首页 > 最新文献

Pain Practice最新文献

英文 中文
Comments on "Enhancing contrast distribution with the far lateral approach in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A retrospective analysis". 关于 "在腰椎穿孔硬膜外类固醇注射中使用远外侧入路增强造影剂分布:回顾性分析"。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13425
Min Cheol Chang, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Seoyon Yang
{"title":"Comments on \"Enhancing contrast distribution with the far lateral approach in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A retrospective analysis\".","authors":"Min Cheol Chang, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Seoyon Yang","doi":"10.1111/papr.13425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13425","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the effectiveness of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 比较普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁对腰椎病患者的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13424
Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Dong Hyuck Kim, Sang Gyu Kwak

Background: Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed to control neuropathic pain of lumbar radiculopathy. Few trials have compared the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB). Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the difference in effect between GBP and PGB in lumbar radiculopathy patients.

Methods: Articles which were published between January 1, 1960 and May 31, 2023 were investigated via Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Gabapentin was used as an intervention, and pregabalin as a comparison. As outcomes, pain rating scales including visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and number of adverse events (dizziness and sedation) were obtained.

Results: PGB showed statistically significant improvement in pain scale (VAS and NRS) in short-term follow-up (6 weeks or less) compared to GBP. (Total mean difference of -0.31) However, in the long-term follow-up (6 weeks to 12 weeks), there was no difference in pain reduction effect between two groups. The incidence of AEs showed no difference between two groups.

Conclusion: Based on this article, the existing evidence suggests that PGB was more effective in reducing pain of lumbar radiculopathy compared to GBP at the short-term follow-up, but there was no difference in the long-term follow-up. Physicians should consider this finding in prescribing medications for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

背景:加巴喷丁类药物通常用于控制腰椎病的神经性疼痛。很少有试验比较加巴喷丁(GBP)和普瑞巴林(PGB)的疗效。因此,作者进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较GBP和PGB在腰椎病患者中的疗效差异:通过 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Embase、Google Scholar 和 MEDLINE 调查了 1960 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间发表的文章。这项荟萃分析针对的是腰椎病患者。加巴喷丁作为干预药物,普瑞巴林作为对比药物。结果显示,包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)在内的疼痛评分量表以及不良反应(头晕和镇静)的数量均有所改善:与 GBP 相比,PGB 在短期随访(6 周或更短)中对疼痛评分表(VAS 和 NRS)的改善具有统计学意义。(但在长期随访(6 周至 12 周)中,两组在减轻疼痛效果方面没有差异。结论:根据这篇文章,现有证据表明,在短期随访中,PGB 比 GBP 更能有效减轻腰椎间盘突出症的疼痛,但在长期随访中并无差异。医生在为腰椎病患者开药时应考虑这一结果。
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Do Yun Kwon, Kwang-Ryeol Kim, Dong Hyuck Kim, Sang Gyu Kwak","doi":"10.1111/papr.13424","DOIUrl":"10.1111/papr.13424","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed to control neuropathic pain of lumbar radiculopathy. Few trials have compared the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB). Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the difference in effect between GBP and PGB in lumbar radiculopathy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles which were published between January 1, 1960 and May 31, 2023 were investigated via Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Gabapentin was used as an intervention, and pregabalin as a comparison. As outcomes, pain rating scales including visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and number of adverse events (dizziness and sedation) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PGB showed statistically significant improvement in pain scale (VAS and NRS) in short-term follow-up (6 weeks or less) compared to GBP. (Total mean difference of -0.31) However, in the long-term follow-up (6 weeks to 12 weeks), there was no difference in pain reduction effect between two groups. The incidence of AEs showed no difference between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this article, the existing evidence suggests that PGB was more effective in reducing pain of lumbar radiculopathy compared to GBP at the short-term follow-up, but there was no difference in the long-term follow-up. Physicians should consider this finding in prescribing medications for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683178/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142472319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sentiment analysis of letters of recommendation for a U.S. pain medicine fellowship from 2020 to 2023. 2020 年至 2023 年美国疼痛医学奖学金推荐信的情感分析。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13416
Christopher P Cheng, Vikram Vasan, Alopi M Patel, Paul R Shekane

Objectives: Letters of recommendation (LORs) are an important part of pain medicine fellowship applications that may be subject to implicit bias by the letter's author. This study evaluated letters of recommendation for applications to pain medicine fellowships in the United States to characterize biases and differences among applicants over four application cycles.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-site cohort study. De-identified LORs were collected from 2020 to 2023 from one institution. The Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) natural language processing package scored positive LOR sentiment. In addition, the deep learning tool, Empath, scored LORs for 15 sentiments. Wilcoxon rank-sum and one-way ANOVA tests compared scores between applicant demographics: gender, race, medical school type, residency specialty, and chief resident status, as well as letter writers' academic position.

Results: Nine hundred and sixty-four applications were studied over four application cycles. Program directors wrote fewer words (p = 0.020) and less positively (p < 0.001) compared to department chairs and letter writers with neither position. Department chairs wrote with less "negative emotion" compared to both program directors and writers with neither position (p < 0.001). Anesthesiologist applicants received more letters highlighting "achievement" (p < 0.001) while PM&R applicants submitted letters with less "negative emotion" (p < 0.001) compared to other specialties. Chief residents' letters scored higher in "leader" sentiment (p < 0.001) and lower in "negative emotion" (p < 0.001).

Discussion: Linguistic content did not favor certain genders or races over others. However, disparities in LORs do exist depending on an applicant's specialty and chief resident status, as well as the academic status of the letter writer.

目的:推荐信(LOR)是疼痛医学研究金申请的重要组成部分,可能会受到推荐信作者的隐性偏见影响。本研究评估了申请美国疼痛医学研究金的推荐信,以描述四个申请周期中申请人之间的偏见和差异:这是一项回顾性单点队列研究。从 2020 年到 2023 年,从一个机构收集了去身份化的 LOR。Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) 自然语言处理包对 LOR 的正面情感进行了评分。此外,深度学习工具 Empath 对 LOR 的 15 种情感进行了评分。Wilcoxon 秩和检验和单因子方差分析比较了不同申请人人口统计学特征的得分:性别、种族、医学院类型、住院医师专业、住院总医师身份以及写信人的学术职位:研究了四个申请周期中的964份申请。项目主任写的字数较少(p = 0.020),正面评价较少(p 讨论):语言内容并不偏向于某些性别或种族。然而,根据申请人的专业和总住院医师身份以及写信人的学术地位,LORs 中确实存在差异。
{"title":"Sentiment analysis of letters of recommendation for a U.S. pain medicine fellowship from 2020 to 2023.","authors":"Christopher P Cheng, Vikram Vasan, Alopi M Patel, Paul R Shekane","doi":"10.1111/papr.13416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Letters of recommendation (LORs) are an important part of pain medicine fellowship applications that may be subject to implicit bias by the letter's author. This study evaluated letters of recommendation for applications to pain medicine fellowships in the United States to characterize biases and differences among applicants over four application cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-site cohort study. De-identified LORs were collected from 2020 to 2023 from one institution. The Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner (VADER) natural language processing package scored positive LOR sentiment. In addition, the deep learning tool, Empath, scored LORs for 15 sentiments. Wilcoxon rank-sum and one-way ANOVA tests compared scores between applicant demographics: gender, race, medical school type, residency specialty, and chief resident status, as well as letter writers' academic position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred and sixty-four applications were studied over four application cycles. Program directors wrote fewer words (p = 0.020) and less positively (p < 0.001) compared to department chairs and letter writers with neither position. Department chairs wrote with less \"negative emotion\" compared to both program directors and writers with neither position (p < 0.001). Anesthesiologist applicants received more letters highlighting \"achievement\" (p < 0.001) while PM&R applicants submitted letters with less \"negative emotion\" (p < 0.001) compared to other specialties. Chief residents' letters scored higher in \"leader\" sentiment (p < 0.001) and lower in \"negative emotion\" (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Linguistic content did not favor certain genders or races over others. However, disparities in LORs do exist depending on an applicant's specialty and chief resident status, as well as the academic status of the letter writer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
8. Herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia. 8.带状疱疹和疱疹后神经痛。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13423
Elisabeth J M Adriaansen, Julien G Jacobs, Lisette M Vernooij, Albert J M van Wijck, Steven P Cohen, Frank J P M Huygen, Mienke Rijsdijk

Introduction: Patients suffering from postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) report unilateral chronic pain in one or more dermatomes after an acute herpes zoster (HZ) infection. The incidence of acute HZ ranges between three and five patients per 1000 person-years. In one out of four patients, acute HZ-related pain will transition into PHN. PHN can be very disabling for patients and reduce quality of life. Additionally, the treatment of PHN is characterized by high failure rates. The aim of this review is to give an update on the previous practical guideline published in 2011 and revised in 2015 (published in 2019) and to provide an overview of current interventional treatment options for HZ infection and PHN.

Methods: The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of HZ and PHN was systematically reviewed and summarized.

Results: The most important treatment for acute HZ-related pain is antiviral therapy within 72 h of symptom onset. Additional symptomatic treatment options are analgesic drugs according to the WHO pain ladder, tricyclic antidepressants (eg, nortriptyline), and antiepileptic drugs (eg, gabapentin). If pain is not sufficiently reduced, interventional treatment such as an epidural injection with local anesthetics and corticosteroids or pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are options. Treatment for PHN is preferably transdermal capsaicin, lidocaine, or oral drugs such as antidepressants or antiepileptics.

Conclusions: Treatment of acute HZ-related pain especially PHN is challenging. Besides the conventional treatment for PHN, interventional management is considered a new treatment option. PRF of DRG seems to be the most promising interventional management.

导言:带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)患者在急性带状疱疹(HZ)感染后会出现一个或多个皮节的单侧慢性疼痛。急性 HZ 的发病率为每千人年 3 到 5 例。每四名患者中就有一人会将急性 HZ 相关疼痛转变为 PHN。PHN 会严重影响患者的工作和生活质量。此外,PHN 的治疗失败率也很高。本综述旨在对之前于 2011 年发布、2015 年修订(2019 年发布)的实用指南进行更新,并概述目前针对 HZ 感染和 PHN 的介入治疗方案:方法:系统回顾并总结了有关 HZ 和 PHN 诊断和治疗的文献:急性 HZ 相关疼痛最重要的治疗方法是在症状出现 72 小时内进行抗病毒治疗。其他对症治疗方法包括根据世界卫生组织疼痛阶梯标准使用镇痛药、三环类抗抑郁药(如去甲替林)和抗癫痫药(如加巴喷丁)。如果疼痛不能得到充分缓解,则可选择介入治疗,如硬膜外注射局麻药和皮质类固醇,或对背根神经节(DRG)进行脉冲射频治疗。PHN的治疗最好采用透皮辣椒素、利多卡因或口服药物,如抗抑郁药或抗癫痫药:急性 HZ 相关疼痛(尤其是 PHN)的治疗具有挑战性。除了传统的 PHN 治疗方法外,介入治疗被认为是一种新的治疗方法。DRG的PRF似乎是最有前途的介入治疗方法。
{"title":"8. Herpes zoster and post herpetic neuralgia.","authors":"Elisabeth J M Adriaansen, Julien G Jacobs, Lisette M Vernooij, Albert J M van Wijck, Steven P Cohen, Frank J P M Huygen, Mienke Rijsdijk","doi":"10.1111/papr.13423","DOIUrl":"10.1111/papr.13423","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients suffering from postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) report unilateral chronic pain in one or more dermatomes after an acute herpes zoster (HZ) infection. The incidence of acute HZ ranges between three and five patients per 1000 person-years. In one out of four patients, acute HZ-related pain will transition into PHN. PHN can be very disabling for patients and reduce quality of life. Additionally, the treatment of PHN is characterized by high failure rates. The aim of this review is to give an update on the previous practical guideline published in 2011 and revised in 2015 (published in 2019) and to provide an overview of current interventional treatment options for HZ infection and PHN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of HZ and PHN was systematically reviewed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important treatment for acute HZ-related pain is antiviral therapy within 72 h of symptom onset. Additional symptomatic treatment options are analgesic drugs according to the WHO pain ladder, tricyclic antidepressants (eg, nortriptyline), and antiepileptic drugs (eg, gabapentin). If pain is not sufficiently reduced, interventional treatment such as an epidural injection with local anesthetics and corticosteroids or pulsed radiofrequency of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) are options. Treatment for PHN is preferably transdermal capsaicin, lidocaine, or oral drugs such as antidepressants or antiepileptics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment of acute HZ-related pain especially PHN is challenging. Besides the conventional treatment for PHN, interventional management is considered a new treatment option. PRF of DRG seems to be the most promising interventional management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142372518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adherence to ESMO guidelines on cancer pain management and their applicability to specialist palliative care centers: An observational, prospective, and multicenter study. ESMO癌症疼痛管理指南的遵守情况及其对专科姑息治疗中心的适用性:一项观察性、前瞻性和多中心研究。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13418
L Carbonara, G Casale, M G De Marinis, C Bosetti, A Valle, P Carinci, M R D'andrea, O Corli

Introduction: Pain management in late-stage cancer patients is a complex clinical problem. The historical guidelines were from the World Health Organization (WHO). Recently, ESMO produced guidelines consistent with 52 recommendations applicable to the entire period of disease since the pain appears.

Aim: To evaluate the appropriateness and applicability of ESMO guidelines (EGL) in advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care.

Method: An observational, prospective, multicentric study conducted by specialist palliative care centers on cancer patients in the advanced stage. The 52 recommendations were divided into eight macro areas. The adherence levels were expressed as a percentage for each recommendation and have been broken down as high (>75%), medium (50%-75%), and low (<50%). In the case of not adhering to a recommendation, the comment was "not applicable" (NA) or not evaluable (NE).

Results: Four hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five recommendations were considered NA or NE, especially because their application took too long to achieve clinical results, given the condition of the patients. Some interesting opinions on the choice of drugs emerged. At the end of the study, pain dropped from 5.0 to 2.6, patients' satisfaction increased from 3.3 to 4.6, and quality of life improved from 4.4 to 5.5.

Conclusions: Palliative physicians' adherence to EGL was medium. The main contribution of this study was to evaluate their applicability and clinical results in far-advanced patients assisted by palliative care. The selection of useful recommendations and expert opinions can make a contribution to clinical practice.

导言癌症晚期患者的疼痛治疗是一个复杂的临床问题。世界卫生组织(WHO)曾制定过相关指南。目的:评估ESMO指南(EGL)在接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者中的适宜性和适用性:方法:由专业姑息治疗中心对晚期癌症患者进行观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究。52 项建议被分为 8 个宏观领域。每项建议的遵从程度以百分比表示,并分为高(>75%)、中(50%-75%)和低(结果:研究共招募了 476 名患者。有 35 项建议被认为是 NA 或 NE,特别是因为考虑到患者的病情,这些建议的应用需要太长时间才能取得临床效果。在药物选择方面出现了一些有趣的观点。研究结束时,疼痛从5.0分降至2.6分,患者满意度从3.3分升至4.6分,生活质量从4.4分升至5.5分:姑息治疗医生对 EGL 的依从性为中等。本研究的主要贡献在于评估了其在姑息治疗辅助下对晚期患者的适用性和临床效果。选择有用的建议和专家意见可为临床实践做出贡献。
{"title":"Adherence to ESMO guidelines on cancer pain management and their applicability to specialist palliative care centers: An observational, prospective, and multicenter study.","authors":"L Carbonara, G Casale, M G De Marinis, C Bosetti, A Valle, P Carinci, M R D'andrea, O Corli","doi":"10.1111/papr.13418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pain management in late-stage cancer patients is a complex clinical problem. The historical guidelines were from the World Health Organization (WHO). Recently, ESMO produced guidelines consistent with 52 recommendations applicable to the entire period of disease since the pain appears.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the appropriateness and applicability of ESMO guidelines (EGL) in advanced cancer patients admitted to palliative care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational, prospective, multicentric study conducted by specialist palliative care centers on cancer patients in the advanced stage. The 52 recommendations were divided into eight macro areas. The adherence levels were expressed as a percentage for each recommendation and have been broken down as high (>75%), medium (50%-75%), and low (<50%). In the case of not adhering to a recommendation, the comment was \"not applicable\" (NA) or not evaluable (NE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five recommendations were considered NA or NE, especially because their application took too long to achieve clinical results, given the condition of the patients. Some interesting opinions on the choice of drugs emerged. At the end of the study, pain dropped from 5.0 to 2.6, patients' satisfaction increased from 3.3 to 4.6, and quality of life improved from 4.4 to 5.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palliative physicians' adherence to EGL was medium. The main contribution of this study was to evaluate their applicability and clinical results in far-advanced patients assisted by palliative care. The selection of useful recommendations and expert opinions can make a contribution to clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Authors' response to the letter to the editor on: Differences in efficacy and safety between intrathecal infusion devices in cancer pain. 作者对致编辑的信的回复:不同鞘内输注装置治疗癌痛的疗效和安全性差异。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13422
Diego Díaz-Rodríguez, Isabel M Fontán-Atalaya, Estefanía Peralta-Espinosa, Bartolomé Fernández-Torres
{"title":"Authors' response to the letter to the editor on: Differences in efficacy and safety between intrathecal infusion devices in cancer pain.","authors":"Diego Díaz-Rodríguez, Isabel M Fontán-Atalaya, Estefanía Peralta-Espinosa, Bartolomé Fernández-Torres","doi":"10.1111/papr.13422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13422","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Caution: Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block is not entirely safe. 注意事项超声引导下的肋间神经阻滞并非完全安全。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13420
Yuko Nakano, Rieko Oishi, Satoki Inoue
{"title":"Caution: Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block is not entirely safe.","authors":"Yuko Nakano, Rieko Oishi, Satoki Inoue","doi":"10.1111/papr.13420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13420","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
12. Vascular pain: Ischemic pain in the extremities and Raynaud's syndrome 12. 血管性疼痛 四肢缺血性疼痛和雷诺综合征。
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13421
Antal van der Gaag, Steven P Cohen, Milan P Stojanovic, Frank J P M Huygen, Jan Willem Kallewaard

Introduction: Peripheral artery diseases (PAD) and Raynaud's syndrome are associated with substantial morbidity. PAD, through the restriction of blood flow to the extremities, may lead to critical limb ischemia with symptoms of pain at rest which may eventually progress to severe limb ischemia with gangrene. This serious and painful clinical condition requires extensive medical care, is limb-threatening and, in case of delayed or unsuccessful treatment, is associated with a high mortality rate. In Raynaud's syndrome, the blood supply to certain parts of the body, usually the fingers and toes and less frequently the nose or ears, is restricted because of vasculopathy of the smaller vessels at acral sites. Under certain circumstances, with cold as the most well-known provoking factor, blood flow restriction occurs, leading to demarcated color changes and symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, and numbness. In severe cases of Raynaud syndrome tissue ischemia may lead to necrosis and the need for amputation of the affected area.

Methods: In this narrative review, the literature on the diagnosis and interventional pain treatment of PAD and Raynaud's syndrome was updated and summarized.

Objectives: This review focused on interventional pain treatment. In PAD, the effects of the intervention on limb salvage, ulcer healing, and ischemic pain were summarized. Additionally, results with respect to skin microcirculation and quality of life were reported if available. In Raynaud's syndrome, we focused on the effect of the intervention on peripheral blood flow metrics and pain intensity during attacks.

Results: In PAD, prevention and treatment of risk factors are important. Initially, conservative treatment and pharmacological therapy are preferred first-line therapies. However, when disease progression occurs, interventional management may be considered. The literature search yielded conflicting evidence for sympathectomy as a treatment for PAD. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a treatment modality for advanced PAD had high-quality evidence for limb salvage in subgroups of patients but conflicting evidence for other outcome measures such as pain, wound healing, and quality of life. The literature search for interventional pain management in Raynaud's syndrome was limited to only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) studying the effect of thoracic sympathectomy. This study had several limitations and hence the level of evidence for this interventional treatment is very low. No RCTs studying SCS in patients with Raynaud's syndrome were found.

Conclusions: In both PAD and Raynaud's syndrome, additional RCTs are needed to substantiate interventional (pain) management and bolster the evidence base for sympathectomy and SCS as treatment options.

导言:外周动脉疾病(PAD)和雷诺综合征与严重的发病率有关。PAD 通过限制肢体血流,可能导致肢体严重缺血,并伴有静息时疼痛的症状,最终可能发展为肢体严重缺血并伴有坏疽。这种严重而痛苦的临床症状需要广泛的医疗护理,会危及肢体,如果治疗延误或不成功,死亡率很高。在雷诺氏综合征中,身体某些部位(通常是手指和脚趾,较少见的是鼻子或耳朵)的血液供应受到限制,原因是尖锐部位的小血管发生病变。在某些情况下,最常见的诱发因素是寒冷,血流受限会导致明显的颜色变化以及疼痛、麻痹和麻木等症状。在雷诺综合征的严重病例中,组织缺血可能导致坏死,需要截肢:在这篇叙事性综述中,对有关 PAD 和雷诺综合征的诊断和介入性疼痛治疗的文献进行了更新和总结:本综述侧重于介入性疼痛治疗。在 PAD 中,总结了干预对肢体挽救、溃疡愈合和缺血性疼痛的影响。此外,还报告了皮肤微循环和生活质量方面的结果(如果有的话)。对于雷诺氏综合征,我们重点研究了干预措施对外周血流指标和发作时疼痛强度的影响:结果:对于 PAD,预防和治疗危险因素非常重要。最初,保守治疗和药物治疗是首选的一线疗法。然而,当疾病进展时,可考虑进行介入治疗。文献检索结果显示,交感神经切除术作为 PAD 治疗方法的证据相互矛盾。脊髓刺激(SCS)作为晚期 PAD 的一种治疗方式,在亚组患者的肢体挽救方面有高质量的证据,但在疼痛、伤口愈合和生活质量等其他结局指标方面的证据相互矛盾。有关雷诺氏综合征介入性疼痛治疗的文献搜索仅限于一项研究胸交感神经切除术效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。该研究存在一些局限性,因此这种介入治疗的证据水平很低。没有发现研究雷诺氏综合征患者SCS的随机对照试验:结论:对于 PAD 和雷诺氏综合征,需要更多的 RCT 来证实介入性(疼痛)治疗,并加强交感神经切除术和 SCS 作为治疗方案的证据基础。
{"title":"12. Vascular pain: Ischemic pain in the extremities and Raynaud's syndrome","authors":"Antal van der Gaag, Steven P Cohen, Milan P Stojanovic, Frank J P M Huygen, Jan Willem Kallewaard","doi":"10.1111/papr.13421","DOIUrl":"10.1111/papr.13421","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral artery diseases (PAD) and Raynaud's syndrome are associated with substantial morbidity. PAD, through the restriction of blood flow to the extremities, may lead to critical limb ischemia with symptoms of pain at rest which may eventually progress to severe limb ischemia with gangrene. This serious and painful clinical condition requires extensive medical care, is limb-threatening and, in case of delayed or unsuccessful treatment, is associated with a high mortality rate. In Raynaud's syndrome, the blood supply to certain parts of the body, usually the fingers and toes and less frequently the nose or ears, is restricted because of vasculopathy of the smaller vessels at acral sites. Under certain circumstances, with cold as the most well-known provoking factor, blood flow restriction occurs, leading to demarcated color changes and symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, and numbness. In severe cases of Raynaud syndrome tissue ischemia may lead to necrosis and the need for amputation of the affected area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this narrative review, the literature on the diagnosis and interventional pain treatment of PAD and Raynaud's syndrome was updated and summarized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review focused on interventional pain treatment. In PAD, the effects of the intervention on limb salvage, ulcer healing, and ischemic pain were summarized. Additionally, results with respect to skin microcirculation and quality of life were reported if available. In Raynaud's syndrome, we focused on the effect of the intervention on peripheral blood flow metrics and pain intensity during attacks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PAD, prevention and treatment of risk factors are important. Initially, conservative treatment and pharmacological therapy are preferred first-line therapies. However, when disease progression occurs, interventional management may be considered. The literature search yielded conflicting evidence for sympathectomy as a treatment for PAD. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a treatment modality for advanced PAD had high-quality evidence for limb salvage in subgroups of patients but conflicting evidence for other outcome measures such as pain, wound healing, and quality of life. The literature search for interventional pain management in Raynaud's syndrome was limited to only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) studying the effect of thoracic sympathectomy. This study had several limitations and hence the level of evidence for this interventional treatment is very low. No RCTs studying SCS in patients with Raynaud's syndrome were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In both PAD and Raynaud's syndrome, additional RCTs are needed to substantiate interventional (pain) management and bolster the evidence base for sympathectomy and SCS as treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidural venous plexus engorgement: A rare cause of low back pain. 硬膜外静脉丛充血:腰背痛的罕见病因
IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13419
Pelin Analay, Alp Çetin
{"title":"Epidural venous plexus engorgement: A rare cause of low back pain.","authors":"Pelin Analay, Alp Çetin","doi":"10.1111/papr.13419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13419","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Semi‐invasive therapies for pain in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis 治疗膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的半侵入性疗法:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13404
Siew‐Li Goh, Melissa Wee Chong, Jerri Ling, Zulkarnain Jaafar, Zhuang‐Li Lim, May‐Yann Yau, Terence Ong, Jim Richards
BackgroundThe increasing number of semi‐invasive pain therapies in knee osteoarthritis poses challenges in decision‐making. This review aimed to simultaneously compare established intra‐articular therapies with newer peri‐articular therapies and explore effect modifiers.MethodsRandomized controlled trials were searched from five electronic databases without date or language restrictions. Study selection and data extraction of reports, retrieved up to May 2024, were performed independently by paired assessors. The primary outcome was 6‐month pain score. Nine treatments were included. The effect size (ES) for each treatment, relative to placebo, was estimated using standardized means difference and expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The rigor of results was evaluated with subgroup/sensitivity analyses.ResultsA total of 111 studies (14,695 participants) were included, with intra‐articular hyaluronic acid having the greatest number of participants. Neuroablation demonstrated the greatest ES (1.08, 95% CI: 0.07, 2.10). While platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) ranked second (ES: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.22), it was the only intervention demonstrating statistically significant effect at 3, 6, and 12 months. However, this statistical significance was lost in some sensitivity analyses. Larger estimates for biologics and PRP compared with prolotherapy, steroid, and hyaluronic acid injections were consistently observed across different timepoints and in multiple sensitivity analyses. Generally, no statistically significant difference was found between the nine types of therapies.ConclusionAlthough there is robust evidence suggesting greater efficacy of PRP, potentially including biologics, over other interventions, future research is needed to identify the phenotype or patient subgroup that would benefit most from PRP.
背景膝关节骨关节炎的半侵入性疼痛疗法越来越多,给决策带来了挑战。本综述旨在同时比较既有的关节内疗法和较新的关节周围疗法,并探讨效果调节因素。方法在五个电子数据库中检索随机对照试验,无日期或语言限制。截至 2024 年 5 月检索到的研究选择和报告数据提取均由配对评估员独立完成。主要结果为 6 个月的疼痛评分。共纳入九种治疗方法。每种疗法相对于安慰剂的效应大小 (ES) 采用标准化均值差估算,并用 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示。结果 共纳入了 111 项研究(14,695 人参与),其中关节内透明质酸的参与人数最多。神经消融的ES值最大(1.08,95% CI:0.07,2.10)。富血小板血浆 (PRP) 排名第二(ES:0.75,95% CI:0.28,1.22),是唯一一种在 3、6 和 12 个月时具有显著统计学效果的干预方法。然而,在一些敏感性分析中,这种统计学意义消失了。在不同的时间点和多个敏感性分析中,均持续观察到生物制剂和 PRP 与增殖疗法、类固醇和透明质酸注射相比,具有更大的估计值。结论虽然有确凿证据表明 PRP(可能包括生物制剂)比其他干预措施具有更高的疗效,但未来仍需开展研究,以确定从 PRP 中获益最多的表型或患者亚群。
{"title":"Semi‐invasive therapies for pain in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis","authors":"Siew‐Li Goh, Melissa Wee Chong, Jerri Ling, Zulkarnain Jaafar, Zhuang‐Li Lim, May‐Yann Yau, Terence Ong, Jim Richards","doi":"10.1111/papr.13404","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13404","url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe increasing number of semi‐invasive pain therapies in knee osteoarthritis poses challenges in decision‐making. This review aimed to simultaneously compare established intra‐articular therapies with newer peri‐articular therapies and explore effect modifiers.MethodsRandomized controlled trials were searched from five electronic databases without date or language restrictions. Study selection and data extraction of reports, retrieved up to May 2024, were performed independently by paired assessors. The primary outcome was 6‐month pain score. Nine treatments were included. The effect size (ES) for each treatment, relative to placebo, was estimated using standardized means difference and expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The rigor of results was evaluated with subgroup/sensitivity analyses.ResultsA total of 111 studies (14,695 participants) were included, with intra‐articular hyaluronic acid having the greatest number of participants. Neuroablation demonstrated the greatest ES (1.08, 95% CI: 0.07, 2.10). While platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) ranked second (ES: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.28, 1.22), it was the only intervention demonstrating statistically significant effect at 3, 6, and 12 months. However, this statistical significance was lost in some sensitivity analyses. Larger estimates for biologics and PRP compared with prolotherapy, steroid, and hyaluronic acid injections were consistently observed across different timepoints and in multiple sensitivity analyses. Generally, no statistically significant difference was found between the nine types of therapies.ConclusionAlthough there is robust evidence suggesting greater efficacy of PRP, potentially including biologics, over other interventions, future research is needed to identify the phenotype or patient subgroup that would benefit most from PRP.","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142268624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain Practice
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1