首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey最新文献

英文 中文
Pain With Differing Insufflation Pressures During Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial 机器人骶骶固定术中不同充气压力的疼痛:一项随机对照试验
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000993684.04252.86
Gabriella M. Rustia, Michael G. Baracy, Emilee Khair, Karen H. Hagglund, Muhammad Faisal Aslam
ABSTRACT Pain after surgery may have different origins, such as incisions, affected viscera, surgical positioning, or peritoneal irritation from insufflation. Shoulder pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery is a common concern thought to be associated with peritoneal irritation. Decreasing this pain is therefore a target for improvement of analgesic requirements and overall postoperative pain. This study aimed to determine changes in postoperative pain, surgical safety, and analgesic use via decreased insufflation pressures. The study was designed as a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial at a singular medical center within the United States where surgical treatment took place for pelvic organ prolapse via robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Included were women 18 years or older who were able to complete the visual analog scale without assistance and who underwent scheduled robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. After inclusion, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with peritoneal insufflation pressure at either 12 mm Hg (experimental) or 15 mm Hg (standard). Surgeries were performed by a single board-certified urogynecologist and resident assistant using a standard technique, the DaVinci Xi system, and an 8-mm AirSeal assist port. Surgeons and assisting OR professionals were not blinded to insufflation pressure. On the first postoperative day, all participants were asked to rate pain via a visual analog scale, as well as at 2 weeks postoperatively (with the addition of a PGI-I questionnaire). The 2-week surveys were collected by the principal investigator or primary surgeon (unblinded). A Likert scale of 0 to 10 was used to rate the highest preoperative and postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. At the time of surgery, preoperative analgesia and opioid use were verified with active prescription records. After surgery, data were recorded for operative time, analgesic doses, conversion to laparotomy or increased insufflation pressure, additionally performed procedures, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Enrollment occurred from April 27, 2021, to May 17, 2022, with final follow-up being completed on June 1, 2022. A total of 80 participants were enrolled, with 41 in the experimental insufflation group, and 39 in the standard insufflation group. Baseline differences did not exist between groups for prior abdominal surgeries, medical comorbidities, leading edge of prolapse, age, or body mass index. Although median preoperative pain was recorded as zero for both groups, the standard insufflation group did report a statistically higher pain level in the postoperative period. Furthermore, women in the experimental/lower insufflation group used statistically fewer morphine milliequivalents immediately after surgery as well as after discharge. There were no apparent operative problems significantly associated with lower insufflation pressures, as operative time, estimated blood loss,
术后疼痛可能有不同的原因,如切口、受累脏器、手术体位或腹膜充盈引起的刺激。妇科腹腔镜手术后肩痛是一个常见的问题,被认为与腹膜刺激有关。因此,减少这种疼痛是改善镇痛需求和整体术后疼痛的目标。本研究旨在通过降低充气压力来确定术后疼痛、手术安全性和镇痛药物使用的变化。该研究被设计为一项单盲、随机临床试验,在美国的一个医疗中心,通过机器人辅助的骶髋固定术对盆腔器官脱垂进行手术治疗。包括18岁或以上的女性,她们能够在没有帮助的情况下完成视觉模拟量表,并接受了预定的机器人辅助的骶髋固定术。纳入后,参与者以1:1的比例随机接受机器人辅助的骶colpop固定术,腹膜注入压力为12毫米汞柱(实验)或15毫米汞柱(标准)。外科医生和辅助手术室专业人员并没有对充气压力视而不见。在术后第一天,所有参与者都被要求通过视觉模拟量表对疼痛进行评分,以及在术后2周(增加了一份PGI-I问卷)。为期2周的调查由主要研究者或主要外科医生(非盲法)收集。使用0 - 10的李克特量表对麻醉后护理单元中最高的术前和术后疼痛进行评分。在手术时,术前镇痛和阿片类药物的使用通过有效处方记录进行验证。手术后,记录手术时间、镇痛剂量、转开腹或增加充气压力、额外手术、估计失血量和住院时间等数据。入组时间为2021年4月27日至2022年5月17日,最终随访于2022年6月1日完成。共纳入80例受试者,其中41例为实验充气组,39例为标准充气组。各组之间在既往腹部手术、医疗合并症、脱垂前沿、年龄或体重指数方面没有基线差异。虽然两组的术前疼痛中位数均为零,但标准充气组在术后期间确实报告了统计学上更高的疼痛水平。此外,实验/低注射量组的女性在手术后和出院后立即使用的吗啡毫当量在统计学上更少。由于手术时间、估计失血量和住院时间在两组之间没有显著差异,因此没有明显的手术问题与较低的充气压力显著相关。分析发现,与15毫米汞柱相比,术后立即使用12毫米汞柱充气压力确实降低了阿片类药物的使用和疼痛水平。该方法在所有病例中均被证明是可行和安全的,无出血量、手术时间的改变,也没有微创混乱导致完成病例的变化。这些令人鼓舞的发现为机器人妇科手术术后提供了一种零成本、外科医生驱动的干预方法,可能会降低患者的疼痛水平和阿片类药物的使用。
{"title":"Pain With Differing Insufflation Pressures During Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Gabriella M. Rustia, Michael G. Baracy, Emilee Khair, Karen H. Hagglund, Muhammad Faisal Aslam","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000993684.04252.86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000993684.04252.86","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Pain after surgery may have different origins, such as incisions, affected viscera, surgical positioning, or peritoneal irritation from insufflation. Shoulder pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery is a common concern thought to be associated with peritoneal irritation. Decreasing this pain is therefore a target for improvement of analgesic requirements and overall postoperative pain. This study aimed to determine changes in postoperative pain, surgical safety, and analgesic use via decreased insufflation pressures. The study was designed as a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial at a singular medical center within the United States where surgical treatment took place for pelvic organ prolapse via robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Included were women 18 years or older who were able to complete the visual analog scale without assistance and who underwent scheduled robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. After inclusion, participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy with peritoneal insufflation pressure at either 12 mm Hg (experimental) or 15 mm Hg (standard). Surgeries were performed by a single board-certified urogynecologist and resident assistant using a standard technique, the DaVinci Xi system, and an 8-mm AirSeal assist port. Surgeons and assisting OR professionals were not blinded to insufflation pressure. On the first postoperative day, all participants were asked to rate pain via a visual analog scale, as well as at 2 weeks postoperatively (with the addition of a PGI-I questionnaire). The 2-week surveys were collected by the principal investigator or primary surgeon (unblinded). A Likert scale of 0 to 10 was used to rate the highest preoperative and postoperative pain in the postanesthesia care unit. At the time of surgery, preoperative analgesia and opioid use were verified with active prescription records. After surgery, data were recorded for operative time, analgesic doses, conversion to laparotomy or increased insufflation pressure, additionally performed procedures, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Enrollment occurred from April 27, 2021, to May 17, 2022, with final follow-up being completed on June 1, 2022. A total of 80 participants were enrolled, with 41 in the experimental insufflation group, and 39 in the standard insufflation group. Baseline differences did not exist between groups for prior abdominal surgeries, medical comorbidities, leading edge of prolapse, age, or body mass index. Although median preoperative pain was recorded as zero for both groups, the standard insufflation group did report a statistically higher pain level in the postoperative period. Furthermore, women in the experimental/lower insufflation group used statistically fewer morphine milliequivalents immediately after surgery as well as after discharge. There were no apparent operative problems significantly associated with lower insufflation pressures, as operative time, estimated blood loss,","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136010003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference 卵巢癌证据审查会议执行摘要
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000993692.30944.ce
William Burke, Joel Barkley, Emily Barrows, Rebecca Brooks, Kimberly Gecsi, Kathryn Huber-Keener, Myrlene Jeudy, Shirley Mei, Julia Sage O’Hara, David Chelmow
ABSTRACT Ovarian cancer has the 17th highest incidence among all cancers in the United States; however, it is the deadliest gynecologic cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to create educational materials for clinicians on the early diagnosis and prevention of gynecologic cancers. This article is an evidence summary based on ACOG's extensive literature review on the early diagnosis and prevention of ovarian cancer. An expert panel was recruited from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review and summarize evidence from articles published between January 2000 and October 2021. Topics used to frame the literature review included the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, risk factors, prevention and risk reduction, screening strategies and early detection, health disparities, diagnosis and care coordination by primary care providers, and special considerations. The Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference occurred in February 2022 where the expert panel and stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations discussed their findings and drafted summaries to develop educational materials. Review of the epidemiology revealed that in 2022 there were 19,880 new cases of ovarian cancer, 12,810 women died of ovarian cancer, 5-year survival is 49.7% and correlates strongly with stage at diagnosis, and fewer than 10% of women with stage 1 disease will have recurrence. Risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, inactivity, nulliparity, early menarche, late menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy, genetic mutations such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 , and endometriosis. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces incidence of ovarian cancer by 80% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.39) and is recommended by ACOG for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Contraception, physical activity, and lactation may help reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. The most common methods studied for screening include transvaginal ultrasonography, bimanual palpation, and measuring tumor marker CA-125. The Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm uses CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound to estimate the risk of ovarian cancer based on age and change in CA-125; however, it is still being studied, and no established screening method exists for asymptomatic women. Several organizations including ACOG support identifying women at high risk and subsequent genetic counseling. Symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific and include abdominal distention and pain, and while workup should include ultrasonography and CA-125 measurement, no high-quality studies have compared imaging, biomarkers, risk algorithms, or multimodal risk assessment tools for the primary evaluation of patients with high-risk symptoms. R
卵巢癌在美国所有癌症中发病率排名第17位;然而,它是最致命的妇科癌症,也是美国女性癌症相关死亡的第五大常见原因。疾病控制和预防中心资助了美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG),为临床医生制作妇科癌症早期诊断和预防的教育材料。这篇文章是基于ACOG关于卵巢癌早期诊断和预防的大量文献综述的证据总结。从普通妇产科学术专家学会和妇科肿瘤学会招募了一个专家小组来审查和总结2000年1月至2021年10月发表的文章的证据。用于构建文献综述的主题包括卵巢癌的流行病学、风险因素、预防和降低风险、筛查策略和早期发现、健康差异、初级保健提供者的诊断和护理协调以及特殊考虑。卵巢癌证据审查会议于2022年2月举行,专家小组和利益相关者专业组织和患者倡导组织讨论了他们的发现并起草了摘要,以编写教育材料。流行病学回顾显示,2022年有19,880例卵巢癌新病例,12,810名妇女死于卵巢癌,5年生存率为49.7%,与诊断阶段密切相关,不到10%的1期妇女会复发。卵巢癌的危险因素包括年龄较大、缺乏运动、无产、月经初潮早、绝经晚、绝经后激素治疗、BRCA1和BRCA2等基因突变以及子宫内膜异位症。降低风险的双侧输卵管-卵巢切除术可使BRCA1和BRCA2携带者的卵巢癌发病率降低80%(95%可信区间,0.12-0.39),ACOG推荐卵巢癌风险增加的女性接受该手术。避孕、体育活动和哺乳可能有助于降低患卵巢癌的风险。最常用的筛查方法包括经阴道超声检查、双手触诊和测量肿瘤标志物CA-125。卵巢癌风险算法使用CA-125和经阴道超声根据年龄和CA-125的变化来估计卵巢癌的风险;然而,它仍在研究中,没有针对无症状妇女的既定筛查方法。包括ACOG在内的一些组织支持识别高风险妇女并随后提供遗传咨询。卵巢癌的症状是非特异性的,包括腹胀和疼痛,虽然检查应包括超声检查和CA-125测量,但没有高质量的研究比较影像学、生物标志物、风险算法或多模式风险评估工具对高危症状患者的初步评估。在差异方面,黑人女性的结果一直比白人女性差,几乎没有证据表明其他种族和族裔群体或性别少数群体存在差异。最后,护理协调是至关重要的,ACOG建议对怀疑卵巢癌的患者转诊妇科肿瘤科医生的门槛较低,这已被证明可以提高生存率并提供其他优势。本证据综述确定了卵巢癌的许多研究差距和机会,并对卵巢癌的风险分层、诊断和预防方面的当前最佳实践提供了高水平的教育总结。
{"title":"Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference","authors":"William Burke, Joel Barkley, Emily Barrows, Rebecca Brooks, Kimberly Gecsi, Kathryn Huber-Keener, Myrlene Jeudy, Shirley Mei, Julia Sage O’Hara, David Chelmow","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000993692.30944.ce","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000993692.30944.ce","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ovarian cancer has the 17th highest incidence among all cancers in the United States; however, it is the deadliest gynecologic cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) to create educational materials for clinicians on the early diagnosis and prevention of gynecologic cancers. This article is an evidence summary based on ACOG's extensive literature review on the early diagnosis and prevention of ovarian cancer. An expert panel was recruited from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review and summarize evidence from articles published between January 2000 and October 2021. Topics used to frame the literature review included the epidemiology of ovarian cancer, risk factors, prevention and risk reduction, screening strategies and early detection, health disparities, diagnosis and care coordination by primary care providers, and special considerations. The Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference occurred in February 2022 where the expert panel and stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations discussed their findings and drafted summaries to develop educational materials. Review of the epidemiology revealed that in 2022 there were 19,880 new cases of ovarian cancer, 12,810 women died of ovarian cancer, 5-year survival is 49.7% and correlates strongly with stage at diagnosis, and fewer than 10% of women with stage 1 disease will have recurrence. Risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, inactivity, nulliparity, early menarche, late menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy, genetic mutations such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 , and endometriosis. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces incidence of ovarian cancer by 80% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.39) and is recommended by ACOG for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Contraception, physical activity, and lactation may help reduce the risk of ovarian cancer. The most common methods studied for screening include transvaginal ultrasonography, bimanual palpation, and measuring tumor marker CA-125. The Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm uses CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound to estimate the risk of ovarian cancer based on age and change in CA-125; however, it is still being studied, and no established screening method exists for asymptomatic women. Several organizations including ACOG support identifying women at high risk and subsequent genetic counseling. Symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific and include abdominal distention and pain, and while workup should include ultrasonography and CA-125 measurement, no high-quality studies have compared imaging, biomarkers, risk algorithms, or multimodal risk assessment tools for the primary evaluation of patients with high-risk symptoms. R","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136010152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individual and Family Determinants for Quality of Life in Parents of Children With Inborn Errors of Metabolism Requiring a Restricted Diet: A Multilevel Analysis Approach 个体和家庭因素对需要限制饮食的先天性代谢错误儿童父母生活质量的影响:一项多层次分析方法
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000979660.79986.29
Abdoulaye Ouattara, Noemie Resseguier, Aline Cano, Pascale de Lonlay, Jean-Baptiste Arnoux, Anais Brassier, Manuel Schiff, Samia Pichard, Alexandre Fabre, Celia Hoebeke, Nathalie Guffon, Alain Fouilhoux, Pierre Broué, Guy Touati, Dries Dobbelaere, Karine Mention, Francois Labarthe, Marine Tardieu, Loïc de Parscau, Francois Feillet, Chrystele Bonnemains, Alice Kuster, Philippe Labrune, Magalie Barth, Lena Damaj, Delphine Lamireau, Julie Berbis, Pascal Auquier, Brigitte Chabrol
ABSTRACT Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) requiring a restricted diet can have a significant impact on both children and their caregivers. Previous research has shown conflicting findings in the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers specifically, as many factors can influence daily interactions: home care demands, the potential for acute health crises and hospitalization, dietary constraints, medications, and others. Influencing factors have previously been reported to include emotional, adaptive, and socioeconomic factors, and previous research has varied greatly in sample characteristics, methods of collecting data and measuring QoL, and methods of analysis. This study was performed to clarify previous findings and provide a clearer picture of QoL in parents of children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet compared with the general population based on parent self-report. The final analysis included 785 parents of 578 children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet. Quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF and was compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects from the general population. Parents of children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet in this study population experienced a significantly lower QoL in the areas of physical health (mean, −6.09 [SD, 15.01]) and social relationships (mean, −6.82 [SD, 17.71]), as well as a significantly higher QoL in psychological health (mean, +3.10 [SD, 14.25]). Multivariate models were examined to determine factors responsible for these differences in QoL; parental anxiety was negatively associated with all QoL domains. Other factors negatively associated with at least 1 domain included being a father (physical health and social relationships), older parent (physical and psychological health), having an education higher than high school (psychological health), and using more social support–seeking coping strategies (physical health and environment). Factors positively associated with at least 1 domain included having an education level higher than high school (environment), being a working parent (physical and psychological health, environment), and using more positive thinking coping strategies (psychological health). Child-related factors negatively associated with parental QoL included having at least 1 disease complication (social relationships and environment) and a higher number of hospital medical providers (physical health). A child being older positively impacted parental QoL in the environment domain. It is not uncommon for parents of children with chronic diseases or impairments to experience a lower QoL. In this study, some aspects of QoL were enhanced by the demands of caregiving, and some were negatively impacted. Discrepancies in previous literature may be partially attributed to varying tests, variable characteristics within a sample (eg, longer time since diagnosis), or differences in analysis methods. The results in this study indicate a
需要限制饮食的先天性代谢错误(IEMs)可能对儿童及其照顾者产生重大影响。先前的研究在护理人员的生活质量(QoL)方面显示了相互矛盾的发现,因为许多因素会影响日常互动:家庭护理需求,急性健康危机和住院治疗的可能性,饮食限制,药物治疗等。影响因素包括情绪、适应性和社会经济因素,以往的研究在样本特征、收集数据和测量生活质量的方法以及分析方法方面存在很大差异。本研究旨在澄清先前的研究结果,并根据父母的自我报告,对需要限制饮食的IEMs儿童的父母的生活质量与一般人群的生活质量提供更清晰的了解。最终的分析包括785名父母的578名需要限制饮食的IEMs儿童。使用世界卫生组织生活质量(Quality of life - bref)评估生活质量,并与来自一般人群的年龄和性别匹配的对照受试者进行比较。在本研究人群中,需要限制饮食的IEMs儿童的父母在身体健康(平均值,- 6.09 [SD, 15.01])和社会关系(平均值,- 6.82 [SD, 17.71])方面的生活质量显著较低,而在心理健康方面的生活质量显著较高(平均值,+3.10 [SD, 14.25])。我们检验了多变量模型,以确定造成这些生活质量差异的因素;父母焦虑与生活质量各域呈负相关。与至少1个领域负相关的其他因素包括:为人父亲(身体健康和社会关系)、父母年龄较大(身体和心理健康)、受教育程度高于高中(心理健康)以及使用更多寻求社会支持的应对策略(身体健康和环境)。与至少1个领域正相关的因素包括高中以上教育水平(环境)、有工作的父母(身心健康、环境)和使用更积极的思维应对策略(心理健康)。与儿童相关的因素与父母生活质量呈负相关,包括至少有一种疾病并发症(社会关系和环境)和更多的医院医疗服务提供者(身体健康)。孩子年龄的增大对父母的环境生活质量有积极影响。对于患有慢性疾病或损伤的儿童的父母来说,生活质量较低并不罕见。在本研究中,照顾需求对生活质量的某些方面有促进作用,而对某些方面则有负面影响。先前文献的差异可能部分归因于不同的测试,样本内的可变特征(例如,诊断后较长时间)或分析方法的差异。这项研究的结果表明,可能需要资源来支持需要限制饮食的iem儿童的父母。先前的文献显示,提供家庭医疗保健专业人员偶尔减轻父母的照顾责任,以及在类似情况下的父母支持团体的有效性。在所有领域中,父母焦虑都对生活质量产生负面影响,因此,针对减少父母焦虑的干预可能是改善生活质量的一种方法。父母对孩子的状况和照顾需求的适应可以解释生活质量与一般人群的某些方面的差异,但这些差异仍然需要解决,以提高生活质量。
{"title":"Individual and Family Determinants for Quality of Life in Parents of Children With Inborn Errors of Metabolism Requiring a Restricted Diet: A Multilevel Analysis Approach","authors":"Abdoulaye Ouattara, Noemie Resseguier, Aline Cano, Pascale de Lonlay, Jean-Baptiste Arnoux, Anais Brassier, Manuel Schiff, Samia Pichard, Alexandre Fabre, Celia Hoebeke, Nathalie Guffon, Alain Fouilhoux, Pierre Broué, Guy Touati, Dries Dobbelaere, Karine Mention, Francois Labarthe, Marine Tardieu, Loïc de Parscau, Francois Feillet, Chrystele Bonnemains, Alice Kuster, Philippe Labrune, Magalie Barth, Lena Damaj, Delphine Lamireau, Julie Berbis, Pascal Auquier, Brigitte Chabrol","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000979660.79986.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000979660.79986.29","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) requiring a restricted diet can have a significant impact on both children and their caregivers. Previous research has shown conflicting findings in the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers specifically, as many factors can influence daily interactions: home care demands, the potential for acute health crises and hospitalization, dietary constraints, medications, and others. Influencing factors have previously been reported to include emotional, adaptive, and socioeconomic factors, and previous research has varied greatly in sample characteristics, methods of collecting data and measuring QoL, and methods of analysis. This study was performed to clarify previous findings and provide a clearer picture of QoL in parents of children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet compared with the general population based on parent self-report. The final analysis included 785 parents of 578 children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet. Quality of life was assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF and was compared with age- and sex-matched control subjects from the general population. Parents of children with IEMs requiring a restricted diet in this study population experienced a significantly lower QoL in the areas of physical health (mean, −6.09 [SD, 15.01]) and social relationships (mean, −6.82 [SD, 17.71]), as well as a significantly higher QoL in psychological health (mean, +3.10 [SD, 14.25]). Multivariate models were examined to determine factors responsible for these differences in QoL; parental anxiety was negatively associated with all QoL domains. Other factors negatively associated with at least 1 domain included being a father (physical health and social relationships), older parent (physical and psychological health), having an education higher than high school (psychological health), and using more social support–seeking coping strategies (physical health and environment). Factors positively associated with at least 1 domain included having an education level higher than high school (environment), being a working parent (physical and psychological health, environment), and using more positive thinking coping strategies (psychological health). Child-related factors negatively associated with parental QoL included having at least 1 disease complication (social relationships and environment) and a higher number of hospital medical providers (physical health). A child being older positively impacted parental QoL in the environment domain. It is not uncommon for parents of children with chronic diseases or impairments to experience a lower QoL. In this study, some aspects of QoL were enhanced by the demands of caregiving, and some were negatively impacted. Discrepancies in previous literature may be partially attributed to varying tests, variable characteristics within a sample (eg, longer time since diagnosis), or differences in analysis methods. The results in this study indicate a","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changing Practices in the Surgical Management of Adnexal Torsion: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database 附件扭转手术治疗方法的改变:国家外科质量改进计划数据库的分析
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001195
Hannah T. Ryles, Christopher X. Hong, Uduak U. Andy, Monique R. Farrow
ABSTRACT Ovarian torsion occurs when the ovary twists on its own supporting ligaments, resulting in ischemia and possible necrosis. This is a surgical emergency to restore adnexal perfusion, and even in the setting of a necrotic-appearing ovary, conservative management with detorsion alone does not increase postoperative complications compared with oophorectomy. Traditionally, oophorectomy was performed in these cases, and despite the new evidence supporting ovarian conservation, oophorectomy remains common. Despite updated guidelines by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) in 2016, it is unclear to what extent practice patterns have changed in the years since. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe the trend in surgical management of ovarian torsion between 2008 and 2020 and to describe the changes in management before and after the publication of the updated ACOG guidelines. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify women aged 18 to 50 years who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion between 2008 and 2020. Patients were classified as having undergone oophorectomy or ovarian conservation using ICD codes, and patients undergoing concurrent surgeries or procedures related to pregnancy or unrelated to adnexal torsion were excluded. Patients were then grouped into pre-ACOG guidelines (2008–2016) and post-ACOG guidelines (2017–2020). Patient demographics, clinical data, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day postoperative adverse events were queried and compared between year cohorts and surgical management groups. The primary outcome was proportion of oophorectomies, described as the number of oophorectomies over the total number of all torsion surgeries per year, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine the odds of oophorectomy versus ovarian conservation between year cohorts while controlling for confounders. A total of 1791 patients were included in this study, with 402 (22.4%) in the 2008–2016 cohort and 1389 (77.6%) in the 2017–2020 cohort. Across both groups, 542 patients (30.3%) underwent ovarian conservation, and 1249 (69.7%) underwent oophorectomy. The overall proportion of oophorectomies was similar between the 2008–2016 and 2017–2020 cohorts (71.9% vs 69.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71–1.25). When evaluating the effects of time on odds of oophorectomy, a significant decrease in the odds of oophorectomy performed successively each year over the entire study period was found (average decrease, −1.6%/year; 95% CI, −3.0% to −0.22%), although the yearly successive decrease in the odds of oophorectomy remained similar before and after 2017. The median hospital length of stay was longer, and the hospital admission rates were high in the oophorectomy group compared with the ovarian conservation group. The results of this study demonstrate that 69.7% of surgeries for a
卵巢扭转发生在卵巢自身的支撑韧带扭曲时,导致缺血和可能的坏死。这是一种恢复附件灌注的紧急手术,即使在出现坏死的卵巢的情况下,与卵巢切除术相比,仅采用扭曲的保守治疗不会增加术后并发症。传统上,在这些情况下进行卵巢切除术,尽管新的证据支持卵巢保护,卵巢切除术仍然很常见。尽管美国妇产科学会(ACOG)在2016年更新了指导方针,但尚不清楚自那以后的几年里,实践模式发生了多大程度的变化。本回顾性队列研究旨在描述2008年至2020年间卵巢扭转手术治疗的趋势,并描述更新的ACOG指南发布前后治疗的变化。美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库用于识别2008年至2020年期间接受附件扭转手术的18至50岁女性。使用ICD编码将患者分类为接受过卵巢切除术或卵巢保护的患者,排除同时接受手术或与妊娠相关或与附件扭转无关的手术的患者。然后将患者分为前acog指南(2008-2016)和后acog指南(2017-2020)。对患者人口统计学、临床资料、围手术期特征和术后30天不良事件进行查询和比较。主要结局是卵巢切除术的比例,描述为卵巢切除术的数量超过每年所有扭转手术的总数,置信区间为95% (CI)。在控制混杂因素的情况下,进行多变量回归分析以确定年度队列中卵巢切除与卵巢保留的几率。本研究共纳入1791例患者,其中2008-2016年队列402例(22.4%),2017-2020年队列1389例(77.6%)。在两组中,542例(30.3%)患者接受了卵巢保护,1249例(69.7%)患者接受了卵巢切除术。2008-2016年和2017-2020年队列中卵巢切除术的总体比例相似(71.9% vs 69.1%;校正优势比为0.94;95% ci, 0.71-1.25)。在评估时间对卵巢切除几率的影响时,发现在整个研究期间,每年连续进行卵巢切除的几率显著下降(平均下降- 1.6%/年;95% CI, - 3.0%至- 0.22%),尽管2017年前后卵巢切除术几率的年连续下降保持相似。与保留卵巢组相比,卵巢切除术组的住院时间中位数更长,住院率较高。本研究的结果表明,69.7%的附件扭转手术涉及卵巢切除术,而不是保守治疗,尽管在研究期间观察到一个适度的统计趋势,即卵巢切除术减少。在ACOG推荐卵巢保护的指南发表前后,没有观察到卵巢切除术与卵巢保护的趋势有明显的影响。
{"title":"Changing Practices in the Surgical Management of Adnexal Torsion: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database","authors":"Hannah T. Ryles, Christopher X. Hong, Uduak U. Andy, Monique R. Farrow","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001195","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ovarian torsion occurs when the ovary twists on its own supporting ligaments, resulting in ischemia and possible necrosis. This is a surgical emergency to restore adnexal perfusion, and even in the setting of a necrotic-appearing ovary, conservative management with detorsion alone does not increase postoperative complications compared with oophorectomy. Traditionally, oophorectomy was performed in these cases, and despite the new evidence supporting ovarian conservation, oophorectomy remains common. Despite updated guidelines by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) in 2016, it is unclear to what extent practice patterns have changed in the years since. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe the trend in surgical management of ovarian torsion between 2008 and 2020 and to describe the changes in management before and after the publication of the updated ACOG guidelines. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify women aged 18 to 50 years who underwent surgery for adnexal torsion between 2008 and 2020. Patients were classified as having undergone oophorectomy or ovarian conservation using ICD codes, and patients undergoing concurrent surgeries or procedures related to pregnancy or unrelated to adnexal torsion were excluded. Patients were then grouped into pre-ACOG guidelines (2008–2016) and post-ACOG guidelines (2017–2020). Patient demographics, clinical data, perioperative characteristics, and 30-day postoperative adverse events were queried and compared between year cohorts and surgical management groups. The primary outcome was proportion of oophorectomies, described as the number of oophorectomies over the total number of all torsion surgeries per year, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine the odds of oophorectomy versus ovarian conservation between year cohorts while controlling for confounders. A total of 1791 patients were included in this study, with 402 (22.4%) in the 2008–2016 cohort and 1389 (77.6%) in the 2017–2020 cohort. Across both groups, 542 patients (30.3%) underwent ovarian conservation, and 1249 (69.7%) underwent oophorectomy. The overall proportion of oophorectomies was similar between the 2008–2016 and 2017–2020 cohorts (71.9% vs 69.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71–1.25). When evaluating the effects of time on odds of oophorectomy, a significant decrease in the odds of oophorectomy performed successively each year over the entire study period was found (average decrease, −1.6%/year; 95% CI, −3.0% to −0.22%), although the yearly successive decrease in the odds of oophorectomy remained similar before and after 2017. The median hospital length of stay was longer, and the hospital admission rates were high in the oophorectomy group compared with the ovarian conservation group. The results of this study demonstrate that 69.7% of surgeries for a","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Health Care Utilization and Feasibility of Transurethral Catheter Self-Discontinuation 评估经尿道导管自我停置的医疗保健应用及可行性
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001201
Abigail Davenport, Yi Li, Emily Melvin, Arthur Arcaz, Lucie Lefbom, Cheryl B. Iglesia, Alexis A. Dieter
ABSTRACT Common issues after pelvic reconstructive surgery are incomplete bladder emptying and urinary retention, often resulting in placement of an indwelling transurethral Foley catheter, which then remains until a patient returns to the office. Catheterization is significantly distressing for women undergoing these procedures and burdensome due to travel to the office during the postoperative period. In addition, in-office voiding trials add to the workload of health care professionals and staff. A potential alternative is at-home self-discontinuation of the Foley catheter. This study's primary aim was the comparison of the rates of health care utilization (calls, messages, office visits, and emergency department [ED] visits) and postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery among patients with voiding trials on the day of surgery, versus those with Foley placement and void trials on postoperative day 1. Secondary objectives included identifying risk factors for unsuccessful voiding trials and exploring any complications associated with catheter self-discontinuation. This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study at 1 academic institution and included outpatient women undergoing outpatient urogynecologic or minimally invasive gynecological surgery for benign indications between August 2021 and January 2022. Qualifying patients included cisgendered English-speaking women of at least 18 years of age who exhibited postoperative urinary retention on the day of surgery. Excluded were patients with any preoperative degree of urinary retention (defined as any observation of a postvoid residual more than 200 mL), known upper motor neuron disease, and patients undergoing surgeries with concomitant extra pelvic procedures or minor procedures not requiring a postoperative voiding trial. Based on the exploratory nature of this study, primarily for determining safety and feasibility, the convenience sample size of 50 was set, and patients were recruited at the time of their unsuccessful voiding trials on the day of surgery. On the day of surgery, medical staff performed voiding trials in the postoperative anesthesia care unit, backfilling the bladder with 200 mL of sterile fluid. The void trial was successful if this was followed by a patient void of at least 150–200 mL, otherwise the voiding trial was marked as unsuccessful. Unsuccessful trials resulted in the insertion of an indwelling Foley catheter, followed by verbal and written instruction for performing a home-based, patient-led catheter self-discontinuation at 6:00 am on postoperative day 1. Instructions for catheter removal included pictures and written information. After removal, if the patient failed to void 150 mL within 6 hours, they were instructed to return to the office for additional care. Perioperative data collected from charts included age, parity, body mass index, self-reported race, surgical location, smoking status, periprocedural antibiotics, operative i
盆腔重建术后的常见问题是膀胱排空不完全和尿潴留,通常导致留置经尿道Foley导尿管,直到患者返回办公室。导尿对于接受这些手术的妇女来说是非常痛苦的,并且由于在术后期间要去办公室,因此负担很大。此外,办公室内的排尿试验增加了卫生保健专业人员和工作人员的工作量。一个潜在的替代方案是在家自行停用Foley导尿管。本研究的主要目的是比较在手术当天进行排尿试验的患者与在术后第1天进行Foley放置和排尿试验的患者在手术30天内的医疗保健利用率(电话、信息、办公室就诊和急诊科就诊)和术后并发症。次要目的包括确定不成功的排尿试验的危险因素和探索与导管自行停置相关的任何并发症。本研究设计为一项前瞻性观察队列研究,在1个学术机构进行,包括在2021年8月至2022年1月期间因良性适应症接受门诊泌尿妇科或微创妇科手术的门诊妇女。符合条件的患者包括在手术当天出现术后尿潴留的18岁以上说英语的顺性别女性。排除术前任何程度的尿潴留(定义为任何观察到的尿后残留超过200 mL),已知的上运动神经元疾病,以及伴有盆腔外手术或不需要术后排尿试验的小手术的患者。基于本研究的探索性,主要是为了确定安全性和可行性,设置了50例方便样本量,并在手术当天排尿试验失败的时间招募患者。手术当天,医护人员在术后麻醉护理病房进行了排尿试验,用200 mL无菌液体回填膀胱。如果排空试验之后患者排空至少150-200 mL,则排空试验成功,否则排空试验被标记为不成功。不成功的试验导致留置Foley导尿管的插入,随后口头和书面指示在术后第1天早上6:00进行以家庭为基础的、患者主导的导尿管自我停置。导管拔除说明包括图片和文字信息。移除后,如果患者未能在6小时内排出150ml,他们被指示返回办公室接受额外的护理。从图表中收集的围手术期数据包括年龄、胎次、体重指数、自我报告的种族、手术部位、吸烟状况、围手术期抗生素、手术指征、手术程序、手术时间、外科医生类型、麻醉类型、估计失血量和术中并发症。研究结果显示,140例患者符合术后第0天排尿试验的条件。在这些患者中,大多数是绝经后,怀特,三分之一的人肥胖。大多数患者(82.8%)由泌尿妇科医生进行手术,手术当天的总体排尿试验失败率为35.7%。大多数患者(48/50)根据方案进行了家庭排尿试验。其中39例没有进一步的排尿困难。在需要额外评估的9/50(18.8%)患者中,6例在办公室进行了重复无效试验,其中4例成功,1例在办公室自行排尿,1例需要长时间清洁间歇自我导尿,1例在术后第3天重复Foley自我停药成功。39例术后第1天成功自行停药的患者中,只有2例出现潴留,1例出现在急诊科,1例出现在办公室。术后第0天无效试验不成功的患者平均有1次额外的电话或信息到办公室,术后第1天无效试验不成功的患者平均有1次额外的办公室访问。虽然这些与成功的手术日无效试验的比较具有统计学意义,但它们并不表明过度的护理需求。手术当日无效试验失败的危险因素包括年龄较大(也是第二天失败的危险因素)、吸烟史和阴道子宫切除术。该研究的优势包括其接受各种微创妇科和泌尿妇科手术的不同女性人群,以及其前瞻性。 该研究的局限性包括缺乏对照组,研究进行的机构单一,样本量小,限制了罕见并发症的潜在识别。这些因素也限制了研究结果在其他情况下的普遍性。最终,对患者和办公室工作人员来说,导管自行停置在很大程度上是直接和有效的,后续留置率低。虽然需要进一步的研究,但目前的数据表明,对于接受高级妇科手术的女性来说,导管自我停置是一种安全可行的选择,为急性术后排尿功能障碍提供了一种有价值的管理选择。
{"title":"Assessing Health Care Utilization and Feasibility of Transurethral Catheter Self-Discontinuation","authors":"Abigail Davenport, Yi Li, Emily Melvin, Arthur Arcaz, Lucie Lefbom, Cheryl B. Iglesia, Alexis A. Dieter","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001201","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Common issues after pelvic reconstructive surgery are incomplete bladder emptying and urinary retention, often resulting in placement of an indwelling transurethral Foley catheter, which then remains until a patient returns to the office. Catheterization is significantly distressing for women undergoing these procedures and burdensome due to travel to the office during the postoperative period. In addition, in-office voiding trials add to the workload of health care professionals and staff. A potential alternative is at-home self-discontinuation of the Foley catheter. This study's primary aim was the comparison of the rates of health care utilization (calls, messages, office visits, and emergency department [ED] visits) and postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery among patients with voiding trials on the day of surgery, versus those with Foley placement and void trials on postoperative day 1. Secondary objectives included identifying risk factors for unsuccessful voiding trials and exploring any complications associated with catheter self-discontinuation. This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study at 1 academic institution and included outpatient women undergoing outpatient urogynecologic or minimally invasive gynecological surgery for benign indications between August 2021 and January 2022. Qualifying patients included cisgendered English-speaking women of at least 18 years of age who exhibited postoperative urinary retention on the day of surgery. Excluded were patients with any preoperative degree of urinary retention (defined as any observation of a postvoid residual more than 200 mL), known upper motor neuron disease, and patients undergoing surgeries with concomitant extra pelvic procedures or minor procedures not requiring a postoperative voiding trial. Based on the exploratory nature of this study, primarily for determining safety and feasibility, the convenience sample size of 50 was set, and patients were recruited at the time of their unsuccessful voiding trials on the day of surgery. On the day of surgery, medical staff performed voiding trials in the postoperative anesthesia care unit, backfilling the bladder with 200 mL of sterile fluid. The void trial was successful if this was followed by a patient void of at least 150–200 mL, otherwise the voiding trial was marked as unsuccessful. Unsuccessful trials resulted in the insertion of an indwelling Foley catheter, followed by verbal and written instruction for performing a home-based, patient-led catheter self-discontinuation at 6:00 am on postoperative day 1. Instructions for catheter removal included pictures and written information. After removal, if the patient failed to void 150 mL within 6 hours, they were instructed to return to the office for additional care. Perioperative data collected from charts included age, parity, body mass index, self-reported race, surgical location, smoking status, periprocedural antibiotics, operative i","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cesarean Delivery Trends Among Patients at Low Risk for Cesarean Delivery in the US, 2000–2019 2000-2019年美国低风险剖宫产患者剖宫产趋势
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000979652.08372.3b
Anna M. Frappaolo, Teresa C. Logue, Dena Goffman, Lisa M. Nathan, Jean-Ju Sheen, Maria Andrikopoulou, Timothy Wen, Mary E. D'Alton, Alexander M. Friedman
ABSTRACT Cesarean delivery is a method of improving outcomes for both mothers and neonates when there are medical complications to vaginal delivery. When used unnecessarily, however, it causes increased risks for adverse outcomes as a major surgery. Limited data and investigations have prevented some previous analyses of trends in cesarean deliveries, especially when classifying them as necessary or unnecessary. This study was designed to determine temporal trends in cesarean deliveries among low-risk patients over a 20-year period and to analyze trends in specific cesarean delivery indications. This study was designed as a repeated cross-sectional analysis among patients at low risk for cesarean delivery. The authors utilized the National Inpatient Sample data set, and then patients with conditions previously associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (eg, obesity) were excluded. Primary outcomes included temporal trends in the number of cesarean deliveries, as well as trends related to diagnoses of nonreassuring fetal status, labor arrest, or obstructed labor (including disproportion). Between 2000 and 2019, 40,517,867 eligible low-risk deliveries were identified. Of these, 4,885,716 were cesarean deliveries. The overall rate of cesarean delivery increased between 2000 and 2009 (from 9.7% to 13.9%) and then decreased between 2012 and 2019 (from 13% to 11.1%). The average annual percentage change (AAPC) from 2000 to 2005 was 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2%–7.6%), with a plateau from 2005 to 2009 (AAPC, 1.2%; 95% CI, −1.2% to 3.7%) and then a decrease from 2009 to 2019 (AAPC, −2.2%; 95% CI, −2.7% to −1.8%). Deliveries associated with the diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status increased between 2000 and 2019 (AAPC, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%–2.5%); those associated with labor arrest peaked in 2009 at 4.8% and then decreased to 2.7% in 2019 (AAPC 2009–2019, −5.6%; 95% CI, −6.6% to −4.6%). In contrast, cesarean deliveries due to obstructed labor continuously decreased from 2000 to 2019 (AAPC, −8.6%; 95% CI, −10.0% to −7.1%). After accounting for demographic and hospital characteristics, analysis showed that patients were at increased risk of cesarean delivery if they were between 35 and 39 years of age compared with the younger group of 25 to 29 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25–1.28), if they delivered at a hospital in the South versus the Northeast (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07–1.15), and if they were non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20–1.25). Overall trends showed increasing rates of cesarean delivery in the first 10 years of the study, but then decreasing rates for the final 10 years. Rates associated with diagnoses of nonreassuring fetal status increased over the study period, and those associated with labor arrest or obstruction decreased. The increase of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal status when compared with the overall trend of decreasing cesarean deliveries indica
剖宫产是一种改善产妇和新生儿结局的方法,当有医学并发症的阴道分娩。然而,当不必要地使用时,作为一项大手术,它会增加不良后果的风险。有限的数据和调查妨碍了以前对剖宫产趋势的一些分析,特别是在将剖宫产分类为必要或不必要时。本研究旨在确定低风险患者20年来剖宫产的时间趋势,并分析特定剖宫产指征的趋势。本研究旨在对低风险剖宫产患者进行重复横断面分析。作者使用了全国住院病人样本数据集,然后排除了先前与剖宫产风险增加相关的患者(例如肥胖)。主要结局包括剖宫产数量的时间趋势,以及与不可靠胎儿状态、分娩骤停或难产(包括比例失调)诊断相关的趋势。2000年至2019年期间,确定了40,517,867例符合条件的低风险分娩。其中,4,885,716例为剖宫产。剖宫产的总体率在2000年至2009年期间有所上升(从9.7%上升到13.9%),然后在2012年至2019年期间有所下降(从13%下降到11.1%)。2000 - 2005年平均年变化百分比(AAPC)为6.4%(95%可信区间[CI], 5.2%-7.6%), 2005 - 2009年为平台期(AAPC, 1.2%;95% CI, - 1.2%至3.7%),然后从2009年到2019年下降(AAPC, - 2.2%;95% CI,−2.7% ~−1.8%)。2000年至2019年期间,与胎儿状态不稳定诊断相关的分娩增加了(AAPC, 2.1%;95% ci, 1.7%-2.5%);与劳动逮捕相关的人数在2009年达到4.8%的峰值,然后在2019年降至2.7% (AAPC 2009 - 2019, - 5.6%;95% CI, - 6.6%至- 4.6%)。相比之下,2000年至2019年,难产导致的剖宫产持续下降(AAPC, - 8.6%;95% CI,−10.0% ~−7.1%)。在考虑了人口统计学和医院特征后,分析显示35 - 39岁的患者与25 - 29岁的年轻组相比,剖宫产的风险增加(校正优势比[aOR], 1.27;95% CI, 1.25-1.28),如果他们在南方的医院分娩而不是在东北部的医院分娩(aOR, 1.11;95% CI, 1.07-1.15),如果是非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人(aOR, 1.23;95% ci, 1.20-1.25)。总体趋势显示,在研究的前10年,剖宫产率上升,但在研究的后10年,剖宫产率下降。在研究期间,与诊断为胎儿状态不稳定相关的比率增加了,而与分娩骤停或梗阻相关的比率下降了。与剖宫产减少的总体趋势相比,由于胎儿状态不稳定导致剖宫产的增加表明可能存在临床疏忽,因为对胎儿状态不稳定的解释可能因提供者和设施而异。一些指导方针是用来确定不可靠的胎儿状态的,但是对指导方针的解释,有时指导方针本身在研究期间发生了变化。这一增加可能是由于所需经费或对这些经费的解释发生了变化,应当进行更充分的调查。未来的研究应该集中在更准确地识别不可靠胎儿状态的诊断,以减少不必要的剖宫产的数量,同时改善那些真正需要剖宫产的结果。
{"title":"Cesarean Delivery Trends Among Patients at Low Risk for Cesarean Delivery in the US, 2000–2019","authors":"Anna M. Frappaolo, Teresa C. Logue, Dena Goffman, Lisa M. Nathan, Jean-Ju Sheen, Maria Andrikopoulou, Timothy Wen, Mary E. D'Alton, Alexander M. Friedman","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000979652.08372.3b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000979652.08372.3b","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cesarean delivery is a method of improving outcomes for both mothers and neonates when there are medical complications to vaginal delivery. When used unnecessarily, however, it causes increased risks for adverse outcomes as a major surgery. Limited data and investigations have prevented some previous analyses of trends in cesarean deliveries, especially when classifying them as necessary or unnecessary. This study was designed to determine temporal trends in cesarean deliveries among low-risk patients over a 20-year period and to analyze trends in specific cesarean delivery indications. This study was designed as a repeated cross-sectional analysis among patients at low risk for cesarean delivery. The authors utilized the National Inpatient Sample data set, and then patients with conditions previously associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery (eg, obesity) were excluded. Primary outcomes included temporal trends in the number of cesarean deliveries, as well as trends related to diagnoses of nonreassuring fetal status, labor arrest, or obstructed labor (including disproportion). Between 2000 and 2019, 40,517,867 eligible low-risk deliveries were identified. Of these, 4,885,716 were cesarean deliveries. The overall rate of cesarean delivery increased between 2000 and 2009 (from 9.7% to 13.9%) and then decreased between 2012 and 2019 (from 13% to 11.1%). The average annual percentage change (AAPC) from 2000 to 2005 was 6.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2%–7.6%), with a plateau from 2005 to 2009 (AAPC, 1.2%; 95% CI, −1.2% to 3.7%) and then a decrease from 2009 to 2019 (AAPC, −2.2%; 95% CI, −2.7% to −1.8%). Deliveries associated with the diagnosis of nonreassuring fetal status increased between 2000 and 2019 (AAPC, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%–2.5%); those associated with labor arrest peaked in 2009 at 4.8% and then decreased to 2.7% in 2019 (AAPC 2009–2019, −5.6%; 95% CI, −6.6% to −4.6%). In contrast, cesarean deliveries due to obstructed labor continuously decreased from 2000 to 2019 (AAPC, −8.6%; 95% CI, −10.0% to −7.1%). After accounting for demographic and hospital characteristics, analysis showed that patients were at increased risk of cesarean delivery if they were between 35 and 39 years of age compared with the younger group of 25 to 29 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25–1.28), if they delivered at a hospital in the South versus the Northeast (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07–1.15), and if they were non-Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20–1.25). Overall trends showed increasing rates of cesarean delivery in the first 10 years of the study, but then decreasing rates for the final 10 years. Rates associated with diagnoses of nonreassuring fetal status increased over the study period, and those associated with labor arrest or obstruction decreased. The increase of cesarean delivery due to nonreassuring fetal status when compared with the overall trend of decreasing cesarean deliveries indica","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery 骶棘固定和阴道子宫骶悬吊-子宫保留手术的评价
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001200
Katherine L. Woodburn, Angela S. Yuan, Michele Torosis, Kasey Roberts, Cecile A. Ferrando, Robert E. Gutman
ABSTRACT Although hysterectomy is traditionally performed at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair for apical prolapse, women are increasingly interested in uterine preservation during pelvic organ prolapse surgical management. Approximately 36% to 60% of women indicate interest in uterine preservation, assuming equal efficacy. This has led to more uterus-preserving prolapse repairs (hysteropexy) being performed. After the removal of mesh products from the US market in 2019, transvaginal native tissue techniques are commonly used for hysteropexy. This study aimed to compare 6-week and 1-year anatomical failure rates between vaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy. Secondary outcomes included retreatment for prolapse, symptoms of recurrent prolapse, and perioperative adverse event rates in these 2 groups. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing vaginal uterosacral hysteropexy (USHP) or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) with a urogynecologist between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The pool of patient data was extrapolated from 4 geographically unique urban locations. Patient identification took place via querying the respective electronic medical records for the current procedural terminology codes of extraperitoneal colpopexy (57,282, SSHP) and intraperitoneal colpopexy (57,283, USHP). These operative reports underwent review in order to confirm that each patient had a uterus at time of surgery, underwent either USHP or SSHP, and did not undergo concurrent hysterectomy. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing different types of uterine-preserving procedures or patients with less than 6 weeks of follow-up. The study included 147 patients undergoing SSHP and 114 having USHP over 5 years at the 4 clinical sites. The study population included mostly nonsmoking (179, 68.6%), White (224, 85.5%) patients with no history of pelvic surgery (142, 54.4%), and a mean Charleston Comorbidity Index score of 2. Overall, USHP patients exhibited a higher likelihood to undergo concurrent anterior repair, posterior repair, and incontinence procedures. The follow-up rate was 95% at 6 postoperative weeks with 4 anatomic failures. Not all patients had formal prolapse quantitation examinations recorded. However, only 32% (83/261) of patients were available for follow-up at 1 year after surgery when 10 patients met criteria for anatomic failure. Notably, although there was no statistically significant difference between failure rates for SSHP and USHP at either time point, there were roughly 3 times as many failures for USHP compared with SSHP, despite the SSHP representing a larger portion of the total cohort. At 1 year, however, 26 patients had undergone retreatment for prolapse, with 12 undergoing hysterectomy (11 due to prolapse, 1 due to colorectal cancer debulking). Of those undergoing hysterectomy, 10 were from the SSHP cohort, whereas 1 was from the USHP cohort. The 1 year ana
虽然子宫切除术传统上是在盆腔器官脱垂修复根尖脱垂时进行的,但女性在盆腔器官脱垂手术治疗中越来越关注子宫保留。大约36%到60%的女性表示对子宫保存感兴趣,假设效果相同。这导致更多的保留子宫脱垂修复(子宫切除术)被执行。在2019年网状产品从美国市场下架后,经阴道原生组织技术通常用于子宫切除术。本研究旨在比较阴道子宫骶韧带宫内固定术和骶棘韧带宫内固定术在6周和1年内的解剖失败率。次要结局包括脱垂的再治疗、复发性脱垂的症状和两组患者围手术期不良事件发生率。这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在2015年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间在泌尿妇科医生处接受阴道子宫骶部子宫切除术(USHP)或骶棘部子宫切除术(SSHP)的患者。患者数据池是从4个地理上独特的城市地点推断出来的。通过查询各自的电子病历来确定患者身份,以获得腹膜外阴道灌封术(57,282,SSHP)和腹膜内阴道灌封术(57,283,USHP)的现行程序术语代码。对这些手术报告进行了回顾,以确认每位患者在手术时都有子宫,接受了USHP或SSHP,并且没有同时进行子宫切除术。排除标准包括接受不同类型子宫保留手术的患者或随访时间少于6周的患者。该研究包括4个临床地点的147例SSHP患者和114例USHP患者,时间超过5年。研究人群主要包括不吸烟(179例,68.6%)、无盆腔手术史的White(224例,85.5%)患者(142例,54.4%),平均查尔斯顿合并症指数评分为2分。总的来说,USHP患者更有可能同时进行前路修复、后路修复和尿失禁手术。术后6周随访率95%,解剖失败4例。并非所有患者均有正式的脱垂定量检查记录。然而,只有32%(83/261)的患者在术后1年随访,其中10例患者符合解剖衰竭标准。值得注意的是,尽管在任何一个时间点,SSHP和USHP的失败率没有统计学上的显著差异,但USHP的失败率大约是SSHP的3倍,尽管SSHP在整个队列中占更大的比例。然而,1年后,26例患者因脱垂再次接受治疗,其中12例接受子宫切除术(11例因脱垂,1例因结直肠癌减积)。在接受子宫切除术的患者中,10例来自SSHP组,1例来自USHP组。1年的解剖结果可能包括这些挽救性手术后的脱垂评估。阴道原生组织子宫切除术一年后,只有1 / 3的患者可以随访,但这个有限的队列显示SSHP和UHSP在脱垂复发方面没有差异。不良事件发生率低,只有5%的患者因脱垂而接受子宫切除术。下一步的研究应该包括更严格的前瞻性试验。
{"title":"Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery","authors":"Katherine L. Woodburn, Angela S. Yuan, Michele Torosis, Kasey Roberts, Cecile A. Ferrando, Robert E. Gutman","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001200","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although hysterectomy is traditionally performed at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair for apical prolapse, women are increasingly interested in uterine preservation during pelvic organ prolapse surgical management. Approximately 36% to 60% of women indicate interest in uterine preservation, assuming equal efficacy. This has led to more uterus-preserving prolapse repairs (hysteropexy) being performed. After the removal of mesh products from the US market in 2019, transvaginal native tissue techniques are commonly used for hysteropexy. This study aimed to compare 6-week and 1-year anatomical failure rates between vaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy and sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy. Secondary outcomes included retreatment for prolapse, symptoms of recurrent prolapse, and perioperative adverse event rates in these 2 groups. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing vaginal uterosacral hysteropexy (USHP) or sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSHP) with a urogynecologist between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. The pool of patient data was extrapolated from 4 geographically unique urban locations. Patient identification took place via querying the respective electronic medical records for the current procedural terminology codes of extraperitoneal colpopexy (57,282, SSHP) and intraperitoneal colpopexy (57,283, USHP). These operative reports underwent review in order to confirm that each patient had a uterus at time of surgery, underwent either USHP or SSHP, and did not undergo concurrent hysterectomy. Exclusion criteria included patients undergoing different types of uterine-preserving procedures or patients with less than 6 weeks of follow-up. The study included 147 patients undergoing SSHP and 114 having USHP over 5 years at the 4 clinical sites. The study population included mostly nonsmoking (179, 68.6%), White (224, 85.5%) patients with no history of pelvic surgery (142, 54.4%), and a mean Charleston Comorbidity Index score of 2. Overall, USHP patients exhibited a higher likelihood to undergo concurrent anterior repair, posterior repair, and incontinence procedures. The follow-up rate was 95% at 6 postoperative weeks with 4 anatomic failures. Not all patients had formal prolapse quantitation examinations recorded. However, only 32% (83/261) of patients were available for follow-up at 1 year after surgery when 10 patients met criteria for anatomic failure. Notably, although there was no statistically significant difference between failure rates for SSHP and USHP at either time point, there were roughly 3 times as many failures for USHP compared with SSHP, despite the SSHP representing a larger portion of the total cohort. At 1 year, however, 26 patients had undergone retreatment for prolapse, with 12 undergoing hysterectomy (11 due to prolapse, 1 due to colorectal cancer debulking). Of those undergoing hysterectomy, 10 were from the SSHP cohort, whereas 1 was from the USHP cohort. The 1 year ana","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vaginal Vault Infiltration With Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Control Trial 阴道穹窿浸润布比卡因用于腹腔镜子宫全切除术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001194
Kallol Kumar Roy, Poojitha Kalyani Kanikaram, Nilanchali Singh, Vimi Riwari, Rinchen Zangmo, Jyoti Meena, Anamika Das, Deepika Kashyap, Archana Minz
ABSTRACT A viable alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy is total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), which offers abdominal route advantages for women in need of total hysterectomy for benign diseases. Fewer complications, faster recovery, and less pain are ensured by laparoscopy, although this method is not entirely devoid of pain. Reports from various authors indicate that up to 80% of laparoscopic surgery patients require opioid analgesia, which could increase hospital-stay duration and delay mobilization/recovery. Because of these statistics, opioid analgesic usages ought to be minimized, for the aforementioned reasons and also to prevent additional adverse effects. This study was performed to evaluate efficacy of reducing postoperative pain by infiltration of bupivacaine, a long-acting anesthetic agent, into the vaginal vault after TLH. This study was a randomized control trial designed as a 2-arm double-blinded study conducted at a North-Indian Apical Center in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. After written informed consent from all patients, computer-generated randomization software placed them in 1 of 2 groups: group 1, the intervention group (received the infiltration of bupivacaine in the vaginal vault following TLH), or group 2 (the control group). The inclusion criteria were a uterine size of ≤12 weeks' pregnancy and patients requiring TLH with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine size and benign conditions. Exclusion criteria were contraindication to any medication used by the study, presence of malignancy, history of multiple surgeries, and history of inflammatory disease. Postoperative pain outcome measured in both groups at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours via a visual analog score was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the need for rescue analgesia. A complete profile of each patient was created, using eligibility criteria, body mass index, and demographic profile, and a complete gynecological and physical examination was performed, along with preoperative investigations for fitness to general anesthesia. Per standard protocol, general anesthesia was administered for all surgeries. After vault closure, a fine-tipped aspiration needle was used to administer 10 mL of bupivacaine, which was infiltrated laparoscopically at 2 different locations, approximately 2–4 cm apart. The control group omitted this step. In the first 24 hours after operation, pain was treated using 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 hours. For the next 5 days, patients were given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (diclofenac) 3 times daily for 5 days. Participants scaled their pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) score at the 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours intervals postsurgery. Scores greater than 4 initiated the distribution of tramadol 50 mg intramuscular. Also recorded were the uterine weight, the operative time, complications, and the amount of operative bleeding. Group 1 patients exhibited VAS scores of less than 4
全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)是一种可行的替代全腹子宫切除术的方法,它为良性疾病需要全子宫切除术的妇女提供了腹部途径的优势。腹腔镜手术并发症少,恢复快,疼痛少,尽管这种方法并非完全没有疼痛。来自不同作者的报告表明,高达80%的腹腔镜手术患者需要阿片类镇痛药,这可能会增加住院时间并延迟活动/恢复。由于这些统计数据,阿片类镇痛药的使用应该尽量减少,出于上述原因,也为了防止额外的不良反应。本研究旨在评估布比卡因(一种长效麻醉剂)在TLH后阴道穹窿内浸润减轻术后疼痛的效果。本研究是一项随机对照试验,设计为两组双盲研究,在北印度妇产科顶点中心进行。在获得所有患者的书面知情同意后,计算机生成的随机化软件将他们分为两组:1组,干预组(TLH后阴道穹窿浸润布比卡因)或2组(对照组)。纳入标准为:子宫大小≤12周,子宫大小及良性情况需要行双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的TLH患者。排除标准为研究中使用的任何药物禁忌症、存在恶性肿瘤、多次手术史和炎症性疾病史。术后1、3、6、12和24小时通过视觉模拟评分测量两组的疼痛结局是主要结局。次要结果为是否需要抢救性镇痛。使用资格标准、体重指数和人口统计资料,对每位患者进行了完整的概况,并进行了完整的妇科和体格检查,以及术前对全身麻醉的适应性调查。按照标准方案,所有手术均采用全身麻醉。闭合穹窿后,使用细尖抽吸针给药10ml布比卡因,在腹腔镜下浸润2个不同的位置,间隔约2 - 4 cm。对照组省略了这一步。术后24小时内,每6小时静脉注射扑热息痛1 g。在接下来的5天,患者给予非甾体抗炎药(双氯芬酸),每天3次,连续5天。参与者在术后1、2、6、12和24小时间隔使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评分。评分大于4分开始曲马多50mg肌内注射。同时记录子宫重量、手术时间、并发症及术中出血量。组1患者术后1小时(100%)、3小时(100%)、6小时(97%)、12小时(96.7%)、24小时(36.7%)VAS评分均小于4分。对照组VAS评分低于4分的分别为:1小时(93%)、3小时(86.6%)、6小时(30%)、12小时(10%)、24小时(3.3%)。从这些数据可以清楚地看出,局部镇痛的浸润在减轻术后疼痛方面是有效的。总的来说,局部麻醉阴道袖口浸润是一种可行且安全的术后疼痛缓解方法。由于10ml 0.25%布比卡因浸润阴道穹窿(无并发症),腹腔镜子宫切除术后24小时内出现轻微术后疼痛的妇女人数显著增加。此外,这种方法减少了额外使用阿片类药物/镇痛药的需求。本研究强调了TLH术后24小时内布比卡因局部拱顶浸润的有益应用。
{"title":"Vaginal Vault Infiltration With Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Control Trial","authors":"Kallol Kumar Roy, Poojitha Kalyani Kanikaram, Nilanchali Singh, Vimi Riwari, Rinchen Zangmo, Jyoti Meena, Anamika Das, Deepika Kashyap, Archana Minz","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001194","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A viable alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy is total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), which offers abdominal route advantages for women in need of total hysterectomy for benign diseases. Fewer complications, faster recovery, and less pain are ensured by laparoscopy, although this method is not entirely devoid of pain. Reports from various authors indicate that up to 80% of laparoscopic surgery patients require opioid analgesia, which could increase hospital-stay duration and delay mobilization/recovery. Because of these statistics, opioid analgesic usages ought to be minimized, for the aforementioned reasons and also to prevent additional adverse effects. This study was performed to evaluate efficacy of reducing postoperative pain by infiltration of bupivacaine, a long-acting anesthetic agent, into the vaginal vault after TLH. This study was a randomized control trial designed as a 2-arm double-blinded study conducted at a North-Indian Apical Center in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. After written informed consent from all patients, computer-generated randomization software placed them in 1 of 2 groups: group 1, the intervention group (received the infiltration of bupivacaine in the vaginal vault following TLH), or group 2 (the control group). The inclusion criteria were a uterine size of ≤12 weeks' pregnancy and patients requiring TLH with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine size and benign conditions. Exclusion criteria were contraindication to any medication used by the study, presence of malignancy, history of multiple surgeries, and history of inflammatory disease. Postoperative pain outcome measured in both groups at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours via a visual analog score was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the need for rescue analgesia. A complete profile of each patient was created, using eligibility criteria, body mass index, and demographic profile, and a complete gynecological and physical examination was performed, along with preoperative investigations for fitness to general anesthesia. Per standard protocol, general anesthesia was administered for all surgeries. After vault closure, a fine-tipped aspiration needle was used to administer 10 mL of bupivacaine, which was infiltrated laparoscopically at 2 different locations, approximately 2–4 cm apart. The control group omitted this step. In the first 24 hours after operation, pain was treated using 1 g intravenous paracetamol every 6 hours. For the next 5 days, patients were given nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (diclofenac) 3 times daily for 5 days. Participants scaled their pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) score at the 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours intervals postsurgery. Scores greater than 4 initiated the distribution of tramadol 50 mg intramuscular. Also recorded were the uterine weight, the operative time, complications, and the amount of operative bleeding. Group 1 patients exhibited VAS scores of less than 4 ","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Predictive Value of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Testing for Rare Autosomal Trisomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 产前无细胞DNA检测对罕见常染色体三体的预测价值:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000979668.10711.82
Melissa L. Acreman, Sofia Bussolaro, Yvette C. Raymond, Ilaria Fantasia, Daniel L. Rolnik, Fabricio Da Silva Costa
ABSTRACT Noninvasive prenatal testing has been a reliable method for prenatal screening for the common autosomal trisomies for the last decade. It has been analyzed in many prospective studies for accuracy in screening for the most common trisomies—13, 18, and 21—and the technology has continued to progress. With high accuracy for common trisomies, advances are attempting to expand noninvasive prenatal testing for identifying rare autosomal trisomies, such as trisomies 7, 15, 16, and 22; sex chromosome aneuploidies; and segmental copy number variants. Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) technology is now available to screen for these abnormalities, accuracy and detection rates have not been well studied. This systematic review analyzes and reports the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA screening for the rare autosomal trisomies. This review included case series with 10 or more cases that reported on the accuracy of cfDNA in reporting rare autosomal trisomies that were confirmed by diagnostic results or postnatal genetic testing; the final review included 31 studies. Methodological analysis found the risk of bias to be high in most studies, with only 5 rated as high quality and low risk in all domains. All studies included in the final analyses were published between 2017 and 2022, and study populations ranged from 14 to 153,575 patients. Indications for screening and characteristics of the patients varied from study to study, with 12 studies in high-risk women, 10 studies in the general obstetric population, and 9 studies without inclusion of underlying risk factors and indications. Whole-genome sequencing was used in all studies as testing methodology. Testing timing varied and was performed anywhere from gestational week 8 to week 39. In the 3 studies that analyzed sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA testing, sensitivity ranged from 87.2% to 100%, and specificity ranged from 90.7% to 99.9%. In all 3 of these studies, there were significant limitations that led authors to acknowledge the difficulty of drawing clear conclusions about sensitivity and specificity from their data. Meta-analysis performed for positive predictive value (PPV) provided a pooled estimate of 11.46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.80%–15.65%). Sensitivity analysis including only studies at low risk of bias gave a PPV of 9.13% (95% CI, 2.49%–18.76%). Analysis was performed again with groups divided into high or low background risk, with a slightly higher PPV in the higher background risk group, but no significant difference between these groups ( P = 0.595). Statistical heterogeneity was not explained by year of publication or baseline risk of participants but could be largely explained by rate of diagnostic follow-up. Studies with a follow-up rate of less than 50% showed a PPV of 23.69% (95% CI, 9.21%–41.94%), whereas studies with a follow-up rate greater than 50% reported a PPV of 8.80% (95% CI, 6.08%–11.90%). Based on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, it is
在过去的十年中,无创产前检查一直是一种可靠的产前筛查常见常染色体三体的方法。在许多前瞻性研究中,它已经被分析用于筛选最常见的三体- 13、18和21 -的准确性,而且这项技术还在继续进步。随着对常见三体的高精度检测,非侵入性产前检测正在扩大,以识别罕见的常染色体三体,如7、15、16和22三体;性染色体非整倍体;和分段拷贝数变体。尽管无细胞DNA (cfDNA)技术现在可用于筛查这些异常,但准确性和检出率尚未得到很好的研究。本系统综述分析并报道了cfDNA筛查对罕见常染色体三体的诊断准确性。本综述纳入了10例或10例以上病例的病例系列,这些病例报告了cfDNA在报告罕见常染色体三体时的准确性,这些病例被诊断结果或出生后基因检测证实;最终的综述包括31项研究。方法学分析发现,大多数研究的偏倚风险较高,只有5项研究在所有领域被评为高质量和低风险。最终分析中包括的所有研究都是在2017年至2022年之间发表的,研究人群从14到153575名患者不等。筛查的适应症和患者的特征因研究而异,其中12项研究针对高危妇女,10项研究针对普通产科人群,9项研究未纳入潜在危险因素和适应症。所有研究均采用全基因组测序作为检测方法。测试时间各不相同,从妊娠第8周到第39周进行。在分析cfDNA检测敏感性和特异性的3项研究中,敏感性范围为87.2% ~ 100%,特异性范围为90.7% ~ 99.9%。在所有这3项研究中,有明显的局限性,使作者承认很难从他们的数据中得出关于敏感性和特异性的明确结论。对阳性预测值(PPV)进行meta分析,汇总估计为11.46%(95%置信区间[CI], 7.80%-15.65%)。仅包括低偏倚风险研究的敏感性分析得出PPV为9.13% (95% CI, 2.49%-18.76%)。再次进行分析,分为高背景风险组和低背景风险组,高背景风险组PPV略高,但两组间无显著差异(P = 0.595)。统计异质性不能用发表年份或参与者的基线风险来解释,但在很大程度上可以用诊断随访率来解释。随访率小于50%的研究显示PPV为23.69% (95% CI, 9.21%-41.94%),而随访率大于50%的研究报告PPV为8.80% (95% CI, 6.08%-11.90%)。基于本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果,以前报道的cfDNA检测罕见常染色体三体的诊断准确性ppv可能被高估了。造成这种情况的原因可能是随访率较低,以及在cfDNA结果较高的女性中存在检测偏差。罕见常染色体三体发病率低的一个原因是,许多确诊病例在妊娠12周之前导致流产。持续妊娠和非镶嵌妊娠通常会经历严重的并发症。镶嵌现象的发生可能会影响PPV,因为镶嵌现象具有一定的风险,但有时无法从cfDNA样本中检测到。本研究受限于所分析研究的细节;这导致了显著的统计异质性,限制了可以得出的结论。此外,检出率可能因cfDNA检测类型而异,本分析未按检测类型分层。本分析结果与以往关于在普通人群中检测罕见常染色体三体的文献一致,并表明即使cfDNA检测在一般情况下具有高特异性和敏感性,但在怀疑罕见常染色体三体的情况下,提供者和患者在做出临床决定时都应谨慎。
{"title":"The Predictive Value of Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Testing for Rare Autosomal Trisomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Melissa L. Acreman, Sofia Bussolaro, Yvette C. Raymond, Ilaria Fantasia, Daniel L. Rolnik, Fabricio Da Silva Costa","doi":"10.1097/01.ogx.0000979668.10711.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000979668.10711.82","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Noninvasive prenatal testing has been a reliable method for prenatal screening for the common autosomal trisomies for the last decade. It has been analyzed in many prospective studies for accuracy in screening for the most common trisomies—13, 18, and 21—and the technology has continued to progress. With high accuracy for common trisomies, advances are attempting to expand noninvasive prenatal testing for identifying rare autosomal trisomies, such as trisomies 7, 15, 16, and 22; sex chromosome aneuploidies; and segmental copy number variants. Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) technology is now available to screen for these abnormalities, accuracy and detection rates have not been well studied. This systematic review analyzes and reports the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA screening for the rare autosomal trisomies. This review included case series with 10 or more cases that reported on the accuracy of cfDNA in reporting rare autosomal trisomies that were confirmed by diagnostic results or postnatal genetic testing; the final review included 31 studies. Methodological analysis found the risk of bias to be high in most studies, with only 5 rated as high quality and low risk in all domains. All studies included in the final analyses were published between 2017 and 2022, and study populations ranged from 14 to 153,575 patients. Indications for screening and characteristics of the patients varied from study to study, with 12 studies in high-risk women, 10 studies in the general obstetric population, and 9 studies without inclusion of underlying risk factors and indications. Whole-genome sequencing was used in all studies as testing methodology. Testing timing varied and was performed anywhere from gestational week 8 to week 39. In the 3 studies that analyzed sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA testing, sensitivity ranged from 87.2% to 100%, and specificity ranged from 90.7% to 99.9%. In all 3 of these studies, there were significant limitations that led authors to acknowledge the difficulty of drawing clear conclusions about sensitivity and specificity from their data. Meta-analysis performed for positive predictive value (PPV) provided a pooled estimate of 11.46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.80%–15.65%). Sensitivity analysis including only studies at low risk of bias gave a PPV of 9.13% (95% CI, 2.49%–18.76%). Analysis was performed again with groups divided into high or low background risk, with a slightly higher PPV in the higher background risk group, but no significant difference between these groups ( P = 0.595). Statistical heterogeneity was not explained by year of publication or baseline risk of participants but could be largely explained by rate of diagnostic follow-up. Studies with a follow-up rate of less than 50% showed a PPV of 23.69% (95% CI, 9.21%–41.94%), whereas studies with a follow-up rate greater than 50% reported a PPV of 8.80% (95% CI, 6.08%–11.90%). Based on the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, it is","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cervical Cerclage: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines 宫颈环切术:主要指引的全面检讨
4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000001182
Sonia Giouleka, Eirini Boureka, Ioannis Tsakiridis, Antonios Siargkas, Apostolos Mamopoulos, Ioannis Kalogiannidis, Apostolos Athanasiadis, Themistoklis Dagklis
Importance Cervical cerclage (CC) represents one of the few effective measures currently available for the prevention of preterm delivery caused by cervical insufficiency, thus contributing in the reduction of neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. Objective The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and timing of placing and removal of CC. Evidence Acquisition A descriptive review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) on CC was carried out. Results There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the recommended techniques, the indications for rescue CC, the contraindications, as well as the optimal timing of CC placement and removal. All medical societies also agree that ultrasound-indicated CC is justified in women with history of prior spontaneous PTD or mid-trimester miscarriage and a short cervical length detected on ultrasound. In addition, after CC, serial sonographic measurement of the cervical length, bed rest, and routine use of antibiotics, tocolysis, and progesterone are unanimously discouraged. In case of established preterm labor, CC should be removed, according to ACOG, RCOG, and SOGC. Furthermore, RCOG and SOGC agree on the prerequisites that should be met before attempting CC. These 2 guidelines along with FIGO recommend history-indicated CC for women with 3 or more previous preterm deliveries and/or second trimester pregnancy miscarriages, whereas the ACOG suggests the use of CC in singleton pregnancies with 1 or more previous second trimester miscarriages related to painless cervical dilation or prior CC due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester. The role of amniocentesis in ruling out intra-amniotic infection before rescue CC remains a matter of debate. Conclusions Cervical cerclage is an obstetric intervention used to prevent miscarriage and preterm delivery in women considered as high-risk for these common pregnancy complications. The development of universal international practice protocols for the placement of CC seems of paramount importance and will hopefully improve the outcomes of such pregnancies. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives After participating in this activity, the learner should be able to identify the indications and contraindications of cervical cerclage; evaluate the prerequisites before cervical cerclage placement; and explain the strategies for perioperative and postoperative care after cervical cerclage placement.
重要性:宫颈环切术是目前可用于预防因宫颈功能不全引起的早产的少数有效措施之一,从而有助于降低新生儿发病率和死亡率。本研究的目的是回顾和比较最近发表的关于CC的适应症、禁忌症、技术和放置和移除时间的主要指南。证据获取对美国妇产科学院(ACOG)、皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)、加拿大妇产科学会(SOGC)、国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO)对CC进行了研究。结果经审查的指南对推荐的技术、抢救CC的适应症、禁忌症以及CC放置和取出的最佳时机达成了共识。所有医学协会也一致认为,超声指示的CC适用于有自发性PTD或中期流产史的妇女,超声检查发现宫颈长度较短。此外,CC后,连续超声测量宫颈长度,卧床休息,常规使用抗生素,胎解和黄体酮一致被劝阻。根据ACOG、RCOG和SOGC的建议,在确定早产的情况下,应切除CC。此外,RCOG和SOGC在尝试CC之前应满足的先决条件上达成一致。这两个指南以及FIGO建议有3次及以上早产和/或妊娠中期流产史的妇女使用CC,而ACOG建议在单胎妊娠中有1次及以上无痛性宫颈扩张相关的妊娠中期流产或妊娠中期无痛性宫颈扩张相关的妊娠中期流产或妊娠中期无痛性宫颈扩张相关的既往CC。羊膜穿刺术在抢救CC前排除羊膜内感染的作用仍然存在争议。结论宫颈环切术是一种产科干预措施,用于预防流产和早产,这些妇女被认为是这些常见妊娠并发症的高危妇女。制定通用的CC放置国际实践协议似乎至关重要,并有望改善此类妊娠的结果。目标受众:妇产科医生、家庭医生。参加本活动后,学习者应能识别宫颈环切术的适应症和禁忌症;评估宫颈环切置入前的先决条件;并解释宫颈环扎术后围手术期及术后护理策略。
{"title":"Cervical Cerclage: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines","authors":"Sonia Giouleka, Eirini Boureka, Ioannis Tsakiridis, Antonios Siargkas, Apostolos Mamopoulos, Ioannis Kalogiannidis, Apostolos Athanasiadis, Themistoklis Dagklis","doi":"10.1097/ogx.0000000000001182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001182","url":null,"abstract":"Importance Cervical cerclage (CC) represents one of the few effective measures currently available for the prevention of preterm delivery caused by cervical insufficiency, thus contributing in the reduction of neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. Objective The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and timing of placing and removal of CC. Evidence Acquisition A descriptive review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) on CC was carried out. Results There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the recommended techniques, the indications for rescue CC, the contraindications, as well as the optimal timing of CC placement and removal. All medical societies also agree that ultrasound-indicated CC is justified in women with history of prior spontaneous PTD or mid-trimester miscarriage and a short cervical length detected on ultrasound. In addition, after CC, serial sonographic measurement of the cervical length, bed rest, and routine use of antibiotics, tocolysis, and progesterone are unanimously discouraged. In case of established preterm labor, CC should be removed, according to ACOG, RCOG, and SOGC. Furthermore, RCOG and SOGC agree on the prerequisites that should be met before attempting CC. These 2 guidelines along with FIGO recommend history-indicated CC for women with 3 or more previous preterm deliveries and/or second trimester pregnancy miscarriages, whereas the ACOG suggests the use of CC in singleton pregnancies with 1 or more previous second trimester miscarriages related to painless cervical dilation or prior CC due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester. The role of amniocentesis in ruling out intra-amniotic infection before rescue CC remains a matter of debate. Conclusions Cervical cerclage is an obstetric intervention used to prevent miscarriage and preterm delivery in women considered as high-risk for these common pregnancy complications. The development of universal international practice protocols for the placement of CC seems of paramount importance and will hopefully improve the outcomes of such pregnancies. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives After participating in this activity, the learner should be able to identify the indications and contraindications of cervical cerclage; evaluate the prerequisites before cervical cerclage placement; and explain the strategies for perioperative and postoperative care after cervical cerclage placement.","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135388491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1