Pub Date : 2021-02-22DOI: 10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0013
J. Rennes, C. Achin, Armelle Andro, L. Bereni, Alexandre Jaunait, Luca Greco, R. Lagrave, Gianfranco Rebucini
{"title":"Introduction. La chair des rapports sociaux","authors":"J. Rennes, C. Achin, Armelle Andro, L. Bereni, Alexandre Jaunait, Luca Greco, R. Lagrave, Gianfranco Rebucini","doi":"10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":199485,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopédie critique du genre","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122890767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-22DOI: 10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0479
Brice Chamouleau, Patrick Farges
{"title":"Nation","authors":"Brice Chamouleau, Patrick Farges","doi":"10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0479","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":199485,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopédie critique du genre","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131883741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-02-22DOI: 10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0601
A. Harris, E. Rozmarin, Alexandre Jaunait, M. Prager, Idan Segev
: Both international and historical in scope, this paper focuses on the challenges faced by psychoanalysis today and sheds light on the internal ruptures it has faced over the last years. It offers a dialectical reading of these ruptures, understanding them as a confrontation between defenders of scientific vs. hermeneutical viewpoints; and it raises the question: are they incompatible? We urge both researchers and clinically-oriented analysts to go through the depressive position and adopt a strong pluralism, closely articulating clinical material and theorization. By critically analyzing the debates opposing D. Stern to A. Green, and I. Hoffman to M. N. Eagle and D. L. Wolitzky, then to J. Safran, we wish to stress the risks entailed by confining psychoanalysis into a rigidly hermeneutical stance, ignoring that a scientific stance can be open to complexity. This paper defends a strong pluralism. Its epistemological stance aims at offering a starting point to establish a living dialogue in our discipline, where the diversity of viewpoints needs to be taken seriously: overcoming excessive oppositions opens up new perspective both in research and clinical work.
从国际和历史的角度来看，本文关注的是今天精神分析所面临的挑战，并揭示了它在过去几年里所面临的内部破裂。它提供了对这些断裂的辩证解读，将它们理解为科学与解释学观点的捍卫者之间的对抗;这就提出了一个问题:它们是不相容的吗?我们敦促研究人员和临床导向的分析人员通过抑郁的立场，并采取强有力的多元化，密切阐明临床材料和理论。通过批判性地分析D. Stern对a . Green, I. Hoffman对M. N. Eagle和D. L. Wolitzky，然后是J. Safran的争论，我们希望强调将精神分析限制在严格的解释学立场中所带来的风险，而忽视了科学立场可以对复杂性开放。本文捍卫一种强有力的多元主义。它的认识论立场旨在提供一个起点，在我们的学科中建立一个生动的对话，在这个对话中，观点的多样性需要被认真对待:克服过度的对立，为研究和临床工作开辟了新的视角。
{"title":"Psychanalyse","authors":"A. Harris, E. Rozmarin, Alexandre Jaunait, M. Prager, Idan Segev","doi":"10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0601","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.renne.2021.01.0601","url":null,"abstract":": Both international and historical in scope, this paper focuses on the challenges faced by psychoanalysis today and sheds light on the internal ruptures it has faced over the last years. It offers a dialectical reading of these ruptures, understanding them as a confrontation between defenders of scientific vs. hermeneutical viewpoints; and it raises the question: are they incompatible? We urge both researchers and clinically-oriented analysts to go through the depressive position and adopt a strong pluralism, closely articulating clinical material and theorization. By critically analyzing the debates opposing D. Stern to A. Green, and I. Hoffman to M. N. Eagle and D. L. Wolitzky, then to J. Safran, we wish to stress the risks entailed by confining psychoanalysis into a rigidly hermeneutical stance, ignoring that a scientific stance can be open to complexity. This paper defends a strong pluralism. Its epistemological stance aims at offering a starting point to establish a living dialogue in our discipline, where the diversity of viewpoints needs to be taken seriously: overcoming excessive oppositions opens up new perspective both in research and clinical work.","PeriodicalId":199485,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopédie critique du genre","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130776435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：