首页 > 最新文献

World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES最新文献

英文 中文
The uniportal VATS in the treatment of stage II pleural empyema: a safe and effective approach for adults and elderly patients-a single-center experience and literature review. 单中心经验和文献综述:单门户VATS治疗II期胸膜脓肿:一种安全有效的成人和老年患者方法。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00438-8
Claudio Luciani, Andrea Scacchi, Roberto Vaschetti, Giancarlo Di Marzo, Ilaria Fatica, Micaela Cappuccio, Germano Guerra, Graziano Ceccarelli, Pasquale Avella, Aldo Rocca

Background: Pleural empyema (PE) is a frequent disease, associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Surgical approach is the standard of care for most patients with II-III stage PE. In the last years, the minimally invasive surgical revolution involved also thoracic surgery allowing the same outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness combined to better pain management and early discharge. The aim of this study is to demonstrate through our experience on uniportal-video-assisted thoracoscopy (u-VATS) the effectiveness and safety of its approach in treatment of stage II PE. As secondary endpoint, we will evaluate the different pattern of indication of u-VATS in adult and elderly patients with literature review.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected database of u-VATS procedures from November 2018 to February 2022, in our regional referral center for Thoracic Surgery of Regione Molise General Surgery Unit of "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, in Campobasso, Molise, Italy.

Results: A total of 29 patients underwent u-VATS for II stage PE. Fifteen (51.72%) patients were younger than 70 years old, identified as "adults," 14 (48.28%) patients were older than 70 years old, identified as "elderly." No mortality was found. Mean operative time was 104.68 ± 39.01 min in the total population. The elderly group showed a longer operative time (115 ± 53.15 min) (p = 0.369). Chest tube was removed earlier in adults than in elderly group (5.56 ± 2.06 vs. 10.14 ± 5.58 p = 0.038). The Length of Stay (LOS) was shorter in the adults group (6.44 ± 2.35 vs. 12.29 ± 6.96 p = 0.033). Patients evaluated through Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale returned to normal activities of daily living after surgery.

Conclusion: In addition, the u-VATS approach seems to be safe and effective ensuring a risk reduction of progression to stage III PE with a lower recurrence risk and septic complications also in elderly patients. Further comparative multicenter analysis are advocated to set the role of u-VATS approach in the treatment of PE in adults and elderly patients.

背景:胸膜脓胸(PE)是一种常见病,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。手术是大多数II-III期PE患者的标准治疗方法。在过去的几年里,微创手术革命也涉及到胸外科手术,在安全性和有效性方面取得了相同的结果,并结合了更好的疼痛管理和早期出院。本研究的目的是通过我们在单门静脉视频辅助胸腔镜(u-VATS)上的经验来证明其治疗II期PE的有效性和安全性。作为次要终点,我们将通过文献综述来评估成人和老年患者u-VATS的不同适应证模式。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了2018年11月至2022年2月在意大利莫利塞坎波巴索“A. Cardarelli”医院莫利塞地区普通外科胸外科区域转诊中心前瞻性收集的u-VATS手术数据库。结果:共有29例患者接受了u-VATS治疗II期PE。年龄小于70岁的15例(51.72%)为“成人”,年龄大于70岁的14例(48.28%)为“老年人”。未发现死亡率。平均手术时间为104.68±39.01 min。老年组手术时间更长(115±53.15 min) (p = 0.369)。成人较老年组更早拔除胸管(5.56±2.06∶10.14±5.58 p = 0.038)。成人组住院时间(LOS)较短(6.44±2.35∶12.29±6.96 p = 0.033)。通过日常生活工具活动(IADL)量表评估的患者术后恢复正常的日常生活活动。结论:此外,u-VATS入路似乎是安全有效的,确保降低进展到III期PE的风险,同时降低了老年患者的复发风险和脓毒性并发症。我们提倡进一步的多中心对比分析,以确定u-VATS入路在成人和老年PE患者治疗中的作用。
{"title":"The uniportal VATS in the treatment of stage II pleural empyema: a safe and effective approach for adults and elderly patients-a single-center experience and literature review.","authors":"Claudio Luciani,&nbsp;Andrea Scacchi,&nbsp;Roberto Vaschetti,&nbsp;Giancarlo Di Marzo,&nbsp;Ilaria Fatica,&nbsp;Micaela Cappuccio,&nbsp;Germano Guerra,&nbsp;Graziano Ceccarelli,&nbsp;Pasquale Avella,&nbsp;Aldo Rocca","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00438-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00438-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pleural empyema (PE) is a frequent disease, associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Surgical approach is the standard of care for most patients with II-III stage PE. In the last years, the minimally invasive surgical revolution involved also thoracic surgery allowing the same outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness combined to better pain management and early discharge. The aim of this study is to demonstrate through our experience on uniportal-video-assisted thoracoscopy (u-VATS) the effectiveness and safety of its approach in treatment of stage II PE. As secondary endpoint, we will evaluate the different pattern of indication of u-VATS in adult and elderly patients with literature review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected database of u-VATS procedures from November 2018 to February 2022, in our regional referral center for Thoracic Surgery of Regione Molise General Surgery Unit of \"A. Cardarelli\" Hospital, in Campobasso, Molise, Italy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 patients underwent u-VATS for II stage PE. Fifteen (51.72%) patients were younger than 70 years old, identified as \"adults,\" 14 (48.28%) patients were older than 70 years old, identified as \"elderly.\" No mortality was found. Mean operative time was 104.68 ± 39.01 min in the total population. The elderly group showed a longer operative time (115 ± 53.15 min) (p = 0.369). Chest tube was removed earlier in adults than in elderly group (5.56 ± 2.06 vs. 10.14 ± 5.58 p = 0.038). The Length of Stay (LOS) was shorter in the adults group (6.44 ± 2.35 vs. 12.29 ± 6.96 p = 0.033). Patients evaluated through Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale returned to normal activities of daily living after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition, the u-VATS approach seems to be safe and effective ensuring a risk reduction of progression to stage III PE with a lower recurrence risk and septic complications also in elderly patients. Further comparative multicenter analysis are advocated to set the role of u-VATS approach in the treatment of PE in adults and elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9423701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33446414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Correction: Minimally invasive surgery in emergency surgery: a WSES survey. 纠正:急诊手术中的微创手术:一项WSES调查。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00451-x
Marco Ceresoli, Michele Pisano, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Niccolò Allievi, Kurinchi Gurusamy, Walt L Biffl, Giovanni D Tebala, Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni, Massimo Sartelli, Yoram Kluger, Gianluca Baiocchi, Federico Coccolini
{"title":"Correction: Minimally invasive surgery in emergency surgery: a WSES survey.","authors":"Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Michele Pisano,&nbsp;Fikri Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Niccolò Allievi,&nbsp;Kurinchi Gurusamy,&nbsp;Walt L Biffl,&nbsp;Giovanni D Tebala,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Gianluca Baiocchi,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00451-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00451-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9422089/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33446583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diversity and ethics in trauma and acute care surgery teams: results from an international survey. 创伤和急症护理外科团队的多样性和伦理:一项国际调查的结果。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00446-8
Lorenzo Cobianchi, Francesca Dal Mas, Maurizio Massaro, Walter Biffl, Fausto Catena, Federico Coccolini, Beatrice Dionigi, Paolo Dionigi, Salomone Di Saverio, Paola Fugazzola, Yoram Kluger, Ari Leppäniemi, Ernest E Moore, Massimo Sartelli, George Velmahos, Sarah Woltz, Peter Angelos, Luca Ansaloni

Background: Investigating the context of trauma and acute care surgery, the article aims at understanding the factors that can enhance some ethical aspects, namely the importance of patient consent, the perceptiveness of the ethical role of the trauma leader, and the perceived importance of ethics as an educational subject.

Methods: The article employs an international questionnaire promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery.

Results: Through the analysis of 402 fully filled questionnaires by surgeons from 72 different countries, the three main ethical topics are investigated through the lens of gender, membership of an academic or non-academic institution, an official trauma team, and a diverse group. In general terms, results highlight greater attention paid by surgeons belonging to academic institutions, official trauma teams, and diverse groups.

Conclusions: Our results underline that some organizational factors (e.g., the fact that the team belongs to a university context or is more diverse) might lead to the development of a higher sensibility on ethical matters. Embracing cultural diversity forces trauma teams to deal with different mindsets. Organizations should, therefore, consider those elements in defining their organizational procedures.

Level of evidence: Trauma and acute care teams work under tremendous pressure and complex circumstances, with their members needing to make ethical decisions quickly. The international survey allowed to shed light on how team assembly decisions might represent an opportunity to coordinate team member actions and increase performance.

背景:调查创伤和急症护理外科的背景,本文旨在了解可以提高某些伦理方面的因素,即患者同意的重要性,对创伤领导者伦理角色的感知,以及对伦理作为教育主题的重要性的感知。方法:采用世界急诊外科学会推广的国际调查问卷。结果:通过对来自72个不同国家的402份完整填写的外科医生问卷的分析,通过性别、学术或非学术机构的成员、官方创伤团队和多元化群体的视角调查了三个主要的伦理主题。总的来说,研究结果表明,来自学术机构、官方创伤团队和不同群体的外科医生给予了更多的关注。结论:我们的结果强调了一些组织因素(例如,团队属于大学背景或更多样化的事实)可能导致对道德问题的更高敏感性的发展。拥抱文化多样性迫使创伤团队处理不同的心态。因此,各组织在确定其组织程序时应考虑到这些因素。证据水平:创伤和急性护理团队在巨大的压力和复杂的环境下工作,他们的成员需要迅速做出道德决定。这项国际调查揭示了团队集合决策如何代表了协调团队成员行动和提高绩效的机会。
{"title":"Diversity and ethics in trauma and acute care surgery teams: results from an international survey.","authors":"Lorenzo Cobianchi,&nbsp;Francesca Dal Mas,&nbsp;Maurizio Massaro,&nbsp;Walter Biffl,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Beatrice Dionigi,&nbsp;Paolo Dionigi,&nbsp;Salomone Di Saverio,&nbsp;Paola Fugazzola,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Ari Leppäniemi,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;George Velmahos,&nbsp;Sarah Woltz,&nbsp;Peter Angelos,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00446-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00446-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Investigating the context of trauma and acute care surgery, the article aims at understanding the factors that can enhance some ethical aspects, namely the importance of patient consent, the perceptiveness of the ethical role of the trauma leader, and the perceived importance of ethics as an educational subject.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The article employs an international questionnaire promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the analysis of 402 fully filled questionnaires by surgeons from 72 different countries, the three main ethical topics are investigated through the lens of gender, membership of an academic or non-academic institution, an official trauma team, and a diverse group. In general terms, results highlight greater attention paid by surgeons belonging to academic institutions, official trauma teams, and diverse groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results underline that some organizational factors (e.g., the fact that the team belongs to a university context or is more diverse) might lead to the development of a higher sensibility on ethical matters. Embracing cultural diversity forces trauma teams to deal with different mindsets. Organizations should, therefore, consider those elements in defining their organizational procedures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Trauma and acute care teams work under tremendous pressure and complex circumstances, with their members needing to make ethical decisions quickly. The international survey allowed to shed light on how team assembly decisions might represent an opportunity to coordinate team member actions and increase performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9364511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40708033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Outcome of necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene with and without hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a retrospective analysis over 10 years. 高压氧治疗和不高压氧治疗坏死性筋膜炎和富尼耶坏疽的预后:10年的回顾性分析。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00448-6
Assen Mladenov, Katharina Diehl, Oliver Müller, Christian von Heymann, Susanne Kopp, Wiebke K Peitsch

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) require immediate radical debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotics and intensive care. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be performed adjunctively, but unequivocal evidence for its benefits is still lacking.

Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center study including 192 patients with necrotizing fasciitis or Fournier's gangrene to assess in-hospital mortality and outcome dependent on patient, disease and treatment characteristics with or without HBOT.

Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 27.6%. Factors associated with increased mortality according to multivariate analysis were higher age, affection of multiple or problem localizations (odds ratio (OR) = 2.88, P = 0.003), ineligibility for HBOT despite clinical indication (OR = 8.59, P = 0.005), pathogens in blood cultures (OR = 3.36, P = 0.002), complications (OR = 10.35, P < 0.001) and sepsis/organ dysfunction (OR = 19.58, P < 0.001). Factors associated with better survival included vacuum-assisted wound closure (OR = 0.17, P < 0.001), larger number of debridements (OR = 0.83, P < 0.001) and defect closure with mesh graft (OR = 0.06, P < 0.001) or flap (OR = 0.09, P = 0.024). When participants were stratified into subgroups without requirement of HBOT (n = 98), treated with HBOT (n = 83) and ineligible for HBOT due to contraindications (n = 11), the first two groups had similar survival rates (75.5% vs. 73.5%) and comparable outcome, although patients with HBOT suffered from more severe NSTI, reflected by more frequent affection of multiple localizations (P < 0.001), sepsis at admission (P < 0.001) and intensive care treatment (P < 0.001), more debridements (P < 0.001) and a larger number of antibiotics (P = 0.001). In the subgroup ineligible for HBOT, survival was significantly worse (36.4%, P = 0.022).

Conclusion: These results point to a benefit from HBOT for treatment of NSTI in critically ill patients.

背景:坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)需要立即彻底清创,广谱抗生素和重症监护。高压氧治疗(HBOT)可作为辅助治疗,但其益处仍缺乏明确的证据。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性单中心研究,包括192例坏死性筋膜炎或富尼耶坏疽患者,以评估住院死亡率和结果取决于患者、疾病和治疗特征,有无HBOT。结果:住院死亡率为27.6%。多因素分析显示,与死亡率增加相关的因素有年龄较大、多部位或问题定位的影响(比值比(or) = 2.88, P = 0.003)、尽管有临床指征但不适合使用HBOT (or = 8.59, P = 0.005)、血培养病原体(or = 3.36, P = 0.002)、并发症(or = 10.35, P)。结论:这些结果表明HBOT治疗危重患者NSTI有益处。
{"title":"Outcome of necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene with and without hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a retrospective analysis over 10 years.","authors":"Assen Mladenov,&nbsp;Katharina Diehl,&nbsp;Oliver Müller,&nbsp;Christian von Heymann,&nbsp;Susanne Kopp,&nbsp;Wiebke K Peitsch","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00448-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00448-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) require immediate radical debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotics and intensive care. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be performed adjunctively, but unequivocal evidence for its benefits is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective single-center study including 192 patients with necrotizing fasciitis or Fournier's gangrene to assess in-hospital mortality and outcome dependent on patient, disease and treatment characteristics with or without HBOT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in-hospital mortality rate was 27.6%. Factors associated with increased mortality according to multivariate analysis were higher age, affection of multiple or problem localizations (odds ratio (OR) = 2.88, P = 0.003), ineligibility for HBOT despite clinical indication (OR = 8.59, P = 0.005), pathogens in blood cultures (OR = 3.36, P = 0.002), complications (OR = 10.35, P < 0.001) and sepsis/organ dysfunction (OR = 19.58, P < 0.001). Factors associated with better survival included vacuum-assisted wound closure (OR = 0.17, P < 0.001), larger number of debridements (OR = 0.83, P < 0.001) and defect closure with mesh graft (OR = 0.06, P < 0.001) or flap (OR = 0.09, P = 0.024). When participants were stratified into subgroups without requirement of HBOT (n = 98), treated with HBOT (n = 83) and ineligible for HBOT due to contraindications (n = 11), the first two groups had similar survival rates (75.5% vs. 73.5%) and comparable outcome, although patients with HBOT suffered from more severe NSTI, reflected by more frequent affection of multiple localizations (P < 0.001), sepsis at admission (P < 0.001) and intensive care treatment (P < 0.001), more debridements (P < 0.001) and a larger number of antibiotics (P = 0.001). In the subgroup ineligible for HBOT, survival was significantly worse (36.4%, P = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results point to a benefit from HBOT for treatment of NSTI in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40585228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Machine learning-based prediction of emergency neurosurgery within 24 h after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. 基于机器学习的中重度创伤性脑损伤后24小时内急诊神经外科手术预测
Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00449-5
Jean-Denis Moyer, Patrick Lee, Charles Bernard, Lois Henry, Elodie Lang, Fabrice Cook, Fanny Planquart, Mathieu Boutonnet, Anatole Harrois, Tobias Gauss

Background: Rapid referral of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients requiring emergency neurosurgery to a specialized trauma center can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, no model has been reported to predict the need for acute neurosurgery in severe to moderate TBI patients. This study aims to evaluate the performance of Machine Learning-based models to establish to predict the need for neurosurgery procedure within 24 h after moderate to severe TBI.

Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study using data from a national trauma registry (Traumabase®) from November 2011 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria correspond to patients over 18 years old with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow coma score ≤ 12) during prehospital assessment. Patients who died within the first 24 h after hospital admission and secondary transfers were excluded. The population was divided into a train set (80% of patients) and a test set (20% of patients). Several approaches were used to define the best prognostic model (linear nearest neighbor or ensemble model). The Shapley Value was used to identify the most relevant pre-hospital variables for prediction.

Results: 2159 patients were included in the study. 914 patients (42%) required neurosurgical intervention within 24 h. The population was predominantly male (77%), young (median age 35 years [IQR 24-52]) with severe head injury (median GCS 6 [3-9]). Based on the evaluation of the predictive model on the test set, the logistic regression model had an AUC of 0.76. The best predictive model was obtained with the CatBoost technique (AUC 0.81). According to the Shapley values method, the most predictive variables in the CatBoost were a low initial Glasgow coma score, the regression of pupillary abnormality after osmotherapy, a high blood pressure and a low heart rate.

Conclusion: Machine learning-based models could predict the need for emergency neurosurgery within 24 h after moderate and severe head injury. Potential clinical benefits of such models as a decision-making tool deserve further assessment. The performance in real-life setting and the impact on clinical decision-making of the model requires workflow integration and prospective assessment.

背景:需要紧急神经外科手术的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者快速转诊到专门的创伤中心可以显著降低发病率和死亡率。目前,尚无模型预测重型至中度TBI患者是否需要进行急性神经外科手术。本研究旨在评估基于机器学习的模型的性能,以建立预测中度至重度TBI后24小时内需要进行神经外科手术的模型。方法:回顾性多中心队列研究,使用2011年11月至2020年12月来自国家创伤登记处(创伤数据库®)的数据。纳入标准对应于院前评估的18岁以上中度或重度TBI患者(格拉斯哥昏迷评分≤12)。排除入院后24小时内死亡和二次转院的患者。人群被分为列车集(80%的患者)和测试集(20%的患者)。我们使用了几种方法来定义最佳预测模型(线性最近邻模型或集合模型)。Shapley值用于识别与预测最相关的院前变量。结果:2159例患者纳入研究。914例(42%)患者在24小时内需要神经外科干预。患者主要为男性(77%),年轻(中位年龄35岁[IQR 24-52]),严重颅脑损伤(中位GCS 6[3-9])。根据预测模型在测试集上的评价,逻辑回归模型的AUC为0.76。CatBoost技术预测模型最佳,AUC为0.81。根据Shapley值法,CatBoost中最具预测性的变量是低初始格拉斯哥昏迷评分、渗透治疗后瞳孔异常的回归、高血压和低心率。结论:基于机器学习的模型可以预测中重度颅脑损伤后24 h内是否需要紧急神经外科手术。这些模型作为决策工具的潜在临床效益值得进一步评估。该模型在现实环境中的表现和对临床决策的影响需要工作流集成和前瞻性评估。
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of emergency neurosurgery within 24 h after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Jean-Denis Moyer, Patrick Lee, Charles Bernard, Lois Henry, Elodie Lang, Fabrice Cook, Fanny Planquart, Mathieu Boutonnet, Anatole Harrois, Tobias Gauss","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00449-5","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s13017-022-00449-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid referral of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients requiring emergency neurosurgery to a specialized trauma center can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, no model has been reported to predict the need for acute neurosurgery in severe to moderate TBI patients. This study aims to evaluate the performance of Machine Learning-based models to establish to predict the need for neurosurgery procedure within 24 h after moderate to severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective multicenter cohort study using data from a national trauma registry (Traumabase®) from November 2011 to December 2020. Inclusion criteria correspond to patients over 18 years old with moderate or severe TBI (Glasgow coma score ≤ 12) during prehospital assessment. Patients who died within the first 24 h after hospital admission and secondary transfers were excluded. The population was divided into a train set (80% of patients) and a test set (20% of patients). Several approaches were used to define the best prognostic model (linear nearest neighbor or ensemble model). The Shapley Value was used to identify the most relevant pre-hospital variables for prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2159 patients were included in the study. 914 patients (42%) required neurosurgical intervention within 24 h. The population was predominantly male (77%), young (median age 35 years [IQR 24-52]) with severe head injury (median GCS 6 [3-9]). Based on the evaluation of the predictive model on the test set, the logistic regression model had an AUC of 0.76. The best predictive model was obtained with the CatBoost technique (AUC 0.81). According to the Shapley values method, the most predictive variables in the CatBoost were a low initial Glasgow coma score, the regression of pupillary abnormality after osmotherapy, a high blood pressure and a low heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning-based models could predict the need for emergency neurosurgery within 24 h after moderate and severe head injury. Potential clinical benefits of such models as a decision-making tool deserve further assessment. The performance in real-life setting and the impact on clinical decision-making of the model requires workflow integration and prospective assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351267/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40689954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The LIFE TRIAD of emergency general surgery. 紧急普通外科的生命三位一体。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00447-7
Federico Coccolini, Massimo Sartelli, Yoram Kluger, Aleksei Osipov, Yunfeng Cui, Solomon Gurmu Beka, Andrew Kirkpatrick, Ibrahima Sall, Ernest E Moore, Walter L Biffl, Andrey Litvin, Michele Pisano, Stefano Magnone, Edoardo Picetti, Nicola de Angelis, Philip Stahel, Luca Ansaloni, Edward Tan, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Marco Ceresoli, Andreas Hecker, Osvaldo Chiara, Gabriele Sganga, Vladimir Khokha, Salomone di Saverio, Boris Sakakushev, Giampiero Campanelli, Gustavo Fraga, Imtiaz Wani, Richard Ten Broek, Enrico Cicuttin, Camilla Cremonini, Dario Tartaglia, Kjetil Soreide, Joseph Galante, Marc de Moya, Kaoru Koike, Belinda De Simone, Zsolt Balogh, Francesco Amico, Vishal Shelat, Emmanouil Pikoulis, Isidoro Di Carlo, Luigi Bonavina, Ari Leppaniemi, Ingo Marzi, Rao Ivatury, Jim Khan, Ronald V Maier, Timothy C Hardcastle, Arda Isik, Mauro Podda, Matti Tolonen, Kemal Rasa, Pradeep H Navsaria, Zaza Demetrashvili, Antonio Tarasconi, Paolo Carcoforo, Maria Grazia Sibilla, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Nikolaos Pararas, Dieter Weber, Massimo Chiarugi, Fausto Catena

Emergency General Surgery (EGS) was identified as multidisciplinary surgery performed for traumatic and non-traumatic acute conditions during the same admission in the hospital by general emergency surgeons and other specialists. It is the most diffused surgical discipline in the world. To live and grow strong EGS necessitates three fundamental parts: emergency and elective continuous surgical practice, evidence generation through clinical registries and data accrual, and indications and guidelines production: the LIFE TRIAD.

急诊普通外科(EGS)被确定为在同一住院期间由普通急诊外科医生和其他专家为创伤性和非创伤性急性病进行的多学科外科手术。它是世界上最广泛的外科学科。生存和发展强大的EGS需要三个基本部分:急诊和选择性连续手术实践,通过临床登记和数据积累产生证据,以及适应症和指南的制定:LIFE TRIAD。
{"title":"The LIFE TRIAD of emergency general surgery.","authors":"Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Yoram Kluger,&nbsp;Aleksei Osipov,&nbsp;Yunfeng Cui,&nbsp;Solomon Gurmu Beka,&nbsp;Andrew Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Ibrahima Sall,&nbsp;Ernest E Moore,&nbsp;Walter L Biffl,&nbsp;Andrey Litvin,&nbsp;Michele Pisano,&nbsp;Stefano Magnone,&nbsp;Edoardo Picetti,&nbsp;Nicola de Angelis,&nbsp;Philip Stahel,&nbsp;Luca Ansaloni,&nbsp;Edward Tan,&nbsp;Fikri Abu-Zidan,&nbsp;Marco Ceresoli,&nbsp;Andreas Hecker,&nbsp;Osvaldo Chiara,&nbsp;Gabriele Sganga,&nbsp;Vladimir Khokha,&nbsp;Salomone di Saverio,&nbsp;Boris Sakakushev,&nbsp;Giampiero Campanelli,&nbsp;Gustavo Fraga,&nbsp;Imtiaz Wani,&nbsp;Richard Ten Broek,&nbsp;Enrico Cicuttin,&nbsp;Camilla Cremonini,&nbsp;Dario Tartaglia,&nbsp;Kjetil Soreide,&nbsp;Joseph Galante,&nbsp;Marc de Moya,&nbsp;Kaoru Koike,&nbsp;Belinda De Simone,&nbsp;Zsolt Balogh,&nbsp;Francesco Amico,&nbsp;Vishal Shelat,&nbsp;Emmanouil Pikoulis,&nbsp;Isidoro Di Carlo,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina,&nbsp;Ari Leppaniemi,&nbsp;Ingo Marzi,&nbsp;Rao Ivatury,&nbsp;Jim Khan,&nbsp;Ronald V Maier,&nbsp;Timothy C Hardcastle,&nbsp;Arda Isik,&nbsp;Mauro Podda,&nbsp;Matti Tolonen,&nbsp;Kemal Rasa,&nbsp;Pradeep H Navsaria,&nbsp;Zaza Demetrashvili,&nbsp;Antonio Tarasconi,&nbsp;Paolo Carcoforo,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Sibilla,&nbsp;Gian Luca Baiocchi,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pararas,&nbsp;Dieter Weber,&nbsp;Massimo Chiarugi,&nbsp;Fausto Catena","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00447-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00447-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emergency General Surgery (EGS) was identified as multidisciplinary surgery performed for traumatic and non-traumatic acute conditions during the same admission in the hospital by general emergency surgeons and other specialists. It is the most diffused surgical discipline in the world. To live and grow strong EGS necessitates three fundamental parts: emergency and elective continuous surgical practice, evidence generation through clinical registries and data accrual, and indications and guidelines production: the LIFE TRIAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9317062/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40539646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Correction to: Two years later: Is the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still having an impact on emergency surgery? An international cross-sectional survey among WSES members. 更正:两年后:SARS-CoV-2大流行是否仍对急诊手术产生影响?在WSES成员中进行的国际横断面调查。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00442-y
Martin Reichert, Massimo Sartelli, Markus A Weigand, Matthias Hecker, Philip U Oppelt, Julia Noll, Ingolf H Askevold, Juliane Liese, Winfried Padberg, Federico Coccolini, Fausto Catena, Andreas Hecker
{"title":"Correction to: Two years later: Is the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still having an impact on emergency surgery? An international cross-sectional survey among WSES members.","authors":"Martin Reichert,&nbsp;Massimo Sartelli,&nbsp;Markus A Weigand,&nbsp;Matthias Hecker,&nbsp;Philip U Oppelt,&nbsp;Julia Noll,&nbsp;Ingolf H Askevold,&nbsp;Juliane Liese,&nbsp;Winfried Padberg,&nbsp;Federico Coccolini,&nbsp;Fausto Catena,&nbsp;Andreas Hecker","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00442-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00442-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9270731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40596784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre. 单纯钝性肾损伤是否需要重复CT扫描?大容量泌尿创伤中心的经验。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00445-9
Andrea Katharina Lindner, Anna Katharina Luger, Josef Fritz, Johannes Stäblein, Christian Radmayr, Friedrich Aigner, Peter Rehder, Gennadi Tulchiner, Wolfgang Horninger, Renate Pichler

Background: Current guidelines recommend repeat computed tomography (CT) imaging in high-grade blunt renal injury within 48-96 h, yet diagnostic value and clinical significance remain controversial. The aim of this work was to determine the possible gain of CT re-imaging in uncomplicated patients with blunt renal trauma at 48 h after injury, presenting one of the largest case series.

Methods: A retrospective database of patients admitted to our centre with isolated blunt renal trauma due to sporting injuries was analysed for a period of 20 years (2000-2020). We included only patients who underwent repeat imaging at 48 h after trauma irrespective of AAST renal injury grading (grade 1-5) and initial management. The primary outcome was intervention rates after CT imaging at 48 h in uncomplicated patients versus CT scan at the time of clinical symptoms.

Results: A total of 280 patients (mean age: 37.8 years; 244 (87.1%) male) with repeat CT after 48 h were included. 150 (53.6%) patients were classified as low-grade (grade 1-3) and 130 (46.4%) as high-grade (grade 4-5) trauma. Immediate intervention at trauma was necessary in 59 (21.1%) patients with high-grade injuries: minimally invasive therapy in 48 (81.4%) and open surgery in 11 (18.6%) patients, respectively. In only 16 (5.7%) cases, intervention was performed based on CT re-imaging at 48 h (low-grade vs. high-grade: 3.3% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.075). On the contrary, intervention rate due to clinical symptoms was 12.5% (n = 35). Onset of clinical progress was on average (range) 5.3 (1-17) days post trauma. High-grade trauma (odds ratio [OR]grade 4 vs. grade 3, 14.62; p < 0.001; ORgrade 5 vs. grade 3, 22.88, p = 0.004) and intervention performed at the day of trauma (OR 3.22; p = 0.014) were powerful predictors of occurrence of clinical progress.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that routine CT imaging 48 h post trauma can be safely omitted for patients with low- and high-grade blunt renal injury as long as they remain clinically stable. Patients with high-grade renal injury have the highest risk for clinical progress; thus, close surveillance should be considered especially in this group.

背景:目前的指南建议在高度钝性肾损伤48-96小时内重复CT成像,但诊断价值和临床意义仍存在争议。本研究的目的是确定钝性肾外伤患者在损伤后48小时进行CT重新成像的可能获益,并提出了最大的病例系列之一。方法:回顾性分析我院20年来(2000-2020年)因运动损伤引起的孤立性钝性肾损伤患者的数据库。我们只纳入了创伤后48小时进行重复影像学检查的患者,而不考虑AAST肾损伤分级(1-5级)和初始处理。主要结果是无并发症患者48小时CT成像后的干预率与出现临床症状时CT扫描的干预率。结果:共280例患者,平均年龄37.8岁;244例(87.1%)男性,48 h后复查CT。150例(53.6%)患者为低级别(1-3级)创伤,130例(46.4%)患者为高级别(4-5级)创伤。59例(21.1%)高级别损伤患者需要立即进行创伤干预,48例(81.4%)患者需要微创治疗,11例(18.6%)患者需要开放手术。只有16例(5.7%)病例在48小时进行了基于CT重新成像的干预(低分级vs高分级:3.3% vs 8.5%;p = 0.075)。相反,临床症状干预率为12.5% (n = 35)。平均(范围)创伤后5.3(1-17)天出现临床进展。高度创伤(优势比[OR] 4级对3级,14.62;p 5级对3级,22.88,p = 0.004)和在创伤当天进行干预(OR 3.22;P = 0.014)是临床进展发生的有力预测因子。结论:我们的数据表明,只要患者保持临床稳定,低级别和高级别钝性肾损伤患者创伤后48小时的常规CT成像可以安全省略。重度肾损伤患者出现临床进展的风险最高;因此,应特别考虑对这一群体进行密切监测。
{"title":"Do we need repeated CT imaging in uncomplicated blunt renal injuries? Experiences of a high-volume urological trauma centre.","authors":"Andrea Katharina Lindner,&nbsp;Anna Katharina Luger,&nbsp;Josef Fritz,&nbsp;Johannes Stäblein,&nbsp;Christian Radmayr,&nbsp;Friedrich Aigner,&nbsp;Peter Rehder,&nbsp;Gennadi Tulchiner,&nbsp;Wolfgang Horninger,&nbsp;Renate Pichler","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00445-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00445-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines recommend repeat computed tomography (CT) imaging in high-grade blunt renal injury within 48-96 h, yet diagnostic value and clinical significance remain controversial. The aim of this work was to determine the possible gain of CT re-imaging in uncomplicated patients with blunt renal trauma at 48 h after injury, presenting one of the largest case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective database of patients admitted to our centre with isolated blunt renal trauma due to sporting injuries was analysed for a period of 20 years (2000-2020). We included only patients who underwent repeat imaging at 48 h after trauma irrespective of AAST renal injury grading (grade 1-5) and initial management. The primary outcome was intervention rates after CT imaging at 48 h in uncomplicated patients versus CT scan at the time of clinical symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 280 patients (mean age: 37.8 years; 244 (87.1%) male) with repeat CT after 48 h were included. 150 (53.6%) patients were classified as low-grade (grade 1-3) and 130 (46.4%) as high-grade (grade 4-5) trauma. Immediate intervention at trauma was necessary in 59 (21.1%) patients with high-grade injuries: minimally invasive therapy in 48 (81.4%) and open surgery in 11 (18.6%) patients, respectively. In only 16 (5.7%) cases, intervention was performed based on CT re-imaging at 48 h (low-grade vs. high-grade: 3.3% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.075). On the contrary, intervention rate due to clinical symptoms was 12.5% (n = 35). Onset of clinical progress was on average (range) 5.3 (1-17) days post trauma. High-grade trauma (odds ratio [OR]<sub>grade 4 vs. grade 3</sub>, 14.62; p < 0.001; OR<sub>grade 5 vs. grade 3</sub>, 22.88, p = 0.004) and intervention performed at the day of trauma (OR 3.22; p = 0.014) were powerful predictors of occurrence of clinical progress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that routine CT imaging 48 h post trauma can be safely omitted for patients with low- and high-grade blunt renal injury as long as they remain clinically stable. Patients with high-grade renal injury have the highest risk for clinical progress; thus, close surveillance should be considered especially in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264658/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40592739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Effect of sarcopenia in predicting postoperative mortality in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 肌肉减少症在预测急诊剖腹手术术后死亡率中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-06-25 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00440-0
Tao-Ran Yang, Kai Luo, Xiao Deng, Le Xu, Ru-Rong Wang, Peng Ji

Background: While emergency laparotomy has been associated with high rates of postoperative mortality and adverse events, preoperative systematic evaluation of patients may improve perioperative outcomes. However, due to the critical condition of the patient and the limited operation time, it is challenging to conduct a comprehensive evaluation. In recent years, sarcopenia is considered a health problem associated with an increased incidence of poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sarcopenia on 30-day mortality and postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Methods: We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for all studies comparing emergency laparotomy in patients with and without sarcopenia up to March 1, 2022. The primary outcome was of 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, the incidence of adverse events, number of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and ICU length of stay. Study and outcome-specific risk of bias were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).

Result: A total of 11 eligible studies were included in this study. The results showed that patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of death 30 days after surgery (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.93-3.05, P < 0.00001). More patients were admitted to ICU after surgery (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.11-2.25, P = 0.01). Both the ICU length of stay (MD = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.05-1.06, P = 0.03) and hospital length of stay (MD = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.33-3.32, P < 0.00001) were longer in the sarcopenia group. The incidence of postoperative complications was also significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.41-2.26, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion: In emergency laparotomy, sarcopenia was associated with increased 30-day postoperative mortality. Both the lengths of stay in the ICU and the total length of hospital stay were significantly higher than those in non-sarcopenic patients. Therefore, we concluded that sarcopenia can be used as a tool to identify preoperative high-risk patients, which can be considered to develop new postoperative risk prediction models. Registration number Registered on Prospero with the registration number of CRD42022300132.

背景:虽然急诊剖腹手术与术后高死亡率和不良事件相关,但术前系统评估患者可能会改善围手术期预后。但由于患者病情危重,手术时间有限,很难对其进行全面的评估。近年来,肌肉减少症被认为是一种与预后不良发生率增加相关的健康问题。本研究旨在探讨肌肉减少症对急诊剖腹手术患者30天死亡率和术后不良事件的影响。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane等数据库,检索截至2022年3月1日,所有比较有和没有肌肉减少症患者急诊剖腹手术的研究。主要终点为术后30天死亡率。次要结局是住院时间、不良事件发生率、术后重症监护病房(ICU)入院次数和ICU住院时间。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估研究和结果特异性偏倚风险。我们使用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行评级。结果:本研究共纳入11项符合条件的研究。结果显示,肌少症患者术后30天死亡风险较高(OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.93-3.05, P)。结论:急诊剖腹手术中,肌少症与术后30天死亡率升高相关。ICU住院时间和总住院时间均明显高于非肌少症患者。因此,我们认为肌少症可作为识别术前高危患者的工具,可考虑开发新的术后风险预测模型。注册号在普洛斯彼罗注册,注册号为CRD42022300132。
{"title":"Effect of sarcopenia in predicting postoperative mortality in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tao-Ran Yang,&nbsp;Kai Luo,&nbsp;Xiao Deng,&nbsp;Le Xu,&nbsp;Ru-Rong Wang,&nbsp;Peng Ji","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00440-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00440-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While emergency laparotomy has been associated with high rates of postoperative mortality and adverse events, preoperative systematic evaluation of patients may improve perioperative outcomes. However, due to the critical condition of the patient and the limited operation time, it is challenging to conduct a comprehensive evaluation. In recent years, sarcopenia is considered a health problem associated with an increased incidence of poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the effect of sarcopenia on 30-day mortality and postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for all studies comparing emergency laparotomy in patients with and without sarcopenia up to March 1, 2022. The primary outcome was of 30-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, the incidence of adverse events, number of postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and ICU length of stay. Study and outcome-specific risk of bias were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We rated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 11 eligible studies were included in this study. The results showed that patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of death 30 days after surgery (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.93-3.05, P < 0.00001). More patients were admitted to ICU after surgery (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.11-2.25, P = 0.01). Both the ICU length of stay (MD = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.05-1.06, P = 0.03) and hospital length of stay (MD = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.33-3.32, P < 0.00001) were longer in the sarcopenia group. The incidence of postoperative complications was also significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.41-2.26, P < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In emergency laparotomy, sarcopenia was associated with increased 30-day postoperative mortality. Both the lengths of stay in the ICU and the total length of hospital stay were significantly higher than those in non-sarcopenic patients. Therefore, we concluded that sarcopenia can be used as a tool to identify preoperative high-risk patients, which can be considered to develop new postoperative risk prediction models. Registration number Registered on Prospero with the registration number of CRD42022300132.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9233792/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40399362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Penetrating renal injuries: an observational study of non-operative management and the impact of opening Gerota's fascia. 穿透性肾损伤:非手术治疗及打开Gerota筋膜影响的观察研究。
IF 8 Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00439-7
Thomas W Clements, Chad G Ball, Andrew J Nicol, Sorin Edu, Andrew W Kirkpatrick, Pradeep Navsaria

Background: Non-operative management has become increasingly popular in the treatment of renal trauma. While data are robust in blunt mechanisms, the role of non-operative management in penetrating trauma is less clear. Additionally, there is a paucity of data comparing gunshot and stab wounds.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted to a high-volume level 1 trauma center (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town) with penetrating abdominal trauma was performed. Patients with renal injuries were identified and compared based on mechanism [gunshot (GSW) vs. stab] and management strategy (operative vs. non-operative). Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and failure of non-operative management. Secondary outcomes of interest were nephrectomy rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rate, hospital length of stay, and overall morbidity rate.

Results: A total of 150 patients with renal injuries were identified (82 GSW, 68 stab). Overall, 55.2% of patients required emergent/urgent laparotomy. GSWs were more likely to cause grade V injury and concurrent intra-abdominal injuries (p > 0.05). The success rate of non-operative management was 91.6% (89.9% GSW, 92.8% stab, p = 0.64). The absence of hematuria on point of care testing demonstrated a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI 96.8-99.2%). All but 1 patient who failed non-operative management had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. Opening of Gerota's fascia resulted in nephrectomy in 55.6% of cases. There were no statistically significant risk factors for failure of non-operative management identified on univariate logistic regression.

Conclusions: NOM of penetrating renal injuries can be safely and effectively instituted in both gunshot and stab wounds with a very low number of patients progressing to laparotomy. Most patients fail NOM for associated injuries. During laparotomy, the opening of Gerota's fascia may lead to increased risk of nephrectomy. Ongoing study with larger populations is required to develop effective predictive models of patients who will fail NOM.

背景:非手术治疗在肾脏创伤的治疗中越来越受欢迎。虽然钝性机制的数据是可靠的,但非手术治疗在穿透性创伤中的作用尚不清楚。此外,比较枪伤和刺伤的数据也很缺乏。方法:回顾性分析在开普敦一家高容量1级创伤中心(Groote Schuur医院)收治的穿透性腹部创伤患者。根据机制[枪击(GSW)与刺伤]和处理策略(手术与非手术)对肾损伤患者进行识别和比较。主要关注的结局是死亡率和非手术治疗的失败。次要结局为肾切除术率、Clavien-Dindo并发症率、住院时间和总发病率。结果:共发现肾损伤患者150例(GSW 82例,刺伤68例)。总体而言,55.2%的患者需要紧急剖腹手术。GSWs更容易造成V级损伤和并发腹内损伤(p > 0.05)。非手术治疗成功率为91.6% (GSW 89.9%, stab 92.8%, p = 0.64)。在护理点检测中没有血尿显示出98.4%的阴性预测值(95% CI 96.8-99.2%)。除1例非手术治疗失败外,其余患者均伴有腹内损伤,需要手术干预。打开Gerota筋膜导致55.6%的病例行肾切除术。单因素logistic回归分析未发现非手术治疗失败的危险因素。结论:穿透性肾损伤的NOM可以安全有效地应用于枪伤和刀伤,且很少有患者进展到剖腹手术。大多数患者因相关损伤而未能实现NOM。剖腹手术时,Gerota筋膜的打开可能导致肾切除术的风险增加。需要在更大的人群中进行持续的研究,以建立有效的预测模型,以预测NOM失败的患者。
{"title":"Penetrating renal injuries: an observational study of non-operative management and the impact of opening Gerota's fascia.","authors":"Thomas W Clements,&nbsp;Chad G Ball,&nbsp;Andrew J Nicol,&nbsp;Sorin Edu,&nbsp;Andrew W Kirkpatrick,&nbsp;Pradeep Navsaria","doi":"10.1186/s13017-022-00439-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00439-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-operative management has become increasingly popular in the treatment of renal trauma. While data are robust in blunt mechanisms, the role of non-operative management in penetrating trauma is less clear. Additionally, there is a paucity of data comparing gunshot and stab wounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients admitted to a high-volume level 1 trauma center (Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town) with penetrating abdominal trauma was performed. Patients with renal injuries were identified and compared based on mechanism [gunshot (GSW) vs. stab] and management strategy (operative vs. non-operative). Primary outcomes of interest were mortality and failure of non-operative management. Secondary outcomes of interest were nephrectomy rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rate, hospital length of stay, and overall morbidity rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients with renal injuries were identified (82 GSW, 68 stab). Overall, 55.2% of patients required emergent/urgent laparotomy. GSWs were more likely to cause grade V injury and concurrent intra-abdominal injuries (p > 0.05). The success rate of non-operative management was 91.6% (89.9% GSW, 92.8% stab, p = 0.64). The absence of hematuria on point of care testing demonstrated a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI 96.8-99.2%). All but 1 patient who failed non-operative management had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. Opening of Gerota's fascia resulted in nephrectomy in 55.6% of cases. There were no statistically significant risk factors for failure of non-operative management identified on univariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NOM of penetrating renal injuries can be safely and effectively instituted in both gunshot and stab wounds with a very low number of patients progressing to laparotomy. Most patients fail NOM for associated injuries. During laparotomy, the opening of Gerota's fascia may lead to increased risk of nephrectomy. Ongoing study with larger populations is required to develop effective predictive models of patients who will fail NOM.</p>","PeriodicalId":290899,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES","volume":" ","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9208135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40105100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
World Journal of Emergency Surgery : WJES
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1