{"title":"Frédéric Döhl: Zwischen Pastiche und Zitat","authors":"M. Grünberger","doi":"10.1628/zge-2023-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2023-0016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126142867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Sophie Herold: Vertragsschlüsse unter Einbeziehung automatisiert und autonom agierender Systeme. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2020 (Karlsruher Schriften zum Wettbewerbs- und Immaterialgüterrecht, Bd. 4","authors":"C. Linke","doi":"10.1628/zge-2021-0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2021-0033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130400772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"§ 68 UrhG und die Zukunft der verwandten Schutzrechte","authors":"H. Haberstumpf","doi":"10.1628/zge-2022-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2022-0010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128795010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Amit Datta: Die angemessene Vergütung des Urhebers. Risiken und Grenzen des Buy-out Vertrages im Filmbereich. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018. (Geistiges Eigentum und Wettbewerbsrecht, Bd. 142). XIX, 501","authors":"C. Berger","doi":"10.1628/zge-2020-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2020-0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122458386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Art. 44 TRIPS on injunctions does not state any requirement of proportionality of any sort in the granting of such injunctions: “The judicial authorities shall have the authority to order a party to desist from an infringement [...]“. If the drafters of the TRIPS Agreement had intended to stipulate such precondition they would have explicitly done so. This can be deduced from a comparison to Art. 46 TRIPS on Other Remedies, which explicitly mentions a “need for proportionality” in considering such requests.
{"title":"Injunctions in European Patent Law","authors":"L. Tochtermann","doi":"10.1628/zge-2019-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1628/zge-2019-0018","url":null,"abstract":"Art. 44 TRIPS on injunctions does not state any requirement of proportionality of any sort in the granting of such injunctions: “The judicial authorities shall have the authority to order a party to desist from an infringement [...]“. If the drafters of the TRIPS Agreement had intended to stipulate such precondition they would have explicitly done so. This can be deduced from a comparison to Art. 46 TRIPS on Other Remedies, which explicitly mentions a “need for proportionality” in considering such requests.","PeriodicalId":309477,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124330028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：