首页 > 最新文献

The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic最新文献

英文 中文
On Logics and Semantics for Interpretability 论可解释性的逻辑与语义
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.3
Luka Mikec
Abstract We study various properties of formalised relativised interpretability. In the central part of this thesis we study for different interpretability logics the following aspects: completeness for modal semantics, decidability and algorithmic complexity. In particular, we study two basic types of relational semantics for interpretability logics. One is the Veltman semantics, which we shall refer to as the regular or ordinary semantics; the other is called generalised Veltman semantics. In the recent years and especially during the writing of this thesis, generalised Veltman semantics was shown to be particularly well-suited as a relational semantics for interpretability logics. In particular, modal completeness results are easier to obtain in some cases; and decidability can be proven via filtration in all known cases. We prove various new and reprove some old completeness results with respect to the generalised semantics. We use the method of filtration to obtain the finite model property for various logics. Apart from results concerning semantics in its own right, we also apply methods from semantics to determine decidability (implied by the finite model property) and complexity of provability (and consistency) problems for certain interpretability logics. From the arithmetical standpoint, we explore three different series of interpretability principles. For two of them, for which arithmetical and modal soundness was already known, we give a new proof of arithmetical soundness. The third series results from our modal considerations. We prove it arithmetically sound and also characterise frame conditions w.r.t. ordinary Veltman semantics. We also prove results concerning the new series and generalised Veltman semantics. Abstract prepared by Luka Mikec. E-mail: luka.mikec1@gmail.com URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/177373
摘要研究形式化相对可解释性的各种性质。本文的中心部分研究了不同可解释性逻辑的模态语义完备性、可判决性和算法复杂度。特别地,我们研究了可解释性逻辑的两种基本类型的关系语义。一种是维尔特曼语义学,我们称之为规则语义学或普通语义学;另一种叫做广义维特曼语义。近年来,特别是在撰写本文期间,广义Veltman语义被证明特别适合作为可解释性逻辑的关系语义。特别是,在某些情况下,模态完备性结果更容易得到;可决性可以通过过滤在所有已知的情况下证明。我们证明了一些关于广义语义的新的完备性结果,并对一些旧的完备性结果进行了修正。我们用过滤的方法得到了各种逻辑的有限模型性质。除了关于语义本身的结果外,我们还应用语义的方法来确定某些可解释性逻辑的可判决性(由有限模型性质隐含)和可证明性(和一致性)问题的复杂性。从算术的角度出发,我们探讨了三种不同的可解释性原则。对于其中两个已知算术和模态稳健性的矩阵,给出了一个新的算术稳健性证明。第三个系列是由模态考虑得出的。我们证明了它在算术上是合理的,并利用普通的Veltman语义刻画了框架条件。我们还证明了关于新级数和广义Veltman语义的结果。摘要由Luka Mikec准备。电子邮件:luka.mikec1@gmail.com URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/177373
{"title":"On Logics and Semantics for Interpretability","authors":"Luka Mikec","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.3","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study various properties of formalised relativised interpretability. In the central part of this thesis we study for different interpretability logics the following aspects: completeness for modal semantics, decidability and algorithmic complexity. In particular, we study two basic types of relational semantics for interpretability logics. One is the Veltman semantics, which we shall refer to as the regular or ordinary semantics; the other is called generalised Veltman semantics. In the recent years and especially during the writing of this thesis, generalised Veltman semantics was shown to be particularly well-suited as a relational semantics for interpretability logics. In particular, modal completeness results are easier to obtain in some cases; and decidability can be proven via filtration in all known cases. We prove various new and reprove some old completeness results with respect to the generalised semantics. We use the method of filtration to obtain the finite model property for various logics. Apart from results concerning semantics in its own right, we also apply methods from semantics to determine decidability (implied by the finite model property) and complexity of provability (and consistency) problems for certain interpretability logics. From the arithmetical standpoint, we explore three different series of interpretability principles. For two of them, for which arithmetical and modal soundness was already known, we give a new proof of arithmetical soundness. The third series results from our modal considerations. We prove it arithmetically sound and also characterise frame conditions w.r.t. ordinary Veltman semantics. We also prove results concerning the new series and generalised Veltman semantics. Abstract prepared by Luka Mikec. E-mail: luka.mikec1@gmail.com URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/177373","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73103559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
P-points, MAD families and Cardinal Invariants p点、MAD族与基数不变量
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2021.24
Osvaldo Guzmán González
Abstract The main topics of this thesis are cardinal invariants, P -points and MAD families. Cardinal invariants of the continuum are cardinal numbers that are bigger than $aleph _{0}$ and smaller or equal than $mathfrak {c}.$ Of course, they are only interesting when they have some combinatorial or topological definition. An almost disjoint family is a family of infinite subsets of $omega $ such that the intersection of any two of its elements is finite. A MAD family is a maximal almost disjoint family. An ultrafilter $mathcal {U}$ on $omega $ is called a P-point if every countable $mathcal {Bsubseteq U}$ there is $Xin $ $mathcal {U}$ such that $Xsetminus B$ is finite for every $Bin mathcal {B}.$ This kind of ultrafilters has been extensively studied, however there is still a large number of open questions about them. In the preliminaries we recall the principal properties of filters, ultrafilters, ideals, MAD families and cardinal invariants of the continuum. We present the construction of Shelah, Mildenberger, Raghavan, and Steprāns of a completely separable MAD family under $mathfrak {sleq a}.$ None of the results in this chapter are due to the author. The second chapter is dedicated to a principle of Sierpiński. The principle $left ( ast right ) $ of Sierpiński is the following statement: There is a family of functions $left { varphi _{n}:omega _{1}longrightarrow omega _{1}mid nin omega right } $ such that for every $Iin left [ omega _{1}right ] ^{omega _{1}}$ there is $nin omega $ for which $varphi _{n}left [ Iright ] =omega _{1}.$ This principle was recently studied by Arnie Miller. He showed that this principle is equivalent to the following statement: There is a set $X=left { f_{alpha }mid alpha alpha $ then $f_{beta }cap g$ is infinite (sets with that property are referred to as $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin sets ). Miller showed that the principle of Sierpiński implies that non $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}.$ He asked if the converse was true, i.e., does non $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ imply the principle $left ( ast right ) $ of Sierpiński? We answer his question affirmatively. In other words, we show that non $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ is enough to construct an $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin set. It is not hard to see that the $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin set we constructed is meager. This is no coincidence, because with the aid of an inaccessible cardinal, we construct a model where non $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ and every $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin set is meager. The third chapter is dedicated to a conjecture of Hrušák. Michael Hrušák conjectured the following: Every Borel cardinal invariant is either at most non $left ( mathcal {M}right ) $ or at least cov $left ( mathcal {M}right ) $ (it is known that the definability
摘要本文主要讨论基数不变量、P点和MAD族。连续统的基数不变量是大于 $aleph _{0}$ 小于或等于 $mathfrak {c}.$ 当然,只有当它们有一些组合或拓扑定义时,它们才有趣。几乎不相交族是由无穷个子集组成的族 $omega $ 使得任意两个元素的交点是有限的。MAD家族是一个极大的几乎不相交的家族。超滤机 $mathcal {U}$ on $omega $ 称为p点,如果每个可数 $mathcal {Bsubseteq U}$ 有 $Xin $ $mathcal {U}$ 这样 $Xsetminus B$ 是有限的 $Bin mathcal {B}.$ 这种超滤材料已经得到了广泛的研究,但仍有大量的问题有待解决。在序言中,我们回顾了滤光器、超滤光器、理想、MAD族和连续体的基本不变量的主要性质。我们提出了一个完全可分离的MAD家族的Shelah, Mildenberger, Raghavan和Steprāns的构建 $mathfrak {sleq a}.$ 本章的结果都不是作者的功劳。第二章论述了Sierpiński的原理。原理 $left ( ast right ) $ Sierpiński的表达式如下:有一个函数族 $left { varphi _{n}:omega _{1}longrightarrow omega _{1}mid nin omega right } $ 这样对于每一个 $Iin left [ omega _{1}right ] ^{omega _{1}}$ 有 $nin omega $ 为了什么? $varphi _{n}left [ Iright ] =omega _{1}.$ 阿尼·米勒最近研究了这个原理。他证明了这个原理等价于下面的陈述:有一个集合 $X=left { f_{alpha }mid alpha alpha $ 然后 $f_{beta }cap g$ 具有该属性的无限集是否被称为 $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin sets)。米勒表明Sierpiński原理暗示了非 $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}.$ 他问反之是否为真,即否 $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ 隐含原则 $left ( ast right ) $ Sierpiński?我们肯定地回答他的问题。换句话说,我们证明了非 $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ 足够构造一个吗 $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin set。不难看出, $mathcal {IE}$ -我们建造的luzin布景很简陋。这不是巧合,因为借助不可接近的基数,我们构建了一个模型 $left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$ 每一个 $mathcal {IE}$ -Luzin设置是贫乏的。第三章是关于Hrušák的一个猜想。Michael Hrušák推测如下:每个Borel基本不变量要么最多是非 $left ( mathcal {M}right ) $ 或者至少是cov $left ( mathcal {M}right ) $ (众所周知,可定义性是一个重要的要求,否则 $mathfrak {a}$ 这是一个反例)。虽然这个猜想的准确性仍然是一个开放的问题,但我们能够得到一些部分结果:对于的Borel不变量,这个猜想是假的 $omega _{1}^{omega }$ 然而,对于一大类可定义不变量,它是成立的。这是Michael Hrušák和Jindřich Zapletal共同工作的一部分。第四章对理想与MAD家庭的可破坏性进行了考察。我们证明了几个经典定理,但我们也证明了一些新的结果。例如,我们展示了每一个大小小于 $mathfrak {c}$ 是否可以延伸到一个科恩坚不可摧的MAD家族 $mathfrak {b=c}$ (这是与Michael Hrušák、Ariet Ramos和Carlos Martínez共同工作的一部分)。疯狂的家庭 $mathcal {A}$ 是Shelah-Steprāns if for every $Xsubseteq left [ omega right ] ^{<omega }setminus left { emptyset right } $ 要么有 $Ain mathcal {I}left ( mathcal {A}right ) $ 这样 $scap Aneq emptyset $ 对于每一个 $sin X$ 或者有 $Bin mathcal {I}left ( mathcal {A}right ) $ 它包含无穷多个X的元素(其中 $mathcal {I}left ( mathcal {A}right ) $ 表示由生成的理想 $mathcal {A}$ ). 这个概念是由Raghavan提出的,它与Shelah和Steprāns提出的“强可分离”概念有关。我们证明Shelah-Steprāns MAD族具有很强的不可摧毁性:Shelah-Steprāns MAD族对于“许多”不加支配实数的可定义力是不可摧毁的(这一陈述将在第四章形式化)。据作者所知,这是迄今为止文献中考虑过的最强有力的概念(就不可摧毁性而言)。尽管它们具有强大的不可摧毁性,Shelah-Steprāns MAD家庭可以被一种不增加不分裂或主导现实的ccc强迫所摧毁。
{"title":"P-points, MAD families and Cardinal Invariants","authors":"Osvaldo Guzmán González","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.24","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The main topics of this thesis are cardinal invariants, P -points and MAD families. Cardinal invariants of the continuum are cardinal numbers that are bigger than \u0000$aleph _{0}$\u0000 and smaller or equal than \u0000$mathfrak {c}.$\u0000 Of course, they are only interesting when they have some combinatorial or topological definition. An almost disjoint family is a family of infinite subsets of \u0000$omega $\u0000 such that the intersection of any two of its elements is finite. A MAD family is a maximal almost disjoint family. An ultrafilter \u0000$mathcal {U}$\u0000 on \u0000$omega $\u0000 is called a P-point if every countable \u0000$mathcal {Bsubseteq U}$\u0000 there is \u0000$Xin $\u0000 \u0000$mathcal {U}$\u0000 such that \u0000$Xsetminus B$\u0000 is finite for every \u0000$Bin mathcal {B}.$\u0000 This kind of ultrafilters has been extensively studied, however there is still a large number of open questions about them. In the preliminaries we recall the principal properties of filters, ultrafilters, ideals, MAD families and cardinal invariants of the continuum. We present the construction of Shelah, Mildenberger, Raghavan, and Steprāns of a completely separable MAD family under \u0000$mathfrak {sleq a}.$\u0000 None of the results in this chapter are due to the author. The second chapter is dedicated to a principle of Sierpiński. The principle \u0000$left ( ast right ) $\u0000 of Sierpiński is the following statement: There is a family of functions \u0000$left { varphi _{n}:omega _{1}longrightarrow omega _{1}mid nin omega right } $\u0000 such that for every \u0000$Iin left [ omega _{1}right ] ^{omega _{1}}$\u0000 there is \u0000$nin omega $\u0000 for which \u0000$varphi _{n}left [ Iright ] =omega _{1}.$\u0000 This principle was recently studied by Arnie Miller. He showed that this principle is equivalent to the following statement: There is a set \u0000$X=left { f_{alpha }mid alpha <omega _{1}right } subseteq omega ^{omega }$\u0000 such that for every \u0000$g:omega longrightarrow omega $\u0000 there is \u0000$alpha $\u0000 such that if \u0000$beta>alpha $\u0000 then \u0000$f_{beta }cap g$\u0000 is infinite (sets with that property are referred to as \u0000$mathcal {IE}$\u0000 -Luzin sets ). Miller showed that the principle of Sierpiński implies that non \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}.$\u0000 He asked if the converse was true, i.e., does non \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$\u0000 imply the principle \u0000$left ( ast right ) $\u0000 of Sierpiński? We answer his question affirmatively. In other words, we show that non \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$\u0000 is enough to construct an \u0000$mathcal {IE}$\u0000 -Luzin set. It is not hard to see that the \u0000$mathcal {IE}$\u0000 -Luzin set we constructed is meager. This is no coincidence, because with the aid of an inaccessible cardinal, we construct a model where non \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) =omega _{1}$\u0000 and every \u0000$mathcal {IE}$\u0000 -Luzin set is meager. The third chapter is dedicated to a conjecture of Hrušák. Michael Hrušák conjectured the following: Every Borel cardinal invariant is either at most non \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) $\u0000 or at least cov \u0000$left ( mathcal {M}right ) $\u0000 (it is known that the definability","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84710475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BSL volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Front matter BSL第28卷第2期封面和封面问题
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.20
{"title":"BSL volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74258274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BSL volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Back matter BSL第28卷第2期封面和封底
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.21
{"title":"BSL volume 28 issue 2 Cover and Back matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.21","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88836047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Combinatorics and Absoluteness of Definable Sets of Real Numbers 实数可定义集的组合性与绝对性
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2021.55
Zach Norwood
Abstract This thesis divides naturally into two parts, each concerned with the extent to which the theory of $L(mathbf {R})$ can be changed by forcing. The first part focuses primarily on applying generic-absoluteness principles to how that definable sets of reals enjoy regularity properties. The work in Part I is joint with Itay Neeman and is adapted from our paper Happy and mad families in $L(mathbf {R})$ , JSL, 2018. The project was motivated by questions about mad families, maximal families of infinite subsets of $omega $ of which any two have only finitely many members in common. We begin, in the spirit of Mathias, by establishing (Theorem 2.8) a strong Ramsey property for sets of reals in the Solovay model, giving a new proof of Törnquist’s theorem that there are no infinite mad families in the Solovay model. In Chapter 3 we stray from the main line of inquiry to briefly study a game-theoretic characterization of filters with the Baire Property. Neeman and Zapletal showed, assuming roughly the existence of a proper class of Woodin cardinals, that the boldface theory of $L(mathbf {R})$ cannot be changed by proper forcing. They call their result the Embedding Theorem, because they conclude that in fact there is an elementary embedding from the $L(mathbf {R})$ of the ground model to that of the proper forcing extension. With a view toward analyzing mad families under $mathsf {AD}^+$ and in $L(mathbf {R})$ under large-cardinal hypotheses, in Chapter 4 we establish triangular versions of the Embedding Theorem. These are enough for us to use Mathias’s methods to show (Theorem 4.5) that there are no infinite mad families in $L(mathbf {R})$ under large cardinals and (Theorem 4.9) that $mathsf {AD}^+$ implies that there are no infinite mad families. These are again corollaries of theorems about strong Ramsey properties under large-cardinal assumptions and $mathsf {AD}^+$ , respectively. Our first theorem improves the large-cardinal assumption under which Todorcevic established the nonexistence of infinite mad families in $L(mathbf {R})$ . Part I concludes with Chapter 5, a short list of open questions. In the second part of the thesis, we undertake a finer analysis of the Embedding Theorem and its consistency strength. Schindler found that the the Embedding Theorem is consistent relative to much weaker assumptions than the existence of Woodin cardinals. He defined remarkable cardinals, which can exist even in L, and showed that the Embedding Theorem is equiconsistent with the existence of a remarkable cardinal. His theorem resembles a theorem of Harrington–Shelah and Kunen from the 1980s: the absoluteness of the theory of $L(mathbf {R})$ to ccc forcing extensions is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal. Joint with Itay Neeman, we improve Schindler’s theorem by showing that absoluteness for $sigma $ -closed $ast $ ccc posets—instead of the larger class of proper posets—implies the remarkability of $aleph _1^V$ i
本文自然分为两部分,每一部分都涉及$L(mathbf {R})$理论在多大程度上可以被强迫改变。第一部分主要关注于将泛型绝对原理应用于可定义实数集如何享有正则性。第一部分的工作是与Itay Neeman合作,改编自我们在$L(mathbf {R})$, JSL, 2018年的论文《快乐与疯狂的家庭》。这个项目的动机是关于疯狂家庭的问题,疯狂家庭是$omega $的无限子集的最大家庭,其中任何两个都只有有限的共同成员。我们以Mathias的精神开始,通过建立(定理2.8)Solovay模型中实数集的强Ramsey性质,给出Törnquist定理的新证明,即Solovay模型中不存在无限的疯狂族。在第三章中,我们偏离了研究的主线,简单地研究了具有贝尔性质的滤波器的博弈论表征。Neeman和Zapletal在大致假设存在一种合适的伍丁基数的情况下,证明了$L(mathbf {R})$的黑体字理论不能通过适当的强迫来改变。他们把他们的结果称为嵌入定理,因为他们得出结论,事实上,从地面模型的$L(mathbf {R})$到固有强迫扩展的存在一个初等嵌入。为了分析在$mathsf {AD}^+$和$L(mathbf {R})$大基数假设下的疯狂家庭,在第四章中我们建立了嵌入定理的三角版本。这些足以让我们使用Mathias的方法来证明(定理4.5)在$L(mathbf {R})$中在大基数下不存在无限的疯狂族,并且(定理4.9)$mathsf {AD}^+$暗示不存在无限的疯狂族。这些分别是在大基数假设和$mathsf {AD}^+$下关于强拉姆齐性质的定理的推论。我们的第一个定理改进了托多切维奇在$L(mathbf {R})$中建立无限疯狂家族不存在的大基数假设。第一部分以第5章结束,这是一个简短的开放性问题列表。在论文的第二部分,我们对嵌入定理及其一致性强度进行了更细致的分析。Schindler发现,相对于Woodin基数的存在,嵌入定理在更弱的假设下是一致的。他定义了即使在L中也可以存在的显著基数,并证明了嵌入定理与显著基数的存在是等价的。他的定理类似于20世纪80年代哈林顿-希拉和库宁的定理:$L(mathbf {R})$对ccc强迫扩展理论的绝对性与弱紧致基数是等价的。与Itay Neeman一起,我们改进了Schindler定理,证明了$sigma $ -闭$ast $ - ccc集的绝对性——而不是更大的适当集的绝对性——暗示了$aleph _1^V$在l中的显著性。这需要对证明进行根本的改变,因为Schindler的下界论证使用了Jensen的重塑强迫,尽管正确,但在这种情况下不一定是$sigma $ -闭$ast $ - ccc。我们的证据更像哈林顿-希拉的证据,而不是辛德勒的证据。定理6.2的证明自然地分成两个论证。在第7章中,我们将Harrington-Shelah编码实数的方法扩展到一个专门化函数中,以允许不属于l的不可数层次的树。这在定理7.4中达到高潮,它断言如果存在$Xsubseteq omega _1$和高度为$omega _1$的树$Tsubseteq omega _1$,使得X可以沿着T编码(见定义7.3),那么ccc posets的$L(mathbf {R})$ -绝对性必须失败。我们在第8章中完成了这个论证,在第8章中,我们证明了如果在V的任何$sigma $ -闭扩展中没有沿树T的$Xsubseteq omega _1$可编码,那么$aleph _1^V$在l中一定是显著的。在第9章中,我们从一个显著的基础上回顾了Schindler的一般绝对性证明,证明了该论证给出了一个逐层上界:对于与$lambda $相关的适当集,一个强烈的$lambda ^+$ -显著基数足以获得$L(mathbf {R})$ -绝对性。第10章致力于部分地反转第9章的逐级上界。采用Neeman, Hierarchies of forcing公理II的方法,我们能够证明$left |mathbf {R}right |cdot left |lambda right |$ -链接偏序集的$L(mathbf {R})$ -绝对性意味着区间$[aleph _1^V,lambda ]$在l中是$Sigma ^2_1$ -显著的。电子邮件:zachnorwood@gmail.com
{"title":"The Combinatorics and Absoluteness of Definable Sets of Real Numbers","authors":"Zach Norwood","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.55","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.55","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This thesis divides naturally into two parts, each concerned with the extent to which the theory of \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 can be changed by forcing. The first part focuses primarily on applying generic-absoluteness principles to how that definable sets of reals enjoy regularity properties. The work in Part I is joint with Itay Neeman and is adapted from our paper Happy and mad families in \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 , JSL, 2018. The project was motivated by questions about mad families, maximal families of infinite subsets of \u0000$omega $\u0000 of which any two have only finitely many members in common. We begin, in the spirit of Mathias, by establishing (Theorem 2.8) a strong Ramsey property for sets of reals in the Solovay model, giving a new proof of Törnquist’s theorem that there are no infinite mad families in the Solovay model. In Chapter 3 we stray from the main line of inquiry to briefly study a game-theoretic characterization of filters with the Baire Property. Neeman and Zapletal showed, assuming roughly the existence of a proper class of Woodin cardinals, that the boldface theory of \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 cannot be changed by proper forcing. They call their result the Embedding Theorem, because they conclude that in fact there is an elementary embedding from the \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 of the ground model to that of the proper forcing extension. With a view toward analyzing mad families under \u0000$mathsf {AD}^+$\u0000 and in \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 under large-cardinal hypotheses, in Chapter 4 we establish triangular versions of the Embedding Theorem. These are enough for us to use Mathias’s methods to show (Theorem 4.5) that there are no infinite mad families in \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 under large cardinals and (Theorem 4.9) that \u0000$mathsf {AD}^+$\u0000 implies that there are no infinite mad families. These are again corollaries of theorems about strong Ramsey properties under large-cardinal assumptions and \u0000$mathsf {AD}^+$\u0000 , respectively. Our first theorem improves the large-cardinal assumption under which Todorcevic established the nonexistence of infinite mad families in \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 . Part I concludes with Chapter 5, a short list of open questions. In the second part of the thesis, we undertake a finer analysis of the Embedding Theorem and its consistency strength. Schindler found that the the Embedding Theorem is consistent relative to much weaker assumptions than the existence of Woodin cardinals. He defined remarkable cardinals, which can exist even in L, and showed that the Embedding Theorem is equiconsistent with the existence of a remarkable cardinal. His theorem resembles a theorem of Harrington–Shelah and Kunen from the 1980s: the absoluteness of the theory of \u0000$L(mathbf {R})$\u0000 to ccc forcing extensions is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal. Joint with Itay Neeman, we improve Schindler’s theorem by showing that absoluteness for \u0000$sigma $\u0000 -closed \u0000$ast $\u0000 ccc posets—instead of the larger class of proper posets—implies the remarkability of \u0000$aleph _1^V$\u0000 i","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82917812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
THE AXIOM OF CHOICE IS FALSE INTUITIONISTICALLY (IN MOST CONTEXTS) 选择公理在直觉上是错误的(在大多数情况下)
Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.22
C. McCarty, S. Shapiro, A. Klev
Abstract There seems to be a view that intuitionists not only take the Axiom of Choice (AC) to be true, but also believe it a consequence of their fundamental posits. Widespread or not, this view is largely mistaken. This article offers a brief, yet comprehensive, overview of the status of AC in various intuitionistic and constructivist systems. The survey makes it clear that the Axiom of Choice fails to be a theorem in most contexts and is even outright false in some important contexts. Of the systems surveyed, only intensional type theory renders AC a theorem, but the extent of AC in that theory does not include, for instance, real analysis. Only a small amount of extensionality is required in order for the obvious proof an intuitionist might offer for AC to break down.
似乎有一种观点认为,直觉主义者不仅认为选择公理(AC)是正确的,而且认为这是他们基本假设的结果。不管是否普遍,这种观点在很大程度上是错误的。本文简要而全面地概述了交流在各种直觉主义和建构主义体系中的地位。调查清楚地表明,选择公理在大多数情况下不能成为定理,在一些重要的情况下甚至是完全错误的。在所调查的系统中,只有内涵类型理论使AC成为定理,但该理论中AC的范围不包括,例如,实分析。只需要少量的延伸性,直觉主义者就可以提供AC失效的明显证据。
{"title":"THE AXIOM OF CHOICE IS FALSE INTUITIONISTICALLY (IN MOST CONTEXTS)","authors":"C. McCarty, S. Shapiro, A. Klev","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.22","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There seems to be a view that intuitionists not only take the Axiom of Choice (AC) to be true, but also believe it a consequence of their fundamental posits. Widespread or not, this view is largely mistaken. This article offers a brief, yet comprehensive, overview of the status of AC in various intuitionistic and constructivist systems. The survey makes it clear that the Axiom of Choice fails to be a theorem in most contexts and is even outright false in some important contexts. Of the systems surveyed, only intensional type theory renders AC a theorem, but the extent of AC in that theory does not include, for instance, real analysis. Only a small amount of extensionality is required in order for the obvious proof an intuitionist might offer for AC to break down.","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88666047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ORDER TYPES OF MODELS OF FRAGMENTS OF PEANO ARITHMETIC 皮诺算法片段模型的顺序类型
Pub Date : 2022-04-27 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2021.48
L. Galeotti, B. Löwe
Abstract The complete characterisation of order types of non-standard models of Peano arithmetic and its extensions is a famous open problem. In this paper, we consider subtheories of Peano arithmetic (both with and without induction), in particular, theories formulated in proper fragments of the full language of arithmetic. We study the order types of their non-standard models and separate all considered theories via their possible order types. We compare the theories with and without induction and observe that the theories without induction tend to have an algebraic character that allows model constructions by closing a model under the relevant algebraic operations.
Peano算法及其扩展的非标准模型阶型的完全刻画是一个著名的开放问题。在本文中,我们考虑了Peano算术的子理论(包括带归纳和不带归纳),特别是用完整算术语言的适当片段表述的理论。我们研究了它们的非标准模型的阶型,并通过它们可能的阶型来分离所有被考虑的理论。我们比较了有归纳和没有归纳的理论,并观察到没有归纳的理论往往具有代数特征,允许在相关代数操作下通过关闭模型来构建模型。
{"title":"ORDER TYPES OF MODELS OF FRAGMENTS OF PEANO ARITHMETIC","authors":"L. Galeotti, B. Löwe","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2021.48","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2021.48","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The complete characterisation of order types of non-standard models of Peano arithmetic and its extensions is a famous open problem. In this paper, we consider subtheories of Peano arithmetic (both with and without induction), in particular, theories formulated in proper fragments of the full language of arithmetic. We study the order types of their non-standard models and separate all considered theories via their possible order types. We compare the theories with and without induction and observe that the theories without induction tend to have an algebraic character that allows model constructions by closing a model under the relevant algebraic operations.","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88557675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO FORCING IN A GENERAL SETTING 在一般情况下对强迫的一种公理化的方法
Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.15
R. A. Freire, P. Holy
Abstract The technique of forcing is almost ubiquitous in set theory, and it seems to be based on technicalities like the concepts of genericity, forcing names and their evaluations, and on the recursively defined forcing predicates, the definition of which is particularly intricate for the basic case of atomic first order formulas. In his [3], the first author has provided an axiomatic framework for set forcing over models of $mathrm {ZFC}$ that is a collection of guiding principles for extensions over which one still has control from the ground model, and has shown that these axiomatics necessarily lead to the usual concepts of genericity and of forcing extensions, and also that one can infer from them the usual recursive definition of forcing predicates. In this paper, we present a more general such approach, covering both class forcing and set forcing, over various base theories, and we provide additional details regarding the formal setting that was outlined in [3].
强迫技术在集合理论中几乎无处不在,它似乎是基于泛型概念、强迫名称及其求值等技术,以及递归定义的强迫谓词,其定义对于原子一阶公式的基本情况尤其复杂。在他的[3]中,第一作者为$ mathm {ZFC}$模型上的集合强迫提供了一个公理框架,该框架是一组仍然可以从基础模型控制的扩展指导原则的集合,并表明这些公理必然导致一般的泛型和强迫扩展的概念,并且人们可以从中推断出强迫谓词的通常递归定义。在本文中,我们提出了一种更一般的方法,涵盖了各种基本理论的类强制和集强制,并提供了关于[3]中概述的正式设置的额外细节。
{"title":"AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH TO FORCING IN A GENERAL SETTING","authors":"R. A. Freire, P. Holy","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.15","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The technique of forcing is almost ubiquitous in set theory, and it seems to be based on technicalities like the concepts of genericity, forcing names and their evaluations, and on the recursively defined forcing predicates, the definition of which is particularly intricate for the basic case of atomic first order formulas. In his [3], the first author has provided an axiomatic framework for set forcing over models of \u0000$mathrm {ZFC}$\u0000 that is a collection of guiding principles for extensions over which one still has control from the ground model, and has shown that these axiomatics necessarily lead to the usual concepts of genericity and of forcing extensions, and also that one can infer from them the usual recursive definition of forcing predicates. In this paper, we present a more general such approach, covering both class forcing and set forcing, over various base theories, and we provide additional details regarding the formal setting that was outlined in [3].","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78090856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IN MEMORIAM: GERALD E. SACKS, 1933–2019 纪念:杰拉尔德·e·萨克斯,1933-2019
Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.8
M. Lerman, T. Slaman
Gerald E. Sacks, age 86, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Harvard and M.I.T., passed away at his home in Falmouth, Maine, after a long illness. Sacks was born in Brooklyn and graduated from Brooklyn Technical High School. He initially was an engineering major, but interrupted his college studies at Cornell University to serve in the U.S. Army from 1953 to 1956. After returning to Cornell, he developed an interest in Mathematical Logic and continued his studies in that area, receiving his Ph.D. in 1961 as a student of J. Barclay Rosser. He began his academic career at Cornell University, but moved to M.I.T. in 1966, and later accepted a joint appointment at M.I.T. and Harvard. During his career, he held visiting positions at The Institute for Advanced Study and several prestigious universities. Sacks had a brilliant mind for Mathematics and an abiding curiosity about it. In addition, he had a magnetic personality, and was always a center of attention. He was a captivating speaker, and a witty and deep thinker. His knowledge and interests were broad, covering not only his field of expertise but also the major developments in mathematics as a whole and in the world at large. His interests were varied; he enjoyed reading and had an extensive library, wrote poetry, and was a movie buff with a fantastic recall of highlights of movies. He gave willingly of his time and encouragement to his students, colleagues, and friends, and that encouragement frequently bore fruit. One cannot overestimate the effect he had on his main area of interest, Computability Theory, not only through his innovative work, but also through the work of his more than 30 students and more than 750 mathematical descendents. Sacks began his work in Classical Computability Theory when the field was in its infancy. Kleene and Post had begun the study of degrees of unsolvability, or Turing degrees, and Post the study of the computably enumerable Turing degrees. The results of Friedberg and independently Muchnik (incomparable computably enumerable Turing degrees) and Spector (minimal degrees) stimulated interest in the area. But it was the pioneering work of Sacks in his monograph, Degrees of Unsolvability [1] that generated an exhaustive study of those degrees. Sacks’ work in that monograph covered many aspects of degree theory, and his innovative techniques produced several theorems that bear his name. Moreover, the importance of the results was equalled by the importance of the techniques he introduced. The degrees of unsolvability form an algebraic structure that provides a measure of the complexity of information inherent in an oracle attached
杰拉尔德·e·萨克斯,86岁,哈佛大学和麻省理工学院数学荣誉教授,在长期患病后,在缅因州法尔茅斯的家中去世。萨克斯出生在布鲁克林,毕业于布鲁克林技术高中。他最初主修工程学,但中断了他在康奈尔大学的大学学业,于1953年至1956年在美国陆军服役。回到康奈尔大学后,他对数理逻辑产生了兴趣,并继续在该领域的研究,1961年作为J. Barclay Rosser的学生获得博士学位。他的学术生涯始于康奈尔大学,1966年转到麻省理工学院,后来接受了麻省理工学院和哈佛大学的联合聘用。在他的职业生涯中,他曾在高级研究所和几所著名大学担任访问职位。萨克斯对数学有着杰出的头脑和持久的好奇心。此外,他的个性很有吸引力,总是人们关注的焦点。他是一位引人入胜的演说家,也是一位机智而深刻的思想家。他的知识和兴趣广泛,不仅涵盖了他的专业领域,而且涵盖了整个数学和世界上的主要发展。他的兴趣是多种多样的;他喜欢阅读,藏书丰富,写诗,还是个电影迷,对电影的精彩片段有着惊人的记忆。他乐于为他的学生、同事和朋友付出时间和鼓励,这种鼓励经常结出果实。他不仅通过他的创新工作,而且通过他的30多名学生和750多名数学后代的工作,对他的主要兴趣领域——可计算性理论——产生了不可估量的影响。萨克斯开始研究经典可计算理论时,该领域还处于起步阶段。克莱因和波斯特开始研究不可解度,也就是图灵度,而波斯特开始研究可计算的图灵度。弗里德伯格和穆奇尼克(不可比拟的可计算的图灵度)和斯佩克特(最小度)的结果激发了人们对这一领域的兴趣。但是,萨克斯在他的专著《不可解度》(Degrees of Unsolvability)中的开创性工作[1]引发了对这些度的详尽研究。萨克斯在那本专著中的工作涵盖了学位理论的许多方面,他的创新技术产生了几个以他的名字命名的定理。此外,他所介绍的技术的重要性与结果的重要性相当。不可解的程度形成了一个代数结构,它提供了附加的oracle中固有信息复杂性的度量
{"title":"IN MEMORIAM: GERALD E. SACKS, 1933–2019","authors":"M. Lerman, T. Slaman","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.8","url":null,"abstract":"Gerald E. Sacks, age 86, Professor Emeritus of Mathematics at Harvard and M.I.T., passed away at his home in Falmouth, Maine, after a long illness. Sacks was born in Brooklyn and graduated from Brooklyn Technical High School. He initially was an engineering major, but interrupted his college studies at Cornell University to serve in the U.S. Army from 1953 to 1956. After returning to Cornell, he developed an interest in Mathematical Logic and continued his studies in that area, receiving his Ph.D. in 1961 as a student of J. Barclay Rosser. He began his academic career at Cornell University, but moved to M.I.T. in 1966, and later accepted a joint appointment at M.I.T. and Harvard. During his career, he held visiting positions at The Institute for Advanced Study and several prestigious universities. Sacks had a brilliant mind for Mathematics and an abiding curiosity about it. In addition, he had a magnetic personality, and was always a center of attention. He was a captivating speaker, and a witty and deep thinker. His knowledge and interests were broad, covering not only his field of expertise but also the major developments in mathematics as a whole and in the world at large. His interests were varied; he enjoyed reading and had an extensive library, wrote poetry, and was a movie buff with a fantastic recall of highlights of movies. He gave willingly of his time and encouragement to his students, colleagues, and friends, and that encouragement frequently bore fruit. One cannot overestimate the effect he had on his main area of interest, Computability Theory, not only through his innovative work, but also through the work of his more than 30 students and more than 750 mathematical descendents. Sacks began his work in Classical Computability Theory when the field was in its infancy. Kleene and Post had begun the study of degrees of unsolvability, or Turing degrees, and Post the study of the computably enumerable Turing degrees. The results of Friedberg and independently Muchnik (incomparable computably enumerable Turing degrees) and Spector (minimal degrees) stimulated interest in the area. But it was the pioneering work of Sacks in his monograph, Degrees of Unsolvability [1] that generated an exhaustive study of those degrees. Sacks’ work in that monograph covered many aspects of degree theory, and his innovative techniques produced several theorems that bear his name. Moreover, the importance of the results was equalled by the importance of the techniques he introduced. The degrees of unsolvability form an algebraic structure that provides a measure of the complexity of information inherent in an oracle attached","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75286896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
BSL volume 28 issue 1 Cover and Front matter BSL第28卷第1期封面和封面问题
Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1017/bsl.2022.10
{"title":"BSL volume 28 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.10","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72930013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1