World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery最新文献

Background: Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Traditional open surgery for gastric cancer is often associated with significant morbidity and prolonged recovery.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery as an alternative to traditional open surgery for gastric cancer, focusing on its potential to reduce trauma, accelerate recovery, and achieve comparable oncological outcomes.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at the Shanghai Health Medical College Affiliated Chongming Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: Minimally invasive surgery group (n = 102), who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, and open surgery group (n = 101), who underwent traditional open gastrectomy. We compared surgical indicators (surgical incision size, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and number of lymph nodes dissected), recovery parameters (time to first flatus, time to start eating, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay), immune function (levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM), intestinal barrier function (levels of D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase), and stress response (levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin).

Results: The minimally invasive surgery group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of surgical indicators, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, shorter surgery time, and more lymph nodes dissected (P < 0.05 for all). Recovery was also faster in the minimally invasive surgery group, with earlier return of bowel function, earlier initiation of diet, quicker mobilization, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had better preserved immune function, superior intestinal barrier function, and a less pronounced stress response postoperatively (P < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer not only provides superior surgical indicators and faster recovery but also offers advantages in preserving immune function, protecting intestinal barrier function, and mitigating the stress response compared to traditional open surgery. These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in the management of gastric cancer.

Background: The abdominal perineal resection (APR), historically referred to as Mile's procedure, stands as a time-honored surgical intervention for rectal cancer management. Advancements in surgical techniques and the advent of neoadjuvant therapies have significantly improved the rate of sphincter preservation among patients afflicted with rectal cancer, including those with ultralow rectal cancer. Despite these improvements, APR maintains its irreplaceable role in the clinical landscape, particularly for cases involving low rectal cancer with encroachment on the external anal sphincter or levator ani muscles. Optimal perineal exposure stands as a pivotal phase in APR, given that the precision of this maneuver is directly correlated with both the safety of the surgery and the patient's subsequent long-term prognosis.

Aim: To evaluate the value of Lone-Star retractor (LSR) perineal exposure method in the treatment for laparoscopic APR of rectal cancer.

Methods: We reviewed the records of 38 patients with rectal cancer at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023, including 20 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a LSR perineal exposure method (LSR group) and 18 patients who underwent the APR procedure with a conventional perineal exposure method (control group). In the LSR group, following incision of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, the LSR was placed and dynamically adjusted according to the surgical plane to fully expose the perineal operative field.

Results: A total of 38 patients underwent laparoscopic APR, none of whom were found to have distant metastasis upon intraoperative exploration. Perineal blood loss, the postoperative hospital stays and the wound pain scores in the LSR group were significantly lower than those in the control group. A single surgeon completed the perineal operation significantly more often in the LSR group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of infection via the perineal incision in the LSR group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). No cases of distant metastasis or local recurrence were found among the patients at the postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion: The application of the LSR technique might be helpful for performing perineal exposure during APR for rectal cancer and could reduce the incidence of perineal complications, shorten the postoperative hospital stay, improve postoperative pain, and allow one surgeon to perform the perineal operation.

Background: The incidence and mortality rates of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are high, and the conventional treatment is radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE); however, the 3-year survival rate is still low. Further, there are no visual methods to effectively predict their prognosis.

Aim: To explore the factors influencing the prognosis of HCC after RFA and TACE and develop a nomogram prediction model.

Methods: Clinical and follow-up information of 150 patients with HCC treated using RFA and TACE in the Hangzhou Linping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from May 2020 to December 2022 was retrospectively collected and recorded. We examined their prognostic factors using multivariate logistic regression and created a nomogram prognosis prediction model using the R software (version 4.1.2). Internal verification was performed using the bootstrapping technique. The prognostic efficacy of the nomogram prediction model was evaluated using the concordance index (CI), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Of the 150 patients treated with RFA and TACE, 92 (61.33%) developed recurrence and metastasis. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables, and a predictive model was created. The internal validation results of the model showed a CI of 0.882. The correction curve trend of the prognosis prediction model was always near the diagonal, and the mean absolute error before and after internal validation was 0.021. The area under the curve of the prediction model after internal verification was 0.882 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.820-0.945], with a specificity of 0.828 and sensitivity of 0.656. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, χ ² = 3.552 and P = 0.895. The predictive model demonstrated a satisfactory calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical applicability.

Conclusion: The prognosis of patients with HCC after RFA and TACE is affected by several factors. The developed prediction model based on the influencing parameters shows a good prognosis predictive efficacy.

Background: Gastric cancer is associated with significant undernutrition responsible for an increase in morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of enteral nutrition by jejunostomy feeding in patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer.

Methods: Between 2003 and 2017, all patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer treatment were included retrospectively. A group with jejunostomy (J + group) and a group without jejunostomy (J - group) were compared.

Results: Of the 172 patients included, 60 received jejunostomy. Preoperatively, the two groups were comparable with respect to the nutritional parameters studied (body mass index, albumin, etc.). In the postoperative period, the J + group lost less weight and albumin: 5.74 ± 8.4 vs 9.86 ± 7.5 kg (P = 0.07) and 7.2 ± 5.6 vs 14.7 ± 12.7 g/L (P = 0.16), respectively. Overall morbidity was 25% in the J + group and 36.6% in the J - group (P = 0.12). The J + group had fewer respiratory, infectious, and grade 3 complications: 0% vs 5.4% (P = 0.09), 1.2% vs 9.3% (P = 0.03), and 0% vs 4.7% (P = 0.05), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6.7% in the J + group and 6.3% in the J - group (P = 0.91).

Conclusion: Jejunostomy feeding after gastrectomy improves nutritional characteristics and decreases postoperative morbidity. A prospective study could confirm our results.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents challenges due to its high recurrence and metastasis rates and poor prognosis. While current clinical diagnostic and prognostic indicators exist, their accuracy remains imperfect due to their biological complexity. Therefore, there is a quest to identify improved biomarkers for HCC diagnosis and prognosis. By combining long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression and somatic mutations, Duan et al identified five representative lncRNAs from 88 lncRNAs related to genomic instability (GI), forming a GI-derived lncRNA signature (LncSig). This signature outperforms previously reported LncSig and TP53 mutations in predicting HCC prognosis. In this editorial, we comprehensively evaluate the clinical application value of such prognostic evaluation model based on sequencing technology in terms of cost, time, and practicability. Additionally, we provide an overview of various prognostic models for HCC, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of research progress in prognostic evaluation methods.

Background: Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is a condition manifesting with pain caused by strangulation of the anterior cutaneous branch of the lower intercostal nerves. This case report aims to provide new insight into the selection of peripheral nerve blocks for the ACNES treatment.

Case summary: A 66-year-old woman manifested ACNES after a robot-assisted distal gastrectomy. An ultrasound-guided rectal sheath block was effective for pain triggered by the port scar. However, the sudden severe pain, which radiated laterally from the previous site, remained. A transversus abdominis plane block was performed for the remaining pain and effectively relieved it.

Conclusion: In this case, the trocar port was inserted between the rectus and transverse abdominis muscles. The intercostal nerves might have been entrapped on both sides of the rectus and transversus abdominis muscles. Hence, rectus sheath and transverse abdominis plane blocks were required to achieve complete pain relief. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on use of a combination of rectus sheath and transverse abdominis plane blocks for pain relief in ACNES.

Multivisceral resection and/or pelvic exenteration represents the only potential curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, it poses significant technical challenges, which account for the high risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. As complete histopathologic resection is the most important determinant of patient outcomes, LARC often requires an extended resection beyond the total mesorectal excision plane to obtain clear resection margins. In an era when laparoscopic surgery and robot-assisted surgery are becoming commonplace, the optimal approach to extensive pelvic interventions remains controversial. However, acceptance of the suitability of minimally invasive surgery is slowly gaining traction. Nonetheless, there is still a lack of evidence in the literature about minimally invasive approaches in multiple and extensive surgical resections, highlighting the need for research studies to explore, validate, and develop this issue. This editorial aims to provide a critical overview of the currently available applications and challenges of minimally invasive abdominopelvic surgery for LARC. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments in the field of robotic surgery for LARC, with a specific focus on new innovations and emerging frontiers.

Liver cancer represents a grave hepatic condition and constitutes a significant global health concern. Surgical resection remains the principal therapeutic modality for liver cancer. Nevertheless, perioperative malnutrition exerts a notable impact on patients with liver cancer, emerging as an independent risk factor for disease mortality and adverse outcomes. Hence, precise nutritional diagnosis and timely nutritional support hold the potential to enhance therapeutic efficacy and quality of life for liver cancer patients. This study represents a meticulous foray into the literature, extracting data from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases, with a focus on the past 5 years. It scrutinizes the impact of malnutrition on patients undergoing liver cancer surgery, the etiological underpinnings of malnutrition within this patient cohort, the critical assessment of perioperative nutritional status, and the strategic approaches to nutritional support. Utilizing rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, the amassed scholarly works are meticulously synthesized, methodically organized, and categorically elaborated upon. Ultimately, the authors propose the incorporation of a multidisciplinary nutrition management team during the perioperative period, comprising nutritionists, pharmacists, physicians, nurses, psychologists, and rehabilitation therapists, among other specialized professionals. Together, they collaborate to devise and implement personalized nutritional support plans, monitor patients' nutritional status, and make necessary adjustments as required. Through comprehensive management and intervention, improvements in the nutritional status of liver cancer patients can be achieved, thereby enhancing surgical success rates and facilitating postoperative recovery. It is believed that this manuscript will offer valuable insights to advance the nutritional management during the perioperative phase of liver cancer, aiding in ameliorating patients' nutritional status and treatment outcomes.

Background: Colon cancer presents a substantial risk to the well-being of elderly people worldwide. With advancements in medical technology, surgical treatment has become the primary approach for managing colon cancer patients. However, due to age-related physiological changes, especially a decline in cognitive function, older patients are more susceptible to the effects of surgery and anesthesia, increasing the relative risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Therefore, in the surgical treatment of elderly patients with colon cancer, it is of paramount importance to select an appropriate anesthetic approach to reduce the occurrence of POCD, protect brain function, and improve surgical success rates.

Aim: To explore the value of dexmedetomidine (Dex) in anesthesia for elderly patients undergoing radical colon cancer surgery.

Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with colon cancer who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia were selected and divided into two groups: A and B. Group A received Dex before anesthesia induction, and B group received an equivalent amount of normal saline. Changes in the mini-mental state examination, regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), bispectral index, glucose uptake rate (GluER), lactate production rate (LacPR), serum S100β and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), POCD, and adverse anesthesia reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results: Surgical duration, duration of anesthesia, and intraoperative blood loss were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). The overall dosage of anesthetic drugs used in group A, including propofol and remifentanil, was significantly lower than that used in group B (P < 0.05). Group A exhibited higher rSO2 values at the time of endotracheal intubation, 30 min after the start of surgery, and immediately after extubation, higher GluER values and lower LacPR values at the time of endotracheal intubation, 30 min after the start of surgery, immediately after extubation, and 5 min after extubation (P < 0.05). Group A exhibited lower levels of serum S100β and NSE 24 h postoperatively and a lower incidence of cognitive dysfunction on the 1st and 5th postoperative days (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of Dex in elderly patients undergoing radical colon cancer surgery helps maintain rSO2 Levels and reduce cerebral metabolic levels and the incidence of anesthesia- and surgery-induced cognitive dysfunction.