Pub Date : 2025-07-30DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040104
Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Bryan Abbott, Carter Bishop, Cindy Jebara, Anjali Kumar, Kristen A Root
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly utilized to perform tasks requiring human intelligence, patients who are pregnant may turn to AI for advice on over-the-counter (OTC) medications. However, medications used in pregnancy may pose profound safety concerns limited by data availability. This study focuses on a chatbot's ability to accurately provide information regarding OTC medications as it relates to patients that are pregnant. A prospective, descriptive design was used to compare the responses generated by the Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5) to the information provided by UpToDate®. Eighty-seven of the top pharmacist-recommended OTC drugs in the United States (U.S.) as identified by Pharmacy Times were assessed for safe use in pregnancy using ChatGPT-3.5. A piloted, standard prompt was input into ChatGPT-3.5, and the responses were recorded. Two groups independently rated the responses compared to UpToDate on their correctness, completeness, and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. After independent evaluations, the groups discussed the findings to reach a consensus, with a third independent investigator giving final ratings. For correctness, the median score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-5). For completeness, the median score was 4 (IQR: 4-5). For safety, the median score was 5 (IQR: 5-5). Despite high overall scores, the safety errors in 9% of the evaluations (n = 8), including omissions that pose a risk of serious complications, currently renders the chatbot an unsafe standalone resource for this purpose.
{"title":"Accuracy and Safety of ChatGPT-3.5 in Assessing Over-the-Counter Medication Use During Pregnancy: A Descriptive Comparative Study.","authors":"Bernadette Cornelison, David R Axon, Bryan Abbott, Carter Bishop, Cindy Jebara, Anjali Kumar, Kristen A Root","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040104","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly utilized to perform tasks requiring human intelligence, patients who are pregnant may turn to AI for advice on over-the-counter (OTC) medications. However, medications used in pregnancy may pose profound safety concerns limited by data availability. This study focuses on a chatbot's ability to accurately provide information regarding OTC medications as it relates to patients that are pregnant. A prospective, descriptive design was used to compare the responses generated by the Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5) to the information provided by UpToDate<sup>®</sup>. Eighty-seven of the top pharmacist-recommended OTC drugs in the United States (U.S.) as identified by Pharmacy Times were assessed for safe use in pregnancy using ChatGPT-3.5. A piloted, standard prompt was input into ChatGPT-3.5, and the responses were recorded. Two groups independently rated the responses compared to UpToDate on their correctness, completeness, and safety using a 5-point Likert scale. After independent evaluations, the groups discussed the findings to reach a consensus, with a third independent investigator giving final ratings. For correctness, the median score was 5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-5). For completeness, the median score was 4 (IQR: 4-5). For safety, the median score was 5 (IQR: 5-5). Despite high overall scores, the safety errors in 9% of the evaluations (<i>n</i> = 8), including omissions that pose a risk of serious complications, currently renders the chatbot an unsafe standalone resource for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-30DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040105
Nardine Nakhla, Ashok Hospattankar, Kamran Siddiqui, Mary Barna Bridgeman
Hemorrhoidal disease remains a prevalent yet often overlooked condition, affecting millions worldwide and imposing a substantial healthcare burden. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, gaps persist in patient education, early symptom recognition, and optimal treatment selection. Recent advancements are evolving the pharmacist's role in hemorrhoid management beyond traditional over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription approaches. The 2024 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines introduce updates on the use of phlebotonics, a class of venoactive drugs gaining recognition for their role in symptom management, yet largely underutilized in U.S. clinical practice. In parallel, novel clinical tools are reshaping how pharmacists engage in assessment and care. The integration of digital decision-support platforms and structured evaluation algorithms now empowers them to systematically evaluate symptoms, identify red flag signs, and optimize patient triage. These tools reduce diagnostic variability and improve decision-making accuracy. Given their accessibility and trusted role in frontline healthcare, pharmacists are well-positioned to bridge these critical gaps by adopting emerging treatment recommendations, leveraging algorithm-driven assessments, and reinforcing best practices in patient education and referral. This narrative review aims to equip pharmacists with updated insights into evidence-based hemorrhoid management strategies and provide them with structured assessment algorithms to standardize symptom evaluation and treatment pathways. By integrating these innovations, pharmacists can enhance treatment outcomes, promote patient safety, and contribute to improved quality of life (QoL) for individuals suffering from hemorrhoidal disease.
{"title":"Improving Hemorrhoid Outcomes: A Narrative Review and Best Practices Guide for Pharmacists.","authors":"Nardine Nakhla, Ashok Hospattankar, Kamran Siddiqui, Mary Barna Bridgeman","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040105","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemorrhoidal disease remains a prevalent yet often overlooked condition, affecting millions worldwide and imposing a substantial healthcare burden. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, gaps persist in patient education, early symptom recognition, and optimal treatment selection. Recent advancements are evolving the pharmacist's role in hemorrhoid management beyond traditional over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription approaches. The 2024 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines introduce updates on the use of phlebotonics, a class of venoactive drugs gaining recognition for their role in symptom management, yet largely underutilized in U.S. clinical practice. In parallel, novel clinical tools are reshaping how pharmacists engage in assessment and care. The integration of digital decision-support platforms and structured evaluation algorithms now empowers them to systematically evaluate symptoms, identify red flag signs, and optimize patient triage. These tools reduce diagnostic variability and improve decision-making accuracy. Given their accessibility and trusted role in frontline healthcare, pharmacists are well-positioned to bridge these critical gaps by adopting emerging treatment recommendations, leveraging algorithm-driven assessments, and reinforcing best practices in patient education and referral. This narrative review aims to equip pharmacists with updated insights into evidence-based hemorrhoid management strategies and provide them with structured assessment algorithms to standardize symptom evaluation and treatment pathways. By integrating these innovations, pharmacists can enhance treatment outcomes, promote patient safety, and contribute to improved quality of life (QoL) for individuals suffering from hemorrhoidal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389048/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-29DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040102
Maria Cordina, Mary Anne Lauri, Josef Lauri
The uptake of the COVID-19 and seasonal influenza (SI) vaccines have decreased in Europe and especially in Malta. The present study aimed to investigate the attitudes toward COVID-19 and SI vaccines and determine if individuals perceive that these vaccines are relevant to protect their health and identify reasons for their responses. A cross-sectional study using an anonymous questionnaire, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, addressing behavior beliefs and attitudes, and targeted at adult residents in Malta, was designed on Google Forms and disseminated using social media between January and March 2024. A total of 555 responses were received. The majority of respondents did not take/intend to take the COVID-19 (75%, n = 417) or SI (64.3%, n = 362) vaccines, with females being less likely to do so (p = 0.033). Perceived lack of safety (31.3%, n = 174) was the primary reason for rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine, and perceived lack of a threat from SI (26%, n = 144) was the reason for rejecting the SI vaccine. Those having chronic conditions were positively associated with uptake of both vaccines. In the post-pandemic era, these vaccines are not envisaged as having a major role in protecting one's health. A high degree of skepticism especially toward the combined COVID-19 and SI vaccine in terms of safety, mostly in women, is still present.
在欧洲,特别是马耳他,COVID-19和季节性流感疫苗的接种率有所下降。本研究旨在调查人们对COVID-19和SI疫苗的态度,确定个人是否认为这些疫苗与保护他们的健康有关,并确定他们做出反应的原因。一项横断面研究采用匿名问卷,以计划行为理论为依据,针对马耳他成年居民的行为信念和态度,在谷歌表格上设计,并在2024年1月至3月期间通过社交媒体传播。我们共收到555份回应。大多数受访者没有或打算接种COVID-19 (75%, n = 417)或SI (64.3%, n = 362)疫苗,女性这样做的可能性较小(p = 0.033)。认为缺乏安全性(31.3%,n = 174)是拒绝接种COVID-19疫苗的主要原因,认为缺乏SI威胁(26%,n = 144)是拒绝接种SI疫苗的主要原因。患有慢性疾病的人与两种疫苗的摄取呈正相关。在大流行后时代,人们认为这些疫苗不会在保护健康方面发挥重大作用。在安全性方面,特别是对COVID-19和SI联合疫苗的高度怀疑仍然存在,主要是在女性中。
{"title":"Attitudes Toward COVID-19 and Seasonal Influenza Vaccines in the Post-COVID Era: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Adults in Malta.","authors":"Maria Cordina, Mary Anne Lauri, Josef Lauri","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040102","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uptake of the COVID-19 and seasonal influenza (SI) vaccines have decreased in Europe and especially in Malta. The present study aimed to investigate the attitudes toward COVID-19 and SI vaccines and determine if individuals perceive that these vaccines are relevant to protect their health and identify reasons for their responses. A cross-sectional study using an anonymous questionnaire, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, addressing behavior beliefs and attitudes, and targeted at adult residents in Malta, was designed on Google Forms and disseminated using social media between January and March 2024. A total of 555 responses were received. The majority of respondents did not take/intend to take the COVID-19 (75%, <i>n</i> = 417) or SI (64.3%, <i>n</i> = 362) vaccines, with females being less likely to do so (<i>p</i> = 0.033). Perceived lack of safety (31.3%, <i>n</i> = 174) was the primary reason for rejecting the COVID-19 vaccine, and perceived lack of a threat from SI (26%, <i>n</i> = 144) was the reason for rejecting the SI vaccine. Those having chronic conditions were positively associated with uptake of both vaccines. In the post-pandemic era, these vaccines are not envisaged as having a major role in protecting one's health. A high degree of skepticism especially toward the combined COVID-19 and SI vaccine in terms of safety, mostly in women, is still present.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388974/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-29DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040103
Javeria Khalid, Tarilate Temedie-Asogwa, Marjan Zakeri, Sujit S Sansgiry
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) significantly affect patient safety and healthcare spending worldwide. Hospital pharmacists are uniquely positioned to address ADRs due to their crucial role in medication management. However, underreporting remains a global concern, especially in developing countries, where pharmacovigilance systems are inadequately developed. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to evaluate and compare the knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, and facilitators regarding ADR reporting by hospital pharmacists in a developed (US) and a developing (Pakistan) country. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, using a pre-validated questionnaire. The pharmacists, possessing a minimum of one year's hospital experience, were selected via convenience sampling. Out of 151 respondents, included in the final analysis (US: n = 51; Pakistan: n = 100), the majority were female (62.3%), aged 29-35 years (38%), and possessed a Pharm. D degree (49.7%). The knowledge (US: 6.03 ± 0.27 vs. Pakistan:5.69 ± 0.25, p-value = 0.193) and attitude scores (US: 32.02 ± 0.73 vs. Pakistan: 32.63 ± 0.67; p-value = 0.379) exhibited no significant differences between the groups. Nonetheless, barriers at both the individual and systemic levels were more pronounced in the developing country. Important facilitators reported were mobile applications for ADR reporting, specialized training, and intuitive reporting tools. In conclusion, we found that pharmacists in both settings exhibit comparable knowledge and positive attitudes towards ADR reporting, though specific contextual barriers are present. Interventions customized to the local hospital infrastructure are crucial for enhancing ADR reporting, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
{"title":"Hospital Pharmacists' Perspectives on Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Developed and Developing Countries: A Comparative Pilot Study.","authors":"Javeria Khalid, Tarilate Temedie-Asogwa, Marjan Zakeri, Sujit S Sansgiry","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040103","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040103","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) significantly affect patient safety and healthcare spending worldwide. Hospital pharmacists are uniquely positioned to address ADRs due to their crucial role in medication management. However, underreporting remains a global concern, especially in developing countries, where pharmacovigilance systems are inadequately developed. Therefore, this pilot study aimed to evaluate and compare the knowledge, attitudes, perceived barriers, and facilitators regarding ADR reporting by hospital pharmacists in a developed (US) and a developing (Pakistan) country. A cross-sectional survey was conducted, using a pre-validated questionnaire. The pharmacists, possessing a minimum of one year's hospital experience, were selected via convenience sampling. Out of 151 respondents, included in the final analysis (US: <i>n</i> = 51; Pakistan: <i>n</i> = 100), the majority were female (62.3%), aged 29-35 years (38%), and possessed a Pharm. D degree (49.7%). The knowledge (US: 6.03 ± 0.27 vs. Pakistan:5.69 ± 0.25, <i>p</i>-value = 0.193) and attitude scores (US: 32.02 ± 0.73 vs. Pakistan: 32.63 ± 0.67; <i>p</i>-value = 0.379) exhibited no significant differences between the groups. Nonetheless, barriers at both the individual and systemic levels were more pronounced in the developing country. Important facilitators reported were mobile applications for ADR reporting, specialized training, and intuitive reporting tools. In conclusion, we found that pharmacists in both settings exhibit comparable knowledge and positive attitudes towards ADR reporting, though specific contextual barriers are present. Interventions customized to the local hospital infrastructure are crucial for enhancing ADR reporting, particularly in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389004/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heart failure is a chronic disease with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates, and a thorough understanding of medication adherence and appropriateness is crucial to ensure effective treatment outcomes. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to assess medication adherence, understand the influence of sociodemographic factors on medication adherence, and assess the medication appropriateness for heart failure patients attending the cardiac clinic at National Hospital Kandy (NHK). This study was conducted among 325 heart failure patients attending the cardiac clinic at the NHK. Medication adherence was assessed using the brief medication questionnaire (BMQ) after detailed medication history interviews. Statistically significant associations between total BMQ scores and sociodemographic factors were determined at 95% confidence interval. The appropriateness of the newly prescribed medication lists was assessed using the medication appropriateness index (MAI). Among the 325 patients recruited, the mean total BMQ score was 1.16; 11.7% of the participants were adherent to their medications whereas 15.4% had poor adherence. Most participants (52.0%) were in the probable poor adherent level. Statistically significant associations were observed between total BMQ score and age, sex, and education level. The mean MAI score was 0.56. Medication adherence among heart failure patients was poor and some sociodemographic factors influenced medication adherence. The appropriateness of prescribed medications was found to be acceptable.
{"title":"Evaluation of Medication Adherence and Appropriateness Among Heart Failure Patients Attending the Cardiac Clinic at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.","authors":"Nanayakkara Muhandiramalaya Yasa Kalum Bagyawantha, Isuri Nilnuwani Dangahage, Ghanamoorthy Mayurathan, Weerasinghe Mudiyanselage Suminda Pushpika","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040101","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040101","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure is a chronic disease with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates, and a thorough understanding of medication adherence and appropriateness is crucial to ensure effective treatment outcomes. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to assess medication adherence, understand the influence of sociodemographic factors on medication adherence, and assess the medication appropriateness for heart failure patients attending the cardiac clinic at National Hospital Kandy (NHK). This study was conducted among 325 heart failure patients attending the cardiac clinic at the NHK. Medication adherence was assessed using the brief medication questionnaire (BMQ) after detailed medication history interviews. Statistically significant associations between total BMQ scores and sociodemographic factors were determined at 95% confidence interval. The appropriateness of the newly prescribed medication lists was assessed using the medication appropriateness index (MAI). Among the 325 patients recruited, the mean total BMQ score was 1.16; 11.7% of the participants were adherent to their medications whereas 15.4% had poor adherence. Most participants (52.0%) were in the probable poor adherent level. Statistically significant associations were observed between total BMQ score and age, sex, and education level. The mean MAI score was 0.56. Medication adherence among heart failure patients was poor and some sociodemographic factors influenced medication adherence. The appropriateness of prescribed medications was found to be acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388911/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040099
Courtney E Gamston, Salisa C Westrick, Mafe Zmajevac, Jingjing Qian, Greg Peden, Dillon Hagan, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd
Pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) services decrease preventable hospital readmission. TOC service implementation assessment can inform translation to real-world settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a TOC service for patients with multiple admissions at a regional hospital using the RE-AIM framework. In this quasi-experimental, non-randomized study, individuals with ≥2 recent hospitalizations received pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation and counseling, management of drug-related problems, post-discharge telephonic visits, and social support. The reach, effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance RE-AIM dimensions were assessed using patient and service records. Outcomes included 30-day readmission rates for individuals completing ≥1 outpatient pharmacist visit (intervention) versus those unreachable in the outpatient setting (comparison), completed interventions, implementation features, and service adaptations. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for comparison of categorical variables and the t-test was used for continuous variables. From February 2022 to August 2023, 72.7% of the 66 service participants participated in the intervention (reach). Additionally, 30-day readmission was 22.9% (intervention) versus 55.6% (comparison; p = 0.01). In total, 2279 interventions were documented (effectiveness). The service was adapted (implementation) and expanded to include additional populations (maintenance) to enhance sustainability. Based on RE-AIM evaluation, the pharmacist-led TOC intervention appears to be a sustainable solution for addressing readmission in multivisit patients.
{"title":"The Use of RE-AIM to Evaluate a Pharmacist-Led Transitions of Care Service for Multivisit Patients at a Regional Hospital.","authors":"Courtney E Gamston, Salisa C Westrick, Mafe Zmajevac, Jingjing Qian, Greg Peden, Dillon Hagan, Kimberly Braxton Lloyd","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040099","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacist-led transitions of care (TOC) services decrease preventable hospital readmission. TOC service implementation assessment can inform translation to real-world settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a TOC service for patients with multiple admissions at a regional hospital using the RE-AIM framework. In this quasi-experimental, non-randomized study, individuals with ≥2 recent hospitalizations received pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation and counseling, management of drug-related problems, post-discharge telephonic visits, and social support. The reach, effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance RE-AIM dimensions were assessed using patient and service records. Outcomes included 30-day readmission rates for individuals completing ≥1 outpatient pharmacist visit (intervention) versus those unreachable in the outpatient setting (comparison), completed interventions, implementation features, and service adaptations. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for comparison of categorical variables and the t-test was used for continuous variables. From February 2022 to August 2023, 72.7% of the 66 service participants participated in the intervention (reach). Additionally, 30-day readmission was 22.9% (intervention) versus 55.6% (comparison; <i>p</i> = 0.01). In total, 2279 interventions were documented (effectiveness). The service was adapted (implementation) and expanded to include additional populations (maintenance) to enhance sustainability. Based on RE-AIM evaluation, the pharmacist-led TOC intervention appears to be a sustainable solution for addressing readmission in multivisit patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12388965/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040100
Jennifer Cerulli, Alisha Roberts, Ellie Wilson, Scott Guisinger
A total of 38% of Americans do not meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for calcium including those at risk for osteoporosis. To increase the percentage of patients at risk for osteoporosis who achieve goal calcium RDA intake, a collaborative specialty pharmacy-registered dietitian-nutritionist (RDN) quality improvement program was developed. Patients aged 18 to 90 years old receiving osteoporosis therapy (denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid) or medications that increase bone loss (elagolix, oral prednisone) were provided with a structured assessment and educational intervention. Daily calcium intake included patient self-reported dietary intake plus supplement use. Written and verbal education on increasing dietary intake based on patient preferences was provided with 5 calcium-rich food-source store coupons. Recommendations for supplement selection (citrate vs. carbonate) and/or medication-related problem resolution were provided. Follow-up occurred at 3-6 months. Fifty patients enrolled [94% female, mean age 66.6 years (SD 15.3)] were taking denosumab (36), teriparatide (1), zoledronic acid (1), elagolix (7) and prednisone (5). The mean baseline daily dietary calcium intake was 500 mg (SD 247) with none achieving goal intake with diet alone. Average calcium supplement use in 22 (44%) patients was 686 mg daily (SD 284). At baseline, 17 (34%) met goal daily calcium intake compared to 30 (60%) at post intervention follow-up (p = 0.009). Over half of the store coupons were redeemed. A specialty pharmacy-RDN customized intervention program provides a model for aiding patients to modify calcium intake.
{"title":"CalOPT: A Specialty Pharmacy-Dietitian Quality Improvement Initiative for Calcium Optimization in Patients with Osteoporosis Risk.","authors":"Jennifer Cerulli, Alisha Roberts, Ellie Wilson, Scott Guisinger","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040100","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 38% of Americans do not meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for calcium including those at risk for osteoporosis. To increase the percentage of patients at risk for osteoporosis who achieve goal calcium RDA intake, a collaborative specialty pharmacy-registered dietitian-nutritionist (RDN) quality improvement program was developed. Patients aged 18 to 90 years old receiving osteoporosis therapy (denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid) or medications that increase bone loss (elagolix, oral prednisone) were provided with a structured assessment and educational intervention. Daily calcium intake included patient self-reported dietary intake plus supplement use. Written and verbal education on increasing dietary intake based on patient preferences was provided with 5 calcium-rich food-source store coupons. Recommendations for supplement selection (citrate vs. carbonate) and/or medication-related problem resolution were provided. Follow-up occurred at 3-6 months. Fifty patients enrolled [94% female, mean age 66.6 years (SD 15.3)] were taking denosumab (36), teriparatide (1), zoledronic acid (1), elagolix (7) and prednisone (5). The mean baseline daily dietary calcium intake was 500 mg (SD 247) with none achieving goal intake with diet alone. Average calcium supplement use in 22 (44%) patients was 686 mg daily (SD 284). At baseline, 17 (34%) met goal daily calcium intake compared to 30 (60%) at post intervention follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Over half of the store coupons were redeemed. A specialty pharmacy-RDN customized intervention program provides a model for aiding patients to modify calcium intake.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389519/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
(1) Background: Patient-centered care for individuals with breast cancer requires multidisciplinary cooperation to ensure the appropriate use of medication and prevent medication-related problems. Pharmaceutical care has been associated with improved adherence in breast cancer management, a factor linked to patient outcomes and mortality. This study aims to summarize and explore the provision and utilization of pharmaceutical services for breast cancer patients by pharmacists. (2) Methods: A scoping review was performed to assess the pharmacist's role in providing pharmaceutical services for patients with breast cancer. A comprehensive review of four databases (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Scopus) was completed between 1 January 2012 and 8 April 2025 according to PRISMA-ScR framework. (3) Results: A total of 46 articles met the inclusion criteria, which included RCTs, observatory studies, cohort studies, and reviews. Findings suggest that both clinical and community pharmacists play an important role in prevention, management, and education for breast cancer patients. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacists can improve health outcomes by providing pharmaceutical service in breast cancer care. Optimizing interventions, expanding services, and evaluating long-term cost-effectiveness is needed in the future.
(1)背景:以患者为中心的乳腺癌护理需要多学科合作,以确保药物的正确使用和预防药物相关问题。药物治疗与乳腺癌治疗依从性的提高有关,这是一个与患者预后和死亡率相关的因素。本研究旨在总结和探讨药师为乳腺癌患者提供和利用药学服务的情况。(2)方法:对药师在为乳腺癌患者提供药学服务中的作用进行范围综述。根据PRISMA-ScR框架,在2012年1月1日至2025年4月8日期间完成了对四个数据库(PubMed、Ovid Embase、Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts和Scopus)的全面审查。(3)结果:共有46篇文章符合纳入标准,包括随机对照试验、观察研究、队列研究和综述。研究结果表明,临床和社区药师在乳腺癌患者的预防、管理和教育中发挥着重要作用。(4)结论:药师在乳腺癌护理中提供药学服务可提高患者的健康结局。未来需要优化干预措施、扩大服务和评估长期成本效益。
{"title":"The Role of Pharmacists in Delivering Pharmaceutical Services to Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical and Community Settings: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Yuyao Pei, Ruoxin Huang, Feng Chang, Yuanhui Hu, Sarah Versteeg, Yufen Zheng","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040097","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040097","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: Patient-centered care for individuals with breast cancer requires multidisciplinary cooperation to ensure the appropriate use of medication and prevent medication-related problems. Pharmaceutical care has been associated with improved adherence in breast cancer management, a factor linked to patient outcomes and mortality. This study aims to summarize and explore the provision and utilization of pharmaceutical services for breast cancer patients by pharmacists. (2) Methods: A scoping review was performed to assess the pharmacist's role in providing pharmaceutical services for patients with breast cancer. A comprehensive review of four databases (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Scopus) was completed between 1 January 2012 and 8 April 2025 according to PRISMA-ScR framework. (3) Results: A total of 46 articles met the inclusion criteria, which included RCTs, observatory studies, cohort studies, and reviews. Findings suggest that both clinical and community pharmacists play an important role in prevention, management, and education for breast cancer patients. (4) Conclusions: Pharmacists can improve health outcomes by providing pharmaceutical service in breast cancer care. Optimizing interventions, expanding services, and evaluating long-term cost-effectiveness is needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286014/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-21DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040098
Paula S C C Castro, Kae Leopoldo, Maria Olivia Pozzolo Pedro, Juliana Takitane, Henrique Silva Bombana, André Brooking Negrão, Jaqueline R Scholz, João Maurício Castaldelli-Maia
Objective: To systematically review the scientific literature on lysergic acid amide (LSA), focusing on its physical, neurobiological, and social effects, as well as its potential risks and therapeutic uses. Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science up to December 2023, using keywords such as "ergine," "lysergic acid amide," and "legal high." Studies were included if they reported original human data on the physical, neurobiological, psychological, or social effects of LSA; seventeen studies were included. Animal studies, in vitro research, and non-original articles were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened and selected the studies, with a third resolving discrepancies. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. Results: LSA is primarily consumed through preparations made from the seeds of Convolvulaceae plants. Reported effects include euphoria, hallucinations, nausea, and anxiety. Severe adverse outcomes, such as psychosis, hypertension, and hospitalization, have also been documented. Some evidence suggests its potential therapeutic application for cluster headaches. However, variability in dosing and misinformation on digital platforms heighten the risks associated with LSA use. Conclusions: LSA poses significant health risks, exacerbated by online misinformation and variability in its effects, and a lack of scientific studies. Further research is essential to clarify its pharmacological profile, establish guidelines for safe use, and raise public awareness about its dangers.
目的:对麦角酸酰胺(LSA)的物理、神经生物学和社会效应、潜在风险和治疗用途等方面的文献进行系统综述。方法:到2023年12月,使用“引擎”、“麦麸酸酰胺”和“合法high”等关键词,对PubMed、谷歌Scholar和Web of Science进行了系统综述。如果研究报告了关于LSA的生理、神经生物学、心理或社会影响的原始人类数据,则纳入研究;纳入了17项研究。排除了动物研究、体外研究和非原创文章。两名独立审稿人对研究进行筛选和选择,第三名审稿人负责解决差异。使用标准化表格提取数据。该审查遵循PRISMA指南,并有望在开放科学框架上注册。结果:LSA主要是通过旋花科植物种子制成的制剂摄入的。报告的效果包括欣快感、幻觉、恶心和焦虑。严重的不良后果,如精神病、高血压和住院也有记录。一些证据表明它有治疗丛集性头痛的潜在应用。然而,剂量的变化和数字平台上的错误信息增加了与LSA使用相关的风险。结论:LSA具有显著的健康风险,网络上的错误信息和影响的可变性以及缺乏科学研究加剧了这一风险。进一步的研究是必要的,以澄清其药理学特征,建立安全使用指南,并提高公众对其危险性的认识。
{"title":"Lysergic Acid Amide (LSA), an LSD Analog: Systematic Review of Pharmacological Effects, Adverse Outcomes, and Therapeutic Potentials.","authors":"Paula S C C Castro, Kae Leopoldo, Maria Olivia Pozzolo Pedro, Juliana Takitane, Henrique Silva Bombana, André Brooking Negrão, Jaqueline R Scholz, João Maurício Castaldelli-Maia","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040098","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040098","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: To systematically review the scientific literature on lysergic acid amide (LSA), focusing on its physical, neurobiological, and social effects, as well as its potential risks and therapeutic uses. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science up to December 2023, using keywords such as \"ergine,\" \"lysergic acid amide,\" and \"legal high.\" Studies were included if they reported original human data on the physical, neurobiological, psychological, or social effects of LSA; seventeen studies were included. Animal studies, in vitro research, and non-original articles were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened and selected the studies, with a third resolving discrepancies. Data were extracted using a standardized form. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. <b>Results</b><i>:</i> LSA is primarily consumed through preparations made from the seeds of Convolvulaceae plants. Reported effects include euphoria, hallucinations, nausea, and anxiety. Severe adverse outcomes, such as psychosis, hypertension, and hospitalization, have also been documented. Some evidence suggests its potential therapeutic application for cluster headaches. However, variability in dosing and misinformation on digital platforms heighten the risks associated with LSA use. <b>Conclusions</b><i>:</i> LSA poses significant health risks, exacerbated by online misinformation and variability in its effects, and a lack of scientific studies. Further research is essential to clarify its pharmacological profile, establish guidelines for safe use, and raise public awareness about its dangers.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286086/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-15DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy13040096
Mitchell L Doucette, Emily Fisher, Junella Chin, Panagiota Kitsantas
Introduction: Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of U.S. adults, imposing significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. Medical cannabis has emerged as a potential therapy, yet its impact on healthcare utilization remains unclear.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed administrative data from a telehealth platform providing medical cannabis certifications across 36 U.S. states. Patients were classified as cannabis-exposed if they had used cannabis in the past year, while unexposed patients had no prior cannabis use. Outcomes included self-reported urgent care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and quality of life (QoL), measured using the CDC's Healthy Days measure. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation with SuperLearner estimated causal effects, adjusting for numerous covariates.
Results: Medical cannabis users exhibited significantly lower healthcare utilization. Specifically, exposure was associated with a 2.0 percentage point reduction in urgent care visits (95% CI: -0.036, -0.004), a 3.2 percentage point reduction in ED visits (95% CI: -0.051, -0.012) and fewer unhealthy days per month (-3.52 days, 95% CI: -4.28, -2.76). Hospitalization rates trended lower but were not statistically significant. Covariate balance and propensity score overlap indicated well-fitting models.
Conclusions: Medical cannabis use was associated with reduced healthcare utilization and improved self-reported QoL among chronic pain patients.
{"title":"Medical Cannabis Use and Healthcare Utilization Among Patients with Chronic Pain: A Causal Inference Analysis Using TMLE.","authors":"Mitchell L Doucette, Emily Fisher, Junella Chin, Panagiota Kitsantas","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040096","DOIUrl":"10.3390/pharmacy13040096","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain affects approximately 20% of U.S. adults, imposing significant burdens on individuals and healthcare systems. Medical cannabis has emerged as a potential therapy, yet its impact on healthcare utilization remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed administrative data from a telehealth platform providing medical cannabis certifications across 36 U.S. states. Patients were classified as cannabis-exposed if they had used cannabis in the past year, while unexposed patients had no prior cannabis use. Outcomes included self-reported urgent care visits, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and quality of life (QoL), measured using the CDC's Healthy Days measure. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation with SuperLearner estimated causal effects, adjusting for numerous covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical cannabis users exhibited significantly lower healthcare utilization. Specifically, exposure was associated with a 2.0 percentage point reduction in urgent care visits (95% CI: -0.036, -0.004), a 3.2 percentage point reduction in ED visits (95% CI: -0.051, -0.012) and fewer unhealthy days per month (-3.52 days, 95% CI: -4.28, -2.76). Hospitalization rates trended lower but were not statistically significant. Covariate balance and propensity score overlap indicated well-fitting models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical cannabis use was associated with reduced healthcare utilization and improved self-reported QoL among chronic pain patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144699681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}