{"title":"Key Names Published in Volume 79 (2022)","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88482667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E. J. van Nieukerken, O. Karsholt, Richard L. Brown, Maria Heikkilä, P. Huemer, L. Kaila, J. Landry, Houhun Li, M. Ponomarenko, S. Sinev
Abstract The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to suppress the little-used senior family-group name Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845, in order to conserve the well-known family group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883 (both in Lepidoptera). Both the name Epigraphiidae and its derivatives have been seldom used, with about eleven known uses since 1900, in contrast to its junior synonym Depressariidae.
摘要:根据《昆虫法典》第23.9.3条的规定，本申请的目的是压制很少使用的高级科群名称Epigraphiidae guen e, 1845，以保留众所周知的科群名称抑制剂ariidae Meyrick, 1883(均在鳞翅目中)。Epigraphiidae和它的衍生物都很少被使用，自1900年以来大约有11个已知的用法，与它的低级同义词depresariidae形成对比。
{"title":"Case 3841 – Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845 (Lepidoptera, Gelechioidea): proposed suppression to conserve the widely used family-group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883","authors":"E. J. van Nieukerken, O. Karsholt, Richard L. Brown, Maria Heikkilä, P. Huemer, L. Kaila, J. Landry, Houhun Li, M. Ponomarenko, S. Sinev","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a008","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to suppress the little-used senior family-group name Epigraphiidae Guenée, 1845, in order to conserve the well-known family group name Depressariidae Meyrick, 1883 (both in Lepidoptera). Both the name Epigraphiidae and its derivatives have been seldom used, with about eleven known uses since 1900, in contrast to its junior synonym Depressariidae.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78841784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Recent work on trematode parasites of freshwater fishes has shown that, if the Law of Priority is strictly applied, the species commonly known as Rhipidocotyle illensis (Ziegler, 1883) Vejnar, 1956, must be known as R. polymorphus (Baer, 1827) and the forgotten name Gasterostomum fimbriatum Siebold, 1848 must be applied to the species widely known as Bucephalus polymorphus Baer, 1827. At the same time, the well known generic name Rhipidocotyle Diesing, 1858 must fall as a synonym of Bucephalus Baer, 1827, and the forgotten name Gasterostomum Siebold, 1848 must be revived for the genus known at present as Bucephalus. The Commission is asked to take the necessary steps to prevent these changes being made. In European freshwater fishes there are two common species of trematodes of the family BUCEPHALIDAE, known as Bucephalus polymorphus, Baer, 1827 and Rhipidocotyle illensis (Ziegler, 1883) Vejnar, 1956. It has been SLSsnmtd iv2^. Bucephalus polymorphus develops from the cercaria described under this name by Baer in 1827, but the cercaria of the trematode now known by that name has not yet been described, although it was figured by Kinkelin(1968). 2. While studying the biology of these two species, both of which occur in Poland, I examined bivalves (the first intermediate host), cyprinid fishes (the second intermediate host) and predatory fishes (the definitive host); I found two different cercariae from which I experimentally obtained metacercariae of two species, but the metacercaria oi Rhipidocotyle illensis developed from cercariae identical with those described hy ^ditr diS Bucephalus polymorphus. Detailed data on the morphology of all developmental stages can be found in Baturo (1977). 3. As a result of this study it has become necessary to set in order the names of these two species of Trematoda. For stability of nomenclature it is necessary to maintain the names commonly used Bull. zool. Nomencl. vol. 36, part 1 , July 1979 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 3 1 and accepted in all keys, textbooks and monographs: the generic name Bucephalus and the specific name B. polymorphus for the species known under this name; the other species, which belongs to the genus Rhipidocotyle Diesing, 1858, should under the Law of Priority be known as R. campanula (Dujardin, 1845). The history of the case is as follows. 4. Baer (1827:570—589) established the genus Bucephalus for the new species B. polymorphus (the type species by monotypy). He based the description on sporocysts and cercariae from the bivalves Anodonta mutabilis Clessin and Unio pictorum Linnaeus. 5. In 1845 Felix Dujardin described from the intestine of Esox lucius Linnaeus small adult trematodes which, according to the author, represent the same species as metacercariae that he had formerly found on the branchia of Cyprinus idus Linnaeus. He classified them in the genus Distoma and gave the new name campanula. The description of the anterior organ given by Dujardin suggests that he was deal
{"title":"BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE","authors":"Proposeduseofthe","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a001","url":null,"abstract":"Recent work on trematode parasites of freshwater fishes has shown that, if the Law of Priority is strictly applied, the species commonly known as Rhipidocotyle illensis (Ziegler, 1883) Vejnar, 1956, must be known as R. polymorphus (Baer, 1827) and the forgotten name Gasterostomum fimbriatum Siebold, 1848 must be applied to the species widely known as Bucephalus polymorphus Baer, 1827. At the same time, the well known generic name Rhipidocotyle Diesing, 1858 must fall as a synonym of Bucephalus Baer, 1827, and the forgotten name Gasterostomum Siebold, 1848 must be revived for the genus known at present as Bucephalus. The Commission is asked to take the necessary steps to prevent these changes being made. In European freshwater fishes there are two common species of trematodes of the family BUCEPHALIDAE, known as Bucephalus polymorphus, Baer, 1827 and Rhipidocotyle illensis (Ziegler, 1883) Vejnar, 1956. It has been SLSsnmtd iv2^. Bucephalus polymorphus develops from the cercaria described under this name by Baer in 1827, but the cercaria of the trematode now known by that name has not yet been described, although it was figured by Kinkelin(1968). 2. While studying the biology of these two species, both of which occur in Poland, I examined bivalves (the first intermediate host), cyprinid fishes (the second intermediate host) and predatory fishes (the definitive host); I found two different cercariae from which I experimentally obtained metacercariae of two species, but the metacercaria oi Rhipidocotyle illensis developed from cercariae identical with those described hy ^ditr diS Bucephalus polymorphus. Detailed data on the morphology of all developmental stages can be found in Baturo (1977). 3. As a result of this study it has become necessary to set in order the names of these two species of Trematoda. For stability of nomenclature it is necessary to maintain the names commonly used Bull. zool. Nomencl. vol. 36, part 1 , July 1979 Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 3 1 and accepted in all keys, textbooks and monographs: the generic name Bucephalus and the specific name B. polymorphus for the species known under this name; the other species, which belongs to the genus Rhipidocotyle Diesing, 1858, should under the Law of Priority be known as R. campanula (Dujardin, 1845). The history of the case is as follows. 4. Baer (1827:570—589) established the genus Bucephalus for the new species B. polymorphus (the type species by monotypy). He based the description on sporocysts and cercariae from the bivalves Anodonta mutabilis Clessin and Unio pictorum Linnaeus. 5. In 1845 Felix Dujardin described from the intestine of Esox lucius Linnaeus small adult trematodes which, according to the author, represent the same species as metacercariae that he had formerly found on the branchia of Cyprinus idus Linnaeus. He classified them in the genus Distoma and gave the new name campanula. The description of the anterior organ given by Dujardin suggests that he was deal","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89494373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment (Case 3847) – Opposition to the proposed conservation of Simopithecus oswaldi Andrews, 1916 (currently Theropithecus oswaldi; Mammalia, Primates, Cercopithecidae), by reversal of precedence with Cynocephalus atlanticus Thomas, 1884(see BZN 78: 99–106 [Case])","authors":"D. Geraads, Z. Alemseged","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75604061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E. Delson, D. Alba, Stephen R. Frost, Dagmawit Abebe Getahun, C. C. Gilbert
Delson et al. (2021) proposed to conserve Simopithecus oswaldi Andrews, 1916 (currently Theropithecus oswaldi) by reversal of precedence with Cynocephalus atlanticus Thomas, 1884 (currently Theropithecus atlanticus), on the basis that the latter name has been used only about 12 times since Alemseged & Geraads (1998) suggested that it be employed as a distinct species for North African fossils, while the former name is in widespread usage. Theropithecus oswaldi has been discussed in over 75 publications since 1998 and is the name assigned to most Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil samples, often with subdivision into chrono-geographic subspecies across Africa and into Eurasia. If these two species were considered synonymous, leading to Theropithecus atlanticus becoming the senior synonym for these many fossil samples and subspecies, prevailing usage would be upset. Moreover, there is no consensus about this synonymy, so that authors might Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 79 (15 October 2022) ISSN 2057-0570 (online)
Delson等人(2021)提出，1916年的Simopithecus oswaldi Andrews(现在的Theropithecus oswaldi)与1884年的Cynocephalus atlanticus Thomas(现在的Theropithecus atlanticus)的优先顺序相反，以保存后者的名称，因为自Alemseged和Geraads(1998)建议将其作为北非化石的一个独特物种使用以来，后者的名称仅被使用了大约12次，而前者的名称则被广泛使用。自1998年以来，在超过75份出版物中讨论了奥斯瓦尔迪蜥古猿，它是大多数上新世和更新世化石样本的名称，通常在非洲和欧亚大陆细分为时间地理亚种。如果这两个物种被认为是同义词，导致大西洋蜥古猿成为这些化石样本和亚种的高级同义词，那么普遍的用法将会被打乱。此外，关于这个同义词还没有达成共识，因此作者可以参考Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 79 (15 October 2022) ISSN 2057-0570 (online)。
{"title":"Comment (Case 3847) – Authors' reply to opposition to proposed conservation of Simopithecus oswaldi Andrews, 1916 by reversal of precedence with Cynocephalus atlanticus Thomas, 1884.(see BZN 78: 99–106 [Case]; BZN 79: 53–54 [Comment])","authors":"E. Delson, D. Alba, Stephen R. Frost, Dagmawit Abebe Getahun, C. C. Gilbert","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a011","url":null,"abstract":"Delson et al. (2021) proposed to conserve Simopithecus oswaldi Andrews, 1916 (currently Theropithecus oswaldi) by reversal of precedence with Cynocephalus atlanticus Thomas, 1884 (currently Theropithecus atlanticus), on the basis that the latter name has been used only about 12 times since Alemseged & Geraads (1998) suggested that it be employed as a distinct species for North African fossils, while the former name is in widespread usage. Theropithecus oswaldi has been discussed in over 75 publications since 1998 and is the name assigned to most Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil samples, often with subdivision into chrono-geographic subspecies across Africa and into Eurasia. If these two species were considered synonymous, leading to Theropithecus atlanticus becoming the senior synonym for these many fossil samples and subspecies, prevailing usage would be upset. Moreover, there is no consensus about this synonymy, so that authors might Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 79 (15 October 2022) ISSN 2057-0570 (online)","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84177176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Closure of Cases (3845, 3855)","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89268726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has re-established the precedence of Megaperidae Manter, 1934 over Apocreadiinae Skrjabin, 1942 for certain digenean trematodes of fish by suspending the application of Article 35.5 of the Code.
{"title":"Opinion 2483 (Case 3775) – Megaperidae Manter, 1934 (Platyhelminthes, Digenea): precedence re-established over Apocreadiinae Skrjabin, 1942","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has re-established the precedence of Megaperidae Manter, 1934 over Apocreadiinae Skrjabin, 1942 for certain digenean trematodes of fish by suspending the application of Article 35.5 of the Code.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89985476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy of Margaritidae Blainville, 1824 (type genus Margarita Leach, 1814) (Mollusca: Bivalvia) with Margaritidae Thiele, 1924 (type genus Margarites Gray, 1847) (Mollusca: Gastropoda) by emending the latter to Margaritesidae. These two homonymous family-group names are based on similar but not identical type-genus names and both are in current use.
{"title":"Case 3828 – The Family Name of the Pearl Oysters: Proposal to Remove the Homonymy of Margaritidae Blainville, 1824 (Mollusca: Bivalvia) with Margaritidae Thiele, 1924 (Mollusca: Gastropoda) by Emending the Latter to Margaritesidae","authors":"R. Bieler, P. Bouchet","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy of Margaritidae Blainville, 1824 (type genus Margarita Leach, 1814) (Mollusca: Bivalvia) with Margaritidae Thiele, 1924 (type genus Margarites Gray, 1847) (Mollusca: Gastropoda) by emending the latter to Margaritesidae. These two homonymous family-group names are based on similar but not identical type-genus names and both are in current use.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90842456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has conserved current usage of the specific name of Clausilia quadriplicata Schmidt, 1868 (currently Quadriplicata quadriplicata) by suppressing its senior homonym Clausilia ventricosa var. quadriplicata Fitzinger, 1833.
摘要。国际动物命名委员会通过抑制其高级同音词Clausilia var. quadriplicata Fitzinger, 1833，保留了Clausilia quadriplicata Schmidt, 1868(目前为quadriplicata)的特定名称的当前用法。
{"title":"Opinion 2484 (Case 3778) – Clausilia quadriplicata Schmidt, 1868 (currently Quadriplicata quadriplicata; Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Clausiliidae): conserved by suppression of the senior homonym Clausilia ventricosa var. quadriplicata Fitzinger, 1833","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v79.a014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v79.a014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has conserved current usage of the specific name of Clausilia quadriplicata Schmidt, 1868 (currently Quadriplicata quadriplicata) by suppressing its senior homonym Clausilia ventricosa var. quadriplicata Fitzinger, 1833.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89941110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：