Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras最新文献

英文中文

Translating Texts: Contrasting Roman and Jewish Depictions of Literary Translations 翻译文本:对比罗马和犹太人对文学翻译的描述

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-010

S. Adams

The Greek and Roman worlds were polyglot, and although Greek and Latin were dominant in particular regions (East and West, respectively), this impression of linguist uniformity hardly hid a complex linguistic terrain. Indeed, across the Hellenistic and Roman Empires local languages continued to interact and shape the way that the dominant language users engaged with their conquered others. This political and cultural conquest resulted in the need to develop new methods of engagement and communication, both oral and written. Setting aside the act of oral translation, for which we have very little surviving evidence (although we know that it took place frequently),1 we find that discussion of text translation was not prominent. This is not to claim that translation was not a recognised element of ancient culture, but that it was so common that it did not warrant comment.2 Literary texts, however, were translated far less frequently and undertaken with a particular purpose(s) in mind. In this chapter I will evaluate and contrast the ways that Roman and Jewish writers articulated their understanding of literary translation. This comparison is valuable as translators from both cultures engage with Greek literature, but do so from very different perspectives and positions. Accordingly, in order to have a fuller understanding of literary translation in antiquity, one must compare the different ways and purposes for translation that stem from both dominant and non-dominant peoples. It is this comparison that provides substantial insights into the nature of literary translation and highlights specific elements that are distinctive to particular groups. This chapter does not only look at specific literary translations and how the rendered text aligns with the original, although many of such texts will be consulted. Rather, the purpose of this investigation is also to evaluate how literary translation is discussed and presented by authors with the intentionality and purpose being of primary importance. We will begin by briefly looking at some school texts that give insight into the training a student received with regard to translating texts. Following this we will assess the expressed purposes and functions of translation in the Hellenistic and Roman eras with a particular eye towards how Roman and Jewish authors engaged

希腊和罗马世界是多语言的，尽管希腊语和拉丁语在特定地区(分别是东方和西方)占主导地位，但这种语言学一致性的印象很难掩盖复杂的语言地形。事实上，在希腊化和罗马帝国时期，当地语言继续相互作用，并形成了主导语言使用者与被征服的其他语言交流的方式。这种政治和文化的征服导致需要发展新的接触和交流方法，包括口头和书面。撇开口头翻译的行为不谈(尽管我们知道它经常发生)，我们发现关于文本翻译的讨论并不突出。这并不是说翻译不是古代文化的一个公认因素，而是说翻译太普遍了，不值得评论然而，文学文本的翻译频率要低得多，并且是为了特定的目的而进行的。在本章中，我将评估和对比罗马和犹太作家表达他们对文学翻译的理解的方式。这种比较对于来自两种文化的译者来说是有价值的，因为他们从不同的角度和立场来理解希腊文学。因此，为了更全面地了解古代文学翻译，我们必须比较优势民族和非优势民族的不同翻译方式和目的。正是这种比较提供了对文学翻译本质的实质性见解，并突出了特定群体特有的特定元素。本章不只是看具体的文学翻译和翻译文本如何与原文对齐，尽管许多这样的文本将被参考。相反，本研究的目的还在于评估作者是如何讨论和呈现文学翻译的，其中意向性和目的是最重要的。我们将首先简要地看看一些学校的课文，这些课文可以深入了解学生在翻译课文方面所接受的训练。接下来，我们将评估希腊化和罗马时代翻译的表达目的和功能，特别关注罗马和犹太作者是如何参与的

{"title":"Translating Texts: Contrasting Roman and Jewish Depictions of Literary Translations","authors":"S. Adams","doi":"10.1515/9783110660982-010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110660982-010","url":null,"abstract":"The Greek and Roman worlds were polyglot, and although Greek and Latin were dominant in particular regions (East and West, respectively), this impression of linguist uniformity hardly hid a complex linguistic terrain. Indeed, across the Hellenistic and Roman Empires local languages continued to interact and shape the way that the dominant language users engaged with their conquered others. This political and cultural conquest resulted in the need to develop new methods of engagement and communication, both oral and written. Setting aside the act of oral translation, for which we have very little surviving evidence (although we know that it took place frequently),1 we find that discussion of text translation was not prominent. This is not to claim that translation was not a recognised element of ancient culture, but that it was so common that it did not warrant comment.2 Literary texts, however, were translated far less frequently and undertaken with a particular purpose(s) in mind. In this chapter I will evaluate and contrast the ways that Roman and Jewish writers articulated their understanding of literary translation. This comparison is valuable as translators from both cultures engage with Greek literature, but do so from very different perspectives and positions. Accordingly, in order to have a fuller understanding of literary translation in antiquity, one must compare the different ways and purposes for translation that stem from both dominant and non-dominant peoples. It is this comparison that provides substantial insights into the nature of literary translation and highlights specific elements that are distinctive to particular groups. This chapter does not only look at specific literary translations and how the rendered text aligns with the original, although many of such texts will be consulted. Rather, the purpose of this investigation is also to evaluate how literary translation is discussed and presented by authors with the intentionality and purpose being of primary importance. We will begin by briefly looking at some school texts that give insight into the training a student received with regard to translating texts. Following this we will assess the expressed purposes and functions of translation in the Hellenistic and Roman eras with a particular eye towards how Roman and Jewish authors engaged","PeriodicalId":283195,"journal":{"name":"Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125533697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rabbis as Intellectuals in the Context of Graeco-Roman and Byzantine Christian Scholasticism 希腊罗马和拜占庭基督教经院哲学背景下的知识分子拉比

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-011

C. Hezser

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Themes in Ancient Scholarship 引言:古代学术的主题

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-002

S. Adams

This volume is a collection of papers presented at ‘Ancient Scholarship: Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras’, a conference funded by the British Academy and held at the University of Glasgow, UK on 27–28 April 2017. The purpose of this conference was to investigate scholastic culture in the Hellenistic and Roman eras, with a particular focus on ancient book and material culture as well as scholarship beyond Greek authors and the Greek language. Although ancient scholarship is a burgeoning field of study, a majority of investigations have focused primarily (and sometimes exclusively) on Greek scholarship and do not readily engage with the literature and languages of other cultures.1 Such studies are valuable contributions, but they do not represent the breadth of scholastic activity undertaken in antiquity. Accordingly, one of the major contributions of this work is the inclusion of multiple perspectives and its contributors engage not only with elements of Greek scholastic culture, but also bring Greek ideas into conversation with developing Latin scholarship (see chapters by Dickey, Nicholls, Marshall) and the perspective of a minority culture (i.e., Jewish authors) (see chapters by Hezser, Adams). This multicultural perspective is an important next step in the discussion of ancient scholarship and this volume provides a starting point for future inquiries. In particular, the essays in this volume make important contributions and provide fresh insight into a few, specific areas. First, one of the fundamental aspects of this collection is the importance of book culture and the materiality of scholarship. Many works on ancient scholarship are limited to discussions of specific authors, texts, and ideas, but do not take into account the means by which scholarship is accomplished in ancient times. This singular focus is a clear oversight of the highly complex and interconnected nature of scholastic research. As a result, the importance of the intersection of text and scholar is highlighted in a number of chapters and is one of the theoretical underpinnings of this volume. This framework is evident in the chapter by Stephanie Roussou, ‘New Readings in the Text of Herodian’. Although Roussou provides fresh proposals for Herodian’s Περὶ καθολικῆς προσῳδίας (On Prosody in General), her discussion is not limited only to the text as reconstructed. Rather, Roussou also evaluates newly-discovered manuscripts and discusses what they mean for our understanding of Herodian, his work and its reception, and the scholastic environment in which he wrote and in which

本卷是在“古代奖学金:在希腊和罗马时代的学术文化”，由英国学院资助的会议上提出的论文的集合，并在格拉斯哥大学举行，英国在2017年4月27日至28日。这次会议的目的是研究希腊化和罗马时代的学术文化，特别关注古代书籍和物质文化，以及希腊作家和希腊语言以外的学术。尽管古代学术是一个新兴的研究领域，但大多数研究主要集中在(有时完全集中在)希腊学术上，而不愿与其他文化的文学和语言接触这些研究是有价值的贡献，但它们并不能代表古代学术活动的广度。因此，这本书的主要贡献之一是包含了多种观点，它的贡献者不仅参与了希腊学术文化的元素，而且还将希腊的思想与发展中的拉丁学术(见迪基，尼科尔斯，马歇尔的章节)和少数民族文化(即犹太作家)的观点进行了对话(见希泽，亚当斯的章节)。这种多元文化的观点是一个重要的下一步在古代学术的讨论和本卷提供了一个起点，为未来的调查。特别是，在这一卷的文章作出重要贡献，并提供新的见解到一些，具体领域。首先，这个收藏的一个基本方面是书籍文化的重要性和学术的重要性。许多关于古代学术的著作都局限于对特定作者、文本和思想的讨论，而没有考虑到古代学术成就的手段。这种单一的关注显然是对学术研究高度复杂和相互联系的本质的忽视。因此，文本和学者的交叉的重要性是突出在一些章节，是本卷的理论基础之一。这个框架在Stephanie Roussou的章节中很明显，“Herodian文本的新阅读”。虽然Roussou为希律王的Περ καθολικ ο ς προσ ο δ末梢ας (On Prosody in General)提供了新的建议，但她的讨论并不局限于重构的文本。相反，卢梭还评估了新发现的手稿，并讨论了它们对我们理解希律的意义，他的作品及其接受，以及他写作的学术环境

{"title":"Introduction: Themes in Ancient Scholarship","authors":"S. Adams","doi":"10.1515/9783110660982-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110660982-002","url":null,"abstract":"This volume is a collection of papers presented at ‘Ancient Scholarship: Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras’, a conference funded by the British Academy and held at the University of Glasgow, UK on 27–28 April 2017. The purpose of this conference was to investigate scholastic culture in the Hellenistic and Roman eras, with a particular focus on ancient book and material culture as well as scholarship beyond Greek authors and the Greek language. Although ancient scholarship is a burgeoning field of study, a majority of investigations have focused primarily (and sometimes exclusively) on Greek scholarship and do not readily engage with the literature and languages of other cultures.1 Such studies are valuable contributions, but they do not represent the breadth of scholastic activity undertaken in antiquity. Accordingly, one of the major contributions of this work is the inclusion of multiple perspectives and its contributors engage not only with elements of Greek scholastic culture, but also bring Greek ideas into conversation with developing Latin scholarship (see chapters by Dickey, Nicholls, Marshall) and the perspective of a minority culture (i.e., Jewish authors) (see chapters by Hezser, Adams). This multicultural perspective is an important next step in the discussion of ancient scholarship and this volume provides a starting point for future inquiries. In particular, the essays in this volume make important contributions and provide fresh insight into a few, specific areas. First, one of the fundamental aspects of this collection is the importance of book culture and the materiality of scholarship. Many works on ancient scholarship are limited to discussions of specific authors, texts, and ideas, but do not take into account the means by which scholarship is accomplished in ancient times. This singular focus is a clear oversight of the highly complex and interconnected nature of scholastic research. As a result, the importance of the intersection of text and scholar is highlighted in a number of chapters and is one of the theoretical underpinnings of this volume. This framework is evident in the chapter by Stephanie Roussou, ‘New Readings in the Text of Herodian’. Although Roussou provides fresh proposals for Herodian’s Περὶ καθολικῆς προσῳδίας (On Prosody in General), her discussion is not limited only to the text as reconstructed. Rather, Roussou also evaluates newly-discovered manuscripts and discusses what they mean for our understanding of Herodian, his work and its reception, and the scholastic environment in which he wrote and in which","PeriodicalId":283195,"journal":{"name":"Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121664599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

‘Bookish Places’ in Imperial Rome: Bookshops and the Urban Landscape of Learning 罗马帝国的“书香之地”:书店与城市学习景观

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-005

M. Nicholls

引用次数: 1

Circulation of Lexica in the Hellenistic and Early Imperial Period 希腊化和早期帝国时期《词典》的流通

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-004

Myrto Hatzimichali

引用次数: 0

Works Cited 作品的引用

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-015

引用次数: 0

What does a Linguistic Expert Know? The Conflict between Analogy and Atticism 语言专家知道什么?类比与批判的冲突

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-008

Eleanor Dickey

引用次数: 0

Suetonius the Bibliographer Suetonius是书目学家

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-009

R. Marshall

引用次数: 0

New Readings in the Text of Herodian 希律书文本的新解读

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-007

Stephanie Roussou

引用次数: 0

Scholastic Research in the Archive? Hellenistic Historians and Ancient Archival Records 档案中的学术研究?希腊化历史学家和古代档案记录

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

Pub Date : 2019-09-23 DOI: 10.1515/9783110660982-003

Gaëlle Coqueugniot

引用次数: 0

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Scholastic Culture in the Hellenistic and Roman Eras

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀