Seminars in oncology最新文献

According to the literature, skin metastases affect 0.7%–10.4% of patients with malignant neoplasms of internal organs and may be 1 presentation of systemic spread of the cancer. Skin metastases may be the first sign of relapse after treatment and about 30% of cases of skin metastases are diagnosed before the diagnosis of internal organ cancer. Cutaneous metastases most often come from breast cancer and melanoma. They can present synchronous or metachronous. Adequate vigilance, combined with knowledge of the clinical picture and epidemiology, can contribute to accurate diagnosis and treatment. Clinically, skin metastases occur in the form of atypical solitary, painless nodules, or tumors. Lumps or infiltrating foci do not show clinical features that help in making a diagnosis. Skin changes are more accessible during physical examination, and it is easier to do a biopsy and provide histological assessment. Dermoscopy, a useful initial tool for the assessment of skin metastases, can lead to a rapid accurate diagnosis and treatment. Ultimately, the diagnosis of a metastatic malignancy is confirmed by histopathological examination.

Equity in oncology clinical trial participation has been declared a global priority. Australia is a key stakeholder in the global clinical trials sphere and managed to maintain high clinical trial activity during the COVID pandemic. Despite these successes, there is paucity of understanding about what influences clinical trial participation in Australia. In the international context, systematic reviews have highlighted that sociodemographic barriers, access to health care, clinical trial inclusion criteria, and attitudes of physicians and patients are factors which influence oncology trial participation. Exploring the factors in Australian health services which influence trial participation is now of significant importance. The lack of clear evidence directly highlights a need to assess the factors that influence oncology trial participation in Australia. We call for review of existing data to identify future directions in Australia which will potentially give deeper insights for the international clinical trial community.

Individuals with germline E-cadherin (CDH1) mutations are at high risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer (GC) and prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) represents the only life-saving treatment. We reviewed all PTGs reported in literature associated with CDH1 germline mutations. A total of 224 PTGs were reported. The majority were described in the United States of America (50%), the Netherlands (17.8%), and Canada (12.5%). GC was identified in 85.4% of cases after PTG, with a high rate of “no cancer” at histopathology identified in the United States of America (19.6%). Considering the mutation type, a total of 61 different germline mutations was reported, primarily non-missense versus missense alterations (86.9% v 13.1%). Twenty-one PTGs were performed in individuals with no family history of GC, and tumor was detected in 33.3% of investigated cases; regarding individuals with a family history of GC, tumor was identified in 85% of cases. PTG remains the best treatment for individuals harboring germline CDH1 mutations and fulfilling specific clinical criteria; in other CDH1-associated conditions, PTG should be suggested, but not strongly recommended. Additional studies are required to assess the cancer risk in those conditions.

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with anticancer drugs are common and can significantly affect efficacy and toxicity of treatment. Therefore, a Dutch Multidisciplinary Expert group is assessing the clinical significance of DDIs in oncology and provides recommendations for the management of these DDIs. We present an overview of methodology and outcome of an evidence- and consensus-based assessment of DDIs between anticancer drugs and non-anticancer drugs.

A literature search was performed through PubMed and EMA and FDA assessment reports, to identify potential DDI's involving anticancer drugs. For each potential DDI a concept report for risk analysis and practical advice for management was created. Subsequently, this risk analysis and the corresponding advice were assessed and weighed.

A total of 290 potential DDIs have been identified in the literature thus far. Of these 290 potential DDIs, the Expert Group has identified 94 (32%) DDIs as clinically relevant, with a need for an automated alert and a suggested intervention. Furthermore, 110 DDIs have been identified as clinically not relevant. For 86 potential DDIs evidence supporting a relevant DDI was insufficient and in these cases neither an alert nor advice regarding a suggested intervention were formulated.

A transparent risk analysis is presented for identification of clinically relevant DDIs with anticancer drugs. Integration of DDI guidelines into the national electronic prescribing system is essential to achieve optimal efficacy and minimal toxicity in patients receiving anticancer therapy. A clear overview of clinically relevant DDIs with anticancer therapy provides clinicians with a structured, evidence-based and consensus-built tool for anticancer therapy surveillance.

Immune check point inhibitors (ICI) have secured regulatory approvals across the world for the treatment of various types of cancers. Though not as frequent as immune-related adverse events (AEs) involving other organs, a considerable number of ICI-related renal AE have also been reported and predicting such events has become important. We provide an updated review on possible mechanisms of ICI-related acute kidney injury (AKI), related risk factors, and the use of ICIs in patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD). A systematic search for related articles was conducted. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN) is known to be the main cause of ICI-related AKI, with glomerulonephritis also a significant cause. Factors including use of concurrent medications, extra-renal immune related AEs, and combination of two or more immunotherapy drugs are possible risk factors. Use of ICI in patients with CKD may be related to increased occurrence of overall immune related AEs. If the diagnosis of ICI related renal AEs is confirmed, prompt use of steroids is recommended, and in severe cases of AKI, discontinuation of ICI should be considered.

Purpose/Objectives

Radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) is a skin reaction limited to an area of prior radiation triggered by the subsequent introduction of systemic therapy. To characterize RRD, we conducted a literature search, summarized RRD features, and compared the most common drug classes implicated in this phenomenon.

Materials/Methods

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane DBSR databases were queried through July 1, 2019 using key words: radiation recall, RRD, and radiodermatitis (limited to humans and English language). Studies included case reports in which patients treated with radiotherapy were initiated on a new line of systemic therapy and subsequently developed a skin reaction in the irradiated area. RRD cases were organized by whether RRD occurred after a single drug or multiple drug administration.

Results

One-hundred fifteen studies representing 129 RRD cases (96 single-drug RRD, 33 multi-drug) were included. Sixty-three drugs were associated with RRD. Docetaxel (22) and gemcitabine (18) were the two drugs most commonly associated with RRD. Breast cancer (69 cases) was the most commonly associated tumor type. For single-drug RRD, the median radiotherapy dose was 45.0 Gy (range, 30.0–63.2 Gy). The median time from radiotherapy to drug exposure, time from drug exposure to RRD and time to significant improvement was 8 weeks (range, 2–132 weeks), 5 days (range, 2–56 days), and 14 days (range, 7–49 days), respectively. Variables significantly associated with grade ≥2 toxicity were docetaxel (P = 0.04) and non-antifolate antimetabolite (P = 0.05). The only variable significantly associated with grade ≥3 toxicity was capecitabine (P = 0.04).

Conclusions

RRD is a complex toxicity that can occur after a wide range of radiotherapy doses and many different systemic agents. Most commonly, it presents in patients diagnosed with breast cancer and after administration of a taxane or antimetabolite medication. RRD treatment generally consists of corticosteroids with consideration of antibiotics if superinfection is suspected. Drug re-challenge may be considered after RRD if the initial reaction was of mild intensity.

Introduction

Patients with cancer need to receive their proper treatment and often cannot wait for their treatment, despite delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, many cancer centers have had challenges maintaining their oncological activities.

Objectives

To compare the average hospital management data and indicators in two different periods, with and without the peak of COVID-19 cases, from an important tertiary cancer center in the northeast region of Brazil.

Methods

A retrospective and observational study was performed comparing average hospital administrative data and indicators, between January to March v April to June, 2020 exclusively at the Hospital de Câncer de Pernambuco, Brazil.

Results

There were on average a 13% reduction in the chemotherapy administered (P = .131), 17% fewer radiotherapy treatments carried out (P = .043) and 41% as many oncologic surgeries undertaken (P = .002). There was a reduction in the number of sessions of out-patient chemotherapy of 8•6% (P = .271) and chemotherapy inpatients of 33% (P = .038). Admission of new cases of patients with cancer was reduced by 44% (P = .007) during the period analyzed. Ambulatory appointments also decreased by 55% (P = .004) and emergency room appointments fell by 7•9% (P = .495). The number of hospitalizations was reduced by 36% (P = .005) and the occupancy rate decreased by 23•6% (P = .003), while the length of individual hospital stays (in days) increased 10•5% (P = .116).

Conclusion

We report a reduction in the number of radiotherapy treatments and surgeries performed cancer carried out, ambulatory and emergency appointments, hospitalization and admission of new cases of cancer during peak of COVID-19 in an important public tertiary cancer center in the northeast region of Brazil.

Background

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is used across many tumor types and settings. The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) is around 20%. Mortality is 0.5%-1%. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays a key role in fluoropyrimidine inactivation. Key DPYD mutations are linked to a high risk of SAEs. Pretreatment DPD screening was mandated by EMA guidelines in April 2020 and widely adopted thereafter. Uncertainty remains regarding optimal dosing practice.

Methods

We retrospectively examined records of all 23 patients with DPYD mutation who started chemotherapy between April and November 2020. Our center tests for the mutations considered clinically actionable by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and uses the Gene Activity Score (GAS) to guide dose reduction.

Results

Most patients started on a 50% dose. One started on 100% and experienced mild diarrhea after cycle 2; DPD was tested belatedly, subsequent cycles were reduced to 50% and he remained well. Three patients receiving chemo-radiotherapy started on 76% dose; 50% was felt to be subtherapeutic. One of them had no toxicities; another had grade 2 nausea and a hospital attendance with non-neutropenic fever; the third was admitted for 6 weeks with pancolitis. Seven patients did not have toxicities above grade 1 and no hospital attendances. Five patients had further dose reductions. None had dose escalation.

Conclusion

As our experience shows, patients with DPD deficiency are heterogeneous. Worryingly, SAEs occur despite dose reduction according to GAS. Others had minimal toxicity and may be under-dosed by GAS. There are clearly many factors at play other than the 4 DPYD variants. The DPD result must be available and inform first cycle dosing. Dose should be cautiously titrated up if tolerated; this was not done at our center due to clinician caution. Further research is needed to guide this. Patients should be reviewed frequently, counselled regarding their DPD status, and empowered to seek advice promptly when they feel unwell.