Pub Date : 2002-03-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200203000-00008
M. Posner, J. Alverdy
Minimally invasive surgical approaches were designed to enhance quality of care and improve patient outcome by minimizing postoperative pain, shortening hospital stay, reducing costs, and facilitating early return to work and presurgical lifestyle. The hand-assisted laparoscopic approach for resection of cancer is still in its formative stage, and this review places it in proper perspective within the context of minimally invasive surgery currently being performed for both benign and malignant disease. The review also outlines the potential advantages and disadvantages, techniques, and site-specific procedures of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for cancer.
{"title":"Hand‐Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Cancer","authors":"M. Posner, J. Alverdy","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200203000-00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200203000-00008","url":null,"abstract":"Minimally invasive surgical approaches were designed to enhance quality of care and improve patient outcome by minimizing postoperative pain, shortening hospital stay, reducing costs, and facilitating early return to work and presurgical lifestyle. The hand-assisted laparoscopic approach for resection of cancer is still in its formative stage, and this review places it in proper perspective within the context of minimally invasive surgery currently being performed for both benign and malignant disease. The review also outlines the potential advantages and disadvantages, techniques, and site-specific procedures of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for cancer.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"374 1","pages":"144–153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80541450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-03-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200203000-00007
E. Davis, C. Chao, K. McMasters
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular biology technique that holds great promise as a way to perform molecular staging of cancer by detecting very early metastatic disease. Significant data suggest that PCR analysis may play an important role in the management of colorectal cancer in the future. However, for PCR staging of breast cancer, progress awaits identification of gene markers that have sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Within the next few years, the results of the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial and other ongoing studies will determine whether PCR evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes and peripheral blood cells has prognostic relevance in melanoma. The future of cancer management will likely revolve around the molecular staging of tumors, and PCR is but one method that may better define subgroups of patients that are appropriate candidates for various anticancer therapies.
{"title":"Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Staging of Solid Tumors","authors":"E. Davis, C. Chao, K. McMasters","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200203000-00007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200203000-00007","url":null,"abstract":"Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a molecular biology technique that holds great promise as a way to perform molecular staging of cancer by detecting very early metastatic disease. Significant data suggest that PCR analysis may play an important role in the management of colorectal cancer in the future. However, for PCR staging of breast cancer, progress awaits identification of gene markers that have sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Within the next few years, the results of the Sunbelt Melanoma Trial and other ongoing studies will determine whether PCR evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes and peripheral blood cells has prognostic relevance in melanoma. The future of cancer management will likely revolve around the molecular staging of tumors, and PCR is but one method that may better define subgroups of patients that are appropriate candidates for various anticancer therapies.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"135–143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81059580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00002
R. Childs, R. Srinivasan
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was originally developed as a method to rescue hematopoietic function following high dose “myeloablative” therapy in the treatment of hematological malignancies. In the first two decades of its use, dose-intensive chemotherapy alone was credited with curing those patients who achieved sustained remission following this procedure. However, more recently investigators have come to recognize that antineoplastic effects mediated by immunocompetent donor T-cells transplanted with the stem cell allograft can be induced against hematological malignancies. Indeed, this graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) or graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect is now felt to represent the principal modality required to sustain durable remissions of hematological malignancies following this approach. The powerful and potentially curative nature of the GVT effect in hematological cancers has recently lured oncologists into exploring the therapeutic potential of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as an investigational approach for treatment-refractory solid tumors. We review here the development and early clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as potential immunotherapy for solid tumors.
{"title":"Advances in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Directing Graft‐Versus‐Leukemia at Solid Tumors","authors":"R. Childs, R. Srinivasan","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00002","url":null,"abstract":"Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was originally developed as a method to rescue hematopoietic function following high dose “myeloablative” therapy in the treatment of hematological malignancies. In the first two decades of its use, dose-intensive chemotherapy alone was credited with curing those patients who achieved sustained remission following this procedure. However, more recently investigators have come to recognize that antineoplastic effects mediated by immunocompetent donor T-cells transplanted with the stem cell allograft can be induced against hematological malignancies. Indeed, this graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) or graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect is now felt to represent the principal modality required to sustain durable remissions of hematological malignancies following this approach. The powerful and potentially curative nature of the GVT effect in hematological cancers has recently lured oncologists into exploring the therapeutic potential of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as an investigational approach for treatment-refractory solid tumors. We review here the development and early clinical results of allogeneic stem cell transplantation as potential immunotherapy for solid tumors.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"196 1","pages":"2–11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77513437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00003
K. Anderson, L. Boise, R. Louie, S. Waxman
Multiple myeloma remains an incurable malignancy with a median survival that does not exceed 3 years. At least one third of patients with multiple myeloma fail to respond to induction chemotherapy, and those who initially achieve remission eventually relapse and require additional therapy. Recent reports demonstrating the efficacy of arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia have prompted a revival in the clinical use of this compound. The achievement of clinical responses marked by molecular conversion of the malignant phenotype and remissions in patients who had failed to respond to multiple courses of conventional chemotherapy provided the impetus to explore its use in multiple myeloma. Properties that favor the use of arsenic trioxide are its ability to target selectively malignant cells for apoptosis through enhancement of reactive oxygen species, to induce differentiation, and to inhibit angiogenesis. Multiple events involved in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma coincide with pathways targeted by arsenic trioxide, and early results have suggested that clinical responses and safety in patients are promising with advanced disease.
{"title":"Arsenic Trioxide in Multiple Myeloma: Rationale and Future Directions","authors":"K. Anderson, L. Boise, R. Louie, S. Waxman","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00003","url":null,"abstract":"Multiple myeloma remains an incurable malignancy with a median survival that does not exceed 3 years. At least one third of patients with multiple myeloma fail to respond to induction chemotherapy, and those who initially achieve remission eventually relapse and require additional therapy. Recent reports demonstrating the efficacy of arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukemia have prompted a revival in the clinical use of this compound. The achievement of clinical responses marked by molecular conversion of the malignant phenotype and remissions in patients who had failed to respond to multiple courses of conventional chemotherapy provided the impetus to explore its use in multiple myeloma. Properties that favor the use of arsenic trioxide are its ability to target selectively malignant cells for apoptosis through enhancement of reactive oxygen species, to induce differentiation, and to inhibit angiogenesis. Multiple events involved in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma coincide with pathways targeted by arsenic trioxide, and early results have suggested that clinical responses and safety in patients are promising with advanced disease.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"12–25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79879381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00012
K. Wallner, G. Merrick, L. True, W. Cavanagh, C. Simpson, W. Butler
PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the shorter half-life of Pd-103 versus 1–125 results in a shorter duration of radiation-related symptoms after prostate brachytherapy. METHODSAs of February 2000, 110 of a planned total of 380 patients with 1997 American Joint Commission clinical stage T1c-T2a prostatic carcinoma (Gleason grade 2–6, prostate-specific antigen, 4–10 ng/mL) had been randomly assigned to implantation with 1–125 (144 Gy, TG-43) or Pd-103 (125 Gy, NIST-99).Isotope implantation was performed by standard techniques, using a modified peripheral loading pattern. Treatment-related morbidity was monitored by mailed questionnaires, using standard American Urologic Association (AUA) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Use of a-blockers to relieve obstructive symptoms was not controlled for but was noted at each follow-up point. All patients reported here have a minimum 1-year follow-up. Randomization was carried out at a central enrollment office where eligibility criteria were confirmed and the patient assigned by computerized random number generator to one of the two treatment arms. Patients were assigned to 95 blocks of four. Most statistical comparisons shown here are by Student's unpaired t-test at specific follow-up times, as indicated in the figure legends. Additionally, considering the patients' scores change overtime, repeated measures were incorporated in a mixed model assuming an unstructured covariance matrix. RESULTSPatients in each arm were well matched by preimplant prostate volume, AUA score, and age. The AUA scores peaked at the 1-month point for both isotopes and then gradually declined. The difference was greatest at 6 months, when 1–125 patients had a mean AUA score of 16 (± 8), compared with 11 (± 10) for the Pd-103 patients. By 12 months, mean AUA scores for the Pd-103 patients had decreased to 12 (± 9), compared with 13 (± 8) for the 1–125 patients. At 6 months after implantation, 41% of Pd-103 patients were still taking α-blockers, versus 44% of 1–125 patients. The differences between isotopes were more marked in patients with a low pretreatment AUA score or smaller preimplant transrectal ultrasonography volume. Results of the mixed model, incorporating repeated measures for each patient, showed that the effect of isotope choice on AUA score depended on time. This effect was further dependent on baseline AUA score, but not on transrectal ultrasonography volume or on age. Urinary and rectal morbidity was generally low, typically grade 1 or 2. There was a trend to greater morbidity with 1–125 than with Pd-103, most markedly at the 6-month time point. DISCUSSIONPatients treated with Pd-103 recovered from their radiation-induced prostatitis sooner than 1–125 patients. It appears that patients with minimal pretreatment urinary obstructive symptoms are the most likely to experience implant-related exacerbations of their symptoms and are the most likely to
{"title":"1–125 Versus Pd‐103 for Low‐Risk Prostate Cancer: Morbidity Outcomes from a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial","authors":"K. Wallner, G. Merrick, L. True, W. Cavanagh, C. Simpson, W. Butler","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00012","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the shorter half-life of Pd-103 versus 1–125 results in a shorter duration of radiation-related symptoms after prostate brachytherapy. METHODSAs of February 2000, 110 of a planned total of 380 patients with 1997 American Joint Commission clinical stage T1c-T2a prostatic carcinoma (Gleason grade 2–6, prostate-specific antigen, 4–10 ng/mL) had been randomly assigned to implantation with 1–125 (144 Gy, TG-43) or Pd-103 (125 Gy, NIST-99).Isotope implantation was performed by standard techniques, using a modified peripheral loading pattern. Treatment-related morbidity was monitored by mailed questionnaires, using standard American Urologic Association (AUA) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Use of a-blockers to relieve obstructive symptoms was not controlled for but was noted at each follow-up point. All patients reported here have a minimum 1-year follow-up. Randomization was carried out at a central enrollment office where eligibility criteria were confirmed and the patient assigned by computerized random number generator to one of the two treatment arms. Patients were assigned to 95 blocks of four. Most statistical comparisons shown here are by Student's unpaired t-test at specific follow-up times, as indicated in the figure legends. Additionally, considering the patients' scores change overtime, repeated measures were incorporated in a mixed model assuming an unstructured covariance matrix. RESULTSPatients in each arm were well matched by preimplant prostate volume, AUA score, and age. The AUA scores peaked at the 1-month point for both isotopes and then gradually declined. The difference was greatest at 6 months, when 1–125 patients had a mean AUA score of 16 (± 8), compared with 11 (± 10) for the Pd-103 patients. By 12 months, mean AUA scores for the Pd-103 patients had decreased to 12 (± 9), compared with 13 (± 8) for the 1–125 patients. At 6 months after implantation, 41% of Pd-103 patients were still taking α-blockers, versus 44% of 1–125 patients. The differences between isotopes were more marked in patients with a low pretreatment AUA score or smaller preimplant transrectal ultrasonography volume. Results of the mixed model, incorporating repeated measures for each patient, showed that the effect of isotope choice on AUA score depended on time. This effect was further dependent on baseline AUA score, but not on transrectal ultrasonography volume or on age. Urinary and rectal morbidity was generally low, typically grade 1 or 2. There was a trend to greater morbidity with 1–125 than with Pd-103, most markedly at the 6-month time point. DISCUSSIONPatients treated with Pd-103 recovered from their radiation-induced prostatitis sooner than 1–125 patients. It appears that patients with minimal pretreatment urinary obstructive symptoms are the most likely to experience implant-related exacerbations of their symptoms and are the most likely to","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"55 1","pages":"69–73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89185476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00007
D. Grönemeyer, S. Schirp, A. Gevargez
PURPOSEMetastases to the spine are a challenging problem. Percutaneous, image-guided tumor ablation with a thermal energy source, such as radiofrequency, has received increasing attention as a promising technique for the treatment of focal malignant disease.We used radiofrequency ablation for patients with unresectable, osteolytic spine metastases under computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of radiofrequency ablation as a palliative procedure to reduce pain and back pain-related disability in patients with vertebral and paravertebral spine tumors who were not able to benefit from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODSBetween November 1999 and January 2001, 10 patients with unresectable spine metastases were treated with radiofrequency ablation. For the ablation we used a 50-W radiofrequency generator that is connected to an expandable electrode catheter (RITA Medical System Inc., Mountain View, CA). The mean patient age was 64.4 years. Metastases were ablated in the thoracic spine, the lumbar spine, and/or the sacral bone. Tumordiameter ranged from 1.5 to 9 cm. Combined computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance was used to guide the procedure.Operations were carried out without heavy sedation with the patient under local anesthesia only. The thermal lesion was produced by applying temperatures of 50° to 120°C for 8–12 minutes. Vertebroplasty was performed in four patients by use of 3 to 5.5 mL of polymethyl methacrylate. Therapy outcome was documented by magnet resonance imaging. Before the therapy and on follow-up of an average of 5.8 months, pain was assessed with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale. Back pain-related disability was measured with the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Neurologic and health status were documented on the Frankel score and the Karnofsky index. RESULTSAt follow-up, 9 of 10 patients reported reduced pain (Visual Analogue Scale). In patients who experienced pain relief, there was an average relative pain reduction of 74.4%. Back pain-related disability was reduced by an average of 27%. Neurologic function was preserved in nine patients and improved in one. General health was stabilized in six patients, slightly increased (by 10%-20%) in two patients, significantly enhanced (by 50%) in one patient, and slightly reduced in one patient. No complications were reported. In the treated region, magnetic resonance imaging showed no further tumor growth after the therapy. DISCUSSIONRadiofrequency ablation was successfully performed in all 10 patients. Needles were placed accurately under image guidance, and a controlled lesion was created. Pain- and back pain-related disability was clearly reduced, and neurologic function was preserved or stabilized. When confirmed by further investigation, this therapy may be a new option for patients with unresectable spine tumors that do not respond to radiot
目的脊柱转移是一个具有挑战性的问题。热能量源(如射频)经皮图像引导肿瘤消融作为一种治疗局灶性恶性疾病的有前途的技术,已受到越来越多的关注。我们在计算机断层扫描和透视引导下,对无法切除的脊柱溶骨性转移瘤患者进行射频消融治疗。本研究的目的是确定射频消融作为一种姑息性治疗方法的可行性、有效性和安全性,以减轻不能从放疗、化疗或手术中获益的椎体和椎旁脊柱肿瘤患者的疼痛和背痛相关残疾。患者与方法1999年11月至2001年1月间,对10例不可切除的脊柱转移瘤进行射频消融治疗。对于消融,我们使用了一个50瓦的射频发生器,连接到一个可扩展的电极导管(RITA Medical System Inc., Mountain View, CA)。患者平均年龄64.4岁。在胸椎、腰椎和/或骶骨中切除转移灶。肿瘤直径1.5 ~ 9cm。采用计算机断层扫描和透视联合引导。手术在局部麻醉下进行,没有大量镇静。热损伤是通过施加50°至120°C的温度8-12分钟产生的。4例患者采用3 ~ 5.5 mL聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯进行椎体成形术。通过磁共振成像记录治疗结果。在治疗前和平均5.8个月的随访中,用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛。用汉诺威功能能力问卷测量背痛相关残疾。用Frankel评分和Karnofsky指数记录神经系统和健康状况。结果随访中,10例患者中有9例疼痛减轻(视觉模拟评分)。在经历疼痛缓解的患者中,平均相对疼痛减轻了74.4%。与背痛相关的残疾平均减少了27%。9例患者神经功能保留,1例患者神经功能改善。6名患者的总体健康状况稳定,2名患者的健康状况略有改善(10%-20%),1名患者的健康状况显著改善(50%),1名患者的健康状况略有下降。无并发症报道。在治疗区域,磁共振成像显示治疗后肿瘤没有进一步生长。10例患者均成功行射频消融术。针在图像引导下精确放置,形成可控病变。疼痛和背痛相关的残疾明显减少,神经功能得以保留或稳定。如果得到进一步的研究证实,这种疗法可能是放疗和化疗无效的不可切除脊柱肿瘤患者的一种新选择。
{"title":"Image‐Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Spinal Tumors: Preliminary Experience with an Expandable Array Electrode","authors":"D. Grönemeyer, S. Schirp, A. Gevargez","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00007","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEMetastases to the spine are a challenging problem. Percutaneous, image-guided tumor ablation with a thermal energy source, such as radiofrequency, has received increasing attention as a promising technique for the treatment of focal malignant disease.We used radiofrequency ablation for patients with unresectable, osteolytic spine metastases under computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of radiofrequency ablation as a palliative procedure to reduce pain and back pain-related disability in patients with vertebral and paravertebral spine tumors who were not able to benefit from radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODSBetween November 1999 and January 2001, 10 patients with unresectable spine metastases were treated with radiofrequency ablation. For the ablation we used a 50-W radiofrequency generator that is connected to an expandable electrode catheter (RITA Medical System Inc., Mountain View, CA). The mean patient age was 64.4 years. Metastases were ablated in the thoracic spine, the lumbar spine, and/or the sacral bone. Tumordiameter ranged from 1.5 to 9 cm. Combined computed tomographic and fluoroscopic guidance was used to guide the procedure.Operations were carried out without heavy sedation with the patient under local anesthesia only. The thermal lesion was produced by applying temperatures of 50° to 120°C for 8–12 minutes. Vertebroplasty was performed in four patients by use of 3 to 5.5 mL of polymethyl methacrylate. Therapy outcome was documented by magnet resonance imaging. Before the therapy and on follow-up of an average of 5.8 months, pain was assessed with the help of the Visual Analogue Scale. Back pain-related disability was measured with the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Neurologic and health status were documented on the Frankel score and the Karnofsky index. RESULTSAt follow-up, 9 of 10 patients reported reduced pain (Visual Analogue Scale). In patients who experienced pain relief, there was an average relative pain reduction of 74.4%. Back pain-related disability was reduced by an average of 27%. Neurologic function was preserved in nine patients and improved in one. General health was stabilized in six patients, slightly increased (by 10%-20%) in two patients, significantly enhanced (by 50%) in one patient, and slightly reduced in one patient. No complications were reported. In the treated region, magnetic resonance imaging showed no further tumor growth after the therapy. DISCUSSIONRadiofrequency ablation was successfully performed in all 10 patients. Needles were placed accurately under image guidance, and a controlled lesion was created. Pain- and back pain-related disability was clearly reduced, and neurologic function was preserved or stabilized. When confirmed by further investigation, this therapy may be a new option for patients with unresectable spine tumors that do not respond to radiot","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"33–39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90538697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00009
V. Gupta, N. Jaskowiak, M. Beckett, H. Mauceri, Jeremy Grunstein, R. Johnson, D. Calvin, E. Nodzenski, M. Pejovic, D. Kufe, M. Posner, R. Weichselbaum
PURPOSEVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important mediator of endothelial cell proliferation and survival. The purpose of the present studies was to investigate the role of VEGF in the tumor response to ionizing radiation. METHODSTwo ras-transformed murinefibrosarcoma cell lines, VEGF+/+ and VEGF−/− were exposed to ionizing radiation (0, 1, 3, 5, 7 or 9 Gy) in vitro, and clonogenic survival was determined. VEGF+/+ and VEGF-- xenografts were generated in athymic nude mice and then treated with ionizing radiation (ten 5-Gy fractions = 50 Gy). Mean fractional tumor volume was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. To determine whether VEGF enhances tumor radioresistance by targeting endothelial cells, we performed clonogenic survival assays with human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Surviving fractions were calculated after treatment with ionizing radiation (5 Gy) and recombinant hVEGF165 (0, 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL). To determine whether VEGF neutralization enhances tumor radio-sensitivity, we employed anti-VEGF165 monoclonal antibody to treat human tumor xenografts. Tumors were exposed to ionizing radiation (four 5-Gy fractions = 20 Gy) and treated with anti-VEGF antibody (0, 5, and 25 μg/kg in four intraperitoneal doses). Mean fractional tumor volume was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. To elucidate the molecular mechanism contributing to the observed anti-VEGF/ionizing radiation interaction, we exposed human umbilical vein endothelial cells to ionizing radiation (5 Gy) in the presence of anti-VEGF antibody (1 μg/mL). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cell lysates was probed for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and MAPK kinase (MEK1/MEK2). RESULTSThe in vitro radiosensitivities of the VEGF+/+ and VEGF−/− clones were equivalent (Do = 146 vs 149). However, the VEGF+/+ xenografts were more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of ionizing radiation than the VEGF−/− xenografts. VEGF+/+ xenografts demonstrated a faster doubling time (4.5 vs 6.0 days) and a shorter growth delay (15 vs 23 days) than VEGF−/− xenografts. The surviving fraction of human umbilical vein endothelial cells after exposure to ionizing radiation was significantly enhanced in the presence of VEGF (6.4% vs 12.5%). Western blot analysis demonstrated that stimulation of MAPK and MEK1/MEK2 was abrogated after exposure to anti-VEGF antibody. DISCUSSIONThese findings represent the first genetic evidence that factors other than inherent tumor cell radiosensitivity are important determinants of radiocurability. Antitumor strategies targeting VEGF and other endothelial cell survival mechanisms may be used to enhance the cytotoxic effects of radiotherapy.
目的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)是内皮细胞增殖和存活的重要调节因子。本研究的目的是探讨VEGF在肿瘤对电离辐射的反应中的作用。方法将两种ras转化的小鼠纤维肉瘤细胞系VEGF+/+和VEGF - / -分别暴露于电离辐射(0、1、3、5、7和9 Gy)下,观察其克隆存活率。在胸腺裸小鼠中生成VEGF+/+和VEGF--异种移植物,然后用电离辐射(10个5-Gy分量= 50 Gy)处理。采用平均肿瘤体积分数评价治疗效果。为了确定VEGF是否通过靶向内皮细胞增强肿瘤的放射耐药,我们用人脐静脉内皮细胞进行了克隆生存试验。在电离辐射(5 Gy)和重组hVEGF165(0、1、10和100 ng/mL)处理后计算存活分数。为了确定VEGF中和是否增强肿瘤的放射敏感性,我们采用抗vegf165单克隆抗体治疗人肿瘤异种移植物。肿瘤暴露于电离辐射(4个5-Gy分量= 20 Gy),并以抗vegf抗体(0、5和25 μg/kg, 4次腹腔剂量)治疗。采用平均肿瘤体积分数评价治疗效果。为了阐明抗vegf /电离辐射相互作用的分子机制,我们将人脐静脉内皮细胞暴露在电离辐射(5 Gy)中,同时存在抗vegf抗体(1 μg/mL)。用十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳检测细胞裂解物的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)和MAPK激酶(MEK1/MEK2)。结果VEGF+/+和VEGF - / -克隆的体外放射敏感性相当(Do = 146 vs 149)。然而,VEGF+/+异种移植物比VEGF - / -异种移植物更能抵抗电离辐射的细胞毒性作用。与VEGF - / -异种移植物相比,VEGF+/+异种移植物表现出更快的倍增时间(4.5 vs 6.0天)和更短的生长延迟(15 vs 23天)。在VEGF存在的情况下,暴露于电离辐射后的人脐静脉内皮细胞存活率显著提高(6.4% vs 12.5%)。Western blot分析表明,暴露于抗vegf抗体后,MAPK和MEK1/MEK2的刺激被消除。这些发现代表了除固有肿瘤细胞放射敏感性之外的其他因素是放射可治性的重要决定因素的第一个遗传学证据。针对VEGF和其他内皮细胞存活机制的抗肿瘤策略可用于增强放疗的细胞毒性作用。
{"title":"Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Enhances Endothelial Cell Survival and Tumor Radioresistance","authors":"V. Gupta, N. Jaskowiak, M. Beckett, H. Mauceri, Jeremy Grunstein, R. Johnson, D. Calvin, E. Nodzenski, M. Pejovic, D. Kufe, M. Posner, R. Weichselbaum","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00009","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important mediator of endothelial cell proliferation and survival. The purpose of the present studies was to investigate the role of VEGF in the tumor response to ionizing radiation. METHODSTwo ras-transformed murinefibrosarcoma cell lines, VEGF+/+ and VEGF−/− were exposed to ionizing radiation (0, 1, 3, 5, 7 or 9 Gy) in vitro, and clonogenic survival was determined. VEGF+/+ and VEGF-- xenografts were generated in athymic nude mice and then treated with ionizing radiation (ten 5-Gy fractions = 50 Gy). Mean fractional tumor volume was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. To determine whether VEGF enhances tumor radioresistance by targeting endothelial cells, we performed clonogenic survival assays with human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Surviving fractions were calculated after treatment with ionizing radiation (5 Gy) and recombinant hVEGF165 (0, 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL). To determine whether VEGF neutralization enhances tumor radio-sensitivity, we employed anti-VEGF165 monoclonal antibody to treat human tumor xenografts. Tumors were exposed to ionizing radiation (four 5-Gy fractions = 20 Gy) and treated with anti-VEGF antibody (0, 5, and 25 μg/kg in four intraperitoneal doses). Mean fractional tumor volume was used to evaluate treatment efficacy. To elucidate the molecular mechanism contributing to the observed anti-VEGF/ionizing radiation interaction, we exposed human umbilical vein endothelial cells to ionizing radiation (5 Gy) in the presence of anti-VEGF antibody (1 μg/mL). Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of cell lysates was probed for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and MAPK kinase (MEK1/MEK2). RESULTSThe in vitro radiosensitivities of the VEGF+/+ and VEGF−/− clones were equivalent (Do = 146 vs 149). However, the VEGF+/+ xenografts were more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of ionizing radiation than the VEGF−/− xenografts. VEGF+/+ xenografts demonstrated a faster doubling time (4.5 vs 6.0 days) and a shorter growth delay (15 vs 23 days) than VEGF−/− xenografts. The surviving fraction of human umbilical vein endothelial cells after exposure to ionizing radiation was significantly enhanced in the presence of VEGF (6.4% vs 12.5%). Western blot analysis demonstrated that stimulation of MAPK and MEK1/MEK2 was abrogated after exposure to anti-VEGF antibody. DISCUSSIONThese findings represent the first genetic evidence that factors other than inherent tumor cell radiosensitivity are important determinants of radiocurability. Antitumor strategies targeting VEGF and other endothelial cell survival mechanisms may be used to enhance the cytotoxic effects of radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":"47–54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79221898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00013
Jiade J. Lu, Y. Bains, M. Abdel-Wahab, A. H. Brandon, A. Wolfson, W. Raub, C. M. Wilkinson, A. Markoe
PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine whether a dose response exists for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBDC) when treated with increasingly higher radiation doses delivered via a combination of external beam radiation (EBRT) and high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRIB). To establish the best tolerated dose of HDRIB. METHODS AND MATERIALSEighteen patients with pathologically proven, locoregional but unresectable or incompletely resected EBDC were studied from 1991–1998 in this phase I/II trial. All patients received EBRT, delivered via megavoltage photons at standard fractionation schedules, for a total dose of 45 Gy. The HDRIB was delivered using the nucleotron HDR remote afterloading unit with a 10 Ci Ir192 source. Each treatment of HDRIB delivered 7 Gy at 1 cm depth. The first group of eight patients received one treatment of HDRIB (Group 1, total dose = 52 Gy). The second group of six patients received two weekly treatments (Group 2, total dose = 59 Gy). The last group of four patients received three weekly treatments of HDRIB (Group 3, total dose = 66 Gy). HDRIB was delivered once weekly concomitant with the EBRT. Acute adverse reactions were evaluated after for each group of patients before escalating to the next higher dose level of HDRIB. RESULTSThe median follow up time for all 18 patients was 15 months. The median survival for all 18 patients was 12.2 months (range 2 to 79.6 months). Overall two-year survival was 27.8%. Three patients (16.7%) had survival of more than 5 years. Dose response is suggested by the median survival of the three groups (9, 12.2, and 20.3 months for Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively), although this did not reach statistical significance. Complete or partial response (>50% reduction in tumor size) was seen in 25% of patients receiving total of 52 Gy compared to 80% of patients (5 patients in Group 2 and 3 patients in Group 3) receiving greater than 59 Gy (P = 0.05). No patients developed Grade 4 complications. One patient in Group 2 developed Grade 3 toxicity after second treatment of HDRIB. CONCLUSIONHigh dose rate brachytherapy of 21 Gy in three divided weekly treatments, plus 45 Gy of external beam radiation is well tolerated. A dose response is shown with significant increase of PR and CR rate for dose >59 Gy. This modality of treatment appears to be safe and effective for inoperable extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma.
{"title":"High‐Dose‐Rate Remote Afterloading Intracavitary Br achy therapy for the Treatment of Extrahepatic Biliary Duct Carcinoma","authors":"Jiade J. Lu, Y. Bains, M. Abdel-Wahab, A. H. Brandon, A. Wolfson, W. Raub, C. M. Wilkinson, A. Markoe","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00013","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine whether a dose response exists for extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBDC) when treated with increasingly higher radiation doses delivered via a combination of external beam radiation (EBRT) and high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRIB). To establish the best tolerated dose of HDRIB. METHODS AND MATERIALSEighteen patients with pathologically proven, locoregional but unresectable or incompletely resected EBDC were studied from 1991–1998 in this phase I/II trial. All patients received EBRT, delivered via megavoltage photons at standard fractionation schedules, for a total dose of 45 Gy. The HDRIB was delivered using the nucleotron HDR remote afterloading unit with a 10 Ci Ir192 source. Each treatment of HDRIB delivered 7 Gy at 1 cm depth. The first group of eight patients received one treatment of HDRIB (Group 1, total dose = 52 Gy). The second group of six patients received two weekly treatments (Group 2, total dose = 59 Gy). The last group of four patients received three weekly treatments of HDRIB (Group 3, total dose = 66 Gy). HDRIB was delivered once weekly concomitant with the EBRT. Acute adverse reactions were evaluated after for each group of patients before escalating to the next higher dose level of HDRIB. RESULTSThe median follow up time for all 18 patients was 15 months. The median survival for all 18 patients was 12.2 months (range 2 to 79.6 months). Overall two-year survival was 27.8%. Three patients (16.7%) had survival of more than 5 years. Dose response is suggested by the median survival of the three groups (9, 12.2, and 20.3 months for Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively), although this did not reach statistical significance. Complete or partial response (>50% reduction in tumor size) was seen in 25% of patients receiving total of 52 Gy compared to 80% of patients (5 patients in Group 2 and 3 patients in Group 3) receiving greater than 59 Gy (P = 0.05). No patients developed Grade 4 complications. One patient in Group 2 developed Grade 3 toxicity after second treatment of HDRIB. CONCLUSIONHigh dose rate brachytherapy of 21 Gy in three divided weekly treatments, plus 45 Gy of external beam radiation is well tolerated. A dose response is shown with significant increase of PR and CR rate for dose >59 Gy. This modality of treatment appears to be safe and effective for inoperable extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"92 1","pages":"74–78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87497567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00008
I. Abdalla, A. Basu, S. Hellman
PURPOSEPatients with localized prostate cancer and their doctors face complex trade-offs when deciding on treatment. In this study, we modify the “number needed to treat” method to compare radical prostatectomy with radiotherapy. METHODSA MEDLINE search was performed to identify all studies of radical protatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Number needed to treat formulas were modified to account for not only survival but also for complications and their utilities. RESULTSThe unadjusted number needed to treat value for overall survival was 6 favoring prostatectomy (six patients have to undergo prostatectomy to have one more 10-year survivor than if they had undergone radiotherapy). Radiotherapy patients were 4 years older than prostatectomy patients. Because overall survival is strongly linked to patients' age and overall health, the numbers needed to treat for disease-specific and distant metastasis-free survival were analyzed to minimize patient selection bias. The unadjusted number needed to treat values for disease-specific and distant metastasis-free survival were 14 and 18, respectively. When number needed to treat is adjusted for complications and utilities, its value for overall survival is 14, disease-specific survival is -25, and distant metastasis free survival is -22, these last two favoring radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONSUtility-adjusted numbers needed to treat for prostatectomy and radiotherapy are greatly influenced by the likelihood of complications and the utility loss ascribed to them. When literature-reported values are used, radiotherapy is superior, but the differences in outcomes are small. With prostate-specific antigen screening and refined treatment methods, these values will change, and the modified number needed to treat can be used to evaluate, report and compare results. The consequences of treatment in terms of both survival and quality of life determine patient choice and physician recommendations.
{"title":"An Evidence‐Based Analysis of the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer","authors":"I. Abdalla, A. Basu, S. Hellman","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00008","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEPatients with localized prostate cancer and their doctors face complex trade-offs when deciding on treatment. In this study, we modify the “number needed to treat” method to compare radical prostatectomy with radiotherapy. METHODSA MEDLINE search was performed to identify all studies of radical protatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Number needed to treat formulas were modified to account for not only survival but also for complications and their utilities. RESULTSThe unadjusted number needed to treat value for overall survival was 6 favoring prostatectomy (six patients have to undergo prostatectomy to have one more 10-year survivor than if they had undergone radiotherapy). Radiotherapy patients were 4 years older than prostatectomy patients. Because overall survival is strongly linked to patients' age and overall health, the numbers needed to treat for disease-specific and distant metastasis-free survival were analyzed to minimize patient selection bias. The unadjusted number needed to treat values for disease-specific and distant metastasis-free survival were 14 and 18, respectively. When number needed to treat is adjusted for complications and utilities, its value for overall survival is 14, disease-specific survival is -25, and distant metastasis free survival is -22, these last two favoring radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONSUtility-adjusted numbers needed to treat for prostatectomy and radiotherapy are greatly influenced by the likelihood of complications and the utility loss ascribed to them. When literature-reported values are used, radiotherapy is superior, but the differences in outcomes are small. With prostate-specific antigen screening and refined treatment methods, these values will change, and the modified number needed to treat can be used to evaluate, report and compare results. The consequences of treatment in terms of both survival and quality of life determine patient choice and physician recommendations.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"88 1","pages":"40–46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88118743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2002-01-01DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200201000-00010
C. Perez, M. Ravindranath, Rishab K. Gupta, R. Tollenaar, C. J. van de Velde, T. Wood, D. Soh, D. Morton, A. Bilchik
BACKGROUNDBecause of the challenge in defining prognostic markers predictive of recurrence or progression, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) remains the most frequently used marker in colorectal cancer, despite its low sensitivity. We hypothesized that TA90-IC status and serum ganglioside levels might be useful markers and might be of prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. METHODSSerum samples from 68 patients undergoing surgical treatment for histologically proven colorectal cancer were analyzed for the presence of CEA, serum gangliosides, and TA90-IC. Forty-one patients had node-negative disease, whereas 27 patients had limited metastatic disease. The intent was curative resection, even for patients with metastatic disease. Cryopreserved serum specimens were analyzed in a blinded fashion for total serum ganglioside levels (by an assay that detects lipid-associated sialic acids), for CEA, and for TA90-IC (by a murine monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A positive value for TA90-IC levels was defined as an optical density (OD) of more than 0.410 at 405 nm. RESULTSSerum ganglioside levels were elevated more frequently than CEA concentrations (84% vs 44%). The combination of serum ganglioside and CEA values was more sensitive (88%) than CEA value alone (44%) in identifying patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. TA90-IC levels were elevated more frequently than CEA concentrations (56% vs 32%). The combination of TA90-IC and CEA values was more sensitive (72%) than CEA value alone (32%) in identifying patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. At an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cutoff level of 0.410, 15 (56%) patients had positive TA90-IC values. Fourteen patients alive with residual disease had a median OD TA90-IC level of 0.879, and only three patients had levels below the OD cutoff value of 0.410. Thirteen patients with no evidence of disease had a median level of 0.277, and only four patients had OD levels > 0.410. TA90-IC was significantly higher in the alive with residual disease patients than those rendered no evidence of disease (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONSWe speculate that a multiple-marker analysis that combines CEA values with serum ganglioside and TA90-IC values may be more sensitive than CEA value alone for detecting colorectal cancer. The potential prognostic significance of TA90-IC status in advanced disease warrants further investigation.
背景:由于在确定预测复发或进展的预后标志物方面存在挑战,尽管癌胚抗原(CEA)的敏感性较低,但它仍然是结直肠癌中最常用的标志物。我们假设TA90-IC状态和血清神经节苷脂水平可能是有用的标志物,可能对结直肠癌的预后有重要意义。方法对68例经组织学证实的结直肠癌手术患者的血清样本进行CEA、血清神经节苷脂和TA90-IC的分析。41例患者有淋巴结阴性疾病,而27例患者有有限的转移性疾病。目的是治疗性切除,即使是转移性疾病患者。冷冻保存的血清标本采用盲法分析血清神经节苷总水平(通过检测脂质相关唾液酸的测定)、CEA和TA90-IC(通过基于小鼠单克隆抗体的酶联免疫吸附测定)。TA90-IC水平的正值被定义为在405 nm处光密度(OD)大于0.410。结果血清神经节苷脂水平高于CEA浓度升高(84% vs 44%)。血清神经节苷脂与CEA联合检测早期结直肠癌患者的敏感性(88%)高于CEA单独检测(44%)。TA90-IC水平升高的频率高于CEA浓度(56% vs 32%)。TA90-IC和CEA联合诊断晚期结直肠癌患者的敏感性(72%)高于CEA单独诊断(32%)。在酶联免疫吸附试验的截止水平为0.410时,15例(56%)患者的TA90-IC值呈阳性。14例存活的残余疾病患者的中位OD TA90-IC水平为0.879,只有3例患者的水平低于OD临界值0.410。13例无疾病证据的患者的OD水平中位数为0.277,只有4例患者的OD水平> 0.410。TA90-IC在存在疾病的存活患者中显著高于无疾病的存活患者(P = 0.02)。结论CEA与血清神经节苷脂、TA90-IC等多指标联合检测结直肠癌可能比单独检测CEA更敏感。TA90-IC在晚期疾病中的潜在预后意义有待进一步研究。
{"title":"Serum Total Gangliosides and TA90‐IC Levels: Novel Immunologic Markers in Colorectal Cancer","authors":"C. Perez, M. Ravindranath, Rishab K. Gupta, R. Tollenaar, C. J. van de Velde, T. Wood, D. Soh, D. Morton, A. Bilchik","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200201000-00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200201000-00010","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDBecause of the challenge in defining prognostic markers predictive of recurrence or progression, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) remains the most frequently used marker in colorectal cancer, despite its low sensitivity. We hypothesized that TA90-IC status and serum ganglioside levels might be useful markers and might be of prognostic significance in colorectal cancer. METHODSSerum samples from 68 patients undergoing surgical treatment for histologically proven colorectal cancer were analyzed for the presence of CEA, serum gangliosides, and TA90-IC. Forty-one patients had node-negative disease, whereas 27 patients had limited metastatic disease. The intent was curative resection, even for patients with metastatic disease. Cryopreserved serum specimens were analyzed in a blinded fashion for total serum ganglioside levels (by an assay that detects lipid-associated sialic acids), for CEA, and for TA90-IC (by a murine monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A positive value for TA90-IC levels was defined as an optical density (OD) of more than 0.410 at 405 nm. RESULTSSerum ganglioside levels were elevated more frequently than CEA concentrations (84% vs 44%). The combination of serum ganglioside and CEA values was more sensitive (88%) than CEA value alone (44%) in identifying patients with early-stage colorectal cancer. TA90-IC levels were elevated more frequently than CEA concentrations (56% vs 32%). The combination of TA90-IC and CEA values was more sensitive (72%) than CEA value alone (32%) in identifying patients with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. At an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cutoff level of 0.410, 15 (56%) patients had positive TA90-IC values. Fourteen patients alive with residual disease had a median OD TA90-IC level of 0.879, and only three patients had levels below the OD cutoff value of 0.410. Thirteen patients with no evidence of disease had a median level of 0.277, and only four patients had OD levels > 0.410. TA90-IC was significantly higher in the alive with residual disease patients than those rendered no evidence of disease (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONSWe speculate that a multiple-marker analysis that combines CEA values with serum ganglioside and TA90-IC values may be more sensitive than CEA value alone for detecting colorectal cancer. The potential prognostic significance of TA90-IC status in advanced disease warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"55–61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76248418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}