首页 > 最新文献

Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Gestational carriers: A viable alternative for women with medical contraindications to pregnancy. 妊娠载体:一个可行的替代妇女的医疗禁忌症怀孕。
Pub Date : 2013-07-01 DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2013.35A2005
Raymond M Anchan, Stacey A Missmer, Katharine F Correia, Elizabeth S Ginsburg

Objective: Compare the efficacy of surrogate or gestational carrier (GC) cycles to that of autologous in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) in patients with gynecologic or medical co-morbidities contraindicative to pregnancy.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Infertility patients from a single university hospital-based program from 1998-2009.

Interventions: 128 GC cycles from 80 intended parents were identified and compared with 15,311 IVF or ICSI cycles.

Main outcome measures: The peak estradiol (E2), number of oocytes retrieved, cycle cancellation, ongoing pregnancy, and live-birth were compared between GCs and autologous IVF carriers. Indications for GC use were also identified. Multiple cycles contributed by the same patient were accounted for using multivariable generalized estimating equations and two-sided Wald p-values.

Results: Uterine factors (67%) was the most common indication for using a GC, followed by non-gynecologic medical conditions including coagulopathies (13%), end stage renal disease (10%), cardiovascular disease (5%) and cancer (5%). Adjusting for age, ovulation induction in GC cycles had similar peak E2 levels and number of oocytes retrieved relative to IVF cycles (p = 0.23 and 0.43, respectively). Clinical pregnancy (49% vs. 42%, p = 0.28) and live-birth rates (31% vs. 32%, p = 0.74) were also comparable. A sub-analysis of GC cycles in those women with uterine factor indications, demonstrated significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR = 2.0; CI = 1.2 - 3.5) with 60% greater odds of live-birth relative to IVF/ICSI cycles, however this odds was not statistically significant for differences in live-birth (CI = 0.9 - 2.9). Conclusions: GCs are a viable alternative to start families for patients with medical co-morbidities precluding pregnancy.

目的:比较代孕或妊娠载体(GC)周期与自体体外受精(IVF)/胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)在妇科或医学合并症禁忌症患者中的疗效。设计:回顾性队列研究。研究背景:1998-2009年来自单一大学医院项目的不孕症患者。干预措施:从80名准父母中确定128个GC周期,并将15311个IVF或ICSI周期进行比较。主要观察指标:比较GCs和自体体外受精携带者的雌二醇峰值(E2)、卵母细胞数量、周期取消、持续妊娠和活产。还确定了GC使用的适应症。使用多变量广义估计方程和双侧Wald p值对同一患者贡献的多个周期进行解释。结果:子宫因素(67%)是使用GC最常见的适应症,其次是非妇科疾病,包括凝血功能障碍(13%)、终末期肾病(10%)、心血管疾病(5%)和癌症(5%)。调整年龄后,GC周期的促排卵与IVF周期的E2峰值水平和卵母细胞数量相似(p分别= 0.23和0.43)。临床妊娠率(49%对42%,p = 0.28)和活产率(31%对32%,p = 0.74)也具有可比性。有子宫因子适应症的妇女GC周期亚分析显示,临床妊娠率明显较高(OR = 2.0;CI = 1.2 - 3.5),活产的几率比IVF/ICSI周期高60%,但活产的几率差异无统计学意义(CI = 0.9 - 2.9)。结论:GCs是一种可行的替代方案,开始家庭的医疗合并症排除妊娠的患者。
{"title":"Gestational carriers: A viable alternative for women with medical contraindications to pregnancy.","authors":"Raymond M Anchan,&nbsp;Stacey A Missmer,&nbsp;Katharine F Correia,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Ginsburg","doi":"10.4236/ojog.2013.35A2005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2013.35A2005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare the efficacy of surrogate or gestational carrier (GC) cycles to that of autologous <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) in patients with gynecologic or medical co-morbidities contraindicative to pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Infertility patients from a single university hospital-based program from 1998-2009.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>128 GC cycles from 80 intended parents were identified and compared with 15,311 IVF or ICSI cycles.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The peak estradiol (E2), number of oocytes retrieved, cycle cancellation, ongoing pregnancy, and live-birth were compared between GCs and autologous IVF carriers. Indications for GC use were also identified. Multiple cycles contributed by the same patient were accounted for using multivariable generalized estimating equations and two-sided Wald p-values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Uterine factors (67%) was the most common indication for using a GC, followed by non-gynecologic medical conditions including coagulopathies (13%), end stage renal disease (10%), cardiovascular disease (5%) and cancer (5%). Adjusting for age, ovulation induction in GC cycles had similar peak E2 levels and number of oocytes retrieved relative to IVF cycles (p = 0.23 and 0.43, respectively). Clinical pregnancy (49% vs. 42%, p = 0.28) and live-birth rates (31% vs. 32%, p = 0.74) were also comparable. A sub-analysis of GC cycles in those women with uterine factor indications, demonstrated significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates (OR = 2.0; CI = 1.2 - 3.5) with 60% greater odds of live-birth relative to IVF/ICSI cycles, however this odds was not statistically significant for differences in live-birth (CI = 0.9 - 2.9). Conclusions: GCs are a viable alternative to start families for patients with medical co-morbidities precluding pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19676,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"3 5B","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/40/05/nihms-657822.PMC4315940.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33370464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Psychological distress and SSRI use predict variation in inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy. 心理困扰和SSRI的使用预测妊娠期间炎症细胞因子的变化。
Pub Date : 2013-02-01 DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2013.31A034
Gwen Latendresse, R Jeanne Ruiz, Bob Wong

Evidence supports the premise that maternal psychological distress adversely affects pregnancy outcomes and that inflammatory markers and placentally-produced corticotrophin-releasing hormone (pCRH) are likely mediating factors. The primary aim of the study was to explore the associations between maternal psychological distress, use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, pCRH, and maternal plasma inflammatory markers during pregnancy. Measures of maternal plasma pCRH, Interleukins-1, 6, & 10, C-Reactive Protein, Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α were completed in 100 pregnant women. Measures of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress were completed, as well as collection of demographic/behavioral data, e.g. use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Significant correlations were found at 14-20 weeks gestation between IL-6 & 10, and depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. Also at 14 - 20 weeks gestation, IL10 levels were significantly lower in women with 4th quartile pCRH levels and IL1β, IL6, and IL10 were significantly lower among women who took an SSRI during pregnancy. After controlling for maternal age, BMI, pCRH level, and SSRI use, psychological distress remained to explain variation in maternal inflammatory markers. These results might suggest that future research should focus on whether depression and anxiety are effectively being treated during pregnancy, and how such a scenario might contribute to an immune system pathway to poor pregnancy outcome.

证据支持这一前提,即母亲的心理困扰会对妊娠结局产生不利影响,炎症标志物和胎盘产生的促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素(pCRH)可能是介导因素。该研究的主要目的是探讨妊娠期间母亲心理困扰、选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂、pCRH和母亲血浆炎症标志物的使用之间的关系。测定100例孕妇血浆pCRH、白细胞介素-1、6和10、c反应蛋白、巨噬细胞迁移抑制因子和肿瘤坏死因子-α。完成抑郁、焦虑和感知压力的测量,以及收集人口统计学/行为数据,例如使用选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)。妊娠14-20周时,IL-6和il - 10与抑郁、焦虑和感知压力之间存在显著相关性。同样在妊娠14 - 20周,pCRH水平为第4四分位数的妇女的il - 10水平显著降低,妊娠期间服用SSRI的妇女的il - 1β、il - 6和il - 10水平显著降低。在控制了母亲的年龄、BMI、pCRH水平和SSRI的使用后,心理困扰仍然可以解释母亲炎症标志物的变化。这些结果可能表明,未来的研究应该集中在怀孕期间抑郁和焦虑是否得到有效治疗,以及这种情况如何可能导致免疫系统途径导致不良妊娠结局。
{"title":"Psychological distress and SSRI use predict variation in inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy.","authors":"Gwen Latendresse,&nbsp;R Jeanne Ruiz,&nbsp;Bob Wong","doi":"10.4236/ojog.2013.31A034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2013.31A034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence supports the premise that maternal psychological distress adversely affects pregnancy outcomes and that inflammatory markers and placentally-produced corticotrophin-releasing hormone (pCRH) are likely mediating factors. The primary aim of the study was to explore the associations between maternal psychological distress, use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, pCRH, and maternal plasma inflammatory markers during pregnancy. Measures of maternal plasma pCRH, Interleukins-1, 6, & 10, C-Reactive Protein, Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-<i>α</i> were completed in 100 pregnant women. Measures of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress were completed, as well as collection of demographic/behavioral data, e.g. use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Significant correlations were found at 14-20 weeks gestation between IL-6 & 10, and depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. Also at 14 - 20 weeks gestation, IL10 levels were significantly lower in women with 4th quartile pCRH levels and IL1<i>β</i>, IL6, and IL10 were significantly lower among women who took an SSRI during pregnancy. After controlling for maternal age, BMI, pCRH level, and SSRI use, psychological distress remained to explain variation in maternal inflammatory markers. These results might suggest that future research should focus on whether depression and anxiety are effectively being treated during pregnancy, and how such a scenario might contribute to an immune system pathway to poor pregnancy outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19676,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"3 1A","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3919657/pdf/nihms497352.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32115579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23
期刊
Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1