Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology最新文献

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess causes and predictors of death among Finnish patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Method: Medical records of patients registered with the ICD-10 code M34 from 1996 to 2018 in two university hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical data were collected until the end of 2020. Death certificates were obtained from Statistics Finland up to August 2021. Using death certificates and patient records, the cause of death for each patient was determined. The mean age at death, median time from SSc diagnosis, and factors predicting death were analysed.

Results: Among 313 SSc patients, 91 deaths occurred between April 2000 and September 2020. Overall 5 and 10 year survival rates were 88.4% and 80.2%, respectively. SSc was the most common primary cause of death (n = 35) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) was the most common SSc-related cause of death (n = 13). Moreover, 52% of the patients with diffuse SSc and 33% of those with limited cutaneous SSc died as a result of SSc itself. Patients who died because of SSc were significantly younger [mean ± sd age 65.6 ± 12.7 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 61.2-70.1] than those who died from other causes (74.2 ± 9.6 years, 95% CI 71.5-76.9) (p = 0.0006). ILD, pulmonary arterial hypertension, gastrointestinal involvement, male gender, and older age at disease onset predicted death.

Conclusion: The disease itself was the major cause of death among Finnish SSc patients, in both diffuse and limited forms of SSc.

Objective: There is a lack of knowledge concerning the validity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses used in epidemiological studies on rheumatic diseases. This paper seeks to verify register-derived ILD diagnoses using chest computed tomography (CT) and medical records as a gold standard.

Method: The Norwegian Anti-Rheumatic Drug Register (NOR-DMARD) is a multicentre prospective observational study of patients with inflammatory arthritis who start treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. NOR-DMARD is linked to the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Cause of Death Registry. We searched registers for ILD coded by ICD-10 J84 or J99 among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis. We extracted chest CT reports and medical records from participating hospitals. Two expert thoracic radiologists scored examinations to confirm the ILD diagnosis. We also searched medical records to find justifications for the diagnosis following multidisciplinary evaluations. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) for ILD across subsets.

Results: We identified 71 cases with an ILD diagnosis. CT examinations were available in 65/71 patients (91.5%), of whom ILD was confirmed on CT in 29/65 (44.6%). In a further 10 patients, medical records confirmed the diagnosis, giving a total of 39/71 verified cases. The PPV of a register-derived ILD diagnosis was thus 54.9%. In a subset of patients who had received an ILD code at two or more time-points and had a CT scan taken within a relevant period, the PPV was 72.2%.

Conclusion: The validity of register-based diagnoses of ILD must be carefully considered in epidemiological studies.

Objective: In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) are recommended for use in treat-to-target (T2T) strategies. However, BASDAI disease states may be a less suitable T2T instrument than ASDAS, since BASDAI contains non-disease activity related items. The objective of our study was to investigate the construct validity of BASDAI and ASDAS disease states.

Method: We performed a single-centre cross-sectional study on BASDAI and ASDAS construct validity in long-term BASDAI T2T-treated axSpA patients. Our hypothesis was that BASDAI is less representative of disease activity than ASDAS owing to the focus on pain and fatigue, and missing an objective item, e.g. C-reactive protein (CRP). This was operationalized using several subhypotheses.

Results: The study included 242 axSpA patients. BASDAI and ASDAS disease states showed a similar relation to Patient Acceptable Symptom State and T2T protocol adherence. The proportions of patients with high BASDAI and ASDAS disease activity fulfilling Central Sensitization Inventory and fibromyalgia syndrome criteria were similar. The correlation with fatigue was moderate for both BASDAI (Spearman's rho 0.64) and ASDAS (Spearman's rho 0.54) disease states. A high ASDAS was strongly correlated with increased CRP (relative risk 6.02, 95% CI 3.0-12.09), while this correlation was not seen for BASDAI (relative risk 1.13, 95% CI 0.74-1.74).

Conclusion: Our study showed moderate and comparable construct validity for BASDAI- and ASDAS-based disease activity states, with the expected exception of association with CRP. Therefore, no strong preference can be given for either measure, although the ASDAS seems marginally more valid.

Objective: To investigate the effects of methotrexate (MTX) and the tumour necrosis factor inhibitor infliximab (IFX) on immune cells derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) of inflammatory arthritis patients.

Method: Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-induced proliferation of healthy donors' PBMCs and synovial intermediate monocytes (CD14⁺CD16⁺ cells) in SFMCs derived from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was determined by flow cytometry following co-culture with IFX and MTX. PHA-induced interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production in PBMCs was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The drugs' effect on mRNA expression in SFMCs was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results: The combination of IFX 10 μg/mL + MTX 0.1 μg/mL had the strongest inhibitory effect on PBMC proliferation (91%), followed by MTX 0.1 μg/mL (86%) and IFX 10 μg/mL (49%). In PHA-stimulated PBMCs, IFN-γ production was reduced by IFX 10 μg/mL, MTX 0.1 μg/mL, and IFX 10 μg/mL + MTX 0.1 μg/mL by 68%, 90%, and 85%, respectively. In SFMCs, IFX 10 µg/mL significantly reduced CD14⁺CD16⁺ cells compared to medium (PsA 54%, p < 0.01; RA 46%, p < 0.05), while MTX had no effect on this population. IFX + MTX led to a similar suppression of CD14⁺CD16⁺ cells as achieved by IFX alone. The drugs had different impacts on SFMC gene expression.

Conclusion: Both IFX and MTX effectively inhibited PBMC proliferation and IFN-γ production, but only IFX reduced synovial monocytes and pro-inflammatory gene expression in SFMCs, suggesting a differential impact of IFX and MTX on critical inflammatory cell populations ex vivo.