Introduction: Varicose veins (VV) negatively impact quality of life (QoL) and have risks of major complications including bleeding, ulceration and phlebitis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the VSGBI (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland) and GIRFT (Get It Right First Time) classified VVs as lowest priority for intervention.
Objective: This study aims to determine harm caused and the impact on the QoL on patients waiting for their VVs procedures for more than 1 year.
Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH). Patients with VVs awaiting intervention for >1 year were included in the study. Patients with CEAP C6 disease were considered to be too high risk to be invited for treatment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were sent QoL questionnaires and underwent a telephone consultation to assess harm. Both generic (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D) and disease-specific (AVVQ and CIVIQ-14) instruments were utilised. There were no control groups available for comparison.
Results: 275 patients were identified (37.1% male) with median time on waiting list of 60 weeks (IQR 56-65). 19 patients (6.9%) came to major harm, including phlebitis (3.6%), bleeding (1.8%) and ulceration (1.8%). Fifty-two patients (18.9%) had minor harm, including worsening pain (12.7%) and swelling (6.2%). 6.9% reported psychological harm. Rising CEAP stage was also associated with worsening level of harm in patients with C5-6 disease (p < 0.0001). Only 8.7% stated they would decline surgery during the pandemic. 104 QoL questionnaires were returned. Median EQ-VAS and EQ-5D was 75 (IQR: 60-85) and 0.685 (0.566-0.761), respectively. Median AVVQ score was 23.2 (14.9-31.0) and CIVIQ-14 score was 33 (21-44).ConclusionsThis study highlights the impact of delaying VVs surgery during a pandemic. A significant rate of both major and minor as well as psychological harm was reported. In addition, VVs had a significant detriment to quality of life.
Objectives: It is unclear whether reflux time independently correlates with severity of symptoms in patients with great saphenous vein reflux.
Methods: Eighty patients (mean age 64+/-12.7 years, 56% female) undergoing great saphenous vein (GSV) ablation for symptomatic reflux were assessed prospectively. Fifty-seven underwent ablation with radiofrequency, 23 with cyanoacrylate adhesive. Venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was assessed at, or prior to the time of ablation. The highest reflux time in the GSV was selected.
Results: VCSS values ranged from 2 to 20 (median 7). Mean reflux time was 5.3 s (+/-3.3). The Spearman rank correlation yielded a value of rs = -0.123, p (2-tailed) = .279, which was not significant. The patients with concomitant deep vein reflux had higher VCSS (p < .05). Analysis of patients with only superficial vein reflux (n = 45) also demonstrated a poor correlation between VCSS and reflux time (rs = -0.051, p (2-tailed) = .741).
Conclusion: This prospective study did not demonstrate a correlation between reflux time and VCSS.
Purpose: This study evaluated the results of polidocanol sclerotherapy in the treatment of venous malformations (VM) including patient satisfaction, perceived improvement, and predictors of satisfaction.
Material and method: Patients with VM that underwent polidocanol foam sclerotherapy between June 2013 and July 2021 in a single center were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, VM, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction were analyzed with a questionnaire.
Results: This study included 232 (136, 58.6%, female) patients. The mean age was 24.49 ± 12.45 years (range 3-72). The clinical response rate was 82.3%. The rate of satisfaction was 82.3%, and 116 (50%) patients were significantly satisfied. There were no major complications. Clinical response and VM margin were related to satisfaction (p < 0.01, p = 0.012, respectively). Clinical response to pretreatment swelling was related to significant satisfaction (p = 0.02).
Conclusion: Polidocanol sclerotherapy was safe and effective in VM treatment with high satisfaction and low complication rates.
Introduction: This study investigated the current status of patients' knowledge and clinical compliance with ankle pump exercises in order to better enhance patient education and improve patient compliance with ankle pump exercises.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of the current status of ankle pump exercise awareness and compliance was conducted using a self-designed questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of a general demographic information questionnaire, a questionnaire on patients' perceptions of ankle pump exercise and a compliance questionnaire.
Results: A total of 2,203 patients from 53 clinical departments participated in this survey. 87.8% of patients considered ankle pump exercise important, 92.1% could grasp the knowledge of ankle pump exercise, 48.5% could self-monitor and exercise daily as instructed, 81.5% of health care workers would often supervise patients to complete ankle pump exercise, poor self-control (34.6%), lack of physical strength (21.1%) and perceived hassle (18.9%) were the top 3 factors contributing to patients' inability to complete the ankle pump exercise. Regression analysis showed that the factors influencing patients' compliance with the ankle pump exercise were literacy, economic level, number of comorbidities and caprini risk class (p < .05).
Conclusion: The patient's cognition of ankle pump exercise is good, but the compliance needs to be improved. It is suggested that the compliance of ankle pump exercise in hospitalized patients should be improved in the future to reduce the incidence of Venous thromboembolism.
Objectives: Exercise improves haemodynamic parameters in patients with chronic venous disease. There is a paucity of evidence on its effect in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). The aim of this systematic review is to assess the impact of exercise in PTS.
Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines and following PROSPERO registration (CRD42021220924), MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE database, and trial registries were searched on 19th May 2022.
Results: One article met the inclusion criteria and a narrative synthesis was carried out. The included randomised controlled trial reported a between-group mean difference of 4.6 points (p = .027) in the VEINES-QOL score and -2.0 points (p = .14) in the Villalta score, in favour of exercise therapy. The statistical significance threshold was not reached.
Conclusion: Data on exercise in PTS remains sparse but exercise appears to be a safe intervention. In the context of this literature, a potential future trial and outcome reporting measures are suggested.
Objective: To study the role of hyaluronic acid (HA) in polidocanol (POL) foam.
Methods: The dose-dependent effect of HA-POL on cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) as well as foam stability was evaluated by measuring optical density (OD) values and foam half-life time (FHT), respectively. An in vitro model was utilized for estimating the foam blood-displacement capacity by adopting maximum displacement distance (MDD) and displacement time. A comparison of foam viscosity was also carried out.
Results: The OD values of HUVECs treated with HA first increased and then decreased with the growing dosage of HA while cells treated with HA-POL died. Both FHT and displacement time were prolonged statistically with a gradually enhanced foam viscosity. As to MDD, there were no significant differences.
Conclusions: HA was found to promote HUVECs proliferation slightly, but this was almost negligible when compared to the cell-killing capacity of 1% POL. The viscosity of POL foam was enhanced by HA indicating its positive correlation with both stability and displacement capacity of POL foam.
Background/aims: Obesity affects over two-thirds of the Australian population and is associated with increased risk of venous leg ulceration (VLU). Management is challenging to both patients and staff. Surgical treatment of superficial venous incompetence in patients with VLU reduces ulcer healing time and recurrence, but this has not yet been investigated in patients with obesity. We aimed to determine in patients with VLU and morbid obesity if their ultrasound pattern of superficial venous incompetence was like those patients without morbid obesity.
Methods: Consecutive patients attending the outpatient leg ulcer clinic from January to December 2019 were eligible for inclusion if they had an active or healed VLU. Age, gender, BMI, and ulcer sidedness were collected from the electronic medical record and assessed against findings of venous duplex ultrasound. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with morbid obesity with superficial venous incompetence. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with morbid obesity who were investigated with a duplex ultrasound, and any presence of deep venous incompetence.
Results: Of 231 patients that attended 156 were eligible for inclusion. 103 patients had full data and were used for the primary outcome analysis. There were 29 patients (28.2%) with morbid obesity. They were younger than those without morbid obesity (69.0 vs 73.0 years, p .026) with no difference in gender, active or healed ulcer classification (CEAP C5/6), or ulcer sidedness. We found no difference in the proportion of patients with morbid obesity with superficial venous incompetence on ultrasound (72.4% vs 79.7%, p.423). Patients with morbid obesity were equally as likely to undergo ultrasound investigation (73.2% vs 75.8%, p.748).
Conclusions: In patients with VLU there appeared no difference in the proportion of patients with morbid obesity with superficial venous incompetence. Directed studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of intervention in this patient population.