Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-23
Miriam Zuk
{"title":"Preventing Gentrification-Induced Displacement in the U.S.","authors":"Miriam Zuk","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134276491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Home Away From Home","authors":"A. Fermin, F. Wassenberg","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121930846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-24
R. Kleinhans
The Netherlands is internationally known for its relatively large social rented housing stock. Since the policy genesis of urban renewal (Stedelijke Vernieuwing) in 1997, urban restructuring has gained traction, especially in the early postwar neighborhoods. With demolition and new housing construction as key instruments of restructuring, the relocation of tenants has been a key topic in the scientific and policy debate about the implications of urban restructuring. The debate on neighborhood impacts of forced relocation has been inspired by a conceptual framework of gentrification, social mix, and social cohesion, whereas relocation outcomes for individual tenants have been mostly negatively framed in terms of displacement and altered place attachment. Especially among European and American scholars, there has been particular disagreement about the extent to which “forced relocation” (a neutral term, as will be argued) is inherently a harmful experience or whether only particular outcomes of relocation can be defined as such. This chapter discusses state-of-the-art knowledge to explore forced relocation outcomes in the Netherlands and how they are related to the broader scientific debate on forced relocation and displacement. The discussion on neighborhood impacts of forced relocation has focused on concepts such as social mix and social cohesion (e.g., Uitermark 2003), whereas relocation outcomes for individual tenants have been framed in terms of displacement and (altered) place attachment (Kleinhans and Kearns 2013). This chapter focuses on the latter strand of outcomes and identifies the Janus head of forced residential relocation, in the sense that the process and outcomes show different and sometimes highly contradictory faces with regard to several manifestations of the process and perceived outcomes in the Netherlands. To a certain extent, counseling approaches mitigate the negative impact on the well-being of relocatees. The Dutch experience with forced relocation provides a counter-narrative to the typical negative American gentrification/urban renewal narrative. The chapter concludes with policy recommendations for neighborhood revitalization.
荷兰以其相对较大的社会租赁住房存量而闻名于世。自1997年城市更新(Stedelijke Vernieuwing)的政策起源以来，城市重组获得了动力，特别是在战后早期的社区。随着拆迁和新住房建设成为重构的关键工具，租户的搬迁一直是关于城市重构影响的科学和政策辩论中的一个关键话题。关于强制搬迁对社区影响的讨论受到了士绅化、社会混合和社会凝聚力的概念框架的启发，而个人租户的搬迁结果在流离失所和改变的地方依恋方面大多是负面的。特别是在欧洲和美国的学者中，对于“强制搬迁”(一个中立的术语，将会被争论)在多大程度上是一种本质上有害的经历，或者是否只有搬迁的特定结果才能被定义为这种经历，存在着特别的分歧。本章讨论了最新的知识，以探索荷兰的强迫搬迁结果，以及它们如何与关于强迫搬迁和流离失所的更广泛的科学辩论相关联。关于强制搬迁对社区影响的讨论主要集中在社会混合和社会凝聚力等概念上(例如，Uitermark 2003)，而对个体租户的搬迁结果则是根据流离失所和(改变的)地方依恋(Kleinhans and Kearns 2013)。本章重点关注后一种结果，并确定强制居民搬迁的Janus头，因为过程和结果在荷兰的过程和感知结果的几种表现中显示出不同的，有时是高度矛盾的面孔。在一定程度上，咨询方法减轻了负面影响的福祉搬迁。荷兰在强制搬迁方面的经验与典型的负面美国中产阶级化/城市更新叙事相反。本章最后提出了社区振兴的政策建议。
{"title":"Urban Restructuring, Demolition, and Displacement in the Netherlands","authors":"R. Kleinhans","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-24","url":null,"abstract":"The Netherlands is internationally known for its relatively large social rented housing stock. Since the policy genesis of urban renewal (Stedelijke Vernieuwing) in 1997, urban restructuring has gained traction, especially in the early postwar neighborhoods. With demolition and new housing construction as key instruments of restructuring, the relocation of tenants has been a key topic in the scientific and policy debate about the implications of urban restructuring. The debate on neighborhood impacts of forced relocation has been inspired by a conceptual framework of gentrification, social mix, and social cohesion, whereas relocation outcomes for individual tenants have been mostly negatively framed in terms of displacement and altered place attachment. Especially among European and American scholars, there has been particular disagreement about the extent to which “forced relocation” (a neutral term, as will be argued) is inherently a harmful experience or whether only particular outcomes of relocation can be defined as such. This chapter discusses state-of-the-art knowledge to explore forced relocation outcomes in the Netherlands and how they are related to the broader scientific debate on forced relocation and displacement. The discussion on neighborhood impacts of forced relocation has focused on concepts such as social mix and social cohesion (e.g., Uitermark 2003), whereas relocation outcomes for individual tenants have been framed in terms of displacement and (altered) place attachment (Kleinhans and Kearns 2013). This chapter focuses on the latter strand of outcomes and identifies the Janus head of forced residential relocation, in the sense that the process and outcomes show different and sometimes highly contradictory faces with regard to several manifestations of the process and perceived outcomes in the Netherlands. To a certain extent, counseling approaches mitigate the negative impact on the well-being of relocatees. The Dutch experience with forced relocation provides a counter-narrative to the typical negative American gentrification/urban renewal narrative. The chapter concludes with policy recommendations for neighborhood revitalization.","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116441171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Homeownership and the Racial and Ethnic Wealth Gap in the United States","authors":"C. Reid","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131153741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-11
Kirk McClure
{"title":"Subsidized Rental Housing Programs in the U.S.","authors":"Kirk McClure","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"260 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115010929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-10
R. Ronald, C. Lennartz
Rates of homeownership advanced significantly across most advanced economies in the second half of the twentieth century. It not only became the dominant form of housing tenure, but also featured in emerging models of citizenship, welfare, and middle-class identity. Although English speaking, liberal economies such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the U.S. have been considered “homeowner societies” and strongly associated with owner-occupation as a cultural norm, widespread homeownership was largely achieved in these countries through political sponsorship and various forms of public subsidies. Among liberal societies, homeownership had a wide-ranging influence on policymaking and thinking more generally, and from the 1980s onward was advanced more aggressively. During this period, a more neoliberal regime of housing finance took hold, facilitating larger and more intensive circulations of capital and debt via an increasingly globalized network of housing and mortgage markets. The Credit Crisis and, ultimately, the Global Financial Crisis critically undermined housing markets and access to owner-occupation, and in recent years a new homeownership regime has begun to emerge. While the tenure remains central to both government and individual aspirations, actual rates of owner-occupation have been in decline. Behind this shift has been an increasing polarization of housing wealth and diminishing affordability and accessibility, especially for younger households. Critically, this chapter explores the rise and ostensible waning of mass homeownership with a focus on the social, economic, and political conditions that have both established its centrality in liberal capitalist economies and resulted in its recent decline.
{"title":"Declining Homeownership in Liberal, English Speaking Countries","authors":"R. Ronald, C. Lennartz","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-10","url":null,"abstract":"Rates of homeownership advanced significantly across most advanced economies in the second half of the twentieth century. It not only became the dominant form of housing tenure, but also featured in emerging models of citizenship, welfare, and middle-class identity. Although English speaking, liberal economies such as Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the UK, and the U.S. have been considered “homeowner societies” and strongly associated with owner-occupation as a cultural norm, widespread homeownership was largely achieved in these countries through political sponsorship and various forms of public subsidies. Among liberal societies, homeownership had a wide-ranging influence on policymaking and thinking more generally, and from the 1980s onward was advanced more aggressively. During this period, a more neoliberal regime of housing finance took hold, facilitating larger and more intensive circulations of capital and debt via an increasingly globalized network of housing and mortgage markets. The Credit Crisis and, ultimately, the Global Financial Crisis critically undermined housing markets and access to owner-occupation, and in recent years a new homeownership regime has begun to emerge. While the tenure remains central to both government and individual aspirations, actual rates of owner-occupation have been in decline. Behind this shift has been an increasing polarization of housing wealth and diminishing affordability and accessibility, especially for younger households. Critically, this chapter explores the rise and ostensible waning of mass homeownership with a focus on the social, economic, and political conditions that have both established its centrality in liberal capitalist economies and resulted in its recent decline.","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114684142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-20
Deirdre Pfeiffer, Ashlee Tziganuk, Scott Cloutier, Julia Colbert, Gracie Strasser
{"title":"Realizing Innovative Senior Housing Practices in the U.S.","authors":"Deirdre Pfeiffer, Ashlee Tziganuk, Scott Cloutier, Julia Colbert, Gracie Strasser","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129789766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-07-02DOI: 10.4324/9781315642338-30
A. Mallach
{"title":"Prediction Is Difficult","authors":"A. Mallach","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-30","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123084492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editors’ Introduction","authors":"Katrin B. Anacker, Mai Nguyên, D. Varady","doi":"10.4324/9781315642338-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642338-1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":220440,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Housing Policy and Planning","volume":"65 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132478700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：