Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05292-8
Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt, Anna Goujon, Juliette Cotte, Arthur Peyrottes, Gaelle Margue, Georges Mjaess, Stephan Levy, Pierre Luc Dequirez, William Berchiche, Guillaume Joussen, Alice Pitout, Vassili Anastay, Claire Deleuze, Benoit Mesnard, Denis Seguier, Fayek Taha, Kevin Kaulanjan
Purpose: The objective of this scoping review was to identify the topics of research and the types of studies published by the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF) since it was created, 35 years ago and to perform a bibliometric analysis.
Methods: A scoping review on PubMed, Google scholar, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) was conducted from 1989 until the 31st of December 2023. The PRISMA extended guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. Articles were independently screened and analyzed by two reviewers. The theme type, primary results, language of publication, number of male and female authors and number of citations from each included article were extracted.
Results: A total of 32 articles were included among which 17 surveys and 11 cohort studies. There was a median percentage of 20% women among authors. Fifteen articles (47%) were published in French and 17 articles in English. The median number of citations was 4.5. The topics covered were urologist in training's surgical education, well-being, professional practice, and urologic emergencies: renal trauma and spermatic cord torsion. The creation of large national databases enabled the generation of multiple studies focusing on previously under-represented topics.
Conclusion: Over the 35 years since it was created, The AFUF has had an interesting and prolific scientific output. It has shown its concerns for urologists in training.
{"title":"Thirty-five years of the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF) a scoping review and bibliometric analysis of scientific literature conducted by urologists in training.","authors":"Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt, Anna Goujon, Juliette Cotte, Arthur Peyrottes, Gaelle Margue, Georges Mjaess, Stephan Levy, Pierre Luc Dequirez, William Berchiche, Guillaume Joussen, Alice Pitout, Vassili Anastay, Claire Deleuze, Benoit Mesnard, Denis Seguier, Fayek Taha, Kevin Kaulanjan","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05292-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05292-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this scoping review was to identify the topics of research and the types of studies published by the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF) since it was created, 35 years ago and to perform a bibliometric analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review on PubMed, Google scholar, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) was conducted from 1989 until the 31st of December 2023. The PRISMA extended guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. Articles were independently screened and analyzed by two reviewers. The theme type, primary results, language of publication, number of male and female authors and number of citations from each included article were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 articles were included among which 17 surveys and 11 cohort studies. There was a median percentage of 20% women among authors. Fifteen articles (47%) were published in French and 17 articles in English. The median number of citations was 4.5. The topics covered were urologist in training's surgical education, well-being, professional practice, and urologic emergencies: renal trauma and spermatic cord torsion. The creation of large national databases enabled the generation of multiple studies focusing on previously under-represented topics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the 35 years since it was created, The AFUF has had an interesting and prolific scientific output. It has shown its concerns for urologists in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142576883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05335-0
Christopher Anderson, Theodoros Spinos, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Anja Dietel, Toni Franz, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Purpose: Due to its biological properties, the omentum is a very useful tool in the hands of reconstructive urologists. The purpose of this systematic review is to present all existing evidence regarding the use of omentum during different robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgeries.
Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) were systematically screened. The following search string was used: (omentum OR omental) AND robotic. Retrospective studies and case-series were included, while case-reports were not included.
Results: 13 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. Seven studies reported robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair, two studies reported robotic vesicouterine or vesicocervical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectovesical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectourethral fistula repair, one study reported ureterolysis with omental wrap and one study reported robotic repair of long ureteral strictures with omental wrap and autologous onlay flap or graft ureteroplasty. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 6.7%. The Grade I-II complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification ranged from 0 to 40%, while no Grade III-IV were reported.
Conclusion: Robotic repair with the use of omentum is potentially a feasible, safe and efficient approach for complicated urological surgeries, such as vesicovaginal, vesicouterine, vaginocervical, rectovesical and rectourethral fistulas, idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and long ureteral strictures. Because the evidence is based on small case series, further publications are needed to enhance confidence in omental harvesting and render it a routine component of reconstructive Urology.
{"title":"Use of omentum during robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgery: a systematic review of the current literature.","authors":"Christopher Anderson, Theodoros Spinos, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis, Vasileios Tatanis, Anja Dietel, Toni Franz, Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05335-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00345-024-05335-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to its biological properties, the omentum is a very useful tool in the hands of reconstructive urologists. The purpose of this systematic review is to present all existing evidence regarding the use of omentum during different robotic-assisted reconstructive urological surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) were systematically screened. The following search string was used: (omentum OR omental) AND robotic. Retrospective studies and case-series were included, while case-reports were not included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in final qualitative synthesis. Seven studies reported robotic vesicovaginal fistula repair, two studies reported robotic vesicouterine or vesicocervical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectovesical fistula repair, one study reported robotic rectourethral fistula repair, one study reported ureterolysis with omental wrap and one study reported robotic repair of long ureteral strictures with omental wrap and autologous onlay flap or graft ureteroplasty. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 6.7%. The Grade I-II complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification ranged from 0 to 40%, while no Grade III-IV were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic repair with the use of omentum is potentially a feasible, safe and efficient approach for complicated urological surgeries, such as vesicovaginal, vesicouterine, vaginocervical, rectovesical and rectourethral fistulas, idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis and long ureteral strictures. Because the evidence is based on small case series, further publications are needed to enhance confidence in omental harvesting and render it a routine component of reconstructive Urology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"620"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-04DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05328-z
Kamil Malshy, Thomas Osinski, Trevor C Hunt, Jean Joseph
{"title":"Letter to the editor: transrectal versus transperineal prostate fusion biopsy-a pair-matched analysis to evaluate accuracy and complications.","authors":"Kamil Malshy, Thomas Osinski, Trevor C Hunt, Jean Joseph","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05328-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05328-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"622"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Although weight loss is known to alleviate urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms, the effects of sex and body size on this relationship remain insufficiently explored.
Materials and methods: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018, comprising 28,161 participants. Weighted logistic regression analysis, fitted curves, and subgroup analysis were used to assess the association between the percentage of weight loss and UI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounding factors.
Results: After PSM, multivariate logistic regression showed an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-0.99). Compared with weight loss percentages < 0%, the risk of UI significantly decreased with weight loss percentages > 5% (weight loss percentage 5.1-10%: OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00; weight loss percentage 10.1-15%: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97; weight loss percentage > 15%: OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.70). Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that this relationship was more significant in males and non-overweight/non-obese populations.
Conclusion: There was an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk, with noticeable differences based on sex and body size. However, these findings warrant further investigation.
{"title":"Impact of weight loss on the risk of urinary incontinence: the role of sex and body type.","authors":"Feng Chen, Hao Lin, Yuansi Zhang, Yu Zhang, Maoping Chu, Lulu Pan","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05333-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05333-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although weight loss is known to alleviate urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms, the effects of sex and body size on this relationship remain insufficiently explored.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2018, comprising 28,161 participants. Weighted logistic regression analysis, fitted curves, and subgroup analysis were used to assess the association between the percentage of weight loss and UI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, multivariate logistic regression showed an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-0.99). Compared with weight loss percentages < 0%, the risk of UI significantly decreased with weight loss percentages > 5% (weight loss percentage 5.1-10%: OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00; weight loss percentage 10.1-15%: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97; weight loss percentage > 15%: OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.70). Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that this relationship was more significant in males and non-overweight/non-obese populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was an inverse relationship between weight loss percentage and UI risk, with noticeable differences based on sex and body size. However, these findings warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05329-y
Zeyu Han, Yaxiong Tang, Xianyanling Yi, Jin Li, Jianzhong Ai
Purpose: To compare the oncological outcomes between standard radical cystectomy (SRC) and organ-sparing cystectomy (OSC) in male patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.
Methods: Patients with stage Ta-T3 bladder cancer who underwent OSC or SRC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. The association between preoperative factors and the implementation of OSC was analyzed using logistic regression. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Patients' overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses based on the T stage were also conducted.
Results: A total of 7264 patients were included, with 96.8% (7033 patients) receiving SRC and 3.2% (231 patients) receiving OSC. Patients with higher T stages and high-grade tumors were less likely to undergo OSC. After PSM, OSC was associated with significantly worse OS and CSS than SRC. Subgroup analysis revealed that OSC did not lead to worse OS and CSS in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and T2 stage patients, but it resulted in significantly worse outcomes in T3 stage patients.
Conclusion: Our study indicates that OSC is associated with poorer oncological outcomes compared to SRC, particularly in patients with advanced-stage tumors. These findings suggest the need for stringent selection criteria for OSC in bladder cancer patients. Given the negative impact on prognosis, stage T3 should potentially be considered a contraindication for OSC. Further evidence is required to confirm these assertions.
{"title":"Oncological outcomes of organ-sparing cystectomy versus standard radical cystectomy in male patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.","authors":"Zeyu Han, Yaxiong Tang, Xianyanling Yi, Jin Li, Jianzhong Ai","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05329-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05329-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the oncological outcomes between standard radical cystectomy (SRC) and organ-sparing cystectomy (OSC) in male patients diagnosed with bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with stage Ta-T3 bladder cancer who underwent OSC or SRC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. The association between preoperative factors and the implementation of OSC was analyzed using logistic regression. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance baseline characteristics between the two groups. Patients' overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses based on the T stage were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7264 patients were included, with 96.8% (7033 patients) receiving SRC and 3.2% (231 patients) receiving OSC. Patients with higher T stages and high-grade tumors were less likely to undergo OSC. After PSM, OSC was associated with significantly worse OS and CSS than SRC. Subgroup analysis revealed that OSC did not lead to worse OS and CSS in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and T2 stage patients, but it resulted in significantly worse outcomes in T3 stage patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that OSC is associated with poorer oncological outcomes compared to SRC, particularly in patients with advanced-stage tumors. These findings suggest the need for stringent selection criteria for OSC in bladder cancer patients. Given the negative impact on prognosis, stage T3 should potentially be considered a contraindication for OSC. Further evidence is required to confirm these assertions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05339-w
Juhana Rautiola, Alberto Martini, Laura S Mertens, Viktor Skokic, Luca Di Gianfrancesco, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Julia Heinzelbecker, Mikolaj Mendrek, Stephan Buse, Guillaume Ploussard, Hubert John, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Sebastian Edeling, Charles Van Praet, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Alexander Mottrie, Frederiek D'Hondt, Hendrik van der Poel, Camille Berquin, Karel Dacaestecker, Richard Gaston, Peter Wiklund, Abolfazl Hosseini
Purpose: To investigate functional, oncological and complication outcomes in women undergoing robot-assisted cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder.
Methods: From a multi-institutional database, we identified females with bladder cancer treated with RARC and intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder. We evaluated the continence rate, short-term oncological outcomes, and complication rates. Analyses were repeated and stratified by the status of preserving gynecological organs.
Results: The study involved 146 patients with the median age 60 years (IQR, 51-66 years). Pelvic organ-preserving procedure (POP) was performed in 77 patients (53%). Overall daytime and nighttime continence rates were 54% and 53%, respectively. For POP, the continence rate was 58% for both daytime and nighttime continence. In the non-POP cohort, the continence rate was 50% for daytime and 49% for nighttime continence. Both groups had balanced positive surgical margin rates (5,3% for POP and 4,7% for non-POP). In the whole cohort, high-grade (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) early and late complication rate was 7,5% and 7,5%, respectively.
Conclusions: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in females demonstrate excellent functional and complication outcomes. Pelvic organ-preserving cystectomy enhances urinary continence rates without adversely affecting surgical margins. Orthotopic neobladder in selected women with bladder cancer, along with pelvic organ-preserving cystectomy may be used for improved functional outcomes without compromising oncological results.
目的:研究接受机器人辅助膀胱切除术(RARC)和体外正位新膀胱术的女性患者的功能、肿瘤和并发症预后:我们从一个多机构数据库中筛选出了接受机器人辅助膀胱切除术(RARC)和体外正位新膀胱治疗的膀胱癌女性患者。我们评估了尿失禁率、短期肿瘤治疗效果和并发症发生率。我们根据保留妇科器官的情况进行了重复和分层分析:研究涉及 146 名患者,中位年龄为 60 岁(IQR,51-66 岁)。77名患者(53%)接受了盆腔器官保留手术(POP)。白天和夜间的总体尿失禁率分别为 54% 和 53%。就 POP 而言,日间和夜间尿失禁率均为 58%。在非 POP 患者组中,日间和夜间尿失禁率分别为 50%和 49%。两组患者的手术切缘阳性率相当(POP 为 5.3%,非 POP 为 4.7%)。在整个组别中,高级别(Clavien-Dindo ≥3)早期和晚期并发症的发生率分别为7.5%和7.5%:结论:女性机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与体腔内正位新膀胱术在功能和并发症方面都有很好的疗效。保留盆腔器官的膀胱切除术可提高尿失禁率,且不会对手术切缘造成不利影响。在保留盆腔器官的膀胱切除术的同时,对部分膀胱癌女性患者进行体外正位新膀胱治疗,可在不影响肿瘤治疗效果的前提下改善功能。
{"title":"Outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder in women.","authors":"Juhana Rautiola, Alberto Martini, Laura S Mertens, Viktor Skokic, Luca Di Gianfrancesco, Carlo Andrea Bravi, Julia Heinzelbecker, Mikolaj Mendrek, Stephan Buse, Guillaume Ploussard, Hubert John, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Sebastian Edeling, Charles Van Praet, Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, Alexander Mottrie, Frederiek D'Hondt, Hendrik van der Poel, Camille Berquin, Karel Dacaestecker, Richard Gaston, Peter Wiklund, Abolfazl Hosseini","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05339-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00345-024-05339-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate functional, oncological and complication outcomes in women undergoing robot-assisted cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a multi-institutional database, we identified females with bladder cancer treated with RARC and intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder. We evaluated the continence rate, short-term oncological outcomes, and complication rates. Analyses were repeated and stratified by the status of preserving gynecological organs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 146 patients with the median age 60 years (IQR, 51-66 years). Pelvic organ-preserving procedure (POP) was performed in 77 patients (53%). Overall daytime and nighttime continence rates were 54% and 53%, respectively. For POP, the continence rate was 58% for both daytime and nighttime continence. In the non-POP cohort, the continence rate was 50% for daytime and 49% for nighttime continence. Both groups had balanced positive surgical margin rates (5,3% for POP and 4,7% for non-POP). In the whole cohort, high-grade (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) early and late complication rate was 7,5% and 7,5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder in females demonstrate excellent functional and complication outcomes. Pelvic organ-preserving cystectomy enhances urinary continence rates without adversely affecting surgical margins. Orthotopic neobladder in selected women with bladder cancer, along with pelvic organ-preserving cystectomy may be used for improved functional outcomes without compromising oncological results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531442/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05323-4
Leonardo Cardili, Diogo Assed Bastos, Eder Nisi Ilario, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Giuliano Bettoni Guglielmetti, Maurício Cordeiro, José Pontes, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, William Carlos Nahas, Katia Ramos Moreira Leite
Purpose: High-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) commonly progresses to metastatic disease after local treatment. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) has recently been suggested to improve early oncological outcomes in HRLPC. We aimed to perform an exploratory analysis of the pathological outcomes from a prospective trial testing nADT before RP.
Methods: Prospective, single-centered, phase II, randomized trial performed between October 2018 and July 2021. Random assignment (1:1) for nADT modalities: goserelin (10.8 mg) plus abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/d) plus prednisone (5 mg/d), with or without apalutamide (240 mg/d) for 12 weeks, followed by RP (within 30 days) and extended lymph node dissection. Baseline clinical and pathological variables were assessed in needle biopsies before nADT. Tumor regression was histologically evaluated in surgical specimens using the residual cancer burden index (RCB).
Results: Sixty-two patients reached the surgical phase. Good response (RCB ≤ 0.25 cm³) was achieved in 14 patients (22.5%). Overall stage migration rate between baseline status (MRI before nADT) and final status (after surgery) was 27.4%. Late stage detection (high tumor burden, perineural invasion) and altered PTEN/ERG immunostatus showed significant association with poor response in univariate analysis. Higher baseline tumor burden was the only independent factor related to poor response in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: There are subgroups of patients, such as those with low baseline cancer burden and PTEN/ERG wild-type status, more likely to achieve good response with nADT. In the case of long term oncological benefit to be proven, nADT might be an additional therapeutic resource for these patients.
{"title":"Tumor regression after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in high risk prostate cancer: pathological outcomes from a randomized phase II trial.","authors":"Leonardo Cardili, Diogo Assed Bastos, Eder Nisi Ilario, Marina Alessandra Pereira, Giuliano Bettoni Guglielmetti, Maurício Cordeiro, José Pontes, Rafael Ferreira Coelho, William Carlos Nahas, Katia Ramos Moreira Leite","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05323-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05323-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) commonly progresses to metastatic disease after local treatment. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) has recently been suggested to improve early oncological outcomes in HRLPC. We aimed to perform an exploratory analysis of the pathological outcomes from a prospective trial testing nADT before RP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, single-centered, phase II, randomized trial performed between October 2018 and July 2021. Random assignment (1:1) for nADT modalities: goserelin (10.8 mg) plus abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/d) plus prednisone (5 mg/d), with or without apalutamide (240 mg/d) for 12 weeks, followed by RP (within 30 days) and extended lymph node dissection. Baseline clinical and pathological variables were assessed in needle biopsies before nADT. Tumor regression was histologically evaluated in surgical specimens using the residual cancer burden index (RCB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients reached the surgical phase. Good response (RCB ≤ 0.25 cm³) was achieved in 14 patients (22.5%). Overall stage migration rate between baseline status (MRI before nADT) and final status (after surgery) was 27.4%. Late stage detection (high tumor burden, perineural invasion) and altered PTEN/ERG immunostatus showed significant association with poor response in univariate analysis. Higher baseline tumor burden was the only independent factor related to poor response in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are subgroups of patients, such as those with low baseline cancer burden and PTEN/ERG wild-type status, more likely to achieve good response with nADT. In the case of long term oncological benefit to be proven, nADT might be an additional therapeutic resource for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-02DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05341-2
Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Florestan Koll, Cristina Cano Garcia, Carolin Siech, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Miriam Traumann, Luis Kluth, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel
Purpose: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients harbor reduced life expectancy after first-line treatment progression. Currently, no information is available regarding the influence of metastatic sites and osseous burden on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of mCRPC patients.
Methods: We relied on the Frankfurt Metastatic Cancer Database of the Prostate (FRAMCAP) database to select patients progressing to mCRPC and stratified them according to lymph node vs. osseous vs. visceral metastatic sites. Moreover, we stratified osseous mCRPC patients regarding the number of metastatic lesions. Endpoints were PFS and OS in uni- and multivariable Cox regression models.
Results: Of 363 patients, 9.4% harbored M1a vs. 78% M1b vs. 12% M1c mCRPC with significantly higher PSA in M1b (9 vs. 22 vs. 8ng/ml). Rates of DeNovo (15% vs. 60% vs. 56%) were significantly lower in the M1a mCRPC group, compared to M1b and M1c (p < 0.001). In PFS analyses, a median of 12.7 vs. 10.1 vs. 15.9 months for M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mCRPC was observed (p > 0.05). In multivariable Cox regression models, M1c mCRPC was independently at higher risk for progression (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.93, p = 0.048), relative to M1a. Regarding OS, significant differences were observed (p = 0.002), with median OS of 58 vs. 42 vs. 25 months for M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mCRPC and corresponding HRs of 1.54 (p = 0.11) and 2.76 (p < 0.01). In multivariable models M1c mCRPC was associated with higher risk of death (HR: 3.56, p = 0.049), relative to M1a. No differences were observed after stratification according to number of bone lesions (all p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusion: M1c mCRPC patients are independently at higher risk for progression and death, while M1a patients harbor best cancer-control outcomes.
目的:转移性抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者在一线治疗进展后预期寿命缩短。目前,还没有关于转移部位和骨性负担对mCRPC患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响的信息:我们依靠法兰克福前列腺癌转移数据库(FRAMCAP)筛选出进展为mCRPC的患者,并根据淋巴结转移部位、骨转移部位和内脏转移部位对他们进行了分层。此外,我们还根据转移病灶的数量对骨性 mCRPC 患者进行了分层。在单变量和多变量考克斯回归模型中,终点为PFS和OS:在363名患者中,9.4%患有M1a,78%患有M1b,12%患有M1c,其中M1b患者的PSA明显更高(9 vs. 22 vs. 8ng/ml)。与M1b和M1c相比,M1a mCRPC组的DeNovo率(15% vs. 60% vs. 56%)明显较低(P 0.05)。在多变量Cox回归模型中,相对于M1a,M1c mCRPC的进展风险更高(危险比[HR]:5.93,P = 0.048)。M1a与M1b与M1c mCRPC的中位OS分别为58个月与42个月与25个月,相应的HR分别为1.54(P = 0.11)和2.76(P 结论:M1a与M1b与M1c mCRPC的中位OS分别为58个月与42个月与25个月,相应的HR分别为1.54(P = 0.11)和2.76(P = 0.002):M1c型mCRPC患者的病情恶化和死亡风险较高,而M1a型患者的癌症控制效果最好。
{"title":"Influence of metastatic sites and burden on oncological outcomes in patients progressing to metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Clara Humke, Florestan Koll, Cristina Cano Garcia, Carolin Siech, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Miriam Traumann, Luis Kluth, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05341-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00345-024-05341-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients harbor reduced life expectancy after first-line treatment progression. Currently, no information is available regarding the influence of metastatic sites and osseous burden on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of mCRPC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We relied on the Frankfurt Metastatic Cancer Database of the Prostate (FRAMCAP) database to select patients progressing to mCRPC and stratified them according to lymph node vs. osseous vs. visceral metastatic sites. Moreover, we stratified osseous mCRPC patients regarding the number of metastatic lesions. Endpoints were PFS and OS in uni- and multivariable Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 363 patients, 9.4% harbored M1a vs. 78% M1b vs. 12% M1c mCRPC with significantly higher PSA in M1b (9 vs. 22 vs. 8ng/ml). Rates of DeNovo (15% vs. 60% vs. 56%) were significantly lower in the M1a mCRPC group, compared to M1b and M1c (p < 0.001). In PFS analyses, a median of 12.7 vs. 10.1 vs. 15.9 months for M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mCRPC was observed (p > 0.05). In multivariable Cox regression models, M1c mCRPC was independently at higher risk for progression (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.93, p = 0.048), relative to M1a. Regarding OS, significant differences were observed (p = 0.002), with median OS of 58 vs. 42 vs. 25 months for M1a vs. M1b vs. M1c mCRPC and corresponding HRs of 1.54 (p = 0.11) and 2.76 (p < 0.01). In multivariable models M1c mCRPC was associated with higher risk of death (HR: 3.56, p = 0.049), relative to M1a. No differences were observed after stratification according to number of bone lesions (all p ≥ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>M1c mCRPC patients are independently at higher risk for progression and death, while M1a patients harbor best cancer-control outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531415/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142565044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Exclusion criteria: concomitant ureteral stone, bilateral procedures. In case of symptomatic infection/asymptomatic bacteriuria, patients were given six days of antibiotics according to susceptibility profiles. All patients had antibiotics prophylaxis. Variables selected for the model: age, gender, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stone volume, indwelling preoperative bladder catheter, urine culture, single/multiple stones, indwelling preoperative stent/nephrostomy, ureteric access sheath, surgical time. Analysis was conducted using Python programming language, with Pandas library and machine learning models implemented using the Scikit-learn library. Machine learning algorithms tested: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting. Overall performance was accurately estimated by K-Fold cross-validation with three folds.
Results: 1552 patients were included. There were 20 (1.3%) sepsis cases, 16 (1.0%) septic shock cases, and three more cases (0.2%) of sepsis-related deaths. Random Forest model showed the best performance (precision = 1.00; recall = 0.86; F1 score = 0.92; accuracy = 0.92). A web-based interface of the predictive model was built and is available at https://emabal.pythonanywhere.com/ CONCLUSIONS: Our model can predict post-RIRS sepsis with high accuracy and might facilitate patient selection for day-surgery procedures and identify patients at higher risk of sepsis who deserve extreme attention for prompt identification and treatment.
{"title":"The infection post flexible UreteroreNoscopy (I-FUN) predictive model based on machine learning: a new clinical tool to assess the risk of sepsis post retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stone disease.","authors":"Daniele Castellani, Virgilio De Stefano, Carlo Brocca, Giorgio Mazzon, Antonio Celia, Andrea Bosio, Claudia Gozzo, Eugenio Alessandria, Luigi Cormio, Runeel Ratnayake, Andrea Vismara Fugini, Tonino Morena, Yiloren Tanidir, Tarik Emre Sener, Simon Choong, Stefania Ferretti, Andrea Pescuma, Salvatore Micali, Nicola Pavan, Alchiede Simonato, Roberto Miano, Luca Orecchia, Giacomo Maria Pirola, Angelo Naselli, Esteban Emiliani, Pedro Hernandez-Peñalver, Michele Di Dio, Claudio Bisegna, Davide Campobasso, Emanuele Serafin, Alessandro Antonelli, Emanuele Rubilotta, Deepak Ragoori, Emanuele Balloni, Marina Paolanti, Vineet Gauhar, Andrea Benedetto Galosi","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05314-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00345-024-05314-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To create a machine-learning model for estimating the likelihood of post-retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients with kidney stone(s) only undergoing RIRS in 16 centers were prospectively included (January 2022-August 2023).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>adult, renal stone(s) only, CT scan (within three months), mid-stream urine culture (within 10 days).</p><p><strong>Exclusion criteria: </strong>concomitant ureteral stone, bilateral procedures. In case of symptomatic infection/asymptomatic bacteriuria, patients were given six days of antibiotics according to susceptibility profiles. All patients had antibiotics prophylaxis. Variables selected for the model: age, gender, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, stone volume, indwelling preoperative bladder catheter, urine culture, single/multiple stones, indwelling preoperative stent/nephrostomy, ureteric access sheath, surgical time. Analysis was conducted using Python programming language, with Pandas library and machine learning models implemented using the Scikit-learn library. Machine learning algorithms tested: Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting. Overall performance was accurately estimated by K-Fold cross-validation with three folds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1552 patients were included. There were 20 (1.3%) sepsis cases, 16 (1.0%) septic shock cases, and three more cases (0.2%) of sepsis-related deaths. Random Forest model showed the best performance (precision = 1.00; recall = 0.86; F1 score = 0.92; accuracy = 0.92). A web-based interface of the predictive model was built and is available at https://emabal.pythonanywhere.com/ CONCLUSIONS: Our model can predict post-RIRS sepsis with high accuracy and might facilitate patient selection for day-surgery procedures and identify patients at higher risk of sepsis who deserve extreme attention for prompt identification and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05343-0
Zhiyu Qian, Dejan Filipas, Edoardo Beatrici, Jamie Ye, Mansoo Cho, Filippo Dagnino, Hanna Zurl, Daniel Stelzl, David F Friedlander, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Stuart R Lipsitz, Alexander P Cole, Lori B Lerner
Introduction: Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is one of the most common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Some institutions routinely perform BPO surgeries in ambulatory setting, while others elect for overnight hospitalization. With the COVID-19 pandemic limiting resources and hospital space for elective surgery, we investigated the time trend of ambulatory BPO procedures performed around the COVID-19 outbreak.
Methods: We identified BPO surgeries from the California State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases between 2018 and 2020. Our primary outcome was the proportion of procedures performed in ambulatory settings with a length of stay of zero days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with ambulatory surgery around the COVID-19 outbreak. Spline regression with a knot at the pandemic outbreak was performed to compare time trends pre- and post-pandemic.
Results: Among 37,148 patients who underwent BPO procedures, 30,067 (80.9%) were ambulatory. Before COVID-19, 80.1% BPO procedures were performed ambulatory, which increased to 83.4% after COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0.001). In multivariable model, BPO procedures performed after COVID-19 outbreak were 1.26 times more likely to be ambulatory (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40, p < 0.0001). Spline curve analysis indicated significantly different trend of change pre- and post-pandemic (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: We observed a rising trend of BPO surgeries performed in ambulatory setting post-pandemic. It remains to be seen if the observed ambulatory transition remains as we continue to recover from the pandemic.
{"title":"Trend of ambulatory benign prostatic obstruction surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Zhiyu Qian, Dejan Filipas, Edoardo Beatrici, Jamie Ye, Mansoo Cho, Filippo Dagnino, Hanna Zurl, Daniel Stelzl, David F Friedlander, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Stuart R Lipsitz, Alexander P Cole, Lori B Lerner","doi":"10.1007/s00345-024-05343-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05343-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is one of the most common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Some institutions routinely perform BPO surgeries in ambulatory setting, while others elect for overnight hospitalization. With the COVID-19 pandemic limiting resources and hospital space for elective surgery, we investigated the time trend of ambulatory BPO procedures performed around the COVID-19 outbreak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified BPO surgeries from the California State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases between 2018 and 2020. Our primary outcome was the proportion of procedures performed in ambulatory settings with a length of stay of zero days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with ambulatory surgery around the COVID-19 outbreak. Spline regression with a knot at the pandemic outbreak was performed to compare time trends pre- and post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 37,148 patients who underwent BPO procedures, 30,067 (80.9%) were ambulatory. Before COVID-19, 80.1% BPO procedures were performed ambulatory, which increased to 83.4% after COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0.001). In multivariable model, BPO procedures performed after COVID-19 outbreak were 1.26 times more likely to be ambulatory (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40, p < 0.0001). Spline curve analysis indicated significantly different trend of change pre- and post-pandemic (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed a rising trend of BPO surgeries performed in ambulatory setting post-pandemic. It remains to be seen if the observed ambulatory transition remains as we continue to recover from the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"42 1","pages":"613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142562880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}