Christos Dimoulas, Scott Moore, Aslan Askarov, Stephen Chong
In capability-safe languages, components can access a resource only if they possess a capability for that resource. As a result, a programmer can prevent an untrusted component from accessing a sensitive resource by ensuring that the component never acquires the corresponding capability. In order to reason about which components may use a sensitive resource it is necessary to reason about how capabilities propagate through a system. This may be difficult, or, in the case of dynamically composed code, impossible to do before running the system. To counter this situation, we propose extensions to capability-safe languages that restrict the use of capabilities according to declarative policies. We introduce two independently useful semantic security policies to regulate capabilities and describe language-based mechanisms that enforce them. Access control policies restrict which components may use a capability and are enforced using higher-order contracts. Integrity policies restrict which components may influence (directly or indirectly) the use of a capability and are enforced using an information-flow type system. Finally, we describe how programmers can dynamically and soundly combine components that enforce access control or integrity policies with components that enforce different policies or even no policy at all.
{"title":"Declarative Policies for Capability Control","authors":"Christos Dimoulas, Scott Moore, Aslan Askarov, Stephen Chong","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.9","url":null,"abstract":"In capability-safe languages, components can access a resource only if they possess a capability for that resource. As a result, a programmer can prevent an untrusted component from accessing a sensitive resource by ensuring that the component never acquires the corresponding capability. In order to reason about which components may use a sensitive resource it is necessary to reason about how capabilities propagate through a system. This may be difficult, or, in the case of dynamically composed code, impossible to do before running the system. To counter this situation, we propose extensions to capability-safe languages that restrict the use of capabilities according to declarative policies. We introduce two independently useful semantic security policies to regulate capabilities and describe language-based mechanisms that enforce them. Access control policies restrict which components may use a capability and are enforced using higher-order contracts. Integrity policies restrict which components may influence (directly or indirectly) the use of a capability and are enforced using an information-flow type system. Finally, we describe how programmers can dynamically and soundly combine components that enforce access control or integrity policies with components that enforce different policies or even no policy at all.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134104386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite Alice's best efforts, her long-term secret keys may be revealed to an adversary. Possible reasons include weakly generated keys, compromised key storage, subpoena, and coercion. However, Alice may still be able to communicate securely with other parties, depending on the protocol used. We call the associated property resilience against Actor Key Compromise (AKC). We formalise this property in a symbolic model and identify conditions under which it can and cannot be achieved. In case studies that include TLS and SSH, we find that many protocols are not resilient against AKC. We implement a concrete AKC attack on the mutually authenticated TLS protocol.
{"title":"Actor Key Compromise: Consequences and Countermeasures","authors":"D. Basin, C. Cremers, Marko Horvat","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.25","url":null,"abstract":"Despite Alice's best efforts, her long-term secret keys may be revealed to an adversary. Possible reasons include weakly generated keys, compromised key storage, subpoena, and coercion. However, Alice may still be able to communicate securely with other parties, depending on the protocol used. We call the associated property resilience against Actor Key Compromise (AKC). We formalise this property in a symbolic model and identify conditions under which it can and cannot be achieved. In case studies that include TLS and SSH, we find that many protocols are not resilient against AKC. We implement a concrete AKC attack on the mutually authenticated TLS protocol.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127297690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Vanhoef, Willem De Groef, Dominique Devriese, F. Piessens, Tamara Rezk
We propose a novel mechanism for enforcing information flow policies with support for declassification on event-driven programs. Declassification policies consist of two functions. First, a projection function specifies for each confidential event what information in the event can be declassified directly. This generalizes the traditional security labelling of inputs. Second, a stateful release function specifies the aggregate information about all confidential events seen so far that can be declassified. We provide evidence that such declassification policies are useful in the context of Java Script web applications. An enforcement mechanism for our policies is presented and its soundness and precision is proven. Finally, we give evidence of practicality by implementing and evaluating the mechanism in a browser.
{"title":"Stateful Declassification Policies for Event-Driven Programs","authors":"M. Vanhoef, Willem De Groef, Dominique Devriese, F. Piessens, Tamara Rezk","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.28","url":null,"abstract":"We propose a novel mechanism for enforcing information flow policies with support for declassification on event-driven programs. Declassification policies consist of two functions. First, a projection function specifies for each confidential event what information in the event can be declassified directly. This generalizes the traditional security labelling of inputs. Second, a stateful release function specifies the aggregate information about all confidential events seen so far that can be declassified. We provide evidence that such declassification policies are useful in the context of Java Script web applications. An enforcement mechanism for our policies is presented and its soundness and precision is proven. Finally, we give evidence of practicality by implementing and evaluating the mechanism in a browser.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132488635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A number of systems have been developed for dynamic information flow control (IFC). In such systems, the security policy is expressed by labeling input and output channels, it is enforced by tracking and checking labels on data. Systems have been proven to enforce some form of noninterference (NI), formalized as a property of two runs of the program. In practice, NI is too strong and it is desirable to enforce some relaxation of NI that allows downgrading under constraints that have been classified as 'what', 'where', 'who', or 'when' policies. To encompass a broad range of policies, relational logic has been proposed as a means to specify and statically enforce policy. This paper shows how relational logic policies can be dynamically checked. To do so, we provide a new account of monitoring, in which the monitor state is viewed as an abstract interpretation of sets of pairs of program runs.
{"title":"Information Flow Monitoring as Abstract Interpretation for Relational Logic","authors":"A. Chudnov, George Kuan, D. Naumann","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.12","url":null,"abstract":"A number of systems have been developed for dynamic information flow control (IFC). In such systems, the security policy is expressed by labeling input and output channels, it is enforced by tracking and checking labels on data. Systems have been proven to enforce some form of noninterference (NI), formalized as a property of two runs of the program. In practice, NI is too strong and it is desirable to enforce some relaxation of NI that allows downgrading under constraints that have been classified as 'what', 'where', 'who', or 'when' policies. To encompass a broad range of policies, relational logic has been proposed as a means to specify and statically enforce policy. This paper shows how relational logic policies can be dynamically checked. To do so, we provide a new account of monitoring, in which the monitor state is viewed as an abstract interpretation of sets of pairs of program runs.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130902822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated analysis of protocols involving Diffie-Hellman key exchange is challenging, in part because of the undecidability of the unification problem in relevant theories. In this paper, we justify the use of a more restricted theory that includes multiplication of exponents but not addition, providing unitary and efficient unification. To justify this theory, we compare it to a computational model of non-uniform circuit complexity through several incremental steps. First, we give a model closely analogous to the computational model, in which derivability is modeled by closure under simple algebraic transformations. This model retains many of the complex features of the computational model, including defining success based on asymptotic probability for a non-uniform family of strategies. We describe an intermediate model based on formal polynomial manipulations, in which success is exact and there is no longer a parametrized notion of the strategy. Despite the many differences in form, we are able to prove an equivalence between the asymptotic and intermediate models by showing that a sufficiently successful asymptotic strategy implies the existence of a perfect strategy. Finally, we describe a symbolic model in which addition of exponents is not modeled, and prove that (for expressible problems), the symbolic model is equivalent to the intermediate model.
{"title":"Modeling Diffie-Hellman Derivability for Automated Analysis","authors":"Moses D. Liskov, F. Thayer","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.24","url":null,"abstract":"Automated analysis of protocols involving Diffie-Hellman key exchange is challenging, in part because of the undecidability of the unification problem in relevant theories. In this paper, we justify the use of a more restricted theory that includes multiplication of exponents but not addition, providing unitary and efficient unification. To justify this theory, we compare it to a computational model of non-uniform circuit complexity through several incremental steps. First, we give a model closely analogous to the computational model, in which derivability is modeled by closure under simple algebraic transformations. This model retains many of the complex features of the computational model, including defining success based on asymptotic probability for a non-uniform family of strategies. We describe an intermediate model based on formal polynomial manipulations, in which success is exact and there is no longer a parametrized notion of the strategy. Despite the many differences in form, we are able to prove an equivalence between the asymptotic and intermediate models by showing that a sufficiently successful asymptotic strategy implies the existence of a perfect strategy. Finally, we describe a symbolic model in which addition of exponents is not modeled, and prove that (for expressible problems), the symbolic model is equivalent to the intermediate model.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123898689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The anonymous communication protocol Tor constitutes the most widely deployed technology for providing anonymity for user communication over the Internet. Several frameworks have been proposed that show strong anonymity guarantees, none of these, however, are capable of modeling the class of traffic-related timing attacks against Tor, such as traffic correlation and website fingerprinting. In this work, we present TUC: the first framework that allows for establishing strong anonymity guarantees in the presence of time-sensitive adversaries that mount traffic-related timing attacks. TUC incorporates a comprehensive notion of time in an asynchronous communication model with sequential activation, while offering strong compositionality properties for security proofs. We apply TUC to evaluate a novel countermeasure for Tor against website fingerprinting attacks. Our analysis relies on a formalization of the onion routing protocol that underlies Tor and proves rigorous anonymity guarantees in the presence of traffic-related timing attacks.
{"title":"TUC: Time-Sensitive and Modular Analysis of Anonymous Communication","authors":"M. Backes, Praveen Manoharan, Esfandiar Mohammadi","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.34","url":null,"abstract":"The anonymous communication protocol Tor constitutes the most widely deployed technology for providing anonymity for user communication over the Internet. Several frameworks have been proposed that show strong anonymity guarantees, none of these, however, are capable of modeling the class of traffic-related timing attacks against Tor, such as traffic correlation and website fingerprinting. In this work, we present TUC: the first framework that allows for establishing strong anonymity guarantees in the presence of time-sensitive adversaries that mount traffic-related timing attacks. TUC incorporates a comprehensive notion of time in an asynchronous communication model with sequential activation, while offering strong compositionality properties for security proofs. We apply TUC to evaluate a novel countermeasure for Tor against website fingerprinting attacks. Our analysis relies on a formalization of the onion routing protocol that underlies Tor and proves rigorous anonymity guarantees in the presence of traffic-related timing attacks.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115393114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa Chase, Markulf Kohlweiss, Anna Lysyanskaya, S. Meiklejohn
A signature scheme is malleable if, on input a message and a signature, it is possible to efficiently compute a signature on a related message, for a transformation that is allowed with respect to this signature scheme. In this paper, we first provide new definitions for malleable signatures that allow us to capture a broader range of transformations than was previously possible. We then give a generic construction based on malleable zero-knowledge proofs that allows us to construct malleable signatures for a wide range of transformation classes, with security properties that are stronger than those that have been achieved previously. Finally, we construct delegatable anonymous credentials from signatures that are malleable with respect to an appropriate class of transformations (that we show our malleable signature supports). The resulting instantiation satisfies a stronger security notion than previous schemes while also scaling linearly with the number of delegations.
{"title":"Malleable Signatures: New Definitions and Delegatable Anonymous Credentials","authors":"Melissa Chase, Markulf Kohlweiss, Anna Lysyanskaya, S. Meiklejohn","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.22","url":null,"abstract":"A signature scheme is malleable if, on input a message and a signature, it is possible to efficiently compute a signature on a related message, for a transformation that is allowed with respect to this signature scheme. In this paper, we first provide new definitions for malleable signatures that allow us to capture a broader range of transformations than was previously possible. We then give a generic construction based on malleable zero-knowledge proofs that allows us to construct malleable signatures for a wide range of transformation classes, with security properties that are stronger than those that have been achieved previously. Finally, we construct delegatable anonymous credentials from signatures that are malleable with respect to an appropriate class of transformations (that we show our malleable signature supports). The resulting instantiation satisfies a stronger security notion than previous schemes while also scaling linearly with the number of delegations.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130545642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The perception of risk has been established as an important part of the study of human aspects of security research. Similarly, risk awareness is often considered a central precursor for the adoption of security mechanisms and how people use them and interact with them. However, the state of risk awareness in users during their everyday use of the modern Internet has not been studied in detail. While it is well known that users have a limited "budget" for security behavior and that trying to coerce them into considering additional risks does not work well, it remains unclear which risks are on users' minds and therefore already accounted for in terms of their budget. Hence, assessing which risks and which consequences users currently perceive when using information technology is an important and currently overlooked foundation to shape usability aspects of IT security mechanisms. In this paper, we present a survey of risk and consequence awareness in users, analyze how this may influence the current lack of adoption for improved security measures, and make recommendations how this situation can be alleviated.
{"title":"Who's Afraid of Which Bad Wolf? A Survey of IT Security Risk Awareness","authors":"M. Harbach, S. Fahl, Matthew Smith","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.15","url":null,"abstract":"The perception of risk has been established as an important part of the study of human aspects of security research. Similarly, risk awareness is often considered a central precursor for the adoption of security mechanisms and how people use them and interact with them. However, the state of risk awareness in users during their everyday use of the modern Internet has not been studied in detail. While it is well known that users have a limited \"budget\" for security behavior and that trying to coerce them into considering additional risks does not work well, it remains unclear which risks are on users' minds and therefore already accounted for in terms of their budget. Hence, assessing which risks and which consequences users currently perceive when using information technology is an important and currently overlooked foundation to shape usability aspects of IT security mechanisms. In this paper, we present a survey of risk and consequence awareness in users, analyze how this may influence the current lack of adoption for improved security measures, and make recommendations how this situation can be alleviated.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133585279","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joseph A. Akinyele, G. Barthe, B. Grégoire, Benedikt Schmidt, Pierre-Yves Strub
Many algorithms admit very efficient batch versions that compute simultaneously the output of the algorithms on a set of inputs. Batch algorithms are widely used in cryptography, especially in the setting of pairing-based computations, where they deliver significant speed-ups. AutoBatch is an automated tool that computes highly optimized batch verification algorithms for pairing-based signature schemes. Thanks to finely tuned heuristics, AutoBatch is able to rediscover efficient batch verifiers for several signature schemes of interest, and in some cases to output batch verifiers that outperform the best known verifiers from the literature. However, AutoBatch only provides weak guarantees (in the form of a LaTeX proof) of the correctness of the batch algorithms it outputs. In this paper, we verify the correctness and security of these algorithms using the EasyCrypt framework. To achieve this goal, we define a domain-specific language to describe verification algorithms based on pairings and provide an efficient algorithm for checking (approximate) observational equivalence between expressions of this language. By translating the output of AutoBatch to this language and applying our verification procedure, we obtain machine-checked correctness proofs of the batch verifiers. Moreover, we formalize notions of security for batch verifiers and we provide a generic proof in EasyCrypt that batch verifiers satisfy a security property called screening, provided they are correct and the original signature is unforgeable against chosen-message attacks. We apply our techniques to several well-known pairing-based signature schemes from the literature, and to Groth-Sahai zero-knowledge proofs.
{"title":"Certified Synthesis of Efficient Batch Verifiers","authors":"Joseph A. Akinyele, G. Barthe, B. Grégoire, Benedikt Schmidt, Pierre-Yves Strub","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.19","url":null,"abstract":"Many algorithms admit very efficient batch versions that compute simultaneously the output of the algorithms on a set of inputs. Batch algorithms are widely used in cryptography, especially in the setting of pairing-based computations, where they deliver significant speed-ups. AutoBatch is an automated tool that computes highly optimized batch verification algorithms for pairing-based signature schemes. Thanks to finely tuned heuristics, AutoBatch is able to rediscover efficient batch verifiers for several signature schemes of interest, and in some cases to output batch verifiers that outperform the best known verifiers from the literature. However, AutoBatch only provides weak guarantees (in the form of a LaTeX proof) of the correctness of the batch algorithms it outputs. In this paper, we verify the correctness and security of these algorithms using the EasyCrypt framework. To achieve this goal, we define a domain-specific language to describe verification algorithms based on pairings and provide an efficient algorithm for checking (approximate) observational equivalence between expressions of this language. By translating the output of AutoBatch to this language and applying our verification procedure, we obtain machine-checked correctness proofs of the batch verifiers. Moreover, we formalize notions of security for batch verifiers and we provide a generic proof in EasyCrypt that batch verifiers satisfy a security property called screening, provided they are correct and the original signature is unforgeable against chosen-message attacks. We apply our techniques to several well-known pairing-based signature schemes from the literature, and to Groth-Sahai zero-knowledge proofs.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124346835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Secure multi-party computation systems are commonly built from a small set of primitive components. The compos ability of security notions has a central role in the analysis of such systems, as it allows us to deduce security properties of complex protocols from the properties of its components. We show that the standard notions of universally compos able security are overly restrictive in this context and can lead to protocols with sub-optimal performance. As a remedy, we introduce a weaker notion of privacy that is satisfied by simpler protocols and is preserved by composition. After that we fix a passive security model and show how to convert a private protocol into a universally compos able protocol. As a result, we obtain modular security proofs without performance penalties.
{"title":"From Input Private to Universally Composable Secure Multi-party Computation Primitives","authors":"D. Bogdanov, Peeter Laud, S. Laur, Pille Pullonen","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2014.21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.21","url":null,"abstract":"Secure multi-party computation systems are commonly built from a small set of primitive components. The compos ability of security notions has a central role in the analysis of such systems, as it allows us to deduce security properties of complex protocols from the properties of its components. We show that the standard notions of universally compos able security are overly restrictive in this context and can lead to protocols with sub-optimal performance. As a remedy, we introduce a weaker notion of privacy that is satisfied by simpler protocols and is preserved by composition. After that we fix a passive security model and show how to convert a private protocol into a universally compos able protocol. As a result, we obtain modular security proofs without performance penalties.","PeriodicalId":285965,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 27th Computer Security Foundations Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131223568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：