Objective: To study the impact of simvastatin on α-subunit epithelial sodium channel (α-ENaC) mRNA expression in primary culture alveolar typeII (ATII) epithelial cell of rats induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro.
Methods: ATII of primary generation were isolated from adult Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. The cells were randomly divided into five groups: blank control group, LPS injured group (final concentration of LPS 1 mg/L), simvastatin low and high concentration groups (final concentration of simvastatin 20 μmol/L, 30 μmol/L, respectively), solution control group. Then, after being intervened for 1, 12 and 24 hours, the level of human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) were monitored by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and α-ENaC mRNA expression was tested by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Results: After being intervened for 1, 12 and 24 hours, expressions of TNF-α and IL-1β in LPS injured group were obviously higher than those in blank control group. Expressions of TNF-α and IL-1β at 1, 12 and 24 hours in simvastatin low concentration group were significantly decreased compared with those in LPS injured group (TNF-α 1 hour: 1178.80±127.43 ng/L vs. 2336.00±170.04 ng/L, 12 hours: 1003.60±59.61 ng/L vs. 2479.80±210.41 ng/L, 24 hours: 695.80±25.24 ng/L vs. 1167.60±132.72 ng/L; IL-β 1 hour: 285.00±42.60 ng/L vs. 429.60±27.39 ng/L, 12 hours: 238.60±24.12 ng/L vs. 822.20±12.74 ng/L, 24 hours: 213.40±17.87 ng/L vs. 637.60±22.96 ng/L, all P<0.05). Expressions of TNF-α and IL-1β in high concentration group were decreased more obviously than those in low concentration group (TNF-α 1 hour: 965.60±24.45 ng/L vs. 1178.80±127.43 ng/L, 12 hours: 522.80±16.89 ng/L vs. 1003.60±59.61 ng/L, 24 hours: 252.40±17.64 ng/L vs. 695.80±25.24 ng/L; IL-1β 1 hour: 225.60±34.44 ng/L vs. 285.00±42.60 ng/L, 12 hours: 190.60±17.64 ng/L vs. 238.60±24.12 ng/L, 24 hours: 152.80±14.70 ng/L vs. 213.40±17.87 ng/L, all P<0.05), but increased compared with those in blank control group. After being intervened for 1 hour, no evident changes were observed in expression of α-ENaC mRNA in all groups. After being intervened for 12 hours and 24 hours, evident decrease in expression of α-ENaC mRNA (A value) was observed in LPS injured group compared with blank control group (12 hours: 0.211±0.021 vs. 0.496±0.027, 24 hours: 0.253±0.030 vs. 0.482±0.030, both P<0.05). Expressions of α-ENaC mRNA in simvastatin low concentration group evidently increased compared with those in LPS injured group (12 hours: 0.363±0.030 vs. 0.211±0.021, 24 hours: 0.309±0.024 vs. 0.253±0.030, both P<0.05). Expressions of α-ENaC mRNA in simvastatin high concentration group increased more obviously compared with those in low concentration group (12 hours: 0.413±0.034 vs. 0.363±0.030, 24 hours: 0.346±0.024 vs. 0.309±0.024, both P<0.05), but decreased compared with blank contr
Objective: To investigate an effective and safe protocol for enteral nutrition (EN) patients permitting successfully transmit insulin administration from venous pump-in to subcutaneous injection.
Methods: A prospective randomized control study was conducted. Critical patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Tongren Hospital from September 2008 to February 2009 were randomly divided into two groups when the energy provided by EN up to half of the total energy requirement. Experiment group (n=44): the protocol was applied for insulin glargine and regular insulin injection; control group (n=43): protocol was applied for subcutaneous regular insulin injection. Target glucose range was 4.4-7.8 mmol/L (80-140 mg/dl). If blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L was maintained twicely, the approach of insulin administration would convert from subcutaneous injection to venous pump-in using the computerized glucose control protocol. If the infusion rate of insulin was less than 3 U/h and lasted more than 6 hours, blood glucose ≤7.8 mmol/L, insulin administration was switched to subcutaneous injection again. The general information and all glucose regulation data were recorded for analysis.
Results: The two groups did not differ at baseline for the general information, mean blood glucose and the glucose variation. A total of 1689 blood glucose records were analyzed. The mean blood glucose in experiment group, and was significantly lower than that in control group(7.58±1.17 mmol/L vs. 9.40±1.74 mmol/L, P<0.05). The rate of glucose values within target range in experiment group was significantly higher than that in control group [49.72% (534/1074) vs. 35.61% (219/615), P<0.01]. The glucose standard deviation (SD) in experiment group was significantly lower than that in control group (1.89±0.52 mmol/L vs. 2.17±0.94 mmol/L, P<0.05). The number of measurements needed per patient per day was significantly reduced in experiment group compared with control group (7.51±1.31 vs. 8.15±0.97, P<0.05). The ratio of patients converted to venous pump-in was significantly decreased in experiment group compared with control group (9.09% vs. 44.19%, P<0.01). Hypoglycemia (≤3.3 mmol/L) did not different between experiment group and control group [0.74% (8/1074) vs. 0.49% (3/615), P=0.75].
Conclusions: Compared with the conventional subcutaneous insulin injection protocol, this protocol with insulin glargine combined regular insulin subcutaneous injection can control the glucose level effectively during EN in critical patients. The glucose variation and the numbers of measurements were significantly reduced by this protocol. It is helpful for the insulin transmission from venous pump-in to subcutaneous injection.