Swiss medical weekly最新文献

Aim of the study: Our study aimed to assess the first-attempt success rate of ultrasound (US) and anatomical landmark (ALM) guidance for vascular cannulation in children with congenital heart disease in Switzerland.

Methods: A prospective observational multicentre study was conducted from January 2022 to January 2023 in three university hospitals in Switzerland. We included patients with congenital heart disease aged 0 to 18 years who were scheduled for elective cardiac catheterisation. Periprocedural data were collected anonymously. The choice of vessel and guidance technique were at the operator's discretion.

Results: 177 arterial and 240 venous cannulations in 253 patients were analysed. The median age and weight were 4.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2-8.8) and 15 kg (IQR 8-27), respectively. Nearly all operators, 97.5%, were deemed experienced. The femoral artery and femoral vein were the most preferred vessels. US guidance was used in 62% of procedures, predominantly within populations who were younger, smaller and of lower weight.The success rate at the first attempt was notably higher with US guidance for arterial cannulation (US: 80%, ALM: 37%, p <0.001) and venous cannulation (US: 78% vs ALM: 47%, p <0.001). Overall success rates for venous and arterial cannulation were comparable between ultrasound and anatomical landmark guidance. A total of 45 complications (10.5%) occurred, with immediate uncomplicated haematoma being the most frequent.

Conclusion: US guidance is preferred for the localisation and cannulation of vessels during cardiac catheterisation within paediatric cardiology departments in Switzerland. Given its high success rate for first-attempt cannulation, US warrants additional research to evaluate its potential in reducing complications.

Introduction: The transition from paediatric to adult medical care is a critical period for adolescents with spina bifida, often marked by deteriorating health and functional status.

Objectives: To describe the health status and functioning of individuals with spina bifida at the time of transition from paediatric to adult care and to identify risk profiles for potentially modifiable secondary health conditions (urinary tract infections, pressure injuries, respiratory problems and obesity).

Methods: Descriptive study of data (derived from medical records) from all adolescents and young adults with spina bifida aged 15-25 years who were referred to a single specialised spinal cord injury centre as part of the transition programme during the period from 1 September 2015 to 31 May 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population and to analyse the frequency and co-occurrence of congenital and acquired secondary health conditions. The equality of proportions test was used to test the prevalence of secondary health conditions based on important personal and clinical characteristics.

Results: We included 43 adolescents with spina bifida with a mean age of 18.4 years (SD 2.5); in 63% of them the neurological level was lumbar, and around 50% of them were wheelchair-dependent. The median Spinal Cord Injury Measure (SCIM) III score was 72 (IQR 61-89). The mean number of secondary health conditions at time of transition was 8.8. The most prevalent secondary health conditions were lower urinary tract dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and contractures. Respiratory problems were more prevalent in females and in individuals with lower SCIM III scores, whereas no differences were observed in the prevalence of other modifiable secondary health conditions. Clustering of secondary health conditions was mainly seen for urinary tract infection + pressure injury and for urinary tract infection + pressure injury + obesity.

Conclusion: The prevalence of secondary health conditions among individuals with spina bifida at time of transition is alarmingly high and functional profiles underscore the need for supporting adolescents and young adults with daily medical issues. The study highlights the critical role of transition programmes and interdisciplinary follow-up care in preventing health problems and improving functioning and independence in everyday life.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on hospitals worldwide. In such a context of tension in healthcare systems, efficiently allocating hospital resources is a crucial aspect of crisis management. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of readmitted patients and to determine risk factors for hospital readmission using data from the Swiss COVID-19 Hospital-Based Surveillance system (CH-SUR).

Methods: We investigated hospital readmissions within 60 days after discharge of patients from the CH-SUR surveillance system with a first hospitalisation between 1 December 2020 and 1 December 2021. Only community-acquired cases were considered. We compared the baseline characteristics of readmitted and non-readmitted patients. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate the risk factors for hospital readmission.

Findings: Of the 8039 eligible patients, 239 (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-3.3%) were readmitted to hospital within 60 days of discharge, with no significant variations observed over the study period; 80% of all readmissions occurred within 10 days of discharge of the index hospital stay. Based on our multivariable logistic regression models, factors increasing the odds of hospital readmission were age ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% CI 1.24-2.15), male sex (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.93), being discharged to home after first hospitalisation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.19-2.62), having oncological pathology (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.61) and being immunosuppressed (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.67-3.29).

Interpretations: Age, sex, cardiovascular diseases, oncological pathologies and immunosuppression were the main risk factors identified for hospital readmission.

Aims of the study: This prospective study, conducted with patients from the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic at the Pulmonary Division of the Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, aimed to investigate changes in patients' main symptoms, elements that aided in coping with the condition and satisfaction with the consulting and therapeutic interventions.

Methods: After obtaining ethical approval, fifty patients were consecutively included in this longitudinal study, which incorporated three survey times post-consultation: t1 (0-7 days), t2 (4-8 weeks) and t3 (4-6 months). The survey comprised standardised questionnaires, including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and the Chalder Fatigue scale, along with study-specific questions regarding symptoms and reasons for consulting the post-COVID outpatient clinic. Additionally, ten patients were invited to participate in qualitative individual interviews at t2 and t3.

Results: The study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2023. The median age of the 50 participants was 47 years (IQR: 36-55), with 66% (33/50) being female. Most participants (66% or 33/50) reported no pre-existing conditions prior to COVID-19 infection, and only six patients required hospitalisation during the acute phase of their infection. Visits to the multidisciplinary post-COVID clinic occurred approximately eight months post-infection, with referrals primarily made by primary care physicians (82% or 41/50). The majority of patients experienced persistent tiredness, exhaustion and fatigue (94% or 47/50), along with reduced physical performance (82% or 41/50), while pain or breathing difficulties were less frequently mentioned. At t1, around half of the patients were fully or partially unable to work, a proportion that reduced to around a third by t3. Symptoms generally decreased over time, with significant improvements observed between t2 and t3. However, subjectively perceived cognitive limitations worsened or were reported more frequently over time. Most patients (96% or 48/50) felt well cared for throughout their consultations. In qualitative interviews, patients highlighted the medical staff's attentiveness and the time dedicated to consultations, which made them feel that their complaints were taken seriously and that they received appropriate information.

Conclusions: The results confirmed that the multidisciplinary post-COVID outpatient clinic met most respondents' expectations. Patients found that the attentive interprofessional coaching was most helpful in coping with their illness. However, participants also noted long waiting times and expressed a desire for earlier admission to the clinic.

Aims of the study: Opioid prescriptions have increased in Switzerland, even though current guidelines warn of their harms. If opioids for postoperative analgesia are not tapered before hospital discharge, patients are at risk of adverse events such as constipation, drowsiness, dependence, tolerance and withdrawal. The aim of this study was to investigate and quantify the potential association between opioids prescribed at discharge from hospital and rehospitalisation.

Methods: We conducted a nested case-control study using routinely collected electronic health records from a Swiss public acute hospital. Cases were patients aged 65 years or older admitted between November 2014 and December 2018, with documented opioid administration on the day of discharge and rehospitalisation within 18 or 30 days after discharge. Each case was matched to five controls for age, sex, year of hospitalisation and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We calculated odds ratios for 18-day and 30-day rehospitalisation based on exposure to opioids using a conditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. Secondary analyses included stratifications into morphine-equivalent doses of <50 mg, 50-89 mg and ≥90 mg, and co-prescriptions of gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines.

Results: Of 22,471 included patients, 3144 rehospitalisations were identified, of which 1698 were 18-day rehospitalisations and 1446 were 30-day rehospitalisations. Documented opioid administration on the day of discharge was associated with 30-day rehospitalisation after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.48; 95% CI 1.25-1.75, p <0.001), while no difference was observed in the likelihood of 18-day rehospitalisation. The combined prescription of opioids with benzodiazepines or gabapentinoids and morphine-equivalent doses >50 mg were rare.

Conclusions: Patients receiving opioids on the day of discharge were 48% more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 30 days. Clinicians should aim to discontinue opioids started in hospital before discharge if possible. Patients receiving an opioid prescription should be educated and monitored as part of opioid stewardship programmes.

No abstract available.

No abstract available.

Aim of the study: We aimed to evaluate the utilisation of all prescribed drugs during pregnancy dispensed in outpatient care in Switzerland between 2015 and 2021.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive study using the Swiss Helsana claims database (2015-2021). We established a cohort of pregnancies by identifying deliveries and estimating the date of the last menstrual period. We analysed the drug burden during a 270-day pre-pregnancy period, during pregnancy (overall and by trimester), and during a 270-day postpartum period. Subsequently, we quantified 1) the median number of drug dispensations (total vs. unique drug claims); and 2) the prevalence of exposure to at least one dispensed drug and the number of dispensed drugs (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5); and 3) the 15 most frequently dispensed drugs were identified during each period, overall and stratified by maternal age.

Results: Among 34,584 pregnant women (5.6% of all successful pregnancies in Switzerland), 87.5% claimed at least one drug (not including vitamins, supplements, and vaccines), and 33.3% claimed at least five drugs during pregnancy. During trimester 1 alone, 8.2% of women claimed at least five distinct drugs. The proportion of women who claimed prescribed drugs was lower pre-pregnancy (69.1%) and similar postpartum (85.6%) when compared to during pregnancy (87.5%). The most frequently claimed drugs during pregnancy were meaningfully different during pregnancy than before and after.

Conclusions: This study suggests that 8 of 10 women in Switzerland are exposed to prescribed drugs during pregnancy. Most drugs dispensed during pregnancy are comparatively well investigated and are considered safe. However, the high drug burden in this vulnerable patient population underlines the importance of evidence on the benefit-risk profile of individual drugs taken during pregnancy.