Pub Date : 2021-11-24eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S325042
Heather A Chubb, Eric R Cornish, Brian R Hallstrom, Richard E Hughes
Background: Benchmarking arthroplasty implant revision risk is an informative way to address implant performance. National benchmarking efforts exist in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Australia. Recently, the International Prosthesis Benchmarking Working Group, including representatives from industry, academia, and national registries, produced a guideline describing arthroplasty benchmarking methodology. The proposal was applied to data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) to assess its feasibility for benchmarking implants in the United States.
Methods: Primary elective total hip arthroplasty procedures performed for osteoarthritis between 2/15/2012 and 12/31/2018 and their associated revisions were identified in the MARCQI registry. The guidelines recommend that all prostheses combinations receive an early benchmark if they have at least 250 procedures at risk and the revision rate does not exceed the pre-determined standard of 2% at 2 years and 3% at 5 years.
Results: A total of 72,949 primary cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1369 had revisions. Twenty-nine and six stem/cup combinations satisfied the minimum case requirement at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Three implant combinations would not receive a benchmark at 2 years: Secur-Fit/Trident, Anthology/Reflection 3, Taperloc 133/G7.
Conclusion: The guideline can be implemented in the United States by a regional registry. Moreover, not all hip implants currently in use would receive an early benchmark. This raises concern as these implant combinations represent a significant number of cases in Michigan, some with increasing utilization.
{"title":"Early Benchmarking Total Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI).","authors":"Heather A Chubb, Eric R Cornish, Brian R Hallstrom, Richard E Hughes","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S325042","DOIUrl":"10.2147/ORR.S325042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benchmarking arthroplasty implant revision risk is an informative way to address implant performance. National benchmarking efforts exist in the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and Australia. Recently, the International Prosthesis Benchmarking Working Group, including representatives from industry, academia, and national registries, produced a guideline describing arthroplasty benchmarking methodology. The proposal was applied to data from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) to assess its feasibility for benchmarking implants in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary elective total hip arthroplasty procedures performed for osteoarthritis between 2/15/2012 and 12/31/2018 and their associated revisions were identified in the MARCQI registry. The guidelines recommend that all prostheses combinations receive an early benchmark if they have at least 250 procedures at risk and the revision rate does not exceed the pre-determined standard of 2% at 2 years and 3% at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72,949 primary cases met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1369 had revisions. Twenty-nine and six stem/cup combinations satisfied the minimum case requirement at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Three implant combinations would not receive a benchmark at 2 years: Secur-Fit/Trident, Anthology/Reflection 3, Taperloc 133/G7.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The guideline can be implemented in the United States by a regional registry. Moreover, not all hip implants currently in use would receive an early benchmark. This raises concern as these implant combinations represent a significant number of cases in Michigan, some with increasing utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"215-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/b2/orr-13-215.PMC8627892.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39683928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.
Results: The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (p value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (p=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.
Conclusion: Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.
{"title":"Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and an Outcome Comparison with the Conventional Minimally Invasive Fusion.","authors":"Asrafi Rizki Gatam, Luthfi Gatam, Harmantya Mahadhipta, Ajiantoro Ajiantoro, Omar Luthfi, Dina Aprilya","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S336479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S336479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the past few decades, the minimally invasive technique for spine surgery has developed extensively from the scope of decompression until fusion surgeries to reduce damages to the normal anatomical structure. Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is one of the fusion options which is readily available without a sophisticated minimal invasive instrument. Our aim is to introduce ULIF experience in our center and comparing the result with conventional minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 145 lumbar spondylolisthesis cases that underwent fusion surgery with either ULIF or the conventional MIS-TLIF. All of the patients were observed within a 12-month follow-up period to evaluate the back pain and leg pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and fusion rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leg pain VAS was similarly improved in both groups. ULIF has a significant back pain improvement on direct post operation and at the 3-months follow-up (<i>p</i> value 0.032 and 0.046 respectively). ULIF group also had a significantly better improvement of ODI scores on the early post-operative period (<i>p</i>=0.045). However, both groups similarly showed improvement of ODI score and the SF-36 at the 3-, 6-, and 12- months follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Full endoscopic fusion surgery with ULIF offers a comparable long-term outcome and a significantly better back pain VAS reduction in short-term follow up compared to the conventional MIS-TLIF. ULIF, with further improvement, can be the next gold standard in managing degenerative lumbar spine conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"229-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/1e/orr-13-229.PMC8628045.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39683929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Distal upper extremity weakness is a rare complication after herpes zoster, which can be easily misdiagnosed by other nerve entrapment syndromes. We present a 31-year-old immunocompromised woman who developed a claw-like deformity of her right hand after full medical treatment and resolution of herpes zoster. The electrodiagnostic finding was compatible with right multiple mononeuropathies of the median and ulnar nerves, ongoing axonal loss, unlike the nerve entrapment patterns. The early recognition and early electrodiagnosis of herpes zoster-induced distal motor weakness, especially in the upper extremity, is necessary to exclude the nerve entrapment syndrome and to be the baseline for functional motor recovery prediction. The prognosis of functional motor recovery is considered good but may take months to years to accomplish. Rehabilitation management plays an important role after full medical treatment.
{"title":"Claw Hand Deformity: A Rare Complication of Herpes Zoster.","authors":"Tachit Jiravichitchai, Waree Chira-Adisai, Monratta Panuwannakorn, Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S339064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S339064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distal upper extremity weakness is a rare complication after herpes zoster, which can be easily misdiagnosed by other nerve entrapment syndromes. We present a 31-year-old immunocompromised woman who developed a claw-like deformity of her right hand after full medical treatment and resolution of herpes zoster. The electrodiagnostic finding was compatible with right multiple mononeuropathies of the median and ulnar nerves, ongoing axonal loss, unlike the nerve entrapment patterns. The early recognition and early electrodiagnosis of herpes zoster-induced distal motor weakness, especially in the upper extremity, is necessary to exclude the nerve entrapment syndrome and to be the baseline for functional motor recovery prediction. The prognosis of functional motor recovery is considered good but may take months to years to accomplish. Rehabilitation management plays an important role after full medical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/27/orr-13-209.PMC8607187.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39655857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-19eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S321890
Andre Anvari, Amir Fathi, Ioanna K Bolia, Eric Piatt, Laith K Hasan, Aryan Haratian, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano
Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has been successfully utilized to treat symptomatic UCL insufficiency in overhead athletes. Despite the overall success of the procedure, attempts have been made to improve upon the original technique with the goal of hastening return to sport. Most recently, there has been interest in repairing or reconstructing the native ligament with internal brace (IB) augmentation. Biomechanical cadaveric studies assessing UCL repair with IB augmentation have attempted to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment; however, the literature is seemingly divided on its benefit. Preliminary clinical studies suggest internal bracing may allow a faster return to sport than conventional techniques. The purpose of this review was to provide an analysis of the current evidence on IB augmentation in UCL repair of the elbow as it pertains to biomechanical advantages/disadvantages, reported surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes in comparison with traditional UCL reconstruction techniques.
{"title":"Utilization of Internal Bracing in Elbow Medial UCL Stabilization: From Biomechanics to Clinical Application and Patient Outcomes.","authors":"Andre Anvari, Amir Fathi, Ioanna K Bolia, Eric Piatt, Laith K Hasan, Aryan Haratian, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S321890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S321890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has been successfully utilized to treat symptomatic UCL insufficiency in overhead athletes. Despite the overall success of the procedure, attempts have been made to improve upon the original technique with the goal of hastening return to sport. Most recently, there has been interest in repairing or reconstructing the native ligament with internal brace (IB) augmentation. Biomechanical cadaveric studies assessing UCL repair with IB augmentation have attempted to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment; however, the literature is seemingly divided on its benefit. Preliminary clinical studies suggest internal bracing may allow a faster return to sport than conventional techniques. The purpose of this review was to provide an analysis of the current evidence on IB augmentation in UCL repair of the elbow as it pertains to biomechanical advantages/disadvantages, reported surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes in comparison with traditional UCL reconstruction techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"201-208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/d3/orr-13-201.PMC8541765.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39569980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-19eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S321881
Aryan Haratian, Tara Shelby, Laith K Hasan, Ioanna K Bolia, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a lysine analog that exhibits an anti-fibrinolytic effect by directly preventing the activation of plasminogen as well as inhibiting activated plasmin from degrading fibrin clots, thereby promoting hemostasis and reducing the duration and quantity of blood loss. The aims of this study were to summarize the indications, routes of administration, safety, and clinical outcomes of TXA use throughout the different subspecialities in orthopedic surgery. Given that orthopedic procedures such as TKA, THA, fracture fixation, and various spine surgeries involve significant intraoperative blood loss, TXA is indicated in providing effective perioperative hemostasis. Additionally, use of TXA in orthopedic trauma has been indicated as a measure to reduce blood loss especially in a group with potential for hemodynamic compromise. TXA has been implicated in reducing the risk of blood transfusions in orthopedic trauma, joint surgery, and spine surgery, although this effect is not seen as prominently in sports medicine procedures. There remains disagreement in literature as to whether TXA via any route of administration can improve other clinically significant outcomes such as hospital length of stay and total operative time. Procedures that rely extensively on clarity on visualization of the surgical field such as knee and shoulder arthroscopies can greatly benefit from the use of TXA, thereby leading to less intraoperative bleeding, with better visual clarity of the surgical field. While most studies agree thrombosis due to TXA is unlikely, new research in cells and animal models are evaluating whether TXA can negatively impact other aspects of musculoskeletal physiology, however with conflicting results thus far. As of now, TXA remains a safe and effective means of promoting hemostasis and reducing intraoperative blood loss in orthopedic surgery.
{"title":"Utilization of Tranexamic Acid in Surgical Orthopaedic Practice: Indications and Current Considerations.","authors":"Aryan Haratian, Tara Shelby, Laith K Hasan, Ioanna K Bolia, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S321881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S321881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a lysine analog that exhibits an anti-fibrinolytic effect by directly preventing the activation of plasminogen as well as inhibiting activated plasmin from degrading fibrin clots, thereby promoting hemostasis and reducing the duration and quantity of blood loss. The aims of this study were to summarize the indications, routes of administration, safety, and clinical outcomes of TXA use throughout the different subspecialities in orthopedic surgery. Given that orthopedic procedures such as TKA, THA, fracture fixation, and various spine surgeries involve significant intraoperative blood loss, TXA is indicated in providing effective perioperative hemostasis. Additionally, use of TXA in orthopedic trauma has been indicated as a measure to reduce blood loss especially in a group with potential for hemodynamic compromise. TXA has been implicated in reducing the risk of blood transfusions in orthopedic trauma, joint surgery, and spine surgery, although this effect is not seen as prominently in sports medicine procedures. There remains disagreement in literature as to whether TXA via any route of administration can improve other clinically significant outcomes such as hospital length of stay and total operative time. Procedures that rely extensively on clarity on visualization of the surgical field such as knee and shoulder arthroscopies can greatly benefit from the use of TXA, thereby leading to less intraoperative bleeding, with better visual clarity of the surgical field. While most studies agree thrombosis due to TXA is unlikely, new research in cells and animal models are evaluating whether TXA can negatively impact other aspects of musculoskeletal physiology, however with conflicting results thus far. As of now, TXA remains a safe and effective means of promoting hemostasis and reducing intraoperative blood loss in orthopedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"187-199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a4/37/orr-13-187.PMC8541761.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39569979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.
Methods: This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.
Results: Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).
Conclusion: High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.
{"title":"High-Grade Bursal Side Rotator-Cuff Repair: A Surgical Outcome Review.","authors":"Renaldi Prasetia, Erica Kholinne, Prettysia Suvarly, Wendy Yolanda Rosa, Yuni Susanti Pratiwi, Herry Herman, Hermawan Nagar Rasyid, Bancha Chernchujit, Ronny Lesmana","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S323092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S323092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of high-grade bursal rotator cuff-tear repairs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was performed in May 2020 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using PubMed. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies reporting the results of pain improvement, functional outcome scores, and radiographic examinations after repair of bursal side partial rotator-cuff tears at any time point in patients of any age and with all levels of evidence. Exclusion criteria were articles not in English, in vitro or animal studies, epidemiological studies, and such article types as technical notes or narrative reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 articles, five were included in this study, of which three and two had level III and IV evidence, respectively, four were comparative studies, and one was a case series. Visual analogue scales were used in four of the five studies, all showing improvement in pain assessment from 5.87 preoperatively to 1.02 postoperatively. All five studies showed significant improvement on each functional outcome score at the final follow-up. The retear rate for all studies was 10.97% (27 of 246).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-grade bursal side partial-thickness rotator cuff-tear repair gave satisfactory results in terms of pain scores, range of motion, and functional outcomes. The retear rate was still considerably high (10.9%), necessitating better understanding of the basic science, such as molecular mechanisms during adaptation, to improve the surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bb/45/orr-13-179.PMC8524261.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39569978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-08eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S329367
Ashok Rajgopal, Sumit Kumar, Kalpana Aggarwal
Purpose: Varus deformity is the commonest presentation of the arthritic knee requiring surgical intervention. While correctable deformities lend themselves to realignment options like unicompartmental replacement, fixed deformities often need a total knee replacement. Current treatment options for patients with fixed coronal varus malalignment undergoing total knee arthroplasty include varying degrees of medial soft tissue releases, often leading to infringement of the medial collateral ligament complex and increased use of constrained options. We describe the role of the posterolateral (PL) tether in a select subgroup of patients needing release to achieve correction and minimising use of constrained options.
Patients and methods: A total of 384 patients with fixed varus deformity were retrospectively evaluated and categorised on the basis of weight bearing x-rays into four groups, namely, knees with angulation (F1), angulation with subluxation and torsion (F2), medial translation (F3) and deformity with major medial bone loss (F4). From this cohort, we identified patients with a tight PL tether that needed release to achieve good correction. These were predominantly in the F2 and F3 subgroups. Functional scores and outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 120.23 months.
Results: F1 cohort achieved good correction with medial soft tissue release, while F2 and F3 cohorts often needed a PL release. While functional outcomes and scores were comparable in both groups, survivorship was better in the group where release was done.
Conclusion: We recognise the role of the PL tether in a subgroup of patients with recalcitrant fixed varus deformities. Sequential release helped achieve good outcomes with minimal use of constrained options.
{"title":"Recognizing the Role of the Posterolateral Corner in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty for Fixed Varus Deformity.","authors":"Ashok Rajgopal, Sumit Kumar, Kalpana Aggarwal","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S329367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S329367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Varus deformity is the commonest presentation of the arthritic knee requiring surgical intervention. While correctable deformities lend themselves to realignment options like unicompartmental replacement, fixed deformities often need a total knee replacement. Current treatment options for patients with fixed coronal varus malalignment undergoing total knee arthroplasty include varying degrees of medial soft tissue releases, often leading to infringement of the medial collateral ligament complex and increased use of constrained options. We describe the role of the posterolateral (PL) tether in a select subgroup of patients needing release to achieve correction and minimising use of constrained options.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 384 patients with fixed varus deformity were retrospectively evaluated and categorised on the basis of weight bearing x-rays into four groups, namely, knees with angulation (F1), angulation with subluxation and torsion (F2), medial translation (F3) and deformity with major medial bone loss (F4). From this cohort, we identified patients with a tight PL tether that needed release to achieve good correction. These were predominantly in the F2 and F3 subgroups. Functional scores and outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 120.23 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>F1 cohort achieved good correction with medial soft tissue release, while F2 and F3 cohorts often needed a PL release. While functional outcomes and scores were comparable in both groups, survivorship was better in the group where release was done.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recognise the role of the PL tether in a subgroup of patients with recalcitrant fixed varus deformities. Sequential release helped achieve good outcomes with minimal use of constrained options.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Three.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"171-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/8b/orr-13-171.PMC8519409.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39540229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-10-02eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S333124
Aadit Shah, Eduard Pey, Justice U Achonu, Ji Dong K Bai, Fazel Khan
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms most seen in the abdominopelvic region, lung, and retroperitoneum; and less commonly seen in virtually any other site. We report a case of two lower limb masses consistent with diagnosis of IMTs. This is a 39-year-old woman with a history of right lower extremity popliteal fossa synovial sarcoma diagnosed 12 years prior and treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. She presented with two new - one anterior and one posterior - right thigh masses. Biopsies of the lesions demonstrated low-grade inflammatory spindle cell lesions at both sites. Wide resection was performed for both masses and further characterization of the surgical specimens was most consistent with IMT. At follow-up, the patient is well with no signs of recurrence 19 and 7 months postoperative to the resection of the anterior and posterior thigh masses, respectively. This case represents the first reported IMTs occurring as late as 12 years after primary cancer treatment, and the first occurring after synovial sarcoma.
{"title":"Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor 12 Years After Treatment for Synovial Sarcoma: A Case Report.","authors":"Aadit Shah, Eduard Pey, Justice U Achonu, Ji Dong K Bai, Fazel Khan","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S333124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S333124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms most seen in the abdominopelvic region, lung, and retroperitoneum; and less commonly seen in virtually any other site. We report a case of two lower limb masses consistent with diagnosis of IMTs. This is a 39-year-old woman with a history of right lower extremity popliteal fossa synovial sarcoma diagnosed 12 years prior and treated with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. She presented with two new - one anterior and one posterior - right thigh masses. Biopsies of the lesions demonstrated low-grade inflammatory spindle cell lesions at both sites. Wide resection was performed for both masses and further characterization of the surgical specimens was most consistent with IMT. At follow-up, the patient is well with no signs of recurrence 19 and 7 months postoperative to the resection of the anterior and posterior thigh masses, respectively. This case represents the first reported IMTs occurring as late as 12 years after primary cancer treatment, and the first occurring after synovial sarcoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/04/dc/orr-13-163.PMC8495227.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39504850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-28eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S324622
Isaac Okereke, Kingsley Mmerem, Dhanasekaraprabu Balasubramanian
Due to the inherent bony instability of the cervical spine, there is an over-reliance on ligamentous structures for stability, making this segment of the vertebral column most prone to traumatic injuries. The frequently occurring mechanisms of injury include axial compression, hyper-flexion, hyper-extension, and rotational type injuries. Good pre-hospital care and a thorough assessment in the emergency department of patients suspected to have a cervical spine injury (CSI) leads to improved clinical outcomes. The objective of the initial evaluation of a patient with a suspected CSI is to identify the presence of injuries through thorough clinical and radiologic assessments as missed injuries are potentially catastrophic. The treatment of cervical spine injuries can be conservative, pharmacological, or surgical, and aims to halt SCI progression, stabilize the spine, and to allow rehabilitation of the patient.
{"title":"The Management of Cervical Spine Injuries - A Literature Review.","authors":"Isaac Okereke, Kingsley Mmerem, Dhanasekaraprabu Balasubramanian","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S324622","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S324622","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to the inherent bony instability of the cervical spine, there is an over-reliance on ligamentous structures for stability, making this segment of the vertebral column most prone to traumatic injuries. The frequently occurring mechanisms of injury include axial compression, hyper-flexion, hyper-extension, and rotational type injuries. Good pre-hospital care and a thorough assessment in the emergency department of patients suspected to have a cervical spine injury (CSI) leads to improved clinical outcomes. The objective of the initial evaluation of a patient with a suspected CSI is to identify the presence of injuries through thorough clinical and radiologic assessments as missed injuries are potentially catastrophic. The treatment of cervical spine injuries can be conservative, pharmacological, or surgical, and aims to halt SCI progression, stabilize the spine, and to allow rehabilitation of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"151-162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/83/orr-13-151.PMC8487293.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39489854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-09-21eCollection Date: 2021-01-01DOI: 10.2147/ORR.S321884
Laith K Hasan, Brittney Deadwiler, Aryan Haratian, Ioanna K Bolia, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano
The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, continues to impact all facets of daily life. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 commonly include musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgias, arthralgias, and neuropathies/myopathies. The inflammatory response and its impact on the respiratory system have been the focus of most studies. However, the literature is more limited regarding the inflammatory response and its implications for other organ systems, specifically the musculoskeletal system. Previous studies have described how systemic inflammation may play a role in bone and joint pathology. Furthermore, it is important to understand the effects current therapeutics used in the treatment of COVID-19 may have on the musculoskeletal system. In this study, we will review the current understanding of the effect COVID-19 has on the musculoskeletal system, provide an overview of musculoskeletal symptoms of patients infected with the virus, and address key issues for clinicians to address during the care of COVID-19 patients.
{"title":"Effects of COVID-19 on the Musculoskeletal System: Clinician's Guide.","authors":"Laith K Hasan, Brittney Deadwiler, Aryan Haratian, Ioanna K Bolia, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S321884","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S321884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2, or COVID-19, continues to impact all facets of daily life. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 commonly include musculoskeletal symptoms such as myalgias, arthralgias, and neuropathies/myopathies. The inflammatory response and its impact on the respiratory system have been the focus of most studies. However, the literature is more limited regarding the inflammatory response and its implications for other organ systems, specifically the musculoskeletal system. Previous studies have described how systemic inflammation may play a role in bone and joint pathology. Furthermore, it is important to understand the effects current therapeutics used in the treatment of COVID-19 may have on the musculoskeletal system. In this study, we will review the current understanding of the effect COVID-19 has on the musculoskeletal system, provide an overview of musculoskeletal symptoms of patients infected with the virus, and address key issues for clinicians to address during the care of COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/f2/orr-13-141.PMC8464590.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39490399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}