Patients with psoriasis often take multiple medications due to comorbidities, raising concerns about drug–drug interactions (DDIs) during the development of new medicines. DDI risk assessments of a new small molecule showed risks of CYP3A4 autoinduction and being a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. We conducted a real-world evidence (RWE) claims analysis to assess the frequency of prescription claims for up to 12 months from the date of the initial psoriasis diagnosis for drugs that may interact with CYP3A4 substrates. We used 2013 to 2018 patient data from the US Merative MarketScan Research Database. Among patients diagnosed with psoriasis, less than 1% had a claim for a moderate/strong inducer, but up to 15% had a claim for moderate/strong inhibitor. Most prescriptions for CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers included antibiotics and anticonvulsants. While CYP3A4 inducers were rarely used, those treated received more than >90 days treatment. Then, these RWE data were used to inform the early translational medicine strategy for the new investigational drug by strategically integrating DDI evaluations into a first-in-human healthy volunteer trial prior to studies in patients with psoriasis. The resulting DDI substudy showed that the investigational small molecule did not induce midazolam clearance but was sensitive to CYP3A inhibition, leading to the decision to exclude concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors from clinical trials.
{"title":"Real-World Evidence Application in Translational Medicine: Making Use of Prescription Claims to Inform Drug–Drug Interactions of a New Psoriasis Treatment","authors":"Casey Kar-Chan Choong PhD, MS, MPH, Jessica Rehmel MS, Amita Datta-Mannan PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6118","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with psoriasis often take multiple medications due to comorbidities, raising concerns about drug–drug interactions (DDIs) during the development of new medicines. DDI risk assessments of a new small molecule showed risks of CYP3A4 autoinduction and being a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. We conducted a real-world evidence (RWE) claims analysis to assess the frequency of prescription claims for up to 12 months from the date of the initial psoriasis diagnosis for drugs that may interact with CYP3A4 substrates. We used 2013 to 2018 patient data from the US Merative MarketScan Research Database. Among patients diagnosed with psoriasis, less than 1% had a claim for a moderate/strong inducer, but up to 15% had a claim for moderate/strong inhibitor. Most prescriptions for CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers included antibiotics and anticonvulsants. While CYP3A4 inducers were rarely used, those treated received more than >90 days treatment. Then, these RWE data were used to inform the early translational medicine strategy for the new investigational drug by strategically integrating DDI evaluations into a first-in-human healthy volunteer trial prior to studies in patients with psoriasis. The resulting DDI substudy showed that the investigational small molecule did not induce midazolam clearance but was sensitive to CYP3A inhibition, leading to the decision to exclude concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors from clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683169/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Imatoh T, Sai K, Saito Y. The association between concurrence of infection and the onset of severe eruption or liver injury in patients using antipyretic analgesics: a matched, nested Case-Control study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60(9):1177-1184. doi:10.1002/jcph.1613
In variable “index year” within Table 3, the number of cases and controls were incorrect. A table with excerpts of the revised portions (“Index year”) is indicated below.
We apologize for this error.
Imatoh T, Sai K, Saito Y. 使用解热镇痛药的患者同时发生感染与严重溃疡或肝损伤之间的关联:一项匹配、巢式病例对照研究。J Clin Pharmacol.2020;60(9):1177-1184.DOI:10.1002/jcph.1613在表 3 中的变量 "指数年 "中,病例和对照组的数量有误。下面的表格摘录了修改后的部分("指数年")。 我们对此错误深表歉意。
{"title":"Correction to “The Association Between Concurrence of Infection and the Onset of Severe Eruption or Liver Injury in Patients Using Antipyretic Analgesics: A Matched, Nested Case-Control Study”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2497","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.2497","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Imatoh T, Sai K, Saito Y. The association between concurrence of infection and the onset of severe eruption or liver injury in patients using antipyretic analgesics: a matched, nested Case-Control study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;60(9):1177-1184. doi:10.1002/jcph.1613</p><p>In variable “index year” within Table 3, the number of cases and controls were incorrect. A table with excerpts of the revised portions (“Index year”) is indicated below.\u0000\u0000 </p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"64 10","pages":"1335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.2497","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Álef Machado Gomes Pego MA, Maria Paula Marques PhD, Fernanda de Lima Moreira PhD, Tiago Paz PhD, Maria Martha de Barros Tarozzo MA, Rogério Pereira Mattos MA, Patrícia Pereira dos Santos Melli PhD, MD, Geraldo Duarte PhD, MD, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli PhD, MD, Vera Lucia Lanchote PhD
This study investigates the influence of pregnancy on the in vivo activity of the intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and hepatic organic anion transporters polypeptide (OATP/BCRP) using, respectively, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin as probe drugs. Eleven healthy participants were investigated during the third trimester of pregnancy (Phase 1, 28 to 38 weeks of gestation) and in the postpartum period (Phase 2, 8 to 12 weeks postpartum). In both phases, after administration of a single oral dose of fexofenadine (60 mg) and rosuvastatin (5 mg), serial blood samples were collected for up to 24 h. Rosuvastatin and fexofenadine in plasma were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using previously validated methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (Phoenix WinNonLin software) with normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test) are presented as geometric mean and 90% confidence interval. Phases 1 and 2 were compared using the t test (P < .05). Fexofexadine AUC0-24 values do not differ (P-value: .0715) between Phase 1 (641.9 ng h/mL [500.6-823.1]) and Phase 2 (823.8 ng h/mL [641.5-1057.6]) showing that pregnancy (third trimester) does not alter intestinal P-gp activity. However, rosuvastatin AUC0-24 values are higher (P-value: .00005) in Phase 1 (18.7 ng h/mL [13.3-26.4]) when compared to Phase 2 (9.5 ng h/mL [6.7-13.4]), suggesting inhibition of OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters. In conclusion, pregnancy assessed during the third trimester does not alter the intestinal P-gp activity but reduces the activity of hepatic OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters. Therefore, adjustments in dosage regimens may be necessary for drugs with low therapeutic index, substrates of the OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters, administered during the third trimester of pregnancy.
{"title":"In Vivo Activity of Intestinal P-Glycoprotein and Hepatic Organic Anion Transporters Polypeptide in Pregnancy and Postpartum","authors":"Álef Machado Gomes Pego MA, Maria Paula Marques PhD, Fernanda de Lima Moreira PhD, Tiago Paz PhD, Maria Martha de Barros Tarozzo MA, Rogério Pereira Mattos MA, Patrícia Pereira dos Santos Melli PhD, MD, Geraldo Duarte PhD, MD, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli PhD, MD, Vera Lucia Lanchote PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6125","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6125","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the influence of pregnancy on the <i>in vivo</i> activity of the intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and hepatic organic anion transporters polypeptide (OATP/BCRP) using, respectively, fexofenadine and rosuvastatin as probe drugs. Eleven healthy participants were investigated during the third trimester of pregnancy (Phase 1, 28 to 38 weeks of gestation) and in the postpartum period (Phase 2, 8 to 12 weeks postpartum). In both phases, after administration of a single oral dose of fexofenadine (60 mg) and rosuvastatin (5 mg), serial blood samples were collected for up to 24 h. Rosuvastatin and fexofenadine in plasma were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using previously validated methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of fexofenadine and rosuvastatin (Phoenix WinNonLin software) with normal distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test) are presented as geometric mean and 90% confidence interval. Phases 1 and 2 were compared using the t test (<i>P</i> < .05). Fexofexadine AUC<sub>0-24</sub> values do not differ (<i>P-</i>value: .0715) between Phase 1 (641.9 ng h/mL [500.6-823.1]) and Phase 2 (823.8 ng h/mL [641.5-1057.6]) showing that pregnancy (third trimester) does not alter intestinal P-gp activity. However, rosuvastatin AUC<sub>0-24</sub> values are higher (<i>P-</i>value: .00005) in Phase 1 (18.7 ng h/mL [13.3-26.4]) when compared to Phase 2 (9.5 ng h/mL [6.7-13.4]), suggesting inhibition of OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters. In conclusion, pregnancy assessed during the third trimester does not alter the intestinal P-gp activity but reduces the activity of hepatic OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters. Therefore, adjustments in dosage regimens may be necessary for drugs with low therapeutic index, substrates of the OATP1B1/OATP1B3 transporters, administered during the third trimester of pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"7-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074280","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tyler C. Dunlap PharmD, Daniel Gonzalez PharmD, PhD, Kathryn E. Kyler MD, MS, Victória Etges Helfer PhD, Veronica Williams RN, CCRC, Chance S. Friesen BS, Nathan Artz PhD, Sherwin Chan MD, PhD, Valentina Shakhnovich MD
Pediatric obesity is a growing health concern, affecting millions of children worldwide. While pharmacokinetic (PK) changes in numerous commonly prescribed medications have been linked to obesity, the physiological mechanisms driving these alterations and their implications for drug dosing remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate previously reported observations of reduced pantoprazole clearance (CL) in children with obesity, investigate obesity-related characteristics in liver physiology as explanatory causes for these observations, and evaluate the clinical relevance of obesity on drug dosing. A prospective, comparative PK study, enrolling participants 6-21 years of age, with and without obesity, was conducted to evaluate the association between obesity-related characteristics and pantoprazole CL. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was used to identify sources of interindividual variability in pantoprazole PK. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess pantoprazole exposure in children and evaluate the association between obesity and pantoprazole exposure. The study population consisted of 39 pediatric participants: 31% without obesity and 69% with obesity. A two-compartment PK model with covariate effects of total body weight (TBW), CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, and obesity status adequately described the PK data. After accounting for differences due to TBW and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, obesity was associated with an estimated 18% reduction in pantoprazole CL (comparable to the reduction estimated for a CYP2C19 loss of function allele). Further research is warranted to evaluate the physiological mechanisms associated with reduced drug CL in children with increased body size and the implications for drug dosing.
{"title":"Evaluation of Obesity-Related Physiological Changes on Pantoprazole Clearance in Children Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Approach","authors":"Tyler C. Dunlap PharmD, Daniel Gonzalez PharmD, PhD, Kathryn E. Kyler MD, MS, Victória Etges Helfer PhD, Veronica Williams RN, CCRC, Chance S. Friesen BS, Nathan Artz PhD, Sherwin Chan MD, PhD, Valentina Shakhnovich MD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6122","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6122","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pediatric obesity is a growing health concern, affecting millions of children worldwide. While pharmacokinetic (PK) changes in numerous commonly prescribed medications have been linked to obesity, the physiological mechanisms driving these alterations and their implications for drug dosing remain poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate previously reported observations of reduced pantoprazole clearance (CL) in children with obesity, investigate obesity-related characteristics in liver physiology as explanatory causes for these observations, and evaluate the clinical relevance of obesity on drug dosing. A prospective, comparative PK study, enrolling participants 6-21 years of age, with and without obesity, was conducted to evaluate the association between obesity-related characteristics and pantoprazole CL. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was used to identify sources of interindividual variability in pantoprazole PK. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess pantoprazole exposure in children and evaluate the association between obesity and pantoprazole exposure. The study population consisted of 39 pediatric participants: 31% without obesity and 69% with obesity. A two-compartment PK model with covariate effects of total body weight (TBW), CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, and obesity status adequately described the PK data. After accounting for differences due to TBW and CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype, obesity was associated with an estimated 18% reduction in pantoprazole CL (comparable to the reduction estimated for a <i>CYP2C19</i> loss of function allele). Further research is warranted to evaluate the physiological mechanisms associated with reduced drug CL in children with increased body size and the implications for drug dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"108-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ofer Sadan MD, PhD, Yoo-Seong Jeong PhD, Shany Cohen-Sadan MD, Eashani Sathialingam PhD, Erin M. Buckley PhD, Prem A. Kandiah MD, Jonathan A. Grossberg MD, William Asbury PharmD, William J. Jusko PhD, Owen B. Samuels MD
<p>To the editor,</p><p>We appreciate the interest of Drs. Du and Chen in our recent manuscript describing a pharmacokinetic model for intermittent intrathecal nicardipine administration.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The authors mentioned a few details that were omitted from our manuscript. These omissions were primarily due to prioritizing critical details in a limited space. We are happy to use the current space to further shed light on our clinical investigation.</p><p>First, with regard to sample storage, the hourly cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (or plasma) samples were collected and initially stored on ice while protected from light. After completing the of sample collection for each dose tested, the entire set of samples was aliquoted and kept in a −80°C freezer. All the samples from all subjects in this cohort were measured as a single batch.</p><p>Second, the Du and Chen mention that we did not report certain patient outcomes. However, we clearly stated that the purpose of our study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of nicardipine in the CSF of a limited number of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Many of the clinical aspects of intrathecal (IT) nicardipine administration were reported previously in a larger, better powered cohort.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Reporting patient outcomes in an underpowered small cohort may lead to the misinterpretation of efficacy. Therefore, despite the encouraging clinical outcomes observed in the current cohort, we chose not to publish them herein. As noted in our manuscript, we agree that larger and more rigorously designed studies are needed in the future to develop an optimal dosing strategy for IT nicardipine based on integrative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) assessment of patient outcome data.</p><p>Third, Du and Chen mentioned a single center small cohort study that reported an alternative IT nicardipine administration approach using a cisternal drain.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Per this report, cisternal drain placement occurred during microsurgical clipping rather than during endovascular repair of the aneurysm as Du and Chen mistakenly stated. Since the endovascular approach is associated with improved patient outcomes (see International Subarachnoid Aneurysmal Trial [ISAT] <span><sup>4</sup></span>), it is unclear to us how mentioning the work of Vandenbulcke et al. in relationship to ours is relevant.</p><p>Furthermore, Du and Chen incorrectly claimed that q12hr dosing is the most common frequency for intrathecal nicardipine. This might be true at their center. Indeed, in a new clinical trial originated from The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China (FAST-IT trial, NCT06329635) this was the regimen chosen. However, prior to our report, a dose range of 2–10 mg q8hr or q6hr dosing was reported in 6 different papers involving 548 patients,<span><sup>2, 5-9</sup></span> while a dosing regimen of 4 mg q12hr was reported in 4 papers involving 192 patients.<
{"title":"Reply to: Comment: Cerebrospinal Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Nicardipine Following Intrathecal Administration in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients","authors":"Ofer Sadan MD, PhD, Yoo-Seong Jeong PhD, Shany Cohen-Sadan MD, Eashani Sathialingam PhD, Erin M. Buckley PhD, Prem A. Kandiah MD, Jonathan A. Grossberg MD, William Asbury PharmD, William J. Jusko PhD, Owen B. Samuels MD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6123","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6123","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the editor,</p><p>We appreciate the interest of Drs. Du and Chen in our recent manuscript describing a pharmacokinetic model for intermittent intrathecal nicardipine administration.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The authors mentioned a few details that were omitted from our manuscript. These omissions were primarily due to prioritizing critical details in a limited space. We are happy to use the current space to further shed light on our clinical investigation.</p><p>First, with regard to sample storage, the hourly cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (or plasma) samples were collected and initially stored on ice while protected from light. After completing the of sample collection for each dose tested, the entire set of samples was aliquoted and kept in a −80°C freezer. All the samples from all subjects in this cohort were measured as a single batch.</p><p>Second, the Du and Chen mention that we did not report certain patient outcomes. However, we clearly stated that the purpose of our study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of nicardipine in the CSF of a limited number of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Many of the clinical aspects of intrathecal (IT) nicardipine administration were reported previously in a larger, better powered cohort.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Reporting patient outcomes in an underpowered small cohort may lead to the misinterpretation of efficacy. Therefore, despite the encouraging clinical outcomes observed in the current cohort, we chose not to publish them herein. As noted in our manuscript, we agree that larger and more rigorously designed studies are needed in the future to develop an optimal dosing strategy for IT nicardipine based on integrative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) assessment of patient outcome data.</p><p>Third, Du and Chen mentioned a single center small cohort study that reported an alternative IT nicardipine administration approach using a cisternal drain.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Per this report, cisternal drain placement occurred during microsurgical clipping rather than during endovascular repair of the aneurysm as Du and Chen mistakenly stated. Since the endovascular approach is associated with improved patient outcomes (see International Subarachnoid Aneurysmal Trial [ISAT] <span><sup>4</sup></span>), it is unclear to us how mentioning the work of Vandenbulcke et al. in relationship to ours is relevant.</p><p>Furthermore, Du and Chen incorrectly claimed that q12hr dosing is the most common frequency for intrathecal nicardipine. This might be true at their center. Indeed, in a new clinical trial originated from The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China (FAST-IT trial, NCT06329635) this was the regimen chosen. However, prior to our report, a dose range of 2–10 mg q8hr or q6hr dosing was reported in 6 different papers involving 548 patients,<span><sup>2, 5-9</sup></span> while a dosing regimen of 4 mg q12hr was reported in 4 papers involving 192 patients.<","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"145-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.6123","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study aimed to develop a prostatic pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime and suggest more effective dosing strategy for the bacterial prostatitis, based on a site-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Subjects were prostatic hyperplasia patients prophylactically receiving a 0.5-h infusion of 1.0 g or 2.0 g ceftazidime before transurethral resection of the prostate. Plasma and prostate samples were premeditatedly collected after the administration and the concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The prostate tissue/plasma ratio in area under the drug concentration-time curve was approximately 0.476. The prostatic population pharmacokinetic model incorporated creatinine clearance (CLcr) into ceftazidime clearance was developed, and adequately predicted prostate tissue concentrations by diagnostic scatter plots and visual predictive checks. Aiming for a bactericidal target of 70% of time above minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) in prostate tissue, 2.0 g twice daily achieved ≥90% expected probability against main pathogens like Escherichia coli and Proteus species in patients regardless of renal function (CLcr = 60 and 90 mL/min). However, since the expected probability of attaining the bactericidal target of 0.5-h infusion dosing regimen did not achieve 90% against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with CLcr = 60 and 90 mL/min, 4-h infusion dosing regimen of 2.0 g three times daily (6 g/day) might be required for empirical treatment. Based on site-specific simulations, the present study provides more effective dosing strategy for bacterial prostatitis.
{"title":"Prostatic Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Ceftazidime: Dosing Strategy for Bacterial Prostatitis","authors":"Tetsushu Onita PhD, Kogenta Nakamura MD, Genya Nishikawa MD, Noriyuki Ishihara PhD, Hiroki Tamaki PhD, Takahisa Yano PhD, Kohji Naora PhD, Norifumi Morikawa PhD, Kazuro Ikawa PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6119","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to develop a prostatic pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime and suggest more effective dosing strategy for the bacterial prostatitis, based on a site-specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Subjects were prostatic hyperplasia patients prophylactically receiving a 0.5-h infusion of 1.0 g or 2.0 g ceftazidime before transurethral resection of the prostate. Plasma and prostate samples were premeditatedly collected after the administration and the concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The prostate tissue/plasma ratio in area under the drug concentration-time curve was approximately 0.476. The prostatic population pharmacokinetic model incorporated creatinine clearance (CL<sub>cr</sub>) into ceftazidime clearance was developed, and adequately predicted prostate tissue concentrations by diagnostic scatter plots and visual predictive checks. Aiming for a bactericidal target of 70% of time above minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) in prostate tissue, 2.0 g twice daily achieved ≥90% expected probability against main pathogens like <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Proteus</i> species in patients regardless of renal function (CL<sub>cr</sub> = 60 and 90 mL/min). However, since the expected probability of attaining the bactericidal target of 0.5-h infusion dosing regimen did not achieve 90% against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> in patients with CL<sub>cr</sub> = 60 and 90 mL/min, 4-h infusion dosing regimen of 2.0 g three times daily (6 g/day) might be required for empirical treatment. Based on site-specific simulations, the present study provides more effective dosing strategy for bacterial prostatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"121-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>To the Editor,</p><p>We recently read with great interest the article by Sadan et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> This study, using data from 16 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, successfully developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the nicardipine disposition kinetics in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following intrathecal (IT) administration. However, we noted that the authors may have overlooked several important factors during the execution of the study. We want to offer the following suggestions for the author's consideration.</p><p>First, there are issues concerning the details of sample collection, storage, and analysis. We observed discrepancies in the reported times of CSF and blood collection. Additionally, the storage conditions and analysis timing of the samples were not specified. Considering that CSF was collected hourly, up to 6 or 8 h, the authors should clarify whether the samples were stored at −80°C and analyzed collectively once all samples were collected. These details are crucial as they may affect the concentration measurements of nicardipine and the comparability of samples, which could impact the reliability of the experimental model.</p><p>Second, the study indicates that IT nicardipine may cause side effects such as hydrocephalus, leading to an increased need for CSF shunting procedures.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> However, the study did not mention the occurrence of hydrocephalus in these 16 patients in either the short or the long term. This omission limits the ability to analyze the correlation between CSF nicardipine concentrations and the incidence of hydrocephalus. Furthermore, as noted by the authors, there is not enough high-level evidence to support the improvement of SAH patient outcomes with IT nicardipine.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> However, the study lacks specific clinical outcome data for these 16 patients (e.g., neurological recovery and survival rates), which restricts the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings. These factors should be considered in future research designs.</p><p>Third, research suggests that cisternal nicardipine (CN) is more effective than the external ventricular drain (EVD) route, but the mechanism remains unclear.<span><sup>5</sup></span> CN is typically used in patients treated by coiling, while EVD is used for those treated by microsurgical clipping. We propose that the superior efficacy of nicardipine in patients treated with coiling compared to those undergoing microsurgical clipping may be due to the fact that the blood–brain barrier in the former is not disrupted, thereby preventing systemic hypotension from CSF nicardipine leakage. Future studies incorporating a CN group based on the study protocol of Sadan et al. could help validate this mechanism. Additionally, since every 12-h administration of 4 mg nicardipine is the most common dosing regimen, future research might consider this dosing scheme to avoid frequent IT administratio
{"title":"Comment: Cerebrospinal Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Nicardipine Following Intrathecal Administration in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients","authors":"Xiaolin Du MD, Guangtang Chen MD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6124","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6124","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To the Editor,</p><p>We recently read with great interest the article by Sadan et al.<span><sup>1</sup></span> This study, using data from 16 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, successfully developed a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the nicardipine disposition kinetics in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following intrathecal (IT) administration. However, we noted that the authors may have overlooked several important factors during the execution of the study. We want to offer the following suggestions for the author's consideration.</p><p>First, there are issues concerning the details of sample collection, storage, and analysis. We observed discrepancies in the reported times of CSF and blood collection. Additionally, the storage conditions and analysis timing of the samples were not specified. Considering that CSF was collected hourly, up to 6 or 8 h, the authors should clarify whether the samples were stored at −80°C and analyzed collectively once all samples were collected. These details are crucial as they may affect the concentration measurements of nicardipine and the comparability of samples, which could impact the reliability of the experimental model.</p><p>Second, the study indicates that IT nicardipine may cause side effects such as hydrocephalus, leading to an increased need for CSF shunting procedures.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> However, the study did not mention the occurrence of hydrocephalus in these 16 patients in either the short or the long term. This omission limits the ability to analyze the correlation between CSF nicardipine concentrations and the incidence of hydrocephalus. Furthermore, as noted by the authors, there is not enough high-level evidence to support the improvement of SAH patient outcomes with IT nicardipine.<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> However, the study lacks specific clinical outcome data for these 16 patients (e.g., neurological recovery and survival rates), which restricts the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings. These factors should be considered in future research designs.</p><p>Third, research suggests that cisternal nicardipine (CN) is more effective than the external ventricular drain (EVD) route, but the mechanism remains unclear.<span><sup>5</sup></span> CN is typically used in patients treated by coiling, while EVD is used for those treated by microsurgical clipping. We propose that the superior efficacy of nicardipine in patients treated with coiling compared to those undergoing microsurgical clipping may be due to the fact that the blood–brain barrier in the former is not disrupted, thereby preventing systemic hypotension from CSF nicardipine leakage. Future studies incorporating a CN group based on the study protocol of Sadan et al. could help validate this mechanism. Additionally, since every 12-h administration of 4 mg nicardipine is the most common dosing regimen, future research might consider this dosing scheme to avoid frequent IT administratio","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"143-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.6124","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142047364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Loratadine is metabolized to desloratadine. Both of them have been used for allergy treatment in children. Anatomical, physiological, and biological parameters of children and clearance of drugs vary with age. We aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of loratadine and desloratadine in children. Following validation using 11 adult data sets, the developed PBPK model was extrapolated to children. Plasma concentrations following oral loratadine or desloratadine to children of different ages were simulated and compared with six children data sets. After scaling anatomy/physiology, protein binding, and clearance, pharmacokinetics of the two drugs in pediatric populations were satisfactorily predicted. Most of the observed concentrations fell within the 5th-95th percentile range of the simulations in 1000 virtual children. The predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and Cmax fell within 0.5-2.0-fold range of the observations. Oral doses of loratadine or desloratadine for children of different ages were simulated based on similar AUCs following 10 mg of loratadine or 5 mg of desloratadine for adults. Pediatric PBPK model was successfully developed to simultaneously predict plasma concentrations of loratadine and desloratadine in children of all ages. The developed pediatric PBPK model may also be applied to optimize pediatric dosage.
{"title":"Simultaneously Predicting Pharmacokinetics of Loratadine and Desloratadine in Children Using a Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model","authors":"Tianlei Liu MD, Ruijing Mu PhD, Xiaodong Liu PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6120","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6120","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Loratadine is metabolized to desloratadine. Both of them have been used for allergy treatment in children. Anatomical, physiological, and biological parameters of children and clearance of drugs vary with age. We aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of loratadine and desloratadine in children. Following validation using 11 adult data sets, the developed PBPK model was extrapolated to children. Plasma concentrations following oral loratadine or desloratadine to children of different ages were simulated and compared with six children data sets. After scaling anatomy/physiology, protein binding, and clearance, pharmacokinetics of the two drugs in pediatric populations were satisfactorily predicted. Most of the observed concentrations fell within the 5th-95th percentile range of the simulations in 1000 virtual children. The predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and C<sub>max</sub> fell within 0.5-2.0-fold range of the observations. Oral doses of loratadine or desloratadine for children of different ages were simulated based on similar AUCs following 10 mg of loratadine or 5 mg of desloratadine for adults. Pediatric PBPK model was successfully developed to simultaneously predict plasma concentrations of loratadine and desloratadine in children of all ages. The developed pediatric PBPK model may also be applied to optimize pediatric dosage.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"74-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giorgio Senaldi MD, PhD, Aparna Mohan MD, PhD, Li Zhang MD, PhD, FCP, Jun Tanaka PhD, Yong Lin PhD, Grishma Pandya BS, Sindee Grossman BA, Sarah Urbina MS, Steven H. Reynolds DO, Alan H. Hand MD
Toll-like receptor (TLR)7 is a pattern recognition receptor that critically contributes to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). DS-7011a is an anti-TLR7 monoclonal antibody that prevents TLR7 from signaling. The aim of this first-in-human, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of DS-7011a in healthy subjects (HS) (NCT05203692). On day 1, 80 HS received DS-7011a or placebo 6:2 in 10 cohorts (7 treated IV and 3 SC) of 8 each and were followed for 8 weeks until day 57. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pharmacokinetics by measuring plasma DS-7011a, immunogenicity by measuring plasma anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and pharmacodynamics by evaluating the suppression of interleukin-6 production ex vivo in whole blood. DS-7011a was safe and well tolerated across all cohorts. TEAEs were mostly mild in severity and not drug-related. DS-7011a exposure increased with the dose but was not dose proportional, as the elimination of lower doses was accelerated by target-mediated drug disposition. Terminal half-life was about 15-17 days and Tmax upon SC administration was about 5 days. DS-7011a induced ADAs in about half of HS but with no impact on clinical findings and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamic (PD) response also increased with the dose and at the higher doses was of large extent (>90%), early onset, and lasting duration. DS-7011a showed favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and PD properties that support its development for the treatment of SLE.
{"title":"First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, and Pharmacodynamics of DS-7011a, an Anti-TLR7 Antagonistic Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus","authors":"Giorgio Senaldi MD, PhD, Aparna Mohan MD, PhD, Li Zhang MD, PhD, FCP, Jun Tanaka PhD, Yong Lin PhD, Grishma Pandya BS, Sindee Grossman BA, Sarah Urbina MS, Steven H. Reynolds DO, Alan H. Hand MD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6117","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6117","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Toll-like receptor (TLR)7 is a pattern recognition receptor that critically contributes to the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). DS-7011a is an anti-TLR7 monoclonal antibody that prevents TLR7 from signaling. The aim of this first-in-human, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of DS-7011a in healthy subjects (HS) (NCT05203692). On day 1, 80 HS received DS-7011a or placebo 6:2 in 10 cohorts (7 treated IV and 3 SC) of 8 each and were followed for 8 weeks until day 57. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), pharmacokinetics by measuring plasma DS-7011a, immunogenicity by measuring plasma anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and pharmacodynamics by evaluating the suppression of interleukin-6 production ex vivo in whole blood. DS-7011a was safe and well tolerated across all cohorts. TEAEs were mostly mild in severity and not drug-related. DS-7011a exposure increased with the dose but was not dose proportional, as the elimination of lower doses was accelerated by target-mediated drug disposition. Terminal half-life was about 15-17 days and T<sub>max</sub> upon SC administration was about 5 days. DS-7011a induced ADAs in about half of HS but with no impact on clinical findings and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamic (PD) response also increased with the dose and at the higher doses was of large extent (>90%), early onset, and lasting duration. DS-7011a showed favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and PD properties that support its development for the treatment of SLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"41-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jing Zhang MD, PhD, Guoying Cao MD, Yong Huo MD, Liana L. Guarneiri PhD, RDN, Marc Ditmarsch MD, John J. P. Kastelein MD, PhD, Douglas Kling MBA, Andrew Hsieh PharmD, Erin Wuerdeman MS, Michael H. Davidson MD
Obicetrapib is a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor. Previous research has demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic (PK) responses to single doses of obicetrapib between Japanese and White males, but the PK responses have not been established in Chinese individuals. The purpose of this randomized, parallel, open-label trial was to characterize the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD; CETP activity and plasma lipids) responses and safety of single doses (5, 10, or 25 mg; N = 36) and multiple doses (10 mg for 14 days; N = 12) of obicetrapib in healthy Chinese individuals. The maximum concentration and area under the drug concentration-time curve of obicetrapib from 0 h to infinity increased with dose after all single doses of obicetrapib. After 7 consecutive days of dosing, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reached their minimum and maximum changes of 42% reduction and 108% increase, respectively. Primary PK and PD parameters after single- and multiple-dose administration of obicetrapib were similar to those in healthy white participants in previous studies. One participant in the 5 mg dose group experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event of decreased white blood cell and neutrophil counts, which resolved without intervention. In conclusion, these findings support the inclusion of Chinese individuals in the ongoing phase 3 clinical development program of obicetrapib.
{"title":"A Randomized, Parallel, Open-Label, Single-Dose and Multiple-Dose Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Profiles of Obicetrapib in Healthy Participants in China","authors":"Jing Zhang MD, PhD, Guoying Cao MD, Yong Huo MD, Liana L. Guarneiri PhD, RDN, Marc Ditmarsch MD, John J. P. Kastelein MD, PhD, Douglas Kling MBA, Andrew Hsieh PharmD, Erin Wuerdeman MS, Michael H. Davidson MD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.6121","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jcph.6121","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Obicetrapib is a selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor. Previous research has demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic (PK) responses to single doses of obicetrapib between Japanese and White males, but the PK responses have not been established in Chinese individuals. The purpose of this randomized, parallel, open-label trial was to characterize the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD; CETP activity and plasma lipids) responses and safety of single doses (5, 10, or 25 mg; N = 36) and multiple doses (10 mg for 14 days; N = 12) of obicetrapib in healthy Chinese individuals. The maximum concentration and area under the drug concentration-time curve of obicetrapib from 0 h to infinity increased with dose after all single doses of obicetrapib. After 7 consecutive days of dosing, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reached their minimum and maximum changes of 42% reduction and 108% increase, respectively. Primary PK and PD parameters after single- and multiple-dose administration of obicetrapib were similar to those in healthy white participants in previous studies. One participant in the 5 mg dose group experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event of decreased white blood cell and neutrophil counts, which resolved without intervention. In conclusion, these findings support the inclusion of Chinese individuals in the ongoing phase 3 clinical development program of obicetrapib.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"65 1","pages":"96-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683177/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142001112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}