Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare disorder, once exogenous causes have been excluded. However, when diagnosed, the majority of cases are adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent, of which a substantial minority are due to a source outside of the pituitary, ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). Differentiating among pituitary-dependent CS, Cushing's disease (CD) and an ectopic source can be problematic. Because non-invasive tests in the evaluation of CS patients often lack adequate sensitivity and specificity, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS), a minimally invasive procedure performed during the investigation of ACTH-dependent CS, can be extremely helpful. BIPSS is considered to be the gold standard for differentiating CD from the EAS. Furthermore, although such differentiation may indeed be challenging, BIPSS is itself a complex investigation, especially in recent times due to the widespread withdrawal of corticotrophin-releasing hormone and its replacement by desmopressin. We review current published data on this investigation and, in the light of this and our own experience, discuss its appropriate use in diagnostic algorithms.
一旦排除了外源性病因,库欣综合征(CS)是一种罕见的疾病。然而,一旦确诊,大多数病例都是促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)依赖型,其中相当一部分病例是由于垂体以外的原因引起的,即异位 ACTH 综合征(EAS)。区分垂体依赖性 CS、库欣病(CD)和异位源可能存在问题。由于评估 CS 患者的非侵入性检查往往缺乏足够的灵敏度和特异性,因此在检查 ACTH 依赖性 CS 时进行的微创手术--双侧下鼻底窦取样(BIPSS)会非常有帮助。BIPSS 被认为是区分 CD 和 EAS 的金标准。此外,尽管这种鉴别可能确实具有挑战性,但 BIPSS 本身也是一项复杂的检查,尤其是近来由于促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素的广泛停用并被去氨加压素所取代。我们回顾了目前已发表的有关该检查的数据,并根据这些数据和我们自己的经验,讨论了在诊断算法中使用该方法的适当性。
{"title":"Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome: A reappraisal","authors":"Majid Valizadeh, Behnaz Abiri, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Ashley Grossman","doi":"10.1111/joim.13789","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joim.13789","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cushing's syndrome (CS) is a rare disorder, once exogenous causes have been excluded. However, when diagnosed, the majority of cases are adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent, of which a substantial minority are due to a source outside of the pituitary, ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). Differentiating among pituitary-dependent CS, Cushing's disease (CD) and an ectopic source can be problematic. Because non-invasive tests in the evaluation of CS patients often lack adequate sensitivity and specificity, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS), a minimally invasive procedure performed during the investigation of ACTH-dependent CS, can be extremely helpful. BIPSS is considered to be the gold standard for differentiating CD from the EAS. Furthermore, although such differentiation may indeed be challenging, BIPSS is itself a complex investigation, especially in recent times due to the widespread withdrawal of corticotrophin-releasing hormone and its replacement by desmopressin. We review current published data on this investigation and, in the light of this and our own experience, discuss its appropriate use in diagnostic algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"296 1","pages":"2-23"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.13789","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140595143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>In April 2023, the <i>New York Times</i> published an opinion piece by author and heart transplant patient, Amy Silverstein [<span>1</span>]. Ms. Silverstein's perspective provoked an array of responses, some of which were angry because of the perception that she lacked gratitude for the second and third chance at life she was given. However, as professionals in the transplant field, Ms. Silverstein's story resonated with us, particularly her description of what she called the “gratitude paradox” wherein solid-organ transplant patients are expected to be grateful for what they have—a new, functioning organ—and are either implicitly or explicitly discouraged from asking for more and better posttransplant treatment options [<span>1</span>]. While her observations were personal for us, we see parallels that are relevant for the entire healthcare community. Ms. Silverstein pointed to the conflicting emotions of her own gratitude for her two heart transplants in the wake of her terminal cancer diagnosis, a diagnosis she states likely resulted from long-term use of immunosuppression medications meant to preserve her transplanted organ, and her desire to have more life. She wasn't ungrateful in expressing that desire; she was simply being human. While the specifics of Ms. Silverstein's life are relevant to the field of transplantation, we believe the human desires she expressed should cause the entire healthcare community to pause and reflect about why we chose this calling and our inherent responsibilities.</p><p>The concept of the gratitude paradox is not new. The BBC correspondent Kate Morgan explored this issue in a 2021 piece examining the complexities of gratitude for being employed in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic [<span>2</span>]. She discussed the dilemma many individuals experienced between being grateful to have a job during a time of rising unemployment and feeling underpaid, undervalued, and overburdened by employers [<span>2</span>]. Another, more historical example is the “separate but equal” laws, colloquially known as Jim Crow laws, that pervaded American life in the post-Civil War era through the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s. Under Jim Crow, Black Americans experienced and were expected to be grateful for (or as Davis [<span>3</span>] describes, “agreeable and non-challenging”), segregated conditions that proved to be anything but equal. There is a prevailing attitude that certain populations, in particular those who are vulnerable, such as patients with chronic medical conditions, racial and ethnic minority groups, or individuals from poorer socioeconomic backgrounds, should be thankful for whatever benefits of progress made in achieving a better life. They are viewed as troublemakers who lack gratitude whenever they suggest the bare minimum is not enough.</p><p>In our society, there is an expectation that disadvantaged and vulnerable populations should be grateful for having something that is one step above having nothin
{"title":"The gratitude paradox","authors":"Marie Chisholm-Burns, Richard N. Formica","doi":"10.1111/joim.13788","DOIUrl":"10.1111/joim.13788","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In April 2023, the <i>New York Times</i> published an opinion piece by author and heart transplant patient, Amy Silverstein [<span>1</span>]. Ms. Silverstein's perspective provoked an array of responses, some of which were angry because of the perception that she lacked gratitude for the second and third chance at life she was given. However, as professionals in the transplant field, Ms. Silverstein's story resonated with us, particularly her description of what she called the “gratitude paradox” wherein solid-organ transplant patients are expected to be grateful for what they have—a new, functioning organ—and are either implicitly or explicitly discouraged from asking for more and better posttransplant treatment options [<span>1</span>]. While her observations were personal for us, we see parallels that are relevant for the entire healthcare community. Ms. Silverstein pointed to the conflicting emotions of her own gratitude for her two heart transplants in the wake of her terminal cancer diagnosis, a diagnosis she states likely resulted from long-term use of immunosuppression medications meant to preserve her transplanted organ, and her desire to have more life. She wasn't ungrateful in expressing that desire; she was simply being human. While the specifics of Ms. Silverstein's life are relevant to the field of transplantation, we believe the human desires she expressed should cause the entire healthcare community to pause and reflect about why we chose this calling and our inherent responsibilities.</p><p>The concept of the gratitude paradox is not new. The BBC correspondent Kate Morgan explored this issue in a 2021 piece examining the complexities of gratitude for being employed in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic [<span>2</span>]. She discussed the dilemma many individuals experienced between being grateful to have a job during a time of rising unemployment and feeling underpaid, undervalued, and overburdened by employers [<span>2</span>]. Another, more historical example is the “separate but equal” laws, colloquially known as Jim Crow laws, that pervaded American life in the post-Civil War era through the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s. Under Jim Crow, Black Americans experienced and were expected to be grateful for (or as Davis [<span>3</span>] describes, “agreeable and non-challenging”), segregated conditions that proved to be anything but equal. There is a prevailing attitude that certain populations, in particular those who are vulnerable, such as patients with chronic medical conditions, racial and ethnic minority groups, or individuals from poorer socioeconomic backgrounds, should be thankful for whatever benefits of progress made in achieving a better life. They are viewed as troublemakers who lack gratitude whenever they suggest the bare minimum is not enough.</p><p>In our society, there is an expectation that disadvantaged and vulnerable populations should be grateful for having something that is one step above having nothin","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"295 6","pages":"712-714"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.13788","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140595152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}