Scandinavian Journal of Urology最新文献

June 7-10th, 2023 Bergen, Norway.

Background: Infection of the prostate gland following biopsy, usually with Escherichia coli, is a common complication, despite the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis. A fluoroquinolone (FQ) is commonly prescribed as prophylaxis. Worryingly, the rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) E. coli species has been shown to be increasing.

Objective: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with infection after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx).

Methods: This was a prospective study on patients undergoing TRUS-Bx in southeast Sweden. Prebiopsy rectal and urine cultures were obtained, and antimicrobial susceptibility and risk-group stratification were determined. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for post-biopsy urinary tract infection (UTI) and FQ-R E. coli in the rectal flora.

Results: In all, 283 patients were included, of whom 18 (6.4%) developed post-TRUS-Bx UTIs. Of these, 10 (3.5%) had an UTI without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and 8 (2.8%) had a UTI with SIRS. Being in the medium- or high-risk groups of infectious complications was not an independent risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx, but low-level FQ-resistance (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC): 0.125-0.25 mg/L) or FQ-resistance (MIC > 0.5 mg/L) among E. coli in the faecal flora was. Risk for SIRS increased in parallel with increasing degrees of FQ-resistance. Significant risk factor for harbouring FQ-R E.coli was travelling outside Europe within the previous 12 months.

Conclusion: The predominant risk factor for UTI with SIRS after TRUS-Bx was FQ-R E. coli among the faecal flora. The difficulty in identifying this type of risk factor demonstrates a need for studies on the development of a general approach either with rectal swab culture for targeted prophylaxis, or prior rectal preparation with a bactericidal agent such as povidone-iodine before TRUS-Bx to reduce the risk of FQ-R E. coli-related infection.

Editorial comment to Urosymphyseal fistula after pelvic radiotherapy - an entity in patients with significant comorbidity requiring multidisciplinary management Scand J Urol. 2023.

Problem: A low α/β ratio for prostate cancer (PCa) compared to surrounding normal tissue theoretically implies therapeutical advantages with hypofractionated treatment. Data from large randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing moderate hypofractionated (MHRT, 2.4-3.4 Gray/fraction (Gy/fx)) and ultra-hypofractionated (UHRT, >5 Gy/fx) with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT, 1.8-2 Gy/fx) and the possible clinical implications have been reviewed.

Materials and method: We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus for RCT comparing MHRT/UHRT with CFRT treatment of locally and/or locally advanced (N0M0) PCa. We found six RCTs, which compared different radiation therapy regimes. Tumour control and acute and late toxicities are reported.

Results: MHRT was non-inferior to CFRT for intermediate-risk PCa, non-inferior for low-risk PCa and not superior in terms of tumour control for high-risk PCa. Acute toxicity rates were increased compared to CFRT, especially an increase in acute gastrointestinal adverse effects was seen. Late toxicity related to MHRT seems to be comparable. UHRT was non-inferior in terms of tumour control in one RCT, with increased acute toxicity, but with comparable late toxicity. One trial, however, indicated increased late toxicity rates with UHRT.

Discussion and conclusion: MHRT delivers similar therapeutic outcomes compared to CFRT in terms of tumour control and late toxicity for intermediate-risk PCa patients. Slightly more acute transient toxicity could be tolerated in favour of a shorter treatment course. UHRT should be regarded as an optional treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease applied at experienced centres in concordance with international and national guidelines.

Objective: Radical prostatectomy reduces mortality among patients with localized prostate cancer, however up to 35% of patients will experience biochemical recurrence, often treated with salvage radiotherapy. The objective of the study was to investigate long-term effects of salvage radiotherapy.

Methods: A prospective, controlled, non-randomized trial at 14 Swedish center's including 4,003 patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy 2008-2011. A target trial emulation approach was used to identify eligible patients that was treated with salvage radiotherapy. The control group received no salvage radiotherapy. Outcomes were assessed by patient questionnaires on ordinal scales and statistical group comparisons were made using ordered logit regression with adjustment for baseline outcome and confounding factors. The primary endpoints were bowel, urinary and sexual function and bothering due to dysfunction at 8 years.

Results: Eleven percent (330/3,139) of the analyzed study population received salvage radiotherapy. Fecal leakage, leakage of mucus and hematochezia were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy compared with the control group; 4.5% versus 2.6% odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): (1.90 [1.38; 2.62]), 6.8% versus 1.5% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76) and 8.6% versus 1.2% 4.14 (2.98; 5.76), respectively. Urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and hematuria were more common after receiving salvage radiotherapy, 34% versus 23% 2.23 (2.65; 3.00), 65% versus 57% 1.65 (1.18; 2.29) and 16% versus 1.6% 11.17 (5.68; 21.99), respectively.

Conclusion: Salvage radiotherapy was associated with increased risk for fecal leakage, hematochezia, urinary incontinence and hematuria. Our results emphasize the importance of selecting patients for salvage radiotherapy to avoid overtreatment and to give high quality pre-treatment information to ensure patients' preparedness for late side-effects.

Objective: To report population-based clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with urosymphyseal fistula (USF) after pelvic radiotherapy (RT).

Patients and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed in 33 consecutive patients diagnosed with suspicion of USF in a tertial referral center from 2014-2022 to ascertain information about diagnostic delay, clinical presentation, precipitating causes, treatments received and outcomes during the median 22 months follow-up. Out of 33 consecutive patients with suspicion of USF, one female with vesicovaginal fistula, one patient developing RT-associated bladder angiosarcoma, four patients with short follow-up (<3 months), and three patients that during chart review not were considered to have a USF were excluded.

Results: In all, 24 males with a median age of 77 years were diagnosed with USF. Local pain was the predominating symptom in 17/24 (71%) patients. Endourologic manipulations preceded the diagnosis of USF in 16 patients. Five patients had a diagnostic delay of more than 3 months. At diagnosis, 20/24 patients had radiological signs of osteomyelitis, and five had a concomitant rectourethral fistula. Due to comorbidity, five patients were not amenable to any other interventions than urinary catheter or suprapubic tube in conjunction with long-term antibiotics, of which three died from infections related to the USF. Out of the remaining 19 patients receiving some form of urinary diversion, five had recurrent osteomyelitis, of which four did not undergo cystectomy in conjunction with surgery for the USF.

Conclusions: Urethral endourologic interventions in patients previously subjected to pelvic RT should be performed cautiously.