Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.020
N. Pettorelli, P. Brotherton, Z. Davies, Nancy Ockenden, W. Sutherland, J. Vickery
In the Anthropocene, when our environment is changing rapidly and the windows of opportunity for action to prevent further biodiversity loss are narrow, conservation researchers are increasingly encouraged to think and operate beyond the traditional approaches of producing peer-reviewed papers and presenting results to other members of the research community. Indeed, the perception that researchers belong in their ivory tower, from which they deliver evidence for others to interpret, disseminate and use in decision-making, is thankfully now widely recognised as outdated. The rise of fake news, a deliberate lack of consideration for scientific evidence, and changes to the ways of assessing the value of researchers’ work probably all play a role in supporting this shift in perception. Moreover, for many researchers, the prospect of their work ‘making a difference’ and having an impact on wider society is at least as great a motivation for doing research as generating new knowledge, however interesting that may be.
{"title":"Successfully translating conservation research into practice and policy: concluding thoughts","authors":"N. Pettorelli, P. Brotherton, Z. Davies, Nancy Ockenden, W. Sutherland, J. Vickery","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.020","url":null,"abstract":"In the Anthropocene, when our environment is changing rapidly and the windows of opportunity for action to prevent further biodiversity loss are narrow, conservation researchers are increasingly encouraged to think and operate beyond the traditional approaches of producing peer-reviewed papers and presenting results to other members of the research community. Indeed, the perception that researchers belong in their ivory tower, from which they deliver evidence for others to interpret, disseminate and use in decision-making, is thankfully now widely recognised as outdated. The rise of fake news, a deliberate lack of consideration for scientific evidence, and changes to the ways of assessing the value of researchers’ work probably all play a role in supporting this shift in perception. Moreover, for many researchers, the prospect of their work ‘making a difference’ and having an impact on wider society is at least as great a motivation for doing research as generating new knowledge, however interesting that may be.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126978334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.001
W. Sutherland, P. Brotherton, Nancy Ockenden, N. Pettorelli, J. Vickery, Z. Davies
amie Gundry’s dramatic image of a white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) on the cover of this book reflects the twisting changes in fortune experienced by this species, with a revival that can be attributed to a successful interplay of science, policy and practice. White-tailed eagles were historically much more widely distributed than they are today (Yalden, 2007), once breeding across much of Europe, but by the early twentieth century the species was extinct across much of western and southern Europe. The main cause of its decline was persecution by farmers and shepherds, who considered the eagles a threat to their livestock, but, along with other raptors, white-tailed eagles were also seriously affected by DDT in the 1960s and 1970s, which had disastrous effects on the breeding success of remaining populations.
{"title":"Making a difference in conservation: linking science and policy","authors":"W. Sutherland, P. Brotherton, Nancy Ockenden, N. Pettorelli, J. Vickery, Z. Davies","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.001","url":null,"abstract":"amie Gundry’s dramatic image of a white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) on the cover of this book reflects the twisting changes in fortune experienced by this species, with a revival that can be attributed to a successful interplay of science, policy and practice. White-tailed eagles were historically much more widely distributed than they are today (Yalden, 2007), once breeding across much of Europe, but by the early twentieth century the species was extinct across much of western and southern Europe. The main cause of its decline was persecution by farmers and shepherds, who considered the eagles a threat to their livestock, but, along with other raptors, white-tailed eagles were also seriously affected by DDT in the 1960s and 1970s, which had disastrous effects on the breeding success of remaining populations.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114276854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.009
M. Ausden, J. Walsh
9.
9.
{"title":"The use of evidence in decision-making by practitioners","authors":"M. Ausden, J. Walsh","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.009","url":null,"abstract":"9.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126668217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.016
E. Lester, Kerrie Foxwell-Norton
Conservation research is essential for advancing knowledge but to make an impact scientific evidence must influence conservation policies, decision making and practice. This raises a multitude of challenges. How should evidence be collated and presented to policymakers to maximise its impact? How can effective collaboration between conservation scientists and decision-makers be established? How can the resulting messages be communicated to bring about change? Emerging from a successful international symposium organised by the British Ecological Society and the Cambridge Conservation Initiative, this is the first book to practically address these questions across a wide range of conservation topics. Well-renowned experts guide readers through global case studies and their own experiences. A must-read for practitioners, researchers, graduate students and policymakers wishing to enhance the prospect of their work 'making a difference'.
{"title":"Citizens and science: media, communication and conservation","authors":"E. Lester, Kerrie Foxwell-Norton","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.016","url":null,"abstract":"Conservation research is essential for advancing knowledge but to make an impact scientific evidence must influence conservation policies, decision making and practice. This raises a multitude of challenges. How should evidence be collated and presented to policymakers to maximise its impact? How can effective collaboration between conservation scientists and decision-makers be established? How can the resulting messages be communicated to bring about change? Emerging from a successful international symposium organised by the British Ecological Society and the Cambridge Conservation Initiative, this is the first book to practically address these questions across a wide range of conservation topics. Well-renowned experts guide readers through global case studies and their own experiences. A must-read for practitioners, researchers, graduate students and policymakers wishing to enhance the prospect of their work 'making a difference'.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125761688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.011
R. Freckleton
11.
11.
{"title":"Conservation decisions in the face of uncertainty","authors":"R. Freckleton","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.011","url":null,"abstract":"11.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131044204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.014
J. Young, C. Mitchell, S. Redpath
14.1 What do we mean by conservation conflicts and their management? Conflicts in conservation arise between individuals or groups of stakeholders whose strongly held opinions clash over conservation objectives and when one party is perceived to assert its interests at the expense of another (Redpath et al., 2013). Such conflicts can take many forms. For example, conflicts may occur between those wanting to conserve large carnivores and those wanting to control themdue to their impacts on livestock, or between thosewanting to conserve habitats in protected areas and the communities being moved out of those areas. In light of the potential negative impacts on conservation, livelihoods and well-being, managing such conflicts is key to enabling effective conservation. Conflicts around conservation derive from the fact that the state of nature is socially constructed and has different meanings to different people. Conflicts arise from issues of identity and choices about how the land and sea are used, as well as the uneven distribution of the associated costs and benefits associated with the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems. These issues reflect the power relations acting across societies over time (Radkau, 2008). The state of nature, which ties into ideas of what is ‘natural’ and ‘acceptable’, is therefore inherently mainly a political matter. As such, conflict, defined as ‘the pursuit of incompatible goals by different groups’ (Ramsbotham et al., 2011, p. 30), is intrinsic to its conservation (Adams, 2015).
14.1保育冲突及其管理是什么意思?保护冲突发生在个人或利益相关者群体之间，他们对保护目标持有强烈的意见冲突，当一方被认为以牺牲另一方的利益为代价来维护自己的利益时(Redpath et al.， 2013)。这种冲突可以有多种形式。例如，由于大型食肉动物对牲畜的影响，那些想要保护它们的人和那些想要控制它们的人之间可能会发生冲突，或者那些想要保护保护区栖息地的人和正在从这些地区迁出的社区之间可能会发生冲突。鉴于对保护、生计和福祉的潜在负面影响，管理此类冲突是实现有效保护的关键。围绕保护的冲突源于这样一个事实，即自然状态是社会建构的，对不同的人有不同的意义。冲突的起因是关于如何利用陆地和海洋的身份和选择问题，以及与保护生物多样性和生态系统有关的成本和收益分配不均。这些问题反映了随着时间的推移，跨社会的权力关系(Radkau, 2008)。因此，自然状态与“自然”和“可接受”的概念联系在一起，本质上主要是一个政治问题。因此，冲突被定义为“不同群体追求不相容的目标”(Ramsbotham等人，2011年，第30页)，是其保护的内在因素(Adams, 2015年)。
{"title":"Approaches to conflict management and brokering between groups","authors":"J. Young, C. Mitchell, S. Redpath","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.014","url":null,"abstract":"14.1 What do we mean by conservation conflicts and their management? Conflicts in conservation arise between individuals or groups of stakeholders whose strongly held opinions clash over conservation objectives and when one party is perceived to assert its interests at the expense of another (Redpath et al., 2013). Such conflicts can take many forms. For example, conflicts may occur between those wanting to conserve large carnivores and those wanting to control themdue to their impacts on livestock, or between thosewanting to conserve habitats in protected areas and the communities being moved out of those areas. In light of the potential negative impacts on conservation, livelihoods and well-being, managing such conflicts is key to enabling effective conservation. Conflicts around conservation derive from the fact that the state of nature is socially constructed and has different meanings to different people. Conflicts arise from issues of identity and choices about how the land and sea are used, as well as the uneven distribution of the associated costs and benefits associated with the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems. These issues reflect the power relations acting across societies over time (Radkau, 2008). The state of nature, which ties into ideas of what is ‘natural’ and ‘acceptable’, is therefore inherently mainly a political matter. As such, conflict, defined as ‘the pursuit of incompatible goals by different groups’ (Ramsbotham et al., 2011, p. 30), is intrinsic to its conservation (Adams, 2015).","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125648809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.008
L. Dicks, B. Livoreil, Rebecca K. Smith, H. Wittmer, J. Young
8.
8.
{"title":"Aligning evidence for use in decisions: mechanisms to link collated evidence to the needs of policy-makers and practitioners","authors":"L. Dicks, B. Livoreil, Rebecca K. Smith, H. Wittmer, J. Young","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.008","url":null,"abstract":"8.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132841670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.018
T. Park
18.
18.
{"title":"Behavioural insights for conservation and sustainability","authors":"T. Park","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.018","url":null,"abstract":"18.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121661064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-04-16DOI: 10.1017/9781108638210.004
J. Altringham, A. Berthinussen, C. Wordley
4.
4.
{"title":"Generating, collating and using evidence for conservation","authors":"J. Altringham, A. Berthinussen, C. Wordley","doi":"10.1017/9781108638210.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108638210.004","url":null,"abstract":"4.","PeriodicalId":272960,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Research, Policy and Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129876137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：