The purpose of this study is to reduce the gap between the requirement analysis and analysis phases of developing multi-agent systems. We utilize KAOS, one of the goal-oriented analysis methodologies, as a requirement analysis method, and propose a model translation into an analysis model for simple and effective development of multi-agent systems.
{"title":"Analysis of multi-agent systems based on KAOS modeling","authors":"Hiroyuki Nakagawa, Takuya Karube, S. Honiden","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134454","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134454","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to reduce the gap between the requirement analysis and analysis phases of developing multi-agent systems. We utilize KAOS, one of the goal-oriented analysis methodologies, as a requirement analysis method, and propose a model translation into an analysis model for simple and effective development of multi-agent systems.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130548879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
During the last decade there has been a dramatic increase in the number of paradigms, standards and tools that can be used to realize process-oriented information systems. A major problem neglected in software engineering research so far has been the systematic determination of costs, benefits, and risks that are related to the use of these process-oriented software engineering methods and technologies. This task is quite difficult as the added value is influenced by many drivers. This paper sketches an economic-driven evaluation methodology to analyze costs, benefits, and risks of process-oriented software technologies and corresponding projects. We introduce an evaluation meta model and sketch a formalism to describe economic-driven evaluation scenarios.
{"title":"Designing an economic-driven evaluation framework for process-oriented software technologies","authors":"Bela Mutschler, J. Bumiller, M. Reichert","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134442","url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade there has been a dramatic increase in the number of paradigms, standards and tools that can be used to realize process-oriented information systems. A major problem neglected in software engineering research so far has been the systematic determination of costs, benefits, and risks that are related to the use of these process-oriented software engineering methods and technologies. This task is quite difficult as the added value is influenced by many drivers. This paper sketches an economic-driven evaluation methodology to analyze costs, benefits, and risks of process-oriented software technologies and corresponding projects. We introduce an evaluation meta model and sketch a formalism to describe economic-driven evaluation scenarios.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130606100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper describes an initial investigation of how different conditions for conducting a team programming exercise impact learning. We conducted a series of in-depth case studies on the use of various communication technologies and compared them with face-to-face case studies of team programming. We explored how these communication technologies can help improve students' learning. We summarize the findings from these studies and give guidance to instructors and to tool designers on how future tools can be improved to support collaborative learning in team programming.
{"title":"A comparison of communication technologies to support novice team programming","authors":"Davor Cubranic, M. Storey, Jody Ryall","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134394","url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an initial investigation of how different conditions for conducting a team programming exercise impact learning. We conducted a series of in-depth case studies on the use of various communication technologies and compared them with face-to-face case studies of team programming. We explored how these communication technologies can help improve students' learning. We summarize the findings from these studies and give guidance to instructors and to tool designers on how future tools can be improved to support collaborative learning in team programming.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126263713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ita Richardson, A. Milewski, N. Mullick, Patrick Keil
The Global Studio Project integrated the work of Software Engineering students spread across four countries into a single project and represented, for most of the students, their first major "real-world" development experience. Interviews indicated that the major areas of learning were informal skills that included learning to establish and work effectively within a team, learning how to react quickly to frequent changes in requirements, architecture and organization, and learning to manage and optimize communications. Since all these skills require rapid reaction to unpredictable factors, we view them as improvisation and discuss the role of experiential education in facilitating improvisation.
{"title":"Distributed development: an education perspective on the global studio project","authors":"Ita Richardson, A. Milewski, N. Mullick, Patrick Keil","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134390","url":null,"abstract":"The Global Studio Project integrated the work of Software Engineering students spread across four countries into a single project and represented, for most of the students, their first major \"real-world\" development experience. Interviews indicated that the major areas of learning were informal skills that included learning to establish and work effectively within a team, learning how to react quickly to frequent changes in requirements, architecture and organization, and learning to manage and optimize communications. Since all these skills require rapid reaction to unpredictable factors, we view them as improvisation and discuss the role of experiential education in facilitating improvisation.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"9 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113961838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Usability is increasingly recognized as a quality attribute that one has to explicitly deal with during development. Nevertheless, usability techniques, when applied, are decoupled from the software development process. The host of techniques offered by the HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) field make the task of selecting the most appropriate ones for a given project and organization a difficult task. Project managers and developers aiming to integrate usability practices into their software process have to face important challenges, as the techniques are not described in the frame of a software process as it is understood in SE (Software Engineering). Even when HCI experts (either in-house or from an external organization) are involved in the integration process, it is also a tough endeavour due to the strong differences in terminology and overall approach to software development between HCI and SE. In this tutorial we will present, from a SE viewpoint, which usability techniques can be most valuable to development teams with little or no previous usability experience, how a particular set of techniques can be selected according to the specific characteristics of the organization and project, and how usability techniques match with the activity groups in the development process.
{"title":"How to integrate usability into the software development process","authors":"Natalia Juristo Juzgado, X. Ferré","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134515","url":null,"abstract":"Usability is increasingly recognized as a quality attribute that one has to explicitly deal with during development. Nevertheless, usability techniques, when applied, are decoupled from the software development process. The host of techniques offered by the HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) field make the task of selecting the most appropriate ones for a given project and organization a difficult task. Project managers and developers aiming to integrate usability practices into their software process have to face important challenges, as the techniques are not described in the frame of a software process as it is understood in SE (Software Engineering). Even when HCI experts (either in-house or from an external organization) are involved in the integration process, it is also a tough endeavour due to the strong differences in terminology and overall approach to software development between HCI and SE. In this tutorial we will present, from a SE viewpoint, which usability techniques can be most valuable to development teams with little or no previous usability experience, how a particular set of techniques can be selected according to the specific characteristics of the organization and project, and how usability techniques match with the activity groups in the development process.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122570859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper we describe our experiences of introducing agile practices into undergraduate group work by comparing the results to more traditional plan-driven groups. When considering whether to adopt an agile or plan-driven project management strategy in a commercial context, Return On Investment (ROI) is an important factor. We have adapted the ROI model to our analysis to assess what affect a chosen development approach has on the outcome of the groups' projects. In our investigation we observed seven software teams as they implemented a business information system. Two groups adopted agile practices, including fortnightly iterative delivery; the other groups were controls. We found that being labelled agile did not necessarily imply that a group's practices were more agile. Also, it was unclear whether the so-called agile groups delivered a better ROI than their plan-driven counterparts.
{"title":"Using return on investment to compare agile and plan-driven practices in undergraduate group projects","authors":"P. Rundle, R. Dewar","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134383","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134383","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe our experiences of introducing agile practices into undergraduate group work by comparing the results to more traditional plan-driven groups. When considering whether to adopt an agile or plan-driven project management strategy in a commercial context, Return On Investment (ROI) is an important factor. We have adapted the ROI model to our analysis to assess what affect a chosen development approach has on the outcome of the groups' projects. In our investigation we observed seven software teams as they implemented a business information system. Two groups adopted agile practices, including fortnightly iterative delivery; the other groups were controls. We found that being labelled agile did not necessarily imply that a group's practices were more agile. Also, it was unclear whether the so-called agile groups delivered a better ROI than their plan-driven counterparts.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121500415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Session details: Keynote talks","authors":"","doi":"10.1145/3245446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3245446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122944289","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Session details: Doctoral symposium: presentations","authors":"A. Finkelstein, B. Nuseibeh","doi":"10.1145/3245455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3245455","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129368028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Component based software development (CBSD) becomes a popular paradigm for Internet based systems. Compared to other popular paradigms, CBSD supports the development from reusable components other than the development from the scratch. Consequently, modeling becomes more important than programming and the modeling techniques in traditional paradigms have to be changed more or less. Particularly, improper selection and misuse of modeling techniques would prevent the target system from benefiting from CBSD and even make the project fail. For helping researchers and practitioners to equip with CBSD, this tutorial will provide basic knowledge and skill of modeling component based systems systematically. Firstly, we will introduce the technical and non-technical motivations of CBSD with emphasis on software reuse which puts a significant impact on modeling. Secondly, we will present a systematic approach to modeling component based systems with a set of existing well-proved modeling techniques, including feature modeling for requirements specification, architecture modeling for abstract design, and object oriented modeling for detailed design. These modeling techniques and a real-life project will be discussed in details in the rest of the tutorial.
{"title":"Modeling of component based systems","authors":"W. Shao, Gang Huang, Haiyan Zhao","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134514","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134514","url":null,"abstract":"Component based software development (CBSD) becomes a popular paradigm for Internet based systems. Compared to other popular paradigms, CBSD supports the development from reusable components other than the development from the scratch. Consequently, modeling becomes more important than programming and the modeling techniques in traditional paradigms have to be changed more or less. Particularly, improper selection and misuse of modeling techniques would prevent the target system from benefiting from CBSD and even make the project fail. For helping researchers and practitioners to equip with CBSD, this tutorial will provide basic knowledge and skill of modeling component based systems systematically. Firstly, we will introduce the technical and non-technical motivations of CBSD with emphasis on software reuse which puts a significant impact on modeling. Secondly, we will present a systematic approach to modeling component based systems with a set of existing well-proved modeling techniques, including feature modeling for requirements specification, architecture modeling for abstract design, and object oriented modeling for detailed design. These modeling techniques and a real-life project will be discussed in details in the rest of the tutorial.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"77 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115666471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Software testability analysis has been an important research direction since 1990s and becomes more pervasive when entering 21st century. In this paper, we summarize problems in existing research work. We propose to use beta distribution to indicate software testability. When incorporating testing effectiveness information, we theoretically prove that the distribution can express testing effort and test value at the same time. We conduct experiment and validate our results on Siemens programs. Future work concentrate on deducing a prior estimation of the distribution for given software and testing criterion pair from program slicing and semantic analysis.
{"title":"A new approach for software testability analysis","authors":"Liang Zhao","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134469","url":null,"abstract":"Software testability analysis has been an important research direction since 1990s and becomes more pervasive when entering 21st century. In this paper, we summarize problems in existing research work. We propose to use beta distribution to indicate software testability. When incorporating testing effectiveness information, we theoretically prove that the distribution can express testing effort and test value at the same time. We conduct experiment and validate our results on Siemens programs. Future work concentrate on deducing a prior estimation of the distribution for given software and testing criterion pair from program slicing and semantic analysis.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127787849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：