首页 > 最新文献

Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation最新文献

英文 中文
Transforming latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) testing and treatment at a federally qualified health center 转化潜伏结核感染(LTBI)的检测和治疗在联邦合格的卫生中心
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100766
Ranjani K. Paradise , Carolyn Fisher , Hanna H. Haptu , Deborah McManus , Jennifer Cochran
  • The Massachusetts Department of Public Health partnered with Lynn Community Health Center (LCHC) to scale up testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) for a non-US born patient population. The project team developed a workflow to manage patients through the LTBI care cascade with screening performed in primary care and diagnostic testing, evaluation, and treatment undertaken by a TB team within the health center. To support the clinical workflow, the team implemented process improvements, addressed access barriers, and made electronic health record (EHR) enhancements.
  • LCHC successfully increased LTBI testing and treatment for non-US born patients, while sustaining engagement through the care cascade.
  • Strategic distribution of responsibilities, attention to process refinement, EHR enhancements, and collaboration with public health experts helped make the scale-up possible.
  • Three core factors kept patients more engaged, minimized gaps in treatment, and alleviated burdens associated with LTBI treatment: 1) flexibility with scheduling visits, 2) focus on building trusting, supportive relationships between care providers and patients, and 3) consistent outreach, reminders, and follow-up with patients on treatment.
  • Maintaining high testing and treatment volumes requires consistent effort, sustained attention, and staffing continuity.
•马萨诸塞州公共卫生部与林恩社区卫生中心(LCHC)合作,为非美国出生的患者群体扩大潜伏性结核病感染(LTBI)的检测和治疗。项目团队制定了一个工作流程,通过LTBI护理级联管理患者,在初级保健中进行筛查,并由卫生中心内的结核病小组进行诊断测试、评估和治疗。为了支持临床工作流程,该团队实施了流程改进,解决了访问障碍,并增强了电子健康记录(EHR)。•LCHC成功地增加了非美国出生患者的LTBI测试和治疗,同时通过护理级联保持参与。•责任的战略性分配、对流程改进的关注、电子病历的加强以及与公共卫生专家的合作有助于扩大规模。•三个核心因素使患者更积极参与,减少治疗间隔,减轻LTBI治疗相关的负担:1)灵活安排就诊时间,2)专注于在护理提供者和患者之间建立信任和支持的关系,以及3)持续的外展,提醒和随访患者的治疗。•保持高检测和治疗量需要持续的努力、持续的关注和人员配置的连续性。
{"title":"Transforming latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) testing and treatment at a federally qualified health center","authors":"Ranjani K. Paradise ,&nbsp;Carolyn Fisher ,&nbsp;Hanna H. Haptu ,&nbsp;Deborah McManus ,&nbsp;Jennifer Cochran","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100766","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100766","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The Massachusetts Department of Public Health partnered with Lynn Community Health Center (LCHC) to scale up testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) for a non-US born patient population. The project team developed a workflow to manage patients through the LTBI care cascade with screening performed in primary care and diagnostic testing, evaluation, and treatment undertaken by a TB team within the health center. To support the clinical workflow, the team implemented process improvements, addressed access barriers, and made electronic health record (EHR) enhancements.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>LCHC successfully increased LTBI testing and treatment for non-US born patients, while sustaining engagement through the care cascade.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Strategic distribution of responsibilities, attention to process refinement, EHR enhancements, and collaboration with public health experts helped make the scale-up possible.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Three core factors kept patients more engaged, minimized gaps in treatment, and alleviated burdens associated with LTBI treatment: 1) flexibility with scheduling visits, 2) focus on building trusting, supportive relationships between care providers and patients, and 3) consistent outreach, reminders, and follow-up with patients on treatment.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Maintaining high testing and treatment volumes requires consistent effort, sustained attention, and staffing continuity.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144633806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring prescriptions dispensed from urgent care through the VA community care benefit 衡量通过VA社区护理福利从紧急护理中分配的处方
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100765
Alexis K. Barrett , John P. Cashy , John Roehm , Xinhua Zhao , Maria K. Mor , Katie J. Suda , Chester B. Good , Shari S. Rogal , Kelvin A. Tran , Jennifer A. Hale , Ron Nosek , Carolyn T. Thorpe , Francesca Cunningham , Michael J. Fine , Walid F. Gellad

Background

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) now offers eligible Veterans an urgent care benefit covering visits and 14-day prescriptions outside of VA. Prescriptions written and dispensed outside VA lack the clinical decision support of VA-issued prescriptions, raising concerns about safety and polypharmacy. To date, there has been limited analyses of prescribing patterns through the urgent care benefit.

Methods

We used a repeated cross-sectional design to examine Veterans who filled non-VA urgent care prescriptions from 07/30/2019 to 03/20/2023. Data were sourced from the Community Care Reimbursement System (CCRS), which tracks all VA-paid medications dispensed by non-VA pharmacies. We identified potentially noncompliant prescriptions as those not meeting VA urgent care benefit restrictions. We also identified prescriptions continued in VA as a “new VA medication” after 30-days from the urgent care fill.

Results

Overall, 83,862 Veterans received 271,476 non-VA urgent care prescriptions. Veterans’ average age was 55.9, with 79.3 % male, 73.0 % White, 86.7 % non-Hispanic, and 41.4 % rural dwelling. Urgent care use increased from 341 prescription fills in March 2020 to 9738 in January 2023. Frequently filled prescriptions included antimicrobials (n = 114,492, 42.2 %) and hormones/synthetics/modifiers, like steroids (n = 44,457, 16.4 %). Potentially noncompliant prescriptions accounted for 9.3 %, with 6.7 % not on the urgent/emergent formulary and 2.6 % supplied for over 14 days. Over 70,704 (26.0 %) prescriptions were continued in VA post-urgent care visit, of which 15 % had no prior VA fill (i.e., new VA medication). Veterans with new continued VA prescriptions were more likely to be male (79.4 % vs. 73.9 %) and from urban areas (59.3 % vs. 57.5 %) (All P < .001).

Conclusions

Veterans increasingly received non-VA prescriptions through urgent care centers in the community from 2019 to 2023, including drug classes of interest to VA due to potential risks of inappropriate prescribing (e.g., steroids) or drug interactions (e.g., antibiotics). The CCRS database can be integrated with other VA databases as a quality improvement tool to improve care coordination and drug safety.

Implications

This evaluation highlights the need for improved clinical decision support for non-VA prescriptions and demonstrates the potential of integrated data systems to monitor and enhance medication safety and coordination within VA.

Level of evidence

Cross-sectional analysis of national VA data.
退伍军人事务部(VA)现在为符合条件的退伍军人提供紧急护理福利,包括访问和在VA以外的14天处方。在VA以外编写和分发的处方缺乏VA签发的处方的临床决策支持,引起了对安全性和多药的担忧。迄今为止,通过紧急护理效益对处方模式的分析有限。方法采用重复横断面设计,对2019年7月30日至2023年3月20日期间开具非va紧急护理处方的退伍军人进行调查。数据来自社区医疗报销系统(CCRS),该系统跟踪所有由va支付的非va药房分发的药物。我们将潜在的不合规处方确定为不符合VA紧急护理福利限制的处方。我们还确定了在紧急护理填补后30天内继续在VA使用的处方为“新的VA药物”。结果总体而言,83862名退伍军人收到了271476张非va紧急护理处方。退伍军人的平均年龄为55.9岁,其中79.3%为男性,73.0%为白人,86.7%为非西班牙裔,41.4%为农村居民。紧急护理使用从2020年3月的341张处方增加到2023年1月的9738张。经常配药的处方包括抗菌剂(n = 114,492, 42.2%)和激素/合成物/调节剂,如类固醇(n = 44,457, 16.4%)。潜在的不合规处方占9.3%,其中6.7%不在紧急/紧急处方中,2.6%的处方超过14天。超过70,704(26.0%)处方在VA紧急护理后访问中继续使用,其中15%没有先前的VA填充(即新的VA药物)。有新的持续退伍军人VA处方的退伍军人更有可能是男性(79.4%对73.9%)和来自城市地区(59.3%对57.5%)(All P <;措施)。从2019年到2023年,退伍军人越来越多地通过社区紧急护理中心获得非VA处方,包括由于处方不当(如类固醇)或药物相互作用(如抗生素)的潜在风险而引起VA感兴趣的药物类别。CCRS数据库可以与其他VA数据库集成,作为质量改进工具,以改善护理协调和药物安全。本评价强调了改进非VA处方的临床决策支持的必要性,并展示了集成数据系统在VA内监测和加强药物安全性和协调方面的潜力。证据水平:全国VA数据的横断面分析。
{"title":"Measuring prescriptions dispensed from urgent care through the VA community care benefit","authors":"Alexis K. Barrett ,&nbsp;John P. Cashy ,&nbsp;John Roehm ,&nbsp;Xinhua Zhao ,&nbsp;Maria K. Mor ,&nbsp;Katie J. Suda ,&nbsp;Chester B. Good ,&nbsp;Shari S. Rogal ,&nbsp;Kelvin A. Tran ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Hale ,&nbsp;Ron Nosek ,&nbsp;Carolyn T. Thorpe ,&nbsp;Francesca Cunningham ,&nbsp;Michael J. Fine ,&nbsp;Walid F. Gellad","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100765","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100765","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) now offers eligible Veterans an urgent care benefit covering visits and 14-day prescriptions outside of VA. Prescriptions written and dispensed outside VA lack the clinical decision support of VA-issued prescriptions, raising concerns about safety and polypharmacy. To date, there has been limited analyses of prescribing patterns through the urgent care benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a repeated cross-sectional design to examine Veterans who filled non-VA urgent care prescriptions from 07/30/2019 to 03/20/2023. Data were sourced from the Community Care Reimbursement System (CCRS), which tracks all VA-paid medications dispensed by non-VA pharmacies. We identified potentially noncompliant prescriptions as those not meeting VA urgent care benefit restrictions. We also identified prescriptions continued in VA as a “new VA medication” after 30-days from the urgent care fill.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 83,862 Veterans received 271,476 non-VA urgent care prescriptions. Veterans’ average age was 55.9, with 79.3 % male, 73.0 % White, 86.7 % non-Hispanic, and 41.4 % rural dwelling. Urgent care use increased from 341 prescription fills in March 2020 to 9738 in January 2023. Frequently filled prescriptions included antimicrobials (n = 114,492, 42.2 %) and hormones/synthetics/modifiers, like steroids (n = 44,457, 16.4 %). Potentially noncompliant prescriptions accounted for 9.3 %, with 6.7 % not on the urgent/emergent formulary and 2.6 % supplied for over 14 days. Over 70,704 (26.0 %) prescriptions were continued in VA post-urgent care visit, of which 15 % had no prior VA fill (i.e., new VA medication). Veterans with new continued VA prescriptions were more likely to be male (79.4 % vs. 73.9 %) and from urban areas (59.3 % vs. 57.5 %) (All P &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Veterans increasingly received non-VA prescriptions through urgent care centers in the community from 2019 to 2023, including drug classes of interest to VA due to potential risks of inappropriate prescribing (e.g., steroids) or drug interactions (e.g., antibiotics). The CCRS database can be integrated with other VA databases as a quality improvement tool to improve care coordination and drug safety.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>This evaluation highlights the need for improved clinical decision support for non-VA prescriptions and demonstrates the potential of integrated data systems to monitor and enhance medication safety and coordination within VA.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Cross-sectional analysis of national VA data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144471110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical decision support amidst a global pandemic: Value of near real-time feedback in advancing appropriate post-discharge opioid prescribing for surgical patients 全球流行病中的临床决策支持:近实时反馈在推进外科患者适当的出院后阿片类药物处方中的价值
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100764
Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones , Margaret T. Berrigan , Jayson S. Marwaha , Chris J. Kennedy , Kortney A. Robinson , Larry A. Nathanson , Charles H. Cook , Jordan D. Bohnen , Gabriel A. Brat

Implementation lessons

Non-evidence based factors influence post-surgical opioid prescribing practices. Delivering automated near real-time opioid prescribing feedback may encourage providers to prescribe opioid quantities which are more aligned with patient consumption and institutional guidelines.
COVID-19 presented unprecedented challenges to healthcare delivery. We observed a substantial deviation in guideline-concordant opioids prescribing during the initial outbreak. However, our institution's pre-existing opioid prescribing feedback system and decision aid may have helped limit the duration and magnitude of the observed deviations by informing prescribers of atypically large opioid prescriptions and encouraging use of institutional data.
Combined with provider education, a non-directive decision aid, in the form of near, real-time email feedback, may be an effective mechanism to advance evidence-based opioid prescribing, as it retains flexibility and provider autonomy while encouraging data-driven decision making.
实施教训非循证因素影响术后阿片类药物处方操作。提供近乎实时的自动化阿片类药物处方反馈可能会鼓励提供者开出更符合患者消费和机构指南的阿片类药物数量。COVID-19给医疗服务带来了前所未有的挑战。我们观察到,在最初爆发期间,指南一致的阿片类药物处方存在重大偏差。然而,我们机构已有的阿片类药物处方反馈系统和决策辅助可能通过通知处方者非典型的大阿片类药物处方和鼓励使用机构数据来帮助限制观察到的偏差的持续时间和程度。与提供者教育相结合,以近距离实时电子邮件反馈形式提供的非指导性决策援助可能是推进循证阿片类药物处方的有效机制,因为它在鼓励数据驱动决策的同时保留了灵活性和提供者自主权。
{"title":"Clinical decision support amidst a global pandemic: Value of near real-time feedback in advancing appropriate post-discharge opioid prescribing for surgical patients","authors":"Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones ,&nbsp;Margaret T. Berrigan ,&nbsp;Jayson S. Marwaha ,&nbsp;Chris J. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Kortney A. Robinson ,&nbsp;Larry A. Nathanson ,&nbsp;Charles H. Cook ,&nbsp;Jordan D. Bohnen ,&nbsp;Gabriel A. Brat","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100764","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100764","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Implementation lessons</h3><div>Non-evidence based factors influence post-surgical opioid prescribing practices. Delivering automated near real-time opioid prescribing feedback may encourage providers to prescribe opioid quantities which are more aligned with patient consumption and institutional guidelines.</div><div>COVID-19 presented unprecedented challenges to healthcare delivery. We observed a substantial deviation in guideline-concordant opioids prescribing during the initial outbreak. However, our institution's pre-existing opioid prescribing feedback system and decision aid may have helped limit the duration and magnitude of the observed deviations by informing prescribers of atypically large opioid prescriptions and encouraging use of institutional data.</div><div>Combined with provider education, a non-directive decision aid, in the form of near, real-time email feedback, may be an effective mechanism to advance evidence-based opioid prescribing, as it retains flexibility and provider autonomy while encouraging data-driven decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144071498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
One cutoff is not enough: Assessing different area deprivation index cutoffs for insurance types on surgical Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) 一个分界点是不够的:评估不同保险类型的区域剥夺指数分界点对手术结局满意程度排序(DOOR)的影响
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100762
Susanne Schmidt , Michael A. Jacobs , Daniel E. Hall , Karyn B. Stitzenberg , Lillian S. Kao , Bradley B. Brimhall , Chen-Pin Wang , Laura S. Manuel , Hoah-Der Su , Jonathan C. Silverstein , Paula K. Shireman

Background

Social Determinants of Health impact health outcomes. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is used to risk-adjust for neighborhood affluence/deprivation but guidance on choosing deprivation cutoffs is lacking. We hypothesize that different ADI cutoffs are required for different insurance types.

Methods

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data 2013–2019 merged with electronic health records from three academic healthcare systems. Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) assessed the association of ADI cutoffs for different insurance types, adjusted for operative stress, frailty, and case status (elective, urgent, emergent). Secondary analyses assessed the association of ADI with case status.

Results

Patients with Private insurance living in areas with ADI>85 had higher/worse DOOR outcomes, which lost significance after adjusting for case status. Medicare cases with ADI>75 exhibited higher/worse DOOR outcomes even after adjusting for case status. ADI was not associated with outcomes in the Medicaid and Uninsured groups. High ADI was associated with increased odds of urgent and emergent cases for the Private and Medicare but not Medicaid or Uninsured groups.

Conclusions

ADI is a useful metric to identify at-risk patients and can be used for risk adjustment. Health systems must understand their population demographics and use their data to determine ADI cutoffs. Patients in deprived neighborhoods have higher odds of urgent and emergent surgeries, despite having Private insurance or Medicare, suggesting that delays/barriers to primary and preventive care may be a major driver of worse outcomes. While insurance coverage is important, healthcare policies supporting reductions in urgent/emergent cases could have the largest impact on improving outcomes.
健康的社会决定因素影响健康结果。区域剥夺指数(ADI)用于社区富裕/剥夺风险调整,但缺乏选择剥夺截止点的指导。我们假设不同的保险类型需要不同的ADI截止值。方法将2013-2019年国家外科质量改进计划数据与来自三个学术医疗保健系统的电子健康记录合并。结果排序的可取性(DOOR)评估了不同保险类型的ADI截止值的相关性,并根据手术压力、虚弱和病例状态(可选、紧急、紧急)进行了调整。二次分析评估了ADI与病例状态的关系。结果居住在ADI>;85地区的私人保险患者的DOOR结果较高/较差,但在调整病例状态后不具有显著性。即使在调整了病例状态后,adi75的医疗保险病例也表现出更高/更差的DOOR结果。在医疗补助和未参保组中,ADI与结果无关。高ADI与私人和医疗保险的紧急和紧急病例的几率增加有关,而与医疗补助或无保险群体无关。结论sadi是识别高危患者的有效指标,可用于风险调整。卫生系统必须了解他们的人口统计数据,并使用他们的数据来确定每日摄入量的下限。贫困社区的患者尽管拥有私人保险或医疗保险,但紧急和紧急手术的几率更高,这表明初级和预防性护理的延误/障碍可能是导致更糟糕结果的主要原因。虽然保险覆盖面很重要,但支持减少紧急/紧急病例的医疗保健政策可能对改善结果产生最大影响。
{"title":"One cutoff is not enough: Assessing different area deprivation index cutoffs for insurance types on surgical Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR)","authors":"Susanne Schmidt ,&nbsp;Michael A. Jacobs ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Hall ,&nbsp;Karyn B. Stitzenberg ,&nbsp;Lillian S. Kao ,&nbsp;Bradley B. Brimhall ,&nbsp;Chen-Pin Wang ,&nbsp;Laura S. Manuel ,&nbsp;Hoah-Der Su ,&nbsp;Jonathan C. Silverstein ,&nbsp;Paula K. Shireman","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100762","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100762","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Social Determinants of Health impact health outcomes. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is used to risk-adjust for neighborhood affluence/deprivation but guidance on choosing deprivation cutoffs is lacking. We hypothesize that different ADI cutoffs are required for different insurance types.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data 2013–2019 merged with electronic health records from three academic healthcare systems. Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) assessed the association of ADI cutoffs for different insurance types, adjusted for operative stress, frailty, and case status (elective, urgent, emergent). Secondary analyses assessed the association of ADI with case status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with Private insurance living in areas with ADI&gt;85 had higher/worse DOOR outcomes, which lost significance after adjusting for case status. Medicare cases with ADI&gt;75 exhibited higher/worse DOOR outcomes even after adjusting for case status. ADI was not associated with outcomes in the Medicaid and Uninsured groups. High ADI was associated with increased odds of urgent and emergent cases for the Private and Medicare but not Medicaid or Uninsured groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ADI is a useful metric to identify at-risk patients and can be used for risk adjustment. Health systems must understand their population demographics and use their data to determine ADI cutoffs. Patients in deprived neighborhoods have higher odds of urgent and emergent surgeries, despite having Private insurance or Medicare, suggesting that delays/barriers to primary and preventive care may be a major driver of worse outcomes. While insurance coverage is important, healthcare policies supporting reductions in urgent/emergent cases could have the largest impact on improving outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100762"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143946666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking handoffs to optimize continuity: Four practical lessons from a novel hospitalist model 重新思考交接以优化连续性:来自一种新型医院模式的四个实践经验
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100763
Andrew W. Schram , Caleb J. Murphy , David O. Meltzer
{"title":"Rethinking handoffs to optimize continuity: Four practical lessons from a novel hospitalist model","authors":"Andrew W. Schram ,&nbsp;Caleb J. Murphy ,&nbsp;David O. Meltzer","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100763","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100763","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143936625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Delivering health equity at scale: Organizational experience with value-based care focused on marginalized populations 大规模实现卫生公平:以边缘化人群为重点的基于价值的护理的组织经验
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100760
Michael Tang , Charisse Hunter , Shoshanah Brown , Aarthi Rao , Pooja K. Mehta , Kameron Matthews
{"title":"Delivering health equity at scale: Organizational experience with value-based care focused on marginalized populations","authors":"Michael Tang ,&nbsp;Charisse Hunter ,&nbsp;Shoshanah Brown ,&nbsp;Aarthi Rao ,&nbsp;Pooja K. Mehta ,&nbsp;Kameron Matthews","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100760","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100760","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143894977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using codesign to engage primary care practices in a participatory change process 使用协同设计使初级保健实践参与到参与式变革过程中
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100761
Sarah J. Fadem , Benjamin F. Crabtree , Lawrence C. Kleinman
Healthcare has experienced significant transformation in recent years with many changes being imposed on practices from outside sources. When tailoring outside interventions to specific settings, it is important to engage practice members in participatory processes. Yet, tailoring remains a difficult and poorly understood element of implementation. Codesign is one method to achieve context-sensitive, bottom-up change by engaging stakeholders in the design process. With a complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective, codesign reframes interventions as tools to empower practices to drive change based on local challenges and experiences rather than change being imposed upon them. Observing adaptations and facilitating innovations of practice members offers insight into dynamics of the CAS, implementation context, and its limitations. Here, the codesign process is illustrated through a pediatric primary care practice adopting integrated health.
Contextual inquiry was performed using ethnographic observations to identify barriers and facilitators to integrated health. Observation findings informed codesign workshops with clinicians. Workshop transcripts and drawings were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach guided by the Practice Change Model (PCM), an established framework based on complexity science concepts. In these workshops, clinicians described tension between their motivations to care for complex patients and limitations imposed by the health system. Participants’ knowledge of their real-world context allowed them to identify resources and opportunities for changes they could make within their current environment. The reconciliation of the ideal and the real is a core benefit of codesign methods. This innovative approach can be applied more generally to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions that reflect real world interactions and complexities.
近年来,医疗保健经历了重大变革,外部资源对实践施加了许多变化。在针对特定环境调整外部干预措施时,重要的是让实践成员参与到参与过程中。然而,裁剪仍然是实现的一个困难且难以理解的元素。协同设计是一种通过让涉众参与设计过程来实现上下文敏感的、自下而上的变更的方法。从复杂的自适应系统(CAS)的角度来看,协同设计将干预重新定义为工具,使实践能够基于当地的挑战和经验来驱动变化,而不是将变化强加于他们。观察适应和促进实践成员的创新提供了对CAS动态、实施环境及其局限性的洞察。在这里,通过采用综合健康的儿科初级保健实践来说明协同设计过程。使用人种学观察进行上下文调查,以确定综合健康的障碍和促进因素。观察结果为临床医生共同设计研讨会提供了信息。工作坊记录和图纸使用实践变化模型(PCM)指导的浸入/结晶方法进行分析,PCM是基于复杂性科学概念建立的框架。在这些研讨会上,临床医生描述了他们照顾复杂患者的动机与卫生系统施加的限制之间的紧张关系。参与者对现实环境的了解使他们能够确定在当前环境中可以做出改变的资源和机会。理想与现实的协调是协同设计方法的核心优势。这种创新方法可以更广泛地应用于支持反映现实世界相互作用和复杂性的干预措施的制定、实施和评估。
{"title":"Using codesign to engage primary care practices in a participatory change process","authors":"Sarah J. Fadem ,&nbsp;Benjamin F. Crabtree ,&nbsp;Lawrence C. Kleinman","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100761","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100761","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Healthcare has experienced significant transformation in recent years with many changes being imposed on practices from outside sources. When tailoring outside interventions to specific settings, it is important to engage practice members in participatory processes. Yet, tailoring remains a difficult and poorly understood element of implementation. Codesign is one method to achieve context-sensitive, bottom-up change by engaging stakeholders in the design process. With a complex adaptive system (CAS) perspective, codesign reframes interventions as tools to empower practices to drive change based on local challenges and experiences rather than change being imposed upon them. Observing adaptations and facilitating innovations of practice members offers insight into dynamics of the CAS, implementation context, and its limitations. Here, the codesign process is illustrated through a pediatric primary care practice adopting integrated health.</div><div>Contextual inquiry was performed using ethnographic observations to identify barriers and facilitators to integrated health. Observation findings informed codesign workshops with clinicians. Workshop transcripts and drawings were analyzed using an immersion/crystallization approach guided by the Practice Change Model (PCM), an established framework based on complexity science concepts. In these workshops, clinicians described tension between their motivations to care for complex patients and limitations imposed by the health system. Participants’ knowledge of their real-world context allowed them to identify resources and opportunities for changes they could make within their current environment. The reconciliation of the ideal and the real is a core benefit of codesign methods. This innovative approach can be applied more generally to support the development, implementation, and evaluation of interventions that reflect real world interactions and complexities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143892158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Looking at military health system surgical procedures through the lens of an episode grouper 通过一集石斑鱼的镜头看军队卫生系统的外科手术程序
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100759
Beth A. Hawks , Jennifer Perloff , V.S. Senthil Kumar , Mary Jo Larson , John D. Chapman

Background

With mounting accountability pressure on their publicly funded health system and the demand for a medically ready military force, the military health system (MHS) employs a strategy to optimize care delivery. Research suggests that analysis of episodes of care is a valuable tool for identifying the relative resource use for a given procedure and can direct enhancements in care delivery.

Methods

This proof-of-concept study investigates the feasibility of grouping services for surgical patients into episodes of care. These episodes of care served as a unit of analysis for evaluating resource use within a public healthcare system. Borrowing from a grouping tool developed for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by Brandeis University, we developed methods to employ it with MHS clinical encounter and claims data. Data included all care paid for by the MHS from FY2009-2015, including care delivered inside and outside of their facilities.

Results

Using this analytic grouping tool, we grouped 49 percent of our administrative data into episodes of care. In these episodes, we see variation in both the care provided directly by the MHS and care provided by the network of private sector providers in rates of sequelae based on the service area for specific surgical procedures.

Conclusions

We offer a novel tool for health systems to evaluate their practice patterns, which can generate valuable strategies for efficiency gains and slowing spending.

Implications

Outside of the traditional population-based metrics to evaluate efficiency, episodes of care are a valuable tool for identifying the mix of services used to produce a given surgical outcome.
背景:由于公共资助的卫生系统面临越来越大的问责压力,以及对医疗就绪的军队的需求,军队卫生系统(MHS)采用了优化医疗服务提供的战略。研究表明,对护理事件的分析是一种有价值的工具,可以确定特定程序的相对资源使用情况,并可以直接提高护理服务。方法:本概念验证研究探讨了将外科病人的服务分组到护理事件中的可行性。这些护理事件作为评估公共医疗保健系统内资源使用的分析单元。借用布兰迪斯大学为医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心开发的分组工具,我们开发了将其用于MHS临床就诊和索赔数据的方法。数据包括MHS从2009-2015财年支付的所有医疗服务,包括在其设施内外提供的医疗服务。结果使用这个分析分组工具,我们将49%的行政数据分组到护理事件中。在这些事件中,我们看到MHS直接提供的护理和私营部门供应商网络提供的护理在基于特定外科手术服务区域的后遗症率方面存在差异。我们为卫生系统提供了一种评估其实践模式的新工具,可以为提高效率和减缓支出制定有价值的战略。除了传统的以人群为基础的评估效率的指标外,护理事件是确定用于产生给定手术结果的服务组合的有价值的工具。
{"title":"Looking at military health system surgical procedures through the lens of an episode grouper","authors":"Beth A. Hawks ,&nbsp;Jennifer Perloff ,&nbsp;V.S. Senthil Kumar ,&nbsp;Mary Jo Larson ,&nbsp;John D. Chapman","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100759","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100759","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With mounting accountability pressure on their publicly funded health system and the demand for a medically ready military force, the military health system (MHS) employs a strategy to optimize care delivery. Research suggests that analysis of episodes of care is a valuable tool for identifying the relative resource use for a given procedure and can direct enhancements in care delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This proof-of-concept study investigates the feasibility of grouping services for surgical patients into episodes of care. These episodes of care served as a unit of analysis for evaluating resource use within a public healthcare system. Borrowing from a grouping tool developed for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by Brandeis University, we developed methods to employ it with MHS clinical encounter and claims data. Data included all care paid for by the MHS from FY2009-2015, including care delivered inside and outside of their facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using this analytic grouping tool, we grouped 49 percent of our administrative data into episodes of care. In these episodes, we see variation in both the care provided directly by the MHS and care provided by the network of private sector providers in rates of sequelae based on the service area for specific surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We offer a novel tool for health systems to evaluate their practice patterns, which can generate valuable strategies for efficiency gains and slowing spending.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>Outside of the traditional population-based metrics to evaluate efficiency, episodes of care are a valuable tool for identifying the mix of services used to produce a given surgical outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143892157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in primary care encounter rates during the veteran health administration’s electronic health record transition 退伍军人健康管理局电子健康记录过渡期间初级保健就诊率的变化
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100758
Ashok Reddy , Jonathan Staloff , Jorge Rojas , Eric Gunnink , Scott Hagan , Alisa Becker , John Geyer , Stefanie A. Deeds , Karin Nelson , Edwin S. Wong

Background

Electronic health record (EHR) transitions can cause major disruptions in the provision of primary care services. Veteran Health Administration (VHA), one of the largest integrated healthcare systems, underwent a major EHR transition at two sites. To date, there is limited data on the experience of primary care service lines at EHR transition sites.

Objective

To describe and quantify changes in the provision of primary care services at two sites that have experienced EHR transition.

Design

We conducted a retrospective study of primary care encounters 12 months before and after EHR transition. In addition, we applied economic structural change analysis using the expanded length of time (10 years of prior primary care encounters at sites) to understand how the transition of EHR compares to other major changes in primary care encounter volume during this time period.

Data source and main measure

Primary care encounters were measured using algorithms pre- and post-EHR transition from the national VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and Cerner Millennium (CDW2) Databases.

Key results

In Spokane, the average number of monthly primary care encounters decreased from 7155 (SD = 682) in the 12 months prior to October 2020 (transition date) to 4181 (SD = 813) in the 12 months after implementation, a decrease of 41.6 %. The average number of monthly primary care encounters decreased from 8029 (SD = 511) in the 12 months prior to April 2022 (transition date) to 6495 (SD = 1152) in the 12 months after implementation, a decrease of 19.1 %. The structural change analysis identified EHR transition dates at both sites, including a major decrease in volume of primary care encounters.

Conclusions

Given the substantial decrease in primary care services, VHA must identify strategies to mitigate both the amount and the duration of reduced primary care encounters during the EHR transition.
背景电子健康记录(EHR)的过渡可能对初级保健服务的提供造成重大干扰。退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)是最大的综合医疗保健系统之一,在两个地点进行了重大的电子病历过渡。迄今为止,关于电子健康档案过渡站点初级保健服务线路经验的数据有限。目的描述和量化两个经历电子健康档案转型的地区初级保健服务的变化。设计:我们对电子病历转换前后12个月的初级保健就诊情况进行了回顾性研究。此外,我们应用了经济结构变化分析,使用扩大的时间长度(10年以前的初级保健就诊地点)来了解电子健康档案的过渡与这段时间内初级保健就诊数量的其他主要变化的比较。数据来源和主要测量方法使用从国家VHA公司数据仓库(CDW)和Cerner Millennium (CDW2)数据库转换的ehr前后算法测量初级保健就诊情况。在斯波坎市,平均每月初级保健就诊次数从2020年10月(过渡日期)前12个月的7155次(SD = 682次)下降到实施后12个月的4181次(SD = 813次),下降了41.6%。平均每月初级保健就诊次数从2022年4月(过渡日期)前12个月的8029次(SD = 511)下降到实施后12个月的6495次(SD = 1152),下降了19.1%。结构变化分析确定了两个地点的电子病历过渡日期,包括初级保健就诊数量的大幅减少。鉴于初级保健服务的大幅减少,VHA必须确定策略,以减轻在电子健康档案过渡期间减少的初级保健接触的数量和持续时间。
{"title":"Changes in primary care encounter rates during the veteran health administration’s electronic health record transition","authors":"Ashok Reddy ,&nbsp;Jonathan Staloff ,&nbsp;Jorge Rojas ,&nbsp;Eric Gunnink ,&nbsp;Scott Hagan ,&nbsp;Alisa Becker ,&nbsp;John Geyer ,&nbsp;Stefanie A. Deeds ,&nbsp;Karin Nelson ,&nbsp;Edwin S. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100758","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100758","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electronic health record (EHR) transitions can cause major disruptions in the provision of primary care services. Veteran Health Administration (VHA), one of the largest integrated healthcare systems, underwent a major EHR transition at two sites. To date, there is limited data on the experience of primary care service lines at EHR transition sites.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe and quantify changes in the provision of primary care services at two sites that have experienced EHR transition.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study of primary care encounters 12 months before and after EHR transition. In addition, we applied economic structural change analysis using the expanded length of time (10 years of prior primary care encounters at sites) to understand how the transition of EHR compares to other major changes in primary care encounter volume during this time period.</div></div><div><h3>Data source and main measure</h3><div>Primary care encounters were measured using algorithms pre- and post-EHR transition from the national VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and Cerner Millennium (CDW2) Databases.</div></div><div><h3>Key results</h3><div>In Spokane, the average number of monthly primary care encounters decreased from 7155 (SD = 682) in the 12 months prior to October 2020 (transition date) to 4181 (SD = 813) in the 12 months after implementation, a decrease of 41.6 %. The average number of monthly primary care encounters decreased from 8029 (SD = 511) in the 12 months prior to April 2022 (transition date) to 6495 (SD = 1152) in the 12 months after implementation, a decrease of 19.1 %. The structural change analysis identified EHR transition dates at both sites, including a major decrease in volume of primary care encounters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Given the substantial decrease in primary care services, VHA must identify strategies to mitigate both the amount and the duration of reduced primary care encounters during the EHR transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100758"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143579592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AI-enabled decision support: The convergence of technology and decision science 人工智能决策支持:技术与决策科学的融合。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100757
Danielle S. Browne , Ling Chu , Michael Burton , Joshua M. Liao
{"title":"AI-enabled decision support: The convergence of technology and decision science","authors":"Danielle S. Browne ,&nbsp;Ling Chu ,&nbsp;Michael Burton ,&nbsp;Joshua M. Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100757","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2025.100757","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143068195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1