Ophthalmologica最新文献

Introduction: Vessel-associated retinal diseases are a major cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. The identification of appropriate biomarkers is of great importance to better anticipate disease progression and establish more targeted treatment options. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, single-stranded, noncoding ribonucleic acids that are involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression through hybridization with messenger RNA. The expression of certain miRNAs can be different in patients with pathological processes and can be used for the detection and differentiation of various diseases. In this study, we investigate to what extent previously in vitro identified miRNAs are present as cell-free circulating miRNAs in the serum and vitreous of human patients with and without vessel-associated retinal diseases.

Methods: Relative quantification by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze miRNA expression in patients with vessel-associated retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and retinal vein occlusion compared with control patients.

Results: In serum samples, miR-29a-3p and miR-192-5p showed increased expression in patients with neovascular AMD relative to control patients. Similarly, miR-335-5p, miR-192-5p, and miR-194-5p showed increased expression in serum from patients with proliferative DR. In vitreous samples, miR-100-5p was decreased in patients with proliferative DR. Differentially expressed miRNAs showed good diagnostic accuracy in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve analysis.

Conclusion: The miRNAs investigated in this study may have the potential to serve as biomarkers for vessel-associated retinal diseases. Combining multiple miRNAs may enhance the predictive power of the analysis.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the atrophic, tractional, and neovascular (ATN) components grading in highly myopic patients with dome-shaped macula (DSM) and ridge-shaped macula (RSM).

Methods: This was a cross-sectional, noninterventional study. 57 eyes of 38 different patients were included. They were classified as DSM or RSM based on the number of radial scans that showed an inward protrusion ≥50 µm in the swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) (12 = DSM; <12 = RSM). All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination in addition to SS-OCT. They were graded using the ATN system for myopic maculopathy by 2 masked retina specialists that assessed the atrophic (A), tractional (T), and neovascular (N) components in order to analyze the differences between the groups. As complementary measurements, age, axial length, and best-corrected visual acuity were collected. Height and orientation of the macular bulge and the presence of Bruch's membrane defects, scleral perforating vessels, and staphyloma were recorded.

Results: Out of total 57 eyes, 13 eyes (22.8%) were classified as DSM. Regarding the atrophic component (A), there were statistically significant differences between groups, with DSM group showing a greater stage of atrophy (predominantly stage A3 in 69.2% of the sample) compared to the RSM group (predominantly stage A2 in 61.3% of the sample) (p < 0.05). For the T and N components, there were no significant differences between groups. The presence of Bruch's membrane defects was more frequently seen in DSM (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: DSM group showed more Bruch's membrane defects and a greater stage of the atrophy component, based on the ATN grading system, compared with RSM group. As Bruch's membrane may have biomechanical properties in terms of strength, the defects found around the macula, added to the major atrophic component, may be a cause of a local relaxation that induce a central bulge forming the dome.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to report surgical outcomes and risk factors for primary surgical failure following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, RRD patients who underwent primary surgery at a tertiary center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020, were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as reoperation within 60 days postoperatively due to retinal re-detachment and putative risk factors for surgical failure were analyzed.

Results: Of 2,383 eyes (2,335 patients), 1,342 (56.3%) underwent vitrectomy and 1,041 (43.7%) underwent scleral buckling. The surgical failure rate was 9.1% overall, and 6.0% and 13.1% for the vitrectomy and scleral buckling groups, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, surgical failure was associated with surgical experience (first-year fellow vs. senior professor) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.66; p = 0.018), scleral buckling (OR: 2.33; p < 0.001), and longer axial length (AL; ≥26.5 mm) (OR: 1.49; p = 0.017). In each surgical approach, age <40 years (OR: 2.11; p = 0.029) in the vitrectomy group and age >40 years (OR, 1.84; p = 0.004), male sex (OR: 1.65; p = 0.015), and first-year fellows compared to senior professors (OR: 1.95; p = 0.013) in the scleral buckling group were associated with surgical failure. Lens status were not associated with the surgical failure rate.

Conclusion: In this large retrospective study using data from Korea, vitrectomy was superior to scleral buckling in terms of primary anatomical outcomes in the management of RRD. First-year fellows were a risk factor for surgical failure, especially for scleral buckling. Longer AL was a significant parameter for predicting the success rates.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare 2-field (2F) and 5-field (5F) mydriatic handheld retinal imaging for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity in a community-based DR screening program (DRSP).

Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional diagnostic study, evaluating images of 805 eyes from 407 consecutive patients with diabetes acquired from a community-based DRSP. Mydriatic standardized 5F imaging (macula, disc, superior, inferior, temporal) with handheld retinal camera was performed. 2F (disc, macula), and 5F images were independently assessed using the International DR classification at a centralized reading center. Simple (K) and weighted (Kw) kappa statistics were calculated for DR. Sensitivity and specificity for referable DR ([refDR] moderate nonproliferative DR [NPDR] or worse) and vision-threatening DR ([vtDR] severe NPDR or worse) for 2F compared to 5F imaging were calculated.

Results: Distribution of DR severity by 2F/5F images (%): no DR 66.0/61.7, mild NPDR 10.7/14.4, moderate NPDR 7.9/8.1, severe NPDR 3.3/5.6, proliferative DR 5.6/4.6, ungradable 6.5/5.6. Exact agreement of DR grading between 2F and 5F was 81.7%, within 1-step 97.1% (K = 0.64, Kw = 0.78). Sensitivity/specificity for 2F compared 5F was refDR 0.80/0.97, vtDR 0.73/0.98. The ungradable images rate with 2F was 16.1% higher than with 5F (6.5 vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Mydriatic 2F and 5F handheld imaging have substantial agreement in assessing severity of DR. However, the use of mydriatic 2F handheld imaging only meets the minimum standards for sensitivity and specificity for refDR but not for vtDR. When using handheld cameras, the addition of peripheral fields in 5F imaging further refines the referral approach by decreasing ungradable rate and increasing sensitivity for vtDR.

Introduction: To analyze visual and anatomical outcomes after switch to intravitreal brolucizumab therapy in eyes affected by neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents.

Methods: Retrospective study of eyes with nAMD that underwent intravitreal brolucizumab at San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) or San Rocco Clinical Institute (Ome, Italy) between January 2021 and July 2022. All study eyes had persistent residual retinal fluid after receiving at least 3 intravitreal injections of other anti-VEGF agents prior to switch to brolucizumab.

Results: Among 66 eyes from 60 patients (35 males; mean age 76.5 ± 7.4 years) with nAMD, 43 (65.2%) eyes received a complete loading dose of 3 brolucizumab injections, while 15 (22.7%) and 8 (12.1%) eyes were treated with 2 or 1 brolucizumab injections, respectively. The average number of brolucizumab injections was 2.5 during 4.0 ± 2.0 months (mean interval between two injections of 51.2 days). Lower letter gains (<5 letter improvement from baseline) were found in eyes that did not complete a loading dose, after a greater number of previous anti-VEGF injections, after a longer duration of disease, and in eyes with a greater rate of macular atrophy at baseline. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were found after switch to brolucizumab.

Conclusion: nAMD eyes with persistent residual retinal fluid despite frequent anti-VEGF treatment can still gain functional and anatomical improvements after switch to brolucizumab therapy. Despite a relevant heterogeneity in patients' response to brolucizumab, we identified potential biomarkers for functional and anatomical improvement.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the changes in serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and B after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) or conbercept (IVC) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Methods: In this prospective study, infants with type 1 ROP in both eyes were recruited in our hospital from September 2021 to February 2022, randomly assigned to the ranibizumab and conbercept groups and administered IVR or IVC (0.25 mg/0.025 mL). Blood samples were collected before the operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation to measure the concentrations of serum VEGF-A and B.

Results: A total of 20 ROP infants were randomly assigned to the ranibizumab (n = 10) and conbercept groups (n = 10). In the ranibizumab group, the serum VEGF-A concentrations before operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation were 73.55 ± 40.78, 11.47 ± 7.00, and 75.36 ± 30.87 pg/mL, respectively (p < 0.01). Least Significant Difference (LSD) pairwise comparison did not show any significant difference in the groups between 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p > 0.05). In the conbercept group, the serum VEGF-A concentrations before operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation were 86.69 ± 55.06, 14.68 ± 10.11, and 43.55 ± 57.92 pg/mL, respectively (p < 0.01). LSD comparison showed significant differences between 1 week and 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed between 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively (p > 0.05). Regarding serum VEGF-B concentrations before the operation and 1 and 4 weeks after the operation, no significant differences were detected in the ranibizumab group (p > 0.05), but significant differences were observed in the conbercept group (7.26 ± 2.34, 3.09 ± 2.41, and 4.55 ± 3.37 ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.01). LSD showed significant differences between 1 or 4 weeks postoperatively and preoperatively (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was detected between 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Serum VEGF-A levels in infants with ROP were suppressed after IVR or IVC but returned to preoperative levels at 4 weeks after IVR and remained lower than the preoperative levels at 4 weeks after IVC. Serum VEGF-B was not affected by IVR but was suppressed by IVC for 4 weeks.

Background: Growing evidence suggests an association between the infection from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and eye disorders. The aim of this review was to analyze the clinical presentation and diagnostic features of acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) and paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) associated with COVID-19 infection. The features are then compared with previous reports regarding these retinal disorders, to recognize possible specific characteristics and to assess the role of multimodal ophthalmic imaging.

Summary: A literature search was performed by consulting PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The following terms were searched: "(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR coronavirus) AND ([acute macular neuroretinopathy] OR [paracentral acute middle maculopathy])." Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) publication date from January 31, 2020 to January 31, 2022; (2) English language; (3) original research or case report; (4) free full-text availability.Optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in AMN patients were hyper-reflectivity (HR) of the outer plexiform layer, of the outer nuclear layer, and ellipsoid or interdigitation zones (EZ and IZ, respectively) disruption. In most cases, the presence of HR and EZ/IZ abnormalities resulted combined. When performed, OCT angiography (OCTA) identified attenuation of signal of the deep capillary plexus (DCP). The most common OCT finding in PAMM was an alteration of the inner nuclear layer, associated with other areas of HR, while no signs of EZ/IZ disruption were detected. When performed, OCTA showed the attenuation of signal of both the DCP and the superficial capillary plexus.

Key messages: In this review, we reported a case series of AMN and PAMM in patients with a previous or concomitant infection from SARS-CoV-2. The microvascular changes in these cases are highlighted by the OCTA scans. Even if we are far from the determination of a direct link between COVID-19 and these retinal disorders, we could hypothesize that the vascular alterations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection could be a possible risk factor for both AMN and PAMM.

Introduction: The performance of "en face" optical coherence tomography (OCT) in screening for chloroquine (CQ) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy has not been largely explored. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance of "en face" OCT with multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in screening for CQ/HCQ retinopathy.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study conducted at the Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, between August 2016 and February 2021. Patients taking HCQ were followed up over 2 consecutive years and received an "en face" OCT and a mfERG on each visit.

Results: A total of 91 patients (182 eyes) were analyzed. mfERG and "en face" OCT were concordant in 147 eyes (86.3%). Cohen's kappa coefficient for concordance between mfERG and "en face" OCT was considered weak with a value 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.72). The sensitivity and specificity of "en face" OCT were 70% (95% CI: 59-79%) and 91% (95% CI: 83-96%), respectively, relatively to mfERG. Proportion of abnormal R2/R5 and R3/R5 ratios did not differ between patients with normal and abnormal "en face" OCT (p = 0.2).

Discussion: "En face" OCT and mfERG have low concordance and cannot be used interchangeably as each investigation evaluates a different facet of CQ/HCQ retinopathy. "En face" OCT could be used as a complement in screening for CQ/HCQ retinal toxicity if the anomalies detected on "en face" OCT are confirmed by B-scan OCT sections.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications associated with the use of same-day bilateral intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods: This retrospective analysis of an open-label, multicenter, consecutive case series included 130 eyes of 65 patients with bilateral DME who were treated with intravitreal DEX implants. The patients were divided into two groups: a control group (comprising 40 eyes treated with an alternating unilateral regimen) and a study group (comprising 90 eyes treated with concomitant bilateral DEX implants). All patients were followed up monthly after implantation. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline to sixth month after implantation, and ocular adverse effects such as intraocular pressure, cataract, and tolerability of bilateral implantation were reviewed. The primary endpoint was to assess the safety of the same-day bilateral treatment protocol. The secondary endpoints focused on evaluating the functional and anatomical changes associated with bilateral simultaneous or alternating implantations.

Results: At 6 months after implantation, mean BCVA increased and CRT decreased in both groups. Moreover, no serious ocular adverse effects were observed. In addition, no differences were observed between the two groups in the number of patients who required extra follow-up visits or the number of extra visits made in addition to the treatment schedule.

Conclusions: Same-day bilateral intravitreal DEX implants are associated with a low complication rate and are well tolerated by patients. This safe practice may optimize efficiency and reduce the burden on both the health-care system and patients, when used to treat bilateral DME.