Ahmed Naguy, Reda Rushdy, Saxby Pridmore, Anubhuti Singh, Bibi Alamiri
Early-onset schizophrenia is notorious for poor prognostication and treatment-refractoriness. Clozapine remains a viable option, albeit off-label, but is clearly underutilized in this population. Use is typically fraught with panoply of drastic side effects. Here, authors report on an adolescent case with schizophrenia that responded ultimately to clozapine. Add-on viloxazine was advantageous spanning different symptom domains, mitigating metabolic parameters and addressing clozapine-sialorrhea. This might open new venues for such complicated, yet commonplace, clinical scenarios.
{"title":"Successful Add-on Viloxazine to Clozapine-Responsive Schizophrenia Mitigated Cognitive, Negative and Metabolic Domains.","authors":"Ahmed Naguy, Reda Rushdy, Saxby Pridmore, Anubhuti Singh, Bibi Alamiri","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early-onset schizophrenia is notorious for poor prognostication and treatment-refractoriness. Clozapine remains a viable option, albeit off-label, but is clearly underutilized in this population. Use is typically fraught with panoply of drastic side effects. Here, authors report on an adolescent case with schizophrenia that responded ultimately to clozapine. Add-on viloxazine was advantageous spanning different symptom domains, mitigating metabolic parameters and addressing clozapine-sialorrhea. This might open new venues for such complicated, yet commonplace, clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"52 1","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8896751/pdf/PB-52-1-57.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10772229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a primary cause of disability in adults, affecting daily functioning and decreasing quality of life. The focus on the role of nutraceuticals as adjunctive treatments to improve antidepressant response is paying growing interest. The study aims to compare the antidepressants response in the utilization of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus a combination of SSRIs and nutraceutical supplements based on S-Adenosyl methionine (SAMe), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and folate in terms of efficacy and tolerability.
Methods: A case-control study was carried out between March 2018 and September 2019. Cases and controls were evaluated through the following scales: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS); Clinical Global Impression (CGI); Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I); Antidepressant Adverse Events checklist (AES).
Results: A significant difference between the two groups of patients emerged at T1 in the HADS-A (p = 0.004) score and in the CGI score (p = 0.01), due to a major improvement in patients with a nutraceutical co-prescription. At T3 a significant statistical difference emerged, showing a greater improvement at HADS-D in the case group (p = 0.006), confirmed by a higher remission rate in patients taking a nutraceutical co-prescription. No differences in terms of adverse events emerged.
Conclusion: This study shows promising data about the role of nutraceuticals as adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder to improve SSRIs efficacy, with good tolerability. More data are needed to confirm these results, particularly about the role of nutraceuticals to decrease the latency of SSRIs response.
{"title":"Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Nutraceutical Combination in Major Depression Disorder: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Marta Ielmini, Ivano Caselli, Francesca Ceccon, Marcello Diurni, Nicola Poloni, Camilla Callegari","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a primary cause of disability in adults, affecting daily functioning and decreasing quality of life. The focus on the role of nutraceuticals as adjunctive treatments to improve antidepressant response is paying growing interest. The study aims to compare the antidepressants response in the utilization of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus a combination of SSRIs and nutraceutical supplements based on S-Adenosyl methionine (SAMe), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and folate in terms of efficacy and tolerability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was carried out between March 2018 and September 2019. Cases and controls were evaluated through the following scales: Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS); Clinical Global Impression (CGI); Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I); Antidepressant Adverse Events checklist (AES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference between the two groups of patients emerged at T<sub>1</sub> in the HADS-A (p = 0.004) score and in the CGI score (p = 0.01), due to a major improvement in patients with a nutraceutical co-prescription. At T<sub>3</sub> a significant statistical difference emerged, showing a greater improvement at HADS-D in the case group (p = 0.006), confirmed by a higher remission rate in patients taking a nutraceutical co-prescription. No differences in terms of adverse events emerged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows promising data about the role of nutraceuticals as adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder to improve SSRIs efficacy, with good tolerability. More data are needed to confirm these results, particularly about the role of nutraceuticals to decrease the latency of SSRIs response.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601758/pdf/PB-51-4-31.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39572522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M S Zastrozhin, A V Efimova, VYu Skryabin, V V Smirnov, A E Petukhov, E P Pankratenko, S A Pozdniakov, E V Kaverina, D A Klepikov, E A Grishina, K A Ryzhikova, I V Bure, E A Bryun, D A Sychev
Introduction: Phenazepam is commonly administered to patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Some proportion of such patients do not show adequate response to treatment regimen containing phenazepam, whereas many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Previous studies showed that CYP2D6 IS involved in the biotransformation of phenazepam, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of 1846G>A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from major depressive disorder.
Material and methods: The study enrolled 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (age -40.0 ± 16.3 years). Treatment regimen included phenazepam in an average daily dose of 6.0 ± 2.3 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the validated psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). The activity of CYP2D6 was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6M-THBC/pinoline). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS.
Results: Our findings didn't reveal the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 6.0 [4.0; 8.0] and (GA) 6.0 [5.0; 7.8], p > 0.999; the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] and (GA) 3.0 [3.0; 3.0], p > 0.999. We didn't reveal a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.812 [0.558; 1.348] and (GA) 0.931 [0.630; 1.271], p = 0.645). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 22.5 [16.9; 29.8], (GA) 22.7 [15.7; 31.5], p = 0.695. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.01, p = 0.866. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.07, p = 0.348. Also we did not reveal the relationship between the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma conc
苯那西泮通常用于诊断为重度抑郁症的患者。部分患者对含非那西泮的治疗方案反应不充分,而其中许多患者出现A型药物不良反应。先前的研究表明,CYP2D6参与了非那西泮的生物转化,其活性高度依赖于编码其基因的多态性。目标。本研究的目的是评估CYP2D6基因1846G>A多态性对苯那西泮浓度/剂量指标的影响,通过测量CYP2D6酶活性(通过6M-THBC/pinoline比值测量)和通过测量重度抑郁症患者hsa-miR-370-3p血浆浓度水平获得CYP2D6表达水平。材料与方法:191例复发性抑郁症患者(年龄-40.0±16.3岁)。治疗方案包括非那西泮,平均日剂量为6.0±2.3 mg / d。采用经验证的心理测量量表评估治疗效果。使用UKU副作用评定量表评估治疗安全性。为了进行基因分型和估计microRNA (miRNA)血浆水平,我们进行了实时聚合酶链反应(PCR real-time)。采用HPLC-MS/MS法测定同工酶的内源性底物及其代谢产物(6M-THBC/pinoline)的含量,评价CYP2D6活性。采用HPLC-MS/MS进行治疗药物监测。结果:我们的研究结果在治疗疗效评价(治疗结束时HAMA评分)方面没有统计学意义:(GG) 6.0 [4.0;(GA) 6.0 [5.0;7.8], p > 0.999;无统计学意义(UKU评分):(GG) 3.0 [2.0;(GA) 3.0 [3.0;3.0], p > 0.999。非那西泮在不同基因型患者中的浓度/剂量指标(GG)为0.812 [0.558;1.348]和(GA) 0.931 [0.630;1.271], p = 0.645)。本研究药物转录组学部分结果分析显示,不同基因型患者血浆hsa-miR-370-3p水平差异无统计学意义:(GG) 22.5 [16.9;29.8], (ga) 22.7 [15.7;[31.5], p = 0.695。同时,相关分析显示,以HAMA量表评分变化评价的非那西泮疗效谱与hsa-miR-370-3p血药浓度无统计学意义:rs = -0.01, p = 0.866。此外,我们没有揭示miRNA浓度与安全性之间的相关性:rs = 0.07, p = 0.348。此外,我们没有揭示CYP2D6酶活性(通过6M-THBC/pinoline比值测量评估)与hsa-miR-370-3p血浆浓度之间的关系:rs = -0.14, p = 0.056。同时,经相关分析,非那西泮浓度与hsa-miR-370-3p血药浓度无统计学意义:rs = -0.05, p = 0.468。结论:在191例复发性抑郁症患者中,CYP2D6基因多态性对苯那西泮的疗效和安全性的影响尚未得到证实。同时,hsa-miR-370-3p并不仍然是评估CYP2D6表达水平的有希望的生物标志物,因为它与编码的同工酶活性无关。
{"title":"Influence of Plasma Concentration of Hsa-Mir-370-3p and Cyp2d6*4 On Equilibrium Concentration of Phenazepam in Patients with Recurrent Depressive Disorder.","authors":"M S Zastrozhin, A V Efimova, VYu Skryabin, V V Smirnov, A E Petukhov, E P Pankratenko, S A Pozdniakov, E V Kaverina, D A Klepikov, E A Grishina, K A Ryzhikova, I V Bure, E A Bryun, D A Sychev","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Phenazepam is commonly administered to patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder. Some proportion of such patients do not show adequate response to treatment regimen containing phenazepam, whereas many of them experience type A adverse drug reactions. Previous studies showed that CYP2D6 IS involved in the biotransformation of phenazepam, the activity of which is highly dependent on the polymorphism of the gene encoding it. Objective. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of 1846G>A polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene on the concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam, using findings on enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 (as evaluated by the 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and on CYP2D6 expression level obtained by measuring the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration levels in patients suffering from major depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study enrolled 191 patients with recurrent depressive disorder (age -40.0 ± 16.3 years). Treatment regimen included phenazepam in an average daily dose of 6.0 ± 2.3 mg per day. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the validated psychometric scales. Therapy safety was assessed using the UKU Side-Effect Rating Scale. For genotyping and estimation of the microRNA (miRNA) plasma levels we performed the real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR Real-time). The activity of CYP2D6 was evaluated using the HPLC-MS/MS method by the content of the endogenous substrate of given isoenzyme and its metabolite in urine (6M-THBC/pinoline). Therapeutic drug monitoring has been performed using HPLC-MS/MS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings didn't reveal the statistically significant results in terms of the treatment efficacy evaluation (HAMA scores at the end of the treatment course): (GG) 6.0 [4.0; 8.0] and (GA) 6.0 [5.0; 7.8], p > 0.999; the statistical significance in the safety profile was not obtained (the UKU scores): (GG) 3.0 [2.0; 4.0] and (GA) 3.0 [3.0; 3.0], p > 0.999. We didn't reveal a statistical significance for concentration/dose indicator of phenazepam in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 0.812 [0.558; 1.348] and (GA) 0.931 [0.630; 1.271], p = 0.645). Analysis of the results of the pharmacotranscriptomic part of the study didn't show the statistically significant difference in the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma levels in patients with different genotypes: (GG) 22.5 [16.9; 29.8], (GA) 22.7 [15.7; 31.5], p = 0.695. At the same time, correlation analysis didn't reveal a statistically significant relationship between the phenazepam efficacy profile evaluated by changes in HAMA scale scores and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma concentration: rs = -0.01, p = 0.866. Also, we didn't reveal the correlation between the miRNA concentration and safety profile: rs = 0.07, p = 0.348. Also we did not reveal the relationship between the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity (as evaluated by 6M-THBC/pinoline ratio measurement) and the hsa-miR-370-3p plasma conc","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"87-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601761/pdf/PB-51-4-87.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39587097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antonio Siniscalchi, Scott Mintzer, Giovambattista De Sarro, Luca Gallelli
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used in various pathologies such as including epilepsy, migraine, neuropathic pain, etc. They can improve symptoms but cause adverse events (ADRs). Case reports have reported that one rare but serious AED-induced adverse reaction that has appeared in case reports is myotoxicity from rhabdomyolysis. Rhabdomyolysis can be induced by a therapeutically dosed occur with therapeutic doses of antiepileptic drugs and is in most cases reversible, although rarely it can cause serious complications. Clinical manifestations of rhabdomyolysis range from a single isolated asymptomatic rise in serum CK levels to severe electrolyte imbalances, cardiac arrhythmia, acute and disseminated renal failure, intravascular coagulation, and other symptoms. Many clinical cases reported that both conventional older and newer AEDs, as well as propofol, can cause rhabdomyolysis, even if there are no conclusive data. It has recently been shown that genetic factors certainly contribute to adverse reactions of antiepileptic drugs. A study of genetic polymorphism in patients with AED-induced rhabdomyolysis may be useful to explain the rarity of this adverse event and to improve the treatment of these AED patients, in terms of AED type and dose adjustment.
{"title":"Myotoxicity Induced by Antiepileptic Drugs: Could be a Rare but Serious Adverse Event?","authors":"Antonio Siniscalchi, Scott Mintzer, Giovambattista De Sarro, Luca Gallelli","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used in various pathologies such as including epilepsy, migraine, neuropathic pain, etc. They can improve symptoms but cause adverse events (ADRs). Case reports have reported that one rare but serious AED-induced adverse reaction that has appeared in case reports is myotoxicity from rhabdomyolysis. Rhabdomyolysis can be induced by a therapeutically dosed occur with therapeutic doses of antiepileptic drugs and is in most cases reversible, although rarely it can cause serious complications. Clinical manifestations of rhabdomyolysis range from a single isolated asymptomatic rise in serum CK levels to severe electrolyte imbalances, cardiac arrhythmia, acute and disseminated renal failure, intravascular coagulation, and other symptoms. Many clinical cases reported that both conventional older and newer AEDs, as well as propofol, can cause rhabdomyolysis, even if there are no conclusive data. It has recently been shown that genetic factors certainly contribute to adverse reactions of antiepileptic drugs. A study of genetic polymorphism in patients with AED-induced rhabdomyolysis may be useful to explain the rarity of this adverse event and to improve the treatment of these AED patients, in terms of AED type and dose adjustment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"105-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601760/pdf/PB-51-4-105.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39587098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jisha M Lucca, Fatima M Al-Turaifi, Al-Mubayedh Safyah, Feras A Hamad Al-Awad
Objectives: Clozapine is considered as effective medication for treatment resistant schizophrenia. Due to its potential severe adverse effects' clozapine is underused in the clinical settings. Information's on clinical use and monitoring of clozapine is lacking in middle east. This research analysis clozapine prescription and monitoring patterns a in a university teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia.
Experimental design: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the psychiatric department of a university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Patients on treatment with clozapine for minimum one year were reviewed and assessed for clozapine mandatory and non-mandatory requirements and its correlated factors.
Observation: Majority of patients were male [(n = 36) 63%] and the average age of was 36.8 ± 12.3. TRS schizophrenia[(n = 49),85%] was the common indications. Prior to initiation of clozapine all recommended guidelines was followed for all patients (100%). In addition to the blood monitoring and vitals LFT (80.75%) and weight (87.77%) were frequently measured. Hematological work up performed routinely throughout initial 18 weeks (71.9 %) and every month (59.6%). Weight gain (29.8%) was the most documented adverse effects.
Conclusion: The current study explored experiences with clozapine prescribing practices in a university hospital KSA and suggest that clozapine prescription is completely adhered with already existing guidelines in terms of dosing and monitoring. There exist a careful balance of benefit and risk in term of adverse reaction of clozapine in the local population.
{"title":"A Comprehensive Monitoring of Clozapine and Related Components in Clinical Practices. Saudi Arabian Scenario.","authors":"Jisha M Lucca, Fatima M Al-Turaifi, Al-Mubayedh Safyah, Feras A Hamad Al-Awad","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clozapine is considered as effective medication for treatment resistant schizophrenia. Due to its potential severe adverse effects' clozapine is underused in the clinical settings. Information's on clinical use and monitoring of clozapine is lacking in middle east. This research analysis clozapine prescription and monitoring patterns a in a university teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted in the psychiatric department of a university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Patients on treatment with clozapine for minimum one year were reviewed and assessed for clozapine mandatory and non-mandatory requirements and its correlated factors.</p><p><strong>Observation: </strong>Majority of patients were male [(n = 36) 63%] and the average age of was 36.8 ± 12.3. TRS schizophrenia[(n = 49),85%] was the common indications. Prior to initiation of clozapine all recommended guidelines was followed for all patients (100%). In addition to the blood monitoring and vitals LFT (80.75%) and weight (87.77%) were frequently measured. Hematological work up performed routinely throughout initial 18 weeks (71.9 %) and every month (59.6%). Weight gain (29.8%) was the most documented adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study explored experiences with clozapine prescribing practices in a university hospital KSA and suggest that clozapine prescription is completely adhered with already existing guidelines in terms of dosing and monitoring. There exist a careful balance of benefit and risk in term of adverse reaction of clozapine in the local population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"40-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601762/pdf/PB-51-4-40.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39572523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs, also known as antipsychotics) are frequently used in hospitalized patients. These medications carry a significant side effect burden and should be used judiciously. This purpose of this study is to examine patient, disease, and medication characteristics associated with the use of DRBAs in the inpatient setting to better understand current prescribing patterns and opportunities for optimization. A retrospective analysis was performed of 17,224 patients with at least one inpatient DRBA order placed between 1/1/2018-12/31/2019. The study population at this community hospital network in the United States contained those with (71.0%) and without (29.0%) psychiatric diagnoses, and the mean number of DRBA medications for each patient was 2.4 +/- 1.1. The characteristics of single, male, government-sponsored health insurance, movement disorder, DRBA adverse effects, and medication non-adherence were associated with significantly greater mean total DRBA medications prescribed. Medication non-adherence and prescription of a long-acting injectable (LAI) DRBA were greater in single and male patients, while suicidality was more likely in those with a movement disorder or DRBA adverse effect. Specific agents were also significantly associated with cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorder diagnoses. Based on the findings of this study, several patient, disease, and medication factors are related to the use of DRBAs in the hospital setting. It is important to further explore these associations in order to determine the appropriateness of DRBA prescribing and identify areas for improvement.
{"title":"Characteristics of Inpatients Prescribed Dopamine Receptor Blocking Agents.","authors":"Shaina Schwartz, Lauren Dinkla, Jocelyn Pullen, Rachel Bernard, Archana Kumar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dopamine receptor blocking agents (DRBAs, also known as antipsychotics) are frequently used in hospitalized patients. These medications carry a significant side effect burden and should be used judiciously. This purpose of this study is to examine patient, disease, and medication characteristics associated with the use of DRBAs in the inpatient setting to better understand current prescribing patterns and opportunities for optimization. A retrospective analysis was performed of 17,224 patients with at least one inpatient DRBA order placed between 1/1/2018-12/31/2019. The study population at this community hospital network in the United States contained those with (71.0%) and without (29.0%) psychiatric diagnoses, and the mean number of DRBA medications for each patient was 2.4 +/- 1.1. The characteristics of single, male, government-sponsored health insurance, movement disorder, DRBA adverse effects, and medication non-adherence were associated with significantly greater mean total DRBA medications prescribed. Medication non-adherence and prescription of a long-acting injectable (LAI) DRBA were greater in single and male patients, while suicidality was more likely in those with a movement disorder or DRBA adverse effect. Specific agents were also significantly associated with cardiovascular disease and metabolic disorder diagnoses. Based on the findings of this study, several patient, disease, and medication factors are related to the use of DRBAs in the hospital setting. It is important to further explore these associations in order to determine the appropriateness of DRBA prescribing and identify areas for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"51-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601763/pdf/PB-51-4-51.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39572524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M B Deepak, Kalra Deeksha, Rajhans Pallavi, Choudhary Hemant, Bajaj Nidhisha, Deep Raman
Clozapine is a second generation antipsychotic agent which is drug of choice for treatment resistant schizophrenia. Tachycardia and postural hypotension are most frequently observed cardiovascular adverse effects, but reports on new-onset persistently elevated blood pressure are sparse. Mechanisms underlying clozapine induced hypertension also remain unclear. We report the case of a 32 year old normotensive male with persistently elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure after clozapine initiation. Hypertension persisted throughout the phase of dose optimization and dose stabilization at 300 mg/day, requiring an addition of a beta blocker (atenolol) after a month of observation. The 24 hour urinary catecholamines were within normal limits. Autonomic function tests revealed severe loss of parasympathetic activity and cardiac autonomic tone. The case adds to limited information on autonomic dysfunction as a potential factor in clozapine induced hypertension.
{"title":"Clozapine Induced Hypertension and its Association with Autonomic Dysfunction.","authors":"M B Deepak, Kalra Deeksha, Rajhans Pallavi, Choudhary Hemant, Bajaj Nidhisha, Deep Raman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clozapine is a second generation antipsychotic agent which is drug of choice for treatment resistant schizophrenia. Tachycardia and postural hypotension are most frequently observed cardiovascular adverse effects, but reports on new-onset persistently elevated blood pressure are sparse. Mechanisms underlying clozapine induced hypertension also remain unclear. We report the case of a 32 year old normotensive male with persistently elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure after clozapine initiation. Hypertension persisted throughout the phase of dose optimization and dose stabilization at 300 mg/day, requiring an addition of a beta blocker (atenolol) after a month of observation. The 24 hour urinary catecholamines were within normal limits. Autonomic function tests revealed severe loss of parasympathetic activity and cardiac autonomic tone. The case adds to limited information on autonomic dysfunction as a potential factor in clozapine induced hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"122-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601757/pdf/PB-51-4-122.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39587100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jess G Fiedorowicz, Lisa Brown, James Li, Sagar V Parikh, Boadie W Dunlop, Brent P Forester, Richard C Shelton, Michael E Thase, Matthew Macaluso, Kunbo Yu, John F Greden
Weight gain is a common side-effect of medications used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). We sought to estimate the frequency of weight gain for obesogenic medications prescribed for MDD and to evaluate if bupropion mitigated risk for weight gain. We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with weight available at baseline and 12 weeks (n = 1,032) or 24 weeks (n = 871) in a post hoc analysis of the Genomics Used to Improve DEpression Decisions (GUIDED) study of patients with MDD who failed at least one medication trial. We compared weight gain between those on versus not on medications with high risk for weight gain, including a subgroup receiving combination treatment with bupropion. A second analysis evaluated weight gain across traditional medication classes, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Those on medications identified as high risk for weight gain were significantly more likely to experience clinically significant weight gain (≥3%) at 12 weeks (29.3% vs. 16.3%, p < .001) and 24 weeks (33.5% vs. 23.5%, p = .015). No protection from clinically significant weight gain was observed among patients treated with a high-risk medication concomitantly with bupropion (N = 31, 35% and 52% with clinically significant weight gain at 12 and 24 weeks). Antipsychotic medications and tricyclic antidepressants were most often associated with clinically significant weight gain. This study helps quantify the real-world risk of weight gain for patients with MDD on medications with high risk for weight gain, especially for patients taking antipsychotics. Concurrent treatment with bupropion does not appear to mitigate the weight gain risk.
体重增加是用于治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的药物的常见副作用。我们试图估计服用致肥药物治疗重度抑郁症患者体重增加的频率,并评估安非他酮是否能减轻体重增加的风险。我们分析了在基线和12周(n = 1032)或24周(n = 871)时体重可用的患者的前瞻性队列,对至少一次药物试验失败的MDD患者进行了基因组学用于改善抑郁决策(引导)研究的后分析。我们比较了体重增加高风险药物治疗组和未治疗组的体重增加情况,包括接受安非他酮联合治疗的亚组。第二项分析评估了传统药物类别的体重增加情况,调整了潜在的混杂变量。在12周(29.3% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001)和24周(33.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.015)时,那些被确定为体重增加高风险药物的患者更有可能出现临床显著的体重增加(≥3%)。在高危药物同时使用安非他酮治疗的患者中,没有观察到对临床显著体重增加的保护作用(N = 31、35%和52%在12周和24周时出现临床显著体重增加)。抗精神病药物和三环类抗抑郁药物通常与临床显著的体重增加有关。这项研究有助于量化MDD患者在实际生活中体重增加的风险,尤其是服用抗精神病药物的患者。同时服用安非他酮并不能减轻体重增加的风险。
{"title":"Obesogenic Medications and Weight Gain Over 24 Weeks in Patients with Depression: Results from the GUIDED Study.","authors":"Jess G Fiedorowicz, Lisa Brown, James Li, Sagar V Parikh, Boadie W Dunlop, Brent P Forester, Richard C Shelton, Michael E Thase, Matthew Macaluso, Kunbo Yu, John F Greden","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weight gain is a common side-effect of medications used to treat major depressive disorder (MDD). We sought to estimate the frequency of weight gain for obesogenic medications prescribed for MDD and to evaluate if bupropion mitigated risk for weight gain. We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with weight available at baseline and 12 weeks (n = 1,032) or 24 weeks (n = 871) in a post hoc analysis of the <b>G</b>enomics <b>U</b>sed to <b>I</b>mprove <b>DE</b>pression <b>D</b>ecisions (GUIDED) study of patients with MDD who failed at least one medication trial. We compared weight gain between those on versus not on medications with high risk for weight gain, including a subgroup receiving combination treatment with bupropion. A second analysis evaluated weight gain across traditional medication classes, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Those on medications identified as high risk for weight gain were significantly more likely to experience clinically significant weight gain (≥3%) at 12 weeks (29.3% vs. 16.3%, <i>p</i> < .001) and 24 weeks (33.5% vs. 23.5%, <i>p</i> = .015). No protection from clinically significant weight gain was observed among patients treated with a high-risk medication concomitantly with bupropion (N = 31, 35% and 52% with clinically significant weight gain at 12 and 24 weeks). Antipsychotic medications and tricyclic antidepressants were most often associated with clinically significant weight gain. This study helps quantify the real-world risk of weight gain for patients with MDD on medications with high risk for weight gain, especially for patients taking antipsychotics. Concurrent treatment with bupropion does not appear to mitigate the weight gain risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"8-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601756/pdf/PB-51-4-8.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39572521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The organism's energy requirements for homeostatic balance are covered by the redox mechanisms. Yet in case of psychologically traumatic stress, allostatic regulations activate both pro-oxidant and antioxidant molecules as well as respective components of the inflammatory system. Thus a new setpoint of dynamic interactions among redox elements is reached. Similarly, a multifaceted interplay between redox and inflammatory fields is activated with the mediation of major effector systems such as the immune system, Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, kynurenine, and the glycaemic regulatory one. In case of sustained and/or intense traumatic stress the prophylactic antioxidant components are inadequate to provide the organism with neuroprotection finally culminating in Oxidative Stress and subsequently to cellular apoptosis. In parallel multiple inflammatory systems trigger and/or are triggered by the redox systems in tight fashion so that the causation sequence appears obscure. This exhaustive review aims at the comprehension of the interaction among components of the redox system as well as to the collection of disperse findings relative to the redox-inflammatory interplay in the context of traumatic stress so that new research strategies could be developed.
{"title":"Psychologically Traumatic Oxidative Stress; A Comprehensive Review of Redox Mechanisms and Related Inflammatory Implications.","authors":"Evangelos Karanikas","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The organism's energy requirements for homeostatic balance are covered by the redox mechanisms. Yet in case of psychologically traumatic stress, allostatic regulations activate both pro-oxidant and antioxidant molecules as well as respective components of the inflammatory system. Thus a new setpoint of dynamic interactions among redox elements is reached. Similarly, a multifaceted interplay between redox and inflammatory fields is activated with the mediation of major effector systems such as the immune system, Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis, kynurenine, and the glycaemic regulatory one. In case of sustained and/or intense traumatic stress the prophylactic antioxidant components are inadequate to provide the organism with neuroprotection finally culminating in Oxidative Stress and subsequently to cellular apoptosis. In parallel multiple inflammatory systems trigger and/or are triggered by the redox systems in tight fashion so that the causation sequence appears obscure. This exhaustive review aims at the comprehension of the interaction among components of the redox system as well as to the collection of disperse findings relative to the redox-inflammatory interplay in the context of traumatic stress so that new research strategies could be developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"51 4","pages":"65-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8601764/pdf/PB-51-4-65.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39587096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}