipe smokers.

Implications: Waterpipe smoking is addictive, harmful, and gaining global popularity, particularly among youth. An expert consensus on behavior change techniques, likely to be effective in supporting waterpipe smokers to quit, has practice and research implications. Smoking cessation advisors can use these techniques to counsel waterpipe smokers who wish to quit. Behavioral and public health scientists can also use these to develop and evaluate behavioral support interventions for this client group.

水烟管吸烟会上瘾,而且有害。水烟吸烟的决定因素可能与吸烟的决定因素不同;因此,支持戒烟的行为方法也可能在这两种烟草产品之间有所不同。虽然有一些证据表明有效的行为改变技术(bct)有助于戒烟,但关于水烟戒烟的研究很少。方法:从同行评议的水烟戒烟随机对照试验作者名单中选择24位专家。他们被邀请参加使用改进的德尔菲技术的两轮共识发展活动。专家们对55家BCTs进行了进一步的分类:促进;“意识到水烟的危害和戒烟的好处”(14),“准备和计划戒烟”(29),以及“预防复发和保持戒烟者的身份”(12)。Kendall的W统计量被用来评估一致性。结果:第一轮有15位专家回答,两轮均有14位专家完成。对于bct有助于“预防复发和维持戒烟者身份”,我们达成了强烈的共识(w = 0.7;P < 0.001),促进“认识水烟吸烟的危害和戒烟的好处”者为中度(w = 0.6;P < 0.001)和“准备和计划戒烟”(w = 0.6;P < 0.001)。提供有关水烟和戒烟后果的信息,评估戒烟的准备和能力,以及使人们意识到戒断症状,是排名最高的三个btc。结论:在专家共识的基础上,一份bct的潜在有效性清单可以为卫生专业人员提供戒烟支持。含意:水烟会让人上瘾、有害,而且在全球范围内越来越流行,尤其是在年轻人中。专家一致认为,行为改变技术可能对支持水烟吸烟者戒烟有效,具有实践和研究意义。戒烟顾问可以使用这些技巧来建议那些希望戒烟的水烟吸烟者。行为和公共卫生科学家也可以使用这些数据来开发和评估针对这一客户群体的行为支持干预措施。
{"title":"Which Behavior Change Techniques May Help Waterpipe Smokers to Quit? An Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Technique.","authors":"Nancy O'Neill, Omara Dogar, Mohammed Jawad, Ian Kellar, Mona Kanaan, Kamran Siddiqi","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw297","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntw297","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is addictive and harmful. The determinants of waterpipe smoking may differ from those of cigarette smoking; therefore, behavioral approaches to support quitting may also differ between these two tobacco products. While some evidence exists on effective behavioral change techniques (BCTs) to facilitate cigarette smoking cessation, there is little research on waterpipe smoking cessation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four experts were selected from the author lists of peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials on waterpipe smoking cessation. They were invited to two rounds of a consensus development exercise using modified Delphi technique. Experts ranked 55 BCTs categorized further into those that promote; \"awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting\" (14), \"preparation and planning to quit\" (29), and \"relapse prevention and sustaining an ex-smoker identity\" (12) on their potential effectiveness. Kendall's W statistics was used to assess agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen experts responded in round 1 and 14 completed both rounds. A strong consensus was achieved for BCTs that help in \"relapse prevention and sustaining ex-smoker identity\" (w = 0.7; p < .001) and a moderate for those that promote \"awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting\" (w = 0.6; p < .001) and \"preparation and planning to quit\" (w = 0.6; p < .001). Providing information on the consequences of waterpipe smoking and its cessation, assessing readiness and ability to quit, and making people aware of the withdrawal symptoms, were the three highest-ranking BCTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on expert consensus, an inventory of BCTs ordered for their potential effectiveness can be useful for health professionals offering cessation support to waterpipe smokers.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Waterpipe smoking is addictive, harmful, and gaining global popularity, particularly among youth. An expert consensus on behavior change techniques, likely to be effective in supporting waterpipe smokers to quit, has practice and research implications. Smoking cessation advisors can use these techniques to counsel waterpipe smokers who wish to quit. Behavioral and public health scientists can also use these to develop and evaluate behavioral support interventions for this client group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83235360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Smokeless Tobacco and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 南亚无烟烟草和口腔潜在恶性疾病:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2017-12-13 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw310
Zohaib Khan, Sheraz Khan, Lara Christianson, Sara Rehman, Obinna Ekwunife, Florence Samkange-Zeeb

Implications: More than 250 million South and South East Asians use SLT in some form. As cigarettes prices climb up all over the world, more people could potentially take up SLT, particularly in the absence of epidemiological evidence regarding the harmful effects of these products, and SLT being advocated as a means of tobacco harm reduction. Our findings are thus relevant and timely in highlighting the harmful effects of SLT use, with a potential of influencing tobacco control policies in South Asia and beyond.

影响:超过2.5亿南亚和东南亚人以某种形式使用SLT。随着世界各地卷烟价格的攀升,越来越多的人可能会选择SLT,特别是在没有流行病学证据表明这些产品有害影响的情况下,SLT被提倡作为减少烟草危害的一种手段。因此,我们的研究结果在强调使用SLT的有害影响方面具有相关性和及时性,并有可能影响南亚及其他地区的烟草控制政策。
{"title":"Smokeless Tobacco and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zohaib Khan, Sheraz Khan, Lara Christianson, Sara Rehman, Obinna Ekwunife, Florence Samkange-Zeeb","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw310","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntw310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Implications: </strong>More than 250 million South and South East Asians use SLT in some form. As cigarettes prices climb up all over the world, more people could potentially take up SLT, particularly in the absence of epidemiological evidence regarding the harmful effects of these products, and SLT being advocated as a means of tobacco harm reduction. Our findings are thus relevant and timely in highlighting the harmful effects of SLT use, with a potential of influencing tobacco control policies in South Asia and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"79 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85529097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brief Advice on Smoking Reduction Versus Abrupt Quitting for Smoking Cessation in Chinese Smokers: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial 中国吸烟者减少吸烟与突然戒烟的简要建议:一项随机对照试验
Pub Date : 2017-12-13 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx026
M. Wang, W. Li, Y. Cheung, Oi Bun Christina Lam, Y. Wu, A. Kwong, V. Lai, S. Chan, T. Lam
AimsTo compare the efficacy of brief advice about cut-down-to-quit (CDTQ) with that of brief advice about quit immediately (QI), as delivered by trained volunteers, without the use of pharmacological therapy, to outreach-recruited Chinese smokers in Hong Kong who intend to quit smoking.MethodsSmokers (N = 1077) who enrolled in the Quit and Win Contest 2014 and intended to quit or reduce smoking were randomized in participation sessions to CDTQ (n = 559) and QI (n = 518) groups. Subjects in the CDTQ group received brief advice and a card about smoking reduction. Subjects in the QI group received brief advice and a leaflet about quitting smoking. All received a smoking cessation booklet and corresponding CDTQ or QI brief telephone advice at intervals of 1 week, 1 month, or 2 months. The primary outcomes were self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. The secondary outcomes included abstinence rate as validated by biochemical tests, smoking reduction (≥50% reduction from baseline), and quit attempt (QA). The outcome assessors were blinded as to group assignment.ResultsBy intention to treat, the QI and CDTQ groups showed similar results as regards (i) self-reported PPA (10.6% [95% CI 8.1%-13.6%] vs. 9.1% [95% CI 6.9%-11.8%]), (ii) validated abstinence rate (5.6% [3.8%-7.9%] vs. 5.4% [3.6%-7.6%]), and (iii) QA rate (59.2% [53.5%-64.8%] vs. 54.1% [48.7%-59.3%]) at 6-month. However, the CDTQ group showed a significantly higher reduction rate than the QI group (20.9% [CI 17.6%-24.5%] vs. 14.5% [11.6%-17.8%]). The overall intervention adherence was suboptimal (45.4%), particularly in the CDTQ group (42.3%). Self-efficacy as regards quitting of smoking was similar between the groups at 6 months.ConclusionsBrief advice on CDTQ and QI had similar short-term PPAs. Longer-term follow-up is needed to understand the latent effect of smoking reduction on abstinence.ImplicationsThis is the first randomized controlled trial in ethnic Chinese smokers to evaluate the relative efficacy of brief advice on (a) CDTQ and (b) QI as regards quitting. The two interventions showed similar effects as regards PPA. The findings suggested that brief advice on CDTQ may be as effective as brief advice on QI in smokers recruited in community settings.
目的比较由训练有素的志愿者在不使用药物治疗的情况下,向有意戒烟的香港内地吸烟者提供“减少戒烟”简短建议和“立即戒烟”简短建议的效果。方法将参加2014年戒烟与胜利竞赛并打算戒烟或减少吸烟的吸烟者(N = 1077)随机分为CDTQ组(N = 559)和QI组(N = 518)。CDTQ组的受试者收到了简短的建议和一张关于减少吸烟的卡片。QI组的受试者收到了关于戒烟的简短建议和传单。每隔1周、1个月或2个月,所有人都收到戒烟小册子和相应的CDTQ或QI简短电话咨询。主要结果是在3个月和6个月的随访中自我报告的7天点流行戒断(PPA)。次要结局包括经生化试验验证的戒断率、吸烟减少(较基线减少≥50%)和戒烟尝试(QA)。结果评估者在分组分配方面采用盲法。结果在治疗意向方面,QI组和CDTQ组在(i)自我报告PPA (10.6% [95% CI 8.1%-13.6%]对9.1% [95% CI 6.9%-11.8%]), (ii) 6个月有效戒断率(5.6%[3.8%-7.9%]对5.4%[3.6%-7.6%])和(iii) QA率(59.2%[53.5%-64.8%]对54.1%[48.7%-59.3%])方面显示相似的结果。然而,CDTQ组的降低率明显高于QI组(20.9% [CI 17.6%-24.5%] vs. 14.5% [CI 11.6%-17.8%])。总体干预依从性是次优的(45.4%),特别是在CDTQ组(42.3%)。6个月时,两组在戒烟方面的自我效能感相似。结论简要建议CDTQ与QI具有相似的短期ppa。需要长期随访来了解减少吸烟对戒烟的潜在影响。这是第一个在华裔吸烟者中进行的随机对照试验,以评估关于戒烟的(a) CDTQ和(b) QI的简短建议的相对疗效。两种干预措施在PPA方面显示出相似的效果。研究结果表明,在社区环境中招募的吸烟者中,对CDTQ的简短建议可能与对QI的简短建议一样有效。
{"title":"Brief Advice on Smoking Reduction Versus Abrupt Quitting for Smoking Cessation in Chinese Smokers: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"M. Wang, W. Li, Y. Cheung, Oi Bun Christina Lam, Y. Wu, A. Kwong, V. Lai, S. Chan, T. Lam","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntx026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx026","url":null,"abstract":"Aims\u0000To compare the efficacy of brief advice about cut-down-to-quit (CDTQ) with that of brief advice about quit immediately (QI), as delivered by trained volunteers, without the use of pharmacological therapy, to outreach-recruited Chinese smokers in Hong Kong who intend to quit smoking.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Smokers (N = 1077) who enrolled in the Quit and Win Contest 2014 and intended to quit or reduce smoking were randomized in participation sessions to CDTQ (n = 559) and QI (n = 518) groups. Subjects in the CDTQ group received brief advice and a card about smoking reduction. Subjects in the QI group received brief advice and a leaflet about quitting smoking. All received a smoking cessation booklet and corresponding CDTQ or QI brief telephone advice at intervals of 1 week, 1 month, or 2 months. The primary outcomes were self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. The secondary outcomes included abstinence rate as validated by biochemical tests, smoking reduction (≥50% reduction from baseline), and quit attempt (QA). The outcome assessors were blinded as to group assignment.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000By intention to treat, the QI and CDTQ groups showed similar results as regards (i) self-reported PPA (10.6% [95% CI 8.1%-13.6%] vs. 9.1% [95% CI 6.9%-11.8%]), (ii) validated abstinence rate (5.6% [3.8%-7.9%] vs. 5.4% [3.6%-7.6%]), and (iii) QA rate (59.2% [53.5%-64.8%] vs. 54.1% [48.7%-59.3%]) at 6-month. However, the CDTQ group showed a significantly higher reduction rate than the QI group (20.9% [CI 17.6%-24.5%] vs. 14.5% [11.6%-17.8%]). The overall intervention adherence was suboptimal (45.4%), particularly in the CDTQ group (42.3%). Self-efficacy as regards quitting of smoking was similar between the groups at 6 months.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000Brief advice on CDTQ and QI had similar short-term PPAs. Longer-term follow-up is needed to understand the latent effect of smoking reduction on abstinence.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000This is the first randomized controlled trial in ethnic Chinese smokers to evaluate the relative efficacy of brief advice on (a) CDTQ and (b) QI as regards quitting. The two interventions showed similar effects as regards PPA. The findings suggested that brief advice on CDTQ may be as effective as brief advice on QI in smokers recruited in community settings.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"67–72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85369990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27
E-Cigarette Susceptibility as a Predictor of Youth Initiation of E-Cigarettes 电子烟易感性作为青少年开始使用电子烟的预测因子
Pub Date : 2016-12-29 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw393
K. Bold, Grace Kong, D. Cavallo, D. Camenga, S. Krishnan-Sarin
IntroductionIdentifying youth at risk for future e-cigarette use is critical for informing prevention efforts. Prior research established measures of susceptibility to conventional cigarettes, and this study aimed to examine whether items adapted for e-cigarette susceptibility predicted subsequent e-cigarette use among never e-cigarette users.MethodsLongitudinal school-wide survey data were collected from middle and high school students in Fall 2013 (wave 1) and Spring 2014 (wave 2). Among never e-cigarette users at wave 1 (n = 1720), e-cigarette susceptibility was measured by two items assessing anticipation of experimenting with e-cigarettes in the future and willingness to use an e-cigarette if offered by a best friend. Logistic regression models examined susceptibility as a predictor of e-cigarette initiation and past 30-day use 6 months later at wave 2. Models were clustered by school and controlled for sex, age, race, SES, and other substance use (alcohol, marijuana, and other tobacco).ResultsIn total, 8.9% (n = 153) of youth initiated e-cigarettes and 3.7% (n = 63) reported past 30-day use at wave 2. E-cigarette susceptibility was a significant independent predictor of subsequent initiation (OR = 4.27, 95% CI = 3.12-5.85) and past 30-day e-cigarette use (OR = 5.10, 95%CI = 3.38-7.68) 6 months later. Susceptible youth were more likely to be male, older, and have used alcohol, marijuana, or other tobacco products.ConclusionsThese findings provide initial support for adapting two susceptibility items to identify adolescents at risk for future e-cigarette use. Identifying strategies that are effective for targeting susceptible youth and preventing future e-cigarette use will be critical areas for future research.ImplicationsMore than a quarter of the sample who reported both a willingness to try e-cigarettes if offered by a best friend and anticipation of experimenting with e-cigarettes in the future went on to try e-cigarettes within the academic year, suggesting that targeting this group will be critical for preventing youth e-cigarette initiation. There were notable demographic differences between susceptible and non-susceptible youth, suggesting targeting e-cigarette prevention efforts to male students who have used other substances may be especially important for preventing future e-cigarette use. Research is needed to determine the most effective prevention strategies to reach susceptible youth.
识别未来有使用电子烟风险的青少年对于告知预防工作至关重要。先前的研究建立了对传统香烟易感性的测量方法,本研究旨在研究适合电子烟易感性的项目是否预测了从未吸过电子烟的人随后使用电子烟。方法在2013年秋季(第1波)和2014年春季(第2波)对初高中学生进行了全校范围的纵向调查数据。在第1波(n = 1720)中,从未使用过电子烟的学生通过两个项目来衡量电子烟的易感性:评估未来尝试电子烟的预期,以及如果最好的朋友提供电子烟,他们是否愿意使用电子烟。逻辑回归模型检验了易感性作为电子烟开始使用和6个月后超过30天使用第二波的预测因子。模型按学校聚类,并控制性别、年龄、种族、社会经济地位和其他物质使用(酒精、大麻和其他烟草)。结果总共有8.9% (n = 153)的年轻人开始吸电子烟,3.7% (n = 63)的年轻人报告在第2波使用了30天。电子烟易感性是6个月后开始使用电子烟(OR = 4.27, 95%CI = 3.12-5.85)和过去30天使用电子烟(OR = 5.10, 95%CI = 3.38-7.68)的重要独立预测因子。易受影响的青少年更有可能是男性,年龄较大,并且使用过酒精,大麻或其他烟草制品。结论:这些发现为采用两个易感性项目来识别青少年未来使用电子烟的风险提供了初步支持。确定针对易感青少年和防止未来使用电子烟的有效策略将是未来研究的关键领域。超过四分之一的样本报告说,如果最好的朋友提供电子烟,他们愿意尝试电子烟,并期望在未来尝试电子烟,他们在学年内继续尝试电子烟,这表明针对这一群体对于防止青少年开始使用电子烟至关重要。易感青少年和非易感青少年之间存在显著的人口统计学差异,这表明针对使用过其他物质的男学生的电子烟预防工作可能对防止未来使用电子烟尤为重要。需要进行研究,以确定最有效的预防战略,以接触易感青年。
{"title":"E-Cigarette Susceptibility as a Predictor of Youth Initiation of E-Cigarettes","authors":"K. Bold, Grace Kong, D. Cavallo, D. Camenga, S. Krishnan-Sarin","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw393","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw393","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\u0000Identifying youth at risk for future e-cigarette use is critical for informing prevention efforts. Prior research established measures of susceptibility to conventional cigarettes, and this study aimed to examine whether items adapted for e-cigarette susceptibility predicted subsequent e-cigarette use among never e-cigarette users.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Longitudinal school-wide survey data were collected from middle and high school students in Fall 2013 (wave 1) and Spring 2014 (wave 2). Among never e-cigarette users at wave 1 (n = 1720), e-cigarette susceptibility was measured by two items assessing anticipation of experimenting with e-cigarettes in the future and willingness to use an e-cigarette if offered by a best friend. Logistic regression models examined susceptibility as a predictor of e-cigarette initiation and past 30-day use 6 months later at wave 2. Models were clustered by school and controlled for sex, age, race, SES, and other substance use (alcohol, marijuana, and other tobacco).\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000In total, 8.9% (n = 153) of youth initiated e-cigarettes and 3.7% (n = 63) reported past 30-day use at wave 2. E-cigarette susceptibility was a significant independent predictor of subsequent initiation (OR = 4.27, 95% CI = 3.12-5.85) and past 30-day e-cigarette use (OR = 5.10, 95%CI = 3.38-7.68) 6 months later. Susceptible youth were more likely to be male, older, and have used alcohol, marijuana, or other tobacco products.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000These findings provide initial support for adapting two susceptibility items to identify adolescents at risk for future e-cigarette use. Identifying strategies that are effective for targeting susceptible youth and preventing future e-cigarette use will be critical areas for future research.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000More than a quarter of the sample who reported both a willingness to try e-cigarettes if offered by a best friend and anticipation of experimenting with e-cigarettes in the future went on to try e-cigarettes within the academic year, suggesting that targeting this group will be critical for preventing youth e-cigarette initiation. There were notable demographic differences between susceptible and non-susceptible youth, suggesting targeting e-cigarette prevention efforts to male students who have used other substances may be especially important for preventing future e-cigarette use. Research is needed to determine the most effective prevention strategies to reach susceptible youth.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"140–144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88004388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Perceptions of Snus Among US Adult Smokers Given Free Product 给予免费产品的美国成年吸烟者对鼻烟的看法
Pub Date : 2016-12-29 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw392
Ellen Meier, Jessica L. Burris, A. Wahlquist, E. Garrett-Mayer, K. Gray, A. Alberg, K. Cummings, M. Carpenter
IntroductionSnus uptake is nominal among US smokers. This longitudinal study examines (1) perceptions of snus among US smokers given free snus for 6 weeks and (2) a method for assessment of an alternative tobacco product at the population level.MethodsAdult smokers (n = 543; 69.2% female; Mage = 49.3 years), uninterested in quitting, received free snus for ad libitum use. Based on their snus use during a 6-week sampling period, participants included: (1) never users (18.4%, n = 100); (2) experimenters; that is, used ≥ once, but not during the last week of sampling (33.1%; n = 180); and (3) persistent users; that is, used ≥ once during the final week, and ≥ once during any other week of the sampling period. (48.4%; n = 263).ResultsFollowing the sampling period, those who became persistent users were more likely than experimenters to report that switching to alternative tobacco products would lower their risk for health problems (66.5% vs. 50.0%; p = .006). Persistent users also reported greater negative affect relief and craving reduction (ps < .001) than experimenters. Finally, persistent users were more likely than experimenters to describe snus in favorable terms with respect to ease of use, satisfaction, and liking (ps < .05).ConclusionsSubjective experiences with snus, rather than nicotine dependence, explained experimentation versus persistent use. Even among smokers who became persistent snus users, snus was perceived as a poor substitute for cigarettes. This study design (randomized, yet naturalistic) could be extended to other novel tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to help understand the role new products may have in the tobacco landscape.ImplicationsThis is the first large scale, US-based naturalistic assessment of smokers' reactions to snus during an extended sampling period. This study is directly in line with FDA goals to better understand predictors of initiation, uptake, and use of other tobacco products such as snus, and serves as model for assessment methods of alternative tobacco products at the population level. Most smokers tried the provided sample of snus (approximately 82%). Subjective experiences with snus, rather than nicotine dependence, explained experimentation versus persistent use. Even among smokers who became persistent snus users, snus was perceived as a poor substitute for cigarettes.
在美国吸烟者中,鼻烟的摄入量是微不足道的。这项纵向研究考察了(1)给予6周免费鼻烟的美国吸烟者对鼻烟的看法,(2)在人口水平上评估替代烟草产品的方法。方法成年吸烟者(n = 543;69.2%的女性;法师(49.3岁)对戒烟不感兴趣,得到免费的鼻烟供随意使用。根据他们在6周抽样期间的鼻烟使用情况,参与者包括:(1)从不使用鼻烟(18.4%,n = 100);(2)实验;即使用≥1次,但不在采样的最后一周使用(33.1%;N = 180);(3)持久用户;即在最后一周≥1次,在采样周期的其他任何一周≥1次。(48.4%;N = 263)。结果在抽样期结束后,那些成为长期吸烟者的人比实验者更有可能报告说,改用替代烟草制品会降低他们出现健康问题的风险(66.5% vs 50.0%;P = .006)。与试验者相比,长期使用者也报告了更大的负面影响缓解和渴望减少(ps < 0.001)。最后,长期使用者比实验者更有可能在易用性、满意度和喜欢度方面对鼻烟进行有利的描述(ps < 0.05)。结论鼻烟的主观体验,而不是尼古丁依赖,解释了实验与持续使用。即使在那些成为长期鼻烟使用者的吸烟者中,鼻烟也被认为是香烟的糟糕替代品。本研究设计(随机,但自然)可以扩展到其他新型烟草产品,包括电子烟,以帮助了解新产品在烟草领域可能发挥的作用。这是第一次大规模的,基于美国的自然评估吸烟者对鼻烟的反应,在一个延长的抽样期间。这项研究直接符合FDA的目标,即更好地了解鼻烟等其他烟草制品的开始、吸收和使用的预测因素,并可作为人群水平上替代烟草制品评估方法的模型。大多数吸烟者尝试了提供的鼻烟样本(约82%)。对鼻烟的主观体验,而不是尼古丁依赖,解释了实验与持续使用的区别。即使在那些成为长期鼻烟使用者的吸烟者中,鼻烟也被认为是香烟的糟糕替代品。
{"title":"Perceptions of Snus Among US Adult Smokers Given Free Product","authors":"Ellen Meier, Jessica L. Burris, A. Wahlquist, E. Garrett-Mayer, K. Gray, A. Alberg, K. Cummings, M. Carpenter","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw392","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\u0000Snus uptake is nominal among US smokers. This longitudinal study examines (1) perceptions of snus among US smokers given free snus for 6 weeks and (2) a method for assessment of an alternative tobacco product at the population level.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Adult smokers (n = 543; 69.2% female; Mage = 49.3 years), uninterested in quitting, received free snus for ad libitum use. Based on their snus use during a 6-week sampling period, participants included: (1) never users (18.4%, n = 100); (2) experimenters; that is, used ≥ once, but not during the last week of sampling (33.1%; n = 180); and (3) persistent users; that is, used ≥ once during the final week, and ≥ once during any other week of the sampling period. (48.4%; n = 263).\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Following the sampling period, those who became persistent users were more likely than experimenters to report that switching to alternative tobacco products would lower their risk for health problems (66.5% vs. 50.0%; p = .006). Persistent users also reported greater negative affect relief and craving reduction (ps < .001) than experimenters. Finally, persistent users were more likely than experimenters to describe snus in favorable terms with respect to ease of use, satisfaction, and liking (ps < .05).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000Subjective experiences with snus, rather than nicotine dependence, explained experimentation versus persistent use. Even among smokers who became persistent snus users, snus was perceived as a poor substitute for cigarettes. This study design (randomized, yet naturalistic) could be extended to other novel tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to help understand the role new products may have in the tobacco landscape.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000This is the first large scale, US-based naturalistic assessment of smokers' reactions to snus during an extended sampling period. This study is directly in line with FDA goals to better understand predictors of initiation, uptake, and use of other tobacco products such as snus, and serves as model for assessment methods of alternative tobacco products at the population level. Most smokers tried the provided sample of snus (approximately 82%). Subjective experiences with snus, rather than nicotine dependence, explained experimentation versus persistent use. Even among smokers who became persistent snus users, snus was perceived as a poor substitute for cigarettes.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"58 1","pages":"22–29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90189436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Association Between School-Level Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette Use and Student-Level Use Behaviors, Pre-Use Intentions, and Risk Perceptions: Evidence From the 2014 US National Youth Tobacco Survey 学校电子烟使用流行程度与学生使用行为、使用前意图和风险认知之间的关系:来自2014年美国全国青少年烟草调查的证据
Pub Date : 2016-12-27 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw395
Adam M. Lippert
BackgroundAdolescent electronic cigarette ("e-cigarette") use tripled in recent years, yet little is known about the school-level correlates of teenage e-cigarette use, harm and risk perceptions, or pre-use intentions to use.MethodsMultilevel regression and 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey data were used to assess school-level e-cigarette prevalence and person-level e-cigarette use as well as age at initiation and frequency of use (among initiates), expectations for future use (among abstainers), and perceived e-cigarette addictivity and harm.ResultsLifetime use was higher among students in medium- (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82, 2.89) and high- (OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 3.67, 5.90) versus low-use schools. Past 30-day use followed a similar pattern. Multilevel ordinal logistic models revealed that initiates from high-use schools reported more days of use in the past month (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.52, 3.33) and higher age-at-first-use (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.00) than students at low-use schools. Expectations for future use were higher among abstainers from medium- and high- versus low-use schools, and among all students, perceived addictivity and harm caused by e-cigarettes were lower in medium- and high- versus low-use schools.ConclusionSchool context is associated with multiple dimensions of e-cigarette use, pre-use intentions, and perceptions of e-cigarette health risks.ImplicationsThe current study demonstrates a link between school prevalence of e-cigarette use and student-level use, as well as perceived risks of e-cigarette use, age of initiation and frequency of use among users, and intentions to use among abstainers. Health communication and prevention initiatives should target school social environments to promote nicotine abstinence and a culture of health.
近年来,青少年电子烟(“电子烟”)的使用量增加了两倍,但对青少年电子烟使用、危害和风险认知或使用前使用意图在学校层面的相关性知之甚少。方法采用多水平回归和2014年全国青少年烟草调查数据来评估学校层面的电子烟流行情况和个人层面的电子烟使用情况,以及开始使用电子烟的年龄和频率,对未来使用电子烟的预期(戒烟者),以及对电子烟成瘾和危害的感知。结果中效学校(比值比[OR] = 2.30, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.82, 2.89)和高效学校(OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 3.67, 5.90)学生的生活时间使用高于低效学校。过去30天的使用情况与此类似。多层有序逻辑模型显示,与低使用率学校的学生相比,高使用率学校的新生报告在过去一个月里使用手机的天数更多(OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.52, 3.33),第一次使用手机的年龄更高(OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.00)。与低使用学校相比,中、高使用学校的戒毒者对未来使用电子烟的期望更高,在所有学生中,中、高使用学校的戒毒者对电子烟的成瘾程度和危害程度低于低使用学校。结论:学校环境与电子烟使用、使用前意图和对电子烟健康风险的认知的多个维度有关。目前的研究表明,学校电子烟使用的流行程度与学生水平的使用之间存在联系,以及使用电子烟的感知风险、用户开始使用的年龄和使用频率以及戒烟者的使用意图之间存在联系。健康沟通和预防举措应针对学校和社会环境,以促进尼古丁戒断和健康文化。
{"title":"Association Between School-Level Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette Use and Student-Level Use Behaviors, Pre-Use Intentions, and Risk Perceptions: Evidence From the 2014 US National Youth Tobacco Survey","authors":"Adam M. Lippert","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw395","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000Adolescent electronic cigarette (\"e-cigarette\") use tripled in recent years, yet little is known about the school-level correlates of teenage e-cigarette use, harm and risk perceptions, or pre-use intentions to use.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Multilevel regression and 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey data were used to assess school-level e-cigarette prevalence and person-level e-cigarette use as well as age at initiation and frequency of use (among initiates), expectations for future use (among abstainers), and perceived e-cigarette addictivity and harm.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Lifetime use was higher among students in medium- (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82, 2.89) and high- (OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 3.67, 5.90) versus low-use schools. Past 30-day use followed a similar pattern. Multilevel ordinal logistic models revealed that initiates from high-use schools reported more days of use in the past month (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.52, 3.33) and higher age-at-first-use (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.00) than students at low-use schools. Expectations for future use were higher among abstainers from medium- and high- versus low-use schools, and among all students, perceived addictivity and harm caused by e-cigarettes were lower in medium- and high- versus low-use schools.\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000School context is associated with multiple dimensions of e-cigarette use, pre-use intentions, and perceptions of e-cigarette health risks.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000The current study demonstrates a link between school prevalence of e-cigarette use and student-level use, as well as perceived risks of e-cigarette use, age of initiation and frequency of use among users, and intentions to use among abstainers. Health communication and prevention initiatives should target school social environments to promote nicotine abstinence and a culture of health.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"231–238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89197924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Cigar Product Modification Among High School Youth 高中青少年雪茄产品改良研究
Pub Date : 2016-12-21 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw328
Erika S. Trapl, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Leslie E. Cofie, Laura D Yoder, Jean L. Frank, K. Sterling
IntroductionPrevalence of cigar use has been increasing among youth. Research indicates that youth are modifying cigar products either by "freaking" (ie, removing the filter paper) or "blunting" (removing the tobacco and supplementing or replacing with marijuana), yet little is known about youth who engage in this behavior. Thus, this study examines demographic and concurrent substance use behaviors of youth who modify cigars.MethodsData from the 2013 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior survey were examined (n = 16 855). The survey collected data on demographics, cigar product use, cigar modification behaviors, and current cigarette, hookah and marijuana use. Responses to cigar product use items were used to create a composite to classify youth in one of eight unique user categories. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated using SPSS complex samples procedures.ResultsOverall, 15.2% reported current cigar product use, 11.0% reported current freaking, and 18.5% reported current blunt use; taken together, 25.3% of respondents reported any current use of a cigar product. When examined by user category, of those who endorsed any cigar product use, cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars use only was most endorsed (26.3%), followed by Blunt only (25.2%) and all three (ie, cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars, freaking, and blunting; 17.4%).ConclusionA substantial proportion of high school youth who report using cigar products are modifying them in some way, with nearly half freaking and nearly two-thirds blunting. Given the FDA Center for Tobacco products recent extension of its regulatory authority to include cigar products, it is imperative to understand more about the prevalence of and reasons for cigar modification behaviors.ImplicationsAlthough the FDA has recently enacted regulatory authority over cigar products, little is known about cigar product modification. This is the first study to concurrently examine two unique cigar modification behaviors, "freaking" (ie, removing the filter paper) and "blunting" (removing the tobacco and supplementing or replacing with marijuana). A significant proportion of high school youth are modifying cigar products to be used as a tobacco product and as a mechanism to smoke marijuana. More research is needed to understand these behaviors to prevent and reduce the use of cigar products among youth.
在年轻人中,雪茄的使用率一直在上升。研究表明,年轻人正在通过“弄脏”(即去掉滤纸)或“弄钝”(去掉烟草并用大麻补充或代替)来修改雪茄产品,但对从事这种行为的年轻人知之甚少。因此,本研究考察了修改雪茄的青少年的人口统计学和并发物质使用行为。方法分析2013年凯霍加县青少年危险行为调查数据(n = 16855)。该调查收集了人口统计数据、雪茄产品使用情况、雪茄修改行为以及当前香烟、水烟和大麻的使用情况。对雪茄产品使用项目的回应被用来创建一个组合,以将青少年分类为八个独特的用户类别之一。单变量和双变量统计量采用SPSS复杂样本程序计算。结果总体而言,15.2%报告当前使用雪茄产品,11.0%报告当前使用雪茄产品,18.5%报告当前使用雪茄产品;总的来说,25.3%的受访者报告目前使用任何雪茄产品。当按用户类别进行调查时,在那些支持任何雪茄产品使用的用户中,雪茄、小雪茄和只使用小雪茄是最受欢迎的(26.3%),其次是Blunt(25.2%)和所有三种(即雪茄、小雪茄、小雪茄、怪物和钝化);17.4%)。结论:在使用雪茄产品的高中生中,有相当大比例的人正在以某种方式修改雪茄产品,近一半的人感到震惊,近三分之二的人感到迟钝。鉴于FDA烟草产品中心最近将其监管权力扩展到雪茄产品,有必要更多地了解雪茄改性行为的流行程度和原因。虽然FDA最近颁布了对雪茄产品的监管权力,但对雪茄产品的修改知之甚少。这是第一个同时研究两种独特的雪茄修饰行为的研究,“变”(即去掉滤纸)和“变钝”(去掉烟草并补充或替换大麻)。相当大比例的高中青少年正在改造雪茄产品,将其作为烟草产品使用,并作为吸食大麻的机制。需要更多的研究来了解这些行为,以防止和减少青少年使用雪茄产品。
{"title":"Cigar Product Modification Among High School Youth","authors":"Erika S. Trapl, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Leslie E. Cofie, Laura D Yoder, Jean L. Frank, K. Sterling","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw328","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw328","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\u0000Prevalence of cigar use has been increasing among youth. Research indicates that youth are modifying cigar products either by \"freaking\" (ie, removing the filter paper) or \"blunting\" (removing the tobacco and supplementing or replacing with marijuana), yet little is known about youth who engage in this behavior. Thus, this study examines demographic and concurrent substance use behaviors of youth who modify cigars.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Data from the 2013 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior survey were examined (n = 16 855). The survey collected data on demographics, cigar product use, cigar modification behaviors, and current cigarette, hookah and marijuana use. Responses to cigar product use items were used to create a composite to classify youth in one of eight unique user categories. Univariate and bivariate statistics were calculated using SPSS complex samples procedures.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Overall, 15.2% reported current cigar product use, 11.0% reported current freaking, and 18.5% reported current blunt use; taken together, 25.3% of respondents reported any current use of a cigar product. When examined by user category, of those who endorsed any cigar product use, cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars use only was most endorsed (26.3%), followed by Blunt only (25.2%) and all three (ie, cigars, cigarillos, and little cigars, freaking, and blunting; 17.4%).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000A substantial proportion of high school youth who report using cigar products are modifying them in some way, with nearly half freaking and nearly two-thirds blunting. Given the FDA Center for Tobacco products recent extension of its regulatory authority to include cigar products, it is imperative to understand more about the prevalence of and reasons for cigar modification behaviors.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000Although the FDA has recently enacted regulatory authority over cigar products, little is known about cigar product modification. This is the first study to concurrently examine two unique cigar modification behaviors, \"freaking\" (ie, removing the filter paper) and \"blunting\" (removing the tobacco and supplementing or replacing with marijuana). A significant proportion of high school youth are modifying cigar products to be used as a tobacco product and as a mechanism to smoke marijuana. More research is needed to understand these behaviors to prevent and reduce the use of cigar products among youth.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"83 1","pages":"370–376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76949939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
Characteristics of “American Snus” and Swedish Snus Products for Sale in Massachusetts, USA 在美国马萨诸塞州销售的“美国鼻烟”和瑞典鼻烟产品的特点
Pub Date : 2016-12-21 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw334
A. Seidenberg, O. Ayo-Yusuf, V. Rees
IntroductionSnus may present lower health risks than cigarettes, but its harm reduction potential may be undermined if used dually with cigarettes. The likelihood of exclusive snus use compared with dual use may depend in part on the capacity of snus to deliver nicotine in doses that are satisfactory to smokers. We examined characteristics of "American snus" products, including nicotine levels, and compared to snus products that are more typical of Sweden.MethodsTobacco industry reports for snus products submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for the year 2014 were used to assess moisture (%), pH, total nicotine, and unionized (free) nicotine (both mg/g and percent of total). A total of 14 ("American") snus products made by American manufacturers Philip Morris USA (n = 6), R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (n = 6), and US Smokeless Tobacco Company (n = 2), were compared with Swedish-style ("Swedish") snus products (n = 10) made by Swedish Match North America.ResultsCompared with Swedish snus, American snus brands contained significantly lower concentrations of unionized nicotine (median: 0.52 mg/g vs. 6.52 mg/g; p < .001) and proportion of unionized nicotine (median: 3.17% vs. 81.8%; p < .001). American snus brands also had significantly lower pH (median: 6.54 vs. 8.68; p < .001) and moisture (median: 30.3% vs. 53.4%; p < .001).ConclusionsSwedish-made snus has higher unionized nicotine, measured by concentration and proportion of total nicotine, compared with snus products made by American manufacturers. These findings suggest that American snus products have lower addiction potential than Swedish snus, and may be more likely to be used dually with cigarettes than as a sole source of nicotine.ImplicationsAmerican snus products contain significantly lower unionized nicotine, lower pH, and lower moisture, compared with Swedish snus products. Snus addiction potential and patterns of usage, including co-use with cigarettes, may differ between American and Swedish snus products due to differences in snus product characteristics.
鼻烟的健康风险可能比香烟低,但如果与香烟同时使用,其减少危害的潜力可能会被削弱。与双重用途相比,单独使用鼻烟的可能性部分取决于鼻烟以吸烟者满意的剂量提供尼古丁的能力。我们研究了“美国鼻烟”产品的特征,包括尼古丁水平,并将其与更典型的瑞典鼻烟产品进行了比较。方法采用2014年烟草业向马萨诸塞州公共卫生部门提交的鼻烟产品报告,评估鼻烟产品的水分(%)、pH、总尼古丁和游离尼古丁(mg/g和占总尼古丁的百分比)。将美国制造商菲利普莫里斯美国公司(n = 6)、雷诺烟草公司(n = 6)和美国无烟烟草公司(n = 2)生产的14种(“美式”)鼻烟产品与瑞典火柴北美公司生产的瑞典风格(“Swedish”)鼻烟产品(n = 10)进行比较。结果与瑞典鼻烟相比,美国品牌鼻烟的游离尼古丁浓度显著低于瑞典品牌(中位数:0.52 mg/g vs. 6.52 mg/g;P < 0.001)和尼古丁结块比例(中位数:3.17% vs. 81.8%;P < 0.001)。美国鼻烟品牌的pH值也明显较低(中位数:6.54 vs. 8.68;P < 0.001)和湿度(中位数:30.3% vs. 53.4%;P < 0.001)。结论瑞典产鼻烟的总烟碱浓度和总烟碱比例高于美国产鼻烟。这些发现表明,美国鼻烟产品比瑞典鼻烟具有更低的成瘾潜力,并且可能更有可能与香烟双重使用,而不是作为尼古丁的唯一来源。与瑞典鼻烟产品相比,美国鼻烟产品含有明显较低的游离尼古丁,较低的pH值和较低的水分。由于鼻烟产品特性的差异,美国和瑞典的鼻烟产品可能会导致鼻烟成瘾的可能性和使用模式,包括与香烟共同使用。
{"title":"Characteristics of “American Snus” and Swedish Snus Products for Sale in Massachusetts, USA","authors":"A. Seidenberg, O. Ayo-Yusuf, V. Rees","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw334","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\u0000Snus may present lower health risks than cigarettes, but its harm reduction potential may be undermined if used dually with cigarettes. The likelihood of exclusive snus use compared with dual use may depend in part on the capacity of snus to deliver nicotine in doses that are satisfactory to smokers. We examined characteristics of \"American snus\" products, including nicotine levels, and compared to snus products that are more typical of Sweden.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Tobacco industry reports for snus products submitted to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for the year 2014 were used to assess moisture (%), pH, total nicotine, and unionized (free) nicotine (both mg/g and percent of total). A total of 14 (\"American\") snus products made by American manufacturers Philip Morris USA (n = 6), R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (n = 6), and US Smokeless Tobacco Company (n = 2), were compared with Swedish-style (\"Swedish\") snus products (n = 10) made by Swedish Match North America.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000Compared with Swedish snus, American snus brands contained significantly lower concentrations of unionized nicotine (median: 0.52 mg/g vs. 6.52 mg/g; p < .001) and proportion of unionized nicotine (median: 3.17% vs. 81.8%; p < .001). American snus brands also had significantly lower pH (median: 6.54 vs. 8.68; p < .001) and moisture (median: 30.3% vs. 53.4%; p < .001).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusions\u0000Swedish-made snus has higher unionized nicotine, measured by concentration and proportion of total nicotine, compared with snus products made by American manufacturers. These findings suggest that American snus products have lower addiction potential than Swedish snus, and may be more likely to be used dually with cigarettes than as a sole source of nicotine.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000American snus products contain significantly lower unionized nicotine, lower pH, and lower moisture, compared with Swedish snus products. Snus addiction potential and patterns of usage, including co-use with cigarettes, may differ between American and Swedish snus products due to differences in snus product characteristics.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"262–266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81854377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Tobacco Consumption and Toxicant Exposure of Cigarette Smokers Using Electronic Cigarettes 使用电子烟的吸烟者的烟草消费和有毒物质暴露
Pub Date : 2016-12-21 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw333
Kim Pulvers, Ashley S Emami, Nicole L. Nollen, Devan R Romero, D. Strong, N. Benowitz, J. Ahluwalia
BackgroundThere is considerable debate about the benefits and risks of electronic cigarettes (ECs). To better understand the risk-benefit ratio of ECs, more information is needed about net nicotine consumption and toxicant exposure of cigarette smokers switching to ECs.MethodsForty cigarette smokers (≥1 year of smoking) interested in switching to ECs but not necessarily quitting smoking were enrolled in a 4-week observational study and provided an e-Go C non-variable battery and refillable atomizers and choice of eight flavors in 12 or 24 mg nicotine dosage. Measurement of urinary cotinine (metabolite of nicotine), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL; a pulmonary carcinogen), and eight volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents was conducted at baseline and week 4.ResultsAll participants with follow-up data (92.5%) reported using the study EC. Of the 40 smokers, 16 reported no cigarettes at week 2 (40%) and six continued to report no cigarettes at week 4 (15%). Change in nicotine intake over the 4 weeks was non-significant (p = .90). Carbon monoxide (p < .001), NNAL (p < .01) and metabolites of benzene (p < .01) and acrylonitrile (p = .001) were significantly decreased in the study sample. Smokers switching exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period demonstrated significant reductions in metabolites of ethylene oxide (p = .03) and acrylamide (p < .01).ConclusionSmokers using ECs over 4 weeks maintained cotinine levels and experienced significant reductions in carbon monoxide, NNAL, and two out of eight measured VOC metabolites. Those who switched exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period significantly reduced two additional VOCs.ImplicationsThis study extends current literature by measuring change in smoking dependence and disease-associated biomarkers, NNAL and a panel of eight common VOCs that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents in smokers who switch to ECs. The findings support the idea of harm reduction, however some levels of toxicant exposure are still of clinical concern, particularly for dual users. Extrapolation of these results must be careful to separate the different toxic exposure results for exclusive switchers versus dual cigarette + EC users, and not to equate harm reduction with the idea that using ECs is harmless.
关于电子烟(ECs)的益处和风险存在相当大的争论。为了更好地了解电子烟的风险收益比,需要更多关于吸烟者转向电子烟时尼古丁净摄入量和有毒物质暴露的信息。方法40名有兴趣改用电子烟但不一定戒烟的吸烟者(吸烟1年以上)参加了一项为期4周的观察性研究,提供e-Go C非可变电池和可重新填充的雾化器,并选择8种尼古丁剂量为12或24 mg的口味。尿可替宁(尼古丁代谢物)、4-(甲基亚硝胺)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁醇(NNAL)的测定在基线和第4周进行了8种有毒烟草烟雾成分的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)。所有随访数据的参与者(92.5%)报告使用了研究EC。在这40名吸烟者中,16人在第2周没有吸烟(40%),6人在第4周继续没有吸烟(15%)。4周内尼古丁摄入量的变化无统计学意义(p = 0.90)。一氧化碳(p < .001)、NNAL (p < .01)以及苯(p < .01)和丙烯腈(p = .001)的代谢物在研究样品中显著降低。在至少一半的研究期间,吸烟者只使用ECs,其代谢产物环氧乙烷(p = 0.03)和丙烯酰胺(p < 0.01)显著减少。结论:使用ECs超过4周的吸烟者维持了可替宁水平,并且一氧化碳、NNAL和8种测量的VOC代谢物中的2种显著降低。那些在至少一半的研究期间只使用挥发性有机化合物的人显著减少了另外两种挥发性有机化合物。本研究通过测量吸烟依赖性和疾病相关生物标志物、NNAL和一组8种常见挥发性有机化合物的变化来扩展现有文献,这些挥发性有机化合物是吸烟者转向ECs的有毒烟草烟雾成分。研究结果支持减少危害的观点,然而,某些程度的有毒物质暴露仍然是临床关注的问题,特别是对于双重使用者。对这些结果进行推断时,必须小心区分单独吸烟者与双烟+电子烟使用者的不同毒性暴露结果,不要把减少危害等同于使用电子烟无害的想法。
{"title":"Tobacco Consumption and Toxicant Exposure of Cigarette Smokers Using Electronic Cigarettes","authors":"Kim Pulvers, Ashley S Emami, Nicole L. Nollen, Devan R Romero, D. Strong, N. Benowitz, J. Ahluwalia","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntw333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw333","url":null,"abstract":"Background\u0000There is considerable debate about the benefits and risks of electronic cigarettes (ECs). To better understand the risk-benefit ratio of ECs, more information is needed about net nicotine consumption and toxicant exposure of cigarette smokers switching to ECs.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000Forty cigarette smokers (≥1 year of smoking) interested in switching to ECs but not necessarily quitting smoking were enrolled in a 4-week observational study and provided an e-Go C non-variable battery and refillable atomizers and choice of eight flavors in 12 or 24 mg nicotine dosage. Measurement of urinary cotinine (metabolite of nicotine), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL; a pulmonary carcinogen), and eight volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents was conducted at baseline and week 4.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000All participants with follow-up data (92.5%) reported using the study EC. Of the 40 smokers, 16 reported no cigarettes at week 2 (40%) and six continued to report no cigarettes at week 4 (15%). Change in nicotine intake over the 4 weeks was non-significant (p = .90). Carbon monoxide (p < .001), NNAL (p < .01) and metabolites of benzene (p < .01) and acrylonitrile (p = .001) were significantly decreased in the study sample. Smokers switching exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period demonstrated significant reductions in metabolites of ethylene oxide (p = .03) and acrylamide (p < .01).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000Smokers using ECs over 4 weeks maintained cotinine levels and experienced significant reductions in carbon monoxide, NNAL, and two out of eight measured VOC metabolites. Those who switched exclusively to ECs for at least half of the study period significantly reduced two additional VOCs.\u0000\u0000\u0000Implications\u0000This study extends current literature by measuring change in smoking dependence and disease-associated biomarkers, NNAL and a panel of eight common VOCs that are toxic tobacco smoke constituents in smokers who switch to ECs. The findings support the idea of harm reduction, however some levels of toxicant exposure are still of clinical concern, particularly for dual users. Extrapolation of these results must be careful to separate the different toxic exposure results for exclusive switchers versus dual cigarette + EC users, and not to equate harm reduction with the idea that using ECs is harmless.","PeriodicalId":19355,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine and Tobacco Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"206–214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78148238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
期刊
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1