Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-11DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003754
Feinuo Sun, Yulin Yang, Richard L Nahin
Abstract: There are no nationally representative studies examining both the frequency and correlates of "undiagnosed pain"-pain without a formal diagnosis. To identify the magnitude of this healthcare gap, we performed cross-sectional secondary analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2016-2019 data. The primary study outcome is "being undiagnosed": the absence of diagnoses for pain-related conditions among participants reporting pain-related interference (PRI). Pain-related interference was established using the SF36 pain question embedded in MEPS, with 10,954 individuals reporting any PRI within 4 weeks of the interview and 4,902 individuals reporting at least moderate PRI. Participants with PRI were assigned as "being undiagnosed" if the following conditions were met: (1) the participant did not have medical records for any pain-related conditions in both the previous and current year of the interview and (2) did not report having any pain-related priority conditions from a list provided during the MEPS interviews. Among those reporting any PRI, about 21.1 million people (9.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6%-10.0%) were without diagnoses for either primary pain conditions identified using MEPS clinical classification codes or conditions where pain would be a secondary symptom (eg, hypertension and immunity disorders). From multivariable logistic regression modeling, we determined that younger and middle-aged adults, males, racial and ethnic minority groups, foreign-born populations, people without insurance, and people with better perceived health are more likely to have their pain undiagnosed. Our findings underscore the need for improved access to care and better patient-provider communications in those suffering from underdiagnosed pain.
{"title":"Prevalence and correlates of \"undiagnosed pain\": evidence from the US national Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.","authors":"Feinuo Sun, Yulin Yang, Richard L Nahin","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003754","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>There are no nationally representative studies examining both the frequency and correlates of \"undiagnosed pain\"-pain without a formal diagnosis. To identify the magnitude of this healthcare gap, we performed cross-sectional secondary analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2016-2019 data. The primary study outcome is \"being undiagnosed\": the absence of diagnoses for pain-related conditions among participants reporting pain-related interference (PRI). Pain-related interference was established using the SF36 pain question embedded in MEPS, with 10,954 individuals reporting any PRI within 4 weeks of the interview and 4,902 individuals reporting at least moderate PRI. Participants with PRI were assigned as \"being undiagnosed\" if the following conditions were met: (1) the participant did not have medical records for any pain-related conditions in both the previous and current year of the interview and (2) did not report having any pain-related priority conditions from a list provided during the MEPS interviews. Among those reporting any PRI, about 21.1 million people (9.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.6%-10.0%) were without diagnoses for either primary pain conditions identified using MEPS clinical classification codes or conditions where pain would be a secondary symptom (eg, hypertension and immunity disorders). From multivariable logistic regression modeling, we determined that younger and middle-aged adults, males, racial and ethnic minority groups, foreign-born populations, people without insurance, and people with better perceived health are more likely to have their pain undiagnosed. Our findings underscore the need for improved access to care and better patient-provider communications in those suffering from underdiagnosed pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"150-158"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12709633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144883429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-08-27DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806
Wenyu Song, Kenneth J Mukamal, Joji Suzuki, Jorge A Rodriguez, Michael Sainlaire, Scott G Weiner, Patricia C Dykes, David W Bates
Abstract: Widespread misuse of prescription opioids has resulted in large numbers of opioid-related overdose deaths. It is critical to have a better understanding of the temporal patterns of opioid prescribing practices and associated clinical scenarios. We examined opioid prescription trends over 7 years in a large medical system using electronic health record data. Between 2017 and 2023, we identified 1,019,706 patients from 13 hospitals within a large health system in the northeastern United States, who had at least 1 opioid prescription. In total, there were 3,877,281 associated encounters with 18,225 prescribers. We examined the overall monthly opioid prescription rates and observed an average decrease during the 84 months of study period and discovered 4 distinct stages. A decrease was seen between January 2017 and January 2020 (monthly rate change: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.89% to -0.41%), followed by a sharp decrease and a fast rebound between February 2020, April 2020, and July 2020 (monthly rate change: -10.60%, 95% CI: -14.73% to -2.52%; 13.06%, 95% CI: 3.42%-18.47%), then back to a gradual decrease from August 2020 to December 2023 (monthly rate change: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.67% to -0.29%). When prescriptions were further classified by prescribing setting, patient demographics, and patient visit encounter types, we observed variations among these subgroups. We also identified significant associations between patient characteristics and provider specialty with high morphine milligram equivalent dose prescriptions. These results highlight the complexity of opioid prescription practice trends indicating that all these issues need to be considered in developing prescription guidance.
{"title":"Trends and factors associated with opioid prescribing from 2017 to 2023.","authors":"Wenyu Song, Kenneth J Mukamal, Joji Suzuki, Jorge A Rodriguez, Michael Sainlaire, Scott G Weiner, Patricia C Dykes, David W Bates","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003806","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Widespread misuse of prescription opioids has resulted in large numbers of opioid-related overdose deaths. It is critical to have a better understanding of the temporal patterns of opioid prescribing practices and associated clinical scenarios. We examined opioid prescription trends over 7 years in a large medical system using electronic health record data. Between 2017 and 2023, we identified 1,019,706 patients from 13 hospitals within a large health system in the northeastern United States, who had at least 1 opioid prescription. In total, there were 3,877,281 associated encounters with 18,225 prescribers. We examined the overall monthly opioid prescription rates and observed an average decrease during the 84 months of study period and discovered 4 distinct stages. A decrease was seen between January 2017 and January 2020 (monthly rate change: -0.70%, 95% CI: -0.89% to -0.41%), followed by a sharp decrease and a fast rebound between February 2020, April 2020, and July 2020 (monthly rate change: -10.60%, 95% CI: -14.73% to -2.52%; 13.06%, 95% CI: 3.42%-18.47%), then back to a gradual decrease from August 2020 to December 2023 (monthly rate change: -0.46%, 95% CI: -0.67% to -0.29%). When prescriptions were further classified by prescribing setting, patient demographics, and patient visit encounter types, we observed variations among these subgroups. We also identified significant associations between patient characteristics and provider specialty with high morphine milligram equivalent dose prescriptions. These results highlight the complexity of opioid prescription practice trends indicating that all these issues need to be considered in developing prescription guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"218-225"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144964581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003863
Jemma Todd, Louise Sharpe, Julie Ji, Brydee Pickup, Tessa Rooney, Emily A Holmes
{"title":"Reimagining pain: the role of mental imagery in pain experience.","authors":"Jemma Todd, Louise Sharpe, Julie Ji, Brydee Pickup, Tessa Rooney, Emily A Holmes","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003863","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003863","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145864085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender minority (GM) persons have been reported to experience chronic pain at higher rates than the general population, yet comprehensive pain phenotyping in this group remains underexplored. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to characterize chronic pain and pain-related factors in GM persons and examine associations of these characteristics with gender identity and gender-affirming hormone therapy (GHT). One hundred three GM adults completed validated questionnaires assessing pain characteristics and severity, sleep, fatigue, stress, trauma, and the chronic overlapping pain condition (COPC) screener. Participants included those who identify as transgender men (TGM), transgender women (TGW), and gender-expansive persons (all assigned female sex at birth). Overall, 50.5% of the entire cohort reported the presence of chronic pain. Transgender men and gender-expansive persons reported greater pain severity, pain interference, fibromyalgianess, stress, and sleep disturbances compared with TGW. Widespread pain was common (36%-45.8% across groups), and 15.5% of the entire cohort met criteria for fibromyalgia. Transgender men and gender-expansive individuals also had increased numbers of COPCs than TGW. Stress, but not GHT type or gender identity, was significantly associated with chronic pain in multivariable models. Chronic pain and nociplastic symptoms are highly prevalent among GM persons, particularly among TGM and gender-expansive persons, and stress appears to be a key contributor to the pain phenotype. These findings underscore the need for longitudinal research into the biopsychosocial drivers of chronic pain in the GM population and the effects of GHT on pain in GM persons.
{"title":"Phenotypic characteristics of chronic pain and pain-related factors in gender minority persons: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Grace Merchant,Anamika Ratri,Sharon Fitzgerald Wolff,Nancy Stewart,Courtney Marsh,Quinn Jackson,Annesa Flentje,Miranda McMillan,Emily Schulze,Taylor Cusick,Meredith Gray,Andrea L Chadwick","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003900","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003900","url":null,"abstract":"Gender minority (GM) persons have been reported to experience chronic pain at higher rates than the general population, yet comprehensive pain phenotyping in this group remains underexplored. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to characterize chronic pain and pain-related factors in GM persons and examine associations of these characteristics with gender identity and gender-affirming hormone therapy (GHT). One hundred three GM adults completed validated questionnaires assessing pain characteristics and severity, sleep, fatigue, stress, trauma, and the chronic overlapping pain condition (COPC) screener. Participants included those who identify as transgender men (TGM), transgender women (TGW), and gender-expansive persons (all assigned female sex at birth). Overall, 50.5% of the entire cohort reported the presence of chronic pain. Transgender men and gender-expansive persons reported greater pain severity, pain interference, fibromyalgianess, stress, and sleep disturbances compared with TGW. Widespread pain was common (36%-45.8% across groups), and 15.5% of the entire cohort met criteria for fibromyalgia. Transgender men and gender-expansive individuals also had increased numbers of COPCs than TGW. Stress, but not GHT type or gender identity, was significantly associated with chronic pain in multivariable models. Chronic pain and nociplastic symptoms are highly prevalent among GM persons, particularly among TGM and gender-expansive persons, and stress appears to be a key contributor to the pain phenotype. These findings underscore the need for longitudinal research into the biopsychosocial drivers of chronic pain in the GM population and the effects of GHT on pain in GM persons.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003899
Shan Wang, Christopher Eccleston, Kate Wilmut, Francis Keefe, Edmund Keogh
Abstract: Self-initiated actions often generate sensory signals perceived to be less intense than identical signals generated externally. This phenomenon, known as sensory attenuation, is particularly robust for nonpainful tactile sensations. For pain, however, even if the stimulation is self-generated and predictable, it remains painful, albeit sometimes slightly less intense. This difference may reflect the functional divergence between pain and nonpainful sensations, with the sense of agency playing a central role in this distinction. Across 2 experiments involving 61 pain-free adults, we investigated the attenuation of self-induced pain and nonpainful sensations across different stimulation modalities, contexts, and agency levels. We found that self-induced attenuation depended on stimulation modality rather than intensity, with significant reductions for modalities involving strong motoric components and high spatiotemporal alignment (eg, mechanical pressure), in line with the internal forward model. Individuals' trait agency played a pivotal role, with stronger agency associated with enhanced attenuation of nonpainful sensations and mild pain, but reduced attenuation of intense pain. Sex differences also emerged with stronger attenuation effects in men, who also reported higher levels of agency. This study is the first to show that trait-level agency differentially modulates attenuation for painful and nonpainful sensations and the first to explore sex differences. By comparing pain with nonpainful touch, we proposed that self-induced sensations are not attenuated uniformly but shaped by evolutionary priorities such that socially or playfully mediated sensations are more readily suppressed, while high-threat sensations like pain resist qualitative suppression to preserve their protective function.
{"title":"Why can we hurt ourselves? Human agency and embodied action in the attenuation of self-induced pain.","authors":"Shan Wang, Christopher Eccleston, Kate Wilmut, Francis Keefe, Edmund Keogh","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Self-initiated actions often generate sensory signals perceived to be less intense than identical signals generated externally. This phenomenon, known as sensory attenuation, is particularly robust for nonpainful tactile sensations. For pain, however, even if the stimulation is self-generated and predictable, it remains painful, albeit sometimes slightly less intense. This difference may reflect the functional divergence between pain and nonpainful sensations, with the sense of agency playing a central role in this distinction. Across 2 experiments involving 61 pain-free adults, we investigated the attenuation of self-induced pain and nonpainful sensations across different stimulation modalities, contexts, and agency levels. We found that self-induced attenuation depended on stimulation modality rather than intensity, with significant reductions for modalities involving strong motoric components and high spatiotemporal alignment (eg, mechanical pressure), in line with the internal forward model. Individuals' trait agency played a pivotal role, with stronger agency associated with enhanced attenuation of nonpainful sensations and mild pain, but reduced attenuation of intense pain. Sex differences also emerged with stronger attenuation effects in men, who also reported higher levels of agency. This study is the first to show that trait-level agency differentially modulates attenuation for painful and nonpainful sensations and the first to explore sex differences. By comparing pain with nonpainful touch, we proposed that self-induced sensations are not attenuated uniformly but shaped by evolutionary priorities such that socially or playfully mediated sensations are more readily suppressed, while high-threat sensations like pain resist qualitative suppression to preserve their protective function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145864214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003895
Christopher J Miller,Andrew Conroy,Warren B Bilker,Alisa J Stephens-Shields,John T Farrar
The validity of enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) trials to evaluate the efficacy of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain has been questioned. Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials include an open-label titration phase to identify treatment responders who tolerate the drug, followed by a double-blind randomized phase in which responders either continue the drug or switch to placebo. A key concern is that the apparent efficacy of opioids in EERW trials may be attributable to induction of withdrawal symptoms among participants switched to placebo. We used individual participant data from 13 EERW trials (N = 5070) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to estimate the extent to which withdrawal symptoms mediated the treatment effect of opioids on pain. The primary mediator was the maximum Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale score during the randomized phase. The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity (numeric rating scale) from randomization baseline to week 12. The pooled average treatment effect was -0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.87 to -0.55) on the numeric rating scale. Withdrawal symptoms did not significantly mediate the effect of opioids on pain overall, accounting for 2% of the pooled treatment effect (95% CI, -1% to 4%). However, significant mediation was observed in 3 individual trials (range, 8% to 28% of treatment effect mediated). Although withdrawal symptoms did not systematically bias efficacy findings in EERW trials of opioids submitted to the FDA, they contributed to overestimation in some cases. These findings support incorporating mediation analyses in future EERW trials to ensure accurate interpretation of study results.
{"title":"The impact of opioid withdrawal symptoms on pain outcomes in enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials: a mediation meta-analysis of trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration.","authors":"Christopher J Miller,Andrew Conroy,Warren B Bilker,Alisa J Stephens-Shields,John T Farrar","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003895","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003895","url":null,"abstract":"The validity of enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal (EERW) trials to evaluate the efficacy of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain has been questioned. Enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials include an open-label titration phase to identify treatment responders who tolerate the drug, followed by a double-blind randomized phase in which responders either continue the drug or switch to placebo. A key concern is that the apparent efficacy of opioids in EERW trials may be attributable to induction of withdrawal symptoms among participants switched to placebo. We used individual participant data from 13 EERW trials (N = 5070) submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to estimate the extent to which withdrawal symptoms mediated the treatment effect of opioids on pain. The primary mediator was the maximum Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale score during the randomized phase. The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity (numeric rating scale) from randomization baseline to week 12. The pooled average treatment effect was -0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.87 to -0.55) on the numeric rating scale. Withdrawal symptoms did not significantly mediate the effect of opioids on pain overall, accounting for 2% of the pooled treatment effect (95% CI, -1% to 4%). However, significant mediation was observed in 3 individual trials (range, 8% to 28% of treatment effect mediated). Although withdrawal symptoms did not systematically bias efficacy findings in EERW trials of opioids submitted to the FDA, they contributed to overestimation in some cases. These findings support incorporating mediation analyses in future EERW trials to ensure accurate interpretation of study results.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common and disabling of all pain conditions. Combination treatment that includes duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has not been rigorously evaluated. We investigated the effectiveness of the combination treatment against duloxetine monotherapy and also examined the effects of adding motivational interviewing (MI) to enhance participant's motivation to engage in web-based CBT. Participants with CMP (n = 281) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: (1) duloxetine monotherapy, (2) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based CBT) without phone-based MI, and (3) combination treatment with 6 sessions of phone-based MI. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory total pain score (BPI TPS) at week 24. Overall, mean (SD) baseline BPI TPS in arms 1, 2 and 3 were 5.8 (1.8), 5.7 (2.1), and 6.1 (1.6), respectively. Compared with baseline, participants in all 3 arms had significant improvement in their BPI TPS during the 24-week trial. However, BPI TPS were not significantly different among the 3 arms, neither were the BPI pain interference and severity, and global ratings of change. The proportion of participants who completed ≥ 6 web-based modules were about the same in arms 2 and 3: 46.3% vs 45.8%, respectively. Web-based CBT did not demonstrate additional benefits beyond those observed with duloxetine monotherapy, which may, in part, be due to low participant completion of the web-based modules. Unexpectedly, the addition of phone-based MI did not significantly improve module completion rates. These findings support the utility of duloxetine over the 24-week study period.
{"title":"Duloxetine and cognitive behavioral therapy with phone-based support for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Dennis Ang,Sebastian Kaplan,Francis Keefe,William Rice,Andrea Anderson,Christine Rini,Christopher Miles,Kathryn Hartlieb,Meghan Willoughby,Nikita Revankar,Haiying Chen","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003861","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003861","url":null,"abstract":"Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is the most common and disabling of all pain conditions. Combination treatment that includes duloxetine and web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has not been rigorously evaluated. We investigated the effectiveness of the combination treatment against duloxetine monotherapy and also examined the effects of adding motivational interviewing (MI) to enhance participant's motivation to engage in web-based CBT. Participants with CMP (n = 281) were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: (1) duloxetine monotherapy, (2) combination treatment (duloxetine + web-based CBT) without phone-based MI, and (3) combination treatment with 6 sessions of phone-based MI. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory total pain score (BPI TPS) at week 24. Overall, mean (SD) baseline BPI TPS in arms 1, 2 and 3 were 5.8 (1.8), 5.7 (2.1), and 6.1 (1.6), respectively. Compared with baseline, participants in all 3 arms had significant improvement in their BPI TPS during the 24-week trial. However, BPI TPS were not significantly different among the 3 arms, neither were the BPI pain interference and severity, and global ratings of change. The proportion of participants who completed ≥ 6 web-based modules were about the same in arms 2 and 3: 46.3% vs 45.8%, respectively. Web-based CBT did not demonstrate additional benefits beyond those observed with duloxetine monotherapy, which may, in part, be due to low participant completion of the web-based modules. Unexpectedly, the addition of phone-based MI did not significantly improve module completion rates. These findings support the utility of duloxetine over the 24-week study period.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"257 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145830346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Spontaneous activity of peripheral sensory nerve fibers is one of the main drivers of neuropathic pain. It can be assessed in microneurography recordings of patients' C fibers and in patch-clamp recordings of dissociated dorsal root ganglia from humans and rodents. In microneurography of human C fibers, a distinct subgroup of neurons, the so-called mechano-insensitive (CMi) or sleeping nociceptors, shows spontaneous activity during neuropathic pain. It was shown before that sensory neurons from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iSNs) can be used to model this increased spontaneous activity in vitro, suggesting that a disease relevant cell type is generated with this approach. The origin of the spontaneous activity in human C fibers is not fully understood. Derived sensory neurons offer the unique possibility to study patient-derived, single-cell function, allowing for identification of potential mechanisms underlying spontaneous C-fiber activity. Here, we identify 4 distinct functional subtypes of iSNs from healthy donors and a patient suffering from the neuropathic pain syndrome inherited erythromelalgia using patch-clamp recordings. Similar to microneurography recordings from the same patient, spontaneous activity is restricted to 1 functional subgroup that shows tonic firing behavior and seems to be especially prone to develop neuronal hyperexcitability. We demonstrate that spontaneous activity correlates with a reduced voltage threshold of action potential generation and increased spontaneous depolarizing fluctuations of the membrane potential. Our findings reveal that only the tonically firing functional subclass of iSNs shows spontaneous activity and suggest that these neurons may be related to the pathologically active CMi fibers identified during microneurography recordings in patients with pain.
{"title":"Spontaneous activity in pain patient stem cell-derived sensory neurons arises from one functional subclass.","authors":"Esther Eberhardt,Barbara Namer,Anika Neureiter,Jannis Körner,Ellen Jørum,Ingo Kurth,Beate Winner,Angelika Lampert","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003865","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003865","url":null,"abstract":"Spontaneous activity of peripheral sensory nerve fibers is one of the main drivers of neuropathic pain. It can be assessed in microneurography recordings of patients' C fibers and in patch-clamp recordings of dissociated dorsal root ganglia from humans and rodents. In microneurography of human C fibers, a distinct subgroup of neurons, the so-called mechano-insensitive (CMi) or sleeping nociceptors, shows spontaneous activity during neuropathic pain. It was shown before that sensory neurons from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iSNs) can be used to model this increased spontaneous activity in vitro, suggesting that a disease relevant cell type is generated with this approach. The origin of the spontaneous activity in human C fibers is not fully understood. Derived sensory neurons offer the unique possibility to study patient-derived, single-cell function, allowing for identification of potential mechanisms underlying spontaneous C-fiber activity. Here, we identify 4 distinct functional subtypes of iSNs from healthy donors and a patient suffering from the neuropathic pain syndrome inherited erythromelalgia using patch-clamp recordings. Similar to microneurography recordings from the same patient, spontaneous activity is restricted to 1 functional subgroup that shows tonic firing behavior and seems to be especially prone to develop neuronal hyperexcitability. We demonstrate that spontaneous activity correlates with a reduced voltage threshold of action potential generation and increased spontaneous depolarizing fluctuations of the membrane potential. Our findings reveal that only the tonically firing functional subclass of iSNs shows spontaneous activity and suggest that these neurons may be related to the pathologically active CMi fibers identified during microneurography recordings in patients with pain.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145807879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003883
Luiz F Ferrari, Ashley Wilkinson, Anna Ramirez, James Kuchenbecker, Jay Neitz, Matthew Mauck, Norman E Taylor
Abstract: Animal models of disease are frequently used to test the safety and efficacy of new treatments and to explore mechanistic insights. The most useful models are those that accurately predict therapeutic success in humans of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Here, we tested the predictive validity of the Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) rat strain as a model of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), a chronic disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and mood disorders. Using the Fibromyalgia Analog Model (FAM) index, a multivariate statistical tool that quantifies the magnitude of fibromyalgia traits in an animal, we assessed the effectiveness of both established and investigational pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies in SS rats. FAM scores were higher in female SS rats than males (P < 0.0001), indicating more robust fibromyalgia-like traits, matching the higher prevalence of FMS in women. When compared to controls, treatments with the FDA-approved drugs for FMS milnacipran and pregabalin (both P < 0.0001, in males and females), as well as the investigational therapies metformin (P < 0.0001) and green light exposure (P = 0.0034 and P = 0.0002 for males and females, respectively) effectively decreased the FAM scores, showing reduction of FMS-like symptoms in SS rats. In contrast, indomethacin and the mu-opioid agonist DAMGO displayed limited efficacy (P = 0.0239 and P = 0.0523, respectively), matching the relative effectiveness of these treatments in humans, justifying why they are not usually prescribed for patients with FMS. The results validate the SS rat as a predictive model in testing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for FMS treatment, illustrating the utility of the FAM index in assessing treatment outcomes.
{"title":"Fibromyalgia Analog Model index analysis demonstrates the predictive validity of the Dahl S rat as a model of fibromyalgia.","authors":"Luiz F Ferrari, Ashley Wilkinson, Anna Ramirez, James Kuchenbecker, Jay Neitz, Matthew Mauck, Norman E Taylor","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Animal models of disease are frequently used to test the safety and efficacy of new treatments and to explore mechanistic insights. The most useful models are those that accurately predict therapeutic success in humans of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Here, we tested the predictive validity of the Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) rat strain as a model of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), a chronic disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, and mood disorders. Using the Fibromyalgia Analog Model (FAM) index, a multivariate statistical tool that quantifies the magnitude of fibromyalgia traits in an animal, we assessed the effectiveness of both established and investigational pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies in SS rats. FAM scores were higher in female SS rats than males (P < 0.0001), indicating more robust fibromyalgia-like traits, matching the higher prevalence of FMS in women. When compared to controls, treatments with the FDA-approved drugs for FMS milnacipran and pregabalin (both P < 0.0001, in males and females), as well as the investigational therapies metformin (P < 0.0001) and green light exposure (P = 0.0034 and P = 0.0002 for males and females, respectively) effectively decreased the FAM scores, showing reduction of FMS-like symptoms in SS rats. In contrast, indomethacin and the mu-opioid agonist DAMGO displayed limited efficacy (P = 0.0239 and P = 0.0523, respectively), matching the relative effectiveness of these treatments in humans, justifying why they are not usually prescribed for patients with FMS. The results validate the SS rat as a predictive model in testing pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for FMS treatment, illustrating the utility of the FAM index in assessing treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147284143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Skin-to-skin care (SSC) and skin-to-skin contact for procedural pain (SSCP) are recognized for their physiological and emotional benefits in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including pain reduction in preterm infants. However, little is known about how birthing parents of very and extremely preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age), a significantly more challenging preterm infant population to enact SSCP, perceive this intervention. This study aimed to explore birthing parents' experiences and perceptions related to the use of SSC and SSCP in the NICU with their very and extremely preterm infants. In partnership with a national preterm parent organization, virtual interviews were conducted with 38 mothers of very or extremely preterm infants from across Canada, who had been admitted to the NICU within the past 5 years. Data were synthesized into 8 primary themes relating first to SSC broadly and then SSCP. In addition, mothers' opinions about a priori concepts and potential interventions (generated from pilot data) were also vetted. Important actionable facilitators and barriers related to fears and interventions to support SSCP with parents of very and extremely preterm infants were discerned. Although most found their experience rewarding, barriers such as limited instruction, inconsistent staff support, procedural challenges, and emotional strain often hindered the use of SSCP. Enhancing staff training, standardizing protocols, offering mental health support, and adopting flexible, family-centered policies appear key to improving SSCP engagement with the youngest preterm infants.
{"title":"Understanding maternal perspectives of skin-to-skin contact for the management of acute pain in very and extremely preterm infants.","authors":"Haleh Hashemi,Estreya Cohen,Nichaela Garvey,Andrea Lebovic,Fabiana Bacchini,Lesley Johannsson,Carol Cheng,Vibhuti Shah,Rebecca Pillai Riddell","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003885","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003885","url":null,"abstract":"Skin-to-skin care (SSC) and skin-to-skin contact for procedural pain (SSCP) are recognized for their physiological and emotional benefits in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including pain reduction in preterm infants. However, little is known about how birthing parents of very and extremely preterm infants (<32 weeks gestational age), a significantly more challenging preterm infant population to enact SSCP, perceive this intervention. This study aimed to explore birthing parents' experiences and perceptions related to the use of SSC and SSCP in the NICU with their very and extremely preterm infants. In partnership with a national preterm parent organization, virtual interviews were conducted with 38 mothers of very or extremely preterm infants from across Canada, who had been admitted to the NICU within the past 5 years. Data were synthesized into 8 primary themes relating first to SSC broadly and then SSCP. In addition, mothers' opinions about a priori concepts and potential interventions (generated from pilot data) were also vetted. Important actionable facilitators and barriers related to fears and interventions to support SSCP with parents of very and extremely preterm infants were discerned. Although most found their experience rewarding, barriers such as limited instruction, inconsistent staff support, procedural challenges, and emotional strain often hindered the use of SSCP. Enhancing staff training, standardizing protocols, offering mental health support, and adopting flexible, family-centered policies appear key to improving SSCP engagement with the youngest preterm infants.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"248 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}