首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Collaborative Engineering最新文献

英文 中文
Knowledge Management in collaborative engineering 协同工程中的知识管理
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027442
W. ElMaraghy
Collaboration has always been a key driving force behind human civilisation, and an integral part of the engineering profession. Engineered systems such as manufacturing systems and information systems are generally complex. Knowledge is inextricably bound up with human cognition, and the management of knowledge occurs within a complex environment. It is also essential for those designing KM systems to consider the human and social factors at play in the production and use of knowledge. This paper presents a systems analysis and design approach to support the design information and the methodologies needed for both a comprehensive and consistent design process.
合作一直是人类文明背后的关键驱动力,也是工程专业不可或缺的一部分。工程系统,如制造系统和信息系统通常是复杂的。知识与人类的认知有着千丝万缕的联系,知识的管理是在一个复杂的环境中进行的。对于那些设计知识管理系统的人来说,考虑在知识的生产和使用中起作用的人和社会因素也是至关重要的。本文提出了一种系统分析和设计方法,以支持全面和一致的设计过程所需的设计信息和方法。
{"title":"Knowledge Management in collaborative engineering","authors":"W. ElMaraghy","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027442","url":null,"abstract":"Collaboration has always been a key driving force behind human civilisation, and an integral part of the engineering profession. Engineered systems such as manufacturing systems and information systems are generally complex. Knowledge is inextricably bound up with human cognition, and the management of knowledge occurs within a complex environment. It is also essential for those designing KM systems to consider the human and social factors at play in the production and use of knowledge. This paper presents a systems analysis and design approach to support the design information and the methodologies needed for both a comprehensive and consistent design process.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116380024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
The foundations of collaborative group decisions 协作群体决策的基础
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027438
R. Keeney
Collaborative engineering requires collaborative group decisions. This paper presents foundations for a collaborative group decision model, and offers suggestions on how to implement such a model. Specifically, decision analysis techniques are explained to provide a sound foundation and a helpful tool to guide collaborative group decisions. These techniques do not oversimplify the realities of collaborative group decisions. They explicitly knowledge differences of judgements and values among group members and offer a constructive framework to account for these differences in the decision process.
协同工程需要协同的团队决策。本文提出了协作群体决策模型的基础,并对如何实现该模型提出了建议。具体地说,决策分析技术被解释为提供一个良好的基础和一个有用的工具来指导协作群体决策。这些技术并没有过度简化协作团队决策的现实。他们明确地了解群体成员之间的判断和价值观差异,并提供一个建设性的框架来解释决策过程中的这些差异。
{"title":"The foundations of collaborative group decisions","authors":"R. Keeney","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027438","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027438","url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative engineering requires collaborative group decisions. This paper presents foundations for a collaborative group decision model, and offers suggestions on how to implement such a model. Specifically, decision analysis techniques are explained to provide a sound foundation and a helpful tool to guide collaborative group decisions. These techniques do not oversimplify the realities of collaborative group decisions. They explicitly knowledge differences of judgements and values among group members and offer a constructive framework to account for these differences in the decision process.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121157309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38
Collaborative engineering as a basic concept for teaching structuration 协同工程作为教学结构的基本概念
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027445
A. Bernard, N. Perry, P. Dépincé
Engineering education is evolving in a global context. Projects activities allow students structuring and applying the knowledge learned while facing problems. But, when taking into account MultiDisciplinary Optimisation (MDO), it is necessary to model and to exploit the all context and technical constraints. Two elements lead such approach. First of all, roadmaps give structured processes for the resolution of project objectives. Then, MDO allows solving local problems. The collaborative engineering needs to achieve the final choices based on the indications of strategic inputs, roadmaps and MDO results. This paper relates concrete experiences and proposes some progress for future engineering education.
工程教育在全球范围内不断发展。项目活动允许学生在面对问题时组织和应用所学的知识。但是,当考虑到多学科优化(MDO)时,有必要建模并利用所有上下文和技术限制。有两个因素导致了这种做法。首先,路线图为解决项目目标提供了结构化的过程。然后,MDO允许解决局部问题。协同工程需要根据战略输入、路线图和MDO结果的指示来实现最终选择。本文就工程教育的具体经验进行了阐述,并对今后的工程教育提出了一些建议。
{"title":"Collaborative engineering as a basic concept for teaching structuration","authors":"A. Bernard, N. Perry, P. Dépincé","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027445","url":null,"abstract":"Engineering education is evolving in a global context. Projects activities allow students structuring and applying the knowledge learned while facing problems. But, when taking into account MultiDisciplinary Optimisation (MDO), it is necessary to model and to exploit the all context and technical constraints. Two elements lead such approach. First of all, roadmaps give structured processes for the resolution of project objectives. Then, MDO allows solving local problems. The collaborative engineering needs to achieve the final choices based on the indications of strategic inputs, roadmaps and MDO results. This paper relates concrete experiences and proposes some progress for future engineering education.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127002838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The innovation pump: supporting creative processes in collaborative engineering 创新泵:支持协同工程中的创造性过程
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027440
Xavier Llorà, D. Goldberg
The pervasive expansion of computers and internet has change the way people collaborate. Cybercollaboratories for collaborative engineering in form of web boards, blogs, e-mails, and instant messaging have become de facto mainstream communication channels. This paper reviews the new framework set after these technologies and presents how collaborative creativity and innovation can be modelled and supported using computational models. The paper continues presenting an innovation-support model based on the usage of genetic algorithms as computational metaphors of human innovation. The paper also discuses the results achieved using the proposed technologies in real-world collaborative creative processes.
计算机和互联网的普及已经改变了人们合作的方式。以网页板、博客、电子邮件和即时消息传递形式进行协作工程的网络协作实验室已经成为事实上的主流通信渠道。本文回顾了在这些技术之后建立的新框架,并介绍了如何使用计算模型对协作创造力和创新进行建模和支持。本文继续提出了一种基于使用遗传算法作为人类创新的计算隐喻的创新支持模型。本文还讨论了在现实世界的协作创作过程中使用所提出的技术所取得的结果。
{"title":"The innovation pump: supporting creative processes in collaborative engineering","authors":"Xavier Llorà, D. Goldberg","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027440","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027440","url":null,"abstract":"The pervasive expansion of computers and internet has change the way people collaborate. Cybercollaboratories for collaborative engineering in form of web boards, blogs, e-mails, and instant messaging have become de facto mainstream communication channels. This paper reviews the new framework set after these technologies and presents how collaborative creativity and innovation can be modelled and supported using computational models. The paper continues presenting an innovation-support model based on the usage of genetic algorithms as computational metaphors of human innovation. The paper also discuses the results achieved using the proposed technologies in real-world collaborative creative processes.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"28 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125996213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collective rationality of group decisions in collaborative engineering 协同工程中群体决策的集体合理性
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027439
S. Lu
Collaborative engineering is a dynamic socio-technical activity where a team of stakeholders works collaboratively to make group decisions based on collective rationality. This paper examines various impossibility conditions and possibility requirements for the existence of collective rationality from both theoretical and practical standpoints. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is examined in light of the special characteristics of collaborative engineering problems. Since from a theoretical standpoint, no social welfare function can satisfy Arrow's rationality conditions of group decisions, this paper suggests some practical methods to guide collaborative engineering teams through teamwork and task-work iterations to approach collective rationality systematically when making group decisions.
协同工程是一种动态的社会技术活动,其中一组利益相关者协同工作,根据集体理性做出群体决策。本文从理论和实践两个角度考察了集体理性存在的各种不可能条件和可能性要求。针对协同工程问题的特点,研究了阿罗不可能定理。由于从理论角度出发,任何社会福利函数都不能满足阿罗的群体决策合理性条件,因此本文提出了一些实用的方法,通过团队合作和任务-工作迭代,引导协同工程团队在进行群体决策时系统地接近集体理性。
{"title":"Collective rationality of group decisions in collaborative engineering","authors":"S. Lu","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027439","url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative engineering is a dynamic socio-technical activity where a team of stakeholders works collaboratively to make group decisions based on collective rationality. This paper examines various impossibility conditions and possibility requirements for the existence of collective rationality from both theoretical and practical standpoints. Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is examined in light of the special characteristics of collaborative engineering problems. Since from a theoretical standpoint, no social welfare function can satisfy Arrow's rationality conditions of group decisions, this paper suggests some practical methods to guide collaborative engineering teams through teamwork and task-work iterations to approach collective rationality systematically when making group decisions.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123115759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Argumentation-based negotiation for collaborative engineering design 基于论证的协同工程设计协商
Pub Date : 2009-07-27 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027443
Yan Jin, Mathieu Geslin
Designing complex systems requires collaboration among multiple engineers who coordinate to plan tasks, cooperate to resolve dependencies, and co-construct to identify shared objectives and solutions. While collaboration technologies have been developed to date, few can help designers negotiate effectively and reach agreement efficiently. In this paper, we propose an argumentation based engineering negotiation approach that provides a structured framework for designers to specify design situations, compose arguments, and make joint decisions by following various strategies. The details of the proposed approach are described and a case study is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
设计复杂的系统需要多个工程师之间的协作,他们协调计划任务,合作解决依赖关系,共同构建以确定共享的目标和解决方案。虽然协作技术已经发展到今天,但很少有能够帮助设计人员有效地进行协商并有效地达成协议。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于论证的工程协商方法,该方法为设计师提供了一个结构化的框架,以指定设计情况,撰写论证,并通过遵循各种策略做出联合决策。本文描述了该方法的细节,并给出了一个案例研究来证明该方法的有效性。
{"title":"Argumentation-based negotiation for collaborative engineering design","authors":"Yan Jin, Mathieu Geslin","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027443","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027443","url":null,"abstract":"Designing complex systems requires collaboration among multiple engineers who coordinate to plan tasks, cooperate to resolve dependencies, and co-construct to identify shared objectives and solutions. While collaboration technologies have been developed to date, few can help designers negotiate effectively and reach agreement efficiently. In this paper, we propose an argumentation based engineering negotiation approach that provides a structured framework for designers to specify design situations, compose arguments, and make joint decisions by following various strategies. The details of the proposed approach are described and a case study is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132798425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20
Designing and engineering through collaboration and negotiation 通过合作和协商进行设计和工程
Pub Date : 2009-07-24 DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2009.027437
N. Suh
The development of complex engineering systems requires collaboration and negotiation. It is to make correct decisions based on customer needs, Functional Requirements, Design Parameters, and Process Variables. There are two basic elements: the system and the process used for collaboration and negotiation. The system is to assure that the project has the best information and knowledge. Systems and processes are needed to minimise the cost of development, to execute the project on schedule, and to deliver a highly robust, efficient and reliable product. This paper proposes heuristic rules for collaboration and negotiation based on axiomatic design theory and complexity theory.
复杂工程系统的开发需要协作和协商。它是基于客户需求、功能需求、设计参数和过程变量做出正确的决策。有两个基本要素:用于协作和谈判的系统和过程。该系统是为了保证项目拥有最好的信息和知识。需要系统和流程来最小化开发成本,按时执行项目,并交付高度健壮、高效和可靠的产品。基于公理化设计理论和复杂性理论,提出了协作与协商的启发式规则。
{"title":"Designing and engineering through collaboration and negotiation","authors":"N. Suh","doi":"10.1504/IJCE.2009.027437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCE.2009.027437","url":null,"abstract":"The development of complex engineering systems requires collaboration and negotiation. It is to make correct decisions based on customer needs, Functional Requirements, Design Parameters, and Process Variables. There are two basic elements: the system and the process used for collaboration and negotiation. The system is to assure that the project has the best information and knowledge. Systems and processes are needed to minimise the cost of development, to execute the project on schedule, and to deliver a highly robust, efficient and reliable product. This paper proposes heuristic rules for collaboration and negotiation based on axiomatic design theory and complexity theory.","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134132633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Cross-disciplinary learning in environmental engineering and landscape architecture 环境工程和景观建筑的跨学科学习
Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1504/ijce.2020.10033950
Graham Smith, E. LoGiudice, M. Walter, Kimberly M. Williams, S. Allred, C. Georgakakos, J. Cerra
{"title":"Cross-disciplinary learning in environmental engineering and landscape architecture","authors":"Graham Smith, E. LoGiudice, M. Walter, Kimberly M. Williams, S. Allred, C. Georgakakos, J. Cerra","doi":"10.1504/ijce.2020.10033950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijce.2020.10033950","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":275090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Collaborative Engineering","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131285620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Collaborative Engineering
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1