首页 > 最新文献

Pain and Therapy最新文献

英文 中文
Microbial Symphony: Exploring the Role of the Gut in Osteoarthritis-Related Pain. A Narrative Review 微生物交响曲:探索肠道在骨关节炎相关疼痛中的作用。叙述性综述
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00602-9
Alberto Corriero, Mariateresa Giglio, Rossana Soloperto, Francesco Inchingolo, Giustino Varrassi, Filomena Puntillo

One of the most common musculoskeletal disorders, osteoarthritis (OA), causes worldwide disability, morbidity, and poor quality of life by degenerating articular cartilage, modifying subchondral bone, and inflaming synovial membranes. OA pathogenesis pathways must be understood to generate new preventative and disease-modifying therapies. In recent years, it has been acknowledged that gut microbiota (GM) can significantly contribute to the development of OA. Dysbiosis of GM can disrupt the “symphony” between the host and the GM, leading to a host immunological response that activates the “gut–joint” axis, ultimately worsening OA. This narrative review summarizes research supporting the “gut–joint axis” hypothesis, focusing on the interactions between GM and the immune system in its two main components, innate and adaptive immunity. Furthermore, the pathophysiological sequence of events that link GM imbalance to OA and OA-related pain is broken down and further investigated. We also suggest that diet and prebiotics, probiotics, nutraceuticals, exercise, and fecal microbiota transplantation could improve OA management and represent a new potential therapeutic tool in the light of the scarce panorama of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs). Future research is needed to elucidate these complex interactions, prioritizing how a particular change in GM, i.e., a rise or a drop of a specific bacterial strain, correlates with a certain OA subset to pinpoint the associated signaling pathway that leads to OA.

骨关节炎(OA)是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一,它通过使关节软骨退化、软骨下骨改变和滑膜发炎,导致全球范围内的残疾、发病率和生活质量下降。必须了解 OA 的发病机制,才能开发出新的预防和改善疾病的疗法。近年来,人们已认识到肠道微生物群(GM)对 OA 的发病有重要影响。肠道微生物菌群失调会破坏宿主与肠道微生物菌群之间的 "交响乐",导致宿主免疫反应,激活 "肠道-关节 "轴,最终加重 OA。本综述总结了支持 "肠道-关节轴 "假说的研究,重点关注转基因与免疫系统之间的相互作用,包括先天性免疫和适应性免疫两个主要组成部分。此外,我们还对将全球机制失衡与 OA 和 OA 相关疼痛联系起来的病理生理学事件序列进行了细分和进一步研究。我们还建议,饮食和益生元、益生菌、营养保健品、运动和粪便微生物群移植可以改善 OA 的管理,并在改变疾病的骨关节炎药物(DMOADs)稀缺的情况下成为一种新的潜在治疗工具。未来的研究需要阐明这些复杂的相互作用,优先考虑基因组中的特定变化(即特定细菌菌株的增加或减少)如何与特定的 OA 亚群相关联,以确定导致 OA 的相关信号通路。
{"title":"Microbial Symphony: Exploring the Role of the Gut in Osteoarthritis-Related Pain. A Narrative Review","authors":"Alberto Corriero, Mariateresa Giglio, Rossana Soloperto, Francesco Inchingolo, Giustino Varrassi, Filomena Puntillo","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00602-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00602-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the most common musculoskeletal disorders, osteoarthritis (OA), causes worldwide disability, morbidity, and poor quality of life by degenerating articular cartilage, modifying subchondral bone, and inflaming synovial membranes. OA pathogenesis pathways must be understood to generate new preventative and disease-modifying therapies. In recent years, it has been acknowledged that gut microbiota (GM) can significantly contribute to the development of OA. Dysbiosis of GM can disrupt the “symphony” between the host and the GM, leading to a host immunological response that activates the “gut–joint” axis, ultimately worsening OA. This narrative review summarizes research supporting the “gut–joint axis” hypothesis, focusing on the interactions between GM and the immune system in its two main components, innate and adaptive immunity. Furthermore, the pathophysiological sequence of events that link GM imbalance to OA and OA-related pain is broken down and further investigated. We also suggest that diet and prebiotics, probiotics, nutraceuticals, exercise, and fecal microbiota transplantation could improve OA management and represent a new potential therapeutic tool in the light of the scarce panorama of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs). Future research is needed to elucidate these complex interactions, prioritizing how a particular change in GM, i.e., a rise or a drop of a specific bacterial strain, correlates with a certain OA subset to pinpoint the associated signaling pathway that leads to OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140810145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Medicinal Cannabis as an Emerging Therapy for Opioid Use Disorder 药用大麻作为阿片类药物使用障碍新兴疗法的作用
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00599-1
Kelvin Le, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Johnny Nguyen, Jean Hua, Sarah Munday

This narrative review explores current insights into the potential use of medicinal cannabis-related products as an emerging therapy for opioid use disorder in the landscape of increasing knowledge about medicinal cannabis-based products, commercialisation and global legalisation. Preclinical studies have provided preliminary insight into the putative neurobiological mechanisms that underpin the potential for medicinal cannabis to be considered a therapeutic in opioid use disorder and addiction. With the progressive legalisation of cannabis in many jurisdictions worldwide, contemporary research has highlighted further evidence that medicinal cannabis may have efficacy in reducing cravings and withdrawal effects, and therefore may be considered as an adjunct or standalone to current medications for opioid use disorder. Despite this potential, the landscape of research in this space draws from a large number of observational studies, with a paucity of rigorous randomised controlled trials to ascertain a true understanding of effect size and safety profile. With current challenges in implementation that arise from political and legal qualms about adopting medicinal cannabis on the background of associated social stigma, significant hurdles remain to be addressed by government, policy-makers, healthcare providers and researchers before medical cannabis can be introduced globally for the treatment of opioid use disorder.

随着人们对基于药用大麻的产品、商业化和全球合法化的了解不断增加,本综述探讨了目前对药用大麻相关产品作为阿片类药物使用障碍的新兴疗法的潜在用途的见解。临床前研究初步揭示了支撑药用大麻被视为治疗阿片类药物使用障碍和成瘾的潜在神经生物学机制。随着大麻在全球许多司法管辖区逐步合法化,当代研究进一步突出了药用大麻在减少渴求和戒断效应方面可能具有疗效的证据,因此可被视为目前治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的辅助药物或独立药物。尽管具有这种潜力,但这一领域的研究主要来自大量观察性研究,很少有严格的随机对照试验来真正了解其效果大小和安全性。目前,由于相关的社会污名对采用药用大麻存在政治和法律上的疑虑,因此在全球范围内引入医用大麻治疗阿片类药物使用障碍之前,政府、政策制定者、医疗服务提供者和研究人员仍需克服重大障碍,应对实施过程中的挑战。
{"title":"The Role of Medicinal Cannabis as an Emerging Therapy for Opioid Use Disorder","authors":"Kelvin Le, Khang Duy Ricky Le, Johnny Nguyen, Jean Hua, Sarah Munday","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00599-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00599-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This narrative review explores current insights into the potential use of medicinal cannabis-related products as an emerging therapy for opioid use disorder in the landscape of increasing knowledge about medicinal cannabis-based products, commercialisation and global legalisation. Preclinical studies have provided preliminary insight into the putative neurobiological mechanisms that underpin the potential for medicinal cannabis to be considered a therapeutic in opioid use disorder and addiction. With the progressive legalisation of cannabis in many jurisdictions worldwide, contemporary research has highlighted further evidence that medicinal cannabis may have efficacy in reducing cravings and withdrawal effects, and therefore may be considered as an adjunct or standalone to current medications for opioid use disorder. Despite this potential, the landscape of research in this space draws from a large number of observational studies, with a paucity of rigorous randomised controlled trials to ascertain a true understanding of effect size and safety profile. With current challenges in implementation that arise from political and legal qualms about adopting medicinal cannabis on the background of associated social stigma, significant hurdles remain to be addressed by government, policy-makers, healthcare providers and researchers before medical cannabis can be introduced globally for the treatment of opioid use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140802138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Treatment Patterns, Migraine Burden, and Healthcare Resource Use in People With Migraine: Results From the OVERCOME (EU) Observational Study 偏头痛患者的急性治疗模式、偏头痛负担和医疗资源使用情况:OVERCOME(欧盟)观察研究的结果
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00589-3
Stefan Evers, Grazia Dell’Agnello, Diego Novick, H. Saygin Gonderten, Tommaso Panni, Julio Pascual

Introduction

The ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME) European Union (EU) is part of an overarching population-based study program that also includes the United States and Japan. Here, we report data on the migraine/severe headache burden and the use of acute medication and healthcare resources in Spain and Germany.

Methods

OVERCOME (EU) was an online, non-interventional, cross-sectional survey conducted in adults in Spain and Germany between October 2020 and February 2021. A total migraine cohort was established based on health survey participants who reported headache/migraine in the last 12 months AND identified as having migraine based on modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition criteria OR self-reported physician diagnosis. Data were analyzed for the total migraine cohort and the subcohort with moderate to severe headache attacks, with average pain severity ≥ 5 points, pain duration ≥ 4 h, and at least moderate disability due to migraine [Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11] over the past 3 months.

Results

Pain of moderate or severe intensity was the most frequent symptom in the total migraine cohort (n = 19,103/20,756; 92.0%). Proportions of participants reporting severe disability (MIDAS Grade IV), poorer quality of life (QoL; Migraine-Specific QoL Questionnaire), and higher interictal burden (Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4), generally increased with number of headache days (HDs)/month. Most participants (92.5%) reported current acute migraine/severe headache medication use, although only 39.0% were using triptans. In the moderate to severe attacks subcohort (n = 5547), 48.4% were using triptans, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs the most common acute medication. The moderate to severe attacks subcohort also reported poorer QoL and greater pain and disability with increasing HDs/month, although severe interictal burden was reported for ~ 60% of participants regardless of HDs/month. Treatment satisfaction (six-item migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire) in those using triptans was generally poor in both total and subcohorts.

Conclusion

High migraine-related burden levels were reported, despite use of acute medication. Although triptans are recommended for moderate to severe migraine attacks in Spanish and German guidelines, less than half of participants were using triptans; treatment satisfaction in those using triptans was generally poor. New tailored treatment options may help address unmet needs in current acute treatment.

导言:欧洲联盟(欧盟)偏头痛流行病学、治疗和护理观察调查(OVERCOME)是以人口为基础的总体研究计划的一部分,该计划还包括美国和日本。在此,我们报告了西班牙和德国的偏头痛/严重头痛负担以及急性药物和医疗资源使用情况的数据。方法OVERCOME (EU) 是一项在线、非干预性、横断面调查,于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在西班牙和德国的成年人中进行。根据健康调查参与者在过去 12 个月中报告的头痛/偏头痛情况,以及根据修改后的《国际头痛疾病分类》第三版标准或自我报告的医生诊断确定为偏头痛的情况,建立了偏头痛总体队列。对偏头痛总队列和中度至重度头痛发作亚队列的数据进行了分析,中度至重度头痛发作亚队列在过去 3 个月中平均疼痛程度≥ 5 分,疼痛持续时间≥ 4 小时,至少因偏头痛导致中度残疾[偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)评分≥ 11]。报告严重残疾(MIDAS IV级)、较差的生活质量(QoL;偏头痛专用QoL问卷)和较高的发作间期负担(偏头痛发作间期负担量表-4)的参与者比例随着头痛天数(HDs)/月而增加。大多数参与者(92.5%)表示目前正在使用急性偏头痛/严重头痛药物,但只有39.0%的人使用三苯氧胺。在中度至重度发作亚组(n = 5547)中,48.4%的人使用曲坦类药物,非甾体抗炎药是最常见的急性药物。中度至重度发作亚群还报告说,随着 HDs/month 的增加,患者的 QoL 更差,疼痛和残疾程度更高,但无论 HDs/month 如何增加,约有 60% 的参与者报告说存在严重的发作间期负担。总队列和亚队列中使用三苯氧胺的患者的治疗满意度(六项偏头痛治疗优化问卷)普遍较低。尽管西班牙和德国的指南推荐中度至重度偏头痛发作时使用三苯氧胺,但只有不到一半的参与者使用三苯氧胺;使用三苯氧胺者的治疗满意度普遍较低。新的定制治疗方案可能有助于解决目前急性治疗中尚未满足的需求。
{"title":"Acute Treatment Patterns, Migraine Burden, and Healthcare Resource Use in People With Migraine: Results From the OVERCOME (EU) Observational Study","authors":"Stefan Evers, Grazia Dell’Agnello, Diego Novick, H. Saygin Gonderten, Tommaso Panni, Julio Pascual","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00589-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00589-3","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>The ObserVational survey of the Epidemiology, tReatment and Care Of MigrainE (OVERCOME) European Union (EU) is part of an overarching population-based study program that also includes the United States and Japan. Here, we report data on the migraine/severe headache burden and the use of acute medication and healthcare resources in Spain and Germany.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>OVERCOME (EU) was an online, non-interventional, cross-sectional survey conducted in adults in Spain and Germany between October 2020 and February 2021. A total migraine cohort was established based on health survey participants who reported headache/migraine in the last 12 months AND identified as having migraine based on modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition criteria OR self-reported physician diagnosis. Data were analyzed for the total migraine cohort and the subcohort with moderate to severe headache attacks, with average pain severity ≥ 5 points, pain duration ≥ 4 h, and at least moderate disability due to migraine [Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11] over the past 3 months.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Pain of moderate or severe intensity was the most frequent symptom in the total migraine cohort (<i>n</i> = 19,103/20,756; 92.0%). Proportions of participants reporting severe disability (MIDAS Grade IV), poorer quality of life (QoL; Migraine-Specific QoL Questionnaire), and higher interictal burden (Migraine Interictal Burden Scale-4), generally increased with number of headache days (HDs)/month. Most participants (92.5%) reported current acute migraine/severe headache medication use, although only 39.0% were using triptans. In the moderate to severe attacks subcohort (<i>n</i> = 5547), 48.4% were using triptans, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs the most common acute medication. The moderate to severe attacks subcohort also reported poorer QoL and greater pain and disability with increasing HDs/month, although severe interictal burden was reported for ~ 60% of participants regardless of HDs/month. Treatment satisfaction (six-item migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire) in those using triptans was generally poor in both total and subcohorts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>High migraine-related burden levels were reported, despite use of acute medication. Although triptans are recommended for moderate to severe migraine attacks in Spanish and German guidelines, less than half of participants were using triptans; treatment satisfaction in those using triptans was generally poor. New tailored treatment options may help address unmet needs in current acute treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140570441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Postoperative Analgesia of Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Radical Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial 胸腔镜引导下胸椎旁阻滞与超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞在胸腔镜肺癌根治术术后镇痛中的比较:随机对照试验
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00593-7
Xia Xu, Ying-xin Xie, Meng Zhang, Jian-hui Du, Jin-xian He, Li-hong Hu

Introduction

Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UTPB) is widely used for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery. However, it has many disadvantages. Thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB) is a new technique for thoracic paravertebral block (TPB). In this study, we compared the use of TTPB and UTPB for pain management after thoracoscopic radical surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

In total, 80 patients were randomly divided 1:1 into the UTPB group and the TTPB group. The surgical time of TPB, the success rate of the first puncture, block segment range, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post operation, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

The surgical time of TPB was significantly shorter in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 min, t = − 12.411, P < 0.001). The success rate of the first puncture and the sensory block segment were significantly higher in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (100% vs. 76.9%, χ2 = 8.309, P < 0.001; 6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.3 levels, t = − 5.306, P < 0.001, respectively). The VAS scores were significantly higher during rest and coughing at 48 h post operation than at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group. The VAS scores were significantly lower during rest and coughing at 12 and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (rest: 2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6, t = 7.325, P < 0.001; 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6, t = 7.885, P < 0.001; coughing: 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, t = 5.057, P < 0.001; 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8, t = 4.625, P < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.

Conclusions

Compared with UTPB, TTPB shows advantages, such as simpler and more convenient surgery, shorter surgical time, a higher success rate of the first puncture, wider block segments, and superior analgesic effect. TTPB can effectively reduce postoperative pain due to thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery.

Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300072005, prospectively registered on 31/05/2023.

导言超声引导下胸椎旁阻滞(UTPB)被广泛用于胸外科手术的术后镇痛。然而,它也有许多缺点。胸腔镜引导下胸椎旁阻滞(TTPB)是胸椎旁阻滞(TPB)的一种新技术。本研究比较了 TTPB 和 UTPB 在胸腔镜肺癌根治术后疼痛治疗中的应用。结果 TTPB 组的手术时间明显短于 UTPB 组(2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 min,t = - 12.411,P < 0.001)。UTPB组的首次穿刺成功率和感觉阻滞段明显高于UTPB组(分别为100% vs. 76.9%,χ2 = 8.309,P < 0.001;6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.3水平,t = - 5.306,P < 0.001)。TTPB 组术后 48 小时休息和咳嗽时的 VAS 评分明显高于术后 2、6、12 和 24 小时。UTPB组术后12和24小时休息和咳嗽时的VAS评分明显低于UTPB组(休息:2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6,t = 7.325,P < 0.001; 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6,t = 7.885,P <;0.001;咳嗽:分别为 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7,t = 5.057,P <;0.001;3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8,t = 4.625,P <;0.001)。结论与UTPB相比,UTPB具有手术简单方便、手术时间短、首次穿刺成功率高、阻滞区段宽、镇痛效果好等优点。TTPB可有效减轻胸腔镜肺癌根治术的术后疼痛。试验注册https://www.chictr.org.cn,标识符为ChiCTR2300072005,前瞻性注册日期为2023年5月31日。
{"title":"Comparison of Thoracoscopy-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Postoperative Analgesia of Thoracoscopic Lung Cancer Radical Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Xia Xu, Ying-xin Xie, Meng Zhang, Jian-hui Du, Jin-xian He, Li-hong Hu","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00593-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00593-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UTPB) is widely used for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery. However, it has many disadvantages. Thoracoscopy-guided thoracic paravertebral block (TTPB) is a new technique for thoracic paravertebral block (TPB). In this study, we compared the use of TTPB and UTPB for pain management after thoracoscopic radical surgery for lung cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In total, 80 patients were randomly divided 1:1 into the UTPB group and the TTPB group. The surgical time of TPB, the success rate of the first puncture, block segment range, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post operation, and the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The surgical time of TPB was significantly shorter in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (2.2 ± 0.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 min, <i>t</i> = − 12.411, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The success rate of the first puncture and the sensory block segment were significantly higher in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (100% vs. 76.9%,<i> χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 8.309, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; 6.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.3 levels, <i>t</i> = − 5.306, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). The VAS scores were significantly higher during rest and coughing at 48 h post operation than at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group. The VAS scores were significantly lower during rest and coughing at 12 and 24 h post operation in the TTPB group than in the UTPB group (rest: 2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 3.4 ± 0.6, <i>t</i> = 7.325, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6, <i>t</i> = 7.885, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; coughing: 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7, <i>t</i> = 5.057, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; 3.4 ± 0.6 vs. 4.2 ± 0.8, <i>t</i> = 4.625, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with UTPB, TTPB shows advantages, such as simpler and more convenient surgery, shorter surgical time, a higher success rate of the first puncture, wider block segments, and superior analgesic effect. TTPB can effectively reduce postoperative pain due to thoracoscopic lung cancer radical surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial Registration</h3><p>https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300072005, prospectively registered on 31/05/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140570342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Range of Motion Deficit and Recurrence of Pain After Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis. 粘连性囊炎治疗后活动范围不足与疼痛复发的关系
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00578-6
Jung Hwan Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Min Cheol Chang

Introduction: We evaluated the factors influencing the duration of significant pain reduction after conservative management for adhesive capsulitis (AC).

Methods: Follow-up for 6-8 months was performed with 141 patients with AC who experienced significant pain reduction after treatment. Clinical and demographic factors, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were collected and assessed pretreatment (T0), at 5 weeks post-treatment (T1), and at 6-8 months post-treatment (T2). Patients were divided into successful (n = 96) and unsuccessful (n = 45) NRS groups according to the degree of pain reduction at T2. We assessed post-treatment NRS and ROM improvement scores within each group and compared these parameters between the two groups.

Results: Significant NRS and ROM improvements were achieved in all patients who participated in our study. The unsuccessful NRS group demonstrated a lack of significant improvement in abduction at T1 and T2. All T1 and shoulder ROM measurements among the unsuccessful NRS group were significantly smaller than those among the successful NRS group.

Conclusions: Failure to achieve a significant improvement in abduction angle after conservative management of AC was significantly associated with pain recurrence.

引言我们评估了影响粘连性关节囊炎(AC)保守治疗后疼痛明显减轻持续时间的因素:我们对 141 名经治疗后疼痛明显减轻的粘连性关节囊炎患者进行了 6-8 个月的随访。收集并评估了治疗前(T0)、治疗后 5 周(T1)和治疗后 6-8 个月(T2)的临床和人口统计学因素、数字评分量表(NRS)评分和肩关节活动范围(ROM)。根据 T2 时疼痛减轻的程度,将患者分为 NRS 成功组(96 人)和 NRS 不成功组(45 人)。我们对每组患者治疗后的 NRS 和 ROM 改善评分进行了评估,并对两组患者的这些参数进行了比较:结果:所有参与研究的患者的 NRS 和 ROM 均有明显改善。NRS不成功组在T1和T2外展方面没有明显改善。NRS不成功组的所有T1和肩关节ROM测量值均明显小于NRS成功组:结论:前交叉韧带保守治疗后,外展角度未能得到明显改善与疼痛复发密切相关。
{"title":"Association of Range of Motion Deficit and Recurrence of Pain After Treatment of Adhesive Capsulitis.","authors":"Jung Hwan Lee, Jun Ho Lee, Min Cheol Chang","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00578-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00578-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We evaluated the factors influencing the duration of significant pain reduction after conservative management for adhesive capsulitis (AC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Follow-up for 6-8 months was performed with 141 patients with AC who experienced significant pain reduction after treatment. Clinical and demographic factors, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were collected and assessed pretreatment (T0), at 5 weeks post-treatment (T1), and at 6-8 months post-treatment (T2). Patients were divided into successful (n = 96) and unsuccessful (n = 45) NRS groups according to the degree of pain reduction at T2. We assessed post-treatment NRS and ROM improvement scores within each group and compared these parameters between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant NRS and ROM improvements were achieved in all patients who participated in our study. The unsuccessful NRS group demonstrated a lack of significant improvement in abduction at T1 and T2. All T1 and shoulder ROM measurements among the unsuccessful NRS group were significantly smaller than those among the successful NRS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure to achieve a significant improvement in abduction angle after conservative management of AC was significantly associated with pain recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928039/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139692636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intraoperative Opioid Waste and Association of Intraoperative Opioid Dose with Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Hospital Registry Study. 术中阿片类药物浪费及术中阿片类药物剂量与术后不良后果的关系:一项医院登记研究。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-28 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00574-2
Simone Redaelli, Aiman Suleiman, Dario von Wedel, Sarah Ashrafian, Ricardo Munoz-Acuna, Guanqing Chen, Mitra Khany, Catriona Stewart, Nikolai Ratajczak, John Hertig, Sarah Nabel, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran

Introduction: Perioperative opioid use has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Additionally, opioid disposal carries significant costs, due to the waste of pharmaceutical products and the time needed by skilled labor to report the waste. In this study, we aimed to estimate costs and predict factors of opioid-associated intraoperative product waste, as well as to evaluate whether higher intraoperative opioid doses are associated with increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.

Methods: We included 170,607 patients undergoing general anesthesia and receiving intraoperative fentanyl, hydromorphone, or morphine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between January 2010 and June 2020. We estimated product waste-associated costs based on various opioid syringe sizes and determined predictors of opioid waste. Further, we evaluated whether higher opioid doses were associated with postoperative adverse events according to the severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program classification. The primary outcome included post-extubation desaturation, postoperative nausea or vomiting, or postoperative somnolence or sedation.

Results: The use of the smallest syringe sizes (50 mcg for fentanyl, 0.2 mg for hydromorphone, and 2 mg for morphine) resulted in the lowest product waste-associated costs. The main predictor of opioid waste was the administration of more than one intraoperative opioid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.64, 95% CI 7.40-7.89, P < 0.001). Intraoperative doses of fentanyl > 50-100 mcg (aOR = 1.17 [1.10-1.25], P < 0.001, adjusted risk difference [ARD] 2%) and > 100 mcg (aOR = 1.24 [1.16-1.33], P < 0.001, ARD 3%), hydromorphone > 1 mg (aOR = 1.13 [1.06-1.20], P < 0.001, ARD 2%), and morphine > 2-4 mg (aOR = 1.26 [1.02-1.56], P = 0.04, ARD 3%) and > 4 mg (aOR = 1.45 [1.18-1.77], P < 0.001, ARD 5%) were associated with higher risk of the primary outcome.

Conclusion: Smaller syringe sizes of intraoperative opioids may help to reduce product waste and associated costs, as well postoperative adverse events through utilization of lower intraoperative opioid doses.

导言:围手术期阿片类药物的使用与不良临床结果有关。此外,阿片类药物的处理也需要大量成本,这是因为药品的浪费和熟练劳动力报告浪费所需的时间。在这项研究中,我们旨在估算阿片类药物相关术中产品浪费的成本和预测因素,并评估术中阿片类药物剂量增加是否与术后不良预后风险增加有关:我们纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间在美国马萨诸塞州波士顿贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心接受全身麻醉并在术中使用芬太尼、氢吗啡酮或吗啡的 170,607 名患者。我们根据不同的阿片注射器规格估算了产品浪费相关成本,并确定了阿片浪费的预测因素。此外,我们还根据基于严重程度指数、事故报告的用药错误报告计划分类,评估了较高阿片类药物剂量是否与术后不良事件相关。主要结果包括拔管后不饱和、术后恶心或呕吐、术后嗜睡或镇静:结果:使用最小规格的注射器(芬太尼为 50 微克,氢吗啡酮为 0.2 毫克,吗啡为 2 毫克)产生的产品浪费相关成本最低。阿片类药物浪费的主要预测因素是术中使用一种以上的阿片类药物(调整后的几率比 [aOR] = 7.64,95% CI 7.40-7.89,P 50-100 毫克(aOR = 1.17 [1.10-1.25],P 100 毫克(aOR = 1.24 [1.16-1.33],P 1 毫克(aOR = 1.13 [1.06-1.20],P 2-4 毫克(aOR = 1.26 [1.02-1.56],P = 0.04,ARD 3%)和 > 4 毫克(aOR = 1.45 [1.18-1.77],P 结论:术中阿片类药物的注射器规格越小,可能有助于减少产品浪费和相关成本,并通过使用较低的术中阿片类药物剂量来减少术后不良事件。
{"title":"Intraoperative Opioid Waste and Association of Intraoperative Opioid Dose with Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Hospital Registry Study.","authors":"Simone Redaelli, Aiman Suleiman, Dario von Wedel, Sarah Ashrafian, Ricardo Munoz-Acuna, Guanqing Chen, Mitra Khany, Catriona Stewart, Nikolai Ratajczak, John Hertig, Sarah Nabel, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran","doi":"10.1007/s40122-023-00574-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-023-00574-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perioperative opioid use has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Additionally, opioid disposal carries significant costs, due to the waste of pharmaceutical products and the time needed by skilled labor to report the waste. In this study, we aimed to estimate costs and predict factors of opioid-associated intraoperative product waste, as well as to evaluate whether higher intraoperative opioid doses are associated with increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 170,607 patients undergoing general anesthesia and receiving intraoperative fentanyl, hydromorphone, or morphine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA, between January 2010 and June 2020. We estimated product waste-associated costs based on various opioid syringe sizes and determined predictors of opioid waste. Further, we evaluated whether higher opioid doses were associated with postoperative adverse events according to the severity-indexed, incident report-based medication error-reporting program classification. The primary outcome included post-extubation desaturation, postoperative nausea or vomiting, or postoperative somnolence or sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of the smallest syringe sizes (50 mcg for fentanyl, 0.2 mg for hydromorphone, and 2 mg for morphine) resulted in the lowest product waste-associated costs. The main predictor of opioid waste was the administration of more than one intraoperative opioid (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.64, 95% CI 7.40-7.89, P < 0.001). Intraoperative doses of fentanyl > 50-100 mcg (aOR = 1.17 [1.10-1.25], P < 0.001, adjusted risk difference [ARD] 2%) and > 100 mcg (aOR = 1.24 [1.16-1.33], P < 0.001, ARD 3%), hydromorphone > 1 mg (aOR = 1.13 [1.06-1.20], P < 0.001, ARD 2%), and morphine > 2-4 mg (aOR = 1.26 [1.02-1.56], P = 0.04, ARD 3%) and > 4 mg (aOR = 1.45 [1.18-1.77], P < 0.001, ARD 5%) were associated with higher risk of the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smaller syringe sizes of intraoperative opioids may help to reduce product waste and associated costs, as well postoperative adverse events through utilization of lower intraoperative opioid doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"211-225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928037/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Chloroprocaine for Breakthrough Pain During Labor Analgesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. 硬膜外氯普鲁卡因用于分娩镇痛期间突破性疼痛的有效性和安全性:前瞻性、双盲、随机试验。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00577-7
Tianzhen Ji, Can Jiang, Hongxia Liu, Zhehao Cai, Rongrong Liu, Lei Xie, Cheng Xu

Introduction: A significant number of women who undergo neuraxial labor analgesia experience breakthrough pain. Prompt mitigation of breakthrough pain is essential to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. We evaluated epidural chloroprocaine compared with ropivacaine in alleviating labor breakthrough pain.

Methods: We performed a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial between May and July 2023. Eligible parturients received epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil. Those with breakthrough pain were randomized to receive either 0.125% epidural ropivacaine (group R) or chloroprocaine at concentrations of 0.5% (group C1), 1.0% (group C2), or 1.5% (group C3), all in a volume of 6 mL. The primary outcome was the treatment success rate, indicated by a decrease of at least 4 points on the numerical rating scale pain score 9 min after analgesic injection. Secondary outcomes and adverse effects were also recorded.

Results: Out of 323 patients receiving epidural analgesia, 192 experienced breakthrough pain. After exclusion of three patients because of protocol deviation, there were 47, 48, 47, and 47 patients in group R, C1, C2, and C3, respectively. Group C3 demonstrated a higher treatment success rate (39/47, 83.0%) in managing breakthrough pain than group R (26/47, 55.3%), group C1 (12/48, 25.0%), and group C2 (30/47, 63.8%) (p < 0.001). Group C3 had lower numerical rating scale scores at 6 and 9 min after injection and required fewer patient-controlled epidural boluses than other groups. In addition, group C3 reported greater satisfaction than the other groups (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in obstetric or neonatal outcomes across these groups.

Conclusion: Parturients experiencing breakthrough pain could receive 1.5% epidural chloroprocaine, rather than lower chloroprocaine concentrations and ropivacaine, to achieve more rapid and better pain relief with higher patient satisfaction.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300071069, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .

介绍:在接受神经性分娩镇痛的产妇中,有相当多的人经历过突破性疼痛。及时缓解突破性疼痛对改善产妇和胎儿的预后至关重要。我们对硬膜外氯普鲁卡因与罗哌卡因在缓解分娩突破性疼痛方面的效果进行了评估:我们在 2023 年 5 月至 7 月期间进行了一项双盲随机对照临床试验。符合条件的产妇接受了罗哌卡因和舒芬太尼硬膜外镇痛。出现突破性疼痛的患者被随机分配接受 0.125% 硬膜外罗哌卡因(R 组)或浓度为 0.5%(C1 组)、1.0%(C2 组)或 1.5% (C3 组)的氯普鲁卡因,所有药物的容量均为 6 毫升。主要结果是治疗成功率,即在注射镇痛剂 9 分钟后,数字评分表疼痛评分下降至少 4 分。此外,还记录了次要结果和不良反应:在接受硬膜外镇痛的 323 名患者中,有 192 人出现了突破性疼痛。因方案偏差而排除了三名患者后,R、C1、C2 和 C3 组分别有 47、48、47 和 47 名患者。与 R 组(26/47,55.3%)、C1 组(12/48,25.0%)和 C2 组(30/47,63.8%)相比,C3 组在控制突破性疼痛方面的治疗成功率更高(39/47,83.0%)(P 结论:R、C1、C2 和 C3 组在控制突破性疼痛方面的治疗成功率更高:出现突破性疼痛的产妇可以接受1.5%的硬膜外氯普鲁卡因,而不是较低浓度的氯普鲁卡因和罗哌卡因,以达到更快、更好的止痛效果和更高的患者满意度:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2300071069,http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx 。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Chloroprocaine for Breakthrough Pain During Labor Analgesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.","authors":"Tianzhen Ji, Can Jiang, Hongxia Liu, Zhehao Cai, Rongrong Liu, Lei Xie, Cheng Xu","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00577-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00577-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A significant number of women who undergo neuraxial labor analgesia experience breakthrough pain. Prompt mitigation of breakthrough pain is essential to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. We evaluated epidural chloroprocaine compared with ropivacaine in alleviating labor breakthrough pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial between May and July 2023. Eligible parturients received epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil. Those with breakthrough pain were randomized to receive either 0.125% epidural ropivacaine (group R) or chloroprocaine at concentrations of 0.5% (group C1), 1.0% (group C2), or 1.5% (group C3), all in a volume of 6 mL. The primary outcome was the treatment success rate, indicated by a decrease of at least 4 points on the numerical rating scale pain score 9 min after analgesic injection. Secondary outcomes and adverse effects were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 323 patients receiving epidural analgesia, 192 experienced breakthrough pain. After exclusion of three patients because of protocol deviation, there were 47, 48, 47, and 47 patients in group R, C1, C2, and C3, respectively. Group C3 demonstrated a higher treatment success rate (39/47, 83.0%) in managing breakthrough pain than group R (26/47, 55.3%), group C1 (12/48, 25.0%), and group C2 (30/47, 63.8%) (p < 0.001). Group C3 had lower numerical rating scale scores at 6 and 9 min after injection and required fewer patient-controlled epidural boluses than other groups. In addition, group C3 reported greater satisfaction than the other groups (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in obstetric or neonatal outcomes across these groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parturients experiencing breakthrough pain could receive 1.5% epidural chloroprocaine, rather than lower chloroprocaine concentrations and ropivacaine, to achieve more rapid and better pain relief with higher patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300071069, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"227-239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928033/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139651383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries. 海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家偏头痛患者未得到满足的需求。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8
Abdulrazaq Albilali, Jasem Al-Hashel, Ziad Elchami, Suhail Al Rukn, Abu Baker Al Madani, Muna AlTunaiji, Jalal Al Ali, Mohamed Fathy, Jean Joury

The scale of migraine and its impact on the lives of patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries may be underestimated by healthcare professionals and the public and unmet needs in the provision of migraine medical care may exist. This article reports the key outcomes from a meeting of migraine specialists and their patients organised by the Emirates Neurology Society to learn more about the patient diagnosis and treatment journey and the extent to which migraine affects daily life. Patient stories indicate that the burden of migraine is underestimated, migraine is not generally recognised as a disease, delayed and incorrect diagnoses are common, and that achieving symptom control is often more a question of good luck rather than good management. Disease awareness campaigns are recommended to elevate societal understanding of migraine and reduce stigma toward patients affected by migraine. Recommendations for an improved healthcare system experience for patients affected by migraine include education initiatives targeting patients and physicians as well as initiatives to address gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of migraine.

海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家的医护人员和公众可能低估了偏头痛的严重程度及其对患者生活的影响,在提供偏头痛医疗护理方面可能存在尚未满足的需求。本文报告了阿联酋神经病学协会组织的偏头痛专家及其患者会议的主要成果,该会议旨在进一步了解患者的诊断和治疗过程以及偏头痛对日常生活的影响程度。患者的故事表明,偏头痛造成的负担被低估了,偏头痛没有被普遍认为是一种疾病,诊断延迟和诊断错误的情况很普遍,而症状控制的好坏往往取决于运气,而不是良好的管理。建议开展疾病宣传活动,提高社会对偏头痛的认识,减少对偏头痛患者的歧视。为改善偏头痛患者的医疗保健系统体验而提出的建议包括针对患者和医生的教育活动,以及弥补偏头痛诊断和治疗差距的活动。
{"title":"Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.","authors":"Abdulrazaq Albilali, Jasem Al-Hashel, Ziad Elchami, Suhail Al Rukn, Abu Baker Al Madani, Muna AlTunaiji, Jalal Al Ali, Mohamed Fathy, Jean Joury","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scale of migraine and its impact on the lives of patients in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries may be underestimated by healthcare professionals and the public and unmet needs in the provision of migraine medical care may exist. This article reports the key outcomes from a meeting of migraine specialists and their patients organised by the Emirates Neurology Society to learn more about the patient diagnosis and treatment journey and the extent to which migraine affects daily life. Patient stories indicate that the burden of migraine is underestimated, migraine is not generally recognised as a disease, delayed and incorrect diagnoses are common, and that achieving symptom control is often more a question of good luck rather than good management. Disease awareness campaigns are recommended to elevate societal understanding of migraine and reduce stigma toward patients affected by migraine. Recommendations for an improved healthcare system experience for patients affected by migraine include education initiatives targeting patients and physicians as well as initiatives to address gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"201-210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928050/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Additional Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy with Lidocaine Injection on Clinical and MRI Findings in Frozen Shoulder: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. 体外冲击波疗法联合利多卡因注射对肩周炎临床和核磁共振成像结果的额外影响:前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9
Gopal Nambi, Mshari Alghadier, Mudathir Mohamedahmed Eltayeb, Osama R Aldhafian, Ayman K Saleh, Nesreen Alsanousi, Mohamed Nagah Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdehamid A Attallah, Mohammed Abdelgwad Ismail, Mohamed Elfeshawy, Yaser El Sayed Hasan Wahd, Alaa Jameel A Albarakati

Introduction: Frozen shoulder is a very common musculoskeletal condition and the evidence related to the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in individuals with frozen shoulder is rare. Therefore, this study aims to compare and investigate the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in a frozen shoulder.

Methods: Sixty eligible participants with frozen shoulder were included and the active group (n = 30, age 52.12 ± 5.2 years) received a lidocaine injection (1% lidocaine (Xylocaine) and 2cc (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate) with active ESWT (3.5 bar air pressure and 2000 pulses with an energy flux density (EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm2) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. The placebo group (n = 30, age 53.56 ± 5.5 years) received lidocaine injection with placebo treatment (a special head that blocked the shock waves) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. Both groups received progressive resistance exercises (PRE) to the shoulder muscles. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analogue scale. The other outcome measures were the thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abduction, and lateral rotation range of motion (ROM), functional disability, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 6-month follow-up.

Results: The post-intervention at 4 weeks showed an improvement of 2.0 (CI 95% 1.71-2.28) in the active group compared to the placebo group. Similar effects were noted after 8 weeks (2.2) (CI 95% 1.91-2.48) and at the 6-month (1.9) (CI 95% 1.61-2.18) follow-up. Similar improvements were also found in the thickness of the CHL ligament (0.6) (CI 95% 0.46-0.73), abduction and lateral rotation (ROM) (- 23.6) (CI 95% - 27.47 to -19.72), (- 18.10) (CI 95% - 19.72 to - 16.47), functional disability (16.2) (CI 95% 14.85-17.54), kinesiophobia (11.0 (CI 95% 10.21-11.98), depression status (4.4) (CI 95% 4.03-4.76) and quality of life (0.9) (CI 95% 0.79-1.00) (p = 0.001) at the 6-month follow-up period, where mean estimates and their confidence intervals all included worthwhile effects. There were no adverse reactions or side effects noted in either the active or placebo groups during and after the treatment.

Conclusions: The study concluded that the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy after intra-articular lidocaine injection improves pain, functional disability, range of motion, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life in people with frozen shoulder.

Trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in , identifier; CTRI/2020/04/024834 prospectively registered on 24/04/2020.

简介:肩周炎是一种非常常见的肌肉骨骼疾病:肩周炎是一种非常常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,但有关体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与关节内利多卡因注射对肩周炎患者的额外效果的证据却很少见。因此,本研究旨在比较和调查体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与关节内注射利多卡因对肩周炎患者的额外效果:60名符合条件的肩周炎患者被纳入其中,积极治疗组(n = 30,年龄为52.12 ± 5.2岁)接受利多卡因注射(1%利多卡因(Xylocaine)和2cc(80 mg)醋酸甲泼尼龙),并接受积极ESWT治疗(3.5巴气压和2000次脉冲,能量通量密度(EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm2),每周三次,持续4周。安慰剂组(n = 30,年龄为 53.56 ± 5.5 岁)接受利多卡因注射和安慰剂治疗(阻断冲击波的特殊头),每周三次,持续 4 周。两组患者均接受肩部肌肉渐进阻力训练(PRE)。主要结果是疼痛强度,用视觉模拟量表测量。其他结果指标包括通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量的肱冠韧带(CHL)厚度、外展和侧转活动范围(ROM)、功能障碍、运动恐惧症、抑郁状况和生活质量。在基线、4 周后、8 周后和 6 个月的随访中对参与者进行了评估:干预后 4 周的结果显示,与安慰剂组相比,积极干预组的疗效提高了 2.0(CI 95% 1.71-2.28)。8 周后(2.2)(CI 95% 1.91-2.48)和 6 个月随访时(1.9)(CI 95% 1.61-2.18)也有类似效果。在 CHL 韧带厚度(0.6)(CI 95% 0.46-0.73)、外展和侧旋(ROM)(- 23.6)(CI 95% - 27.47 至 -19.72)、(- 18.10)(CI 95% - 19.72 至 -16.47)、功能性残疾(16.2)(CI 95% 14.85-17.54)、运动障碍恐惧症(1.9)(CI 95% 1.61-2.18)方面也发现了类似的改善。54)、运动恐惧(11.0(CI 95% 10.21-11.98)、抑郁状态(4.4)(CI 95% 4.03-4.76)和生活质量(0.9)(CI 95% 0.79-1.00)(P = 0.001),随访 6 个月,平均估计值及其置信区间均包括值得效应。在治疗期间和治疗后,活性组和安慰剂组均未发现不良反应或副作用:该研究认为,在关节内注射利多卡因后加用体外冲击波疗法可改善肩周炎患者的疼痛、功能障碍、活动范围、运动恐惧症、抑郁状态和生活质量。试验注册:https://ctri.nic.in ,标识符;CTRI/2020/04/024834,2020年4月24日进行了前瞻性注册。
{"title":"Additional Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy with Lidocaine Injection on Clinical and MRI Findings in Frozen Shoulder: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Gopal Nambi, Mshari Alghadier, Mudathir Mohamedahmed Eltayeb, Osama R Aldhafian, Ayman K Saleh, Nesreen Alsanousi, Mohamed Nagah Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdehamid A Attallah, Mohammed Abdelgwad Ismail, Mohamed Elfeshawy, Yaser El Sayed Hasan Wahd, Alaa Jameel A Albarakati","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frozen shoulder is a very common musculoskeletal condition and the evidence related to the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in individuals with frozen shoulder is rare. Therefore, this study aims to compare and investigate the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in a frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty eligible participants with frozen shoulder were included and the active group (n = 30, age 52.12 ± 5.2 years) received a lidocaine injection (1% lidocaine (Xylocaine) and 2cc (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate) with active ESWT (3.5 bar air pressure and 2000 pulses with an energy flux density (EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup>) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. The placebo group (n = 30, age 53.56 ± 5.5 years) received lidocaine injection with placebo treatment (a special head that blocked the shock waves) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. Both groups received progressive resistance exercises (PRE) to the shoulder muscles. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analogue scale. The other outcome measures were the thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abduction, and lateral rotation range of motion (ROM), functional disability, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention at 4 weeks showed an improvement of 2.0 (CI 95% 1.71-2.28) in the active group compared to the placebo group. Similar effects were noted after 8 weeks (2.2) (CI 95% 1.91-2.48) and at the 6-month (1.9) (CI 95% 1.61-2.18) follow-up. Similar improvements were also found in the thickness of the CHL ligament (0.6) (CI 95% 0.46-0.73), abduction and lateral rotation (ROM) (- 23.6) (CI 95% - 27.47 to -19.72), (- 18.10) (CI 95% - 19.72 to - 16.47), functional disability (16.2) (CI 95% 14.85-17.54), kinesiophobia (11.0 (CI 95% 10.21-11.98), depression status (4.4) (CI 95% 4.03-4.76) and quality of life (0.9) (CI 95% 0.79-1.00) (p = 0.001) at the 6-month follow-up period, where mean estimates and their confidence intervals all included worthwhile effects. There were no adverse reactions or side effects noted in either the active or placebo groups during and after the treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concluded that the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy after intra-articular lidocaine injection improves pain, functional disability, range of motion, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life in people with frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>https://ctri.nic.in , identifier; CTRI/2020/04/024834 prospectively registered on 24/04/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"251-268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928055/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139692635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor Regarding "The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Multipoint Fascial Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Combined Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study". 致编辑的信,内容涉及 "超声引导下的多点筋膜平面阻滞在接受联合胸腔镜-腹腔镜食管切除术的老年患者中的作用:前瞻性随机研究"。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-22 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00582-w
Xin-Tao Li, Fu-Shan Xue, Yi Cheng
{"title":"Letter to the Editor Regarding \"The Role of Ultrasound-Guided Multipoint Fascial Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Combined Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study\".","authors":"Xin-Tao Li, Fu-Shan Xue, Yi Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00582-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-024-00582-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"289-291"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928038/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139932366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain and Therapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1