Pub Date : 2019-06-17DOI: 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.100
Jared C. Quinn
Congress Should Have an Interest in This Interest
国会应该对这种利益感兴趣
{"title":"Congress Should Have an Interest in This Interest","authors":"Jared C. Quinn","doi":"10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.100","url":null,"abstract":"Congress Should Have an Interest in This Interest","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132646937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-17DOI: 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.93
Åsa Gunnarsson
Strategies to Materialize Gender Equality in Tax Law and Doctrine: Rewritten Tax Opinions
性别平等在税收法律和原则中的实现策略:改写税收意见
{"title":"Strategies to Materialize Gender Equality in Tax Law and Doctrine: Rewritten Tax Opinions","authors":"Åsa Gunnarsson","doi":"10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.93","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.93","url":null,"abstract":"Strategies to Materialize Gender Equality in Tax Law and Doctrine: Rewritten Tax Opinions","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134500516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-17DOI: 10.5195/taxreview.2019.95
D. Klein
United States v. Davis and Prof. Cain’s Rewritten Opinion: An Intersectional Argument for Capping Section 1041
美国诉戴维斯和凯恩教授的重写意见:限制第1041条的交叉论证
{"title":"United States v. Davis and Prof. Cain’s Rewritten Opinion: An Intersectional Argument for Capping Section 1041","authors":"D. Klein","doi":"10.5195/taxreview.2019.95","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/taxreview.2019.95","url":null,"abstract":"United States v. Davis and Prof. Cain’s Rewritten Opinion: An Intersectional Argument for Capping Section 1041","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124638646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-17DOI: 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.99
J. Balogh
Holistic Tax Reform: Procedure, the Missing Companion to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s Substantive Law Focus
整体税制改革:程序——《减税与就业法案》实体法焦点缺失的伴侣
{"title":"Holistic Tax Reform: Procedure, the Missing Companion to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s Substantive Law Focus","authors":"J. Balogh","doi":"10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.99","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.99","url":null,"abstract":"Holistic Tax Reform: Procedure, the Missing Companion to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s Substantive Law Focus","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130367776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-06-17DOI: 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.92
Ann Mumford
“Rhiannon O’Donnabhain Is a Taxpayer”: Tax and the Social Contract in O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner
“Rhiannon O 'Donnabhain是一个纳税人”:O 'Donnabhain诉专员案中的税收与社会契约
{"title":"“Rhiannon O’Donnabhain Is a Taxpayer”: Tax and the Social Contract in O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner","authors":"Ann Mumford","doi":"10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.92","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2019.92","url":null,"abstract":"“Rhiannon O’Donnabhain Is a Taxpayer”: Tax and the Social Contract in O’Donnabhain v. Commissioner","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115320339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-02-11DOI: 10.5195/taxreview.2018.80
L. Hitt
Rethinking the Obvious: Choice of Entity After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
重新思考显而易见的:减税和就业法案后的实体选择
{"title":"Rethinking the Obvious: Choice of Entity After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act","authors":"L. Hitt","doi":"10.5195/taxreview.2018.80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/taxreview.2018.80","url":null,"abstract":"Rethinking the Obvious: Choice of Entity After the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131035276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2019-02-11DOI: 10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2018.82
Michael Bauer
Protecting the (Tax) Base: Anti–Base Erosion Provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
保护(税基):《减税与就业法案》中的反税基侵蚀条款
{"title":"Protecting the (Tax) Base: Anti–Base Erosion Provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act","authors":"Michael Bauer","doi":"10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2018.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5195/TAXREVIEW.2018.82","url":null,"abstract":"Protecting the (Tax) Base: Anti–Base Erosion Provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act","PeriodicalId":237834,"journal":{"name":"Pittsburgh Tax Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117225775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：