In this paper, the author analyzes the benefits and limitationsof international arbitration in disputes that are subject to intellectual propertyrights. Intellectual property law disputes have special characteristics. In theevent of a dispute with an international element, there is a problem with thejurisdiction of state courts due to the principle of the territoriality of intellectualproperty rights. The titular of the right must initiate court proceedings in allcountries individually, leading to delays in procedures, multiplication of costsand uneven judicial practice. For these reasons, the author analyzes alternativedispute resolution through arbitration to determine whether this method ofdispute resolution is more acceptable to foreign courts.The author particularly pays attention to the WIPO Center for Arbitrationand Mediation as a permanent arbitration institution whose primary activity isthe resolution of disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.
{"title":"BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW DISPUTES","authors":"Njegoslav Jović","doi":"10.7251/god1840151j","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7251/god1840151j","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the author analyzes the benefits and limitationsof international arbitration in disputes that are subject to intellectual propertyrights. Intellectual property law disputes have special characteristics. In theevent of a dispute with an international element, there is a problem with thejurisdiction of state courts due to the principle of the territoriality of intellectualproperty rights. The titular of the right must initiate court proceedings in allcountries individually, leading to delays in procedures, multiplication of costsand uneven judicial practice. For these reasons, the author analyzes alternativedispute resolution through arbitration to determine whether this method ofdispute resolution is more acceptable to foreign courts.The author particularly pays attention to the WIPO Center for Arbitrationand Mediation as a permanent arbitration institution whose primary activity isthe resolution of disputes in the field of intellectual property rights.","PeriodicalId":297582,"journal":{"name":"Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Banja Luci","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125552734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the Republic of Srpska and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the reformof procedural and material regulations related to immovable property and rightsto nanotechnology has been carried out in order to create favorable conditionsfor economic development. There is no economic or any other development,without credit funds marketed by financial institutions (creditors), who in turnrequire an appropriate waiver of a given fund. The most common means ofsecuring a loan is a mortgage that should provide maximum protection in thesecurity phase, and especially in disbursement. Such a mortgage can only beachieved through the constitutive implementation of the principle of enrollment.Enrolled or registrable mortgage, irrespective of the legal base registration(contract, law, court decision or any other decision of the authority organ),provides legal certainty to all legal entities in real estate. In this context, it isespecially significant that the statutory mortgage must be registered in the publicregister of the real estate and thus equated with all other forms of mortgage inaccordance with the prior tempore potior iure principle.
{"title":"LEGAL MORTGAGE MODUS ACQUIRENDI","authors":"R. Jotanović","doi":"10.7251/god1840075j","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7251/god1840075j","url":null,"abstract":"In the Republic of Srpska and Bosnia and Herzegovina, the reformof procedural and material regulations related to immovable property and rightsto nanotechnology has been carried out in order to create favorable conditionsfor economic development. There is no economic or any other development,without credit funds marketed by financial institutions (creditors), who in turnrequire an appropriate waiver of a given fund. The most common means ofsecuring a loan is a mortgage that should provide maximum protection in thesecurity phase, and especially in disbursement. Such a mortgage can only beachieved through the constitutive implementation of the principle of enrollment.Enrolled or registrable mortgage, irrespective of the legal base registration(contract, law, court decision or any other decision of the authority organ),provides legal certainty to all legal entities in real estate. In this context, it isespecially significant that the statutory mortgage must be registered in the publicregister of the real estate and thus equated with all other forms of mortgage inaccordance with the prior tempore potior iure principle.","PeriodicalId":297582,"journal":{"name":"Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Banja Luci","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130020696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Нема повреде права из члана II/3д) Устава Босне и Херцеговине и чла-на 5 Европске конвенције за заштиту људских права и основних слободакада у образложењима оспорених рјешења о одређивању, односно про-дужењу мјере притвора нису изостали разлози и образложења на основупредочених доказа које су редовни судови цијенили у прилог закључкуо постојању основане сумње и нарочитих околности из члана 146 став 1тачка ц) Закона о кривичном поступку Федерације Босне и Херцеговине.
{"title":"ПРАКСА УСТАВНОГ СУДА БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ","authors":"Марина М. Симовић","doi":"10.7251/GPF1404327S","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7251/GPF1404327S","url":null,"abstract":"Нема повреде права из члана II/3д) Устава Босне и Херцеговине и чла-на 5 Европске конвенције за заштиту људских права и основних слободакада у образложењима оспорених рјешења о одређивању, односно про-дужењу мјере притвора нису изостали разлози и образложења на основупредочених доказа које су редовни судови цијенили у прилог закључкуо постојању основане сумње и нарочитих околности из члана 146 став 1тачка ц) Закона о кривичном поступку Федерације Босне и Херцеговине.","PeriodicalId":297582,"journal":{"name":"Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Banja Luci","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123421257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：