Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (cc-TGA) are predisposed to supraventricular tachycardias; however, data regarding the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) remain limited.
Objective
This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of CA for supraventricular tachycardias in patients with cc-TGA.
Methods
This retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluated 29 of 112 cc-TGA patients (26%) who underwent CA. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on surgical history: anatomical repair (n = 10/43, 23%), physiologic repair (n = 14/32, 44%), and no prior surgery (n = 5/37, 14%). Clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were analyzed.
Results
Of the 29 patients who underwent CA, 10 belonged to the anatomical repair group, 14 to the physiologic repair group, and 5 to the non-surgical group. Median age at ablation was significantly lower in the anatomical repair group (25.6 years), compared with physiologic (40.6 years, P = .005) and non-surgical patients (43.8 years, P = .01). The arrhythmia types included intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (n = 20), focal atrial tachycardia (n = 3), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n = 2), and atrial fibrillation (n = 6). Cavomitral isthmus ablation was frequently required across all groups. Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 3 patients required repeat ablation; all experienced new arrhythmia mechanisms distinct from the index procedure.
Conclusion
Supraventricular tachycardia patterns varied by surgical background, but cavomitral isthmus ablation was commonly indicated. CA is a key therapeutic strategy in the long-term rhythm management of cc-TGA patients.
{"title":"Electrophysiological outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardias in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries","authors":"Toshihiro Nakamura MD, PhD , Yoshiaki Kato MD, PhD , Heima Sakaguchi MD, PhD , Kenzaburo Nakajima MD, PhD , Aki Mori MD, PhD , Kenichi Kurosaki MD, PhD , Hideo Ohuchi MD, PhD , Kengo Kusano MD, PhD, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (cc-TGA) are predisposed to supraventricular tachycardias; however, data regarding the outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) remain limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of CA for supraventricular tachycardias in patients with cc-TGA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluated 29 of 112 cc-TGA patients (26%) who underwent CA. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on surgical history: anatomical repair (n = 10/43, 23%), physiologic repair (n = 14/32, 44%), and no prior surgery (n = 5/37, 14%). Clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 29 patients who underwent CA, 10 belonged to the anatomical repair group, 14 to the physiologic repair group, and 5 to the non-surgical group. Median age at ablation was significantly lower in the anatomical repair group (25.6 years), compared with physiologic (40.6 years, <em>P =</em> .005) and non-surgical patients (43.8 years, <em>P =</em> .01). The arrhythmia types included intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (n = 20), focal atrial tachycardia (n = 3), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n = 2), and atrial fibrillation (n = 6). Cavomitral isthmus ablation was frequently required across all groups. Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 3 patients required repeat ablation; all experienced new arrhythmia mechanisms distinct from the index procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Supraventricular tachycardia patterns varied by surgical background, but cavomitral isthmus ablation was commonly indicated. CA is a key therapeutic strategy in the long-term rhythm management of cc-TGA patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1893-1900"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.08.038
Xiaoke Liu MD, PhD , Xiaoyan Li MD , Paul Friedman MD , Yong-Mei Cha MD , Abhishek Deshmukh MD , Siva Mulpuru MD , Samuel Asirvatham MD
{"title":"Prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy super-response by left bundle branch area pacing using an artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiogram","authors":"Xiaoke Liu MD, PhD , Xiaoyan Li MD , Paul Friedman MD , Yong-Mei Cha MD , Abhishek Deshmukh MD , Siva Mulpuru MD , Samuel Asirvatham MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.08.038","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.08.038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 2019-2021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.012
Hideyuki Hasebe MD , Yoshitaka Furuyashiki MD
Background
Omnipolar mapping is an emerging technology with the potential to identify the critical conduction site in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI).
Objective
This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy of omnipolar mapping–guided targeted ablation to create a CTI block.
Methods
Patients who underwent a CTI block using radiofrequency applications (RFAs) were included. Omnipolar mapping was performed during CTI-dependent atrial flutter or pacing from the coronary sinus with a drive train (S1) and a single extra stimulus (S2), and 2 omnipolar maps were created: one with annotation of local potentials after S1 pacing (S1 map) and the other after S2 pacing (S2 map). RFAs were preferentially attempted at the atrial activation focusing sites (AAFSs) where atrial electrical excitation conducts centripetally toward those sites and centrifugally away from them in the omnipolar map.
Results
50 patients were included. AAFSs were identified in 33 of 38 patients in whom an omnipolar map was created during sustained atrial flutter and in the S2 map in 11 of 12 patients in whom an omnipolar map was created during programmed pacing from the coronary sinus. No AAFS was identified in the S1 map. In the 44 patients in whom AAFSs were identified, a block line in the CTI was completed only by RFAs at the AAFSs, and a continuous linear ablation in the CTI was not necessary.
Conclusion
An omnipolar mapping system can identify critical sites for a CTI block by visualizing AAFSs. The AAFSs might be preferable ablation targets in a targeted CTI block.
{"title":"Utility of omnipolar mapping–guided cavotricuspid isthmus block","authors":"Hideyuki Hasebe MD , Yoshitaka Furuyashiki MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Omnipolar mapping is an emerging technology with the potential to identify the critical conduction site in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy of omnipolar mapping–guided targeted ablation to create a CTI block.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent a CTI block using radiofrequency applications (RFAs) were included. Omnipolar mapping was performed during CTI-dependent atrial flutter or pacing from the coronary sinus with a drive train (S1) and a single extra stimulus (S2), and 2 omnipolar maps were created: one with annotation of local potentials after S1 pacing (S1 map) and the other after S2 pacing (S2 map). RFAs were preferentially attempted at the atrial activation focusing sites (AAFSs) where atrial electrical excitation conducts centripetally toward those sites and centrifugally away from them in the omnipolar map.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>50 patients were included. AAFSs were identified in 33 of 38 patients in whom an omnipolar map was created during sustained atrial flutter and in the S2 map in 11 of 12 patients in whom an omnipolar map was created during programmed pacing from the coronary sinus. No AAFS was identified in the S1 map. In the 44 patients in whom AAFSs were identified, a block line in the CTI was completed only by RFAs at the AAFSs, and a continuous linear ablation in the CTI was not necessary.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An omnipolar mapping system can identify critical sites for a CTI block by visualizing AAFSs. The AAFSs might be preferable ablation targets in a targeted CTI block.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1877-1885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.011
Adam Mohmand-Borkowski MD, PhD, FHRS , Nora Glass MEd, BSN , Tendoh Timoh MD , Peter L. Friedman MD, PhD, FHRS , Tomasz Rozmyslowicz MD, PhD
Background
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become an attractive alternative to chronic anticoagulation in the very elderly with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the outcomes and usefulness of this procedure in this population are limited.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to analyze the real-world outcomes of LAAO in the very elderly.
Methods
The outcomes of LAAO implantation in very elderly patients aged ≥85 years (average 88.1 years) compared with those in younger patients aged <85 years (average 76.7 years), from a single hospital center serving one of the oldest communities in the United States, were retrospectively analyzed. Successful procedures (at implant), procedural complications, 45-day device-related readmission, device-related thrombus (DRT), stroke, and death within 1 year were examined.
Results
A total of 342 LAAO device implantations were performed during the analysis period, with a high success rate of 98.5% and a very low major complication rate of 0.3%. There was no difference in the in-hospital outcomes or complication rates between the 2 groups. The ischemic stroke rate was 2.6% at 1 year and was not significantly different between the groups. The 1-year all-cause mortality was 14.6% in those aged ≥85 years as compared with 7.9% in those aged <85 years (P = .09).
Conclusion
LAAO is as safe and effective in the very elderly as in the younger population and may be performed with a very low complication rate. There is a trend toward increased 1-year mortality in the very elderly.
{"title":"Real-world outcomes of left atrial appendage closure in very elderly compared with younger patients","authors":"Adam Mohmand-Borkowski MD, PhD, FHRS , Nora Glass MEd, BSN , Tendoh Timoh MD , Peter L. Friedman MD, PhD, FHRS , Tomasz Rozmyslowicz MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has become an attractive alternative to chronic anticoagulation in the very elderly with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the outcomes and usefulness of this procedure in this population are limited.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to analyze the real-world outcomes of LAAO in the very elderly.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The outcomes of LAAO implantation in very elderly patients aged ≥85 years (average 88.1 years) compared with those in younger patients aged <85 years (average 76.7 years), from a single hospital center serving one of the oldest communities in the United States, were retrospectively analyzed. Successful procedures (at implant), procedural complications, 45-day device-related readmission, device-related thrombus (DRT), stroke, and death within 1 year were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 342 LAAO device implantations were performed during the analysis period, with a high success rate of 98.5% and a very low major complication rate of 0.3%. There was no difference in the in-hospital outcomes or complication rates between the 2 groups. The ischemic stroke rate was 2.6% at 1 year and was not significantly different between the groups. The 1-year all-cause mortality was 14.6% in those aged ≥85 years as compared with 7.9% in those aged <85 years (<em>P</em> = .09).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LAAO is as safe and effective in the very elderly as in the younger population and may be performed with a very low complication rate. There is a trend toward increased 1-year mortality in the very elderly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1993-2000"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal ablation method characterized by favorable tissue selectivity and a low complication rate. However, hemolysis has recently emerged as a PFA-specific concern, particularly associated with the FARAPULSE system.
Objective
To assess the incidence and clinical relevance of hemolysis following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the PulseSelect system, in comparison with FARAPULSE and conventional radiofrequency (RF) ablation.
Methods
This retrospective study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between October 2024 and February 2025 (RF: n = 15; FARAPULSE: n = 39; PulseSelect: n = 66). Hemolysis markers—free plasma hemoglobin, haptoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, and creatinine—were measured before and after ablation.
Results
PFA was associated with significantly higher the post-/pre-ablation ratio of free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, whereas the ratio of haptoglobin were significantly lower than with RF. The PulseSelect system resulted in less hemolysis than the FARAPULSE system, as evidenced by smaller increases in free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, and by higher haptoglobin. Notably, although free plasma hemoglobin increased after ablation with both the PulseSelect and FARAPULSE systems, in contrast to FARAPULSE, no correlation was observed between the number of PulseSelect applications and free plasma hemoglobin. No cases of acute kidney injury occurred in any group.
Conclusion
The PulseSelect system induced only mild, subclinical hemolysis—comparable to that seen with FARAPULSE—without any clinically significant anemia or acute kidney injury, even in the absence of a limit on the number of applications. These findings support the safe and flexible use of PulseSelect, not only for pulmonary vein isolation, but also for additional lesion sets in more complex ablation procedures.
脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种具有良好的组织选择性和低并发症发生率的非热消融方法。然而,溶血最近已成为pfa特异性关注的问题,特别是与FARAPULSE系统相关。目的评估脉冲选择系统与FARAPULSE和常规射频消融(RF)相比,房颤(AF)消融后溶血的发生率和临床相关性。方法本回顾性研究纳入了2024年10月至2025年2月期间连续接受房颤消融的120例患者(RF: n = 15; FARAPULSE: n = 39; PulseSelect: n = 66)。消融前后测定溶血标志物——游离血浆血红蛋白、接触红蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、总胆红素和肌酐。结果spfa与消融前后游离血浆血红蛋白、LDH、总胆红素比值显著升高,而与RF相关的触珠蛋白比值显著降低。与FARAPULSE相比,PulseSelect系统导致的溶血较少,这可以从游离血浆血红蛋白、LDH和总胆红素的增加较小以及接触珠蛋白的增加中得到证明。值得注意的是,尽管使用pulse seselect和FARAPULSE系统消融后游离血浆血红蛋白增加,但与FARAPULSE相比,pulse seselect应用数量与游离血浆血红蛋白之间没有相关性。两组均未发生急性肾损伤。结论:PulseSelect系统仅诱导轻度的亚临床溶血,与farapuls相当,即使在没有应用数量限制的情况下,也没有任何临床显著的贫血或急性肾损伤。这些发现支持PulseSelect安全灵活的使用,不仅用于肺静脉隔离,也用于更复杂消融过程中的附加病变组。
{"title":"Differential subclinical hemolysis after pulsed field ablation using the FARAPULSE pentaspline catheter vs the PulseSelect circular multi-electrode array catheter","authors":"Sayana Kuraoka MD , Masatsugu Nozoe MD, PhD , Hiroshi Mannoji MD, PhD , Ryo Miyake MD , Tomoki Uchikawa MD, PhD , Akihito Ishikita MD, PhD , Daisuke Nagatomo MD , Nobuhiro Suematsu MD, PhD , Toru Kubota MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.08.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.08.042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal ablation method characterized by favorable tissue selectivity and a low complication rate. However, hemolysis has recently emerged as a PFA-specific concern, particularly associated with the FARAPULSE system.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the incidence and clinical relevance of hemolysis following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using the PulseSelect system, in comparison with FARAPULSE and conventional radiofrequency (RF) ablation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 120 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between October 2024 and February 2025 (RF: n = 15; FARAPULSE: n = 39; PulseSelect: n = 66). Hemolysis markers—free plasma hemoglobin, haptoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), total bilirubin, and creatinine—were measured before and after ablation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PFA was associated with significantly higher the post-/pre-ablation ratio of free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, whereas the ratio of haptoglobin were significantly lower than with RF. The PulseSelect system resulted in less hemolysis than the FARAPULSE system, as evidenced by smaller increases in free plasma hemoglobin, LDH, and total bilirubin, and by higher haptoglobin. Notably, although free plasma hemoglobin increased after ablation with both the PulseSelect and FARAPULSE systems, in contrast to FARAPULSE, no correlation was observed between the number of PulseSelect applications and free plasma hemoglobin. No cases of acute kidney injury occurred in any group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PulseSelect system induced only mild, subclinical hemolysis—comparable to that seen with FARAPULSE—without any clinically significant anemia or acute kidney injury, even in the absence of a limit on the number of applications. These findings support the safe and flexible use of PulseSelect, not only for pulmonary vein isolation, but also for additional lesion sets in more complex ablation procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1911-1918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.019
Jacob R. Heath MD , Sangwoo Han MD, PhD , Ashraf Alzahrani MBBCh , David Hamon MD , E. Michael Powers MD, MBA , Sergio Conti MD, PhD, FHRS , Peter D. Farjo MD, MS , Paari Dominic MBBS, MPH
Background
Updated guidelines recognize catheter ablation as a first-line therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal timing of catheter ablation following AF diagnosis remains uncertain.
Objective
This study assessed the impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) <1 year vs DAT ≥1 year on AF recurrence and adverse clinical outcomes.
Methods
We queried the TriNetX Research Network for patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of AF who underwent ablation between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on DAT <1 year vs ≥1 year and matched using 1:1 propensity scores, resulting in 8403 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined as a composite of cardioversion, antiarrhythmic use, or re-ablation at 3 and 5 years, after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included a composite of heart failure exacerbation, ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality, along with individual components.
Results
DAT <1 year was associated with significantly lower AF recurrence both at 3 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72]; P < .001) and 5 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72]; P < .001). At 3 years, all secondary outcomes were significantly reduced in the DAT <1 year group, except for incident cerebrovascular accident and mortality. At 5 years, all secondary outcomes were significantly reduced in the DAT <1 year group.
Conclusion
Catheter ablation within 1 year of AF diagnosis is associated with reduced AF recurrence and major adverse clinical outcomes. These findings support early referral for catheter ablation.
{"title":"Early vs delayed ablation for new-onset atrial fibrillation: 5-Year real-world data outcomes","authors":"Jacob R. Heath MD , Sangwoo Han MD, PhD , Ashraf Alzahrani MBBCh , David Hamon MD , E. Michael Powers MD, MBA , Sergio Conti MD, PhD, FHRS , Peter D. Farjo MD, MS , Paari Dominic MBBS, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.019","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.09.019","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Updated guidelines recognize catheter ablation as a first-line therapy for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The optimal timing of catheter ablation following AF diagnosis remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed the impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) <1 year vs DAT ≥1 year on AF recurrence and adverse clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried the TriNetX Research Network for patients ≥18 years of age with a diagnosis of AF who underwent ablation between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019. Patients were stratified into cohorts based on DAT <1 year vs ≥1 year and matched using 1:1 propensity scores, resulting in 8403 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome was AF recurrence, defined as a composite of cardioversion, antiarrhythmic use, or re-ablation at 3 and 5 years, after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes included a composite of heart failure exacerbation, ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality, along with individual components.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>DAT <1 year was associated with significantly lower AF recurrence both at 3 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72]; <em>P</em> < .001) and 5 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval: 0.64–0.72]; <em>P</em> < .001). At 3 years, all secondary outcomes were significantly reduced in the DAT <1 year group, except for incident cerebrovascular accident and mortality. At 5 years, all secondary outcomes were significantly reduced in the DAT <1 year group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Catheter ablation within 1 year of AF diagnosis is associated with reduced AF recurrence and major adverse clinical outcomes. These findings support early referral for catheter ablation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages 1886-1892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}