首页 > 最新文献

Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure最新文献

英文 中文
Inadmissibility of Summary Hearing of Administrative Offense Cases by Commercial Courts 商事法院行政违法案件简易审理的可采性
Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26
N. A. Morozova
The author of the article argues that cases of administrative offenses in arbitration courts should not be considered in simplified procedure, since this contradicts the essence of administrative responsibility.
本文的作者认为,仲裁法院的行政违法案件不应简化程序,因为这与行政责任的本质相矛盾。
{"title":"Inadmissibility of Summary Hearing of Administrative Offense Cases by Commercial Courts","authors":"N. A. Morozova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-23-26","url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article argues that cases of administrative offenses in arbitration courts should not be considered in simplified procedure, since this contradicts the essence of administrative responsibility.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128020002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Asynchronous” Judicial Procedures as a Future Model of International Arbitration “非同步”司法程序作为国际仲裁的未来模式
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-58-60
A. Selkova
The author examines how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted international arbitration in terms of the use of new forms of litigation. The article summarizes that parties, lawyers and arbitrators must adapt to the new reality of court hearings caused by travel restrictions and social distancing measures. Attention is drawn to one particularly topical issue: should we completely stop holding hearings directly in the courtroom and switch to a new model of sessions organized remotely through using of modern video conferencing technologies? In addition, this author attempts to develop an analytical framework for remote hearings in international arbitration. In the context of the current pandemic and its possible continuation, the author proposes certain criteria for determining the need for a remote hearing.
作者探讨了COVID-19大流行如何从使用新诉讼形式的角度影响国际仲裁。文章总结说,当事人、律师和仲裁员必须适应旅行限制和社会距离措施带来的法庭听证的新现实。人们的注意力被吸引到一个特别热门的问题上:我们是否应该完全停止直接在法庭上举行听证会,转而采用一种通过使用现代视频会议技术远程组织会议的新模式?此外,本文作者试图为国际仲裁中的远程听证建立一个分析框架。在当前大流行及其可能持续的情况下,提交人提出了确定是否需要远程听证的某些标准。
{"title":"“Asynchronous” Judicial Procedures as a Future Model of International Arbitration","authors":"A. Selkova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-58-60","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-58-60","url":null,"abstract":"The author examines how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted international arbitration in terms of the use of new forms of litigation. The article summarizes that parties, lawyers and arbitrators must adapt to the new reality of court hearings caused by travel restrictions and social distancing measures. Attention is drawn to one particularly topical issue: should we completely stop holding hearings directly in the courtroom and switch to a new model of sessions organized remotely through using of modern video conferencing technologies? In addition, this author attempts to develop an analytical framework for remote hearings in international arbitration. In the context of the current pandemic and its possible continuation, the author proposes certain criteria for determining the need for a remote hearing.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129360442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relevant Issues of the Development of the Principle of Good Faith in an Arbitration and Civil Procedure 诚信原则在仲裁和民事诉讼中发展的相关问题
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-3-7
I. G. Fedin
The article deals with topical issues related to the development of the principle of good faith in domestic civil and arbitration law. The author describes the current state of this principle in these sectors, discloses the concept of «good faith» and proposes legislative initiatives to develop the regulator in the judicial process and thereby strengthen the procedural culture.
本文论述了诚信原则在国内民法和仲裁法中发展的相关问题。作者描述了这一原则在这些部门的现状,揭示了“诚信”的概念,并提出了立法倡议,以发展司法程序中的监管机构,从而加强程序文化。
{"title":"Relevant Issues of the Development of the Principle of Good Faith in an Arbitration and Civil Procedure","authors":"I. G. Fedin","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-3-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-3-7","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with topical issues related to the development of the principle of good faith in domestic civil and arbitration law. The author describes the current state of this principle in these sectors, discloses the concept of «good faith» and proposes legislative initiatives to develop the regulator in the judicial process and thereby strengthen the procedural culture.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116450266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the Legal Nature of a Set-off 论抵销的法律性质
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-35-39
I. Shevchenko
The author, discussing on the moment when obligations terminate by means of judicial set-off, concludes, that the answer to this question is concealed in the concept of a court decision. The solutions to the put up question depending on application of declaration theory or order theory are analyzed.
笔者在讨论司法抵销义务终止的时刻时得出结论,这个问题的答案隐藏在法院判决的概念中。分析了应用声明理论或顺序理论解决上述问题的方法。
{"title":"On the Legal Nature of a Set-off","authors":"I. Shevchenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-35-39","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-35-39","url":null,"abstract":"The author, discussing on the moment when obligations terminate by means of judicial set-off, concludes, that the answer to this question is concealed in the concept of a court decision. The solutions to the put up question depending on application of declaration theory or order theory are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115171619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Main Problems of the Development of the Institution of Conciliation in a Civil Procedure 论我国民事诉讼调解制度发展的主要问题
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-40-43
Larisa V. Potapova
The article deals with current problems of development of the Institute of conciliation procedures in civil proceedings. The author analyzes the point of view of scientists about the concept of “conciliation procedures”, on the basis of which he identifies a number of characteristic features. The study of the legal framework on this issue allows us to systematize the key types of conciliation procedures in civil proceedings-negotiations, mediation, judicial reconciliation. Despite the fact that these procedures are reflected in the law, they are rarely used in practice, which is due to some problems, in particular, the low level of legal literacy of the population; the lack of well-developed information work with citizens; people’s distrust of the new legal institution; the rather high cost of services provided by mediators, etc. All this requires prompt resolution, which will reduce the burden on the judicial authorities and improve the quality of the process.
本文论述了民事诉讼调解程序研究所目前发展中存在的问题。作者分析了科学家对“调解程序”概念的看法,并在此基础上确定了若干特征。对这一问题的法律框架的研究使我们能够将民事诉讼中主要类型的调解程序——谈判、调解、司法和解——系统化。尽管这些程序反映在法律中,但在实践中很少使用,这是由于一些问题,特别是人口的法律知识水平较低;缺乏完善的公民信息工作;民众对新法律制度的不信任;调解员等提供的服务费用相当高。所有这些都需要迅速解决,这将减轻司法当局的负担并提高程序的质量。
{"title":"The Main Problems of the Development of the Institution of Conciliation in a Civil Procedure","authors":"Larisa V. Potapova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-40-43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-40-43","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with current problems of development of the Institute of conciliation procedures in civil proceedings. The author analyzes the point of view of scientists about the concept of “conciliation procedures”, on the basis of which he identifies a number of characteristic features. The study of the legal framework on this issue allows us to systematize the key types of conciliation procedures in civil proceedings-negotiations, mediation, judicial reconciliation. Despite the fact that these procedures are reflected in the law, they are rarely used in practice, which is due to some problems, in particular, the low level of legal literacy of the population; the lack of well-developed information work with citizens; people’s distrust of the new legal institution; the rather high cost of services provided by mediators, etc. All this requires prompt resolution, which will reduce the burden on the judicial authorities and improve the quality of the process.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124592440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The English Model of Enforcement Proceedings 英国强制执行程序模式
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-53-57
D. Olenin
The article is devoted to the enforcement proceedings in England. The author examines the specific characters of the system of compulsory execution of judicial acts in civil cases in England, together with the measures of compulsory execution provided by the English procedural legislation and the procedure for their application. Analyzing foreign legislation, the author concludes that in England there is a mixed decentralized judicial enforcement system. Also, the author identifies a big importance of the recoverer in enforcement proceedings in England. Consequently, the role of the enforcement agent in England is reduced to the implementation of the recoverer’s will by order of the court.
这篇文章专门讨论英国的强制执行程序。本文考察了英国民事司法行为强制执行制度的特点,以及英国诉讼立法规定的强制执行措施及其适用程序。通过对国外立法的分析,笔者认为英国是一种混合型的分权司法执行制度。此外,作者还指出了英国强制执行程序中追讨人的重要性。因此,在英国,执行代理人的作用被简化为通过法院的命令执行恢复者的遗嘱。
{"title":"The English Model of Enforcement Proceedings","authors":"D. Olenin","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-53-57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-53-57","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the enforcement proceedings in England. The author examines the specific characters of the system of compulsory execution of judicial acts in civil cases in England, together with the measures of compulsory execution provided by the English procedural legislation and the procedure for their application. Analyzing foreign legislation, the author concludes that in England there is a mixed decentralized judicial enforcement system. Also, the author identifies a big importance of the recoverer in enforcement proceedings in England. Consequently, the role of the enforcement agent in England is reduced to the implementation of the recoverer’s will by order of the court.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116880962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Professional Representation as Restriction of the Right of a Legal Entity (Corporation) to Judicial Protection 专业代理对法人(公司)司法保护权的制约
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-18-22
S. Kazakova, Olesya A. Kukhareva, A. N. Yusupova
The relevance of the work is due to the need to analyze and comprehend the institution of professional judicial representation in the light of the implementation of the right of legal entities to judicial protection. The results of the work are presented in the form of theses on the restriction by the current arbitration procedural legislation of the corporation’s right to participate in court cases in the aspect of the principles of civil procedural law. The authors come to the conclusion about the need for more flexible legal regulation of the institution of judicial representation in order to ensure guarantees of access of legal entities to justice.
这项工作的相关性是由于需要从法律实体司法保护权的实施角度来分析和理解专业司法代理制度。本文的研究成果以论文的形式从民事诉讼法原则的角度阐述了现行仲裁程序立法对公司诉讼参与权的限制。作者得出的结论是,需要对司法代理制度进行更灵活的法律规制,以确保法律实体诉诸司法的保障。
{"title":"Professional Representation as Restriction of the Right of a Legal Entity (Corporation) to Judicial Protection","authors":"S. Kazakova, Olesya A. Kukhareva, A. N. Yusupova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-18-22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-18-22","url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the work is due to the need to analyze and comprehend the institution of professional judicial representation in the light of the implementation of the right of legal entities to judicial protection. The results of the work are presented in the form of theses on the restriction by the current arbitration procedural legislation of the corporation’s right to participate in court cases in the aspect of the principles of civil procedural law. The authors come to the conclusion about the need for more flexible legal regulation of the institution of judicial representation in order to ensure guarantees of access of legal entities to justice.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133574005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences between Civil Procedural Succession and Civil Succession 民事程序继承与民事继承的区别
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-49-52
O. Derbisheva
The article examines the essence of civil procedural succession. The differences between civil procedural succession and civil succession are formulated.
本文考察了民事诉讼继承的本质。阐述了民事程序继承与民事继承的区别。
{"title":"Differences between Civil Procedural Succession and Civil Succession","authors":"O. Derbisheva","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-49-52","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-49-52","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the essence of civil procedural succession. The differences between civil procedural succession and civil succession are formulated.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128090821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms 违反法证检验条款被法庭罚款
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29
Lyudmila K. Bondarenko
The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.
调查了因违反提供考试结果的条款(APC RF第55条)而被法院罚款的问题。认为损害的性质与物质责任和法律责任的程度不相适应。事实证明,法院罚款的任命具有压制性。建议在符合仲裁程序原则的前提下,通过明确立法技术,使侵权行为与处罚金额同步。
{"title":"Court Fine for Violation of Forensic Examination Terms","authors":"Lyudmila K. Bondarenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-23-29","url":null,"abstract":"The problem of the appointment of a court fine for violation of the terms for the provision of the results of the examination (Article 55 of the APC RF) is investigated. It is argued that the nature of the harm does not correspond to the extent of the material and legal responsibility. It is proved that the appointment of a court fine is repressive in nature. It is proposed to synchronize the tort and the amount of the sanction, in accordance with the principles of arbitration proceedings, by clarifying the legislative technique.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116073121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Summary Proceedings in an Arbitration Procedure: Corporate and Legal Aspects 仲裁程序中的简易程序:公司和法律方面
Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI: 10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-30-34
E. Makeeva
The article discusses certain issues of the institution of simplified proceedings in the arbitration process, analyzes the reasons for the establishment by arbitration procedural legislation of a ban on the consideration of corporate disputes in a simplified manner, compares the features of disputes subject to consideration in a simplified manner and corporate disputes.
本文探讨了仲裁程序中简化程序制度的若干问题,分析了仲裁程序立法禁止公司纠纷简化审议的原因,比较了公司纠纷简化审议的特点。
{"title":"Summary Proceedings in an Arbitration Procedure: Corporate and Legal Aspects","authors":"E. Makeeva","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-30-34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-3-30-34","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses certain issues of the institution of simplified proceedings in the arbitration process, analyzes the reasons for the establishment by arbitration procedural legislation of a ban on the consideration of corporate disputes in a simplified manner, compares the features of disputes subject to consideration in a simplified manner and corporate disputes.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126272020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1