Neuro-oncology最新文献

Background: Glutamine is an important nutriment for cancer cell growth that provides biological sources for nucleic acid and fatty acid synthesis, but the role of glutaminolysis in signal transduction and glioblastoma (GBM) progression remains little known.

Methods: Knockdown and overexpression cells were obtained to explore the functional roles of GDH1 in cell proliferation, tumor formation and aerobic glycolysis. RNA-seq, Chromatin immunoprecipitation, luciferase assay and western blot were performed to verify the regulation of EGFR-AKT pathway by the glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GDH1, also known as GLUD1) and KDM6A. Metabolite-level measurements and Seahorse Assay were performed to assess the functional role of GHD1 in reprogramming glycolysis.

Results: Here, we report that GDH1 catalytic glutaminolysis is essential for GBM cell line proliferation and brain tumorigenesis even in high-glucose conditions. Glutamine is metabolized through glutaminolysis to produce α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). We demonstrate that glutamine in combination with leucine activates mammalian TORC1 by enhancing glutaminolysis and α-KG production. α-KG increases the transcription of PDPK1 by reducing the suppressive histone modification H3K27me3, and then promotes the activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. This transcriptional activation induced by α-KG requires histone demethylase KDM6A, which is a 2-oxoglutarate oxygenase that plays important roles in converting α-KG to succinate. Furthermore, we show that GDH1-catalytic glutaminolysis also increases the expression of HK2 and promotes glycolysis in high-glucose condition dependent on KDM6A-mediated demethylation of H3K27.

Conclusion: These findings suggest a novel function of glutaminolysis in regulation of signal transduction and metabolism reprograming, provide further evidence for unique role of glutaminolysis in GBM progression.

Clinical trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with malignant gliomas have shown some early promise in pediatric and adult patients. However, the long-term benefits and safety for patients remain to be established. The ultimate success of CAR T-cell therapy for malignant glioma will require the integration of an in-depth understanding of the immunology of the central nervous system (CNS) parenchyma with strategies to overcome the paucity and heterogeneous expression of glioma-specific antigens. We also need to address the cold (immunosuppressive) microenvironment, exhaustion of the CAR T-cells, as well as local and systemic immunosuppression. Here, we discuss the basics and scientific considerations for CAR T-cell therapies and highlight recent clinical trials. To help identify optimal CAR T-cell administration routes, we summarize our current understanding of CNS immunology and T-cell homing to the CNS. We also discuss challenges and opportunities related to clinical trial design and patient safety/monitoring. Finally, we provide our perspective on future prospects in CAR T-cell therapy for malignant gliomas by discussing combinations and novel engineering strategies to overcome immuno-regulatory mechanisms. We hope this review will serve as a basis for advancing the field in a multiple discipline-based and collaborative manner.

Background: Glioma stem cells (GSCs) are the root cause of tumorigenesis, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma (GBM), the most prevalent and lethal type of primary adult brain malignancy. The exploitation of novel methods targeting GSCs is crucial for the treatment of GBM. In this study, we investigate the function of the novel ROR1-GRB2-c-Fos axis in GSCs maintenance and GBM progression.

Methods: The expression characteristics of ROR1 in GBM and GSCs were assessed by bioinformatic analysis, patient specimens, and patient-derived GSCs. Lentivirus-mediated gene knockdown and overexpression were conducted to evaluate the effect of ROR1 on GSCs proliferation and self-renewal both in vitro and in vivo. The downstream signaling of ROR1 in GSCs maintenance was unbiasedly determined by RNA-seq and validated both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, rescue assays were performed to further validate the function of the ROR1-GRB2-c-Fos axis in GSCs maintenance and GBM progression.

Results: ROR1 is upregulated in GBM and preferentially expressed in GSCs. Disruption of ROR1 markedly impairs GSC proliferation and self-renewal, and inhibits GBM growth in vivo. Moreover, ROR1 stabilizes GRB2 by directly binding and reducing its lysosomal degradation, and ROR1 knockdown significantly inhibits GRB2/ERK/c-Fos signaling in GSCs. Importantly, ectopic expression of c-Fos counteracts the effects caused by ROR1 silencing both in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions: ROR1 plays essential roles in GSCs maintenance through binding to GRB2 and activation of ERK/c-Fos signaling, which highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting the ROR1-GRB2-c-Fos axis.

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ages 15-39 years) are a vulnerable population facing challenges in oncological care, including access to specialized care, transition of care, unique tumor biology, and poor representation in clinical trials. Brain tumors are the second most common tumor type in AYA, with malignant brain tumors being the most common cause of cancer-related death. The 2021 WHO Classification for central nervous system (CNS) Tumors highlights the importance of integrated molecular characterization with histologic diagnosis in several tumors relevant to the AYA population. In this position paper from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the diagnosis and management of CNS tumors in AYA is reviewed, focusing on the most common tumor types in this population, namely glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and CNS germ cell tumor. Current challenges and future directions specific to AYA are also highlighted. Finally, possible solutions to address barriers in the care of AYA patients are discussed, emphasizing the need for multidisciplinary and collaborative approaches that span the pediatric and adult paradigms of care, and incorporating advanced molecular testing, targeted therapy, and AYA-centered care.

Background: In POLA cohort, three pathological groups of CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma IDH-mutant and 1p/19q co-deleted have been described: group 1 (high mitotic count only), group 2 (microvascular proliferation MVP and no necrosis), and group 3 (MVP and necrosis).

Methods: 494 patients from the POLA cohort, with a median follow up of 96 months were included. To identify the impact of the pathological groups and contrast enhancement in group 1 on overall survival (OS) or progression free survival (PFS), survival curves were obtained (Kaplan-Meier method) and compared (log-rank test). Prognostic value of clinical factors and CDKN2A homozygous deletion HD were also tested. Multivariate analysis was performed.

Results: Survival analysis demonstrated that the pathological groups were associated with both progression-free survival (PFS P=0.01) and overall survival (OS P=0.001). In group 1, patients with contrast enhancement (1CE+) had a poorer prognosis compared to those without (OS P=0.028, PFS P=0.006). Further stratification into group 1CE-, group 1CE+, group 2, and group 3 provided clearer prognostic distinctions (OS P=0.002, PFS P<0.0001). Other prognostic factors included age (OS P<0.0001, PFS P=0.002), extent of surgical resection (OS P=0.001, PFS P=0.003), KPS (OS P<0.0001, PFS P=0.002), postoperative treatment (OS P=0.007, PFS P<0.0001), and CDKN2A HD (OS and PFS P<0.0001). The pathological groups remained of prognostic significance for PFS in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: Necrosis and CDKN2A HD are adverse prognostic factors of WHO grade 3 oligodendrogliomas, IDH mutant and 1p/19q co-deleted. Besides, in group 1 patients, lack of contrast enhancement is a factor of better prognosis.

The field of immunology has traditionally focused on immune checkpoint modulation of adaptive immune cells. However, many malignancies such as glioblastoma are mostly devoid of T cells and rather are enriched with immunosuppressive myeloid cells of the innate immune system. While some immune checkpoint targets are shared between adaptive and innate immunity, myeloid-specific checkpoints could also serve as potential therapeutics. To better understand the impact of immune checkpoint blockade on myeloid cells, we systematically summarize the current literature focusing on the direct immunological effects of PD-L1/PD-1, CD24/Siglec-10, collagen/LAIR-1, CX3CL1/CX3CR1, and CXCL10/CXCR3. By synthesizing the molecular mechanisms and the translational implications, we aim to prioritize agents in this category of therapeutics for glioblastoma.

Background: Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) lacks effective life-prolonging treatments and the efficacy of systemic PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors is limited. The multi-cohort Glitipni phase I trial investigates the safety and feasibility of intraoperative intracerebral (iCer) and postoperative intracavitary (iCav) nivolumab (NIVO) ± ipilimumab (IPI) treatment following maximal safe resection (MSR) in rHGG.

Materials and methods: Patients received 10 mg IV NIVO within 24 h before surgery, followed by MSR, iCer 5 mg IPI and 10 mg NIVO, and Ommaya catheter placement in the resection cavity. Biweekly postoperative iCav administrations of 1-5-10 mg NIVO (cohort 4) or 10 mg NIVO plus 1-5-10 mg IPI (cohort 7) were combined with 10 mg IV NIVO for 11 cycles.

Results: 42 rHGG patients underwent MSR with iCer NIVO + IPI. 16 pts were treated in cohort 4 (postoperative iCav NIVO at escalating doses) while 28 patients were treated in cohort 7 (intra and postoperative iCav NIVO and escalating doses of IPI). The most common TRAE was fatigue; no grade 5 AE occurred. Dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 neutrophilic pleocytosis (4 pts) receiving iCav NIVO plus 5 or 10 mg IPI. PFS and OS did not significantly differ between cohorts (median OS: 42 [95% CI 26-57] vs. 35 [29-40] weeks; 1-year OS rate: 37% vs. 29%). Baseline B7-H3 expression significantly correlated with worse survival. OS compared favorably to a historical pooled cohort (n = 469) of Belgian rHGG pts treated with anti-VEGF therapies (log-rank P = .015).

Conclusion: Intraoperative iCer IPI + NIVO with postoperative iCav NIVO ± IPI up to biweekly doses of 1 mg IPI + 10 mg NIVO is feasible and safe, showing encouraging OS in rHGG patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03233152.

The prognosis for patients with brain metastasis remains dismal despite intensive therapy including surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemo-, targeted and immunotherapy. Thus, there is a high medical need for new therapeutic options. Recent advances employing high-throughput and spatially resolved single-cell analyses have provided unprecedented insights into the composition and phenotypes of the diverse immune cells in the metastatic brain, revealing a unique immune landscape starkly different from that of primary brain tumours or other metastatic sites. This review summarises the current evidence on the composition and phenotypes of the most prominent immune cells in the brain metastatic niche, along with their dynamic interactions with metastatic tumour cells and each other. As the most abundant immune cell types in this niche, we explore in detail the phenotypic heterogeneity and functional plasticity of tumour-associated macrophages, including both resident microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages, as well as the T-cell compartment. We also review pre-clinical and clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic potential of targeting the immune microenvironment in brain metastasis. Given the substantial evidence highlighting a significant role of the immune microenvironmental niche in brain metastasis pathogenesis, a comprehensive understanding of the key molecular and cellular factors within this niche holds great promise for developing novel therapeutic approaches as well as innovative combinatory treatment strategies for brain metastasis.

Background: Diffuse midline glioma (DMG) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in children. All previous studies examining the role of systemic agents have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit; the only standard of care is radiation therapy (RT). Successful implementation of radiosensitization strategies in DMG remains an essential and promising avenue of investigation. We explore the use of Napabucasin, an NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1)-bioactivatable reactive oxygen species (ROS)-inducer, as a potential therapeutic radiosensitizer in DMG.

Methods: In this study, we conduct in vitro and in vivo assays using patient-derived DMG cultures to elucidate the mechanism of action of Napabucasin and its radiosensitizing properties. As penetration of systemic therapy through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a significant limitation to the success of DMG therapies, we explore focused ultrasound (FUS) and convection-enhanced delivery (CED) to overcome the BBB and maximize therapeutic efficacy.

Results: Napabucasin is a potent ROS-inducer and radiosensitizer in DMG, and treatment-mediated ROS production and cytotoxicity are dependent on NQO1. In subcutaneous xenograft models, combination therapy with RT improves local control. After optimizing targeted drug delivery using CED in an orthotopic mouse model, we establish the novel feasibility and survival benefit of CED of Napabucasin concurrent with RT.

Conclusions: As nearly all DMG patients will receive RT as part of their treatment course, our validation of the efficacy of radiosensitizing therapy using CED to prolong survival in DMG opens the door for exciting novel studies of alternative radiosensitization strategies in this devastating disease while overcoming limitations of the BBB.