Pain Practice最新文献

Introduction: Chronic pain can negatively impact a child's quality of life. Pediatric Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment (IIPT) programs aim to improve overall functioning despite pain through various rehabilitative strategies. It is, however, unclear whether improved function corresponds to self-reported decrease in pain levels. Hence, the purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between changes in physical function and perceived pain among children with chronic pain who have undergone inpatient IIPT.

Materials and methods: A secondary analysis of pre-existing databases of IIPT from two different inpatient acute rehabilitation programs was carried out. Children and adolescents (N = 309; age = 16.2 ± 2.6; 79% females) with chronic pain who attended on average 4-week inpatient IIPT from Nov 2011 to Jan 2023 were included. Participants completed pain intensity (Numerical Pain Rating Scale) and self-reported function measures (Lower Extremity Functional Scale [LEFS], Upper Extremity Functional Index [UEFI], Canadian Occupational Performance Measure [COPM]-Performance, and COPM-Satisfaction) at admission and discharge.

Results: Change in self-reported physical function was significantly associated with change in pain from admission to discharge. After covariate adjustment, self-reported physical function (per the LEFS, UEFI, COPM-Performance, and COPM-Satisfaction) explained 19.8%, 7.8%, 12.0%, and 8.6% of the variance in change in pain, respectively. These measures of self-reported physical function further distinguished between minimal (<30%) and moderate (≥30%) pain reduction.

Conclusions: Self-reported functional gains during IIPT are associated with greater change in perceived pain. Moreover, measures of self-reported physical function can help identify children at risk of minimal pain reduction post-IIPT.

Introduction: Pain from the cervical facet joints, either due to degenerative conditions or due to whiplash-related trauma, is very common in the general population. Here, we provide an overview of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical facet-related pain with special emphasis on interventional treatment techniques.

Methods: A literature search on the diagnosis and treatment of cervical facet joint pain and whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. All relevant literature was retrieved and summarized.

Results: Facet-related pain is typically diagnosed based on history and physical examination of the patients, combined with a diagnostic block (eg, with local anesthetic) of the medial branches innervating the joints. There is no additive value for imaging techniques to diagnose cervical facet pain, but imaging may be used for procedure planning. First-line therapy for pain treatment includes focused exercise, graded activity, and range-of-motion training. Pharmacological treatment may be considered for acute facet joint pain; however, for chronic facet joint pain, evidence for pharmacological treatment is lacking. Considering the lack of evidence for treatment with botulinum toxin, intra-articular steroid injections, or surgery, these interventions are not recommended. Diagnostic blocks are not considered a viable treatment option, though some patients may experience a prolonged analgesic effect. Long-term analgesia (>6 months) has been observed for radiofrequency treatment of the medial branches.

Conclusions: Cervical facet pain is diagnosed based on history, physical examination, and a diagnostic block of the medial branches innervating the painful joints. Conservative management, including exercise therapy, is the first line of treatment. When conservative management does not result in adequate improvement of pain, radiofrequency treatment of the medial branches should be considered, which often results in adequate pain relief.

Background: Nonthermal, pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy (PSWT) is a nonpharmacologic, noninvasive modality that limited evidence suggests provides analgesia. Its potential favorable risk-benefit ratio stems from its lack of side effects and significant medical risks, applicability to any anatomic location, long treatment duration, and ease of application by simply affixing it with tape. Even with a relatively small treatment effect, PSWT might contribute to a multimodal analgesic regimen, similar to acetaminophen. However, widespread clinical use is hindered by a lack of systematic evidence. The current randomized, controlled pilot study was undertaken to determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent definitive investigation and estimate the treatment effect of PSWT on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Methods: Within the recovery room following primary knee and hip arthroplasty, cholecystectomy, hernia repair, and non-mastectomy breast surgery, we applied 1-3 PSWT devices (Model 088, BioElectronics Corporation, Frederick, Maryland) over the surgical bandages. Participants were randomized to 28 days of either active or sham treatment in a double-masked fashion. The outcomes of primary interest were the cumulative opioid consumption and the mean of the "average" and "worst" daily pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale over the first 7 postoperative days.

Results: During the first 7 postoperative days, oxycodone consumption in participants given active treatment (n = 55) was a mean (SD) of 21 mg (24) versus 17 mg (26) in patients given sham (n = 57): difference 4 (95% CI, -5 to 13), p = 0.376. During this same period, the "average" daily pain intensity in patients given active treatment was 2.4 (1.6) versus 2.6 (1.7) in sham: difference -0.2 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.5), p = 0.597. Concurrently, the worst/maximum pain for the active group was 4.6 (2.0) versus 4.7 (2.1) in sham: difference -0.1 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.7), p = 0.888. No device-related systemic side effects or serious adverse events were identified.

Conclusions: Pulsed shortwave (radiofrequency) therapy did not reduce pain scores and opioid requirements to a statistically significant or clinically relevant degree during the initial postoperative week in this pilot study. These results must be replicated with a subsequent study before being considered definitive. Data from this preliminary study may be used to help plan future trials.

Objectives: In this study, the spread of methylene blue was compared between an ultrasound-guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block and a double injection technique, where the approach towards the inferomedial acetabulum was added to the latter.

Methods: The two techniques were performed in 11 fresh frozen cadavers. The spread was measured after anatomical dissection in which the supplying femoral and obturator nerves were identified.

Results and conclusion: Our study demonstrates adequate staining of the iliac bone with comparable distal and medial spread in both techniques, indicating that the PENG block with a single injection is adequate in blocking the hip capsule with 10 mL local anesthetics. Staining of the femoral nerve occurred in 2/6 specimens after the PENG block, and staining of the obturator nerve in 1 specimen in each group.

Introduction: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) and occipital neuralgia (ON) are headaches originating in the occiput and that radiate to the vertex. Because of the intimate relationship between structures based in the occiput and those in the upper cervical region, there is significant overlap between the presentation of CEH and ON. Diagnosis starts with a headache history to assess for diagnostic criteria formulated by the International Headache Society. Physical examination evaluates range of motion of the neck and the presence of tender areas or pressure points.

Methods: The literature for the diagnosis and treatment of CEH and ON was searched from 2015 through August 2022, retrieved, and summarized.

Results: Conservative treatment includes pain education and self-care, analgesic medication, physical therapy (such as reducing secondary muscle tension and improving posture), the use of TENS (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), or a combination of the aforementioned treatments. Injection at various anatomical locations with local anesthetic with or without corticosteroids can provide pain relief for a short period. Deep cervical plexus block can result in improved pain for less than 6 months. In both CEH and ON, an occipital nerve block can provide important diagnostic information and improve pain in some patients, with PRF providing greater long-term pain control. Radiofrequency ablation of the cervical facet joints can result in improvement for over 1 year. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) should be considered for the treatment of refractory ON.

Conclusion: The treatment of CEH preferentially consists of radiofrequency treatment of the facet joints, while for ON, pulsed radiofrequency of the occipital nerves is indicated. For refractory cases, ONS may be considered.

Introduction: Pain management in patients with complete spinal cord injury is complex.

Case report: We report a successful case of managing neuropathic, phantom limb, and back pain below the level of spinal cord injury (T5 American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] A) using a 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulator (SCS) over a 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of this approach may be attributed to its ability to modulate supraspinal pain processing, allowing for targeted relief of various pain mechanisms below the level of injury.

Background: Community reintegration is an important goal for people living with a spinal cord injury (SCI), and pain is suspected to limit reintegration due to its limitations in daily functioning, mood, and sleep.

Objectives: To determine the influence of pain on community reintegration in manual wheelchair users with SCI.

Methods: The Reintegration to Normal Living Index was used to determine community reintegration, while the DN4 and the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index were used to determine the presence of neuropathic and shoulder pain respectively. Associations and differences between the pain variables and participants with and without pain were analyzed with Spearman correlations and Mann-Whitney U-tests using SPSS v27 at 0.05 significance level and 95% confidence interval.

Results: Of the 122 participants, 85.2% reported current pain, with a 77.7% median for community reintegration. Neuropathic pain (53.3%) was more common and severe than nociceptive shoulder pain (14.8%). There was no significant difference in community reintegration between participants with and without pain, nor any correlation between the overall presence of pain and community reintegration. The severity of pain, particularly shoulder pain, was negatively associated with taking trips out of town (p < 0.01), and overall community reintegration (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: It is not the mere presence of pain that influences community reintegration, but rather the severity and the location of pain. Shoulder care and pain management need to be included in the rehabilitation program, as these are important considerations when rehabilitating people with SCI back into their communities.