Pub Date : 2022-01-01Epub Date: 2021-07-02DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1944954
Caitlin E Martin, Tawany Almeida, Bhushan Thakkar, Tiffany Kimbrough
Background: Postpartum is a highly vulnerable time for women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our primary objective was to identify patient and provider reported aspects of the pregnancy to postpartum transition that impact recovery progress for postpartum women receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Methods: This qualitative study consisted of semi-structured interviews with postpartum women in OUD treatment (n = 12) and providers (n = 9) at an outpatient addiction clinic. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using an editing style approach to report themes and quotes. Results: Patients and providers identified different themes that both promote and challenge recovery during the postpartum transition. These comprised of clinical factors, including MOUD, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) and pain associated with labor and delivery as well as psychosocial factors, such as role of a support system, mental health aspects of anxiety and depression causing mood changes, stigma and mistrust among healthcare providers and child welfare. Conclusions: Patients receiving MOUD and their providers identified multiple aspects unique to the postpartum transition that substantially strengthen and/or oppose OUD recovery. These aspects impacting recovery include factors specific to the receipt of MOUD treatment and those not specific to MOUD, yet tied to the postpartum state. Overall, these findings provide insight into areas for future research focused on identifying opportunities to promote recovery-oriented care for families affected by OUD.
{"title":"Postpartum and addiction recovery of women in opioid use disorder treatment: A qualitative study.","authors":"Caitlin E Martin, Tawany Almeida, Bhushan Thakkar, Tiffany Kimbrough","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.1944954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1944954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Postpartum is a highly vulnerable time for women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Our primary objective was to identify patient and provider reported aspects of the pregnancy to postpartum transition that impact recovery progress for postpartum women receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). <i>Methods:</i> This qualitative study consisted of semi-structured interviews with postpartum women in OUD treatment (<i>n</i> = 12) and providers (<i>n</i> = 9) at an outpatient addiction clinic. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using an editing style approach to report themes and quotes. <i>Results:</i> Patients and providers identified different themes that both promote and challenge recovery during the postpartum transition. These comprised of clinical factors, including MOUD, neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) and pain associated with labor and delivery as well as psychosocial factors, such as role of a support system, mental health aspects of anxiety and depression causing mood changes, stigma and mistrust among healthcare providers and child welfare. <i>Conclusions:</i> Patients receiving MOUD and their providers identified multiple aspects unique to the postpartum transition that substantially strengthen and/or oppose OUD recovery. These aspects impacting recovery include factors specific to the receipt of MOUD treatment and those not specific to MOUD, yet tied to the postpartum state. Overall, these findings provide insight into areas for future research focused on identifying opportunities to promote recovery-oriented care for families affected by OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2021.1944954","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39063297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01Epub Date: 2021-07-02DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1944956
Jasvinder A Singh
Objective: To assess whether cannabis use disorder (abuse or dependence) hospitalizations are increasing over time and examine the variables associated with the outcomes of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. Methods: This study examined the rates of hospitalizations with cannabis use disorder and associated healthcare utilization using the U.S. National Inpatient Sample data from 1998 to 2014. Adjusted logistic regression analyses assessed the association of demographic, comorbidity and hospital characteristics with healthcare utilization (total hospital charges, length of hospital stays, discharge to a non-home setting) during the index hospitalization for cannabis use disorder. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: There were an estimated 5,601,382 hospitalizations with cannabis use disorder (primary or secondary diagnosis). The rates of hospitalization (/100,000 admissions) for cannabis use disorder increased 3.7-fold from 439/100,000 admissions in 1998-2000 to 1,631/100,000 admissions in 2013-2014. In the adjusted analysis, the following factors were associated with worse healthcare utilization outcomes for cannabis use disorder hospitalizations: older age; Deyo-Charlson index score of 2 or higher; male sex; insurance payer other than private; higher income; hospital region; an urban hospital; and a medium to large hospital bed size. Conclusions: Rising hospitalization rate with cannabis use disorder from 1998 to 2014 is concerning. Our study identified independent variables associated with a higher risk of poor utilization outcomes of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. Healthcare policies should focus on reducing the burden of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. High-risk groups of people with cannabis use disorder with the worst outcomes should be targeted to reduce associated utilization.
{"title":"Time-trends in hospitalizations with cannabis use disorder: A 17-year U.S. national study.","authors":"Jasvinder A Singh","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.1944956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1944956","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> To assess whether cannabis use disorder (abuse or dependence) hospitalizations are increasing over time and examine the variables associated with the outcomes of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. <i>Methods:</i> This study examined the rates of hospitalizations with cannabis use disorder and associated healthcare utilization using the U.S. National Inpatient Sample data from 1998 to 2014. Adjusted logistic regression analyses assessed the association of demographic, comorbidity and hospital characteristics with healthcare utilization (total hospital charges, length of hospital stays, discharge to a non-home setting) during the index hospitalization for cannabis use disorder. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. <i>Results:</i> There were an estimated 5,601,382 hospitalizations with cannabis use disorder (primary or secondary diagnosis). The rates of hospitalization (/100,000 admissions) for cannabis use disorder increased 3.7-fold from 439/100,000 admissions in 1998-2000 to 1,631/100,000 admissions in 2013-2014. In the adjusted analysis, the following factors were associated with worse healthcare utilization outcomes for cannabis use disorder hospitalizations: older age; Deyo-Charlson index score of 2 or higher; male sex; insurance payer other than private; higher income; hospital region; an urban hospital; and a medium to large hospital bed size. <i>Conclusions:</i> Rising hospitalization rate with cannabis use disorder from 1998 to 2014 is concerning. Our study identified independent variables associated with a higher risk of poor utilization outcomes of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. Healthcare policies should focus on reducing the burden of cannabis use disorder hospitalizations. High-risk groups of people with cannabis use disorder with the worst outcomes should be targeted to reduce associated utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2021.1944956","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39143663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01Epub Date: 2020-06-16DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1773597
Sergi Trias-Llimós, Marina Bosque-Prous, Nuria Obradors-Rial, Ester Teixidó-Compañó, Maria José Belza, Fanny Janssen, Albert Espelt
Background: We examined educational inequalities in hazardous drinking prevalence among individuals aged 50 or more in 14 European countries, and explored educational inequalities in mortality in hazardous drinkers in European regions.
Methods: We analyzed data from waves 4, 5 and 6 of the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We estimated age-standardized hazardous drinking prevalence, and prevalence ratios (PR) of hazardous drinking by country and educational level using Poisson regression models with robust variance. We estimated the relative index of inequality (RII) for all-cause mortality among hazardous drinkers and non-hazardous drinkers using Cox proportional hazards regression models and for each region (North, South, East and West).
Results: In men, educational inequalities in hazardous drinking were not observed (PRmedium = 1.09 [95%CI: 0.98-1.21] and PRhigh = 0.99 [95%CI: 0.88-1.10], ref. low), while in they were observed in women, having the highest hazardous drinking prevalence in the highest educational levels (PRmedium = 1.28 [95%CI: 1.15-1.42] and PRhigh = 1.53 [95%CI: 1.36-1.72]). Overall, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) in all-cause mortality among hazardous drinkers was 1.12 [95%CI: 1.03-1.22] among men and 1.10 [95%CI: 0.97-1.25] among women. Educational inequalities among hazardous drinkers were observed in Eastern Europe for both men (RIIhazardous = 1.21 [95%CI: 1.01-1.45]) and women (RIIhazardous = 1.46 [95%CI: 1.13-1.87]). Educational inequalities in mortality among non-hazardous drinkers were observed in Southern, Western and Eastern Europe among men, and in Eastern Europe among women.
Conclusions: Higher educational attainment is positively associated with hazardous drinking prevalence among women, but not among men in most of the analyzed European countries. Clear educational inequalities in mortality among hazardous drinkers were only observed in Eastern Europe. Further research on the associations between alcohol use and inequalities in all-cause mortality in different regions is needed.
{"title":"Alcohol and educational inequalities: Hazardous drinking prevalence and all-cause mortality by hazardous drinking group in people aged 50 and older in Europe.","authors":"Sergi Trias-Llimós, Marina Bosque-Prous, Nuria Obradors-Rial, Ester Teixidó-Compañó, Maria José Belza, Fanny Janssen, Albert Espelt","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2020.1773597","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2020.1773597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined educational inequalities in hazardous drinking prevalence among individuals aged 50 or more in 14 European countries, and explored educational inequalities in mortality in hazardous drinkers in European regions.</p><p><p><i>Methods:</i> We analyzed data from waves 4, 5 and 6 of the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). We estimated age-standardized hazardous drinking prevalence, and prevalence ratios (PR) of hazardous drinking by country and educational level using Poisson regression models with robust variance. We estimated the relative index of inequality (RII) for all-cause mortality among hazardous drinkers and non-hazardous drinkers using Cox proportional hazards regression models and for each region (North, South, East and West).</p><p><p><i>Results:</i> In men, educational inequalities in hazardous drinking were not observed (PR<sub>medium</sub> = 1.09 [95%CI: 0.98-1.21] and PR<sub>high</sub> = 0.99 [95%CI: 0.88-1.10], ref. low), while in they were observed in women, having the highest hazardous drinking prevalence in the highest educational levels (PR<sub>medium</sub> = 1.28 [95%CI: 1.15-1.42] and PR<sub>high</sub> = 1.53 [95%CI: 1.36-1.72]). Overall, the Relative Index of Inequality (RII) in all-cause mortality among hazardous drinkers was 1.12 [95%CI: 1.03-1.22] among men and 1.10 [95%CI: 0.97-1.25] among women. Educational inequalities among hazardous drinkers were observed in Eastern Europe for both men (RII<sub>hazardous</sub> = 1.21 [95%CI: 1.01-1.45]) and women (RII<sub>hazardous</sub> = 1.46 [95%CI: 1.13-1.87]). Educational inequalities in mortality among non-hazardous drinkers were observed in Southern, Western and Eastern Europe among men, and in Eastern Europe among women.</p><p><p><i>Conclusions:</i> Higher educational attainment is positively associated with hazardous drinking prevalence among women, but not among men in most of the analyzed European countries. Clear educational inequalities in mortality among hazardous drinkers were only observed in Eastern Europe. Further research on the associations between alcohol use and inequalities in all-cause mortality in different regions is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2020.1773597","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38052908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007520
Simeon D Kimmel, Kristina T Phillips, Bradley J Anderson, Michael D Stein
Background: Hospitalizations for people who inject drugs (PWID) are opportunities to address substance use. However, little is known about hospitalized PWIDs' motivation to stop substance use or improve skin and needle hygiene, common means for reducing injection sequelae. Methods: We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to improve skin and needle hygiene among 252 hospitalized PWID between January 2014 and June 2018. We examined motivation (scale 1-10) to stop substance use, use new needles, and clean skin and used multiple linear regression models to evaluate characteristics associated with these outcomes. Results: PWID were recruited during injection-related (154, 61.1%) and non-injection-related hospitalizations (98, 38.9%). Motivation to stop substance use was 7.11 (SD = 2.67), use new needles was 7.8 (SD = 1.9), and clean skin was 6.7 (SD = 2.3). In adjusted models, experiencing an injection-related hospitalization was not significantly associated (p > 0.05) with motivation to stop substance use (β = -0.76, SE = 0.299), use new needles (β = 0.301, SE = 0.255), or clean skin (β = 0.476, SE = 0.323). Number of past-year skin and soft tissue infections was negatively associated with motivation to use new needles (β = -0.109, SE = 0.049, p < 0.05) and clean skin (β = -0.131, SE = 0.062, p < 0.05). Greater opioid withdrawal was associated with lower motivation to use new needles (β = -0.275, SE = 0.92, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Among hospitalized PWID, motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene was moderately high, but injection-related hospitalizations were not associated with greater motivation. Efforts to reduce injection sequelae for all hospitalized PWID are needed.
{"title":"Characteristics associated with motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene among hospitalized patients who inject drugs.","authors":"Simeon D Kimmel, Kristina T Phillips, Bradley J Anderson, Michael D Stein","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007520","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Hospitalizations for people who inject drugs (PWID) are opportunities to address substance use. However, little is known about hospitalized PWIDs' motivation to stop substance use or improve skin and needle hygiene, common means for reducing injection sequelae. <i>Methods:</i> We used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to improve skin and needle hygiene among 252 hospitalized PWID between January 2014 and June 2018. We examined motivation (scale 1-10) to stop substance use, use new needles, and clean skin and used multiple linear regression models to evaluate characteristics associated with these outcomes. <i>Results:</i> PWID were recruited during injection-related (154, 61.1%) and non-injection-related hospitalizations (98, 38.9%). Motivation to stop substance use was 7.11 (<i>SD =</i> 2.67), use new needles was 7.8 (<i>SD</i> = 1.9), and clean skin was 6.7 (<i>SD</i> = 2.3). In adjusted models, experiencing an injection-related hospitalization was not significantly associated (<i>p</i> > 0.05) with motivation to stop substance use (β = -0.76, <i>SE</i> = 0.299), use new needles (β = 0.301, <i>SE</i> = 0.255), or clean skin (β = 0.476, <i>SE</i> = 0.323). Number of past-year skin and soft tissue infections was negatively associated with motivation to use new needles (β = -0.109, <i>SE</i> = 0.049, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and clean skin (β = -0.131, <i>SE</i> = 0.062, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Greater opioid withdrawal was associated with lower motivation to use new needles (β = -0.275, <i>SE</i> = 0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.01). <i>Conclusions:</i> Among hospitalized PWID, motivation to stop substance use and improve skin and needle hygiene was moderately high, but injection-related hospitalizations were not associated with greater motivation. Efforts to reduce injection sequelae for all hospitalized PWID are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907781/pdf/nihms-1865857.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9224587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01Epub Date: 2020-04-03DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2020.1748163
Scott G Weiner, Olesya Baker, Dana Bernson, Jeremiah D Schuur
Study objective: Prehospital use of naloxone for presumed opioid overdose has increased markedly in recent years because of the current opioid overdose epidemic. In this study, we determine the 1-year mortality of suspected opioid overdose patients who were treated with naloxone by EMS and initially survived. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients using three linked statewide datasets in Massachusetts: emergency medical services (EMS), a master demographics file, and death records. We included all suspected opioid overdose patients who were treated with naloxone by EMS. The primary outcome measures were death within 3 days of treatment and between 4 days and 1 year of treatment. Results: Between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015, there were 9734 individuals who met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Of these, 807 (8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7-8.8%)) died in the first 3 days, 668 (6.9% (95% CI 6.4-7.4%)) died between 4 days and 1 year, and 8259 (84.8% (95% CI 84.1-85.6%)) were still alive at 1 year. Excluding those who died within 3 days, 668 of the remaining 8927 individuals (7.5% (95% CI 6.9-8.0%)) died within 1 year. Conclusion: The 1-year mortality of those who are treated with naloxone for opioid overdose by EMS is high. Communities should focus both on primary prevention and interventions for this patient population, including strengthening regional treatment centers and expanding access to medication for opioid use disorder.
{"title":"One year mortality of patients treated with naloxone for opioid overdose by emergency medical services.","authors":"Scott G Weiner, Olesya Baker, Dana Bernson, Jeremiah D Schuur","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2020.1748163","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08897077.2020.1748163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Study objective</i>: Prehospital use of naloxone for presumed opioid overdose has increased markedly in recent years because of the current opioid overdose epidemic. In this study, we determine the 1-year mortality of suspected opioid overdose patients who were treated with naloxone by EMS and initially survived. <i>Methods</i>: This was a retrospective observational study of patients using three linked statewide datasets in Massachusetts: emergency medical services (EMS), a master demographics file, and death records. We included all suspected opioid overdose patients who were treated with naloxone by EMS. The primary outcome measures were death within 3 days of treatment and between 4 days and 1 year of treatment. <i>Results</i>: Between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015, there were 9734 individuals who met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Of these, 807 (8.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7-8.8%)) died in the first 3 days, 668 (6.9% (95% CI 6.4-7.4%)) died between 4 days and 1 year, and 8259 (84.8% (95% CI 84.1-85.6%)) were still alive at 1 year. Excluding those who died within 3 days, 668 of the remaining 8927 individuals (7.5% (95% CI 6.9-8.0%)) died within 1 year. <i>Conclusion</i>: The 1-year mortality of those who are treated with naloxone for opioid overdose by EMS is high. Communities should focus both on primary prevention and interventions for this patient population, including strengthening regional treatment centers and expanding access to medication for opioid use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7541791/pdf/nihms-1607807.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10460627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007514
Melanie A Stowell, Tara Thomas-Gale, Hendrée E Jones, Ingrid Binswanger, Deborah J Rinehart
Background Studies have consistently found high rates of unintended pregnancy among women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Few interventions have been developed to specifically engage and address the family planning (FP) needs of women in substance use disorder treatment. Objectives: Our goal was to collect formative qualitative data to identify the FP experiences, needs and service preferences of women receiving medications for OUD and to use these data to develop a FP education and navigation intervention that could be tested in diverse, resource-limited treatment settings. Methods: From August 2016 to April 2017, we conducted 21 guided qualitative interviews with women from two outpatient treatment clinics in Denver, Colorado. We recorded, transcribed, and coded all interviews. We then facilitated three focus groups (n = 16) from May to July 2017 to verify or challenge interview themes and to further inform the development of the FP intervention. Results: Most participants expressed ambivalence or low perceived risk regarding unintended pregnancy and desired more information about contraceptive methods. Many participants described mistrust or lack of engagement in the medical system and histories of trauma were a common barrier to seeking services. Focus group participants endorsed a peer-led FP navigation intervention and provided feedback to tailor existing FP educational materials to fit the specific needs of women in recovery. Conclusions/Importance: Results from this qualitative study suggest that women in recovery from OUD have unique, unmet FP education and service needs. These findings provide important information for the development of feasible and acceptable FP service delivery within diverse, resource-limited treatment settings and informed the development of a trauma-informed, peer-led FP education and navigation intervention that would be implemented in a subsequent phase of the study.
{"title":"Perspectives among women receiving medications for opioid use disorder: Implications for development of a peer navigation intervention to improve access to family planning services.","authors":"Melanie A Stowell, Tara Thomas-Gale, Hendrée E Jones, Ingrid Binswanger, Deborah J Rinehart","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007514","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007514","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i> Studies have consistently found high rates of unintended pregnancy among women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Few interventions have been developed to specifically engage and address the family planning (FP) needs of women in substance use disorder treatment. <i>Objectives</i>: Our goal was to collect formative qualitative data to identify the FP experiences, needs and service preferences of women receiving medications for OUD and to use these data to develop a FP education and navigation intervention that could be tested in diverse, resource-limited treatment settings. <i>Methods</i>: From August 2016 to April 2017, we conducted 21 guided qualitative interviews with women from two outpatient treatment clinics in Denver, Colorado. We recorded, transcribed, and coded all interviews. We then facilitated three focus groups (<i>n</i> = 16) from May to July 2017 to verify or challenge interview themes and to further inform the development of the FP intervention. <i>Results</i>: Most participants expressed ambivalence or low perceived risk regarding unintended pregnancy and desired more information about contraceptive methods. Many participants described mistrust or lack of engagement in the medical system and histories of trauma were a common barrier to seeking services. Focus group participants endorsed a peer-led FP navigation intervention and provided feedback to tailor existing FP educational materials to fit the specific needs of women in recovery. <i>Conclusions/Importance</i>: Results from this qualitative study suggest that women in recovery from OUD have unique, unmet FP education and service needs. These findings provide important information for the development of feasible and acceptable FP service delivery within diverse, resource-limited treatment settings and informed the development of a trauma-informed, peer-led FP education and navigation intervention that would be implemented in a subsequent phase of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9743830/pdf/nihms-1850029.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10806641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01Epub Date: 2019-10-22DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1671941
Rachel Gonzales-Castaneda, James R McKay, Jane Steinberg, Ken C Winters, Chong Ho Alex Yu, Irene C Valdovinos, Janna M Casillas, Kyle C McCarthy
Background: The goal of this paper is to advance the understanding of mechanisms of action involved in behavioral-driven aftercare interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) among youth populations. This paper reports data from a study that measured the impact of an aftercare intervention on primary substance use relapse among youth who completed treatment in Los Angeles County for SUDs. The aftercare intervention, Project ESQYIR-Educating and Supporting inQuisitive Youth In Recovery, utilized text messaging to monitor relapse and recovery processes, provide feedback, reminders, support, and education among youth from SUD specialty settings during the initial 3-month period following treatment completion.
Method: Mediational modeling informed by Baron and Kenny was used to examine the extent to which select recovery processes including participation in extracurricular activities and self-help, were impacted by the texting intervention, and if such processes helped sustain recovery and prevent primary substance use relapse. The data come from a two-group randomized controlled pilot study testing the initial efficacy of a mobile health texting aftercare intervention among 80 youth (Mage= 20.7, SD = 3.5, range: 14-26 years) who volunteered to participate after completing SUD treatment between 2012 and 2013.
Results: Among the two recovery processes examined in the mediational modeling, only involvement in extracurricular activities mediated the effects of the texting aftercare intervention on reductions in primary substance use relapse; not self-help participation.
Conclusion: Findings from this pilot study offer greater understanding about potential recovery-related mechanisms of action of mobile aftercare interventions. Mobile texting was found to promote increased engagement in recovery-related behaviors such as participation in extracurricular activities, which mediated the effects of the mobile aftercare intervention on decreasing primary substance use relapse. Findings suggest mobile approaches may be effective for increasing adherence to a wide-array of recovery behavioral regiments among youth populations challenged by complex behavioral issues.
{"title":"Testing mediational processes of substance use relapse among youth who participated in a mobile texting aftercare project.","authors":"Rachel Gonzales-Castaneda, James R McKay, Jane Steinberg, Ken C Winters, Chong Ho Alex Yu, Irene C Valdovinos, Janna M Casillas, Kyle C McCarthy","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2019.1671941","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08897077.2019.1671941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this paper is to advance the understanding of mechanisms of action involved in behavioral-driven aftercare interventions for substance use disorders (SUDs) among youth populations. This paper reports data from a study that measured the impact of an aftercare intervention on primary substance use relapse among youth who completed treatment in Los Angeles County for SUDs. The aftercare intervention, Project ESQYIR-<i>Educating and Supporting inQuisitive Youth In Recovery</i>, utilized text messaging to monitor relapse and recovery processes, provide feedback, reminders, support, and education among youth from SUD specialty settings during the initial 3-month period following treatment completion.</p><p><p><i>Method:</i> Mediational modeling informed by Baron and Kenny was used to examine the extent to which select recovery processes including participation in extracurricular activities and self-help, were impacted by the texting intervention, and if such processes helped sustain recovery and prevent primary substance use relapse. The data come from a two-group randomized controlled pilot study testing the initial efficacy of a mobile health texting aftercare intervention among 80 youth (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub>= 20.7, <i>SD</i> = 3.5, range: 14-26 years) who volunteered to participate after completing SUD treatment between 2012 and 2013.</p><p><p><i>Results:</i> Among the two recovery processes examined in the mediational modeling, only involvement in extracurricular activities mediated the effects of the texting aftercare intervention on reductions in primary substance use relapse; not self-help participation.</p><p><p><i>Conclusion:</i> Findings from this pilot study offer greater understanding about potential recovery-related mechanisms of action of mobile aftercare interventions. Mobile texting was found to promote increased engagement in recovery-related behaviors such as participation in extracurricular activities, which mediated the effects of the mobile aftercare intervention on decreasing primary substance use relapse. Findings suggest mobile approaches may be effective for increasing adherence to a wide-array of recovery behavioral regiments among youth populations challenged by complex behavioral issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174140/pdf/nihms-1540964.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10512975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1686724
Douglas Polcin, Jane Witbrodt, Madhabika B Nayak, Rachael Korcha, Sheila Pugh, Michelle Salinardi
Background: Women with alcohol disorders have more severe problems related to their drinking than men. They have higher mortality from alcohol-related accidents and enter treatment with more serious medical, psychiatric, and social consequences.
Objective: This study assessed the effects of Intensive Motivational Interviewing (IMI), a new, 9-session counseling intervention for women with drinking problems.
Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 215 women. Most were white (83%), college educated (61%), and older (mean age 51). Half received IMI and half a standard single session of MI (SMI) along with an attention control (nutritional education).
Results: Generalized estimating equations models showed women who were heavy drinkers at baseline in the IMI condition reduced heavy drinking more than those in the SMI condition at 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Analyses of disaggregated subgroups showed IMI was most effective for women with low psychiatric severity, more severe physical and impulse control consequences associated with drinking, and higher motivation. However, formal 3-way interaction models (condition by moderator by time) showed significant effects primarily at 2 months.
Conclusions: Improvements associated with IMI were limited to heavy drinking and varied among subgroups of women. Studies of women with more diverse characteristics are needed.
{"title":"Characteristics of women with alcohol use disorders who benefit from intensive motivational interviewing.","authors":"Douglas Polcin, Jane Witbrodt, Madhabika B Nayak, Rachael Korcha, Sheila Pugh, Michelle Salinardi","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2019.1686724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1686724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with alcohol disorders have more severe problems related to their drinking than men. They have higher mortality from alcohol-related accidents and enter treatment with more serious medical, psychiatric, and social consequences.</p><p><p><i>Objective</i>: This study assessed the effects of Intensive Motivational Interviewing (IMI), a new, 9-session counseling intervention for women with drinking problems.</p><p><p><i>Methods</i>: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 215 women. Most were white (83%), college educated (61%), and older (mean age 51). Half received IMI and half a standard single session of MI (SMI) along with an attention control (nutritional education).</p><p><p><i>Results</i>: Generalized estimating equations models showed women who were heavy drinkers at baseline in the IMI condition reduced heavy drinking more than those in the SMI condition at 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Analyses of disaggregated subgroups showed IMI was most effective for women with low psychiatric severity, more severe physical and impulse control consequences associated with drinking, and higher motivation. However, formal 3-way interaction models (condition by moderator by time) showed significant effects primarily at 2 months.</p><p><p><i>Conclusions</i>: Improvements associated with IMI were limited to heavy drinking and varied among subgroups of women. Studies of women with more diverse characteristics are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2019.1686724","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10455948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.2007519
S Kawasaki, G Hwang, K Buckner, E Francis, S Huffnagle, J Kraschnewski, P Vulgamore, A Lucas, J Barbour, M Crawford, L Thomas, M Fuller, J Meyers, G Swartzentruber, R Levine
Background: The opioid epidemic continues to erode communities across Pennsylvania (PA). Federal and PA state programs developed grants to establish Hub and Spoke programs for the expansion of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Employing the telementoring platform Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes), Penn State Health engaged the other seven grant awardees in a Collaborative Health Systems (CHS) ECHO. We conducted key informant interviews to better understand impact of the CHS ECHO on health systems collaboration and opioid crisis efforts. Methods: For eight one-hour sessions, each awardee presented their unique strategies, challenges, and opportunities. Using REDCap, program characteristics, such as number of waivered prescribers and number of patients served were collected at baseline. After completion of the sessions, key informant interviews were conducted to assess the impact of CHS ECHO on awardee's programs. Results: Analysis of key informant interviews revealed important themes to address opioid crisis efforts, including the need for strategic and proactive program reevaluation and the convenience of collaborative peer learning networks. Participants expressed benefits of the CHS ECHO including allowing space for discussion of challenges and best practices and facilitating conversation on collaborative targeted advocacy and systems-level improvements. Participants further reported bolstered motivation and confidence. Conclusions: Utilizing Project ECHO provided a bidirectional platform of learning and support that created important connections between institutions working to combat the opioid epidemic. CHS ECHO was a unique opportunity for productive and convenient peer learning across external partners. Open dialogue developed during CHS ECHO can continue to direct systems-levels improvements that benefit individual and population outcomes.
{"title":"Collaborative health systems ECHO: The use of a tele-education platform to facilitate communication and collaboration with recipients of state targeted response funds in Pennsylvania.","authors":"S Kawasaki, G Hwang, K Buckner, E Francis, S Huffnagle, J Kraschnewski, P Vulgamore, A Lucas, J Barbour, M Crawford, L Thomas, M Fuller, J Meyers, G Swartzentruber, R Levine","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.2007519","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.2007519","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The opioid epidemic continues to erode communities across Pennsylvania (PA). Federal and PA state programs developed grants to establish Hub and Spoke programs for the expansion of medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD). Employing the telementoring platform Project ECHO (Extension for Community Health Outcomes), Penn State Health engaged the other seven grant awardees in a Collaborative Health Systems (CHS) ECHO. We conducted key informant interviews to better understand impact of the CHS ECHO on health systems collaboration and opioid crisis efforts. <i>Methods:</i> For eight one-hour sessions, each awardee presented their unique strategies, challenges, and opportunities. Using REDCap, program characteristics, such as number of waivered prescribers and number of patients served were collected at baseline. After completion of the sessions, key informant interviews were conducted to assess the impact of CHS ECHO on awardee's programs. <i>Results:</i> Analysis of key informant interviews revealed important themes to address opioid crisis efforts, including the need for strategic and proactive program reevaluation and the convenience of collaborative peer learning networks. Participants expressed benefits of the CHS ECHO including allowing space for discussion of challenges and best practices and facilitating conversation on collaborative targeted advocacy and systems-level improvements. Participants further reported bolstered motivation and confidence. <i>Conclusions:</i> Utilizing Project ECHO provided a bidirectional platform of learning and support that created important connections between institutions working to combat the opioid epidemic. CHS ECHO was a unique opportunity for productive and convenient peer learning across external partners. Open dialogue developed during CHS ECHO can continue to direct systems-levels improvements that benefit individual and population outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627399/pdf/nihms-1842169.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10459032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1941520
Austin Le, Benjamin H Han, Joseph J Palamar
Background: Accurate prevalence estimates are critical to epidemiological research but discordant responses on self-report surveys can lead to over- or underestimation of drug use. We sought to examine the extent and nature of underreported cannabis use (among those later reporting blunt use) from a national drug survey in the US. Methods: We used data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N = 281,650), a nationally representative probability sample of non-institutionalized populations in the US. We compared self-reported prevalence of past-year cannabis use and blunt use and delineated correlates of underreporting cannabis use, defined as reporting blunt use but not overall cannabis use. Results: An estimated 4.8% (95% CI: 4.4-5.2) of people reported blunt use but not cannabis use. Although corrected prevalence, cannabis use recoded as use only increased from 15.2% (95% CI: 15.0-15.4) to 15.5% (95% CI: 15.3-15.7), individuals who are aged ≥50 (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.06-3.08), female (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12-1.62), Non-Hispanic Black (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.16-1.76), or report lower English proficiency (aOR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.40-7.83) are at increased odds for providing such a discordant response. Individuals with a college degree (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.84) and those reporting past-year use of tobacco (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91), alcohol (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.33-0.54), cocaine (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73), or LSD (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.87) were at lower odds of providing a discordant response. Conclusion: Although changes in prevalence are small when correcting for discordant responses, results provide insight into subgroups that may be more likely to underreport use on surveys.
{"title":"Underreporting of past-year cannabis use on a national survey by people who smoke blunts.","authors":"Austin Le, Benjamin H Han, Joseph J Palamar","doi":"10.1080/08897077.2021.1941520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1941520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Accurate prevalence estimates are critical to epidemiological research but discordant responses on self-report surveys can lead to over- or underestimation of drug use. We sought to examine the extent and nature of underreported cannabis use (among those later reporting blunt use) from a national drug survey in the US. <i>Methods:</i> We used data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (<i>N</i> = 281,650), a nationally representative probability sample of non-institutionalized populations in the US. We compared self-reported prevalence of past-year cannabis use and blunt use and delineated correlates of underreporting cannabis use, defined as reporting blunt use but not overall cannabis use. <i>Results:</i> An estimated 4.8% (95% CI: 4.4-5.2) of people reported blunt use but not cannabis use. Although corrected prevalence, cannabis use recoded as use only increased from 15.2% (95% CI: 15.0-15.4) to 15.5% (95% CI: 15.3-15.7), individuals who are aged ≥50 (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.06-3.08), female (aOR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12-1.62), Non-Hispanic Black (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.16-1.76), or report lower English proficiency (aOR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.40-7.83) are at increased odds for providing such a discordant response. Individuals with a college degree (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.84) and those reporting past-year use of tobacco (aOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91), alcohol (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.33-0.54), cocaine (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.73), or LSD (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.87) were at lower odds of providing a discordant response. <i>Conclusion:</i> Although changes in prevalence are small when correcting for discordant responses, results provide insight into subgroups that may be more likely to underreport use on surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":22108,"journal":{"name":"Substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08897077.2021.1941520","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10513519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}