首页 > 最新文献

Otology & Neurotology最新文献

英文 中文
Failure in HiRes Ultra Series Recall Devices Does Not Necessarily Lead to Decrement in Performance. HiRes Ultra 系列召回设备出现故障并不一定会导致性能下降。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004212
Erin Harvey, Muhammad Khokhar, Michael S Harris, Jazzmyne Adams, David R Friedland

Objective: To understand the impact on speech perception for patients experiencing Advanced Bionics V1 series Ultra and Ultra 3D cochlear implant failure.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary academic center.

Patients: Adult patients implanted with V1 series devices.

Interventions: Device integrity and speech perception testing.

Main outcome measures: consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio in quiet speech recognition scores.

Results: At our institution, 116 V1 series cochlear implants were placed in 114 patients. Thirteen devices in prelingual patients were excluded, leaving 103 (89%) for final analysis. Forty-eight (46.6%) devices were considered as failed using the company provided EFI analysis tool. There were 36 (65.5%) of the remaining 55 devices that consistently tested within normal range; the remainder lost to follow-up with unknown status. Among the 48 device failures, 29 were revised and 19 patients were not revised. Among those not revised, 11 self-opted for observation (57.9%). Observed patients, despite impedance changes meeting failure criteria, had no subjective or objective changes in speech perception. Sentence testing scores for failure patients who elected observation (82.9 ± 11.4%) were significantly higher at failure compared with those opting for revision (55 ± 22.8%, p = 0.006). For those undergoing revision surgery, significant improvement in post-activation scores was noted as compared with time of failure with a mean improvement of 12.9% (p = 0.002, n = 24) for consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores and 17.2% (p = 0.001, n = 19) for AzBio in quiet scores.

Conclusions: Proactive monitoring using EFI identifies a higher rate of Ultra Series V1 device failure than previously reported. However, about 20% of these patients may not have subjective change in hearing or objective decline in test scores and could be observed. Should performance worsen, reimplantation provides significant improvement in speech recognition.

目的:了解先进仿生公司 V1 系列 Ultra 和 Ultra 3D 人工耳蜗故障对患者语言感知的影响:了解 Advanced Bionics V1 系列 Ultra 和 Ultra 3D 人工耳蜗失败对患者言语感知的影响:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:三级学术中心:患者:植入 V1 系列设备的成年患者:主要结果测量:辅音-核-共鸣和AzBio安静语音识别评分:在本机构,114 名患者植入了 116 个 V1 系列人工耳蜗。其中有 13 名语前患者的设备被排除在外,最终分析结果为 103 人(89%)。使用公司提供的 EFI 分析工具,48 台(46.6%)设备被认为是失败的。在剩余的 55 台设备中,有 36 台(65.5%)的测试结果一直在正常范围内;其余设备因状态不明而失去随访。在 48 例装置故障中,29 例进行了修正,19 例患者未进行修正。在未修改的患者中,有 11 人自行选择了观察(57.9%)。接受观察的患者尽管阻抗变化符合故障标准,但在言语感知方面没有主观或客观的变化。选择观察的失败患者的句子测试得分(82.9 ± 11.4%)明显高于选择修正的患者(55 ± 22.8%,P = 0.006)。与失败时相比,接受复健手术的患者在激活后的评分有明显改善,辅音-核-谐音词评分平均提高了 12.9% (p = 0.002, n = 24),AzBio in quiet 评分平均提高了 17.2% (p = 0.001, n = 19):结论:使用 EFI 进行前瞻性监测发现的 Ultra Series V1 设备故障率高于之前的报告。然而,这些患者中约有 20% 的人可能没有主观听力变化或客观测试评分下降,因此可以对其进行观察。如果性能恶化,重新植入可显著提高语音识别能力。
{"title":"Failure in HiRes Ultra Series Recall Devices Does Not Necessarily Lead to Decrement in Performance.","authors":"Erin Harvey, Muhammad Khokhar, Michael S Harris, Jazzmyne Adams, David R Friedland","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004212","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the impact on speech perception for patients experiencing Advanced Bionics V1 series Ultra and Ultra 3D cochlear implant failure.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients implanted with V1 series devices.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Device integrity and speech perception testing.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio in quiet speech recognition scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our institution, 116 V1 series cochlear implants were placed in 114 patients. Thirteen devices in prelingual patients were excluded, leaving 103 (89%) for final analysis. Forty-eight (46.6%) devices were considered as failed using the company provided EFI analysis tool. There were 36 (65.5%) of the remaining 55 devices that consistently tested within normal range; the remainder lost to follow-up with unknown status. Among the 48 device failures, 29 were revised and 19 patients were not revised. Among those not revised, 11 self-opted for observation (57.9%). Observed patients, despite impedance changes meeting failure criteria, had no subjective or objective changes in speech perception. Sentence testing scores for failure patients who elected observation (82.9 ± 11.4%) were significantly higher at failure compared with those opting for revision (55 ± 22.8%, p = 0.006). For those undergoing revision surgery, significant improvement in post-activation scores was noted as compared with time of failure with a mean improvement of 12.9% (p = 0.002, n = 24) for consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores and 17.2% (p = 0.001, n = 19) for AzBio in quiet scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proactive monitoring using EFI identifies a higher rate of Ultra Series V1 device failure than previously reported. However, about 20% of these patients may not have subjective change in hearing or objective decline in test scores and could be observed. Should performance worsen, reimplantation provides significant improvement in speech recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Randomized Crossover Study in Single-Sided Deafness Comparing a Cartilage Conduction CROS System and an Air-Conduction CROS System. 单侧耳聋随机交叉研究,比较软骨传导 CROS 系统和空气传导 CROS 系统。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004199
Ken Takaki, Akinori Kashio, Etsushi Nozaki, Tomomi Kanai, Teru Kamogashira, Fumikazu Saze, Tsukasa Uranaka, Shinji Urata, Hajime Koyama, Yoshihiro Kawahara, Tatsuya Yamasoba

Objective: To investigate if cartilage conduction (CC) rerouting devices are noninferior to air-conduction (AC) rerouting devices for single-sided deafness (SSD) patients by measuring objective and subjective performance using speech-in-noise tests that resemble a realistic hearing environment, sound localization tests, and standardized questionnaires.

Study design: Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover study.

Setting: Anechoic room inside a university.

Patients: Nine adults between 21 and 58 years of age with severe or profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Interventions: Patients' baseline hearing was assessed; they then used both the cartilage conduction contralateral routing of signals device (CC-CROS) and an air-conduction CROS hearing aid (AC-CROS). Patients wore each device for 2 weeks in a randomly assigned order.

Main outcome measures: Three main outcome measures were 1) speech-in-noise tests, measuring speech reception thresholds; 2) proportion of correct sound localization responses; and 3) scores on the questionnaires, "Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit" (APHAB) and "Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale" with 12 questions (SSQ-12).

Results: Speech reception threshold improved significantly when noise was ambient, and speech was presented from the front or the poor-ear side with both CC-CROS and AC-CROS. When speech was delivered from the better-ear side, AC-CROS significantly improved performance, whereas CC-CROS had no significant effect. Both devices mainly worsened sound localization, whereas the APHAB and SSQ-12 scores showed benefits.

Conclusion: CC-CROS has noninferior hearing-in-noise performance except when the speech was presented to the better ear under ambient noise. Subjective measures showed that the patients realized the effectiveness of both devices.

目的通过使用类似真实听力环境的噪音语言测试、声音定位测试和标准化问卷,测量单侧耳聋(SSD)患者的客观和主观表现,研究软骨传导(CC)改道装置是否不逊于空气传导(AC)改道装置:研究设计:前瞻性、单受试者随机交叉研究:研究设计:前瞻性单个受试者随机交叉研究:九名年龄在 21 至 58 岁之间、患有严重或极重度单侧感音神经性听力损失的成年人:对患者的基线听力进行评估,然后使用软骨传导对侧路由信号装置(CC-CROS)和空气传导 CROS 助听器(AC-CROS)。患者按照随机分配的顺序佩戴每种设备2周:三个主要结果测量指标为:1)噪音中的言语测试,测量言语接收阈值;2)声音定位反应的正确率;3)"助听器益处简表"(APHAB)和 "言语、空间和听力质量量表"(SSQ-12)12 个问题的问卷得分:结果:当周围有噪音,且从 CC-CROS 和 AC-CROS 的正面或耳部较差的一侧播放语音时,语音接收阈值明显提高。当语音从耳部较好的一侧发出时,AC-CROS 能明显提高性能,而 CC-CROS 则没有明显效果。这两种设备都主要恶化了声音定位,而 APHAB 和 SSQ-12 分数则显示出优势:结论:CC-CROS 在噪声中的听力表现并不逊色,除非是在环境噪声中向较好的耳朵播放语音。主观测量结果表明,患者认识到了两种设备的有效性。
{"title":"A Randomized Crossover Study in Single-Sided Deafness Comparing a Cartilage Conduction CROS System and an Air-Conduction CROS System.","authors":"Ken Takaki, Akinori Kashio, Etsushi Nozaki, Tomomi Kanai, Teru Kamogashira, Fumikazu Saze, Tsukasa Uranaka, Shinji Urata, Hajime Koyama, Yoshihiro Kawahara, Tatsuya Yamasoba","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004199","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate if cartilage conduction (CC) rerouting devices are noninferior to air-conduction (AC) rerouting devices for single-sided deafness (SSD) patients by measuring objective and subjective performance using speech-in-noise tests that resemble a realistic hearing environment, sound localization tests, and standardized questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Anechoic room inside a university.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Nine adults between 21 and 58 years of age with severe or profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients' baseline hearing was assessed; they then used both the cartilage conduction contralateral routing of signals device (CC-CROS) and an air-conduction CROS hearing aid (AC-CROS). Patients wore each device for 2 weeks in a randomly assigned order.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Three main outcome measures were 1) speech-in-noise tests, measuring speech reception thresholds; 2) proportion of correct sound localization responses; and 3) scores on the questionnaires, \"Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit\" (APHAB) and \"Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale\" with 12 questions (SSQ-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Speech reception threshold improved significantly when noise was ambient, and speech was presented from the front or the poor-ear side with both CC-CROS and AC-CROS. When speech was delivered from the better-ear side, AC-CROS significantly improved performance, whereas CC-CROS had no significant effect. Both devices mainly worsened sound localization, whereas the APHAB and SSQ-12 scores showed benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CC-CROS has noninferior hearing-in-noise performance except when the speech was presented to the better ear under ambient noise. Subjective measures showed that the patients realized the effectiveness of both devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141069916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ceftazidime Poloxamer Gel: Expanding the Therapeutic Armamentarium for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Pseudomonas Mastoid Cavity Otorrhea. 头孢他啶聚氧乙烯醚凝胶:扩大耐环丙沙星假单胞菌乳突腔耳病的治疗范围
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004206
Catherine F Roy, Bertrand Cohen-Tenoudji, Tamara Mijovic

Objective: To present and evaluate the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas mastoid cavity otorrhea with a ceftazidime thermosensitive poloxamer gel.

Study design: A retrospective clinical capsule report.

Patients: Three patients diagnosed with ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas otorrhea in the setting of a previous canal-wall-down mastoidectomy between March 2019 and June 2023 visiting our tertiary care institution were retrospectively reviewed.

Intervention: Application of a 2% ceftazidime thermosensitive poloxamer gel to mastoid cavity.

Main outcome measures: No evidence of disease during microscopic inspection of the ear within a month of initial treatment or bacterial eradication on subsequent culture.

Results: Two patients had complete resolution of symptoms and achieved a safe and dry ear after topical application of the hydrogel. The second patient had pseudomonal eradication on culture, but persistent otorrhea due to other multidrug-resistant bacteria and an anatomically unfavorable mastoid cavity, which ultimately resolved after revision surgery.

Conclusions: This small case series suggests that topical treatment of mastoid cavity otorrhea with a 2% ceftazidime poloxomer gel is a potential therapeutic avenue in patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas .

研究目的研究设计:回顾性临床胶囊报告:回顾性临床胶囊报告:回顾性分析了2019年3月至2023年6月期间在本三级医疗机构就诊的3例既往行乳突管壁下乳突切除术而确诊为环丙沙星耐药假单胞菌性耳炎的患者:在乳突腔内涂抹2%头孢他啶热敏多聚酶凝胶:干预措施:在乳突腔涂抹2%头孢他啶热敏多聚酶凝胶:结果:两名患者在局部使用水凝胶后症状完全消失,耳部安全干燥。第二名患者的假性细菌在培养中被根除,但由于其他耐多药细菌和乳突腔解剖结构不良,导致持续性耳痛,最终在翻修手术后症状得到缓解:这一小型病例系列表明,使用2%头孢他啶聚氧乙烯醚凝胶局部治疗乳突腔耳痛是环丙沙星耐药假单胞菌患者的一种潜在治疗方法。
{"title":"Ceftazidime Poloxamer Gel: Expanding the Therapeutic Armamentarium for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Pseudomonas Mastoid Cavity Otorrhea.","authors":"Catherine F Roy, Bertrand Cohen-Tenoudji, Tamara Mijovic","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004206","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present and evaluate the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas mastoid cavity otorrhea with a ceftazidime thermosensitive poloxamer gel.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective clinical capsule report.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Three patients diagnosed with ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas otorrhea in the setting of a previous canal-wall-down mastoidectomy between March 2019 and June 2023 visiting our tertiary care institution were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Application of a 2% ceftazidime thermosensitive poloxamer gel to mastoid cavity.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>No evidence of disease during microscopic inspection of the ear within a month of initial treatment or bacterial eradication on subsequent culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two patients had complete resolution of symptoms and achieved a safe and dry ear after topical application of the hydrogel. The second patient had pseudomonal eradication on culture, but persistent otorrhea due to other multidrug-resistant bacteria and an anatomically unfavorable mastoid cavity, which ultimately resolved after revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This small case series suggests that topical treatment of mastoid cavity otorrhea with a 2% ceftazidime poloxomer gel is a potential therapeutic avenue in patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant Pseudomonas .</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141076591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fatal Presentation of Susac Syndrome in a Congenitally Deaf Patient With a Cochlear Implant. 一名植入人工耳蜗的先天性耳聋患者因苏萨克综合征而死亡。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004201
John E Richter, Katelyn S Rourk, Michael W Stewart, Mallory J Raymond

Objective: To report a fatal case of Susac syndrome in a congenitally deaf patient with a cochlear implant and a history of migraines, emphasizing the diagnostic challenges in patients with preexisting conditions.

Patient: A 33-year-old male with congenital hearing loss, a cochlear implant, and chronic migraines who presented with mild subacute auditory disturbance and headaches that later progressed to severe encephalopathy.

Intervention: Explantation of a non-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible cochlear implant followed by MRI, fundoscopy, and the administration of immunosuppressive medications.

Main outcome measures: Diagnosis was confirmed by characteristic MRI appearance and the presence of a hemi-retinal artery occlusion.

Results: After weeks of immunosuppressive treatment, the patient died of a global cerebral ischemic event of unknown origin.

Conclusions: For patients with preexisting sensorineural hearing loss and cochlear implants, Susac syndrome poses a diagnostic challenge. Auditory disturbances in the absence of cochlear implant failure should prompt further evaluation for visual disturbances and encephalopathy. MRI and fundoscopy should be performed to detect other features of the disease.

目的报告一例致命的苏萨克综合征病例,患者先天性耳聋,植入人工耳蜗,有偏头痛病史:患者:33 岁男性,患有先天性听力损失、人工耳蜗植入术和慢性偏头痛,曾出现轻度亚急性听觉障碍和头痛,后发展为严重脑病:干预措施:植入非磁共振成像(MRI)兼容的人工耳蜗,然后进行磁共振成像、眼底镜检查,并服用免疫抑制药物:通过磁共振成像的特征性外观和半视网膜动脉闭塞的存在来确诊:经过数周的免疫抑制治疗后,患者死于原因不明的全脑缺血事件:对于已有感音神经性听力损失并植入人工耳蜗的患者来说,苏萨克综合征是一个诊断难题。在没有人工耳蜗植入失败的情况下出现听觉障碍,应进一步评估视觉障碍和脑病。应进行核磁共振成像和眼底镜检查,以发现该病的其他特征。
{"title":"Fatal Presentation of Susac Syndrome in a Congenitally Deaf Patient With a Cochlear Implant.","authors":"John E Richter, Katelyn S Rourk, Michael W Stewart, Mallory J Raymond","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004201","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004201","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report a fatal case of Susac syndrome in a congenitally deaf patient with a cochlear implant and a history of migraines, emphasizing the diagnostic challenges in patients with preexisting conditions.</p><p><strong>Patient: </strong>A 33-year-old male with congenital hearing loss, a cochlear implant, and chronic migraines who presented with mild subacute auditory disturbance and headaches that later progressed to severe encephalopathy.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Explantation of a non-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible cochlear implant followed by MRI, fundoscopy, and the administration of immunosuppressive medications.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Diagnosis was confirmed by characteristic MRI appearance and the presence of a hemi-retinal artery occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After weeks of immunosuppressive treatment, the patient died of a global cerebral ischemic event of unknown origin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients with preexisting sensorineural hearing loss and cochlear implants, Susac syndrome poses a diagnostic challenge. Auditory disturbances in the absence of cochlear implant failure should prompt further evaluation for visual disturbances and encephalopathy. MRI and fundoscopy should be performed to detect other features of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy. 中窝开颅手术后零星小前庭斯旺瘤患者的生活质量。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004202
Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Olivia La Monte, Joshua Lee, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman

Objective: To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

Study design: Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.

Setting: Tertiary academic institution.

Patients: Adults with sporadic VS.

Interventions: MCF.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.

Results: Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.

目的:评估前庭分裂瘤(VS)患者接受中颅窝入路手术后的生活质量:评估前庭分裂瘤(VS)患者接受中颅窝方法(MCF)治疗后的生活质量:2018年至2023年的前瞻性研究:三级学术机构:成人散发性VS.干预措施:MCF:MCF.主要结果测量:主要结局指标为术前和术后1年宾州听神经瘤生活质量(PANQOL)评分的变化。次要结果指标包括听力保护和面神经功能:在164名因散发性VS而接受MCF手术的患者中,78名患者选择在术前自愿完成术前PANQOL评估。这 78 名患者中有 71 人(91%)完成了术后 PANQOL 调查。其中 50 名(70%)受访者为女性,年龄中位数为 48 岁(27-71 岁)。总体而言,术后 1 年,听力(平均差异为 10.5;95% 置信区间 [CI],4.3-16.7)和焦虑(平均差异为 18.8;95% 置信区间,11.7-25.9)领域的临床意义最小差异(MCID)。听力保留患者(48 人,68%)的听力(平均差异为 13.4;95% CI 为 6.3-20.6)、焦虑(平均差异为 20.8;95% CI 为 11.8-29.9)、能量(平均差异为 13.7;95% CI 为 3.6-23.8)、疼痛(平均差异为 13.7;95% CI 为 3.6-23.8)和 PANQOL 总分(平均差异为 12.7;95% CI 为 7.1-18.3)均达到 MCID。术后,64 名患者(90%)保持了 House-Brackmann I 级评分:据我们所知,这是针对接受 MCF 的 VS 患者进行的最大规模的疾病特异性 QOL 研究。根据我们医院的经验,MCF 方法治疗小型 VS 可改善患者的 QOL、听力和面神经预后,具有临床意义。
{"title":"Quality of Life for Patients with Sporadic Small Vestibular Schwannomas Following Middle Fossa Craniotomy.","authors":"Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Olivia La Monte, Joshua Lee, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004202","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004202","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate quality-of-life outcomes for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) undergoing a middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with sporadic VS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>MCF.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the change in preoperative and 1-year postoperative Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-life (PANQOL) scores. Secondary outcome measures included hearing preservation and facial nerve function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 164 patients who underwent MCF for sporadic VS, 78 patients elected to voluntarily complete preoperative PANQOL assessments prior to surgery. Seventy-one (91%) of those 78 patients completed postoperative PANQOL surveys. Fifty (70%) of the respondents were female and the median age was 48 years (range, 27-71 years). Overall, at 1-year postsurgery, a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was obtained in the hearing (mean difference, 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-16.7) and anxiety (mean difference, 18.8; 95% CI, 11.7-25.9) domains. For patients with hearing preservation (n = 48, 68%), MCIDs were reached in the hearing (mean difference, 13.4; 95% CI, 6.3-20.6), anxiety (mean difference, 20.8; 95% CI, 11.8-29.9), energy (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8), pain (mean difference, 13.7; 95% CI, 3.6-23.8) domains, and overall PANQOL scores (mean difference, 12.7; 95% CI, 7.1-18.3). Postoperatively, 64 (90%) patients maintained a House-Brackmann I.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the largest study examining disease-specific QOL for VS patients undergoing MCF. Based on our institution's experience, MCF approach for small VS is associated with clinically meaningful improvements in QOL, hearing preservation, and excellent facial nerve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141070535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With TMTC2 -Associated Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-Synchrony. TMTC2 相关感音神经性听力损失和听觉神经病/听觉不同步患者的人工耳蜗植入效果。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004208
Lauren North, Michael Olivier, Christina L Runge

Objective: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony.

Patients: Adult and pediatric cochlear implant (CI) patients followed in an academic center who tested positive for TMTC2 genetic variant rs35725509.

Intervention: Cochlear implantation.

Main outcome measures: Speech perception scores in quiet.

Results: Ten CI patients were identified with TMTC2 variant rs35725509 out of 157 patients who underwent genetic testing (i.e., 6.3% of patients tested). All demonstrated progressive, bilateral hearing loss with severe-to-profound audiometric thresholds preoperatively. Pre-CI and 1-year post-CI speech recognition percent correct scores were compared. Post-CI speech perception (mean 61.0%, standard deviation 31.4%) was significantly higher than pre-CI speech perception (mean 21.0%, standard deviation 27.0%) ( p = 0.002). Individually, 9 of the 10 subjects experienced significant improvements in speech perception pre- to post-CI ( p < 0.05). Electrically evoked compound action potential measures were available for five patients, and all showed normal electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.

Conclusion: Patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony have significantly improved speech perception outcomes with cochlear implantation and should be considered candidates for this intervention if there are no other contraindications.

目的研究TMTC2相关感音神经性听力损失和听觉神经病变/听觉不同步患者的人工耳蜗植入效果:干预措施:人工耳蜗植入术:干预措施:人工耳蜗植入:主要结果测量:安静时的语音感知评分:在接受基因检测的157名患者中,有10名CI患者被确定为TMTC2基因变异体rs35725509阳性患者(占接受检测患者的6.3%)。所有患者术前均表现为进行性、双侧听力损失,听阈从严重到惊人。比较了 CI 前和 CI 后 1 年的语音识别正确率。CI 后的言语感知能力(平均 61.0%,标准差 31.4%)明显高于 CI 前的言语感知能力(平均 21.0%,标准差 27.0%)(p = 0.002)。10名受试者中,有9人的言语感知能力在CI前和CI后都有明显改善(p < 0.05)。5名患者的电诱发复合动作电位测量结果显示,所有患者的电诱发复合动作电位阈值均正常:结论:TMTC2相关感音神经性听力损失和听神经病变/听觉不同步患者在接受人工耳蜗植入术后,言语感知能力明显改善。
{"title":"Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With TMTC2 -Associated Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dys-Synchrony.","authors":"Lauren North, Michael Olivier, Christina L Runge","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004208","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult and pediatric cochlear implant (CI) patients followed in an academic center who tested positive for TMTC2 genetic variant rs35725509.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Speech perception scores in quiet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten CI patients were identified with TMTC2 variant rs35725509 out of 157 patients who underwent genetic testing (i.e., 6.3% of patients tested). All demonstrated progressive, bilateral hearing loss with severe-to-profound audiometric thresholds preoperatively. Pre-CI and 1-year post-CI speech recognition percent correct scores were compared. Post-CI speech perception (mean 61.0%, standard deviation 31.4%) was significantly higher than pre-CI speech perception (mean 21.0%, standard deviation 27.0%) ( p = 0.002). Individually, 9 of the 10 subjects experienced significant improvements in speech perception pre- to post-CI ( p < 0.05). Electrically evoked compound action potential measures were available for five patients, and all showed normal electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with TMTC2 -associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony have significantly improved speech perception outcomes with cochlear implantation and should be considered candidates for this intervention if there are no other contraindications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168879/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141069953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes After Exoscopic Versus Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty. 鼓室外腔镜与显微镜下 1 型鼓室成形术的疗效对比
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004220
Caleb J Fan, Christian G Fritz, Jacob C Lucas, Robert M Conway, Masanari G Kato, Seilesh C Babu

Objective: To analyze the outcomes of exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.

Patients: Adult subjects with a diagnosis of tympanic membrane perforation from 2018 to 2022.

Intervention: Exoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty with cartilage + perichondrium or perichondrium/fascia graft.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were graft success rate (1 wk, 3 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo postoperatively) and operative time. Secondary outcomes included audiometric outcomes of postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), change in ABG, pure tone average (PTA), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS) at 6-month follow-up and complication rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial nerve injury, persistent tinnitus, and persistent vertigo.

Results: Seventy-one patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty by a single surgeon. Thirty-six patients underwent exoscopic tympanoplasty, and 35 patients underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Cartilage and perichondrium were utilized in 27 subjects (75.0%) in the exoscopic group and in 25 subjects (71.4%) in the microscopic group (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.04). Graft success rate was as follows (exoscope versus microscope): 100% (36/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 1 week (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.0), 97.2% (35/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 3 weeks (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.1), 97.2% (35/36) versus 94.3% (33/35) at 3 months (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.07), and 91.7% (33/36) versus 91.4% (32/35) at 6 months (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.0). Operative time was 57.7 minutes for the exoscopic group and 65.4 minutes for the microscopic group (p = 0.08, 95% CI [-16.4, 0.9], Cohen's d = 0.4). There were no serious complications. All preoperative and postoperative audiometric outcomes were comparable.

Conclusions: The outcomes after exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty are comparable.

研究目的分析外窥镜与显微镜下1型鼓室成形术的疗效:回顾性病历审查:患者:被诊断为鼓膜穿孔的成人患者:2018年至2022年期间诊断为鼓膜穿孔的成年受试者.干预措施:外镜或显微镜鼓室成形术,软骨+软骨周围或软骨周围/筋膜移植.主要结局指标:主要结果:移植成功率(术后 1 周、3 周、3 个月和 6 个月)和手术时间。次要结果包括术后气骨间隙 (ABG)、ABG 变化、纯音平均值 (PTA)、语言接收阈值 (SRT) 和 6 个月随访时的单词识别评分 (WRS) 等听力结果,以及脑脊液漏、面神经损伤、持续性耳鸣和持续性眩晕等并发症发生率:71名患者由一名外科医生进行了1型鼓室成形术。36名患者接受了鼓室外腔镜鼓室成形术,35名患者接受了显微鼓室成形术。外窥镜组有 27 名受试者(75.0%)使用了软骨和软骨周围组织,显微镜组有 25 名受试者(71.4%)使用了软骨和软骨周围组织(P = 0.7,Cramer's V = 0.04)。移植成功率如下(外镜与显微镜):100%(36/36)对100%(36/36):1周时,100%(36/36)对100%(35/35)(p = 1.0,Cramer's V = 0.0),3周时,97.2%(35/36)对100%(35/35)(p = 1.0,Cramer's V = 0.1),97.3个月时为97.2%(35/36)对94.3%(33/35)(p = 1.0,Cramer's V = 0.07),6个月时为91.7%(33/36)对91.4%(32/35)(p = 0.7,Cramer's V = 0.0)。外镜组的手术时间为 57.7 分钟,显微镜组为 65.4 分钟(P = 0.08,95% CI [-16.4, 0.9],Cohen's d = 0.4)。无严重并发症。所有术前和术后听力结果均相当:结论:外显微镜下与显微镜下1型鼓室成形术的疗效相当。
{"title":"Outcomes After Exoscopic Versus Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty.","authors":"Caleb J Fan, Christian G Fritz, Jacob C Lucas, Robert M Conway, Masanari G Kato, Seilesh C Babu","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004220","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the outcomes of exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective chart review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care otology-neurotology practice.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult subjects with a diagnosis of tympanic membrane perforation from 2018 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Exoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty with cartilage + perichondrium or perichondrium/fascia graft.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were graft success rate (1 wk, 3 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo postoperatively) and operative time. Secondary outcomes included audiometric outcomes of postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), change in ABG, pure tone average (PTA), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS) at 6-month follow-up and complication rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial nerve injury, persistent tinnitus, and persistent vertigo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty by a single surgeon. Thirty-six patients underwent exoscopic tympanoplasty, and 35 patients underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Cartilage and perichondrium were utilized in 27 subjects (75.0%) in the exoscopic group and in 25 subjects (71.4%) in the microscopic group (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.04). Graft success rate was as follows (exoscope versus microscope): 100% (36/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 1 week (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.0), 97.2% (35/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 3 weeks (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.1), 97.2% (35/36) versus 94.3% (33/35) at 3 months (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.07), and 91.7% (33/36) versus 91.4% (32/35) at 6 months (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.0). Operative time was 57.7 minutes for the exoscopic group and 65.4 minutes for the microscopic group (p = 0.08, 95% CI [-16.4, 0.9], Cohen's d = 0.4). There were no serious complications. All preoperative and postoperative audiometric outcomes were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcomes after exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty are comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resonance Frequency Analysis Identifies Implant- and Host-Related Factors Associated With Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant Stability. 共振频率分析确定了与骨嵌合听力植入体稳定性相关的植入体和宿主相关因素。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004213
Aren Bezdjian, Nicholas Mikolajewicz, Carolyn Denton, Alice Bouchard, Maximilian Rummler, Bernd Gludovatz, Mihee Shin, Elizabeth Zimmermann, Samer Salameh, Sam J Daniel, Bettina M Willie

Hypothesis: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a reliable, noninvasive method to assess the stability of bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs), although surgical-, implant-, and host-related factors can affect its outcome.

Background: BAHI plays an important role in restoring hearing function. However, implant- and host-related factors contribute to premature implant extrusion. To mitigate this, noninvasive methods to assess implant stability, along with a better understanding of factors contributing to BAHI failure, are needed.

Methods: We evaluated the utility of RFA to quantify implant stability in sawbone (bone mimicking material), 29 human cadaveric samples, and a prospective cohort of 29 pediatric and 27 adult participants, and identified factors associated with implant stability. To validate the use of RFA in BAHI, we compared RFA-derived implant stability quotient (ISQ) estimates to peak loads obtained from mechanical push-out testing.

Results: ISQ and peak loads were significantly correlated (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.0088), and ISQ reliably predicted peak load up to 1 kN. We then showed that in cadaveric samples, abutment length, internal table bone volume, and donor age were significantly associated with implant stability. We validated findings in our prospective patient cohort and showed that minimally invasive Ponto surgery (MIPS; versus linear incision), longer implantation durations (>16 wk), older age (>25 yr), and shorter abutment lengths (≤10 mm) were associated with better implant stability. Finally, we characterized the short-term reproducibility of ISQ measurements in sawbone and patient implants.

Conclusions: Together, our findings support the use of ISQ as a measure of implant stability and emphasize important considerations that impact implant stability, including surgical method, implant duration, age, and abutment lengths.

假设:背景:共振频率分析(RFA)是评估骨定位听力植入体(BAHI)稳定性的一种可靠、无创的方法,但手术、植入体和宿主相关因素都会影响其结果:背景:BAHI 在恢复听力功能方面发挥着重要作用。背景:BAHI 在恢复听力功能方面发挥着重要作用,但植入物和宿主相关因素会导致植入物过早挤出。为了缓解这一问题,需要采用无创方法来评估植入体的稳定性,同时更好地了解导致 BAHI 失效的因素:我们评估了 RFA 在锯骨(骨模拟材料)、29 例人体尸体样本、29 例儿童和 27 例成人前瞻性队列中量化种植体稳定性的实用性,并确定了与种植体稳定性相关的因素。为了验证RFA在BAHI中的应用,我们将RFA得出的种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)估计值与机械推出测试得出的峰值载荷进行了比较:结果:ISQ 和峰值载荷有明显的相关性(Spearman rho = 0.48,p = 0.0088),ISQ 可以可靠地预测高达 1 kN 的峰值载荷。然后,我们在尸体样本中发现,基台长度、内台骨量和供体年龄与种植体的稳定性密切相关。我们在前瞻性患者队列中对研究结果进行了验证,结果表明,微创 Ponto 手术(MIPS;相对于线性切口)、较长的植入时间(>16 周)、较大的年龄(>25 岁)和较短的基台长度(≤10 毫米)与较好的植入稳定性相关。最后,我们对锯骨和患者种植体的 ISQ 测量结果进行了短期再现性分析:总之,我们的研究结果支持使用 ISQ 作为衡量种植体稳定性的标准,并强调了影响种植体稳定性的重要因素,包括手术方法、种植体持续时间、年龄和基台长度。
{"title":"Resonance Frequency Analysis Identifies Implant- and Host-Related Factors Associated With Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant Stability.","authors":"Aren Bezdjian, Nicholas Mikolajewicz, Carolyn Denton, Alice Bouchard, Maximilian Rummler, Bernd Gludovatz, Mihee Shin, Elizabeth Zimmermann, Samer Salameh, Sam J Daniel, Bettina M Willie","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004213","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a reliable, noninvasive method to assess the stability of bone-anchored hearing implants (BAHIs), although surgical-, implant-, and host-related factors can affect its outcome.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>BAHI plays an important role in restoring hearing function. However, implant- and host-related factors contribute to premature implant extrusion. To mitigate this, noninvasive methods to assess implant stability, along with a better understanding of factors contributing to BAHI failure, are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the utility of RFA to quantify implant stability in sawbone (bone mimicking material), 29 human cadaveric samples, and a prospective cohort of 29 pediatric and 27 adult participants, and identified factors associated with implant stability. To validate the use of RFA in BAHI, we compared RFA-derived implant stability quotient (ISQ) estimates to peak loads obtained from mechanical push-out testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ISQ and peak loads were significantly correlated (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.0088), and ISQ reliably predicted peak load up to 1 kN. We then showed that in cadaveric samples, abutment length, internal table bone volume, and donor age were significantly associated with implant stability. We validated findings in our prospective patient cohort and showed that minimally invasive Ponto surgery (MIPS; versus linear incision), longer implantation durations (>16 wk), older age (>25 yr), and shorter abutment lengths (≤10 mm) were associated with better implant stability. Finally, we characterized the short-term reproducibility of ISQ measurements in sawbone and patient implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, our findings support the use of ISQ as a measure of implant stability and emphasize important considerations that impact implant stability, including surgical method, implant duration, age, and abutment lengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochlear Implant Device Failures Falling Under the 2020 FDA Voluntary Field Corrective Action: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 属于 2020 年 FDA 自愿性现场纠正行动范围内的人工耳蜗植入设备故障:系统回顾与元分析》。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224
Aparna Govindan, Mia Saade, Enrique R Perez, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti, Zachary G Schwam

Objective: To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).

Databases reviewed: Medline, Embase, and Scopus.

Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.

Results: Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).

Conclusions: The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.

目的比较 2020 年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)自愿现场纠正行动(VFCA)中涉及的人工耳蜗(CI)的设备故障率:Medline、Embase 和 Scopus:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述。方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了一项系统性综述,纳入了报告受 VFCA 影响的植入物的机构经验的文献。评估的结果包括故障病因、故障率、故障时间以及设备故障前后的言语感知测试。至少两项独立研究中报告的所有结果均纳入荟萃分析:结果:六项研究符合分析标准。总体合并失败率为 23.7%(95% CI,11.6-38.4%)。汇总的设备、不确定和医疗失败率分别为 21.5%、0.2% 和 0.7%。儿科失败率高于成人(46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] 对 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%])。WRS随初次种植失败而下降(从55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%]降至34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]),但在再次种植后有所改善(从34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]降至50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]):结论:迄今为止,文献报道的 2020 VFCA 下的 CI 失败率为 23.7%。其中绝大多数失败与设备有关,儿童的失败率更高。重新植入后,语音感知明显改善。
{"title":"Cochlear Implant Device Failures Falling Under the 2020 FDA Voluntary Field Corrective Action: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Aparna Govindan, Mia Saade, Enrique R Perez, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti, Zachary G Schwam","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>Medline, Embase, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Chinese Americans. 人工耳蜗植入对美籍华人生活质量的影响。
IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004207
Caleb J Fan, Maria A Mavrommatis, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti

Objectives: To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans after cochlear implantation (CI) using the cross-culturally adapted Chinese Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global.

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Tertiary care neurotology practice in New York City.

Patients: Thirty adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans (22.8-89.4 yr, mean 48.9 yr) with prelingual (12) or postlingual (18) deafness who underwent CI between 1995 and 2020. All patients were at least 1 year from CI activation.

Intervention: CI.

Main outcomes measures: Chinese CIQOL-10 Global score.

Results: There were no detectable differences in mean Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores between the prelingual (mean 51.9, SD 11.0) and postlingual (mean 44.0, SD 16.4) cohorts (p = 0.1; 95% CI, -2.3 to 18.1; Hedges' g = 0.5). Comparison of the overall cohort (mean 47.1, SD 14.8) with previously published CIQOL-10 Global scores of English-speaking American CI users (mean 51.5, SD 10.4) demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.4-8.4; Hedges' g = 0.4). For the overall cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated that combined household income (p = 0.007, β = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.7-14.0) was positively associated with Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores.

Conclusions: This study is the first to evaluate QOL after CI in Mandarin-speaking Chinese American adults. The CIQOL-10 Global scores of Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans CI users are significantly worse than those of English-speaking American CI users. Combined household income may be positively associated with QOL in the Mandarin-speaking Chinese American CI population. More resources are needed to assess outcomes and support rehabilitation in this population.

目的研究设计:横断面:横断面:患者:30 位讲普通话的成年华人:30 位讲普通话的成年美籍华人(22.8-89.4 岁,平均 48.9 岁),患有舌前(12 位)或舌后(18 位)耳聋,在 1995 年至 2020 年期间接受了人工耳蜗植入术。干预措施:CI:干预措施:CI:中文 CIQOL-10 全球评分:结果:舌前队列(平均 51.9,SD 11.0)和舌后队列(平均 44.0,SD 16.4)之间的中文 CIQOL-10 Global 平均得分没有发现差异(p = 0.1;95% CI,-2.3 至 18.1;Hedges' g = 0.5)。将总体队列(平均 47.1 分,标准差 14.8 分)与之前公布的讲英语的美国 CI 用户的 CIQOL-10 全球评分(平均 51.5 分,标准差 10.4 分)进行比较,结果显示两者之间存在显著差异(p = 0.02;95% CI,0.4-8.4;Hedges' g = 0.4)。对整个队列进行的多变量分析表明,综合家庭收入(p = 0.007,β = 7.4;95% CI,0.7-14.0)与中国人的 CIQOL-10 全球评分呈正相关:本研究首次评估了讲普通话的美国华裔成人 CI 后的 QOL。讲普通话的美籍华人 CI 用户的 CIQOL-10 Global 分数明显低于讲英语的美籍 CI 用户。在讲普通话的美籍华人 CI 群体中,家庭总收入可能与 QOL 呈正相关。需要更多的资源来评估该人群的康复效果并为其提供康复支持。
{"title":"Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Chinese Americans.","authors":"Caleb J Fan, Maria A Mavrommatis, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004207","DOIUrl":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004207","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans after cochlear implantation (CI) using the cross-culturally adapted Chinese Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care neurotology practice in New York City.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Thirty adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans (22.8-89.4 yr, mean 48.9 yr) with prelingual (12) or postlingual (18) deafness who underwent CI between 1995 and 2020. All patients were at least 1 year from CI activation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>CI.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Chinese CIQOL-10 Global score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no detectable differences in mean Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores between the prelingual (mean 51.9, SD 11.0) and postlingual (mean 44.0, SD 16.4) cohorts (p = 0.1; 95% CI, -2.3 to 18.1; Hedges' g = 0.5). Comparison of the overall cohort (mean 47.1, SD 14.8) with previously published CIQOL-10 Global scores of English-speaking American CI users (mean 51.5, SD 10.4) demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.4-8.4; Hedges' g = 0.4). For the overall cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated that combined household income (p = 0.007, β = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.7-14.0) was positively associated with Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate QOL after CI in Mandarin-speaking Chinese American adults. The CIQOL-10 Global scores of Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans CI users are significantly worse than those of English-speaking American CI users. Combined household income may be positively associated with QOL in the Mandarin-speaking Chinese American CI population. More resources are needed to assess outcomes and support rehabilitation in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Otology & Neurotology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1